328

2010 Route 62 Smart Transportation Study - Northwest Commission

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS PENNDOT DISTRICT 1-0 NORTHWEST PENNSYLVANIA REGIONAL CITY OF OIL CITY

PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION 255 Elm Street 395 Seneca Street 21 Seneca Street PO Box 398 PO Box 1127 Oil City, PA 16301 Oil City, PA 16301 Oil City, PA 16301 Phone: 814.678.7006 Phone: 814.677.7663 Phone: 814.678.3012 www.dot.state.pa.us www.nwcommission.org www.oilcity.org PROJECT STEERING COMMITTEE: City of Oil City - Christina Sporer, City Engineer Ryan Eggleston, City Manager Jan Ruditis Northwest Commission - Sue Smith PA Department of Transportation - Erin Wiley Moyers Randy Brink Susan Roach Venango County - Judy Downs Council on Greenway & Trails - Debra Frawley South Side Business Association - Brian Stoltenburg Oil Valley Chapter of the PA Council of the Blind - Scott Roberts Don Fischer PROJECT FUNDING: The completion of the Route 62 Smart Transportation Study was funded through Pennsylvania Department of Transportation’s Pennsylvania Community Transportation Initiative (PCTI) aimed to promote Smart Transportation solutions throughout the commonwealth of Pennsylvania. PROJECT CONSULTANTS: Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc. Traffic Planning and Design, Inc.

1550 Coraopolis Heights Road Regional Enterprise Tower Suite 440 425 Sixth Avenue Moon Township, PA 15108 Suite 2825 Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Phone: 412.375.5100 Phone: 412.765.3717 www.jmt.com www.trafficpd.com

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | i

Table of Contents Section 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1

Section 1.1 Plan Purpose ........................................................................................................................... 1

Section 1.2 Planning Process..................................................................................................................... 2

Section 2.0 Vision, Goals & Objectives ......................................................................................................... 5

Section 2.1 Vision ...................................................................................................................................... 5

Section 2.2 Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities & Threats (SWOT) .................................................... 6

Section 2.3 Goal Setting ............................................................................................................................ 7

Section 2.4 Formulating Strategies ........................................................................................................... 8

Section 2.4.1 Smart Transportation ...................................................................................................... 8

Section 3.0 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................... 11

Section 3.1 Study Area Conditions .......................................................................................................... 11

Section 3.1.1 Transportation Facilities ................................................................................................ 11

Section 3.1.2 Parking ........................................................................................................................... 11

Section 3.2 Traffic Operations................................................................................................................. 15

Section 3.2.1 Traffic Count Data Summary ......................................................................................... 15

Section 3.2.2 Future Traffic Projections .............................................................................................. 15

Section 3.2.3 Safety Analysis ............................................................................................................... 21

Section 3.2.4 Traffic Signals ................................................................................................................ 21

Section 3.2.5 Traffic Analysis .............................................................................................................. 22

Section 3.2.6 Access Management ..................................................................................................... 24

Section 3.2.7 Transit............................................................................................................................ 25

Section 3.3 Existing Land Use .................................................................................................................. 25

Section 3.3.1 Northern Venango County Multi-Municipal Regional Plan .......................................... 29

Section 3.4 Open Space and Greenways................................................................................................. 31

Section 3.4.1 Venango County Greenways Plan ................................................................................. 31

Section 3.4.2 Oil City Comprehensive Waterways Plan ...................................................................... 32

Section 4.0 Analysis of Improvement Options and Solutions ..................................................................... 35

Section 4.1 Front Street (Route 62) Corridor .......................................................................................... 35

Section 4.2 Streetscape Improvements .................................................................................................. 38

Section 4.3 Access Management ............................................................................................................ 39

Section 4.4 Traffic Signalization Plan ...................................................................................................... 41

Section 4.5 Wye Bridge Improvements .................................................................................................. 43

Section 4.6 Greenway / Trail ................................................................................................................... 44

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | ii

Section 4.7 Public Plaza ........................................................................................................................... 45

Section 4.8 Land Use and Economic Development Opportunities ......................................................... 46

Section 4.8.1 Methods for Determining a Balanced Mix of Uses ....................................................... 46

Section 4.8.2 Assessing Building and Business Inventory ................................................................... 46

Section 4.8.3 Business Community SWOT Analysis and Visual Preference Survey ............................ 47

Section 4.8.4 Analyzing the Business Mix using a Gap Analysis ......................................................... 47

Section 4.8.5 Analyzing Local Characteristics ..................................................................................... 49

Section 4.8.6 Revitalization Strategies ................................................................................................ 49

Section 4.9 South Side Business District Revitalization Concepts ........................................................... 53

Section 5.0 Action Plan ............................................................................................................................... 69

Section 5.1 Project Prioritization and Implementation .......................................................................... 69

Appendix A: Community Participation Report

Appendix B: Traffic Count Data

Appendix C: Future Traffic Projections

Appendix D: Traffic Signal Inventory

Appendix E: Synchro HCM Reports

Appendix F: Funding Analysis

Appendix G: GAP Analysis

Appendix H: Access Management

Appendix I: Traffic Signal Warrant Analyses

Section 1

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 1

Section 1.0 Introduction The City of Oil City is located in Venango County at the confluence of Oil Creek at the Allegheny River. Oil City is bordered by Cornplanter Township, Cranberry Township, and Sugarcreek Borough. The City encompasses 4.7 square miles of a predominately rural community of wooded lots and rolling hills. The region of Oil City was first established as an American settlement in the early 1800s, but grew in size and population following the development of commercial oil wells, refineries and support businesses. The growth of Oil City was a direct result of its location where Oil Creek and the Allegheny River come together, and the use of the Allegheny River as the primary means of transporting the local resources. The downtown area of Oil City is split by the Allegheny River. The two areas of Oil City’s downtown are commonly known as the “north side” and “south side.” US Route 62 runs through Oil City and provides access to the City’s south side area. US Route 62, or East Front Street/East First Street as it is named on the south side, runs along the Allegheny River through the downtown area and crosses the River by way of Petroleum Street.

Section 1.1 Plan Purpose

Venango County, in cooperation with the City of Oil City, realized the need to examine the land use and transportation needs impacting the sustainability, accessibility and safety of US Route 62 through Oil City. This corridor traverses an urban, densely developed portion of the south side of Oil City. Therefore, as with any downtown area, there is a mix of various transportation modes that must be considered in developing appropriate transportation and land use enhancements. The study emphasis is to coordinate transportation improvements with land use, infrastructure and other community development decisions that will respond to the unique land use and transportation needs of the south side business and commercial districts and that will be cohesive with goals and objectives defined by the stakeholders at the outset of the project. In

Oil City’s South Side

Latonia Theatre

Wye Bridge

Section 1

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 2

2005, Hickory Engineering (a Herbert, Rowland & Grubic, Inc. Company) prepared a “Route 8 and Route 62 Corridor Evaluation” under contract with the Oil Region Alliance and the municipalities of the City of Oil City, Cornplanter Township, City of Franklin, Sugarcreek Borough, and Rouseville Borough. This study generated (a) a database of all buildings, land parcels, and properties along Routes 8 and/or 62 in the subject governmental entities; (b) detailed building condition reports and adaptive use/reuse plans for 13 sample buildings throughout the corridor; (c) riverfront access and recreation development recommendations; and (d) policy/planning recommendations to showcase these highways which in essence function as the Main Street of the heart of Venango County, Pennsylvania. The City of Oil City has also undertaken a Comprehensive Waterways Plan to address the waterways assets running through the City and capitalizing on them to improve the quality of life for residents and to promote economic development and increased tourism. The Route 62 Smart Transportation Study will coordinate with these and other efforts so that the recommendations of this study will complement and work with these other studies to reach the overall goals of the City. The transportation recommendations and land use decisions along the US Route 62 Corridor are important to the overall transportation network and future economic growth of Oil City.

Section 1.2 Planning Process

The process for developing the US Route 62 Corridor Plan was based on a collaborative planning effort focused on gaining an understanding of the community’s vision for the study area. Several key parties were involved through discussions about the project and initiatives to assist in developing an understanding of future growth in the area. The project Steering Committee included representatives from the City of Oil City, Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission (NWPRPDC), PennDOT District 1-0, Venango County Regional Planning Commission, South Side Business Association, and other key stakeholders. The planning process also included coordination with the general public to assist with the development of future plans for the project study area. Documentation of the planning process is contained in Appendix A: Community Participation Report.

Section 1

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 3

Section 2

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 4

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

Section 2

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 5

Section 2.0 Vision, Goals & Objectives The Vision for the study corridor, including its goals, objectives, implementation concepts and strategies, creates the foundation that guides future transportation enhancements, development and redevelopment/revitalization projects. Such strategies and future development policies are created through a collaborative step-by-step planning process used to create a Vision for the Corridor. The planning process for the Route 62 Corridor Study followed these steps for strategic vision planning:

Step 1: Vision - Define the vision and set a strategy containing a hierarchy of goals. Step 2: SWOT - Analysis conducted to understand a community’s “perceived” issues and

assets (conducted at first public forum). Step 3: Goal Setting – Prepare measurable, meaningful, and attainable goals based on

community sustainability indicators (business meeting, first public meeting, committee meetings).

Step 4: Formulate Strategies - Formulate actions and processes to be taken to attain these goals (Map your Path).

Section 2.1 Vision

An initial Vision Statement was prepared using key words identified by the project’s Steering Committee at the kick-off meeting. Committee members were asked: What key words would you use to describe the future corridor?

Key Words Development / Re-Development Smart Transportation Implementation Strategy Pedestrian Safety Vehicular Safety River Access Improved Sight Distance Aesthetically Pleasing Accessible Sustainable

A second draft of the Vision Statement was prepared and finalized after the first public meeting. The following is the statement refined through the planning process, and accepted as a Vision for the corridor:

Corridor Vision Statement Enhance the Route 62 Corridor within Oil City to be a model of PennDOT's Smart Transportation initiative by coordinating transportation improvements with land use, infrastructure, economic development and community revitalization. Implementation strategies and community revitalization projects will strengthen a sense of place and establish safe, inviting, aesthetically pleasing and sustainable commercial and residential neighborhoods within the South Side Business District. Transportation improvements will address vehicular, transit, bicycle and pedestrian safety, accessibility and mobility. Improvements will enhance the Corridor and other streets to provide connections to and from residential and commercial neighborhoods and the waterfront for all modes of transportation. Transportation improvements will provide an opportunity for renewed development within and around the Corridor, continued community growth and a variety of amenities which establish this area as a unique place attracting residents, businesses and visitors.

Section 2

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 6

INTERNAL FACTORS - Factors that can be influenced by residents, local businesses, and municipal and county government. (Strengths & Weaknesses)

EXTERNAL FACTORS - Factors that are influenced by private property owners, developers, adjacent state and county regulatory mandates, market conditions and other factors. (Opportunities & Threats)

Section 2.2 Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities & Threats (SWOT)

The purpose of the SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities & Threats) activity was to provide an opportunity for residents, business owners and other key stakeholders to identify the community’s assets or strengths and opportunities as well as weaknesses and threats. The planning process for the Route 62 Corridor included a two-part process. The initial step involved obtaining thoughts on the area’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats from the Project Steering Committee and the South Side Business Association. The following identifies the framework for the SWOT activity as it was conducted with the two groups.

STRENGTHS (S) – List the physical, social and regulatory assets within the region or your community.

What makes this region or your community unique? What do I like about this region or your community? What is contributing to a positive image in the region or your community?

WEAKNESSES (W) – List the physical, social or regulatory obstacles or shortcomings within the region or your community.

What do I dislike about this region or your community? What would I like to see less of in this region or your community? What is contributing to a poor community image in the region or your community?

OPPORTUNITIES (O) – List the physical and social entities or assets located outside the region that are underutilized or undeveloped.

Where are opportunities for new development and/or preservation in the region or your community? Where are opportunities for change? What would I like to see more of in this region or your community? What could change the image of this region or your community?

THREATS (T) – List the physical and social entities located outside the region that detract from the community or if left unchecked could diminish quality of life for residents and businesses in the community.

What prevents this region or your community from flourishing? What are obstacles to community development and/or preservation? What detracts from a positive image in the region or your community?

The final step in the SWOT Analysis activity involved presenting the general public with a summary list of the key issues associated with the study area in an effort to obtain a prioritized list of issues of concern.

Section 2

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 7

The planning process has revealed six focus topics to which goals and objectives have been created: � Safety � Aesthetically pleasing improvements � Promotion of development/re-development opportunities � Considerations for alternate modes of transportation � Project prioritization/funding opportunities � Riverfront access

The attendees at the April Public Meeting commented on the critical issues within or near the study corridor and prioritized those issues. Table 1 lists the issues of concern in priority order as voted on by attendees of the Business Association, Steering Committee and Public Meetings.

Table 1: Study Area Issues (1 = greatest issue of concern / 10 = lowest issue of concern)

Issue of Concern Business Association

Steering Committee

Public

Antiquated Traffic Signals at Intersections - High Rate of Accidents -Right Turns (Weakness)

2 2 2

Sight Distance at Major Intersections (Weakness) 5 6 1

Blighted Properties - Out of Town Owners (Threat) 4 3 5

Pedestrian Enhancements - Sidewalk, Plantings, Trashcans, Benches (Opportunity)

1 9 3

Traffic Speed (Weakness) 6 1 8

Safety and Pedestrian Crossing Signs - Enhanced Signage (Opportunity)

3 4 10

Traffic Calming - Roundabouts (Opportunity) 8 5 7

Available Funding and Current Local Economy (Threat) 9 7 4

Pedestrian Trails, Paths and Sidewalks - Railroad / Pedestrian Bridge - (Opportunity)

7 8 6

Bike Lanes along Roadways - Bike Facilities (Opportunity) 10 10 9

The results of the SWOT analysis, in coordination with the preliminary discussions with the Steering Committee, were used to help establish the potential improvements throughout the project study area.

Section 2.3 Goal Setting

Project goals were developed based upon issues and concerns expressed by the Steering Committee, Business Association, public meeting attendees and by local officials and staff. The goals and objectives outlined provide the basis for future transportation improvements, development/redevelopment and revitalization programs, policies, regulatory changes, and implementation projects.

Section 2

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 8

� Safety Goal: Create a safer environment along Route 62 and within south side’s downtown area for motorists, pedestrians, and bicyclists. � Aesthetically Pleasing Improvements Goal: Provide improvement solutions which incorporate Smart Transportation components and enhance the overall aesthetics to promote the character of the City.

� Promotion of Development/Re-Development Opportunities Goal: Gain recommendations for zoning and ordinance changes to promote development/re-development. � Considerations for Alternate Modes of Transportation Goal: Create strategies for the south side area that enable pedestrians, bicyclists and public transit vehicles and riders safe connections to shopping, work and places of entertainment.

� Project Prioritization/Funding Opportunities Goal: Develop a deliverable that identifies specific projects with associated costs to allow for the future addition of projects onto the Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP). � Riverfront Access Goal: Create strategies for developing a more accessible and inviting riverfront.

Section 2.4 Formulating Strategies

Formulating strategies requires the planning process to formulate actions and strategies to be taken to attain the goals and objectives outlined in the previous section. In order to understand all necessary actions, consistency with State, County and City initiatives must be clearly identified and incorporated into action planning. The Route 62 Transportation Corridor Plan incorporates the guiding principles recognized by the Commonwealth. The following guiding principles outline the characteristics and identify broad guidelines for transportation and community revitalization. The Smart Transportation Initiative is a leading statewide initiative that stresses the importance of creating solutions that are appropriate and specific to your community.

Section 2.4.1 Smart Transportation

Smart Transportation asks us to understand the financial, environmental, technological, and social contexts to which the State and others approach a community’s transportation challenges. Engineers are asked to apply the most innovative and cost-effective tools, ideas and design solutions to solve transportation challenges, while also helping to build or rebuild downtowns. The guiding principles that govern Smart Transportation include:

� Solutions tailored to the context of the community. Oil City has a unique mix of commercial and residential uses within and adjacent to the downtown core. An example of a solution unique to the community includes promoting the use

Section 2

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 9

of alternative modes of transportation, such as walking and bicycling, to take advantage of the unique land use mix that exists around the downtown core.

� Approach and solution tailored to meet specific project needs.

The analysis of the issues, concerns and needs integrate smart transportation solutions with downtown revitalization strategies that help create an increased sense of place.

� Projects planned in collaboration with the community. The planning process is a collaborative process that includes community businesses, local government staff, regional coordinating agencies, appointed steering committee and the general public, integrating the technical aspects of the project with public input.

Supporting agencies:

City of Oil City Oil Valley Chapter of the PA NWPRPDC Council of the Blind Venango County Planning Commission Council on Greenways & Trails PennDOT District 1-0 VenanGO Bus South Side Business Association Oil Region Alliance

Area Residents South Side Neighborhood Association

� Solutions address needs for alternative modes of

transportation. This community has great potential in that solutions for alternate modes of transportation are viable and are considered part of the strategy for short-term implementation solutions.

� Solutions formulated using ‘sound professional judgment.’ Sound planning and engineering design solutions ranged from community revitalization projects, to linkages to transit, to safe pedestrian walk and crossways and to context sensitive land use and transportation solutions that achieve the desired vision for the community.

� Scale of the solution is designed based upon the

problem. Oil City has historic and cultural value to the region. The scale of recommended project work is appropriately sized with respect to this urban environment. Design solutions are innovative and meet the needs of all modes of travel depending upon corridor location.

Section 2

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 10

These guiding principles, through a collaborative planning process with the various key stakeholders, were used to formulate strategies to address the transportation and land use issues within and surrounding the study area.

Section 3

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 11

Signalized Intersections along Front Street

State Street Petroleum Street

Signalized Intersections along

First Street State Street Central Avenue Petroleum Street

Section 3.0 Existing Conditions Analysis of existing conditions within the study area provides an understanding of the current social, economic and physical environment. This section presents a summary of the existing conditions along the Route 62 Corridor and surrounding study area.

Section 3.1 Study Area Conditions

The initial study area was defined as the Route 62 Corridor leading into the south side of Oil City from Pumphouse Road to Petroleum Street. While this area defined the Route 62 Corridor along the south side, the study area was expanded through discussions with the Project Steering Committee to include a larger portion of the downtown area within the south side of Oil City. A Smart Transportation Study is focused on studying a network of streets, pedestrian facilities and transit services within a defined area with the goal of balancing the transportation, community and land use improvements which benefit all users. Based upon the goal of a Smart Transportation Study, the project study area was redefined to encompasses the transportation network of the area bounded by US Route 62 (Front Street), Petroleum Bridge and Second Street. Figure 2 provides a graphical summary of the final study area.

Section 3.1.1 Transportation Facilities

A section of US Route 62 (Front Street) in Oil City is a four-lane roadway that prohibits parking anywhere along the Corridor from Pumphouse Road to the First Street/Wilson Avenue intersection. At the intersection of Wilson Avenue, Front Street becomes a part of a one-way-pair roadway system with First Street. From this point, Front Street consists of one or two northbound travel lanes to the intersection with Petroleum Street, while First Street consists of two southbound travel lanes between Petroleum Street and Wilson Avenue. The posted speed limit within the study area is 40 mph along the four-lane roadway section and 25 mph within the downtown core area. The study area consists of a total of five (5) signalized intersections; with two along Front Street and three along First Street. The overall condition of the existing roadways within the study area range from good to fair. There currently are no sidewalk facilities along the Front Street Corridor from Pumphouse Road to State Street. Pedestrian facilities do exist within the downtown area of the study area, including along First Street, Front Street (from Wilson to Petroleum), State Street, Central Avenue, Petroleum Street and Second Street. The condition varies throughout the study area. In addition, most of the existing ADA curb ramps do not meet current PennDOT requirements.

Section 3.1.2 Parking

The Front Street Corridor prohibits parking along the four-lane section leading into town from the southeast. The properties located adjacent to Front Street along this four-lane section are commercial and include off-street parking at each of the individual businesses. Front Street, from Wilson Avenue to Petroleum Street includes on-street parallel parking on one or both sides of Front Street. Petroleum Street between Front Street and First Street does not provide on-street parking, but does have a drop-off area adjacent to the YMCA. Wilson Avenue has no on-street parking between Front Street and Second Street. All of the remaining streets within the study area provide on-street parking. This

Section 3

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 12

includes Petroleum Street south of First Street, Central Avenue, State Street, Wilson Avenue south of Second Street, First Street and Second Street. Most of the parking spaces are parallel with the roadway, except that portions of the parking on Central Avenue and State Street are angled. Figure 3 provides a summary of the on-street parking facilities and Figure 4 provides a summary of off-street facilities.

Figure 2: Study Area

Section 3

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 15

Section 3.2 Traffic Operations

Average daily traffic (ADT) data from PennDOT’s Roadway Management System (RMS) database was obtained from PennDOT District 1-0. In addition, manual turning movement (MTM) traffic counts were performed at the 13 key study intersections during “typical” weekdays (Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday) in November 2009; vehicular weekday peak hour traffic was also recorded in July 2010. These MTM counts recorded passenger vehicles, truck traffic (3+ axles), and bicycle traffic in 15-minute increments during the AM (7-9 a.m.) and PM (4-6 p.m.) peak periods. During the MTM counts noted above, pedestrian movements were also recorded at each intersection location. Each pedestrian movement was recorded in 15-minute increments by the approach that was crossed. During project steering committee meetings, it was noted that pedestrians are utilizing the railroad Wye Bridge near Pumphouse Road to cross the Allegheny River, as this crossing is the most direct route for pedestrians to achieve access to the southside, particularly to shopping destinations, from the Siverly neighborhood. Therefore, a pedestrian traffic count was conducted in the vicinity of the SR 62/Pumphouse Road intersection on July 8, 2010. The purpose of this count was to determine the number and location of pedestrian crossings across Route 62 in this area.

Section 3.2.1 Traffic Count Data Summary

The MTM traffic counts noted above were conducted during the month of November 2009 (November 3rd thru November 18th) at 13 key study intersections. AM and PM peak hour vehicular and pedestrian traffic volumes were determined from this data and are summarized in Figure 5.

Additional MTM traffic counts were conducted at seven of the 13 key study intersections during the month of July 2010. These traffic counts data were collected for comparison with the November data; it was anticipated that pedestrian and bicycle activity would be greater during summer months versus during late fall, due to inclement weather conditions. The AM and PM peak hour vehicular and pedestrian traffic volumes for this July 2010 data are shown in Figure 6. Copies of all traffic count data is contained in Appendix B.

A comparison of the November 2009 and July 2010 traffic volume data revealed the following:

Vehicular traffic volumes were greater in November 2009 than July 2010. There were no significant differences in pedestrian activity at the key study intersections. This indicates that pedestrian activity appears to be consistent throughout the year within the study corridor.

Section 3.2.2 Future Traffic Projections

One redevelopment project for the southeast corner of Petroleum and First Streets is in preliminary planning stages. The former use of this land was a funeral home, and a bank is planning to build a branch office on that site. A transportation improvement project located to the south of the project corridor at the intersection of Route 62 and SR 257 is currently in the final design stages; a new traffic signal is planned for that location. The PennDOT Traffic Unit suggested using a background growth rate of 0.5% per year for future year traffic projections along the Corridor; this growth rate will capture increases in future traffic volumes along the corridor due to these development/redevelopment and transportation enhancement projects.

Spreadsheets showing the calculated future traffic volume projections are contained in Appendix C.

Section 3

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 16

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

Section 3

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 21

Section 3.2.3 Safety Analysis

Available reportable and non-reportable crash data for the most recent five-year period was provided by the City of Oil City and PennDOT District 1-0. This data showed that most of the crashes occurred at intersections. The table below provides a summary of the crash data for the study area intersections.

TABLE 3.1: Five-Year Crash History

Intersection # Crashes Predominant Type Front St / Petroleum St 17 Rear End Front St / Central Ave 4 Angle Front St / State St 4 Angle First St / Petroleum Ave 6 Struck Object/Parked Car First St / Central Ave 1 Pedestrian (fatality) First St / State St 7 Rear End/Angle, Pedestrian Front St / Wilson Ave 5 Angle First St / Wilson Ave 7 Angle Front St / E. Second St 7 Rear End/Angle Front St / Pumphouse Rd 4 Rear End

The intersection of Front Street / Petroleum Street experienced the most crashes in the Corridor. The midblock location with the highest number of crashes was the two-lane section of First Street between the intersections of Central Avenue and State Street; there were seven crashes (three rear-end and three struck fixed object). It should also be noted that even though the crash data showed there were seven crashes at the First Street / Wilson Avenue intersection over the 5-year data period, several people (during the project steering committee meetings, at a meeting with the south side business group, and at public meetings) commented that many near misses regularly occur at this intersection and sometimes involve pedestrians. These people stated that it is a daily occurrence.

Section 3.2.4 Traffic Signals

Within the study area, there are five signalized intersections. Existing traffic signal permit plans for each of these intersections was obtained from PennDOT. The existing timings programmed in each signal controller are shown on the signal permit plans.

The signal permit plans also indicate that the existing signals operate under time-based coordination; no physical signal interconnect (hardwire, fiber or wireless) currently exists.

The Oil City Fire Department maintains the existing traffic signals. JMT conducted a traffic signal inventory with the Fire Department. The purpose of this inventory was to field visit each signalized intersection and verify/record the existing signal equipment located at each intersection, for use in determining appropriate traffic signal upgrades/improvements.

Section 3

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 22

In discussions with the Fire Department personnel responsible for maintaining the traffic signals, JMT discovered the following:

Traffic signal heads have been upgraded to LED. The controller clocks “drift” out of time. Approximately once a month, the fire department manually resets each controller clock. The current signal timing and phasing programmed in each controller correspond to those shown on the signal permit plans.

Section 3.2.5 Traffic Analysis

The Synchro Version 7 traffic engineering software was used in performing the traffic analysis for this project; the HCM report output generated from the Synchro capacity analysis implements the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology and delay/LOS calculation. The existing roadway and signal network was coded in Synchro utilizing the intersection lane configurations obtained from field site visits, signal permit plans, and current AM and PM peak hour traffic volume data obtained from the MTM counts discussed in Section 3.2.

The results of the signalized and unsignalized intersection capacity/Levels of Service (LOS) analyses for existing conditions are shown in Tables 3.2 and 3.3, respectively. These results show the overall intersection operation; the detailed Synchro HCM Reports showing the delay and LOS for each approach and individual lane group movement are contained in Appendix D.

TABLE 3.2: Existing Year (2009) Signalized Intersection Capacity Analyses

INTERSECTION/ APPROACH

LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) / DELAY (sec/veh)

AM PM

W. FRONT ST / PETROLEUM ST B / 15.1 B/ 15.9

E. FRONT ST / STATE ST B / 14.2 B / 18.5

W. FIRST ST / PETROLEUM ST C / 22.4 C / 34.2

FIRST ST / CENTRAL AVE B / 11.6 B / 14.5

E. FIRST ST / STATE ST A / 10.0- B / 14.1

Section 3

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 23

TABLE 3.3: Existing Year (2009) Un-signalized Intersection Capacity Analyses

INTERSECTION/ APPROACH

LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) / DELAY (sec/veh)(1)

AM PM

W. FRONT ST / CENTRAL AVE B / 11.9 C / 17.3

E. FRONT ST / WILSON AVE B / 11.3 B / 11.6

E. FIRST ST / WILSON AVE B / 13.5 C / 20.4

E. FRONT ST / IMPERIAL ST B / 12.3 C / 15.8

E. FRONT ST / E. SECOND ST C / 20.1 D / 25.4

E. SECOND ST / WILSON AVE B / 10.0+ C / 15.0

E. SECOND ALLEY / WILSON AVE B / 10.2 B / 11.4

E. SECOND ST / PINE ST B / 10.2 B / 12.8

E. SECOND ST / IMPERIAL ST A / 9.9 B / 13.1

Notes:

(1) LOS and delay shown are conditions for worst case conflicting movement of un-signalized intersection.

These results show that all study intersections are currently operating near or under capacity at LOS D or better during both the morning and evening peak hours. For use as a baseline in comparing potential improvement alternatives, an analysis of future “no-build” conditions was performed for the projected Year 2030 traffic volumes.

TABLE 3.4: Future Year 2030 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analyses

INTERSECTION/ APPROACH

LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) / DELAY (sec/veh)

AM PM

W. FRONT ST / PETROLEUM ST B / 15.5 B/ 17.3

E. FRONT ST / STATE ST B / 14.6 B / 19.1

W. FIRST ST / PETROLEUM ST C / 23.9 D / 35.4

W. FIRST ST / CENTRAL AVE B / 11.7 B / 14.8

E. FIRST ST / STATE ST B / 10.3 B / 14.6

Section 3

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 24

TABLE 3.5: Future Year 2030 Un-signalized Intersection Capacity Analyses

INTERSECTION/ APPROACH

LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) / DELAY (sec/veh)(1)

AM PM

W. FRONT ST / CENTRAL AVE B / 12.5 C / 19.9

E. FRONT ST / WILSON AVE B / 11.7 B / 12.2

E. FIRST ST / WILSON AVE B / 14.4 D / 25.3

E. FRONT ST / IMPERIAL ST B / 13.1 C / 17.8

E. FRONT ST / E. SECOND ST C / 22.9 D / 30.4

E. SECOND ST / WILSON AVE B / 10.3 C / 17.6

E. SECOND ALLEY / WILSON AVE B / 11.2 B / 11.9

E. SECOND ST / PINE ST B / 10.4 B / 13.7

E. SECOND ST / IMPERIAL ST B / 10.1 B / 14.0

Notes:

(1) LOS and delay shown are conditions for worst case conflicting movement of un-signalized intersection.

These results show that with a projected slight growth in traffic volumes along the study corridor and the existing intersection configurations (i.e. no improvements) most study intersections are expected to operate under capacity at LOS C or better in Year 2030 during both the morning and evening peak hours; with relatively small increases in average delay per vehicles. In approximately 20 years, delay on the unsignalized side street approaches of Wilson Avenue at First Street and East Second Street at Front Street will increase by approximately five (5) seconds and operate at LOS D with vehicles on these approaches waiting an average of about 30 seconds.

Section 3.2.6 Access Management

The Transportation Research Board (TRB) has defined access management as “...the systematic control of the location, spacing, design, and operation of driveways, median openings, interchanges, and street connections to a roadway. It also involves roadway design applications, such as median treatments and auxiliary lanes, and the appropriate spacing of traffic signals. The purpose of access management is to provide vehicular access to land development in a manner that preserves the safety and efficiency of the transportation system.”

Per PennDOT’s Access Management Model Ordinances for Pennsylvania Municipalities Handbook, “Access management is a means of controlling the ways in which vehicles can access major roadways, using techniques such as limiting the number of driveways and intersections with local roadways.” The main goals of access management are to improve safety and reduce congestion. According to the National Highway Institute, it has been shown that with an effective access management program,

Section 3

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 25

crashes can be reduced by up to 50 percent and roadway capacity can be increased by 23 to 45 percent, resulting in decreased delay and travel times.

Additionally, locations with difficult driveway access can result in driver frustration and low patronage. Motorists prefer to visit places of business that are easy to get into and out of.

With these goals in mind, and in working with the project steering committee, several driveways and intersections were investigated within the study corridor. These efforts included developing intersection sightline requirements as well as developing proposed driveway access modifications. The areas specifically mentioned as locations of concern included the Country Fair located on Wilson Avenue between Route 62 and East Second Street, and East Second Street. Proposed improvement options are discussed in more detail in Section 4 of this document.

Section 3.2.7 Transit

There is limited bus service in the Route 62 Corridor. There is one bus stop located on the eastern end of the Corridor on Imperial Street between Route 62 and East Second Street at the Giant Eagle parking lot. It has a shelter and street lighting (see photo at right). The transit stop is a part of the Oil City Route and Inter-City Route of the Venango Bus transit service offered throughout Venango County. The Oil City Route provides transportation services within the City of Oil City, while the Inter-City Route provides services and connection between Oil City, Franklin, and Cranberry Township.

Section 3.3 Existing Land Use

The Route 62 Transportation Corridor passes through Oil City’s South Side downtown area. Through a detailed analysis of the land uses, intensity of land uses and locations of basic needs and services, several distinct areas of the Route 62 Corridor are depicted in Figure 5 including:

Core Downtown – The Core Downtown can be described to include the properties to the west of Wilson Avenue. The core area extends from Wilson Avenue west to Petroleum Street and north to south from the River south to East Second Street. The Core area includes retail (sporting goods, home furnishings and gifts, antiques and appliances), professional and personal services, small eateries, public spaces, and several churches. The Core Downtown area also contains small pockets of transitional residential areas on Front Street and East Second Street. Such properties have the ability in the future to convert to mixed commercial properties. Oil City is distinct in that their Core Downtown area contains historical monuments within their transportation network on Central Avenue. Transition Mixed Commercial – Several areas, over decades of time, have changed the residential component of the Route 62 Corridor outside of the Core Downtown. Transitional Mixed Commercial areas are located on East Second Street between Wilson Avenue and Imperial Street as well as Petroleum Street between Orchard Street and West Second Street.

Section 3

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 26

Today, these mixed commercial properties contribute to the downtown and region’s business economy. Suburban Commercial – The northern edge of the Route 62 Corridor has transitioned from a rural landscape into a commercial corridor for suburban retail. This occurred as this area was redeveloped in the late 1950’s. Lot sizes are larger and not bound by alleyways. The roadway corridor is a comfortable width along East Second Street from Wilson Avenue to Allegheny Avenue. Lot sizes, building size and business signage are all visibly larger in the suburban commercial area of the Corridor. East Second Street is bound by Highway Commercial and Mixed Uses. Residential – Several blocks of residential living still exist within the study area, primarily on Third Street and Second Street. Two different types of residential areas exist within the Corridor:

Transitional Residential – Transitional Residential areas are located within or adjacent to areas that have transitioned over time into mixed commercial areas. These transitional residential areas exist along Second Street and primarily contain multi-family units, attached units and duplexes along with small scale to medium scale commercial uses. Pockets of transitional residential uses can be seen outside of the downtown core. Along the west side of Petroleum Street, single-family and multi-family residential units are surrounded by commercial and mixed uses. Traditional Residential – These traditional residential neighborhoods are designed to be walkable and are located within a short distance from the downtown, schools and churches. In the study area traditional neighborhood developments along both Second Street and Third Street can be characterized as less intensive and primarily contain single-family and multi-family residential units.

Industrial – The area bounded by the Allegheny River and the Route 62 four-lane is zoned Manufacturing and Industrial; however, the area was formerly a railroad yard and roundhouse and is now vacant land with one active rail line. Other Uses – Park and recreational land uses are located at the intersection of East Front Street and State Street.

The following figures describe the current land use within the study area and the surrounding blocks.

E 1S

T ST

E 2N

D ST

E FR

ON

T ST

E 3RD A

LY

E 3RD ST

E 4TH S

T

E 7T

H S

T

STATE ST

LEES

LN

E 6T

H S

T

HILA

ND A

VE

E 6T

H A

LY

HAZEL PL

PINE ST

E 7T

H A

LY

PETROLEUM ST

LONG ALY

E 5TH A

LY

W 5

TH S

TW 4

TH S

T

W 6

TH S

T

E 5T

H S

T

E 4TH ALY

LINDON ALY

EUCLID AVE

W 3

RD

ST

W 6

TH A

LY

E 8T

H A

LY

W 7

TH S

T

W 2

ND

ST

W 7

TH A

LY

W 1

ST S

T

HEM

LOC

K A

LY

COLBERT AVE

HILL

ST

E 2N

D A

LY

IMPERIAL ST

W 3

RD

ALY

W F

RO

NT

ST

SCH

OO

L ST

GRANT ST

ENGLEWOOD AVE

LIBERTY ST

W 5

TH A

LY

ALLEGHENY AVE

E BIS

SELL AVE

WILSON AVE

REED ST

ORANGE ST

HAROLD ST

CLARK A

LY

OR

CH

AR

D S

T

PUMPH

OUSE R

D

WALNUT ST

CHURCH ST

CENTRAL AVE

DIVISION ST

W 8

TH A

LY

HOFFMAN AVE

PENNSY

LVANIA

AVE

DIVISION ST

E 4T

H AL

Y

E 4T

H ALY

CENTRAL AVE

E 2N

D S

T

ALLEGHENY A

VE

E 5T

H A

LY

E 3R

D S

T

LINDON ALY

LINDON ALY

E 3R

D S

T

E 4T

H S

T

OR

CH

AR

D S

T

Fig

ur

e 7

Ro

ut

e 6

2C

or

rid

or

St

ud

y

Ve

na

ng

o C

ou

nt

y,

Pe

nn

sy

lv

an

ia

Oil

Cit

y

μO

ct

ob

er

20

10

So

ur

ce

: C

ity

of

Oil

Cit

y G

IS

& G

CC

A D

at

as

et

s.

La

nd

Us

e r

ev

ise

d b

y J

MT

, O

ct

ob

er

20

10

.

Cu

rr

en

t L

an

d U

se

030

060

015

0Fe

et

Lege

nd Stud

y Ar

ea B

ound

ary

Roa

d C

ente

rline

s

Parc

els

Cur

rent

Lan

d U

se

Sing

le F

amily

Res

iden

tial

Mul

ti Fa

mily

Res

iden

tial

Vaca

nt R

esid

entia

l

Mix

ed U

se

Park

s an

d R

ecre

atio

n

Publ

ic

Publ

ic E

duca

tion

Chu

rch

Cem

eter

y

Priv

ate

Educ

atio

n

Com

mer

cial

Dow

ntow

n C

omm

erci

al

Hig

hway

Com

mer

cial

Indu

stria

l

Vaca

nt

Section 3

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 29

Section 3.3.1 Northern Venango County Multi-Municipal Regional Plan

The Northern Venango County Multi-Municipal Regional Plan addresses land use, housing, transportation, community facilities, the protection of natural resources, and economic development throughout the Northern Venango County Region. The plan is divided into three sections by municipality. An overview of each municipality is provided with facts describing the future trends of each jurisdiction. Recommendations are provided to guide the municipalities towards areas of interest and changes that should be made.

The Northern Venango County Multi-Municipal Regional Plan is comprised of Cornplanter Township, City of Oil City, and Rouseville Borough. The Regional Plan is designed to address:

Use existing resources first—physical, governmental, or institutional. They should always be the primary options. Choose a few projects from the many presented by this Plan to accomplish in the first year to give the Plan implementation traction. Explore, use, and promote avenues to regional cooperation.

Cornplanter Township Cornplanter Township lies on the northern border of the three municipalities. Currently 2,687 residents live within the Township. The Township is the largest of the three municipalities with 23,872 acres or 37.3 square miles. The land within the Township is primarily publicly owned land (Oil Creek State Park and Game Lands 253). Lightly settled residential developments are focused around small villages within the Township. Housing conditions within the Township were rated as being good. The majority of housing is single-family units (90%) and mobile homes (8.7%). The number of housing units has declined from 1990 to 2000, but on average five (5) to six (6) units are being built annually. The Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission recognizes Pithole City as being historically significant. Large mineral extraction within the region has led to focused efforts on preserving the beauty of the natural environment. Currently, the exploration for natural gas within the Township is occurring with two drilling rig permits acquired.

City of Oil City The City of Oil City is one of the major arterial corridors within Venango County. Base upon the 2000 census, 11,504 residents lived within Oil City, which encompasses 4.7 square miles. The US Census Board has estimated the population within Oil City has decreased annually since the 2000 census to 10,502 residents. The discovery and exploration of oil in the region as well as the geographic proximity to the Allegheny River helped to develop an early trading and shipping center. Heavy industrial uses within the region led to the widespread railroad network. Early development in Oil City was prominent around the water, thus small lots and homes were built so workers could walk to and from work. Nearly 17 percent or 497 acres of the City is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Housing is a major concern on both the north and south side of Town. The overabundant amount of housing available within Oil City coupled with the poor housing market has led many units to become dilapidated or vacant. The Oil City Fire Department and the Oil City Police Department patrol and oversee the City. Recreational uses (parks and trails) and community facilities (library) are provided within the City. Transit and bus services are also provided throughout the City.

Section 3

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 30

Rouseville Borough Rouseville Borough has gone through much change over the past fifty years. The change has not involved new construction; instead the area has seen significant demolition of commercial buildings and generally far less retail activity. The primary difference during this time period was the closure and demolition of the Pennzoil refinery and offices that were located in the heart of Rouseville. Currently 429 residents live within the Borough of Rouseville, which encompasses 0.9 square miles. The majority of the Borough is comprised of residential land uses. A large portion of the residential housing community lies east of Route 8 and north of Route 227. Smaller pockets of residential development can be found south of Cherry Run and to the east of Route 8. Development has been limited in the Borough due to steep slopes and widespread floodplains. There is very little commercial and industrial land uses remaining in the Borough. Buildings remain vacant from commercial and industrial uses that have left the Borough. The housing market is very slow within the Borough due to poor economic conditions. The Rouseville Volunteer Fire Department and Borough park are community facilities and services that are provided to the residents.

Regional Initiatives A regional task force has been created with the three municipalities and the County to address the basic needs for the region. Four task force teams will address policies relating to land use, housing, community facilities and public safety.

The Regional Transportation Plan The primary funding source for transportation projects in the region is the United States Department of Transportation. The Regional Transportation Plan identifies transportation projects that will include upgrades to transit, rail, roadways and highways.

Economic Plan The economic status throughout the Cornplanter – Oil City – Rouseville Area (COR) has remained constant or unchanged. Cornplanter Township and Rouseville Borough have seen a decrease in median household income from 1990 to 2000, whereas Oil City experienced an increase in median household income over the same time period. Opportunities for economic development exist within the region. Tourism and retail are the main providers of revenue to the current status of the Region’s economic value. Tourism is one of Venango County’s major industries. Tourism provides a large source of revenue for the Region as well as employment opportunities. Oil City is the most prominent location for retail within the three municipalities; however, retail trade has been declining in Oil City over the past decades. Advanced manufacturing, health care, and energy are three sectors that appear to be potential growth opportunities for the Region’s economy.

Other Plans and Policies The Bike Trail is a major priority for the Oil Region Alliance. The Bike Trail Plan suggests positive additions to the current bikeways plan and recommendations for continued trail improvement. The Oil City Bike Trail and Justus Trail are designated as being segments of the main stem of the Erie to Pittsburgh Trail which is now being linked and developed. The ARTS and Culture Plan strives to make Oil City a destination for artists. The National Transit Building currently houses 25 artist tenants in the North Side downtown. New businesses and existing businesses are relocating to the downtown where the revival of the Arts is taking place.

Section 3

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 31

Transportation and land use improvements recommended as a part of the Route 62 Smart Transportation study need to be focused on the retail and tourism opportunities available within the City of Oil City. The improvements should be focused on a multi-modal approach that not only enhances the existing motor vehicle network, but also promotes pedestrian safety, transit use and commuter and recreational bicycle facilities.

Section 3.4 Open Space and Greenways

Section 3.4.1 Venango County Greenways Plan

The Venango County Greenways Plan is a part of the Northwest Pennsylvania Greenways Planning effort. The Northwest Planning and Development Commission completed the multi-county effort for six counties.

Venango County is plentiful with recreational opportunities. These natural resources are important to the County and the surrounding Region. These resources include:

The Oil Heritage Region: The Region is historically significant for its legacy as the creation of the petroleum industry. Artifacts, scenic vistas, and museums are a few of the incredible areas to explore within the Region. Oil Creek State Park: The Park is approximately 6,250 acres and is located in the Oil Creek Valley. Drake Well Museum and Park is situated immediately north and east of Oil Creek State Park. Two High Quality Streams (Cherry Run and Little Sandy Creek) and two Exceptional Value Streams (Hemlock Creek and Dennison Run) Important Bird Areas Washington’s Trail: Historic and scenic route commemorating George Washington’s first military and diplomatic journey Allegheny River: The River stretches from its northern headwater in central Potter County downstream to Pittsburgh. The 325-mile river flows into the Monongahela to form the Ohio River in Pittsburgh. French Creek North Country National Scenic Trail: The Trail encompasses 4,600 miles from its western point in North Dakota to its eastern point in New York.

Through conservation and proper planning efforts to preserve greenways and their corridors in Venango County, future generations will be able to experience these exceptional resources.

Greenways provide a vast number of recreational opportunities for visitors. A greenway may offer trails for hiking, jogging, biking, canoeing / kayaking, and other outdoor recreational activities. Greenways also create naturally occurring buffers that separate developed and non-developed lands. These aspects present benefits to local municipalities and their residents. Benefits would include:

Promotes environmentally sound land development Promotes land and water restoration Encourages a network of non-motorized and motorized land and water transportation corridors to connect people to our resources

Section 3

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 32

Explores opportunities to expand motorized off-highway vehicle and snowmobile trail opportunities Conserves natural resource infrastructure resources Builds capacity at the local level for implementation and encourages economic development Promotes healthy living Enhances the quality of life

The Venango County Greenways Plan defines implementation strategies that must be put in place in order to create the vision for greenways in Venango County. The County has the opportunity to complete the following tasks if the recommendations are fulfilled.

Guide growth and development in a sustainable manner Improve the economy in Venango County by enhancing tourism opportunities and venues and by providing goods and services to meet the needs of our residents and tourists Provide alternate forms of transportation to improve air and water quality and to reduce traffic congestion Connect its residents and neighborhoods to one another, as well as its parks, schools, and cultural and natural resources Conserve natural resources, which provide life sustaining functions and create the character of place, for current and future generations of Venango County residents

Proposed facilities identified in the plan are shown on Figure 9.

The Venango County Greenway is consistent with the Smart Transportation approach to make trails an integral part of the overall transportation network.

Section 3.4.2 Oil City Comprehensive Waterways Plan

The City of Oil City has contracted with Mackin Engineering Company to develop a Comprehensive Waterways Plan for the City focused on identifying opportunities and developing strategies that would enhance the waterfront at eight (8) key locations along the Allegheny River and Oil Creek. In addition, general corridor-wide recommendations are also being included in the Plan. The evaluation of each of the eight areas provided recommendations pertaining to the following:

Recreational Enhancements Economic Development Opportunities Access Management Educational Opportunities Aesthetic Enhancements

The Waterways Plan has made initial recommendations for the area of the South Side Business District, including designating a white-water loop under the Veteran’s Memorial Bridge (State Street), improving River access for fishing and boating, and redeveloping and strengthening the south side business section. Recommendations have also been made with regard to the Siverly Railroad Bridge, which connects the City’s Siverly neighborhood to the south side commercial and residential areas.

Section 3

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 33

The Waterways Plan was not complete at the time of finalization of this Smart Transportation Study. Implementation of the recommendations developed through this Smart Transportation study should consider the final recommendations of the Waterways Plan.

Figure 9: Venango County Greenways

Section 3

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 34

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

Section 4

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 35

Smart Transportation Principles

� Solutions tailored to the context of the community.

� Approach and solution tailored to meet specific project needs.

� Projects planned in collaboration with the community.

� Solutions address needs for alternative modes of transportation.

� Solutions formulated using sound professional judgment.

� Scale of the solution is designed based upon the problem.

Section 4.0 Analysis of Improvement Options and Solutions The Smart Transportation principles provided a guide for the collaborative planning process, including the development of improvement options and solutions for the south side of Oil City that enhance the Route 62 Corridor and surrounding study area. The solutions identified through the planning process are focused on addressing the critical issues by improving the quality of the area within the study and developing a plan for transportation and land use improvements that promote safety and encourage development/re-development opportunities within the south side.

Section 4.1 Front Street (Route 62) Corridor

The Front Street (Route 62) Corridor currently consists of a four-lane road from Pumphouse Road to Wilson Avenue. Front Street can be accessed from First Street/Wilson Avenue, Imperial Street, Second Street and Pumphouse Road. In addition, vehicles traveling east along Front Street have access to the CVS parking area via a right-in/right-out access point. The existing traffic volumes, which are consistent with future volumes, are low enough to allow for a potential “road diet” along the Front Street Corridor. In addition to a potential reduction of travel lanes, the Front Street Corridor could also be enhanced to provide for bicycle and pedestrian facilities, as well as additional traffic calming through the use of roundabouts at the First Street/Wilson Avenue and Second Street intersections. Road Diet The term “road diet” is associated with the reduction of travel lanes along a roadway while still providing a facility that meets the current and future traffic demand. The proposed lane reduction would reduce the existing four-lane roadway (two lanes in each direction) to a three-lane roadway, which would include one lane per direction and a left turn lane/median area. The elimination of two thru lanes would allow sufficient space for the median/left turn area, as well as designated pedestrian/bicycle facilities. The median area would provide an opportunity for a landscaped area to provide a more welcoming entrance to the City’s south side. The goal of the pedestrian/bicycle facilities would be to provide a sidewalk facility on the south side of Front Street and a shared-use facility on the north side. These improvements should also help to reduce the travel speeds along this section of Front Street. Implementation of the “road diet” improvements could be completed in a phased approach. The initial phase would reduce the number of travel lanes through pavement marking improvements which would provide a cost-effective means for calming traffic entering the City. The second phase would implement the full improvements which would include a curb, median, pedestrian/bicycle facilities and landscape plantings. Coupled with the “road diet” (under either the initial phase or full improvements) would be the reconfiguration of the Wilson Avenue approach at its intersection with First Street and Front Street,

Section 4

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 36

reducing it to a single-lane approach. The existing two-lane configuration adds to driver confusion and reduced sight distance for vehicles on Wilson Avenue. Thus, a single-lane approach should improve safety.

A traffic capacity analysis was performed at the following unsignalized study area intersections with the three-lane concept on Front Street, and the single-lane concept on Wilson Avenue:

Front Street/Wilson Avenue First Street/Wilson Avenue Front Street/Imperial Street Front Street/East Second Street

As shown in Table 4.1 below, the results of the intersection capacity analysis with 2009 traffic volumes indicate that acceptable LOS D or better would be provided with the proposed three-lane configuration; LOS D operations would occur on the stop-controlled side street at the First Street/Wilson Avenue and Front Street/East Second Street intersections during the PM peak hour. Comparing this with the existing conditions analysis (Table 3.3) reveals that delays would increase slightly in the AM peak hour and moderately in the PM peak hour.

TABLE 4.1: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analyses for 3-Lane

Wilson Avenue to East Second Street

INTERSECTION/ APPROACH

LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) / DELAY (sec/veh)(1)

2009 with 3-lane Configuration

2030 with 3-lane Configuration

AM PM AM PM

E. FRONT ST / WILSON AVE C / 18.2 C / 23.8 C / 22.0 D / 33.9

E. FIRST ST / WILSON AVE B / 14.7 D / 31.6 C / 16.1 F / 50.4

E. FRONT ST / IMPERIAL ST B / 14.6 C / 19.9 C / 16.0 C / 23.7

E. FRONT ST / E. SECOND ST C / 20.1 D / 25.5 C / 22.9 D / 30.5

Notes:

(1) LOS and delay shown are conditions for worst case conflicting movement of unsignalized intersection.

Section 4

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 37

In Year 2030 with the three-lane configuration, LOS C conditions would exist at all intersections during the AM peak hour. During the PM peak hour all but the intersection of First Street/Wilson Avenue would operate at LOS D or better; the Wilson Avenue approach at First Street would experience LOS F conditions with vehicles on Wilson Avenue waiting approximately 50 seconds on average before proceeding through the intersection. Therefore, additional long-term improvements were considered at the First Street/Wilson Avenue intersection and are discussed below. Roundabouts Improvements to the Front Street corridor could include roundabouts at the First Street/Wilson Avenue intersection and/or the Second Street intersection. The inclusion of a single-lane roundabout at either of these locations would provide a means of traffic calming as motor vehicles enter the downtown area. In addition, the roundabout at the First Street/Wilson Avenue intersection would provide a gateway to the City of Oil City’s south side. Sufficient space is available to provide a roundabout at this location that incorporates the existing fountain into the center island, while minimizing impacts to surrounding properties and businesses. It appears that constructing a roundabout at the Second Street intersection would be more challenging and potentially costly than at the First Street/Wilson Avenue intersection for several reasons, including anticipated right-of-way impacts, roadway geometry, and the potential for a retaining wall adjacent to the railroad tracks to limit grading impacts and the need for track relocation. For these reasons, analysis of traffic operations of a roundabout at the Second Street intersection was not performed. A traffic analysis using the PennDOT roundabout evaluation spreadsheet was conducted for a roundabout at the First Street/Wilson Avenue intersection. One of the evaluation measures used in this analysis is the volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio of the approaches to the roundabout; this measure is the ratio of the demand volume on the approach to the capacity (how much volume the roadway can handle) of the approach. For the roundabout analysis, a v/c ratio of 0.85 (or 85% of the capacity) is accepted as the threshold of acceptable level of service (LOS). The results of the analysis of the First Street/Wilson Avenue roundabout for existing traffic volumes and future year 2030 traffic volume projections showed that all roundabout approaches would operate below an acceptable volume to capacity (v/c) ratio of 0.85. A more detailed roundabout traffic analysis of the First Street/Wilson Avenue intersection was performed using the SIDRA traffic engineering software. The results of this analysis were consistent with the PennDOT roundabout spreadsheet. The SIDRA analyses showed a LOS A operation for the overall roundabout for 2009 and 2030 traffic volumes during the AM and PM peak hours. All approaches are expected to operate below an acceptable v/c ratio of 0.85; the worst approach would be First Street operating below a v/c ratio of 0.74. Based upon the level of service analysis, a roundabout would operate more efficiently during existing and future (2030) traffic conditions when compared to stop-controlled intersection. The results of the SIDRA analyses are contained in Appendix E.

Section 4

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 38

Smart Transportation � Solutions tailored to the context of

the community. � Approach and solution tailored to

meet specific project needs. � Projects planned in collaboration

with the community. � Solutions address needs for

alternative modes of transportation. � Solutions formulated using sound

professional judgment. � Scale of the solution is designed

based upon the problem.

Section 4.2 Streetscape Improvements

The primary goal of streetscape improvements within the study area will be to develop a consistent pedestrian facility that meets user expectancy while providing a safe and aesthetically pleasing means of transportation for pedestrians. Streetscape improvements need to be planned and designed to meet two unique areas within the project study area. These areas include the downtown core area bounded by First Street, Petroleum Street, Wilson Avenue and Front Street, as well as the residential area located outside of the downtown core along Second Street. Within the downtown core of the south side of Oil City, the focus of the streetscape improvements will be to bring together transportation improvements with land use, and coordinate pedestrian facilities within the business and commercial districts of the study area. Improvements in this area are to include full streetscape enhancements, including the following:

Concrete sidewalks

Decorative brick pavers (buffer area)

Pedestrian lighting

Traffic Signal Improvements

Amenities (Benches, Trash receptacles, Bicycle Racks)

Decorative crosswalks

ADA curb ramps

Infrastructure Improvements (Water & Stormwater Improvements)

Street trees

Signage

The streetscape improvements along the Second Street corridor would have the same focus, including providing a safe and aesthetically pleasing facility for the pedestrians. However, the design would be less elaborate than the downtown core area and would be designed to establish dependable pedestrian facilities which adhere to the current ADA guidelines. Providing such improvements would present the residential area of the study area as being comfortable, inviting, and having a safe environment. A critical component of the pedestrian facilities in any area is adherence to current ADA guidelines, including ADA curb ramps. PennDOT is focused on upgrading the ADA curb ramps throughout the state. The City will need to work closely with PennDOT to understand their future roadway maintenance and construction project schedule as it relates to state routes within the study area. It is recommended that the City coordinate closely with PennDOT with the goal that all ramps at a given intersection are improved at one time and meet the aesthetic standards that are associated with future streetscape improvements.

Section 4

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 39

Smart Transportation � Solutions tailored to the context of

the community. � Approach and solution tailored to

meet specific project needs. � Projects planned in collaboration

with the community. � Solutions address needs for

alternative modes of transportation. � Solutions formulated using sound

professional judgment. � Scale of the solution is designed

based upon the problem.

Section 4.3 Access Management

Opportunities for access management can be found within the study area along Wilson Avenue and East Second Street. The following summarizes some of the access management techniques that could be applied to this Corridor.

Country Fair Store/Wilson Avenue/East Second Street As it exists, the segment of Wilson Avenue between First and Second Street sees a lot of activity from both vehicles and pedestrians. In particular, this area is not clearly delineated to separate vehicle traffic on the roadway, vehicle traffic entering/exiting Country Fair, and pedestrians walking in the area. Five access management techniques that could be made in this area to better delineate vehicle and pedestrian areas include:

Driveway delineation – eliminate the wide open driveway access on Wilson Avenue and First Street by adding channelization and islands Driveway consolidation – eliminate the driveway on East Second Street due to its proximity to Wilson Avenue Cross access with CVS – provide a cross access connection from Country Fair to CVS, which would allow County Fair patrons to access Second Street via the existing CVS driveway Pedestrian Sidewalks – improve pedestrian delineation by adding more sidewalk area Street closure – eliminate the confusing roadway split of Wilson Avenue south of Second Street

US Post Office/Thorne’s Market This area could benefit by adding cross access between the USPS parking lot and Thorne’s Market parking lot. It was observed that there were shoppers parking in Thorne’s lot and entering the USPS building. In addition to providing a cross access, one of the existing Thorne’s Market driveway openings could be eliminated to reduce the number of access points along Second Street.

Imperial Street Imperial Street runs between Rite Aid and Giant Eagle. The area is currently wide open with no delineation. Tractor trailers were observed turning from Front Street onto Imperial Street. There are existing driveways on Imperial Street less than 100’ from Front Street. This creates a situation where sight distance is limited for turn vehicles. This area could benefit from better driveway delineation. Providing an entry throat on Imperial Street for approximately 100’ south of Front Street would eliminate vehicle conflicts at the driveways with vehicles turning from Front Street. Head-in parking could be maintained if necessary for Rite-Aid and the wide open access to Giant Eagle could be reduced to one or two standard sized driveway openings.

Section 4

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 40

East Second Street from Imperial Street to Front Street Due to the narrow lot depth between East Second Street and Front Street, there is less opportunity for shared/cross access in this area. However, existing driveway openings could be narrowed to standard widths to provide better delineation and shorten pedestrian crossings of driveways.

Concept sketches illustrating the proposed access management improvements, as well as a draft model access management ordinance are contained in Appendix H.

Section 4

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 41

Smart Transportation � Solutions tailored to the context of

the community. � Approach and solution tailored to

meet specific project needs. � Projects planned in collaboration

with the community. � Solutions address needs for

alternative modes of transportation. � Solutions formulated using sound

professional judgment. � Scale of the solution is designed

based upon the problem.

Section 4.4 Traffic Signalization Plan

A traffic signal study was performed along the Route 62 Corridor at each of the key study area intersections between Petroleum Street and Wilson Avenue. Using the intersection traffic volumes collected from the intersection turning movement counts, Traffic Signal Warrant 2 (Four-Hour Warrant) and Traffic Signal Warrant 3 (Peak Hour Warrant) contained in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) were examined. The volume counts were made during the week and did not consider weekend traffic, which could be considerably higher. The results of these analyses showed that the existing traffic volumes at the following intersections do not meet the minimum volume criteria to warrant a traffic signal (see Appendix I for the detailed worksheets of the warrant analyses):

First Street/Petroleum Street First Street/Central Avenue First Street/State Street

The pedestrian volumes collected during the intersection manual turning movement traffic counts was also reviewed and compared with the criteria for MUTCD Traffic Signal Warrant 4 (Pedestrian Volume). The existing pedestrian crossings across First Street (the major street) at any of these intersections did not meet the minimum 100 crossings per hour. Intersection capacity analyses were then performed at these three (3) intersections for 2009 and 2030 traffic to determine impacts on traffic operations and anticipated delays that would be anticipated if these existing traffic signals were removed. Multi-lane approaches at stop controlled intersections can lead to driver confusion; therefore, single-lane approaches were used for all intersection approaches. These analyses showed that for all-way stop control with a single lane on all intersection approaches Petroleum Street would experience LOS F conditions with an average vehicle stop control delay of over one minute during the PM peak hour. This could result in vehicles queuing back into the Front Street/Petroleum Street intersection and across the bridge. This is already known to occur during weekend peak traffic volumes. Two lanes exist now on Petroleum Street at the intersection of First Street to allow a single left turning lane separate from the right turn/straight through lane. Two lanes also exist on the approach of West First Street onto Petroleum, providing separate left turn and right turn/straight through lanes. For these reasons, the removal of the traffic signal at First Street/Petroleum Street is not recommended and was removed from further consideration.

The capacity analyses for single-lane approaches at the First Street/Central Avenue intersection showed that with current traffic volumes and all-way stop control, all approaches would operate acceptably at LOS C or better during both the morning and evening peak hours.

Section 4

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 42

It should be noted that following a pedestrian fatality that occurred at the intersection of First Street/Central Avenue, the Oil Valley Chapter of the PA Council of the Blind requested the City of Oil City to upgrade the traffic signal to provide audible pedestrian traffic signal operation. This upgrade would include an exclusive pedestrian signal phase, meaning pedestrians would be able to cross the intersection while all vehicles would be stopped. In order to provide this exclusive pedestrian movement, the traffic signal at First Street/Central Avenue must be maintained. The capacity analyses performed for current traffic volumes and single-lane approaches at the First Street/State Street intersection showed that the First Street approach would operate at capacity LOS E during the evening peak hour. This delay would increase in time with an increase in traffic volumes. With the traffic signal and current weekday traffic volumes, the intersection runs at LOS A or B. With increased volumes, signal timings can be adjusted to relieve the Route 62 straight-through traffic. Therefore, it is recommended the traffic signal be maintained. The traffic signal warrant analyses also showed that based on existing traffic volumes, traffic signals are not currently warranted at the following unsignalized intersections; however, peak weekend traffic counts should be collected at these intersections and analyzed prior to any traffic control modifications:

Front Street/Central Avenue Front Street/Wilson Avenue First Street/Wilson Avenue

Section 4

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 43

Smart Transportation � Solutions tailored to the context of

the community. � Approach and solution tailored to

meet specific project needs. � Projects planned in collaboration

with the community. � Solutions address needs for

alternative modes of transportation. � Solutions formulated using sound

professional judgment. � Scale of the solution is designed

based upon the problem.

Section 4.5 Wye Bridge Improvements

Pedestrian connections across the Allegheny River, connecting the south side to the north side, include the State Street and Petroleum Street bridges. These two bridges are in proximity to one another and provide a direct connection to the two downtown core areas of each of the north and south sides. There is also an existing Wye Railroad bridge which crosses the Allegheny River east of the State Street Bridge, near the eastern limits of the study area. The bridge is currently posted for “no pedestrians;” however it is commonly used by pedestrians. The bridge connects the Siverly residential neighborhood on the north side to the commercial, residential and other areas on the south side. The Wye Bridge contains an active rail line which services Continental Plastic Containers approximately three to four times per month. Improvements to the existing bridge would be a strategic solution to provide pedestrian and bicycle use to connect the north and south sides of the river. Improvements to the bridge could include a new trail surface with a railing/fence to separate the trail from the active rail line, lighting, and repainting of the structure. Such improvements would provide a safe and convenient access and could be tied into other improvements such as open space or trail improvements.

Section 4

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 44

Smart Transportation � Solutions tailored to the context of

the community. � Approach and solution tailored to

meet specific project needs. � Projects planned in collaboration

with the community. � Solutions address needs for

alternative modes of transportation. � Solutions formulated using sound

professional judgment. � Scale of the solution is designed

based upon the problem.

Section 4.6 Greenway / Trail

Open space along the southern banks of the Allegheny River provides a convenient opportunity for a hiker/biker trail within the study area. The proposed trail could stretch from the Veteran’s Memorial Bridge to the Wye Railroad Bridge and connect to future trail extensions. The goal of this improvement is to create a pedestrian facility that promotes pedestrian and bicycle use, serving recreational, as well as transportation, purposes. The proposed 10’ wide facility would consist of a handicapped accessible trail surface similar to the high standard surfaces used throughout the Oil Region system of trails. By introducing this improvement along with the Wye Bridge improvement, City residents could enjoy a healthier way of living through safe walking and biking, and also through a reduction in automobile use, noise, air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.

Section 4

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 45

Smart Transportation � Solutions tailored to the context of

the community. � Approach and solution tailored to

meet specific project needs. � Projects planned in collaboration

with the community. � Solutions address needs for

alternative modes of transportation. � Solutions formulated using sound

professional judgment. � Scale of the solution is designed

based upon the problem.

Section 4.7 Public Plaza

The proposed public plaza is located adjacent to the First Street and Front Street intersection. The goal of this improvement is to create a beautiful pedestrian gathering facility within the study area in a location that is positioned close to the downtown core area of the south side, as well as access to the views and potential recreational opportunities along the Allegheny River. Improvements in this area should also consider the final recommendations contained in the City’s Comprehensive Waterways Plan. The proposed plaza space could include an open space area that includes the existing pavilion. The open space area would provide a year-round passive space. The open space could also be used for special events, including the Oil Heritage Festival and other community events. Elements of the plaza space would need to include a retaining wall to increase the level area at the Front Street elevation. The level area could be constructed of concrete sidewalk, concrete paver sidewalk, a combination of concrete and concrete paver sidewalk or another type of hard walkway surface. The plaza would provide a river overlook outlined by an appropriate height railing. Potential exists for the plaza area to include a seating area, possibly integrated within a series of retaining/seating walls, to provide bleacher type seating for viewing of kayaking or other events along the river. The plaza area would need to provide pedestrian access to other potential improvements within the area. This would include a pedestrian walkway to the downtown core via the Front Street and State Street intersection, a pedestrian walkway to the commercial area via the Front Street and First Street intersection and pedestrian access to a future trail along the Allegheny River via an ADA accessible ramp from the plaza area to the lower banks of the river. Other key elements of the Public Plaza would include appropriate scaled lighting to provide the necessary security and site furnishings including benches, trash receptacles and bicycle racks.

Section 4

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 46

Section 4.8 Land Use and Economic Development Opportunities

Coordinating land use, economic development and transportation is considered a facet of “smart growth” or “sustainable development.” This section explores opportunities for land use and economic development based upon transportation system enhancements increasing viable options for people to access opportunities, goods, services and other resources that improve the quality of life for City residents as well as residents of the region. The goal is to create a balance of mixed uses including housing, educational, employment, recreational, retail and service opportunities within the South Side Business District through:

improved access; increased variety of consumer goods and services within clusters; increased spending for consumer goods and services from residents of the City and region; enhanced amenities and aesthetics to provide an inviting environment for residents, businesses, shoppers and visitors; and improved regulation of land use and building condition to support business development.

Section 4.8.1 Methods for Determining a Balanced Mix of Uses

The following outlines the methods for assessment and analysis to support development of revitalization strategies with respect to land use and economic development opportunities:

Assessing Building and Business Inventory Business Community SWOT Analysis and Visual Preference Survey Analyzing the Business Mix using a Gap Analysis Analyzing Local Economics Revitalization Strategies

Section 4.8.2 Assessing Building and Business Inventory

A building and business inventory provides the foundation for describing, understanding, and restructuring the economy of the business district and downtown area. The “Route 8 and Route 62 Corridor Evaluation” performed by Hickory Engineering in 2005 generated a database of all buildings, land parcels, and properties along Route 62 in Oil City and detailed building condition reports and adaptive use/reuse plans for two buildings in the current Route 62 study area - the Latonia Theater building at 1 East First Street and the C. F. Cramer block at 2-30 West Front Street. Some basic information has been compiled as part of the current Route 62 Smart Transportation Study with respect to building condition, use/occupancy and business type for each structure located in the core of the South Side Business District. Over time, this information can be routinely updated and augmented with more detailed assessment and analysis. A summary of this information is depicted on maps and street profiles contained in Section 5. Based upon the information assembled, assessed and analyzed to date, the following key issues of concern have been identified with respect to building condition and business type. Key issues of concern with respect to building condition and integrity include:

Underutilization of first floor space; Vacant and underutilized upper floor space; Substandard minor and major conditions of upper floors and roof damage to several buildings; and

Section 4

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 47

Façade modifications altering original architectural character of the building detracts from the physical appearance and aesthetics of the environment.

Key issues of concern with respect to business inventory include: Quality of business establishments; Lack of business clusters with respect to specialty stores; Although a cluster of restaurants is in place, a more robust mix is necessary to achieve higher attraction rates; Although a cluster of retail operations with convenience and household items exists, a more robust mix is necessary to achieve higher attraction rates; and Lack of business services available.

Section 4.8.3 Business Community SWOT Analysis and Visual Preference Survey

The South Side Business Association participated in the planning process and was actively engaged in discussions about study area strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats as well as provided responses to a Visual Preference Survey (VPS). The results of each of these activities is summarized in Appendix A: Community Participation Report. Input received from the business community was used to guide technical analysis and strategy development contained in this section.

Section 4.8.4 Analyzing the Business Mix using a Gap Analysis

A Gap Analysis was conducted for three areas within a defined trade area. Retail spending was assessed considering the trade area as the study area plus an eight-mile radius. Within this trade area retail spending was also assessed for the study area, Oil City (an approximate two-mile radius around the study area) and Oil City with an eight-mile radius. The Gap Analysis was used to analyze the business mix indicating the general areas where opportunity gaps as well as surplus gaps may be for retail goods and services. The following briefly describes an opportunity and surplus gap. Refer to Appendix F for a detailed GAP Analysis for Oil City and the surrounding area defined as the Trade Area for this analysis. Opportunity and surplus gaps can be defined as follows:

An opportunity gap occurs when a household must resort to spending their retail dollars on goods and services outside their neighborhood or locale due to one or more of the following conditions:

The specific type of retail opportunity does not exist in the neighborhood; The quality of goods and services is simply better outside the region; The existing retail establishments do not carry enough product to service the neighborhood;

or The type of retail goods or services does not meet the needs of the neighborhood residents.

This circumstance is referred to as an opportunity gap because, due to reasons mentioned, there is the potential for new or expansion of existing businesses to meet local demands.

A surplus gap occurs when local retail sales of goods and services exceed household spending for goods and services. A surplus indicates that local retail stores are making sales to non-local households. This circumstance is referred to as a surplus because it indicates that locally there are more goods and

Section 4

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 48

services than the actual number of household residents can consume. If the surplus gap is exceptional or unique to a specific locality, this type of repeating expenditures could be considered a “niche” within a market area. The opportunity gaps indicating the expenditure of local dollars outside the community (goods and services not adequately provided for in the local community) and the surplus gaps of goods and services provided in the City or Surrounding Area are further identified and quantified in Appendix G: Gap Analysis. The results of this analysis can be used to identify business development opportunities, such as those identified on the following table, identifies areas to target business development in the context of physical space and configuration of land use patterns in a small town business district. The following information identifies potential opportunities to establish business clusters and niche businesses in vacant and underutilized space as well as in occupied space as uses change. The information presented represents the unmet demand for retail goods and services within the Trade Area. These opportunities should be viewed as areas for further exploration with current businesses and prospective business owners on a small scale. The information in the table below indicates the maximum amount of space that could supply goods and services to meet the demand for those services purchased outside of the Trade Area.

TABLE 4.2: Business Cluster and Niche Business Development Opportunities based upon Consumer Spending Outside of Trade Area

Business Type

Annual Opportunity

Gap in Target Area

Business Expansion or Business Development Opportunity

Demand for Maximum Square Footage within Target Area

($150-$250 in sales/sq. foot) Restaurants

Full-Service Restaurant $9,318,130 3,727 - 6,212

Limited-Service Eating Place $14,255,402 57,021 – 95,036

Special Food Services $3,499,081 13,996 – 23,327

Specialty Niches

Camera and Photographic Equipment Store $377,033 1,508 – 2,513

Luggage and Leather Goods $247,418 989 – 1,649

Hobby, Toy and Game Store $793,444 3,173 – 5,289

Book Store and Newsstand $820,772 3,283 – 5,471

Gift, Stationery, Office Supply and Novelty Store $1,157,137 4,628 – 7,714

Sporting Goods Store $3,688,326 14,753 – 24,588

Music and Musical Instrument Store $360,635 1,442 – 2,404

The rule of thumb for determining the amount of space for retail use is minimum $150 of sales per square foot. Based upon Gap Analysis results, stores with first-floor and second-floor spaces consisting of 1,000 -2,000 and 3,000 square feet can be physically and financially supported in the South Side Downtown District.

Section 4

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 49

Section 4.8.5 Analyzing Local Characteristics

The following table provides key demographics for the Study Area and Trade Area.

TABLE 4.3: Key Demographics for the Study Area and Trade Area

Demographic Oil City Study Area Oil City (2-Mile

Radius) Oil City Surrounding Area (8-Mile Radius)

Population

2015 Projection 6,303 12,338 32,023

2010 Estimate 6,630 12,928 33,485

Target Age Groups

18-20 144 3.8% 262 3.6% 614 3.3%

21-24 181 4.8% 316 4.3% 747 4.0%

25-34 436 11.5% 809 11.0% 1,979 10.5%

35-44 562 14.8% 1,082 14.7% 2,857 15.2%

45-54 519 13.7% 972 13.2% 2,601 13.8%

55-64 305 8.1% 633 8.6% 1,875 10.0%

Households

2015 Projection 2,690 5,260 13,495

2010 Estimate 2,811 5,467 13,988

Target Household Size

1-person 981 32.7% 1,813 31.4% 4,257 29.0%

2-persons 894 29.8% 1,850 32.1% 5,034 34.3%

3 or more persons 1,123 37.5% 2,107 36.5% 2,355 36.7%

Households by Target Incomes

$50,000 – $74,999 453 15.1% 922 15.9% 2,437 16.5%

$75,000 - $99,999 99 3.3% 252 4.3% 847 5.7%

$100,000+ 98 3.3% 211 3.6% 648 4.4%

Tenure of occupied Housing Units

Owner Occupied 1,814 60.5% 3,778 65.5% 10,533 71.7%

Renter Occupied 1,183 39.5% 1,990 34.5% 4,162 28.3%

Employed within Target Area

Working within Target Area 1,394 46.7% 2,539 45.1% 6,518 44.4%

Working outside of Target Area 1,590 53.3% 3,091 54.9% 8,149 55.6% Source: Claritas MarketPlace – 2010 The Nielsen Company.

Section 4.8.6 Revitalization Strategies

The following describes various revitalization strategies targeted to the South Side Business District and Route 62 Corridor. �Transportation Investments Consistent with Land Use Planning and Development

Smart transportation solutions outlined in Section 2 that generally: Enhance or improve accessibility, mobility and safety for all modes of transportation (i.e. vehicular; Provide adequate access and space for loading and unloading of goods, materials and supplies;

Section 4

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 50

Provide sufficient design of space at intersections for truck turning movements; Provide transit connections and pedestrian and bicycle safety improvements with connections to open space and recreational areas; and Provide amenities for pedestrians as part of streetscape elements.

�Upper Floor Usage & Building Rehabilitation

A considerable number of structures within the core of the South Side Business District have vacant or underutilized (storage) upper floors. Second floor use for retail and office space is important as well as upper floor use for apartments, and should be targeted for this area. One important factor is the condition of upper floors in the South Side Business District. Many of the upper floors require substantial or major rehabilitation resulting in considerable private or public-private investment. Programs and incentives should be developed to support rehabilitation of structures.

Office uses play an important role in supporting the expansion or addition of retail space. Office uses such as real estate agents, mortgage brokers, accountants, doctors’ offices and lawyers, if signed appropriately, can benefit from a second or third floor location above a vibrant retail establishment. Build upon existing loan programs, including the Oil Region Alliance’s Revolving Loan Fund for Route 8/62 for historic preservation and/or increased adaptive reuse, by developing a Mixed-Use Rehabilitation Loan Program with requirements for first floor commercial and upper floor office or apartment uses.

o Ensure rehabilitation efforts incorporate design requirements for rehabilitation of existing or infill development for ground floor spaces that are appropriate for retail tenants, even if retail tenants do not occupy them. Architectural features, access and window configuration should be such to support retail space.

o Support the development of second and third story office or residential uses. �Façade Improvement Program Continue a Façade Improvement Program designed to promote the continued use and maintenance of commercial buildings in the South Side Business District by helping property owners and tenants rehabilitate and restore eligible structures. Support implementation of this program by:

Allocating dedicated grants for a Façade Improvement Program for historic renovations. Enhancing and promoting the City’s Façade Improvement Program. Establishing eligibility criteria for façade improvements (exterior improvements) such as:

o Exit doors; o Painting; o Shutters and awnings; o Signs; o Stairs, porches, railings and exits; and o Walls, windows and cornices.

�Business Retention and Expansion Offer a program for business retention and expansion to support businesses to become or remain profitable within the South Side Business District. A program of this type will be designed to help existing businesses survive and grow. This strategy includes the following components:

Continue to build a detailed market analysis using the results of this study as the basis for further development of current information useful in business retention such as:

Section 4

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 51

o Characteristics of the business district; o Description of the Trade Area; o Characteristics of existing and potential customers; and o Trends and future opportunities.

Conduct a detailed business survey. Continue to identify key businesses creating business clusters and niches.

�Niche Retail Opportunities

In the South Side Business District, niches already exist, but simply need to be organized. Strategies to grow these niches to become more visible can be achieved through store expansion, recruitment of new businesses and cooperative advertising and promotion (i.e. branding). The following describes the strategy for strengthening the existing niche markets:

Build upon the Farmers’ Market by creating a Festive Marketplace consisting of restaurants and specialty shops along with several stores offering convenience items to local residents. Build upon existing niches targeting the following opportunities.

Restaurant Niche Opportunities The following are opportunities for consideration that build upon an existing cluster of restaurant uses:

o Expand dining opportunities by offering a mix of dining opportunities from take-out, casual to fine dining (breakfast, lunch and evening dining opportunities);

Full-Service Restaurants; Special Food Services; Limited-Service Eating Places; and

o Specialty food stores combined with dining opportunities.

Restaurants should be encouraged to use outdoor areas where possible. The sidewalk and plaza area in front of the restaurants can serve this purpose. Adding a few tables with colorful umbrellas can add greatly to the visual quality of the street. Besides enhancing the vitality of the street scene, outdoor areas increase restaurant capacity with minimal increase in fixed costs. With the addition of heating elements, these tables can be used into the colder months (Fall and Spring) of the year.

Residents of the downtown area are an important market segment for existing and future dining operations in the downtown. This opportunity can be strengthened by daytime workers and tourists. The National Restaurant Association has identified four major groups of frequent diners.

o Busy parents of children often involved in after-school activities and sports typically use

drive-thru and carry-out restaurants. o Older adults and empty nesters typically eat on-premises at inexpensive sit-down

restaurants, buffets and fast food eateries. o People who are convenience driven and dislike cooking (with no young children)

typically use a variety of carry-out sources including restaurants and grocery stores. o Young, urban professionals with no children dine at higher priced establishments.

Section 4

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 52

TABLE 4.4: Population Characteristics Supporting Restaurant Dining

Factor Threshold Target Market Characteristics

Oil City Study Area

Oil City with 2-mile radius

Oil City with 8-mile radius

Household Income

Annual Income: $50,000 – 74,999 Spends $500 to $1,396 per capita on food away from home

15.1% 15.9% 16.5%

Annual Income: $75,000- $99,999 Spends $1,396 per capita on food away from home

3.3% 4.3% 5.7%

Age Householder age 45-55 spend more per capita on food away from home

13.7% 13.2% 13.8%

Household Size One and two person households spend more per capita on food away from home

62.6% 63.5% 63.2%

Household Composition

Husband and wife composition spend more per capita on food away from home

46.2% 48.6% 53.1%

Occupation Managerial and professional occupations spend the most per capita on food away from home

49.0% 19.2% 17.0%

Source: Claritas MarketPlace – 2010 The Nielsen Company. Specialty Niche Opportunities The following are a list of potential specialty niche opportunities that tend to cluster in smaller urban areas:

o Camera and Photographic Equipment Store; o Luggage and Leather Goods; o Hobby, Toy and Game Store; o Book Store and Newsstand; o Gift, Stationery, Office Supply and Novelty Store; o Sporting Goods; and o Music and Musical Instrument Store.

�Festive Marketplace with Connection to the Waterfront

The festive marketplace strategy is used to reverse the negative trends by attracting local residents, suburban residents and out-of-town visitors to downtown areas. A typical festive marketplace includes local involvement in the creation of a safe and trendy attraction intended to serve as a major catalyst for other redevelopment. Generally, a festive marketplace offers major restaurants, specialty retail shops, and a cluster of international foods. The more successful projects seem to benefit from waterfront locations and secure parking. The festive marketplace attracts the recreational shopper/tourist shopper but is also likely to attract the convenience shopper as more residential development on upper floors takes place. The area is likely to continue attracting area residents for dining and entertainment. An opportunity for further exploration is expansion of the existing seasonal farmers market with connection along First Street to designated space along the waterfront for additional vendors with opportunities for shopping and dining as local residents and visitors travel on foot or bicycle along First Street from Central Avenue (location of traditional farmer’s market) to the waterfront (new

Section 4

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 53

location for additional vendors). This opportunity may not succeed, however, without additional parking opportunities in this area.

Adequate Parking Supply Maintain sufficient parking on-site, on-street and in shared parking lots throughout the South Side Business District. Ensure sufficient time restrictions are placed based upon location of high demand and higher frequency of use. Develop a Parking Management Strategy as revitalization efforts warrant. �Strengthen Residential Neighborhoods Strengthen residential neighborhoods through rehabilitation, renovation and property maintenance with an increase in property values. Provide for appropriate pedestrian and bicycle safety measures to allow for these modes of travel to and from neighborhoods to the South Side Business District. Provide for sufficient densities to support commercial revitalization efforts. �Land Use Regulation and Building Codes Review and update land use regulations and building codes to address the following while maintaining consistency with the recently revised Multi-Municipal Regional Plan:

Consider Form-based Zoning for the South Side Business District with emphasis on design of public and private space with emphasis on vertical mixed use where retail or commercial are on the ground floor and residential or commercial are on upper floors. Strengthen the property maintenance code. Adopt a sign code conducive to urban environment with consideration of mass, scale, location and materials.

�Regional Tourism and Marketing Strategy

Establish connections between North Side Business District and South Side Business District through coordination and promotion of events, wayfinding signage, access to the waterfront, streetscape improvements, aesthetics and other means. Conduct joint business association meetings for the North Side Business District and the South Side Business District in order to cross market, establish a brand for Oil City and jointly promote shopping, dining, entertainment, recreation and tourism opportunities. Identify target markets.

Section 4.9 South Side Business District Revitalization Concepts

This section identifies revitalization concepts for the South Side Business District with emphasis on the core of the district. The following provides an understanding of existing conditions and potential revitalization concepts for the South Side Business District.

Section 4

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 54

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

West Front Street - North Side between Petroleum Street and Central Avenue

Cen

tral

Ave

nu

e

Petr

ole

um

Stre

et

Mul

tipl

e Fa

mily

Res

iden

tial

Spill

ing

th

e B

ean

sA

mer

ican

Hea

rt A

sso

ciat

ion

2-26

W F

ron

t St

14,7

58 s

q.ft

.

Cen

tral

Ave

nu

ePe

tro

leu

mSt

reet

Cen

tral

Ave

nu

e

West Front Street - South Side between Petroleum Street and Central Avenue

2 C

entr

al A

ve24

,042

sq

.ft.

Cen

tral

Ave

nu

ePe

tro

leu

mSt

reet

Oil

Cit

y Pu

blic

Lib

rary

7 Pe

tro

leu

m S

t22

,816

sq

.ft.

Inst

itut

iona

l

Cen

tral

Ave

nu

ePe

tro

leu

mSt

reet

YM

CA

East Front Street - North Side between Central Avenue and State Street

Dow

ntow

n Co

mm

erci

al

Stat

e St

reet

Fu

rnit

ure

14 E

Fro

nt

St10

,244

sq

.ft.

Cen

tral

Ave

nu

ePe

tro

leu

mSt

reet

Cen

tral

Ave

nu

e

East Front Street - South Side between Petroleum Street and Central Avenue

2 St

ate

St24

,363

sq

.ft.

Will

iam

s D

eco

rati

ng

9E F

ron

t St

5,13

4 sq

.ft.

Inst

itut

iona

l

Cen

tral

Ave

nu

ePe

tro

leu

mSt

reet

Cit

y O

pti

cal

Will

iam

s D

eco

rati

ng

BS

Bre

wb

ust

ers

Firs

t U

nit

edN

atio

nal

Ban

k

13 E

Fro

nt

St21

,526

sq

.ft.

1 C

entr

al A

ve2,

346

sq.ft

.

West First Street - North Side between Petroleum Street and Central Avenue

Cen

tral

Ave

nu

ePe

tro

leu

mSt

reet

Inst

itut

iona

l

Ch

rist

Epis

cop

alC

hu

rch

YM

CA

16 C

entr

al A

ve10

,352

sq.ft

.7

Petr

ole

um

St

22,8

16 s

q.ft

.

Cen

tral

Ave

nu

e

West First Street - South Side between Petroleum Street and Central Avenue

Dow

ntow

n Co

mm

erci

al

100

Cen

tral

Ave

22,2

40 s

q.ft

.

Cen

tral

Ave

nu

ePe

tro

leu

mSt

reet

Gra

ce U

nit

ed M

eth

od

ist

Ch

urc

h

15 W

Fir

st S

t7,

816

sq.ft

.

Inst

itut

iona

l

East First Street - North Side between Central Avenue and State Street

Stat

eSt

reet

Cen

tral

Ave

nu

e

Dow

ntow

n Co

mm

erci

al

Cit

izen

s B

ank

Ray

mo

nd

Jam

es

18 E

Fir

st S

t11

,589

sq

.ft.

24 E

Fir

st S

t3,

687s

q.ft

.

Frie

dh

aber

’s

Str

eets

cape

/ Fa

cade

Impr

ovem

ent

Conc

ept

2 E

Firs

t St

4,89

3 sq

.ft.

Fam

oo

r’sFr

ied

hab

er’s

Gat

es &

Bu

rns

Real

ty, I

nc.

Mov

ie S

top

6 E

Firs

t St

3,79

8 sq

.ft.

8 E

Firs

t St

3,79

8 sq

.ft.

12 E

Fir

st S

t4,

646

sq.ft

.14

E F

irst

St

4,48

2 sq

.ft.

Mov

ie S

top

East First Street - South Side between State Street and Central Avenue

Dow

ntow

n Co

mm

erci

al

19 E

Fir

st S

t19

,785

sq

.ft.

25 E

Fir

st S

t5,

943

sq.ft

.

Str

eets

cape

/ Fa

cade

Impr

ovem

ent

Conc

ept

9-15

E F

irst

St

9,50

2 sq

.ft.

Stat

eSt

reet

Cen

tral

Ave

nu

e

Ch

en’s

Gar

den

Firs

tN

atio

nal

Ban

k

Fran

klin

Oil

Reg

ion

Cre

dit

Un

ion

Clif

ford

’s C

arp

ets

1E F

irst

St

35,4

00 s

q.ft

.

Pro

fess

ion

alV

isio

n C

are

Lato

nia

Bar

ber

Sh

op

No

rth

wes

tSa

vin

gs

Ban

k

Bu

tler

’s C

and

ies/

Dee

Fo

ster

Mas

sag

e Th

erap

ist

Mas

on

icLa

ton

ia T

hea

tre

East First Street - North Side between State Street and Wilson Avenue

Wils

on

Ave

nu

eSt

ate

Stre

et

Dow

ntow

n Co

mm

erci

alIn

stit

utio

nal

114

E Fi

rst

St1,

138

sq.ft

.

Tob

ey’s

Pizz

aSt

. Ste

ph

en C

hu

rch

112

E Fi

rst

St11

,193

sq

.ft.

116

E Fi

rst

St3,

890

sq.ft

.11

8 E

Firs

t St

8,35

2 sq

.ft.

122

E Fi

rst

St5,

394

sq.ft

.

Emily

’sTr

easu

re Is

le

Str

eets

cape

/ Fa

cade

Impr

ovem

ent

Conc

ept

21 S

tate

St

7,53

1 sq

.ft.

East First Street - South Side between State Street and Wilson Avenue

Dow

ntow

n Co

mm

erci

alIn

stit

utio

nal

115

E Fi

rst

St7,

847

sq.ft

.11

9 E

Firs

t St

2,06

0 sq

.ft.

105

E Fi

rst

St3,

168

sq.ft

.

Wils

on

Ave

nu

eSt

ate

Stre

et

Nat

ion

wid

eIn

sura

nce

Edw

ard

Jo

nes

Inve

stm

ents

Sou

thSi

de

Au

to

Cal

vary

UM

C

Dow

ntow

n Co

mm

erci

al

101

Stat

e St

5,47

6 sq

.ft.

Central Avenue - West Side between Front Street and First Street

Inst

itut

iona

l

Ch

rist

Ep

isco

pal

Ch

urc

h

16 C

entr

al A

ve10

,352

sq

.ft.

Firs

tSt

reet

Fro

nt

Stre

etFi

rst

Stre

et

Ch

rist

Ep

isco

pal

Ch

urc

hO

il C

ity

Lib

rary

2 C

entr

al A

ve24

,042

sq

.ft.

Central Ave - East Side between Front Street and First Street

19 C

entr

al A

ve4,

893

sq.ft

.

Dow

ntow

n Co

mm

erci

al

Fro

nt

Stre

etFi

rst

Stre

et

Imag

ine

This

Ad

van

ced

Ch

iro

pra

ctic

Firs

t U

nit

edN

atio

nal

Ban

k

1 C

entr

al A

ve2,

346

sq.ft

.

Firs

tSt

reet

Rura

lM

enta

l Hea

lth

Ass

oci

ates Do

wnt

own

Com

mer

cial

17 C

entr

al A

ve2,

326

sq.ft

.

State Street - East Side between Front Street and First Street

21 S

tate

St

7,53

1 sq

.ft.

Fro

nt

Stre

etFi

rst

Stre

et

St. S

tep

hen

Ch

urc

hFi

rst

Stre

et

Inst

itut

iona

l

State Street - West Side between Front Street and First Street

Fro

nt

Stre

etFi

rst

Stre

et

Cit

izen

s B

ank

2 St

ate

St13

,020

sq

.ft.

Will

iam

s Tr

avel

Will

iam

sIn

sura

nce

& T

rave

l

Will

iam

s D

eco

rati

ng

Dow

ntow

n Co

mm

erci

alDo

wnt

own

Com

mer

cial

6 St

ate

St1,

760

sq.ft

.8

Stat

e St

3,53

4 sq

.ft.

24 S

tate

St

3,68

7 sq

.ft.

Section 5

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 69

Section 5.0 Action Plan Several improvements have been identified to address the overall project purpose of providing the City of Oil City with an approach to the development of transportation and land use improvements within the city’s south side area based upon PennDOT’s Smart Transportation initiative. These improvements focus on solutions that meet the goals defined by the City and project steering committee.

Section 5.1 Project Prioritization and Implementation

The various projects that contribute to fulfilling the vision for Smart Transportation solutions along the Route 62 Corridor and surrounding south side area have been analyzed in terms of cost, impact to the community, financing, necessary partnerships, and improvement to the local economy. Through this analysis the following project implementation and prioritization strategy has been developed.

High Level Priorities

o Central Avenue Streetscape Improvements � Central Avenue improvements would provide necessary infrastructure

improvements and an aesthetically pleasing upgrade to the pedestrian and roadway facilities between the limits of Front Street and Second Street. The improvements will accomplish these goals without impact to the existing cannon and monuments within the central island area.

o Central Avenue and First Street Signal Improvements

� Accessible (or Audible) Pedestrian Signal (APS) improvements at the intersection of Central Avenue and First Street will provide a safer crossing condition for the visually impaired pedestrian, as well as all pedestrians. The goal of an APS is to provide an audible notification of when it is safe to cross at an intersection. In addition, most modern devices are equipped with Braille to provide additional directions for operating the pedestrian push button.

o Second Street Streetscape Improvements

� Streetscape improvements along the Second Street Corridor, from Wilson Avenue to Front Street would provide functional and aesthetic improvements to the existing pedestrian facilities along this commercial/residential corridor. The improvements should be completed in coordination with access management improvements along the commercial side of the corridor, as well as infrastructure upgrades to the existing public water facilities.

o Front Street (Route 62) Corridor � A “road diet” project along the Route 62 Corridor will establish a transportation

facility that is consistent with existing and projected traffic volumes while promoting alternative modes of transportation through the inclusion of pedestrian facilities. This can be done in a phased approach, with the first phase establishing the new traffic patterns with turning lanes through the use of pavement markings only.

Section 5

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 70

o First Street Roundabout � A single-lane roundabout at the intersection of First Street / Wilson Avenue and

Front Street will provide a gateway into the business district of the south side of Oil City while calming traffic and improving the overall safety of motor vehicles and pedestrians.

o Land Use Initiatives � Incorporation of the various revitalization strategies identified in the previous

section with a focus of balancing the transportation and land use initiatives to enhance the downtown core of the south side business district.

Middle Level Priorities

o Downtown Core Streetscape � Streetscape improvements within the downtown core area will provide an

impact related to the Smart Transportation goals and objectives that were used as guidance through the development of the corridor study. The streetscape improvement would be focused on safety and aesthetic improvements to the pedestrian facilities. These improvements could be completed at once or packaged as smaller, more affordable projects.

o Railroad Wye Bridge � Currently, the railroad bridge is posted for no pedestrians, however, the bridge

is commonly used as an access means between the north side and south side of Oil City. Bridge safety improvements, as well as upgraded pedestrian and bicycle facilities would provide a safe and convenient access between the residential area on the north side and the commercial area on the south side. Implementation of these improvements will require coordination and buy-in from leaseholder Western New York and Pennsylvania Railroad.

o Rail Trail

� Open space along the southern banks of the Allegheny River provides a convenient opportunity for a hiker/biker trail within the study area. The proposed trail could stretch from the Veteran’s Memorial Bridge to the Wye Railroad Bridge and connect to future trail extensions. The goal of this improvement is to create a pedestrian facility that promotes pedestrian and bicycle use for recreational purposes, as well as transportation purposes. Implementation of these improvements will require coordination and buy-in from leaseholder Western New York and Pennsylvania Railroad.

o Public Plaza

� The proposed public plaza is located adjacent to the State Street and Front Street intersection. The goal of this improvement is to create a beautiful pedestrian gathering facility within the study area in a location that is close to the downtown core area of the south side, as well as access to the views and potential recreation opportunities along the Allegheny River.

Section 5

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 71

While the above solutions are categorized in “High Level” and “Mid-Level” priorities, the final implementation of these improvements will be finalized based upon available funding and partnership opportunities. It is recommended that the City of Oil City utilize the priorities to allow for a focused effort to obtain funding, but be willing to modify their course for the better good of the City. The following project sheets provide the base information pertaining to each of the proposed improvements, including the necessary information for the County’s Transportation Improvement Program (TIP).

Section 5

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 72

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

Project Description:

Central Avenue improvements would provide necessary infrastructure improvements and aesthetically pleasing upgrades to the pedestrian and roadway facilities. The improvements will accomplish these goals without impact to the existing cannon and monuments within the central island area. The planned improvement from Front Street to Second Street would include the following:

Concrete/concrete paver sidewalks Pedestrian lighting Benches, trash receptacles, bicycle racks Decorative median treatments Decorative crosswalks ADA curb ramps Street trees Water line replacement Roadway milling and overlay

Cen

tral A

venu

e S

treet

scap

e

Project Location

Project Characteristics

Priority Level High

Project Partners PennDOT, NWPRPDC, SS Business Association, SS Neighborhood Association, Oil Valley Chapter of the PA Council of the Blind, Property / Business Owners, Oil Region Alliance

Cost $1.4 to $1.5 Million

Funding Opportunities

PCTI Grant, CDBG EDA—Community Infrastructure ARRA Grant DCED—Community Revitalization Program DCED—Community & Municipal Facilities Assistance Program

Potential Improvements

Central Avenue 2nd

Stre

et

1st

Stre

et

Fron

t Stre

et

Central Avenue Streetscape

Existing Conditions

Project Description:

Accessible (or Audible) Pedestrian Signal (APS) improvements at the intersection of Central Avenue and First Street will provide a safer crossing condition for the visually impaired pedestrian. The goal of an APS is to provide an audible notification of when it is safe to cross at an intersection. In addition, most modern devices are equipped with Braille to provide additional directions for operating the pedestrian push button. To implement the APS improvements, several upgrades would be required to the existing signal, including:

New signal control cabinet Additional conduit and wiring Pushbuttons with integrated APS ADA curb ramps

Acc

essi

ble

Ped

estri

an S

igna

l

Project Location

Project Characteristics

Priority Level High

Project Partners PennDOT, NWPRPDC, SS Business Association, SS Neighbor-hood Association, Oil Valley Chapter of the PA Council of the Blind, Property / Business Owners

Cost $150,000 to $175,000

Funding Opportunities PCTI Grant, CDBG USDA—Community Facilities Loans and Grants PennDOT—Hometown Street, Safe Routes to School

Accessible Pedestrian Signalization

Existing Conditions

Project Description:

Streetscape improvements along the Second Street Corridor, from Wilson Avenue to Front Street would provide functional and aesthetic improvements to the existing pedestrian facilities along the commercial/residential corridor. The improvements would be completed in coordination with access management improvements along the commercial side of the corridor. Specific streetscape features would include:

Concrete sidewalks Pedestrian lighting ADA curb ramps Street trees Water line replacement Roadway milling and overlay Access management improvements

Sec

ond

Stre

et S

treet

scap

e

Project Location

Project Characteristics

Priority Level High

Project Partners PennDOT, NWPRPDC, SS Business Association, SS Neighborhood Association, Oil Valley Chapter of the PA Council of the Blind, Property / Business Owners, Oil Region Alliance

Cost $2.5 to $2.6 Million

Funding Opportunities PCTI, CDBG DCED—Community & Municipal Facilities Assistance Program DCED—Elm Street EDA—Community Infrastructure ARRA Grant

Current Conditions Potential Improvements

Second Street Streetscape

Existing Conditions

Project Characteristics

Priority Level High

Project Partners PennDOT, NWPRPDC, Venango County, SS Business Association, Property / Business Owners, Oil Region Alliance

Cost $3.25 to $3.5 Million

Funding Opportunities EDA—Public Works and Economic Development PennDOT—Pennsylvania Community Transportation Initiative/ Smart Transportation

Project Description:

The Front Street (Route 62) Corridor currently consists of a four-lane road from Pumphouse Road to Wilson Avenue. Front Street can be accessed from First Street/Wilson Avenue, Imperial Street, Second Street and Pumphouse Road. In addition, vehicles traveling east along Front Street have access to the CVS parking area via a right-in/right-out access point. The existing traffic volumes, which are consistent with future volumes, are low enough to allow for a potential “road diet” along the Front Street Corridor. In addition to a potential reduction of travel lanes, the Front Street Corridor could also be enhanced to provide for bicycle and pedestrian facilities, as well as additional traffic calming through the use of roundabouts at the First Street/Wilson Avenue and Second Street intersections. The term “road diet” is associated with the reduction of traveled lanes along a roadway while

Fron

t Stre

et (R

oute

62)

Cor

ridor

Project Location

still providing a facility that meets the current and future traffic demand. The proposed lane reduction would reduce the existing four-lane roadway (two lanes in each direction) to a three-lane roadway, which would include one lane per direction and a left turn lane/median area. The elimination of two thru lanes would allow for sufficient space for the median/left turn area, as well as designated pedestrian/bicycle facilities. The median area would provide an opportunity for a landscaped area to provide a more welcoming entrance to the City’s south side. The goal of the pedestrian/bicycle facilities would be to provide a sidewalk facility on the south side of Front Street and a shared-use facility on the north side. These improvements should also help to reduce the travel speeds along this section of Front Street.

Front Street (Route 62) Corridor

Existing Conditions

Alternate Roundabout

Project Description:

The existing intersection of Front Street/Wilson Avenue/First Street provides a unique opportunity for a gateway to the City of Oil City’s south side. This could be accomplished through the inclusion of a single lane roundabout at this location. In order for the roundabout to function as a single lane facility, it would need to be implemented following or along with the Front Street Corridor Improvements which reduce the typical roadway section from a 4-lane to a 3-lane section. A roundabout would not only provide the necessary gateway feature, but it would also provide an effective traffic control option, including reducing speeds as vehicles enter town. The proposed roundabout could be constructed to incorporate the existing fountain and associated landscaping into the center island area.

Firs

t Stre

et R

ound

abou

t

Project Location

Project Characteristics

Priority Level High

Project Partners PennDOT, NWPRPDC, Venango County, Business Associations, Property / Business Owners, Oil Region Alliance

Cost $550,000 to $600,000

Funding Opportunities EDA—Public Works and Economic Development PennDOT—PCTI/Smart Transportation FHWA—Capital Investments in Surface Transportation Infrastruc-ture

Current Conditions Potential Improvements

First Street Roundabout

Existing Conditions

Project Description:

Within the downtown core of the south side of Oil City, the focus of the streetscape improvements will be to bring together transportation improvements with land use, and coordinate pedestrian facilities within the business and commercial districts of the study area. Improvements in this area are to include full streetscape enhancements, including the following:

Concrete sidewalks Decorative brick pavers (buffer area) Pedestrian lighting Traffic signal improvements Amenities (Benches, Trash receptacles, Bicycle Racks) Decorative crosswalks ADA curb ramps Infrastructure Improvements (Water & Stormwater Improvements) Street trees Signage

These improvements could be completed at once or phased as funding becomes available.

Dow

ntow

n C

ore

Stre

etsc

ape

Project Location

Project Characteristics

Priority Level Middle

Project Partners PennDOT, NWPRPDC, SS Business Association, SS Neighborhood Association, Oil Valley Chapter of the PA Council of the Blind, Property / Business Owners, Oil Region Alliance

Cost $300,000 to $350,000 / Block Face (block sample First St from Central to State)

Funding Opportunities DCED—Community & Municipal Facilities Assistance Program DCED—Elm Street EDA—Community Infrastructure ARRA Grant

Current Conditions Potential Improvements

Downtown Core Streetscape

Current Conditions Potential Improvements

Existing Conditions

Rai

lroad

“Wye

” Brid

ge

Project Location

Project Characteristics

Priority Level Middle

Project Partners NWPRPDC, Venango County, Council on Greenways and Trails, Oil Region Alliance

Cost $350,000 to $375,000

Funding Opportunities FHWA—Capital Investments in Surface Transportation Infrastructure—ARRA

Project Description:

Pedestrian connections across the Allegheny River, connecting the south side to the north side include the State Street and Petroleum Street bridges. These two bridges are close to one another and provide a direct connection to the two downtown core areas of each of the north and south sides. There is also an existing Wye Railroad bridge which also crosses the Allegheny River east of the State Street Bridge, near the eastern limits of the study area. The bridge is currently posted for “no pedestrian” but it is commonly used by pedestrians. The bridge connects the Siverly residential neighborhood on the north side to the commercial, residential and other areas on the south side. The Wye Bridge contains an active rail line which services Continental Plastic Containers approximately three to four times per month. Improvements to the existing bridge would be a

strategic solution to provide pedestrian and bicycle use to connect the north and south sides of the river. Improvements to the bridge could include a new trail surface with a railing/fence to separate the trail from the active rail line, lighting, and repainting of the structure. Improvements to the bridge would include the following:

General bridge surface repairs Stone dust trail 4’ handrail separating the trail and rail 5’ wide pedestrian sidewalk Repainting of bridge structure

Such improvements would provide a safe and convenient access and could be tied into other improvements

Railroad Bridge

Existing Conditions

Potential Improvements

Existing Conditions

Rai

l Tra

il

Project Location

Project Characteristics

Priority Level Other

Project Partners NWPRPDC, Venango County, Council on Greenways & Trails, Oil Region Alliance

Cost $500,000 to $550,000

Funding Opportunities Bikes Belong Coalition—Bikes Belong Program EDA—Public Works & Economic Development Bikes Belong Coalition—REI/Bicycle Friendly Communities Grants

Project Description:

Open space along the southern banks of the Allegheny River provides a convenient opportunity for a hiker/biker trail within the study area. The proposed trail could stretch from the Veteran’s Memorial Bridge to the Wye Railroad Bridge and connect to future trail extensions. The goal of this improvement is to create a pedestrian facility that promotes pedestrian and bicycle use, serving recreational, as well as transportation, purposes. The proposed 10’ wide facility would consist of a handicapped accessible trail surface similar to the high standard surfaces used throughout the Oil Region system of trails. By introducing this improvement along with the Wye Bridge improvement, City residents could enjoy a healthier way of living through safe walking and biking, and also through a reduction in automobile use, noise, air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.

Rail Trail

Existing Conditions

Pub

lic P

laza

Project Location

Project Characteristics

Priority Level Other

Project Partners NWPRPDC, Venango County, Council on Greenways & Trail, Oil Region Alliance

Cost $950,000 to $1 Million

Funding Opportunities

EDA—Planning Program EDA—Community Infrastructure ARRA Grant DCED—Community & Municipal Facilities Assistance Program USDA—Community Facilities Loans and Grants

Project Description:

The proposed public plaza is located adjacent to the First Street and Front Street intersection. The goal of this improvement is to create a beautiful pedestrian gathering facility within the study area in a location that is positioned close to the downtown core area of the south side, as well as access to the views and potential recreation opportunities along the Allegheny River. The proposed plaza space could include an open space area that includes the existing pavilion. The open space area would provide a year-round passive space. The open space could also be used for special events, including the Oil Heritage Festival, fairs and other community events. Elements of the plaza space would need to include a retaining wall to increase the level area at the Front Street elevation. The level area could be constructed of concrete sidewalk, concrete paver

sidewalk, a combination of concrete and concrete paver sidewalk or another type of hard walkway surface. The plaza would provide a river overlook outlined by an appropriate height railing. Potential exists for the plaza area to include a seating area, possibly integrated with a series of retaining/seating walls, to provide bleacher type seating for viewing of kayaking or other events along the river. The plaza area would need to provide pedestrian access to other potential improvements within the area. This would include a pedestrian walkway to the downtown core via the Front Street and State Street intersection, a pedestrian walkway to the commercial area via the Front Street and First Street intersection and pedestrian access to a future trail along the Allegheny River via an ADA accessible ramp from the plaza area to the lower banks of the river. Other key elements of the public plaza would include appropriate scaled lighting to provide the necessary security and site furnishings including benches, trash receptacles and bicycle racks.

Public Plaza

Existing Conditions

Appendix A

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor Study Final Report October 2010

Appendix A: Community Participation Report

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | i

Table of Contents Appendix A: Community Participation .......................................................................................................... 1

Appendix A.1: Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1

Appendix A.1.1: Study Area / Vision Statement ................................................................................... 1

Appendix A.1.2: Steering Committee.................................................................................................... 2

Appendix A.1.3: Business Association ................................................................................................... 2

Appendix A.1.4: Public Meetings .......................................................................................................... 2

Appendix A.2: Committees ....................................................................................................................... 3

Appendix A.2.1: Steering Committee.................................................................................................... 3

Appendix A.2.2: Business Association ................................................................................................... 3

Appendix A.2.3: Public Meetings .......................................................................................................... 3

Appendix A.3: Scheduled Meetings .......................................................................................................... 4

Appendix A.3.1: February 1, 2010 Steering Committee ....................................................................... 4

Appendix A.3.2: February 1, 2010 Business Association ...................................................................... 8

Appendix A.3.3: April 21, 2010 City Council........................................................................................ 15

Appendix A.3.4: April 21, 2010 Steering Committee .......................................................................... 16

Appendix A.3.5: April 21, 2010 Public Meeting .................................................................................. 17

Appendix A.3.6: June 30, 2010 Steering Committee .......................................................................... 26

Appendix A.3.7: August 25, 2010 Steering Committee ...................................................................... 27

Appendix A.3.8: August 30, 2010 City Council .................................................................................... 28

Appendix A.3.9: September 2, 2010 Public Meeting .......................................................................... 29

Appendix A

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 1

Appendix A: Community Participation

Appendix A.1: Introduction

Appendix A.1.1: Study Area / Vision Statement

A Vision Statement describes desired future conditions for a community, neighborhood or transportation corridor such as the Route 62 Corridor. The following Draft Vision Statement for the Corridor was distributed for comment by the steering committee.

Draft Corridor Vision Statement (Original) Enhance the Route 62 Corridor in the city of Oil City to be a model of PennDOT’s Smart Transportation initiative by coordinating transportation improvements with land use, infrastructure and community development decisions. The developed implementation strategy will establish a safe, inviting and sustainable commercial area within the south side business district focused on improving vehicular and pedestrian safety. This desirable destination will provide an exceptional shopping and dining experience on the south side of Oil City as well as provide amenities that identify this area as an essential part of our community.

Appendix A

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 2

Draft Corridor Vision Statement (Revised) Enhance the Route 62 Corridor within Oil City to be a model of PennDOT's Smart Transportation initiative by coordinating transportation improvements with land use, infrastructure, economic development and community revitalization. Implementation strategies and community revitalization projects will strengthen a sense of place and establish safe, inviting, aesthetically pleasing and sustainable commercial and residential neighborhoods within the South Side Business District. Transportation improvements will address vehicular, transit, bicycle and pedestrian safety, accessibility and mobility. Improvements will enhance the Corridor and other streets to provide connections to and from residential and commercial neighborhoods and the waterfront for all modes of transportation. Transportation improvements will provide an opportunity for renewed development within and around the Corridor, continued community growth and a variety of amenities which establish this area as a unique place attracting residents, businesses and visitors.

Appendix A.1.2: Steering Committee

The steering committee was created to volunteer their time to assist, review and comment on the Corridor Study. The Committee met, on average, every two months throughout the planning process that extended from February 2010 through August 2010.

Appendix A.1.3: Business Association

The business association was created to gather input and insight on the Route 62 Corridor Study.

Appendix A.1.4: Public Meetings

Public meetings were held at various locations on the Southside of Oil City. These meetings were designed to inform the public on the study and to gather their input for future recommendations.

Appendix A

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 3

Appendix A.2: Committees

Appendix A.2.1: Steering Committee

Steering Committee Members met on the following dates: February 1, 2010 April 21, 2010 June 30, 2010 August 25, 2010

Appendix A.2.2: Business Association

Business Association Members met on the following sates: February 1, 2010

Appendix A.2.3: Public Meetings

Public Meetings were held on the following dates: April 21, 2010 September 2, 2010

Appendix A

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 4

Appendix A.3: Scheduled Meetings

Appendix A.3.1: February 1, 2010 Steering Committee

The first Steering Committee Meeting was held on February 1, 2010.

Appendix A.3.1.1: Agenda

Appendix A

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 5

Appendix A.3.1.1: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities & Threats (SWOT) The following is a summary of the top strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities and threats identified and prioritized by the meeting attendees. The purpose of the SWOT activity is to provide an opportunity for local residents, businesses, and organizations to identify the community’s assets and opportunities as well as weakness and threats. Participants were asked to react to the following questions to identify community strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats.

STRENGTHS (S) – List the physical, social and regulatory assets of the community.

What makes this community unique? What do I like about this community? What is contributing to a positive community image?

WEAKNESSES (W) – List the physical, social or regulatory obstacles or shortcomings of the community.

What do I dislike about this community? What would I like to see less of in this community? What is contributing to a poor community image?

OPPORTUNITIES (O) – List the physical and social entities or assets of the community that are underutilized or undeveloped.

Where are opportunities for new development and/or preservation? Where are opportunities for change? What would I like to see more of in this community? What could change the image of this community?

THREATS (T) – List the physical and social entities or assets and regulations that detract from the community or if left unchecked could diminish quality of life for residents and businesses in the community.

What prevents this community from flourishing? What are obstacles to community development and/or preservation? What detracts from a positive community image?

Upon completion of identification of issues or review of identified issues, participants were given an opportunity to identify the level of importance for various items listed.

Appendix A

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 6

Participants ranked their community assets, opportunities, weaknesses and threats by using a priority scale. High Priority = 5 High to Medium Priority = 4 Medium Priority = 3 Medium to Low Priority = 2 Low Priority = 1 The average was calculated for each strength, weaknesses, opportunity and threat using this scale. The following provides a summary listing of the issues and concerns identified through the SWOT activity conducted with the Steering Committee’s input from the meetings held on February 1, 2010.

Appendix A

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 7

Appendix A

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 8

Appendix A.3.2: February 1, 2010 Business Association

The first Business Association Meeting was held on February 1, 2010.

Appendix A.3.2.1: Agenda

Appendix A

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 9

Appendix A.3.2.2: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities & Threats (SWOT) The following is a summary of the top strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities and threats identified and prioritized by the meeting attendees. The purpose of the SWOT activity is to provide an opportunity for local residents, businesses, and organizations to identify the community’s assets and opportunities as well as weakness and threats. Participants were asked to react to the following questions to identify community strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats.

STRENGTHS (S) – List the physical, social and regulatory assets of the community. What makes this community unique? What do I like about this community? What is contributing to a positive community image?

WEAKNESSES (W) – List the physical, social or regulatory obstacles or shortcomings of the community.

What do I dislike about this community? What would I like to see less of in this community? What is contributing to a poor community image?

OPPORTUNITIES (O) – List the physical and social entities or assets of the community that are underutilized or undeveloped.

Where are opportunities for new development and/or preservation? Where are opportunities for change? What would I like to see more of in this community? What could change the image of this community?

THREATS (T) – List the physical and social entities or assets and regulations that detract from the community or if left unchecked could diminish quality of life for residents and businesses in the community.

What prevents this community from flourishing? What are obstacles to community development and/or preservation? What detracts from a positive community image?

Upon completion of identification of issues or review of identified issues, participants were given an opportunity to identify the level of importance for various items listed. Participants ranked their community assets, opportunities, weaknesses and threats by using a priority scale. High Priority = 5 High to Medium Priority = 4 Medium Priority = 3 Medium to Low Priority = 2 Low Priority = 1 The average was calculated for each strength, weaknesses, opportunity and threat using this scale. The following provides a summary listing of the issues and concerns identified through the SWOT activity conducted with the Business Association’s input from the meetings held on February 1, 2010.

Appendix A

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 10

Appendix A

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 11

Appendix A.3.2.3: Visual Preference Survey Summary of Visual Preference Survey A visual preference survey (VPS) is an innovative and successful technique that enables citizens to evaluate physical images of natural and built environments. The process involves asking participants to view and evaluate a wide variety of slides depicting streetscapes, land use, site design, building type, aesthetics and amenities. Individual scores indicate the level of preference for images viewed during the survey. The results are analyzed to determine what is appropriate for the Corridor. The visual preference survey was conducted during the Business Association Meeting on February 1, 2010. The following includes analysis methodology, presentation of results, a summary of preferences and the images used in the VPS. Methodology Individuals attending the meeting were asked to view numbered pictures which depicted various images of natural and built environments. Each participant was provided a sheet or a response card to record their response indicating appropriateness of the suitability of the development or setting for the Corridor. Individuals responded to twenty nine images. Response options included strongly oppose, oppose, no preference, some preference, and strong preference. Following the meeting, the survey sheets were collected and tallied. Each response option was assigned a weight factor, whereby the weights included: strongly oppose (-2), oppose (-1), no preference (0), some preference (1), and strong preference (2). The number of responses for each response option was summed and an average response value was calculated for each slide. Visual Preference Survey Results Overall, responses to the survey were favorable with some preference, or an average response value of 0.50. There were several images with strong preference, and several with strong opposition. The top preferred images included 10, 13, 15, 20, 21 and 25, with an average value of 1.53 (strong preference); while the top opposed images included 2, 12, 14, 22, 24 and 29, with an average value of -0.68. The following is a summary of images of the highest preferred and least preferred images.

Appendix A

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 12

Highest Preference Images These images suggest a higher importance should be placed on public space such as picnic areas, sidewalks, trails, paths and parks. Historical landmarks and signage were preferred images.

Average: 2.00 Average: 1.70

Average: 1.50 Average: 1.40

Average: 1.30 Average: 1.30

Appendix A

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 13

Lowest Preference Images These images suggest a higher importance should be placed on streetscape enhancements and signage.

Average: -0.90 Average: -0.90

Average: -0.80 Average: -0.60

Average: -0.50 Average: -0.40

Appendix A

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 14

Overall, the images provide a guide for the types of public spaces desired as well as types of uses and structures requiring rehabilitation or redevelopment, and desired or undesired design elements and aesthetics. The results of the survey are used to provide insight to design land use strategies and design standards for various locations throughout the Corridor.

Appendix A

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 15

Appendix A.3.3: April 21, 2010 City Council

The first City Council Meeting was held on February 1, 2010.

Appendix A.3.3.1: Agenda

Appendix A

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 16

Appendix A.3.4: April 21, 2010 Steering Committee

The second Steering Committee Meeting was held on April 21, 2010.

Appendix A.3.4.1: Agenda

Steering Committee Members in attendance were able to complete the activities in Section 3.4. Their results are included in Section 3.4.

Appendix A

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 17

Appendix A.3.5: April 21, 2010 Public Meeting

The first Public Meeting was held on April 21, 2010.

Appendix A.3.5.1: Agenda

Appendix A

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 18

Appendix A.3.5.2: Study Area / Vision Statement A Vision Statement describes desired future conditions for a community, neighborhood or transportation corridor such as Route 62 Corridor. Please review the Draft Vision Statement for the Corridor and provide and suggested changes. Draft Corridor Vision Statement (Revised) Enhance the Route 62 Corridor within Oil City to be a model of PennDOT's Smart Transportation initiative by coordinating transportation improvements with land use, infrastructure, economic development and community revitalization. Implementation strategies and community revitalization projects will strengthen a sense of place and establish safe, inviting, aesthetically pleasing and sustainable commercial and residential neighborhoods within the South Side Business District. Transportation improvements will address vehicular, transit, bicycle and pedestrian safety, accessibility and mobility. Improvements will enhance the Corridor and other streets to provide connections to and from residential and commercial neighborhoods and the waterfront for all modes of transportation. Transportation improvements will provide an opportunity for renewed development within and around the Corridor, continued community growth and a variety of amenities which establish this area as a unique place attracting residents, businesses and visitors. Comments provided by the public include:

Long I feel the Southside of Oil City to be the future heart of a new Venango City, because of Venango campus, stores, library and Y’s. Future Venango City should extend to Bredinsburg Road. Yes Sounds good Good vision Sounds good

Appendix A.3.5.3: SWOT Activity The Corridor possesses the following strengths:

Proximity of residential and commercial districts Diverse business mix with full capacity High volume of traffic to access commercial uses Scenic River Views Library, Churches, YMCA / YWCA and other attractions

The following is a summary of key corridor issues identified as weaknesses, opportunities and threats. The Key Corridor issues were ranked from 1 to 12, with 1 being the highest priority.

Appendix A

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 19

Appendix A.3.5.4: Build – A – Streetscape (Business District) Please select all components that you would like the study to consider for future streetscape improvements within the South Side Business District.

Comments provided by the public include: Landscape plantings for stormwater management and shading, etc. I would like the Southside (present) to become the new Venango City like it originally was back in the 1840’s and 1850’s before oil. If the speeders won’t slow down on Route 62 East I would like to see some speed bumps in place. No bumpouts. Try to work with Main Street Design Committee and Garden Club. Stormwater runoff should be assessed with a more environmental approach. Streetscape on the east end would enliven a utilitarian avenue.

Appendix A

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 20

Appendix A.3.5.5: Route 62 Boulevard Please identify all features the study should analyze as part of the alternatives considered for Route 62.

Comments provided by the public include:

Nice medians Maintenance and above. Do the bike and pedestrian trail. Without a proper riverfront any walkways would be underutilized.

Appendix A.3.5.6: Roundabouts Proper implementation of roundabouts can provide the following benefits:

Provide a means to calm traffic Can serve as a gateway feature Reduces frequency and severity of crashes When compared to a signal alternative, roundabouts can reduce traffic delays and increase traffic capacity

Please provide your opinion on consideration of a roundabout to be studied to address traffic safety and traffic speed issues.

Comments provided by the public include:

Too much for our little town. Concerns about east side pedestrian crossing. Wilson / Second is a wonderful intersection for pedestrians.

Appendix A

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 21

Appendix A.3.5.7: Visual Preference Survey Summary of Visual Preference Survey A visual preference survey (VPS) is an innovative and successful technique that enables citizens to evaluate physical images of natural and built environments. The process involves asking participants to view and evaluate a wide variety of slides depicting streetscapes, land use, site design, building type, aesthetics and amenities. Individual scores indicate the level of preference for images viewed during the survey. The results are analyzed to determine what is appropriate for the Corridor. The visual preference survey was conducted during the Public Meeting on April 21, 2010. The following includes analysis methodology, presentation of results, a summary of preferences and the images used in the VPS. Methodology Individuals attending the meeting were asked to view numbered pictures which depicted various images of natural and built environments. Each participant was provided a sheet or a response card to record their response indicating appropriateness of the suitability of the development or setting for the Corridor. Individuals responded to twenty nine images. Response options included strongly oppose, oppose, no preference, some preference, and strong preference. Following the meeting, the survey sheets were collected and tallied. Each response option was assigned a weight factor, whereby the weights included: strongly oppose (-2), oppose (-1), no preference (0), some preference (1), and strong preference (2). The number of responses for each response option was summed and an average response value was calculated for each slide. Visual Preference Survey Results Overall, responses to the survey were marginal with some preference, or an average response value of 0.18. There were several images with strong preference, and several with strong opposition. The top preferred images included 13, 10, 23, 5, 7 and 25, with an average value of 1.45 (strong preference); while the top opposed images included 2, 12, 14, 22, 24 and 29, with an average value of -1.05. The following is a summary of images of the highest preferred and least preferred images.

Appendix A

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 22

Highest Preference Images These images suggest a higher importance should be placed on public space such as picnic areas, sidewalks, trails, paths and parks. Historical landmarks and signage were preferred images.

Average: 1.85 Average: 1.70

Average: 1.45 Average: 1.37

Average: 1.15 Average: 1.15

Appendix A

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 23

Lowest Preference Images These images suggest a higher importance should be placed on streetscape enhancements and signage.

Average: -1.50 Average: -1.37

Average: -1.25 Average: -0.90

Average: -0.68 Average: -0.60

Appendix A

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 24

Overall, the images provide a guide for the types of public spaces desired as well as types of uses and structures requiring rehabilitation or redevelopment, and desired or undesired design elements and aesthetics. The results of the survey are used to provide insight to design land use strategies and design standards for various locations throughout the Corridor.

Appendix A

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 25

Appendix A.3.5.8: Miscellaneous Do you feel the railroad bridge should be studied for use by pedestrians? Comments provided by the public include:

Pedestrians and bicycles Yes, walking traffic from Siverly Yes Yes Yes Yes It gets used study or not Yes Yes Yes Yes, all stores and banks and most businesses frequented by Siverly residents are on the southside.

Do you have any concerns related to parking within the project study area? Comments provided by the public include:

Some parking needs to be eliminated or improved. No Always Yes Fear of loss by many businesses Yes Diagonal parking on Central Avenue. Yes Back out of diagonal spaces can be risky.

Other ideas / comments / concerns… Comments provided by the public include:

Consider bike lanes Concern for pedestrians crossing near roundabouts. Turn on red at all traffic lights. Sidewalk rehabilitation for the east end. Most ranked poorly. More bus stops, too few and far between.

Appendix A

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 26

Appendix A.3.6: June 30, 2010 Steering Committee

The third Steering Committee Meeting was held on June 30, 2010.

Appendix A.3.6.1 Agenda

Appendix A

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 27

Appendix A.3.7: August 25, 2010 Steering Committee

The fourth Steering Committee Meeting was held on August 25, 2010.

Appendix A.3.7.1 Agenda

Appendix A

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 28

Appendix A.3.8: August 30, 2010 City Council

The second Steering City Council Meeting was held on August 30, 2010.

Appendix A.3.8.1 Agenda

Appendix A

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor StudyFinal Report October 2010

P a g e | 29

Appendix A.3.9: September 2, 2010 Public Meeting

The second Public Meeting was held on September 2, 2010.

Appendix A.3.9.1: Agenda

Appendix B

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor Study Final Report October 2010

Appendix B: Traffic Count Data

������������

���������� ��

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Int

erse

ctio

n 1

(Fro

nt-P

etro

leum

)S

ite C

ode

: 000

0000

1S

tart

Dat

e: 1

1/10

/200

9P

age

No

: 1

Gro

ups

Prin

ted-

Pas

s. V

eh. -

Tru

cks

- Bik

esP

etro

leum

St

Nor

thbo

und

Pet

role

um S

t Brid

geS

outh

boun

dFr

ont S

treet

Eas

tbou

ndFr

ont S

treet

Wes

tbou

ndS

tart

Tim

eLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Ped

sA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htP

eds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Ped

sA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htP

eds

App

. Tot

alIn

t. To

tal

07:0

0 A

M0

330

033

053

02

558

00

08

90

410

5014

607

:15

AM

033

00

330

670

067

90

00

96

049

055

164

07:3

0 A

M0

450

045

066

00

668

02

010

310

850

116

237

07:4

5 A

M0

520

153

084

00

847

06

013

520

511

104

254

Tota

l0

163

01

164

027

00

227

232

08

040

980

226

132

580

1

08:0

0 A

M0

470

047

054

00

5413

01

014

360

421

7919

408

:15

AM

042

01

430

720

072

50

22

926

050

076

200

08:3

0 A

M0

260

026

076

00

766

01

07

270

520

7918

808

:45

AM

030

00

300

740

074

20

00

223

048

071

177

Tota

l0

145

01

146

027

60

027

626

04

232

112

019

21

305

759

***

BR

EA

K *

**

04:0

0 P

M0

420

042

010

80

010

86

02

08

600

840

144

302

04:1

5 P

M0

400

040

010

40

010

48

02

010

450

580

103

257

04:3

0 P

M0

610

162

013

60

013

611

00

011

520

581

111

320

04:4

5 P

M0

510

152

013

70

213

97

02

09

430

732

118

318

Tota

l0

194

02

196

048

50

248

732

06

038

200

027

33

476

1197

05:0

0 P

M0

550

055

011

90

312

24

03

29

600

770

137

323

05:1

5 P

M0

350

136

011

00

011

010

02

012

410

640

105

263

05:3

0 P

M0

450

045

098

00

986

01

07

340

540

8823

805

:45

PM

024

00

240

830

083

100

62

1849

033

082

207

Tota

l0

159

01

160

041

00

341

330

012

446

184

022

80

412

1031

Gra

nd T

otal

066

10

566

60

1441

07

1448

120

030

615

659

40

919

515

1837

88A

pprc

h %

099

.20

0.8

099

.50

0.5

76.9

019

.23.

839

.10

60.5

0.3

Tota

l %0

17.4

00.

117

.60

380

0.2

38.2

3.2

00.

80.

24.

115

.70

24.3

0.1

40.1

Pas

s. V

eh.

065

10

565

60

1400

06

1406

118

030

515

358

90

897

514

9137

06%

Pas

s. V

eh.

098

.50

100

98.5

097

.20

85.7

97.1

98.3

010

083

.398

.199

.20

97.6

100

98.2

97.8

Truc

ks0

100

010

041

00

412

00

02

50

220

2780

% T

ruck

s0

1.5

00

1.5

02.

80

02.

81.

70

00

1.3

0.8

02.

40

1.8

2.1

Bik

es0

00

00

00

01

10

00

11

00

00

02

% B

ikes

00

00

00

00

14.3

0.1

00

016

.70.

60

00

00

0.1

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Int

erse

ctio

n 1

(Fro

nt-P

etro

leum

)S

ite C

ode

: 000

0000

1S

tart

Dat

e: 1

1/10

/200

9P

age

No

: 2

Pet

role

um S

tN

orth

boun

dP

etro

leum

St B

ridge

Sou

thbo

und

Fron

t Stre

etE

astb

ound

Fron

t Stre

etW

estb

ound

Sta

rt Ti

me

Left

Thru

Rig

htP

eds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Ped

sA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htP

eds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Ped

sA

pp. T

otal

Int.

Tota

l

Pea

k H

our A

naly

sis

From

07:

00 A

M to

11:

45 A

M -

Pea

k 1

of 1

Pea

k H

our f

or E

ntire

Inte

rsec

tion

Beg

ins

at 0

7:30

AM

07:3

0 A

M0

450

045

066

00

668

02

010

310

850

116

237

07:4

5 A

M0

520

153

084

00

847

06

013

520

511

104

254

08:0

0 A

M0

470

047

054

00

5413

01

014

360

421

7919

408

:15

AM

042

01

430

720

072

50

22

926

050

076

200

Tota

l Vol

ume

018

60

218

80

276

00

276

330

112

4614

50

228

237

588

5%

App

. Tot

al0

98.9

01.

10

100

00

71.7

023

.94.

338

.70

60.8

0.5

PH

F.0

00.8

94.0

00.5

00.8

87.0

00.8

21.0

00.0

00.8

21.6

35.0

00.4

58.2

50.8

21.6

97.0

00.6

71.5

00.8

08.8

71P

ass.

Veh

.0

181

02

183

026

30

026

332

011

144

141

022

22

365

855

% P

ass.

Veh

.0

97.3

010

097

.30

95.3

00

95.3

97.0

010

050

.095

.797

.20

97.4

100

97.3

96.6

Truc

ks0

50

05

013

00

131

00

01

40

60

1029

% T

ruck

s0

2.7

00

2.7

04.

70

04.

73.

00

00

2.2

2.8

02.

60

2.7

3.3

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

11

00

00

01

% B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00

050

.02.

20

00

00

0.1

Pea

k H

our A

naly

sis

From

12:

00 P

M to

05:

45 P

M -

Pea

k 1

of 1

Pea

k H

our f

or E

ntire

Inte

rsec

tion

Beg

ins

at 0

4:30

PM

04:3

0 P

M0

610

162

013

60

013

611

00

011

520

581

111

320

04:4

5 P

M0

510

152

013

70

213

97

02

09

430

732

118

318

05:0

0 P

M0

550

055

011

90

312

24

03

29

600

770

137

323

05:1

5 P

M0

350

136

011

00

011

010

02

012

410

640

105

263

Tota

l Vol

ume

020

20

320

50

502

05

507

320

72

4119

60

272

347

112

24%

App

. Tot

al0

98.5

01.

50

990

178

017

.14.

941

.60

57.7

0.6

PH

F.0

00.8

28.0

00.7

50.8

27.0

00.9

16.0

00.4

17.9

12.7

27.0

00.5

83.2

50.8

54.8

17.0

00.8

83.3

75.8

59.9

47P

ass.

Veh

.0

201

03

204

049

70

550

232

07

241

196

026

93

468

1215

% P

ass.

Veh

.0

99.5

010

099

.50

99.0

010

099

.010

00

100

100

100

100

098

.910

099

.499

.3Tr

ucks

01

00

10

50

05

00

00

00

03

03

9%

Tru

cks

00.

50

00.

50

1.0

00

1.0

00

00

00

01.

10

0.6

0.7

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

% B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Int

erse

ctio

n 2

(Fro

nt-C

entra

l)S

ite C

ode

: 000

0000

2S

tart

Dat

e: 1

1/5/

2009

Pag

e N

o: 1

Gro

ups P

rinte

d- P

ass.

Veh

. - T

ruck

s - B

ikes

Cen

tral

Nor

thbo

und

Cen

tral

Sout

hbou

ndFr

ont

East

boun

dFr

ont

Wes

tbou

ndSt

art T

ime

Left

Thru

Rig

htPe

dsA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htPe

dsA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htPe

dsA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htPe

dsA

pp. T

otal

Int.

Tota

l07

:00

AM

170

00

170

00

11

00

01

16

530

059

7807

:15

AM

190

00

190

00

00

00

00

016

440

060

7907

:30

AM

190

01

200

00

00

00

01

18

103

00

111

132

07:4

5 A

M11

00

011

00

00

00

00

00

1996

00

115

126

Tota

l66

00

167

00

01

10

00

22

4929

60

034

541

5

08:0

0 A

M10

00

010

00

00

00

00

00

1869

00

8797

08:1

5 A

M12

00

012

00

00

00

00

00

2058

00

7890

08:3

0 A

M17

00

017

00

00

00

00

00

969

00

7895

***

BR

EAK

***

Tota

l39

00

039

00

00

00

00

00

4719

60

024

328

2

***

BR

EAK

***

04:0

0 PM

260

00

260

00

00

00

00

052

103

00

155

181

04:1

5 PM

190

00

190

00

22

00

00

037

100

00

137

158

04:3

0 PM

180

00

180

00

11

00

01

144

102

00

146

166

04:4

5 PM

190

01

200

00

11

00

02

234

930

012

715

0To

tal

820

01

830

00

44

00

03

316

739

80

056

565

5

05:0

0 PM

150

01

160

00

00

00

01

129

100

00

129

146

05:1

5 PM

150

00

150

00

11

00

02

234

880

012

214

005

:30

PM18

00

018

00

00

00

00

11

2172

00

9311

205

:45

PM19

00

019

00

03

30

00

22

1554

00

6993

Tota

l67

00

168

00

04

40

00

66

9931

40

041

349

1

Gra

nd T

otal

254

00

325

70

00

99

00

011

1136

212

040

015

6618

43A

pprc

h %

98.8

00

1.2

00

010

00

00

100

23.1

76.9

00

Tota

l %13

.80

00.

213

.90

00

0.5

0.5

00

00.

60.

619

.665

.30

085

Pass

. Veh

.25

30

03

256

00

09

90

00

1111

359

1168

00

1527

1803

% P

ass.

Veh

.99

.60

010

099

.60

00

100

100

00

010

010

099

.297

00

97.5

97.8

Truc

ks1

00

01

00

00

00

00

00

336

00

3940

% T

ruck

s0.

40

00

0.4

00

00

00

00

00

0.8

30

02.

52.

2B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0%

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Int

erse

ctio

n 2

(Fro

nt-C

entra

l)S

ite C

ode

: 000

0000

2S

tart

Dat

e: 1

1/5/

2009

Pag

e N

o: 2

Cen

tral

Nor

thbo

und

Cen

tral

Sout

hbou

ndFr

ont

East

boun

dFr

ont

Wes

tbou

nd

Star

t Tim

eLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alIn

t. To

tal

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fro

m 0

7:00

AM

to 1

1:45

AM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n B

egin

s at 0

7:30

AM

07:3

0 A

M19

00

120

00

00

00

00

11

810

30

011

113

207

:45

AM

110

00

110

00

00

00

00

019

960

011

512

608

:00

AM

100

00

100

00

00

00

00

018

690

087

9708

:15

AM

120

00

120

00

00

00

00

020

580

078

90To

tal V

olum

e52

00

153

00

00

00

00

11

6532

60

039

144

5%

App

. Tot

al98

.10

01.

90

00

00

00

100

16.6

83.4

00

PHF

.684

.000

.000

.250

.663

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.250

.250

.813

.791

.000

.000

.850

.843

Pass

. Veh

.52

00

153

00

00

00

00

11

6231

50

037

743

1%

Pas

s. V

eh.

100

00

100

100

00

00

00

00

100

100

95.4

96.6

00

96.4

96.9

Truc

ks0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

311

00

1414

% T

ruck

s0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

4.6

3.4

00

3.6

3.1

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

% B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fro

m 1

2:00

PM

to 0

5:45

PM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n B

egin

s at 0

4:00

PM

04:0

0 PM

260

00

260

00

00

00

00

052

103

00

155

181

04:1

5 PM

190

00

190

00

22

00

00

037

100

00

137

158

04:3

0 PM

180

00

180

00

11

00

01

144

102

00

146

166

04:4

5 PM

190

01

200

00

11

00

02

234

930

012

715

0To

tal V

olum

e82

00

183

00

04

40

00

33

167

398

00

565

655

% A

pp. T

otal

98.8

00

1.2

00

010

00

00

100

29.6

70.4

00

PHF

.788

.000

.000

.250

.798

.000

.000

.000

.500

.500

.000

.000

.000

.375

.375

.803

.966

.000

.000

.911

.905

Pass

. Veh

.82

00

183

00

04

40

00

33

167

388

00

555

645

% P

ass.

Veh

.10

00

010

010

00

00

100

100

00

010

010

010

097

.50

098

.298

.5Tr

ucks

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

100

010

10%

Tru

cks

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

2.5

00

1.8

1.5

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

% B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Int

erse

ctio

n 3

(Fro

nt-S

tate

)S

ite C

ode

: 000

0000

3S

tart

Dat

e: 1

1/11

/200

9P

age

No

: 1

Gro

ups P

rinte

d- P

ass V

eh. -

Tru

cks -

Bik

esSt

ate

Nor

thbo

und

Stat

eSo

uthb

ound

Fron

tEa

stbo

und

Fron

tW

estb

ound

Star

t Tim

eLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alIn

t. To

tal

07:0

0 A

M0

260

127

037

100

470

00

00

131

472

8115

507

:15

AM

040

00

400

6321

084

00

00

02

4152

095

219

07:3

0 A

M0

230

023

089

380

127

00

01

12

6347

111

326

407

:45

AM

030

00

300

5744

010

10

00

00

060

620

122

253

Tota

l0

119

01

120

024

611

30

359

00

01

15

195

208

341

189

1

08:0

0 A

M0

430

043

062

481

111

00

01

12

5166

212

127

608

:15

AM

027

00

270

8133

011

40

00

00

241

580

101

242

08:3

0 A

M0

340

135

086

230

109

00

01

10

4851

110

024

508

:45

AM

029

03

320

6928

097

00

00

02

6071

413

726

6To

tal

013

30

413

70

298

132

143

10

00

22

620

024

67

459

1029

***

BR

EAK

***

04:0

0 PM

030

02

320

102

480

150

00

03

33

6710

52

177

362

04:1

5 PM

029

01

300

105

450

150

00

00

04

7910

53

191

371

04:3

0 PM

035

00

350

9855

015

30

00

22

757

111

518

037

004

:45

PM0

380

038

010

463

016

70

00

22

462

101

517

237

9To

tal

013

20

313

50

409

211

062

00

00

77

1826

542

215

720

1482

05:0

0 PM

036

01

370

108

610

169

00

05

54

7111

38

196

407

05:1

5 PM

039

00

390

7752

113

00

00

33

565

115

418

936

105

:30

PM0

320

032

090

400

130

00

01

17

5195

315

631

905

:45

PM0

330

033

089

580

147

00

05

55

6472

814

933

4To

tal

014

00

114

10

364

211

157

60

00

1414

2125

139

523

690

1421

Gra

nd T

otal

052

40

953

30

1317

667

219

860

00

2424

5091

112

7148

2280

4823

App

rch

%0

98.3

01.

70

66.3

33.6

0.1

00

010

02.

240

55.7

2.1

Tota

l %0

10.9

00.

211

.10

27.3

13.8

041

.20

00

0.5

0.5

118

.926

.41

47.3

Pass

Veh

.0

520

09

529

013

0466

22

1968

00

024

2450

884

1268

4822

5047

71%

Pas

s Veh

.0

99.2

010

099

.20

9999

.310

099

.10

00

100

100

100

9799

.810

098

.798

.9Tr

ucks

04

00

40

135

018

00

00

00

273

030

52%

Tru

cks

00.

80

00.

80

10.

70

0.9

00

00

00

30.

20

1.3

1.1

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

% B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Int

erse

ctio

n 3

(Fro

nt-S

tate

)S

ite C

ode

: 000

0000

3S

tart

Dat

e: 1

1/11

/200

9P

age

No

: 2

Stat

eN

orth

boun

dSt

ate

Sout

hbou

ndFr

ont

East

boun

dFr

ont

Wes

tbou

nd

Star

t Tim

eLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alIn

t. To

tal

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fro

m 0

7:00

AM

to 1

1:45

AM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n B

egin

s at 0

7:30

AM

07:3

0 A

M0

230

023

089

380

127

00

01

12

6347

111

326

407

:45

AM

030

00

300

5744

010

10

00

00

060

620

122

253

08:0

0 A

M0

430

043

062

481

111

00

01

12

5166

212

127

608

:15

AM

027

00

270

8133

011

40

00

00

241

580

101

242

Tota

l Vol

ume

012

30

012

30

289

163

145

30

00

22

621

523

33

457

1035

% A

pp. T

otal

010

00

00

63.8

360.

20

00

100

1.3

4751

0.7

PHF

.000

.715

.000

.000

.715

.000

.812

.849

.250

.892

.000

.000

.000

.500

.500

.750

.853

.883

.375

.936

.938

Pass

Veh

.0

123

00

123

028

015

91

440

00

02

26

202

233

344

410

09%

Pas

s Veh

.0

100

00

100

096

.997

.510

097

.10

00

100

100

100

94.0

100

100

97.2

97.5

Truc

ks0

00

00

09

40

130

00

00

013

00

1326

% T

ruck

s0

00

00

03.

12.

50

2.9

00

00

00

6.0

00

2.8

2.5

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

% B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fro

m 1

2:00

PM

to 0

5:45

PM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n B

egin

s at 0

4:15

PM

04:1

5 PM

029

01

300

105

450

150

00

00

04

7910

53

191

371

04:3

0 PM

035

00

350

9855

015

30

00

22

757

111

518

037

004

:45

PM0

380

038

010

463

016

70

00

22

462

101

517

237

905

:00

PM0

360

137

010

861

016

90

00

55

471

113

819

640

7To

tal V

olum

e0

138

02

140

041

522

40

639

00

09

919

269

430

2173

915

27%

App

. Tot

al0

98.6

01.

40

64.9

35.1

00

00

100

2.6

36.4

58.2

2.8

PHF

.000

.908

.000

.500

.921

.000

.961

.889

.000

.945

.000

.000

.000

.450

.450

.679

.851

.951

.656

.943

.938

Pass

Veh

.0

137

02

139

041

422

40

638

00

09

919

265

429

2173

415

20%

Pas

s Veh

.0

99.3

010

099

.30

99.8

100

099

.80

00

100

100

100

98.5

99.8

100

99.3

99.5

Truc

ks0

10

01

01

00

10

00

00

04

10

57

% T

ruck

s0

0.7

00

0.7

00.

20

00.

20

00

00

01.

50.

20

0.7

0.5

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

% B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Int

erse

ctio

n 4

(Fro

nt-W

ilson

)S

ite C

ode

: 000

0000

4S

tart

Dat

e: 1

1/17

/200

9P

age

No

: 1

Gro

ups P

rinte

d- P

ass V

eh. -

Tru

cks -

Bik

esW

ilson

Nor

thbo

und

Wils

onSo

uthb

ound

Fron

tEa

stbo

und

Fron

tW

estb

ound

Star

t Tim

eLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alIn

t. To

tal

07:0

0 A

M25

00

025

00

00

00

00

00

083

00

8310

807

:15

AM

260

00

260

00

00

00

00

00

860

086

112

07:3

0 A

M22

00

022

00

00

00

00

00

086

00

8610

807

:45

AM

340

01

350

00

00

00

00

00

136

00

136

171

Tota

l10

70

01

108

00

00

00

00

00

039

10

039

149

9

08:0

0 A

M45

00

045

00

00

00

00

00

010

70

010

715

208

:15

AM

360

00

360

00

00

00

00

00

690

069

105

08:3

0 A

M35

00

035

00

00

00

00

00

070

00

7010

5**

* B

REA

K *

**To

tal

116

00

011

60

00

00

00

00

00

246

00

246

362

***

BR

EAK

***

03:4

5 PM

640

10

650

00

00

00

00

00

129

00

129

194

Tota

l64

01

065

00

00

00

00

00

012

90

012

919

4

04:0

0 PM

850

00

850

00

00

00

00

00

110

00

110

195

04:1

5 PM

730

00

730

00

00

00

00

00

110

00

110

183

04:3

0 PM

630

00

630

00

00

00

00

00

114

00

114

177

04:4

5 PM

730

00

730

00

00

00

00

00

116

00

116

189

Tota

l29

40

00

294

00

00

00

00

00

045

00

045

074

4

05:0

0 PM

660

00

660

00

00

00

00

00

109

00

109

175

05:1

5 PM

580

01

590

00

00

00

00

00

122

00

122

181

05:3

0 PM

510

00

510

00

00

00

00

00

110

00

110

161

05:4

5 PM

510

00

510

00

44

00

00

00

860

086

141

Tota

l22

60

01

227

00

04

40

00

00

042

70

042

765

8

Gra

nd T

otal

807

01

281

00

00

44

00

00

00

1643

00

1643

2457

App

rch

%99

.60

0.1

0.2

00

010

00

00

00

100

00

Tota

l %32

.80

00.

133

00

00.

20.

20

00

00

066

.90

066

.9Pa

ss V

eh.

801

01

280

40

00

44

00

00

00

1604

00

1604

2412

% P

ass V

eh.

99.3

010

010

099

.30

00

100

100

00

00

00

97.6

00

97.6

98.2

Truc

ks6

00

06

00

00

00

00

00

039

00

3945

% T

ruck

s0.

70

00

0.7

00

00

00

00

00

02.

40

02.

41.

8B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0%

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Int

erse

ctio

n 4

(Fro

nt-W

ilson

)S

ite C

ode

: 000

0000

4S

tart

Dat

e: 1

1/17

/200

9P

age

No

: 2

Wils

onN

orth

boun

dW

ilson

Sout

hbou

ndFr

ont

East

boun

dFr

ont

Wes

tbou

nd

Star

t Tim

eLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alIn

t. To

tal

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fro

m 0

7:00

AM

to 1

1:45

AM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n B

egin

s at 0

7:15

AM

07:1

5 A

M26

00

026

00

00

00

00

00

086

00

8611

207

:30

AM

220

00

220

00

00

00

00

00

860

086

108

07:4

5 A

M34

00

135

00

00

00

00

00

013

60

013

617

108

:00

AM

450

00

450

00

00

00

00

00

107

00

107

152

Tota

l Vol

ume

127

00

112

80

00

00

00

00

00

415

00

415

543

% A

pp. T

otal

99.2

00

0.8

00

00

00

00

010

00

0PH

F.7

06.0

00.0

00.2

50.7

11.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.7

63.0

00.0

00.7

63.7

94Pa

ss V

eh.

122

00

112

30

00

00

00

00

00

406

00

406

529

% P

ass V

eh.

96.1

00

100

96.1

00

00

00

00

00

097

.80

097

.897

.4Tr

ucks

50

00

50

00

00

00

00

00

90

09

14%

Tru

cks

3.9

00

03.

90

00

00

00

00

00

2.2

00

2.2

2.6

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

% B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fro

m 1

2:00

PM

to 0

5:45

PM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n B

egin

s at 0

3:45

PM

03:4

5 PM

640

10

650

00

00

00

00

00

129

00

129

194

04:0

0 PM

850

00

850

00

00

00

00

00

110

00

110

195

04:1

5 PM

730

00

730

00

00

00

00

00

110

00

110

183

04:3

0 PM

630

00

630

00

00

00

00

00

114

00

114

177

Tota

l Vol

ume

285

01

028

60

00

00

00

00

00

463

00

463

749

% A

pp. T

otal

99.7

00.

30

00

00

00

00

010

00

0PH

F.8

38.0

00.2

50.0

00.8

41.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.8

97.0

00.0

00.8

97.9

60Pa

ss V

eh.

284

01

028

50

00

00

00

00

00

452

00

452

737

% P

ass V

eh.

99.6

010

00

99.7

00

00

00

00

00

097

.60

097

.698

.4Tr

ucks

10

00

10

00

00

00

00

00

110

011

12%

Tru

cks

0.4

00

00.

30

00

00

00

00

00

2.4

00

2.4

1.6

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

% B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Int

erse

ctio

n 5

(Firs

t-Pet

role

um)

Site

Cod

e: 0

0000

005

Sta

rt D

ate

: 11/

10/2

009

Pag

e N

o: 1

Gro

ups

Prin

ted-

Pas

s V

eh. -

Tru

cks

- Bik

esP

etro

leum

Nor

thbo

und

Pet

role

umS

outh

boun

d1s

tE

astb

ound

1st

Wes

tbou

ndS

tart

Tim

eLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Ped

sA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htP

eds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Ped

sA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htP

eds

App

. Tot

alIn

t. To

tal

07:0

0 A

M1

31

05

375

210

6329

250

054

00

00

012

207

:15

AM

15

10

729

633

068

2942

20

730

00

00

148

07:3

0 A

M1

50

06

346

641

105

3927

00

660

00

11

178

07:4

5 A

M3

31

07

4214

842

142

4632

20

800

00

00

229

Tota

l6

163

025

142

3120

23

378

143

126

40

273

00

01

167

7

08:0

0 A

M3

110

014

298

560

9337

523

092

00

02

220

108

:15

AM

05

01

636

653

297

3742

10

800

00

00

183

08:3

0 A

M1

40

05

437

541

105

2032

00

520

00

11

163

08:4

5 A

M0

41

16

457

421

9526

370

265

00

00

016

6To

tal

424

12

3115

328

205

439

012

016

34

228

90

00

33

713

***

BR

EA

K *

**

04:0

0 P

M3

30

06

799

812

171

3752

00

890

00

00

266

04:1

5 P

M4

63

013

6012

774

153

3329

00

620

00

11

229

04:3

0 P

M2

101

114

8117

929

199

5340

10

940

00

22

309

04:4

5 P

M2

123

017

8012

891

182

4127

00

680

00

22

269

Tota

l11

317

150

300

5033

916

705

164

148

10

313

00

05

510

73

05:0

0 P

M1

40

05

8112

873

183

5051

10

102

00

02

229

205

:15

PM

18

22

1376

1173

016

030

331

064

00

03

324

005

:30

PM

16

00

758

965

013

239

410

080

00

03

322

205

:45

PM

19

20

1265

866

314

221

401

062

00

02

221

8To

tal

427

42

3728

040

291

661

714

016

53

030

80

00

1010

972

Gra

nd T

otal

2598

155

143

875

149

1037

2920

9056

760

212

211

830

00

1919

3435

App

rch

%17

.568

.510

.53.

541

.97.

149

.61.

447

.950

.91

0.2

00

010

0To

tal %

0.7

2.9

0.4

0.1

4.2

25.5

4.3

30.2

0.8

60.8

16.5

17.5

0.3

0.1

34.4

00

00.

60.

6P

ass

Veh

.24

9815

514

285

414

810

2626

2054

557

597

122

1168

00

019

1933

83%

Pas

s V

eh.

9610

010

010

099

.397

.699

.398

.989

.798

.398

.299

.210

010

098

.70

00

100

100

98.5

Truc

ks1

00

01

211

111

3410

50

015

00

00

050

% T

ruck

s4

00

00.

72.

40.

71.

13.

41.

61.

80.

80

01.

30

00

00

1.5

Bik

es0

00

00

00

02

20

00

00

00

00

02

% B

ikes

00

00

00

00

6.9

0.1

00

00

00

00

00

0.1

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Int

erse

ctio

n 5

(Firs

t-Pet

role

um)

Site

Cod

e: 0

0000

005

Sta

rt D

ate

: 11/

10/2

009

Pag

e N

o: 2

Pet

role

umN

orth

boun

dP

etro

leum

Sou

thbo

und

1st

Eas

tbou

nd1s

tW

estb

ound

Sta

rt Ti

me

Left

Thru

Rig

htP

eds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Ped

sA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htP

eds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Ped

sA

pp. T

otal

Int.

Tota

l

Pea

k H

our A

naly

sis

From

07:

00 A

M to

11:

45 A

M -

Pea

k 1

of 1

Pea

k H

our f

or E

ntire

Inte

rsec

tion

Beg

ins

at 0

7:30

AM

07:3

0 A

M1

50

06

346

641

105

3927

00

660

00

11

178

07:4

5 A

M3

31

07

4214

842

142

4632

20

800

00

00

229

08:0

0 A

M3

110

014

298

560

9337

523

092

00

02

220

108

:15

AM

05

01

636

653

297

3742

10

800

00

00

183

Tota

l Vol

ume

724

11

3314

134

257

543

715

915

36

031

80

00

33

791

% A

pp. T

otal

21.2

72.7

33

32.3

7.8

58.8

1.1

5048

.11.

90

00

010

0P

HF

.583

.545

.250

.250

.589

.839

.607

.765

.625

.769

.864

.736

.500

.000

.864

.000

.000

.000

.375

.375

.864

Pas

s V

eh.

624

11

3214

033

254

343

015

715

26

031

50

00

33

780

% P

ass

Veh

.85

.710

010

010

097

.099

.397

.198

.860

.098

.498

.799

.310

00

99.1

00

010

010

098

.6Tr

ucks

10

00

11

13

16

21

00

30

00

00

10%

Tru

cks

14.3

00

03.

00.

72.

91.

220

.01.

41.

30.

70

00.

90

00

00

1.3

Bik

es0

00

00

00

01

10

00

00

00

00

01

% B

ikes

00

00

00

00

20.0

0.2

00

00

00

00

00

0.1

Pea

k H

our A

naly

sis

From

12:

00 P

M to

05:

45 P

M -

Pea

k 1

of 1

Pea

k H

our f

or E

ntire

Inte

rsec

tion

Beg

ins

at 0

4:30

PM

04:3

0 P

M2

101

114

8117

929

199

5340

10

940

00

22

309

04:4

5 P

M2

123

017

8012

891

182

4127

00

680

00

22

269

05:0

0 P

M1

40

05

8112

873

183

5051

10

102

00

02

229

205

:15

PM

18

22

1376

1173

016

030

331

064

00

03

324

0To

tal V

olum

e6

346

349

318

5234

113

724

174

151

30

328

00

09

911

10%

App

. Tot

al12

.269

.412

.26.

143

.97.

247

.11.

853

460.

90

00

010

0P

HF

.750

.708

.500

.375

.721

.981

.765

.927

.361

.910

.821

.740

.750

.000

.804

.000

.000

.000

.750

.750

.898

Pas

s V

eh.

634

63

4931

252

338

1371

517

215

13

032

60

00

99

1099

% P

ass

Veh

.10

010

010

010

010

098

.110

099

.110

098

.898

.910

010

00

99.4

00

010

010

099

.0Tr

ucks

00

00

06

03

09

20

00

20

00

00

11%

Tru

cks

00

00

01.

90

0.9

01.

21.

10

00

0.6

00

00

01.

0B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0%

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Int

erse

ctio

n 6

(Firs

t-Cen

tral)

Site

Cod

e: 0

0000

006

Sta

rt D

ate

: 11/

5/20

09P

age

No

: 1

Gro

ups P

rinte

d- P

ass V

eh. -

Tru

cks -

Bik

esC

entra

lN

orth

boun

dC

entra

lSo

uthb

ound

1st

East

boun

d1s

tW

estb

ound

Star

t Tim

eLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alIn

t. To

tal

07:0

0 A

M0

1814

032

24

00

60

490

150

00

00

088

07:1

5 A

M0

1618

034

211

00

133

533

059

00

00

010

607

:30

AM

014

180

323

60

09

663

11

710

00

00

112

07:4

5 A

M0

1423

138

216

00

181

584

063

00

00

011

9To

tal

062

731

136

937

00

4610

223

82

243

00

00

042

5

08:0

0 A

M0

1132

245

412

01

172

812

085

00

00

014

708

:15

AM

014

142

306

150

021

473

61

840

00

00

135

08:3

0 A

M0

1116

027

54

00

96

575

068

00

01

110

508

:45

AM

013

161

3010

100

121

156

72

660

00

11

118

Tota

l0

4978

513

225

410

268

1326

720

330

30

00

22

505

***

BR

EAK

***

04:0

0 PM

021

254

5017

360

154

673

81

880

00

11

193

04:1

5 PM

013

272

4212

280

242

772

133

950

00

33

182

04:3

0 PM

09

201

309

290

341

474

106

940

00

00

165

04:4

5 PM

012

231

3617

250

042

910

314

513

10

00

11

210

Tota

l0

5595

815

855

118

06

179

2632

245

1540

80

00

55

750

05:0

0 PM

010

182

3013

200

841

790

144

115

00

05

519

105

:15

PM0

1623

140

1123

03

374

105

212

132

00

02

221

105

:30

PM0

1019

332

914

03

266

976

211

10

00

33

172

05:4

5 PM

010

211

325

170

224

661

141

820

00

11

139

Tota

l0

4681

713

438

740

1612

823

353

559

440

00

011

1171

3

Gra

nd T

otal

021

232

721

560

127

270

024

421

7211

6512

829

1394

00

018

1823

93A

pprc

h %

037

.958

.43.

830

.264

.10

5.7

5.2

83.6

9.2

2.1

00

010

0To

tal %

08.

913

.70.

923

.45.

311

.30

117

.63

48.7

5.3

1.2

58.3

00

00.

80.

8Pa

ss V

eh.

020

932

221

552

125

266

024

415

7211

1112

629

1338

00

018

1823

23%

Pas

s Veh

.0

98.6

98.5

100

98.6

98.4

98.5

010

098

.610

095

.498

.410

096

00

010

010

097

.1Tr

ucks

03

50

82

40

06

054

20

560

00

00

70%

Tru

cks

01.

41.

50

1.4

1.6

1.5

00

1.4

04.

61.

60

40

00

00

2.9

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

% B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Int

erse

ctio

n 6

(Firs

t-Cen

tral)

Site

Cod

e: 0

0000

006

Sta

rt D

ate

: 11/

5/20

09P

age

No

: 2

Cen

tral

Nor

thbo

und

Cen

tral

Sout

hbou

nd1s

tEa

stbo

und

1st

Wes

tbou

nd

Star

t Tim

eLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alIn

t. To

tal

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fro

m 0

7:00

AM

to 1

1:45

AM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n B

egin

s at 0

7:30

AM

07:3

0 A

M0

1418

032

36

00

96

631

171

00

00

011

207

:45

AM

014

231

382

160

018

158

40

630

00

00

119

08:0

0 A

M0

1132

245

412

01

172

812

085

00

00

014

708

:15

AM

014

142

306

150

021

473

61

840

00

00

135

Tota

l Vol

ume

053

875

145

1549

01

6513

275

132

303

00

00

051

3%

App

. Tot

al0

36.6

603.

423

.175

.40

1.5

4.3

90.8

4.3

0.7

00

00

PHF

.000

.946

.680

.625

.806

.625

.766

.000

.250

.774

.542

.849

.542

.500

.891

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.872

Pass

Veh

.0

5385

514

314

460

161

1325

113

227

90

00

00

483

% P

ass V

eh.

010

097

.710

098

.693

.393

.90

100

93.8

100

91.3

100

100

92.1

00

00

094

.2Tr

ucks

00

20

21

30

04

024

00

240

00

00

30%

Tru

cks

00

2.3

01.

46.

76.

10

06.

20

8.7

00

7.9

00

00

05.

8B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0%

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fro

m 1

2:00

PM

to 0

5:45

PM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n B

egin

s at 0

4:45

PM

04:4

5 PM

012

231

3617

250

042

910

314

513

10

00

11

210

05:0

0 PM

010

182

3013

200

841

790

144

115

00

05

519

105

:15

PM0

1623

140

1123

03

374

105

212

132

00

02

221

105

:30

PM0

1019

332

914

03

266

976

211

10

00

33

172

Tota

l Vol

ume

048

837

138

5082

014

146

2639

555

1348

90

00

1111

784

% A

pp. T

otal

034

.860

.15.

134

.256

.20

9.6

5.3

80.8

11.2

2.7

00

010

0PH

F.0

00.7

50.9

02.5

83.8

63.7

35.8

20.0

00.4

38.8

69.7

22.9

40.6

55.6

50.9

26.0

00.0

00.0

00.5

50.5

50.9

29Pa

ss V

eh.

046

837

136

5081

014

145

2638

854

1348

10

00

1111

773

% P

ass V

eh.

095

.810

010

098

.610

098

.80

100

99.3

100

98.2

98.2

100

98.4

00

010

010

098

.6Tr

ucks

02

00

20

10

01

07

10

80

00

00

11%

Tru

cks

04.

20

01.

40

1.2

00

0.7

01.

81.

80

1.6

00

00

01.

4B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0%

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Int

erse

ctio

n 7

(Firs

t-Sta

te)

Site

Cod

e: 0

0000

007

Sta

rt D

ate

: 11/

11/2

009

Pag

e N

o: 1

Gro

ups P

rinte

d- P

ass V

eh. -

Tru

cks -

Bik

esSt

ate

Nor

thbo

und

Stat

eSo

uthb

ound

1st

East

boun

d1s

tW

estb

ound

Star

t Tim

eLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alIn

t. To

tal

07:0

0 A

M0

00

00

401

01

4226

351

062

00

00

010

407

:15

AM

00

00

065

20

067

3736

00

730

00

00

140

07:3

0 A

M0

00

00

865

01

9227

440

273

00

00

016

507

:45

AM

00

01

154

40

058

3256

11

900

00

00

149

Tota

l0

00

11

245

120

225

912

217

12

329

80

00

00

558

08:0

0 A

M0

00

11

562

01

5942

413

086

00

00

014

608

:15

AM

00

00

079

40

083

3056

10

870

00

00

170

08:3

0 A

M0

00

11

832

01

8635

502

087

00

01

117

508

:45

AM

00

00

066

40

171

3153

12

870

00

11

159

Tota

l0

00

22

284

120

329

913

820

07

234

70

00

22

650

***

BR

EAK

***

04:0

0 PM

00

02

290

80

199

3276

42

114

00

04

421

904

:15

PM0

00

22

100

90

010

931

795

111

60

00

22

229

04:3

0 PM

00

03

383

180

010

138

676

311

40

00

55

223

04:4

5 PM

00

01

196

100

310

939

846

513

40

00

11

245

Tota

l0

00

88

369

450

441

814

030

621

1147

80

00

1212

916

05:0

0 PM

00

00

010

47

01

112

3490

63

133

00

06

625

105

:15

PM0

00

44

746

00

8039

7410

212

50

00

33

212

05:3

0 PM

00

02

284

110

196

3362

42

101

00

02

220

105

:45

PM0

00

66

836

05

9435

505

393

00

01

119

4To

tal

00

012

1234

530

07

382

141

276

2510

452

00

012

1285

8

Gra

nd T

otal

00

023

2312

4399

016

1358

541

953

5526

1575

00

026

2629

82A

pprc

h %

00

010

091

.57.

30

1.2

34.3

60.5

3.5

1.7

00

010

0To

tal %

00

00.

80.

841

.73.

30

0.5

45.5

18.1

321.

80.

952

.80

00

0.9

0.9

Pass

Veh

.0

00

2121

1225

990

1613

4053

792

453

2515

390

00

2525

2925

% P

ass V

eh.

00

091

.391

.398

.610

00

100

98.7

99.3

9796

.496

.297

.70

00

96.2

96.2

98.1

Truc

ks0

00

00

180

00

184

292

035

00

00

053

% T

ruck

s0

00

00

1.4

00

01.

30.

73

3.6

02.

20

00

00

1.8

Bik

es0

00

22

00

00

00

00

11

00

01

14

% B

ikes

00

08.

78.

70

00

00

00

03.

80.

10

00

3.8

3.8

0.1

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Int

erse

ctio

n 7

(Firs

t-Sta

te)

Site

Cod

e: 0

0000

007

Sta

rt D

ate

: 11/

11/2

009

Pag

e N

o: 2

Stat

eN

orth

boun

dSt

ate

Sout

hbou

nd1s

tEa

stbo

und

1st

Wes

tbou

nd

Star

t Tim

eLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alIn

t. To

tal

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fro

m 0

7:00

AM

to 1

1:45

AM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n B

egin

s at 0

8:00

AM

08:0

0 A

M0

00

11

562

01

5942

413

086

00

00

014

608

:15

AM

00

00

079

40

083

3056

10

870

00

00

170

08:3

0 A

M0

00

11

832

01

8635

502

087

00

01

117

508

:45

AM

00

00

066

40

171

3153

12

870

00

11

159

Tota

l Vol

ume

00

02

228

412

03

299

138

200

72

347

00

02

265

0%

App

. Tot

al0

00

100

954

01

39.8

57.6

20.

60

00

100

PHF

.000

.000

.000

.500

.500

.855

.750

.000

.750

.869

.821

.893

.583

.250

.997

.000

.000

.000

.500

.500

.929

Pass

Veh

.0

00

22

271

120

328

613

819

36

233

90

00

22

629

% P

ass V

eh.

00

010

010

095

.410

00

100

95.7

100

96.5

85.7

100

97.7

00

010

010

096

.8Tr

ucks

00

00

013

00

013

07

10

80

00

00

21%

Tru

cks

00

00

04.

60

00

4.3

03.

514

.30

2.3

00

00

03.

2B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0%

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fro

m 1

2:00

PM

to 0

5:45

PM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n B

egin

s at 0

4:15

PM

04:1

5 PM

00

02

210

09

00

109

3179

51

116

00

02

222

904

:30

PM0

00

33

8318

00

101

3867

63

114

00

05

522

304

:45

PM0

00

11

9610

03

109

3984

65

134

00

01

124

505

:00

PM0

00

00

104

70

111

234

906

313

30

00

66

251

Tota

l Vol

ume

00

06

638

344

04

431

142

320

2312

497

00

014

1494

8%

App

. Tot

al0

00

100

88.9

10.2

00.

928

.664

.44.

62.

40

00

100

PHF

.000

.000

.000

.500

.500

.921

.611

.000

.333

.962

.910

.889

.958

.600

.927

.000

.000

.000

.583

.583

.944

Pass

Veh

.0

00

66

382

440

443

014

131

723

1249

30

00

1313

942

% P

ass V

eh.

00

010

010

099

.710

00

100

99.8

99.3

99.1

100

100

99.2

00

092

.992

.999

.4Tr

ucks

00

00

01

00

01

13

00

40

00

00

5%

Tru

cks

00

00

00.

30

00

0.2

0.7

0.9

00

0.8

00

00

00.

5B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

11

1%

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

07.

17.

10.

1

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Int

erse

ctio

n 8

(Firs

t-Wils

on)

Site

Cod

e: 0

0000

008

Sta

rt D

ate

: 11/

17/2

009

Pag

e N

o: 1

Gro

ups P

rinte

d- P

ass V

eh. -

Tru

cks -

Bik

esW

ilson

Nor

thbo

und

Wils

onSo

uthb

ound

1st

East

boun

d1s

tW

estb

ound

Star

t Tim

eLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alIn

t. To

tal

07:0

0 A

M0

270

027

00

00

03

5725

085

00

00

011

207

:15

AM

032

20

340

00

00

074

211

960

00

00

130

07:3

0 A

M0

210

122

00

00

01

7634

111

20

00

00

134

07:4

5 A

M0

351

036

00

00

04

9538

013

70

00

11

174

Tota

l0

115

31

119

00

00

08

302

118

243

00

00

11

550

08:0

0 A

M0

411

042

00

00

05

9341

013

90

00

00

181

08:1

5 A

M0

360

238

00

00

01

9739

113

80

00

00

176

08:3

0 A

M0

350

035

00

00

02

8932

012

30

00

00

158

08:4

5 A

M0

252

027

00

00

01

6535

010

10

00

00

128

Tota

l0

137

32

142

00

00

09

344

147

150

10

00

00

643

***

BR

EAK

***

04:0

0 PM

086

03

890

00

00

613

858

220

40

00

11

294

04:1

5 PM

068

10

690

00

00

610

770

118

40

00

00

253

04:3

0 PM

157

01

590

00

00

713

564

220

80

00

00

267

04:4

5 PM

066

10

670

00

00

910

873

019

00

00

33

260

Tota

l1

277

24

284

00

00

028

488

265

578

60

00

44

1074

05:0

0 PM

063

20

650

00

00

613

865

121

00

00

11

276

05:1

5 PM

059

00

590

00

00

210

744

015

30

00

00

212

05:3

0 PM

049

01

500

00

00

194

570

152

00

00

020

205

:45

PM0

520

052

00

00

04

102

473

156

00

05

521

3To

tal

022

32

122

60

00

00

1344

121

34

671

00

06

690

3

Gra

nd T

otal

175

210

877

10

00

00

5815

7574

312

2388

00

011

1131

70A

pprc

h %

0.1

97.5

1.3

10

00

02.

466

31.1

0.5

00

010

0To

tal %

023

.70.

30.

324

.30

00

00

1.8

49.7

23.4

0.4

75.3

00

00.

30.

3Pa

ss V

eh.

174

710

876

60

00

00

5815

3773

612

2343

00

011

1131

20%

Pas

s Veh

.10

099

.310

010

099

.40

00

00

100

97.6

99.1

100

98.1

00

010

010

098

.4Tr

ucks

05

00

50

00

00

038

70

450

00

00

50%

Tru

cks

00.

70

00.

60

00

00

02.

40.

90

1.9

00

00

01.

6B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0%

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Int

erse

ctio

n 8

(Firs

t-Wils

on)

Site

Cod

e: 0

0000

008

Sta

rt D

ate

: 11/

17/2

009

Pag

e N

o: 2

Wils

onN

orth

boun

dW

ilson

Sout

hbou

nd1s

tEa

stbo

und

1st

Wes

tbou

nd

Star

t Tim

eLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alIn

t. To

tal

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fro

m 0

7:00

AM

to 1

1:45

AM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n B

egin

s at 0

7:45

AM

07:4

5 A

M0

351

036

00

00

04

9538

013

70

00

11

174

08:0

0 A

M0

411

042

00

00

05

9341

013

90

00

00

181

08:1

5 A

M0

360

238

00

00

01

9739

113

80

00

00

176

08:3

0 A

M0

350

035

00

00

02

8932

012

30

00

00

158

Tota

l Vol

ume

014

72

215

10

00

00

1237

415

01

537

00

01

168

9%

App

. Tot

al0

97.4

1.3

1.3

00

00

2.2

69.6

27.9

0.2

00

010

0PH

F.0

00.8

96.5

00.2

50.8

99.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.6

00.9

64.9

15.2

50.9

66.0

00.0

00.0

00.2

50.2

50.9

52Pa

ss V

eh.

014

42

214

80

00

00

1235

914

71

519

00

01

166

8%

Pas

s Veh

.0

98.0

100

100

98.0

00

00

010

096

.098

.010

096

.60

00

100

100

97.0

Truc

ks0

30

03

00

00

00

153

018

00

00

021

% T

ruck

s0

2.0

00

2.0

00

00

00

4.0

2.0

03.

40

00

00

3.0

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

% B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fro

m 1

2:00

PM

to 0

5:45

PM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n B

egin

s at 0

4:00

PM

04:0

0 PM

086

03

890

00

00

613

858

220

40

00

11

294

04:1

5 PM

068

10

690

00

00

610

770

118

40

00

00

253

04:3

0 PM

157

01

590

00

00

713

564

220

80

00

00

267

04:4

5 PM

066

10

670

00

00

910

873

019

00

00

33

260

Tota

l Vol

ume

127

72

428

40

00

00

2848

826

55

786

00

04

410

74%

App

. Tot

al0.

497

.50.

71.

40

00

03.

662

.133

.70.

60

00

100

PHF

.250

.805

.500

.333

.798

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.778

.884

.908

.625

.945

.000

.000

.000

.333

.333

.913

Pass

Veh

.1

276

24

283

00

00

028

481

265

577

90

00

44

1066

% P

ass V

eh.

100

99.6

100

100

99.6

00

00

010

098

.610

010

099

.10

00

100

100

99.3

Truc

ks0

10

01

00

00

00

70

07

00

00

08

% T

ruck

s0

0.4

00

0.4

00

00

00

1.4

00

0.9

00

00

00.

7B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0%

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Int

erse

ctio

n 10

(SR

62-Im

peria

l)S

ite C

ode

: 000

0001

0S

tart

Dat

e: 1

1/4/

2009

Pag

e N

o: 1

Gro

ups P

rinte

d- P

ass V

eh. -

Tru

cks -

Bik

esR

T 62

Nor

thbo

und

RT

62So

uthb

ound

Impe

rial

East

boun

dIm

peria

lW

estb

ound

Star

t Tim

eLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alIn

t. To

tal

07:0

0 A

M0

730

073

057

10

584

00

04

00

00

013

507

:15

AM

073

00

730

672

069

50

10

60

00

00

148

07:3

0 A

M0

111

00

111

079

30

822

01

03

00

00

019

607

:45

AM

011

20

011

20

941

095

40

20

60

00

00

213

Tota

l0

369

00

369

029

77

030

415

04

019

00

00

069

2

08:0

0 A

M0

800

080

068

10

694

05

09

00

00

015

808

:15

AM

165

00

660

801

081

10

40

50

00

00

152

08:3

0 A

M1

730

074

065

10

661

02

03

00

00

014

308

:45

AM

184

00

850

563

059

20

30

50

00

00

149

Tota

l3

302

00

305

026

96

027

58

014

022

00

00

060

2

***

BR

EAK

***

04:0

0 PM

290

00

920

108

110

119

110

70

180

00

00

229

04:1

5 PM

211

00

011

20

100

40

104

80

100

180

00

00

234

04:3

0 PM

410

70

011

10

932

095

110

00

110

00

00

217

04:4

5 PM

382

00

850

106

30

109

50

30

80

00

00

202

Tota

l11

389

00

400

040

720

042

735

020

055

00

00

088

2

05:0

0 PM

011

30

011

30

115

30

118

120

70

190

00

00

250

05:1

5 PM

311

90

012

20

113

50

118

80

80

160

00

00

256

05:3

0 PM

390

00

930

640

064

50

30

80

00

00

165

05:4

5 PM

271

00

730

693

072

70

30

100

00

00

155

Tota

l8

393

00

401

036

111

037

232

021

053

00

00

082

6

Gra

nd T

otal

2214

530

014

750

1334

440

1378

900

590

149

00

00

030

02A

pprc

h %

1.5

98.5

00

096

.83.

20

60.4

039

.60

00

00

Tota

l %0.

748

.40

049

.10

44.4

1.5

045

.93

02

05

00

00

0Pa

ss V

eh.

2214

050

014

270

1288

430

1331

890

590

148

00

00

029

06%

Pas

s Veh

.10

096

.70

096

.70

96.6

97.7

096

.698

.90

100

099

.30

00

00

96.8

Truc

ks0

480

048

046

10

471

00

01

00

00

096

% T

ruck

s0

3.3

00

3.3

03.

42.

30

3.4

1.1

00

00.

70

00

00

3.2

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

% B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Int

erse

ctio

n 10

(SR

62-Im

peria

l)S

ite C

ode

: 000

0001

0S

tart

Dat

e: 1

1/4/

2009

Pag

e N

o: 2

RT

62N

orth

boun

dR

T 62

Sout

hbou

ndIm

peria

lEa

stbo

und

Impe

rial

Wes

tbou

nd

Star

t Tim

eLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alIn

t. To

tal

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fro

m 0

7:00

AM

to 1

1:45

AM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n B

egin

s at 0

7:30

AM

07:3

0 A

M0

111

00

111

079

30

822

01

03

00

00

019

607

:45

AM

011

20

011

20

941

095

40

20

60

00

00

213

08:0

0 A

M0

800

080

068

10

694

05

09

00

00

015

808

:15

AM

165

00

660

801

081

10

40

50

00

00

152

Tota

l Vol

ume

136

80

036

90

321

60

327

110

120

230

00

00

719

% A

pp. T

otal

0.3

99.7

00

098

.21.

80

47.8

052

.20

00

00

PHF

.250

.821

.000

.000

.824

.000

.854

.500

.000

.861

.688

.000

.600

.000

.639

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.844

Pass

Veh

.1

352

00

353

029

56

030

111

012

023

00

00

067

7%

Pas

s Veh

.10

095

.70

095

.70

91.9

100

092

.010

00

100

010

00

00

00

94.2

Truc

ks0

160

016

026

00

260

00

00

00

00

042

% T

ruck

s0

4.3

00

4.3

08.

10

08.

00

00

00

00

00

05.

8B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0%

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fro

m 1

2:00

PM

to 0

5:45

PM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n B

egin

s at 0

4:30

PM

04:3

0 PM

410

70

011

10

932

095

110

00

110

00

00

217

04:4

5 PM

382

00

850

106

30

109

50

30

80

00

00

202

05:0

0 PM

011

30

011

30

115

30

118

120

70

190

00

00

250

05:1

5 PM

311

90

012

20

113

50

118

80

80

160

00

00

256

Tota

l Vol

ume

1042

10

043

10

427

130

440

360

180

540

00

00

925

% A

pp. T

otal

2.3

97.7

00

097

30

66.7

033

.30

00

00

PHF

.625

.884

.000

.000

.883

.000

.928

.650

.000

.932

.750

.000

.563

.000

.711

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.903

Pass

Veh

.10

413

00

423

042

113

043

436

018

054

00

00

091

1%

Pas

s Veh

.10

098

.10

098

.10

98.6

100

098

.610

00

100

010

00

00

00

98.5

Truc

ks0

80

08

06

00

60

00

00

00

00

014

% T

ruck

s0

1.9

00

1.9

01.

40

01.

40

00

00

00

00

01.

5B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0%

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Int

erse

ctio

n 11

(SR

62-

Eas

tSec

ond)

Site

Cod

e: 0

0000

011

Sta

rt D

ate

: 11/

3/20

09P

age

No

: 1

Gro

ups

Prin

ted-

Pas

s V

eh. -

Tru

cks

- Bik

esR

T 62

Nor

thbo

und

RT

62S

outh

boun

d2n

dE

astb

ound

2ND

Wes

tbou

ndS

tart

Tim

eLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Ped

sA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htP

eds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Ped

sA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htP

eds

App

. Tot

alIn

t. To

tal

07:0

0 A

M7

830

090

065

10

660

06

06

00

00

016

207

:15

AM

1076

00

860

740

074

00

100

100

00

00

170

07:3

0 A

M14

940

010

80

801

081

00

70

70

00

00

196

07:4

5 A

M12

112

00

124

093

00

931

013

014

00

00

023

1To

tal

4336

50

040

80

312

20

314

10

360

370

00

00

759

08:0

0 A

M11

840

095

094

00

941

010

011

00

00

020

008

:15

AM

774

00

810

104

00

104

20

120

140

00

00

199

08:3

0 A

M18

820

010

00

910

091

00

130

130

00

00

204

08:4

5 A

M19

870

010

60

690

069

00

70

70

00

00

182

Tota

l55

327

00

382

035

80

035

83

042

045

00

00

078

5

***

BR

EA

K *

**

04:0

0 P

M29

117

00

146

011

90

011

90

028

028

00

00

029

304

:15

PM

2110

40

012

50

115

00

115

00

180

180

00

00

258

04:3

0 P

M25

100

00

125

011

72

011

90

028

028

00

00

027

204

:45

PM

1996

00

115

010

81

010

90

09

09

00

00

023

3To

tal

9441

70

051

10

459

30

462

00

830

830

00

00

1056

05:0

0 P

M24

112

00

136

013

53

013

84

027

031

00

00

030

505

:15

PM

3398

00

131

095

10

961

020

021

00

00

024

805

:30

PM

1386

00

990

891

090

10

150

160

00

00

205

05:4

5 P

M17

660

083

081

20

831

017

018

00

00

018

4To

tal

8736

20

044

90

400

70

407

70

790

860

00

00

942

Gra

nd T

otal

279

1471

00

1750

015

2912

015

4111

024

00

251

00

00

035

42A

pprc

h %

15.9

84.1

00

099

.20.

80

4.4

095

.60

00

00

Tota

l %7.

941

.50

049

.40

43.2

0.3

043

.50.

30

6.8

07.

10

00

00

Pas

s V

eh.

272

1430

00

1702

014

7611

014

879

023

70

246

00

00

034

35%

Pas

s V

eh.

97.5

97.2

00

97.3

096

.591

.70

96.5

81.8

098

.80

980

00

00

97Tr

ucks

741

00

480

531

054

20

30

50

00

00

107

% T

ruck

s2.

52.

80

02.

70

3.5

8.3

03.

518

.20

1.2

02

00

00

03

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

% B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Int

erse

ctio

n 11

(SR

62-

Eas

tSec

ond)

Site

Cod

e: 0

0000

011

Sta

rt D

ate

: 11/

3/20

09P

age

No

: 2

RT

62N

orth

boun

dR

T 62

Sou

thbo

und

2nd

Eas

tbou

nd2N

DW

estb

ound

Sta

rt Ti

me

Left

Thru

Rig

htP

eds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Ped

sA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htP

eds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Ped

sA

pp. T

otal

Int.

Tota

l

Pea

k H

our A

naly

sis

From

07:

00 A

M to

11:

45 A

M -

Pea

k 1

of 1

Pea

k H

our f

or E

ntire

Inte

rsec

tion

Beg

ins

at 0

7:45

AM

07:4

5 A

M12

112

00

124

093

00

931

013

014

00

00

023

108

:00

AM

1184

00

950

940

094

10

100

110

00

00

200

08:1

5 A

M7

740

081

010

40

010

42

012

014

00

00

019

908

:30

AM

1882

00

100

091

00

910

013

013

00

00

020

4To

tal V

olum

e48

352

00

400

038

20

038

24

048

052

00

00

083

4%

App

. Tot

al12

880

00

100

00

7.7

092

.30

00

00

PH

F.6

67.7

86.0

00.0

00.8

06.0

00.9

18.0

00.0

00.9

18.5

00.0

00.9

23.0

00.9

29.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.9

03P

ass

Veh

.46

342

00

388

035

40

035

42

045

047

00

00

078

9%

Pas

s V

eh.

95.8

97.2

00

97.0

092

.70

092

.750

.00

93.8

090

.40

00

00

94.6

Truc

ks2

100

012

028

00

282

03

05

00

00

045

% T

ruck

s4.

22.

80

03.

00

7.3

00

7.3

50.0

06.

30

9.6

00

00

05.

4B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0%

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Pea

k H

our A

naly

sis

From

12:

00 P

M to

05:

45 P

M -

Pea

k 1

of 1

Pea

k H

our f

or E

ntire

Inte

rsec

tion

Beg

ins

at 0

4:15

PM

04:1

5 P

M21

104

00

125

011

50

011

50

018

018

00

00

025

804

:30

PM

2510

00

012

50

117

20

119

00

280

280

00

00

272

04:4

5 P

M19

960

011

50

108

10

109

00

90

90

00

00

233

05:0

0 P

M24

112

00

136

013

53

013

84

027

031

00

00

030

5To

tal V

olum

e89

412

00

501

047

56

048

14

082

086

00

00

010

68%

App

. Tot

al17

.882

.20

00

98.8

1.2

04.

70

95.3

00

00

0P

HF

.890

.920

.000

.000

.921

.000

.880

.500

.000

.871

.250

.000

.732

.000

.694

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.875

Pas

s V

eh.

8940

50

049

40

463

60

469

40

820

860

00

00

1049

% P

ass

Veh

.10

098

.30

098

.60

97.5

100

097

.510

00

100

010

00

00

00

98.2

Truc

ks0

70

07

012

00

120

00

00

00

00

019

% T

ruck

s0

1.7

00

1.4

02.

50

02.

50

00

00

00

00

01.

8B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0%

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Int

erse

ctio

n 12

(Wils

on-E

astS

econ

d)S

ite C

ode

: 000

0001

2S

tart

Dat

e: 1

1/18

/200

9P

age

No

: 1

Gro

ups P

rinte

d- P

ass V

eh. -

Tru

cks -

Bik

esW

ilson

Nor

thbo

und

Wils

onSo

uthb

ound

2nd

Alle

yEa

stbo

und

2nd

St.

Wes

tbou

ndSt

art T

ime

Left

Thru

Rig

htPe

dsA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htPe

dsA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htPe

dsA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htPe

dsA

pp. T

otal

Int.

Tota

l07

:00

AM

04

50

918

10

120

00

00

02

011

013

4207

:15

AM

014

10

1517

00

219

10

00

12

013

015

5007

:30

AM

05

71

1317

50

224

10

01

26

017

225

6407

:45

AM

013

61

2029

30

234

00

00

06

019

227

81To

tal

036

192

5781

90

797

20

01

316

060

480

237

08:0

0 A

M0

133

016

255

03

331

00

01

30

291

3383

08:1

5 A

M0

113

115

239

30

351

00

01

50

250

3081

08:3

0 A

M2

89

120

153

21

210

00

00

50

203

2869

08:4

5 A

M1

1210

023

201

03

240

00

00

101

250

3683

Tota

l3

4425

274

8318

57

113

20

00

223

199

412

731

6

***

BR

EAK

***

04:0

0 PM

219

140

3561

121

478

21

10

419

053

072

189

04:1

5 PM

015

200

3551

40

055

20

10

317

147

469

162

04:3

0 PM

111

160

2858

110

978

00

12

317

246

166

175

04:4

5 PM

012

220

3459

81

472

10

11

329

045

074

183

Tota

l3

5772

013

222

935

217

283

51

43

1382

319

15

281

709

05:0

0 PM

08

170

2558

130

071

21

20

519

034

861

162

05:1

5 PM

08

80

1638

81

148

10

21

413

243

765

133

05:3

0 PM

112

203

3645

51

1566

00

25

714

246

365

174

05:4

5 PM

08

170

2532

90

748

00

11

215

139

257

132

Tota

l1

3662

310

217

335

223

233

31

77

1861

516

220

248

601

Gra

nd T

otal

717

317

87

365

566

979

5472

612

211

1136

182

951

233

736

1863

App

rch

%1.

947

.448

.81.

978

13.4

1.2

7.4

33.3

5.6

30.6

30.6

24.7

1.2

69.6

4.5

Tota

l %0.

49.

39.

60.

419

.630

.45.

20.

52.

939

0.6

0.1

0.6

0.6

1.9

9.8

0.5

27.5

1.8

39.5

Pass

Veh

.7

172

178

736

456

397

953

722

112

1111

3518

09

506

3172

618

47%

Pas

s Veh

.10

099

.410

010

099

.799

.510

010

098

.199

.491

.710

010

010

097

.298

.910

098

.893

.998

.699

.1Tr

ucks

01

00

13

00

03

10

00

11

06

07

12%

Tru

cks

00.

60

00.

30.

50

00

0.4

8.3

00

02.

80.

50

1.2

01

0.6

Bik

es0

00

00

00

01

10

00

00

10

02

34

% B

ikes

00

00

00

00

1.9

0.1

00

00

00.

50

06.

10.

40.

2

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Int

erse

ctio

n 12

(Wils

on-E

astS

econ

d)S

ite C

ode

: 000

0001

2S

tart

Dat

e: 1

1/18

/200

9P

age

No

: 2

Wils

onN

orth

boun

dW

ilson

Sout

hbou

nd2n

d A

lley

East

boun

d2n

d St

.W

estb

ound

Star

t Tim

eLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alIn

t. To

tal

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fro

m 0

7:00

AM

to 1

1:45

AM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n B

egin

s at 0

8:00

AM

08:0

0 A

M0

133

016

255

03

331

00

01

30

291

3383

08:1

5 A

M0

113

115

239

30

351

00

01

50

250

3081

08:3

0 A

M2

89

120

153

21

210

00

00

50

203

2869

08:4

5 A

M1

1210

023

201

03

240

00

00

101

250

3683

Tota

l Vol

ume

344

252

7483

185

711

32

00

02

231

994

127

316

% A

pp. T

otal

4.1

59.5

33.8

2.7

73.5

15.9

4.4

6.2

100

00

018

.10.

878

3.1

PHF

.375

.846

.625

.500

.804

.830

.500

.417

.583

.807

.500

.000

.000

.000

.500

.575

.250

.853

.333

.882

.952

Pass

Veh

.3

4325

273

8118

57

111

20

00

223

197

412

531

1%

Pas

s Veh

.10

097

.710

010

098

.697

.610

010

010

098

.210

00

00

100

100

100

98.0

100

98.4

98.4

Truc

ks0

10

01

20

00

20

00

00

00

20

25

% T

ruck

s0

2.3

00

1.4

2.4

00

01.

80

00

00

00

2.0

01.

61.

6B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0%

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fro

m 1

2:00

PM

to 0

5:45

PM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n B

egin

s at 0

4:00

PM

04:0

0 PM

219

140

3561

121

478

21

10

419

053

072

189

04:1

5 PM

015

200

3551

40

055

20

10

317

147

469

162

04:3

0 PM

111

160

2858

110

978

00

12

317

246

166

175

04:4

5 PM

012

220

3459

81

472

10

11

329

045

074

183

Tota

l Vol

ume

357

720

132

229

352

1728

35

14

313

823

191

528

170

9%

App

. Tot

al2.

343

.254

.50

80.9

12.4

0.7

638

.57.

730

.823

.129

.21.

168

1.8

PHF

.375

.750

.818

.000

.943

.939

.729

.500

.472

.907

.625

.250

1.00

0.3

75.8

13.7

07.3

75.9

01.3

13.9

49.9

38Pa

ss V

eh.

357

720

132

229

352

1728

35

14

313

813

191

528

070

8%

Pas

s Veh

.10

010

010

00

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

98.8

100

100

100

99.6

99.9

Truc

ks0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

% T

ruck

s0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

10

00

11

% B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

01.

20

00

0.4

0.1

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Int

erse

ctio

n 13

(Eas

tSec

ond-

Pin

e)S

ite C

ode

: 000

0001

3S

tart

Dat

e: 1

1/12

/200

9P

age

No

: 1

Gro

ups P

rinte

d- P

ass V

eh. -

Tru

cks -

Bik

esPi

neN

orth

boun

dPa

rkin

g Lo

tSo

uthb

ound

2nd

East

boun

d2n

dW

estb

ound

Star

t Tim

eLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alIn

t. To

tal

07:0

0 A

M0

00

11

11

13

60

140

115

09

00

931

07:1

5 A

M0

00

11

01

40

51

200

021

113

40

1845

07:3

0 A

M0

00

00

10

20

31

200

021

018

01

1943

07:4

5 A

M0

01

01

30

41

80

272

029

021

00

2159

Tota

l0

01

23

52

114

222

812

186

161

41

6717

8

08:0

0 A

M1

00

01

00

71

80

360

036

023

10

2469

08:1

5 A

M0

01

01

10

60

71

330

034

026

10

2769

08:3

0 A

M1

00

12

10

52

81

211

023

027

00

2760

08:4

5 A

M1

00

12

10

64

112

300

133

021

11

2369

Tota

l3

01

26

30

247

344

120

11

126

097

31

101

267

***

BR

EAK

***

04:0

0 PM

01

05

69

19

423

465

21

721

693

073

174

04:1

5 PM

10

44

98

011

726

466

00

701

435

049

154

04:3

0 PM

00

32

51

011

416

675

22

852

582

062

168

04:4

5 PM

10

20

35

113

625

569

11

760

630

063

167

Tota

l2

19

1123

232

4421

9019

275

54

303

423

310

024

766

3

05:0

0 PM

01

03

48

111

1131

662

20

701

612

064

169

05:1

5 PM

10

10

24

27

1326

065

30

681

594

064

160

05:3

0 PM

10

02

36

06

113

247

10

500

512

053

119

05:4

5 PM

00

11

23

06

211

445

01

502

374

043

106

Tota

l2

12

611

213

3027

8112

219

61

238

420

812

022

455

4

Gra

nd T

otal

72

1321

4352

710

959

227

3769

514

775

39

599

292

639

1662

App

rch

%16

.34.

730

.248

.822

.93.

148

264.

992

.31.

90.

91.

493

.74.

50.

3To

tal %

0.4

0.1

0.8

1.3

2.6

3.1

0.4

6.6

3.5

13.7

2.2

41.8

0.8

0.4

45.3

0.5

361.

70.

138

.4Pa

ss V

eh.

72

1221

4252

710

955

223

3769

214

775

09

595

292

635

1650

% P

ass V

eh.

100

100

92.3

100

97.7

100

100

100

93.2

98.2

100

99.6

100

100

99.6

100

99.3

100

100

99.4

99.3

Truc

ks0

01

01

00

00

00

30

03

04

00

48

% T

ruck

s0

07.

70

2.3

00

00

00

0.4

00

0.4

00.

70

00.

60.

5B

ikes

00

00

00

00

44

00

00

00

00

00

4%

Bik

es0

00

00

00

06.

81.

80

00

00

00

00

00.

2

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Int

erse

ctio

n 13

(Eas

tSec

ond-

Pin

e)S

ite C

ode

: 000

0001

3S

tart

Dat

e: 1

1/12

/200

9P

age

No

: 2

Pine

Nor

thbo

und

Park

ing

Lot

Sout

hbou

nd2n

dEa

stbo

und

2nd

Wes

tbou

nd

Star

t Tim

eLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alIn

t. To

tal

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fro

m 0

7:00

AM

to 1

1:45

AM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n B

egin

s at 0

8:00

AM

08:0

0 A

M1

00

01

00

71

80

360

036

023

10

2469

08:1

5 A

M0

01

01

10

60

71

330

034

026

10

2769

08:3

0 A

M1

00

12

10

52

81

211

023

027

00

2760

08:4

5 A

M1

00

12

10

64

112

300

133

021

11

2369

Tota

l Vol

ume

30

12

63

024

734

412

01

112

60

973

110

126

7%

App

. Tot

al50

016

.733

.38.

80

70.6

20.6

3.2

95.2

0.8

0.8

096

31

PHF

.750

.000

.250

.500

.750

.750

.000

.857

.438

.773

.500

.833

.250

.250

.875

.000

.898

.750

.250

.935

.967

Pass

Veh

.3

01

26

30

247

344

119

11

125

096

31

100

265

% P

ass V

eh.

100

010

010

010

010

00

100

100

100

100

99.2

100

100

99.2

099

.010

010

099

.099

.3Tr

ucks

00

00

00

00

00

01

00

10

10

01

2%

Tru

cks

00

00

00

00

00

00.

80

00.

80

1.0

00

1.0

0.7

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

% B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fro

m 1

2:00

PM

to 0

5:45

PM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n B

egin

s at 0

4:30

PM

04:3

0 PM

00

32

51

011

416

675

22

852

582

062

168

04:4

5 PM

10

20

35

113

625

569

11

760

630

063

167

05:0

0 PM

01

03

48

111

1131

662

20

701

612

064

169

05:1

5 PM

10

10

24

27

1326

065

30

681

594

064

160

Tota

l Vol

ume

21

65

1418

442

3498

1727

18

329

94

241

80

253

664

% A

pp. T

otal

14.3

7.1

42.9

35.7

18.4

4.1

42.9

34.7

5.7

90.6

2.7

11.

695

.33.

20

PHF

.500

.250

.500

.417

.700

.563

.500

.808

.654

.790

.708

.903

.667

.375

.879

.500

.956

.500

.000

.988

.982

Pass

Veh

.2

16

514

184

4233

9717

271

83

299

424

18

025

366

3%

Pas

s Veh

.10

010

010

010

010

010

010

010

097

.199

.010

010

010

010

010

010

010

010

00

100

99.8

Truc

ks0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

% T

ruck

s0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Bik

es0

00

00

00

01

10

00

00

00

00

01

% B

ikes

00

00

00

00

2.9

1.0

00

00

00

00

00

0.2

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Int

erse

ctio

n 14

-AM

(Eas

tSec

ond-

Impe

rial)

Site

Cod

e: 0

0000

014

Sta

rt D

ate

: 11/

18/2

009

Pag

e N

o: 1

Gro

ups P

rinte

d- P

ass V

eh. -

Tru

cks -

Bik

es

Nor

thbo

und

Sout

hbou

ndEa

stbo

und

Wes

tbou

ndSt

art T

ime

Left

Thru

Rig

htPe

dsA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htPe

dsA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htPe

dsA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htPe

dsA

pp. T

otal

Int.

Tota

l07

:00

AM

00

03

30

00

00

16

00

70

71

08

1807

:15

AM

21

12

60

00

00

111

10

130

130

013

3207

:30

AM

22

10

50

10

01

014

10

150

92

011

3207

:45

AM

00

00

00

03

03

022

30

250

160

016

44To

tal

43

25

140

13

04

253

50

600

453

048

126

08:0

0 A

M3

40

07

00

21

31

170

220

015

10

1646

08:1

5 A

M0

10

12

00

10

12

141

017

015

00

1535

08:3

0 A

M0

00

00

00

31

40

150

116

014

00

1434

08:4

5 A

M2

12

05

00

30

32

120

115

025

10

2649

Tota

l5

62

114

00

92

115

581

468

069

20

7116

4

Gra

nd T

otal

99

46

280

112

215

711

16

412

80

114

50

119

290

App

rch

%32

.132

.114

.321

.40

6.7

8013

.35.

586

.74.

73.

10

95.8

4.2

0To

tal %

3.1

3.1

1.4

2.1

9.7

00.

34.

10.

75.

22.

438

.32.

11.

444

.10

39.3

1.7

041

Pass

Veh

.9

94

628

01

122

155

108

64

123

011

05

011

528

1%

Pas

s Veh

.10

010

010

010

010

00

100

100

100

100

71.4

97.3

100

100

96.1

096

.510

00

96.6

96.9

Truc

ks0

00

00

00

00

02

20

04

04

00

48

% T

ruck

s0

00

00

00

00

028

.61.

80

03.

10

3.5

00

3.4

2.8

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

10

01

00

00

01

% B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00.

90

00.

80

00

00

0.3

Nor

thbo

und

Sout

hbou

ndEa

stbo

und

Wes

tbou

ndSt

art T

ime

Left

Thru

Rig

htPe

dsA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htPe

dsA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htPe

dsA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htPe

dsA

pp. T

otal

Int.

Tota

lPe

ak H

our A

naly

sis F

rom

07:

00 A

M to

08:

45 A

M -

Peak

1 o

f 1Pe

ak H

our f

or E

ntire

Inte

rsec

tion

Beg

ins a

t 08:

00 A

M08

:00

AM

34

00

70

02

13

117

02

200

151

016

4608

:15

AM

01

01

20

01

01

214

10

170

150

015

3508

:30

AM

00

00

00

03

14

015

01

160

140

014

3408

:45

AM

21

20

50

03

03

212

01

150

251

026

49To

tal V

olum

e5

62

114

00

92

115

581

468

069

20

7116

4%

App

. Tot

al35

.742

.914

.37.

10

081

.818

.27.

485

.31.

55.

90

97.2

2.8

0PH

F.4

17.3

75.2

50.2

50.5

00.0

00.0

00.7

50.5

00.6

88.6

25.8

53.2

50.5

00.8

50.0

00.6

90.5

00.0

00.6

83.8

37Pa

ss V

eh.

56

21

140

09

211

457

14

660

682

070

161

% P

ass V

eh.

100

100

100

100

100

00

100

100

100

80.0

98.3

100

100

97.1

098

.610

00

98.6

98.2

Truc

ks0

00

00

00

00

01

10

02

01

00

13

% T

ruck

s0

00

00

00

00

020

.01.

70

02.

90

1.4

00

1.4

1.8

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Int

erse

ctio

n 14

-PM

(Eas

tSec

ond-

Impe

rial)

Site

Cod

e: 0

0000

014

Sta

rt D

ate

: 11/

4/20

09P

age

No

: 1

Gro

ups

Prin

ted-

Pas

s V

eh. -

Tru

cks

- Bik

es

Nor

thbo

und

Sou

thbo

und

Eas

tbou

ndW

estb

ound

Sta

rt Ti

me

Left

Thru

Rig

htP

eds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Ped

sA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htP

eds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Ped

sA

pp. T

otal

Int.

Tota

l04

:00

PM

251

42

595

397

051

61

20

92

413

019

138

04:1

5 P

M2

322

137

250

00

524

00

15

03

50

810

204

:30

PM

026

01

272

415

149

42

10

73

112

016

9904

:45

PM

031

10

323

434

252

53

20

101

310

014

108

Tota

l4

140

74

155

1217

316

320

419

65

131

611

400

5744

7

05:0

0 P

M2

250

128

645

51

574

20

06

02

141

1710

805

:15

PM

129

10

311

335

140

23

10

62

010

012

8905

:30

PM

027

00

270

292

132

31

02

60

111

012

7705

:45

PM

127

01

292

256

235

40

20

60

212

014

84To

tal

410

81

211

59

132

185

164

136

32

242

547

155

358

Gra

nd T

otal

824

88

627

021

305

348

368

3212

83

558

1687

111

280

5A

pprc

h %

391

.93

2.2

5.7

82.9

9.2

2.2

58.2

21.8

14.5

5.5

7.1

14.3

77.7

0.9

Tota

l %1

30.8

10.

733

.52.

637

.94.

21

45.7

41.

51

0.4

6.8

12

10.8

0.1

13.9

Pas

s V

eh.

824

88

627

021

305

348

368

3212

83

558

1687

111

280

5%

Pas

s V

eh.

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

Truc

ks0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

% T

ruck

s0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

% B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

Nor

thbo

und

Sou

thbo

und

Eas

tbou

ndW

estb

ound

Sta

rt Ti

me

Left

Thru

Rig

htP

eds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Ped

sA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htP

eds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Ped

sA

pp. T

otal

Int.

Tota

lP

eak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fr

om 0

4:00

PM

to 0

5:45

PM

- P

eak

1 of

1P

eak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n B

egin

s at

04:

00 P

M04

:00

PM

251

42

595

397

051

61

20

92

413

019

138

04:1

5 P

M2

322

137

250

00

524

00

15

03

50

810

204

:30

PM

026

01

272

415

149

42

10

73

112

016

9904

:45

PM

031

10

323

434

252

53

20

101

310

014

108

Tota

l Vol

ume

414

07

415

512

173

163

204

196

51

316

1140

057

447

% A

pp. T

otal

2.6

90.3

4.5

2.6

5.9

84.8

7.8

1.5

61.3

19.4

16.1

3.2

10.5

19.3

70.2

0P

HF

.500

.686

.438

.500

.657

.600

.865

.571

.375

.981

.792

.500

.625

.250

.775

.500

.688

.769

.000

.750

.810

Pas

s V

eh.

414

07

415

512

173

163

204

196

51

316

1140

057

447

% P

ass

Veh

.10

010

010

010

010

010

010

010

010

010

010

010

010

010

010

010

010

010

00

100

100

Truc

ks0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

% T

ruck

s0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

���������

���������� ��

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Fro

nt-P

etro

leum

Site

Cod

e: 0

0000

001

Sta

rt D

ate

: 7/1

5/20

10P

age

No

: 1

Gro

ups P

rinte

d- P

ass.

Veh

. - T

ruck

s - B

ikes

Nor

thbo

und

Sout

hbou

ndEa

stbo

und

Wes

tbou

ndSt

art T

ime

Left

Thru

Rig

htPe

dsA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htPe

dsA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htPe

dsA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htPe

dsA

pp. T

otal

Int.

Tota

l07

:00

AM

024

00

240

410

041

10

00

119

048

067

133

07:1

5 A

M0

300

232

055

00

551

03

04

80

480

5614

707

:30

AM

034

05

390

520

052

50

20

718

073

091

189

07:4

5 A

M0

440

044

059

00

599

00

09

270

680

9520

7To

tal

013

20

713

90

207

00

207

160

50

2172

023

70

309

676

08:0

0 A

M0

300

030

054

00

547

00

07

260

501

7716

808

:15

AM

030

00

300

610

061

40

12

726

072

098

196

08:3

0 A

M0

210

223

070

00

706

00

28

320

480

8018

108

:45

AM

035

01

360

650

065

30

12

625

040

065

172

Tota

l0

116

03

119

025

00

025

020

02

628

109

021

01

320

717

***

BR

EAK

***

04:0

0 PM

042

02

440

106

01

107

70

34

1453

077

013

029

504

:15

PM0

400

040

012

80

012

89

01

111

450

731

119

298

04:3

0 PM

046

00

460

140

01

141

40

75

1655

061

011

631

904

:45

PM0

510

152

013

40

013

42

02

04

420

650

107

297

Tota

l0

179

03

182

050

80

251

022

013

1045

195

027

61

472

1209

05:0

0 PM

045

00

450

133

00

133

100

41

1548

064

011

230

505

:15

PM0

370

138

014

50

114

63

03

17

410

700

111

302

05:3

0 PM

034

01

350

116

00

116

80

011

1942

054

096

266

05:4

5 PM

035

04

390

106

00

106

30

43

1036

054

090

245

Tota

l0

151

06

157

050

00

150

124

011

1651

167

024

20

409

1118

Gra

nd T

otal

057

80

1959

70

1465

03

1468

820

3132

145

543

096

52

1510

3720

App

rch

%0

96.8

03.

20

99.8

00.

256

.60

21.4

22.1

360

63.9

0.1

Tota

l %0

15.5

00.

516

039

.40

0.1

39.5

2.2

00.

80.

93.

914

.60

25.9

0.1

40.6

Pass

. Veh

.0

571

017

588

014

290

114

3082

031

2613

954

00

939

214

8136

38%

Pas

s. V

eh.

098

.80

89.5

98.5

097

.50

33.3

97.4

100

010

081

.295

.999

.40

97.3

100

98.1

97.8

Truc

ks0

70

07

036

00

360

00

00

30

260

2972

% T

ruck

s0

1.2

00

1.2

02.

50

02.

50

00

00

0.6

02.

70

1.9

1.9

Bik

es0

00

22

00

02

20

00

66

00

00

010

% B

ikes

00

010

.50.

30

00

66.7

0.1

00

018

.84.

10

00

00

0.3

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Fro

nt-P

etro

leum

Site

Cod

e: 0

0000

001

Sta

rt D

ate

: 7/1

5/20

10P

age

No

: 2

Nor

thbo

und

Sout

hbou

ndEa

stbo

und

Wes

tbou

nd

Star

t Tim

eLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alIn

t. To

tal

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fro

m 0

7:00

AM

to 1

1:45

AM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n B

egin

s at 0

7:30

AM

07:3

0 A

M0

340

539

052

00

525

02

07

180

730

9118

907

:45

AM

044

00

440

590

059

90

00

927

068

095

207

08:0

0 A

M0

300

030

054

00

547

00

07

260

501

7716

808

:15

AM

030

00

300

610

061

40

12

726

072

098

196

Tota

l Vol

ume

013

80

514

30

226

00

226

250

32

3097

026

31

361

760

% A

pp. T

otal

096

.50

3.5

010

00

083

.30

106.

726

.90

72.9

0.3

PHF

.000

.784

.000

.250

.813

.000

.926

.000

.000

.926

.694

.000

.375

.250

.833

.898

.000

.901

.250

.921

.918

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fro

m 1

2:00

PM

to 0

5:45

PM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n B

egin

s at 0

4:30

PM

04:3

0 PM

046

00

460

140

01

141

40

75

1655

061

011

631

904

:45

PM0

510

152

013

40

013

42

02

04

420

650

107

297

05:0

0 PM

045

00

450

133

00

133

100

41

1548

064

011

230

505

:15

PM0

370

138

014

50

114

63

03

17

410

700

111

302

Tota

l Vol

ume

017

90

218

10

552

02

554

190

167

4218

60

260

044

612

23%

App

. Tot

al0

98.9

01.

10

99.6

00.

445

.20

38.1

16.7

41.7

058

.30

PHF

.000

.877

.000

.500

.870

.000

.952

.000

.500

.949

.475

.000

.571

.350

.656

.845

.000

.929

.000

.961

.958

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Fro

nt-S

tate

Site

Cod

e: 0

0001

234

Sta

rt D

ate

: 7/8

/201

0P

age

No

: 1

Gro

ups P

rinte

d- P

ass.

Veh

. - T

ruck

sSt

ate

Nor

thbo

und

Stat

eSo

uthb

ound

Fron

tEa

stbo

und

Fron

tW

estb

ound

Star

t Tim

eLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alIn

t. To

tal

07:0

0 A

M0

160

016

040

130

530

00

00

045

310

7614

507

:15

AM

025

03

280

4311

054

00

01

11

4960

011

019

307

:30

AM

025

02

270

7122

699

00

00

00

7059

012

925

507

:45

AM

038

00

380

7029

610

50

00

00

151

840

136

279

Tota

l0

104

05

109

022

475

1231

10

00

11

221

523

40

451

872

08:0

0 A

M0

230

023

073

260

990

00

00

051

520

103

225

08:1

5 A

M0

320

133

059

214

840

00

00

551

620

118

235

08:3

0 A

M0

130

013

067

360

103

00

00

02

5157

011

022

608

:45

AM

027

04

310

8529

011

40

00

00

254

542

112

257

Tota

l0

950

510

00

284

112

440

00

00

00

920

722

52

443

943

***

BR

EAK

***

04:0

0 PM

033

02

350

103

481

152

00

00

07

7411

41

196

383

04:1

5 PM

131

02

340

9957

115

70

00

00

863

101

017

236

304

:30

PM0

520

052

099

612

162

00

00

03

7110

80

182

396

04:4

5 PM

145

00

460

112

511

164

00

00

07

7085

016

237

2To

tal

216

10

416

70

413

217

563

50

00

00

2527

840

81

712

1514

05:0

0 PM

045

01

460

101

443

148

00

00

02

8811

90

209

403

05:1

5 PM

037

02

390

128

585

191

00

00

02

6013

10

193

423

05:3

0 PM

050

00

500

101

605

166

00

00

03

5811

40

175

391

05:4

5 PM

040

03

430

6832

310

30

00

00

860

124

019

233

8To

tal

017

20

617

80

398

194

1660

80

00

00

1526

648

80

769

1555

Gra

nd T

otal

253

20

2055

40

1319

598

3719

540

00

11

5196

613

553

2375

4884

App

rch

%0.

496

03.

60

67.5

30.6

1.9

00

010

02.

140

.757

.10.

1To

tal %

010

.90

0.4

11.3

027

12.2

0.8

400

00

00

119

.827

.70.

148

.6Pa

ss. V

eh.

253

00

2055

20

1310

594

3719

410

00

11

5193

113

513

2336

4830

% P

ass.

Veh

.10

099

.60

100

99.6

099

.399

.310

099

.30

00

100

100

100

96.4

99.7

100

98.4

98.9

Truc

ks0

20

02

09

40

130

00

00

035

40

3954

% T

ruck

s0

0.4

00

0.4

00.

70.

70

0.7

00

00

00

3.6

0.3

01.

61.

1

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Fro

nt-S

tate

Site

Cod

e: 0

0001

234

Sta

rt D

ate

: 7/8

/201

0P

age

No

: 2

Stat

eN

orth

boun

dSt

ate

Sout

hbou

ndFr

ont

East

boun

dFr

ont

Wes

tbou

nd

Star

t Tim

eLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alIn

t. To

tal

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fro

m 0

7:00

AM

to 1

2:30

PM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n B

egin

s at 0

7:30

AM

07:3

0 A

M0

250

227

071

226

990

00

00

070

590

129

255

07:4

5 A

M0

380

038

070

296

105

00

00

01

5184

013

627

908

:00

AM

023

00

230

7326

099

00

00

00

5152

010

322

508

:15

AM

032

01

330

5921

484

00

00

05

5162

011

823

5To

tal V

olum

e0

118

03

121

027

398

1638

70

00

00

622

325

70

486

994

% A

pp. T

otal

097

.50

2.5

070

.525

.34.

10

00

01.

245

.952

.90

PHF

.000

.776

.000

.375

.796

.000

.935

.845

.667

.921

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.300

.796

.765

.000

.893

.891

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fro

m 1

2:45

PM

to 0

5:45

PM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n B

egin

s at 0

4:30

PM

04:3

0 PM

052

00

520

9961

216

20

00

00

371

108

018

239

604

:45

PM1

450

046

011

251

116

40

00

00

770

850

162

372

05:0

0 PM

045

01

460

101

443

148

00

00

02

8811

90

209

403

05:1

5 PM

037

02

390

128

585

191

00

00

02

6013

10

193

423

Tota

l Vol

ume

117

90

318

30

440

214

1166

50

00

00

1428

944

30

746

1594

% A

pp. T

otal

0.5

97.8

01.

60

66.2

32.2

1.7

00

00

1.9

38.7

59.4

0PH

F.2

50.8

61.0

00.3

75.8

80.0

00.8

59.8

77.5

50.8

70.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.5

00.8

21.8

45.0

00.8

92.9

42

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Fro

nt-W

ilson

Site

Cod

e: 0

0000

006

Sta

rt D

ate

: 7/8

/201

0P

age

No

: 1

Gro

ups P

rinte

d- P

ass.

Veh

. - T

ruck

s - B

ikes

Wils

onN

orth

boun

dSo

uthb

ound

Fron

tEa

stbo

und

Fron

tW

estb

ound

Star

t Tim

eLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alIn

t. To

tal

07:0

0 A

M19

00

019

00

00

00

00

00

061

00

6180

07:1

5 A

M29

00

029

00

00

00

00

00

080

00

8010

907

:30

AM

310

00

310

00

11

00

00

00

970

198

130

07:4

5 A

M29

00

029

00

00

00

00

00

010

40

010

413

3To

tal

108

00

010

80

00

11

00

00

00

342

01

343

452

08:0

0 A

M33

00

033

00

00

00

00

00

074

00

7410

708

:15

AM

340

00

340

00

00

00

00

00

820

082

116

08:3

0 A

M28

00

028

00

01

10

00

00

076

00

7610

508

:45

AM

300

00

300

00

00

00

00

00

830

083

113

Tota

l12

50

00

125

00

01

10

00

00

031

50

031

544

1

***

BR

EAK

***

04:0

0 PM

730

00

730

00

11

00

01

10

131

00

131

206

04:1

5 PM

600

00

600

00

00

00

00

00

110

00

110

170

04:3

0 PM

670

01

680

00

00

00

00

00

107

00

107

175

04:4

5 PM

580

05

630

00

11

00

01

10

115

00

115

180

Tota

l25

80

06

264

00

02

20

00

22

046

30

046

373

1

05:0

0 PM

620

00

620

00

00

00

00

00

125

00

125

187

05:1

5 PM

580

01

590

00

00

00

00

00

132

00

132

191

05:3

0 PM

510

00

510

00

00

00

00

01

121

00

122

173

05:4

5 PM

700

03

730

00

00

00

04

40

970

097

174

Tota

l24

10

04

245

00

00

00

00

44

147

50

047

672

5

Gra

nd T

otal

732

00

1074

20

00

44

00

06

61

1595

01

1597

2349

App

rch

%98

.70

01.

30

00

100

00

010

00.

199

.90

0.1

Tota

l %31

.20

00.

431

.60

00

0.2

0.2

00

00.

30.

30

67.9

00

68Pa

ss. V

eh.

732

00

1074

20

00

44

00

06

61

1595

01

1597

2349

% P

ass.

Veh

.10

00

010

010

00

00

100

100

00

010

010

010

010

00

100

100

100

Truc

ks0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

% T

ruck

s0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

% B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Fro

nt-W

ilson

Site

Cod

e: 0

0000

006

Sta

rt D

ate

: 7/8

/201

0P

age

No

: 2

Wils

onN

orth

boun

dSo

uthb

ound

Fron

tEa

stbo

und

Fron

tW

estb

ound

Star

t Tim

eLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alIn

t. To

tal

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fro

m 0

7:00

AM

to 1

2:30

PM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n B

egin

s at 0

7:30

AM

07:3

0 A

M31

00

031

00

01

10

00

00

097

01

9813

007

:45

AM

290

00

290

00

00

00

00

00

104

00

104

133

08:0

0 A

M33

00

033

00

00

00

00

00

074

00

7410

708

:15

AM

340

00

340

00

00

00

00

00

820

082

116

Tota

l Vol

ume

127

00

012

70

00

11

00

00

00

357

01

358

486

% A

pp. T

otal

100

00

00

00

100

00

00

099

.70

0.3

PHF

.934

.000

.000

.000

.934

.000

.000

.000

.250

.250

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.858

.000

.250

.861

.914

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fro

m 1

2:45

PM

to 0

5:45

PM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n B

egin

s at 0

4:30

PM

04:3

0 PM

670

01

680

00

00

00

00

00

107

00

107

175

04:4

5 PM

580

05

630

00

11

00

01

10

115

00

115

180

05:0

0 PM

620

00

620

00

00

00

00

00

125

00

125

187

05:1

5 PM

580

01

590

00

00

00

00

00

132

00

132

191

Tota

l Vol

ume

245

00

725

20

00

11

00

01

10

479

00

479

733

% A

pp. T

otal

97.2

00

2.8

00

010

00

00

100

010

00

0PH

F.9

14.0

00.0

00.3

50.9

26.0

00.0

00.0

00.2

50.2

50.0

00.0

00.0

00.2

50.2

50.0

00.9

07.0

00.0

00.9

07.9

59

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Firs

t-Pet

role

umS

ite C

ode

: 000

0000

2S

tart

Dat

e: 7

/8/2

010

Pag

e N

o: 1

Gro

ups P

rinte

d- P

ass.

Veh

. - T

ruck

s - B

ikes

Petro

leum

Nor

thbo

und

Petro

leum

Sout

hbou

nd1s

tEa

stbo

und

1st

Wes

tbou

ndSt

art T

ime

Left

Thru

Rig

htPe

dsA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htPe

dsA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htPe

dsA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htPe

dsA

pp. T

otal

Int.

Tota

l07

:00

AM

04

10

521

517

043

2819

11

490

00

00

9707

:15

AM

02

10

341

526

072

1934

10

540

00

00

129

07:3

0 A

M0

51

17

312

420

7522

231

450

00

00

013

207

:45

AM

23

11

737

1150

098

3535

12

730

00

00

178

Tota

l2

144

222

130

2313

50

288

104

111

47

226

00

00

053

6

08:0

0 A

M0

40

37

448

350

8730

350

166

00

00

016

008

:15

AM

15

02

823

434

162

2031

12

540

00

00

124

08:3

0 A

M0

50

05

4216

460

104

2819

02

490

00

00

158

08:4

5 A

M0

11

68

424

562

104

1928

02

490

00

44

165

Tota

l1

151

1128

151

3217

13

357

9711

31

721

80

00

44

607

***

BR

EAK

***

04:0

0 PM

23

01

665

1878

016

129

220

051

00

03

322

104

:15

PM1

61

311

7313

810

167

3132

13

670

00

00

245

04:3

0 PM

08

43

1573

1673

016

243

362

081

00

03

326

104

:45

PM0

60

28

7717

751

170

2341

02

660

00

11

245

Tota

l3

235

940

288

6430

71

660

126

131

35

265

00

07

797

2

05:0

0 PM

27

00

967

1170

014

844

374

287

00

00

024

405

:15

PM1

60

07

5914

900

163

3838

11

780

00

00

248

05:3

0 PM

05

00

567

1884

016

925

350

060

00

00

023

405

:45

PM0

31

04

649

550

128

2130

20

530

00

00

185

Tota

l3

211

025

257

5229

90

608

128

140

73

278

00

00

091

1

Gra

nd T

otal

973

1122

115

826

171

912

419

1345

549

515

2298

70

00

1111

3026

App

rch

%7.

863

.59.

619

.143

.28.

947

.70.

246

.150

.21.

52.

20

00

100

Tota

l %0.

32.

40.

40.

73.

827

.35.

730

.10.

163

.215

16.4

0.5

0.7

32.6

00

00.

40.

4Pa

ss. V

eh.

973

1122

115

775

169

886

418

3444

548

215

2196

30

00

99

2921

% P

ass.

Veh

.10

010

010

010

010

093

.898

.897

.110

095

.997

.897

.410

095

.597

.60

00

81.8

81.8

96.5

Truc

ks0

00

00

512

260

7910

120

022

00

00

010

1%

Tru

cks

00

00

06.

21.

22.

90

4.1

2.2

2.4

00

2.2

00

00

03.

3B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

01

01

20

00

22

4%

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

0.2

04.

50.

20

00

18.2

18.2

0.1

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Firs

t-Pet

role

umS

ite C

ode

: 000

0000

2S

tart

Dat

e: 7

/8/2

010

Pag

e N

o: 2

Petro

leum

Nor

thbo

und

Petro

leum

Sout

hbou

nd1s

tEa

stbo

und

1st

Wes

tbou

nd

Star

t Tim

eLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alIn

t. To

tal

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fro

m 0

7:00

AM

to 1

1:45

AM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n B

egin

s at 0

7:45

AM

07:4

5 A

M2

31

17

3711

500

9835

351

273

00

00

017

808

:00

AM

04

03

744

835

087

3035

01

660

00

00

160

08:1

5 A

M1

50

28

234

341

6220

311

254

00

00

012

408

:30

AM

05

00

542

1646

010

428

190

249

00

00

015

8To

tal V

olum

e3

171

627

146

3916

51

351

113

120

27

242

00

00

062

0%

App

. Tot

al11

.163

3.7

22.2

41.6

11.1

470.

346

.749

.60.

82.

90

00

0PH

F.3

75.8

50.2

50.5

00.8

44.8

30.6

09.8

25.2

50.8

44.8

07.8

57.5

00.8

75.8

29.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.8

71

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fro

m 1

2:00

PM

to 0

5:45

PM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n B

egin

s at 0

4:30

PM

04:3

0 PM

08

43

1573

1673

016

243

362

081

00

03

326

104

:45

PM0

60

28

7717

751

170

2341

02

660

00

11

245

05:0

0 PM

27

00

967

1170

014

844

374

287

00

00

024

405

:15

PM1

60

07

5914

900

163

3838

11

780

00

00

248

Tota

l Vol

ume

327

45

3927

658

308

164

314

815

27

531

20

00

44

998

% A

pp. T

otal

7.7

69.2

10.3

12.8

42.9

947

.90.

247

.448

.72.

21.

60

00

100

PHF

.375

.844

.250

.417

.650

.896

.853

.856

.250

.946

.841

.927

.438

.625

.897

.000

.000

.000

.333

.333

.956

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Firs

t-Cen

tral

Site

Cod

e: 0

0000

003

Sta

rt D

ate

: 7/8

/201

0P

age

No

: 1

Gro

ups

Prin

ted-

Pas

s. V

eh. -

Tru

cks

- Bik

esC

entra

lN

orth

boun

dC

entra

lS

outh

boun

d1s

tE

astb

ound

1st

Wes

tbou

ndS

tart

Tim

eLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Ped

sA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htP

eds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Ped

sA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htP

eds

App

. Tot

alIn

t. To

tal

07:0

0 A

M0

1310

023

16

01

82

401

043

00

01

175

07:1

5 A

M0

1211

023

46

00

103

703

177

00

00

011

007

:30

AM

015

131

292

70

09

147

22

520

00

11

9107

:45

AM

010

151

264

40

08

568

41

780

00

11

113

Tota

l0

5049

210

111

230

135

1122

510

425

00

00

33

389

08:0

0 A

M0

416

020

24

02

84

732

281

00

00

010

908

:15

AM

018

134

357

70

216

353

13

600

00

11

112

08:3

0 A

M0

812

222

313

01

175

484

158

00

00

097

08:4

5 A

M0

817

328

910

03

222

591

264

00

00

011

4To

tal

038

589

105

2134

08

6314

233

88

263

00

01

143

2

***

BR

EA

K *

**

04:0

0 P

M0

720

431

1319

01

335

836

498

00

02

216

404

:15

PM

013

154

3219

190

341

782

140

103

00

01

117

704

:30

PM

012

273

426

270

235

296

111

110

00

02

218

904

:45

PM

06

245

3513

200

235

510

316

012

40

00

11

195

Tota

l0

3886

1614

051

850

814

419

364

475

435

00

06

672

5

05:0

0 P

M0

932

647

1127

00

385

958

511

30

00

00

198

05:1

5 P

M0

1318

435

832

00

403

847

397

00

00

017

205

:30

PM

08

210

296

210

027

490

74

105

00

01

116

205

:45

PM

011

180

295

140

019

383

133

102

00

03

315

3To

tal

041

8910

140

3094

00

124

1535

235

1541

70

00

44

685

Gra

nd T

otal

016

728

237

486

113

236

017

366

5911

7410

032

1365

00

014

1422

31A

pprc

h %

034

.458

7.6

30.9

64.5

04.

64.

386

7.3

2.3

00

010

0To

tal %

07.

512

.61.

721

.85.

110

.60

0.8

16.4

2.6

52.6

4.5

1.4

61.2

00

00.

60.

6P

ass.

Veh

.0

167

282

3248

111

323

60

1636

559

1140

100

3213

310

00

1414

2191

% P

ass.

Veh

.0

100

100

86.5

9910

010

00

94.1

99.7

100

97.1

100

100

97.5

00

010

010

098

.2Tr

ucks

00

00

00

00

00

034

00

340

00

00

34%

Tru

cks

00

00

00

00

00

02.

90

02.

50

00

00

1.5

Bik

es0

00

55

00

01

10

00

00

00

00

06

% B

ikes

00

013

.51

00

05.

90.

30

00

00

00

00

00.

3

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Firs

t-Cen

tral

Site

Cod

e: 0

0000

003

Sta

rt D

ate

: 7/8

/201

0P

age

No

: 2

Cen

tral

Nor

thbo

und

Cen

tral

Sou

thbo

und

1st

Eas

tbou

nd1s

tW

estb

ound

Sta

rt Ti

me

Left

Thru

Rig

htP

eds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Ped

sA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htP

eds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Ped

sA

pp. T

otal

Int.

Tota

l

Pea

k H

our A

naly

sis

From

07:

00 A

M to

11:

45 A

M -

Pea

k 1

of 1

Pea

k H

our f

or E

ntire

Inte

rsec

tion

Beg

ins

at 0

8:00

AM

08:0

0 A

M0

416

020

24

02

84

732

281

00

00

010

908

:15

AM

018

134

357

70

216

353

13

600

00

11

112

08:3

0 A

M0

812

222

313

01

175

484

158

00

00

097

08:4

5 A

M0

817

328

910

03

222

591

264

00

00

011

4To

tal V

olum

e0

3858

910

521

340

863

1423

38

826

30

00

11

432

% A

pp. T

otal

036

.255

.28.

633

.354

012

.75.

388

.63

30

00

100

PH

F.0

00.5

28.8

53.5

63.7

50.5

83.6

54.0

00.6

67.7

16.7

00.7

98.5

00.6

67.8

12.0

00.0

00.0

00.2

50.2

50.9

47

Pea

k H

our A

naly

sis

From

12:

00 P

M to

05:

45 P

M -

Pea

k 1

of 1

Pea

k H

our f

or E

ntire

Inte

rsec

tion

Beg

ins

at 0

4:15

PM

04:1

5 P

M0

1315

432

1919

03

417

8214

010

30

00

11

177

04:3

0 P

M0

1227

342

627

02

352

9611

111

00

00

22

189

04:4

5 P

M0

624

535

1320

02

355

103

160

124

00

01

119

505

:00

PM

09

326

4711

270

038

595

85

113

00

00

019

8To

tal V

olum

e0

4098

1815

649

930

714

919

376

496

450

00

04

475

9%

App

. Tot

al0

25.6

62.8

11.5

32.9

62.4

04.

74.

283

.610

.91.

30

00

100

PH

F.0

00.7

69.7

66.7

50.8

30.6

45.8

61.0

00.5

83.9

09.6

79.9

13.7

66.3

00.9

07.0

00.0

00.0

00.5

00.5

00.9

58

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Firs

t-Sta

teS

ite C

ode

: 005

0000

2S

tart

Dat

e: 7

/8/2

010

Pag

e N

o: 1

Gro

ups

Prin

ted-

Pas

s. V

eh. -

Tru

cks

- Bik

esSt

ate

Nor

thbo

und

Stat

eSo

uthb

ound

1st

East

boun

d1s

tW

estb

ound

Sta

rt Ti

me

Left

Thru

Rig

htP

eds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Ped

sA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htP

eds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Ped

sA

pp. T

otal

Int.

Tota

l07

:00

AM

00

00

037

10

038

1631

10

480

00

00

8607

:15

AM

00

00

043

10

044

3255

31

910

00

22

137

07:3

0 A

M0

00

11

681

00

6923

400

467

00

01

113

807

:45

AM

00

01

169

10

070

3547

30

850

00

11

157

Tota

l0

00

22

217

40

022

110

617

37

529

10

00

44

518

08:0

0 A

M0

00

22

710

01

7225

662

194

00

00

016

808

:15

AM

00

01

155

50

262

3334

12

700

10

34

137

08:3

0 A

M0

00

11

625

01

6813

443

161

00

00

013

008

:45

AM

00

02

284

50

089

3054

30

870

00

33

181

Tota

l0

00

66

272

150

429

110

119

89

431

20

10

67

616

***

BR

EA

K *

**

04:0

0 P

M0

00

22

103

70

111

130

944

012

80

00

11

242

04:1

5 P

M0

00

00

101

110

011

231

816

011

80

00

00

230

04:3

0 P

M0

00

00

100

100

211

256

718

714

20

10

45

259

04:4

5 P

M0

00

00

998

00

107

4694

40

144

00

00

025

1To

tal

00

02

240

336

03

442

163

340

227

532

01

05

698

2

05:0

0 P

M0

00

22

109

120

112

245

944

314

60

00

00

270

05:1

5 P

M0

10

12

110

90

412

337

743

211

60

00

11

242

05:3

0 P

M0

00

33

825

04

9142

675

011

40

00

22

210

05:4

5 P

M0

10

01

775

01

8343

644

111

20

10

01

197

Tota

l0

20

68

378

310

1041

916

729

916

648

80

10

34

919

Gra

nd T

otal

02

016

1812

7086

017

1373

537

1010

5422

1623

03

018

2130

35A

pprc

h %

011

.10

88.9

92.5

6.3

01.

233

.162

.23.

31.

40

14.3

085

.7To

tal %

00.

10

0.5

0.6

41.8

2.8

00.

645

.217

.733

.31.

80.

753

.50

0.1

00.

60.

7P

ass.

Veh

.0

00

1616

1247

840

1513

4653

496

654

2115

750

00

1616

2953

% P

ass.

Veh

.0

00

100

88.9

98.2

97.7

088

.298

99.4

95.6

100

95.5

970

00

88.9

76.2

97.3

Truc

ks0

00

00

220

00

222

410

043

00

01

166

% T

ruck

s0

00

00

1.7

00

01.

60.

44.

10

02.

60

00

5.6

4.8

2.2

Bik

es0

20

02

12

02

51

30

15

03

01

416

% B

ikes

010

00

011

.10.

12.

30

11.8

0.4

0.2

0.3

04.

50.

30

100

05.

619

0.5

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Firs

t-Sta

teS

ite C

ode

: 005

0000

2S

tart

Dat

e: 7

/8/2

010

Pag

e N

o: 2

Stat

eN

orth

boun

dSt

ate

Sout

hbou

nd1s

tEa

stbo

und

1st

Wes

tbou

nd

Sta

rt Ti

me

Left

Thru

Rig

htP

eds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Ped

sA

pp. T

otal

Left

Thru

Rig

htP

eds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Ped

sA

pp. T

otal

Int.

Tota

l

Pea

k H

our A

naly

sis

From

07:

00 A

M to

11:

45 A

M -

Pea

k 1

of 1

Pea

k H

our f

or E

ntire

Inte

rsec

tion

Beg

ins

at 0

8:00

AM

08:0

0 A

M0

00

22

710

01

7225

662

194

00

00

016

808

:15

AM

00

01

155

50

262

3334

12

700

10

34

137

08:3

0 A

M0

00

11

625

01

6813

443

161

00

00

013

008

:45

AM

00

02

284

50

089

3054

30

870

00

33

181

Tota

l Vol

ume

00

06

627

215

04

291

101

198

94

312

01

06

761

6%

App

. Tot

al0

00

100

93.5

5.2

01.

432

.463

.52.

91.

30

14.3

085

.7P

HF

.000

.000

.000

.750

.750

.810

.750

.000

.500

.817

.765

.750

.750

.500

.830

.000

.250

.000

.500

.438

.851

Pea

k H

our A

naly

sis

From

12:

00 P

M to

05:

45 P

M -

Pea

k 1

of 1

Pea

k H

our f

or E

ntire

Inte

rsec

tion

Beg

ins

at 0

4:30

PM

04:3

0 P

M0

00

00

100

100

211

256

718

714

20

10

45

259

04:4

5 P

M0

00

00

998

00

107

4694

40

144

00

00

025

105

:00

PM

00

02

210

912

01

122

4594

43

146

00

00

027

005

:15

PM

01

01

211

09

04

123

3774

32

116

00

01

124

2To

tal V

olum

e0

10

34

418

390

746

418

433

319

1254

80

10

56

1022

% A

pp. T

otal

025

075

90.1

8.4

01.

533

.660

.83.

52.

20

16.7

083

.3P

HF

.000

.250

.000

.375

.500

.950

.813

.000

.438

.943

.821

.886

.594

.429

.938

.000

.250

.000

.313

.300

.946

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Firs

t-Wils

onS

ite C

ode

: 000

0000

7S

tart

Dat

e: 7

/8/2

010

Pag

e N

o: 1

Gro

ups P

rinte

d- C

ars -

Tru

cks -

Bik

esW

ilson

Nor

thbo

und

Wils

onSo

uthb

ound

1st

East

boun

d1s

tW

estb

ound

Star

t Tim

eLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alIn

t. To

tal

07:0

0 A

M0

191

020

00

00

00

4825

073

00

00

093

07:1

5 A

M0

273

030

00

00

01

7124

096

00

00

012

607

:30

AM

031

02

330

00

00

071

360

107

00

01

114

107

:45

AM

025

01

260

00

00

380

291

113

00

00

013

9To

tal

010

24

310

90

00

00

427

011

41

389

00

01

149

9

08:0

0 A

M0

375

042

00

00

01

100

392

142

00

00

018

408

:15

AM

028

01

290

00

00

362

211

870

00

00

116

08:3

0 A

M0

280

028

00

00

02

8128

011

10

00

00

139

08:4

5 A

M0

272

130

00

00

01

9143

013

50

00

00

165

Tota

l0

120

72

129

00

00

07

334

131

347

50

00

00

604

***

BR

EAK

***

04:0

0 PM

077

20

790

00

22

812

763

019

80

00

11

280

04:1

5 PM

053

00

530

00

00

311

661

018

00

00

00

233

04:3

0 PM

068

24

740

00

00

311

648

016

70

00

00

241

04:4

5 PM

063

25

700

00

33

213

158

019

10

00

11

265

Tota

l0

261

69

276

00

05

516

490

230

073

60

00

22

1019

05:0

0 PM

071

10

720

00

00

412

271

019

70

00

00

269

05:1

5 PM

057

11

590

00

22

311

167

218

30

00

00

244

05:3

0 PM

054

10

550

00

00

697

510

154

00

00

020

905

:45

PM0

641

570

00

00

04

7756

013

70

00

00

207

Tota

l0

246

46

256

00

02

217

407

245

267

10

00

00

929

Gra

nd T

otal

072

921

2077

00

00

77

4415

0172

06

2271

00

03

330

51A

pprc

h %

094

.72.

72.

60

00

100

1.9

66.1

31.7

0.3

00

010

0To

tal %

023

.90.

70.

725

.20

00

0.2

0.2

1.4

49.2

23.6

0.2

74.4

00

00.

10.

1C

ars

072

021

2076

10

00

77

4314

5270

66

2207

00

03

329

78%

Car

s0

98.8

100

100

98.8

00

010

010

097

.796

.798

.110

097

.20

00

100

100

97.6

Truc

ks0

90

09

00

00

01

4914

064

00

00

073

% T

ruck

s0

1.2

00

1.2

00

00

02.

33.

31.

90

2.8

00

00

02.

4B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0%

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Firs

t-Wils

onS

ite C

ode

: 000

0000

7S

tart

Dat

e: 7

/8/2

010

Pag

e N

o: 2

Wils

onN

orth

boun

dW

ilson

Sout

hbou

nd1s

tEa

stbo

und

1st

Wes

tbou

nd

Star

t Tim

eLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alIn

t. To

tal

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fro

m 0

7:00

AM

to 1

2:30

PM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n B

egin

s at 0

8:00

AM

08:0

0 A

M0

375

042

00

00

01

100

392

142

00

00

018

408

:15

AM

028

01

290

00

00

362

211

870

00

00

116

08:3

0 A

M0

280

028

00

00

02

8128

011

10

00

00

139

08:4

5 A

M0

272

130

00

00

01

9143

013

50

00

00

165

Tota

l Vol

ume

012

07

212

90

00

00

733

413

13

475

00

00

060

4%

App

. Tot

al0

935.

41.

60

00

01.

570

.327

.60.

60

00

0PH

F.0

00.8

11.3

50.5

00.7

68.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.5

83.8

35.7

62.3

75.8

36.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.8

21

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fro

m 1

2:45

PM

to 0

5:45

PM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n B

egin

s at 0

4:00

PM

04:0

0 PM

077

20

790

00

22

812

763

019

80

00

11

280

04:1

5 PM

053

00

530

00

00

311

661

018

00

00

00

233

04:3

0 PM

068

24

740

00

00

311

648

016

70

00

00

241

04:4

5 PM

063

25

700

00

33

213

158

019

10

00

11

265

Tota

l Vol

ume

026

16

927

60

00

55

1649

023

00

736

00

02

210

19%

App

. Tot

al0

94.6

2.2

3.3

00

010

02.

266

.631

.20

00

010

0PH

F.0

00.8

47.7

50.4

50.8

73.0

00.0

00.0

00.4

17.4

17.5

00.9

35.9

13.0

00.9

29.0

00.0

00.0

00.5

00.5

00.9

10

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Pum

phou

seS

ite C

ode

: 000

0000

8S

tart

Dat

e: 7

/8/2

010

Pag

e N

o: 1

Gro

ups P

rinte

d- P

ass.

Veh

. - T

ruck

s - B

ikes

Rou

te 6

2N

orth

boun

dR

oute

62

Sout

hbou

ndPa

rkin

g Lo

tEa

stbo

und

Pum

phou

seW

estb

ound

Star

t Tim

eLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alIn

t. To

tal

07:0

0 A

M0

680

068

056

00

560

00

00

00

10

112

507

:15

AM

087

00

870

640

064

00

00

01

00

01

152

07:3

0 A

M0

105

00

105

084

00

840

00

00

00

00

018

907

:45

AM

011

60

011

60

941

095

00

00

00

00

00

211

Tota

l0

376

00

376

029

81

029

90

00

00

10

10

267

7

08:0

0 A

M0

780

078

299

00

101

10

00

10

00

00

180

08:1

5 A

M0

730

073

081

00

810

00

00

00

00

015

408

:30

AM

077

00

770

840

084

00

00

00

01

01

162

08:4

5 A

M0

861

087

010

00

010

00

00

00

00

00

018

7To

tal

031

41

031

52

364

00

366

10

00

10

01

01

683

***

BR

EAK

***

04:0

0 PM

013

20

013

22

142

00

144

00

00

01

06

07

283

04:1

5 PM

012

60

012

63

119

00

122

00

00

00

03

03

251

04:3

0 PM

011

91

012

00

139

00

139

00

00

02

01

03

262

04:4

5 PM

013

60

013

63

131

00

134

00

00

01

00

01

271

Tota

l0

513

10

514

853

10

053

90

00

00

40

100

1410

67

05:0

0 PM

013

20

013

25

139

00

144

00

00

01

02

03

279

05:1

5 PM

014

90

014

91

130

00

131

00

00

01

02

03

283

05:3

0 PM

014

03

014

32

125

00

127

00

00

00

02

02

272

05:4

5 PM

012

01

012

11

115

00

116

00

00

00

00

00

237

Tota

l0

541

40

545

950

90

051

80

00

00

20

60

810

71

Gra

nd T

otal

017

446

017

5019

1702

10

1722

10

00

17

018

025

3498

App

rch

%0

99.7

0.3

01.

198

.80.

10

100

00

028

072

0To

tal %

049

.90.

20

500.

548

.70

049

.20

00

00

0.2

00.

50

0.7

Pass

. Veh

.0

1712

60

1718

1916

641

016

841

00

01

70

180

2534

28%

Pas

s. V

eh.

098

.210

00

98.2

100

97.8

100

097

.810

00

00

100

100

010

00

100

98Tr

ucks

032

00

320

380

038

00

00

00

00

00

70%

Tru

cks

01.

80

01.

80

2.2

00

2.2

00

00

00

00

00

2B

ikes

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0%

Bik

es0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

JOH

NSO

N, M

IRM

IRA

N &

TH

OM

PSO

N, I

NC

.15

50 C

orao

polis

Hei

ghts

Roa

d, S

uite

440

Moo

n To

wns

hip,

PA

151

08Fi

le N

ame

: Pum

phou

seS

ite C

ode

: 000

0000

8S

tart

Dat

e: 7

/8/2

010

Pag

e N

o: 2

Rou

te 6

2N

orth

boun

dR

oute

62

Sout

hbou

ndPa

rkin

g Lo

tEa

stbo

und

Pum

phou

seW

estb

ound

Star

t Tim

eLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Peds

App

. Tot

alIn

t. To

tal

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fro

m 0

7:00

AM

to 1

1:45

AM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n B

egin

s at 0

7:30

AM

07:3

0 A

M0

105

00

105

084

00

840

00

00

00

00

018

907

:45

AM

011

60

011

60

941

095

00

00

00

00

00

211

08:0

0 A

M0

780

078

299

00

101

10

00

10

00

00

180

08:1

5 A

M0

730

073

081

00

810

00

00

00

00

015

4To

tal V

olum

e0

372

00

372

235

81

036

11

00

01

00

00

073

4%

App

. Tot

al0

100

00

0.6

99.2

0.3

010

00

00

00

00

PHF

.000

.802

.000

.000

.802

.250

.904

.250

.000

.894

.250

.000

.000

.000

.250

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.870

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fro

m 1

2:00

PM

to 0

5:45

PM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n B

egin

s at 0

4:45

PM

04:4

5 PM

013

60

013

63

131

00

134

00

00

01

00

01

271

05:0

0 PM

013

20

013

25

139

00

144

00

00

01

02

03

279

05:1

5 PM

014

90

014

91

130

00

131

00

00

01

02

03

283

05:3

0 PM

014

03

014

32

125

00

127

00

00

00

02

02

272

Tota

l Vol

ume

055

73

056

011

525

00

536

00

00

03

06

09

1105

% A

pp. T

otal

099

.50.

50

2.1

97.9

00

00

00

33.3

066

.70

PHF

.000

.935

.250

.000

.940

.550

.944

.000

.000

.931

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.750

.000

.750

.000

.750

.976

Appendix C

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor Study Final Report October 2010

Appendix C: Future Traffic Projections

0.500%

*Growth Rate suggested by PennDOT

AM PM AM PM AM PMNBLNBT 186 202 187 203 207 224NBRSBLSBT 276 502 277 505 306 557SBREBL 33 32 33 32 37 36EBTEBR 11 7 11 7 12 8WBL 145 196 146 197 161 218WBTWBR 228 272 229 273 253 302TOTAL 879 1211 883 1217 976 1345

NBL 52 82 52 82 58 91NBTNBRSBLSBTSBREBLEBTEBRWBL 65 167 65 168 72 185WBT 326 388 328 390 362 431WBRTOTAL 443 637 445 640 492 707

NBLNBT 133 137 134 138 148 152NBRSBLSBT 289 415 290 417 321 461SBR 163 239 164 240 181 265EBLEBTEBRWBL 6 19 6 19 7 21WBT 235 309 236 311 261 343WBR 323 430 325 432 359 477TOTAL 1149 1549 1155 1557 1277 1719

NBL 159 285 160 286 177 316NBTNBRSBLSBTSBREBLEBTEBRWBLWBT 415 463 417 465 461 514WBRTOTAL 574 748 577 751 638 830

NBL 7 6 7 6 8 7NBT 24 34 24 34 27 38NBR 1 6 1 6 1 7SBL 141 318 142 320 157 353SBT 34 52 34 52 38 58SBR 257 341 258 343 285 379EBL 159 174 160 175 177 193EBT 153 151 154 152 170 168EBR 6 3 6 3 7 3WBLWBTWBRTOTAL 782 1085 786 1091 870 1206

NBLNBT 48 48 48 48 53 53NBR 87 87 87 87 97 97SBL 15 80 15 80 17 89SBT 49 82 49 82 54 91SBREBL 13 26 13 26 14 29EBT 275 395 276 397 305 439EBR 13 55 13 55 14 61WBLWBTWBRTOTAL 500 773 501 775 554 859

NBLNBTNBRSBL 284 383 285 385 315 425SBT 12 44 12 44 13 49SBREBL 138 142 139 143 153 158EBT 260 390 261 392 289 433EBR 7 23 7 23 8 26WBLWBTWBRTOTAL 701 982 704 987 778 1091

2030

4 - Front Street and Wilson Avenue

3 - Front Street and State Street

2 - Front Street and Central Avenue

2009 2010

Annual Growth Rate (Urban Non-Int.)* =

Route 62

Existing Year Year Year

Smart Transportation Study

5 - Petroleum Avenue and 1st Street

6 - 1st Street and Central Avenue

7 - 1st Street and State Street

1 - Petroleum Street and Front Street

0.500%

*Growth Rate suggested by PennDOT

AM PM AM PM AM PM20302009 2010

Annual Growth Rate (Urban Non-Int.)* =

Route 62

Existing Year Year Year

Smart Transportation Study

NBLNBT 147 257 148 258 163 285NBR 2 2 2 2 2 2SBLSBTSBREBL 12 28 12 28 13 31EBT 374 488 376 490 415 542EBR 150 265 151 266 167 294WBLWBTWBRTOTAL 685 1040 689 1044 760 1154

NBL 1 10 1 10 1 11NBT 404 427 406 429 449 474NBRSBLSBT 370 472 372 474 411 524SBR 6 13 6 13 7 14EBL 11 36 11 36 12 40EBTEBR 12 18 12 18 13 20WBLWBTWBRTOTAL 804 976 808 980 893 1083

NBL 48 89 48 89 53 99NBT 401 433 403 435 445 481NBRSBLSBT 382 484 384 486 424 537SBR 0 6 0 6 0 7EBL 4 4 4 4 4 4EBTEBR 48 82 48 82 53 91WBLWBTWBRTOTAL 883 1098 887 1102 979 1219

NBL 3 3 3 3 3 3NBT 44 57 44 57 49 63NBR 25 72 25 72 28 80SBL 103 229 104 230 114 254SBT 32 35 32 35 36 39SBR 5 2 5 2 6 2EBL 2 5 2 5 2 6EBT 0 1 0 1 0 1EBR 0 4 0 4 0 4WBL 23 82 23 82 26 91WBT 1 3 1 3 1 3WBR 99 191 99 192 110 212TOTAL 337 684 338 686 375 758

NBL 3 2 3 2 3 2NBT 0 1 0 1 0 1NBR 1 6 1 6 1 7SBL 3 18 3 18 3 20SBT 0 4 0 4 0 4SBR 24 42 24 42 27 47EBL 4 17 4 17 4 19EBT 120 271 121 272 133 301EBR 1 8 1 8 1 9WBL 0 4 0 4 0 4WBT 97 241 97 242 108 268WBR 3 8 3 8 3 9TOTAL 256 622 257 624 283 691

NBL 0 4 0 4 0 4NBT 69 140 69 141 77 155NBR 2 7 2 7 2 8SBL 5 12 5 12 6 13SBT 58 173 58 174 64 192SBR 1 16 1 16 1 18EBL 5 19 5 19 6 21EBT 6 6 6 6 7 7EBR 2 5 2 5 2 6WBL 0 6 0 6 0 7WBT 0 11 0 11 0 12WBR 9 40 9 40 10 44TOTAL 157 439 157 441 175 487

14 - 2nd Street and Imperial Street

10 - Front Street and Imperial Street

11 - Front Street and 2nd Street

12 - 2nd Street and Wilson Avenue

13 - 2nd Street and Pine Street

8 - 1st Street and Wilson Avenue

Appendix D

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor Study Final Report October 2010

Appendix D: Traffic Signal Inventory

���������

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 1: W. Front Street & Petroleum Street ������������ ����

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �$

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/%!�0 11 $$ $23 ��4 $45 ��5 �6 �7�8�/%!�!0 $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� 9�6 �/:0 1: 2: �1: :��"�(�-"�"�� �/-0 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; (� ��"�;�7�"�� $; $; $; $; $; $; 7�!<=�! 6><�? - $; ;�� $; $; $; $; 7!<=�! 6><�? - $; $; $; $; $; $; 7�" $; ;43 $; ;43 $; $; 7"����" �" 6 ;�3 $; ;�3 $; $; $; �"6;�7�8�/!��"0 $�21 $31� $�$3 $31� $4�� $4$ 7"�� ���"" 6 ;�3 $; ;�3 $; $; $; �"6;�7�8�/! ��0 $�21 $31� $�$3 $31� $4�� $4$ � ?���,��+�"��=��@7 ;�� ;�� ;�� ;4 ;4 ;4 ;4� ;4� ;4� ;4� ;4� ;4��6A;�7�8�/%!�0 2� $2 $4$ �43 � � 11� ������ 6,�"����/%!�0 � $2� (� �9��,!�7�8�/%!�0 2� � $4$ $15 � � 11� *��+;�� 6-;�/B>��0 � � � � � $*��+;�'�? -�/B>��0 $@ %��. ��� -�/:0 �: �: �: 1: 1: 1: 1: 1: 1: 3: 3: 3:�,�����! �,-"�� �,-"�� �,-"�� �,-"�����" �" 6���- - � 5� ���"" 6���- - 2 2 4 4��"," 6�9� �=�9�/-0 1$; 1$; 1$; 1$; �2; �2; &++ �"�% �9� �=���/-0 1$; 1$; 1$; 1$; �2; �2; ��"," 6��>*��"�� ;24 ;24 ;24 ;24 ;1� ;1�* ��� ���� �/-0 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; (� �9�!�*!�/%!�0 41$ �12 4$4 �11 5�$ 554%>-��"������" ;$$ � ;$�%>-��"���� �� ; � ; � ;$$ ; �%>���"�� ; 3 ; $ ;�� ;$� ;1 ;3 ���+����� �=�6$ �;$ 4;� �;� �;4 $2;5 $3;������ --����7�"�� $; $; ;44 ;3� $;44 $; ���� � �"�� �=�6� ;$ ; ;5 ;5 $; �;�� ��/-0 �;� �; �;1 5;$ �4;2 $4;5( % ��+�� �%�� � � � � * '�!!������ ��/-0 �;� �;2 �4;2 $4;5�!!�����(�� � � * '

��" �- �"�����,����@*���% �� �*��"���� � $3;$ @*��( % ��+�� �%�� '@*��.�,� �"��*!��"���"�� ;12��"," 6�*�� �( ��"��/-0� 53; �,���+��-"�"�� �/-0 $ ; ��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"��� � ;4: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� *���-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3�����*��"���(� �9��,!

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 2: W. Front Street & Central Avenue ������������ ����

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� ��

��% � �" &'� &'� )'( )'� �'( �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 53 1�5 3� �����*��"�� 7� 7� �"�!9�6 �2: $: �1:� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�� ;�� ;43 ;43 ;54 ;54@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 �5 142 �5 � 6 -"���- $ $(� �)�6"��/+"0 ; $�; )?�����! 6�/+">-0 2; 2; � �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0 14 145!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� $ 12� $%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� $ 12� $"*=�-��� �/-0 2;� 5;4 5;�"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 �;� 1;3 1;1! �E, , �+� �: �3 4� $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 $5 2 3�� $ 44

��� �"���=�(� �B )'�$ )'�� �'�$.�,� ���" � 2 �35 �5.�,� �( +" �5 �5.�,� �����" ��@ $5 2 $� 3��.�,� �"��*!��"� ; 3 ;$3 ;$1F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 2 $$*��"���� ��/-0 1; ; $$;�(� �(�� � '�!!������ ��/-0 $;1 $$;��!!�����(�� '

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� �;4��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 53; : �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � *���-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 3: E. Front Street & Veterans Memorial Bridge ������������ ����

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �1

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/%!�0 5 �13 1�1 $11 �4� $51�6 �7�8�/%!�!0 $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� (� �)�6"�� $� $� $� $ $$ $� $� $� $� $� $� $39�6 �/:0 �$: $: �$: ��:��"�(�-"�"�� �/-0 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; (� ��"�;�7�"�� $; $; $; $; $; $; 7�!<=�! 6><�? - $; $; ;�4 $; $; ;��7!<=�! 6><�? - $; $; $; $; $; $; 7�" $; $; ;43 $; $; ;437"����" �" 6 ;�3 $; $; $; $; $; �"6;�7�8�/!��"0 $5�� $��2 $3�� $�$ $�$� $�5�7"�� ���"" 6 ;�3 $; $; $; $; $; �"6;�7�8�/! ��0 $5�� $��2 $3�� $�$ $�$� $�5�� ?���,��+�"��=��@7 ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�1 ;�1 ;�1 ;�$ ;�$ ;�$ ;4� ;4� ;4��6A;�7�8�/%!�0 5 �31 12� $4� 1�3 $41������ 6,�"����/%!�0 $�$ $�$(� �9��,!�7�8�/%!�0 5 �31 $�5 $4� 1�3 5�*��+;�� 6-;�/B>��0 $ $ � 1 1 �@ %��. ��� -�/:0 �: �: �: 1: 1: 1: : : : : : :�,�����! � �� � �� � �����" �" 6���- - 4 � 5� ���"" 6���- - 4 4 5��"," 6�9� �=�9�/-0 11; 11; 11; ��; ��; ��; &++ �"�% �9� �=���/-0 11; 11; 11; ��; ��; ��; ��"," 6��>*��"�� ;3$ ;3$ ;3$ ;12 ;12 ;12* ��� ���� �/-0 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; (� �9�!�*!�/%!�0 4�5 � $ ��3 525 53 3��%>-��"������" � ;$2 ;$ � ;$�%>-��"���� �� ; ;$� ; 2%>���"�� ; $ ;�4 ;�1 ;�� ;3 ;$ ���+����� �=�6$ �;� �;� 4;� $3;4 $�;$ $2;������ --����7�"�� $; $; $; $; 3 $; $; ���� � �"�� �=�6� ; ;4 ;� $;$ �;� ;1� ��/-0 �;� $ ; �;5 $�;� $�;� $3;$( % ��+�� �%�� � � � ' ' '�!!������ ��/-0 ; �;� $�;� $4;$�!!�����(�� � � ' '

��" �- �"�����,����@*���% �� �*��"���� � $2;� @*��( % ��+�� �%�� '@*��.�,� �"��*!��"���"�� ;1���"," 6�*�� �( ��"��/-0� 53; �,���+��-"�"�� �/-0 $ ; ��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"��� 32;�: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3�����*��"���(� �9��,!

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 4: E. Front Street & Wilson Avenue ������������ ����

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �2

��% � �" &'� &'� )'( )'� �'( �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 2$3 $3� �����*��"�� 7� 7� �"�!9�6 : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�� ;�� ;�5 ;�5 ;�$ ;�$@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 325 ��2 � 6 -"���- $(� �)�6"��/+"0 $�; )?�����! 6�/+">-0 2; � �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0 143!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� $ ��2 $%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� $ ��2 $"*=�-��� �/-0 2;$ 5;� �; "*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 �;� 1;3 1;1! �E, , �+� �: $ 5� $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 $5$� 54� $ �3

��� �"���=�(� �B )'�$ )'�� �'�$ �'��.�,� ���" ��1 ��1 $$� $$�.�,� �( +" $$� $$�.�,� �����" ��@ $� $� 54� 54�.�,� �"��*!��"� ;$5 ;$5 ;$5 ;$5F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 $2 $2*��"���� ��/-0 ; ; $$;1 $$;1(� �(�� ' '�!!������ ��/-0 ; $$;1�!!�����(�� '

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� 1;1��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 23;5: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 5: W. 1st Street & Petroleum Street ������������ ����

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �3

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/%!�0 $3� $31 5 � �2 $ $2$ 12 �3��6 �7�8�/%!�!0 $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� (� �)�6"�� $ $ $� $1 $1 $� $� $2 $� $ $ $�9�6 �/:0 ��: 1: �3: �:��"�(�-"�"�� �/-0 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; (� ��"�;�7�"�� $; $; $; $; $; 7�!<=�! 6><�? - $; $; $; $; $; 7!<=�! 6><�? - ;�� $; $; $; $; 7�" $; ;�� $; $; ;4�7"����" �" 6 ;�3 $; ;�� ;�3 $; �"6;�7�8�/!��"0 $555 $�5� $�43 $5$ $2� 7"�� ���"" 6 ;�3 $; ;4� ;�3 $; �"6;�7�8�/! ��0 $555 $�5� $�4� $5$ $2� � ?���,��+�"��=��@7 ;45 ;45 ;45 ;�� ;�� ;�� ;3� ;3� ;3� ;�� ;�� ;���6A;�7�8�/%!�0 $43 $�4 � $� 2� � $41 22 112������ 6,�"����/%!�0 $�4 (� �9��,!�7�8�/%!�0 $43 $43 35 $41 �3 *��+;�� 6-;�/B>��0 3 $ $ 3 1 1@ %��. ��� -�/:0 $: $: $: �: �: �: 1: 1: 1: $: $: $:�,�����! � �� � �� ���"���" �" 6���- - 2 � $ 5� ���"" 6���- - 2 ���"," 6�9� �=�9�/-0 $3; $3; $3; � ; 2 ; &++ �"�% �9� �=���/-0 $3; $3; $3; � ; 2 ; ��"," 6��>*��"�� ;�1 ;�1 ;�1 ;1$ ;5�* ��� ���� �/-0 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; (� �9�!�*!�/%!�0 142 2 � 2$$ 2�3 � 3%>-��"������" ;$$ � ;$$ � ;$�%>-��"���� �� � ;$$ ; 1%>���"�� ;24 ;23 ;$2 ;1� ;�4���+����� �=�6$ �$;5 �$;3 $�;� $�;5 3;4����� --����7�"�� $; $; $; $;� 1;������ � �"�� �=�6� 2;1 1;5 ;� �; ;�� ��/-0 �3;� �3;$ � ;3 �1; $�;2( % ��+�� �%�� * * * * '�!!������ ��/-0 �3;3 ; � ;3 � ;5�!!�����(�� * � * *

��" �- �"�����,����@*���% �� �*��"���� � ��;2 @*��( % ��+�� �%�� *@*��.�,� �"��*!��"���"�� ;13��"," 6�*�� �( ��"��/-0� 53; �,���+��-"�"�� �/-0 $ ; ��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"��� 32;�: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3�����*��"���(� �9��,!

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 6: W. 1st Street & Central Avenue ������������ ����

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �5

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/%!�0 $1 ��3 $1 24 4� $3 2� �6 �7�8�/%!�!0 $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� (� �)�6"�� $� $ $� $� $� $� $� $1 $� $ $ $�9�6 �/:0 �1: $: : 1:��"�(�-"�"�� �/-0 3; 3; 3; 3; (� ��"�;�7�"�� ;�3 $; $; $; 7�!<=�! 6><�? - $; $; $; $; 7!<=�! 6><�? - $; $; $; $; 7�" ;�� ;�$ $; $; 7"����" �" 6 $; $; ;�3 $; �"6;�7�8�/!��"0 1$ � $��3 $353 $5247"�� ���"" 6 $; $; ;53 $; �"6;�7�8�/! ��0 1$ � $��3 $ 51 $524� ?���,��+�"��=��@7 ;4� ;4� ;4� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;4$ ;4$ ;4$ ;�5 ;�5 ;�5�6A;�7�8�/%!�0 $3 1$5 $3 3� $ � � 52 ������ 6,�"����/%!�0 2 �$ (� �9��,!�7�8�/%!�0 12� �3 � 52 *��+;�� 6-;�/B>��0 $ 3 3 $ � �@ %��. ��� -�/:0 �: �: �: �: �: �: $: $: $: 5: 5: 5:�,�����! � �� � �����" �" 6���- - 2 � 5� ���"" 6���- - 2 5��"," 6�9� �=�9�/-0 2 ;$ 4;5 4;5 4;5&++ �"�% �9� �=���/-0 2 ;$ 4;5 4;5 4;5��"," 6��>*��"�� ;54 ;$3 ;$3 ;$3* ��� ���� �/-0 3; 3; 3; 3; . ��� �&G" �-����/-0 1; 1; 1; 1; (� �9�!�*!�/%!�0 �$�� �5 $35 �2$%>-��"������" � ; 2 ; 2%>-��"���� �� ;$$ ; �%>���"�� ;$5 ;�� ;$1 ;�����+����� �=�6$ 1;1 ��;1 �$;4 ��;������ --����7�"�� $; $; $; $; ���� � �"�� �=�6� ;� ;5 ;2 ;5� ��/-0 1;3 ��;� ��;� ��;4( % ��+�� �%�� � * * *�!!������ ��/-0 1;3 ; ��;� ��;��!!�����(�� � � * *

��" �- �"�����,����@*���% �� �*��"���� � $$;5 @*��( % ��+�� �%�� '@*��.�,� �"��*!��"���"�� ;$4��"," 6�*�� �( ��"��/-0� 34;� �,���+��-"�"�� �/-0 $ ; ��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"��� 2�;3: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3�����*��"���(� �9��,!

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 7: E. 1st Street & State Street ������������ ����

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� ��

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/%!�0 $14 �5 � �42 $� �6 �7�8�/%!�!0 $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� (� �)�6"�� $� $1 $� $� $� $� $� $1 $� $� $2 $�9�6 �/:0 $: �$: �$: �1:��"�(�-"�"�� �/-0 3; 3; 3; (� ��"�;�7�"�� ;�3 $; $; 7�!<=�! 6><�? - $; $; $; 7!<=�! 6><�? - $; $; $; 7�" $; $; $; 7"����" �" 6 ;�4 ;�3 $; �"6;�7�8�/!��"0 135� $�21 $�3�7"�� ���"" 6 ;�4 ;�3 $; �"6;�7�8�/! ��0 135� $�21 $�3�� ?���,��+�"��=��@7 ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;4� ;4� ;4��6A;�7�8�/%!�0 $1� �51 � 1�5 $2 ������ 6,�"����/%!�0 � (� �9��,!�7�8�/%!�0 2 � 1�5 $2 *��+;�� 6-;�/B>��0 1 � � 1 � � � �@ %��. ��� -�/:0 �: �: �: �: �: �: �: �: �: 3: 3: 3:�,�����! � �� � �����" �" 6���- - 2 5� ���"" 6���- - 2 5��"," 6�9� �=�9�/-0 ��; 11; 11; &++ �"�% �9� �=���/-0 ��; 11; 11; ��"," 6��>*��"�� ;12 ;3$ ;3$* ��� ���� �/-0 3; 3; 3; (� �9�!�*!�/%!�0 $� 5 443 ��3%>-��"������" ; $%>-��"���� �� ;$$ � ;$�%>���"�� ;12 ;1� ; $���+����� �=�6$ $5;$ �;� �;������ --����7�"�� $; ; 4 ; ����� � �"�� �=�6� ;4 $;$ ; � ��/-0 $5;4 $;4 ;5( % ��+�� �%�� ' � ��!!������ ��/-0 $5;4 ; ; $;4�!!�����(�� ' � � �

��" �- �"�����,����@*���% �� �*��"���� � $ ; @*��( % ��+�� �%�� �@*��.�,� �"��*!��"���"�� ;15��"," 6�*�� �( ��"��/-0� 53; �,���+��-"�"�� �/-0 $ ; ��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"��� 32;�: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3�����*��"���(� �9��,!

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 8: E. 1st Street & Wilson Avenue ������������ ����

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �4

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 $� 1�2 $3 $2� � �����*��"�� 7� 7� �"�! �"�!9�6 : : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�5 ;�5 ;�5 ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;��@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 $� 1� $35 $5 � � 6 -"���- $ $ �(� �)�6"��/+"0 $�; ; $�; )?�����! 6�/+">-0 2; 2; 2; � �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0 13$!D=�!"����,�<��? 6 ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;��%*=����+��"����%�,� 324 2$4 2$� 1�1 2�4 3�1 $%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� 3$� 14� 14$ 135 253 32� $"*=�-��� �/-0 2;$ 2;$ �;$ 5;3 5;� �;$ 5;3 5;�"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 �;� �;� 1;3 2; 1;1 1;3 2; 1;1! �E, , �+� �: �� $ $ � $ $ $ $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 $5$� $ $2 33� 3�� 553 1�1 2�� $ 41

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ &'�� &'�1 �'�$ �'��.�,� ���" $� 1� $35 $ � 33.�,� �( +" $� .�,� �����" $35 ���@ $5$� $� $� 3�� 311.�,� �"��*!��"� ; $ ;�1 ; � ;� ;$ F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 $ $� �*��"���� ��/-0 �;� ; ; $1;3 $�;3(� �(�� � ' '�!!������ ��/-0 ;� $1;��!!�����(�� '

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� 1;$��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 2 ;1: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 10: Imperial Street & E. Front Street ������������ ����

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� ��

��% � �" &'( &'� �'( �'� �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 $$ $� $ 2 2 1� 5�����*��"�� �"�! 7� 7� 9�6 : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;52 ;52 ;4� ;4� ;45 ;45@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 $� $� $ 2�1 21 �� 6 -"���-(� �)�6"��/+"0)?�����! 6�/+">-0� �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� 541 �$� 21�%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� 541 �$� 21�"*=�-��� �/-0 5;4 5;� 2;�"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 1;3 1;1 �;�! �E, , �+� �: �5 �4 $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 14� ��� $$ 3

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ �'�$ �'�� �'�$ �'��.�,� ���" 15 $53 1�4 �4� $3 .�,� �( +" $� $ .�,� �����" $� ���@ 3�4 $$ 3 $� $� $� .�,� �"��*!��"� ; � ; ;$� ;$� ; �F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 3 *��"���� ��/-0 $�;1 ;$ ; ; ; (� �(�� ' ��!!������ ��/-0 $�;1 ; ; �!!�����(�� '

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� ;3��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� �$;�: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 11: E.2nd Street & E. Front Street ������������ ����

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �$

��% � �" &'( &'� �'( �'� �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 2 24 24 2 $ 14� �����*��"�� �"�! 7� 7� 9�6 �1: 1: �1:� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�1 ;�1 ;4$ ;4$ ;�� ;��@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 2 3� 3� 2�3 2$3 � 6 -"���-(� �)�6"��/+"0)?�����! 6�/+">-0� �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� $ �� 2$3 2$3%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� $ �� 2$3 2$3"*=�-��� �/-0 5;2 5;� 2;$"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 1;3 1;1 �;�! �E, , �+� �: �4 �� �3����!��"��/% �>�0 �21 51$ $$14

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ &'�� �'�$ �'�� �'�$ �'��.�,� ���" 2 3� 3� 2�3 2$3 .�,� �( +" 2 3� .�,� �����" 3� ��@ �21 51$ $$14 $� $� $� .�,� �"��*!��"� ; � ; 4 ; 3 ;�� ;�2 ; F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 $ � 2 *��"���� ��/-0 � ;$ $$;� 4;1 ; ; ; (� �(�� * ' ��!!������ ��/-0 $$;� ;� ; �!!�����(�� '

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� $;$��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 15;4: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 12: E.2nd Street & Wilson Avenue ������������ ����

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �$$

��% � �" )'( )'� �'� �'� �'( �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 �1 $ 2� �3 $ 1 1������*��"�� �"�! 7� 7� 9�6 : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;43 ;43 ;�4 ;�4 ;�5 ;�5@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 �� $$4 5 1� $15 2�� 6 -"���- 2 � �(� �)�6"��/+"0 $�; $�; $�; )?�����! 6�/+">-0 2; 2; 2; � �� �"�'��?� $����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� 1�� �$ �5%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� 1�� �$ �5"*=�-��� �/-0 5;2 5;� 2;$"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 1;3 1;1 �;�! �E, , �+� �: �3 44 �$����!��"��/% �>�0 351 �4� $2��

��� �"���=�(� �B )'�$ �'�$ �'�� �'�$.�,� ���" $23 5 1� $�4.�,� �( +" �� $15.�,� �����" $$4 1� ��@ 45� $� $� $2��.�,� �"��*!��"� ;$� ; 2 ; � ; �F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 $3 �*��"���� ��/-0 $ ; ; ; 5; (� �(�� ' ��!!������ ��/-0 $ ; ; 5; �!!�����(�� '

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� 5;$��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� ��;�: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 13: E.2nd Street & Pine Street ������������ ����

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �$�

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 2 $� $ �� 1 1 $ 1 �2�����*��"�� 7� 7� �"�! �"�!9�6 : : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;4� ;4� ;4� ;�1 ;�1 ;�1 $; $; $; ;�5 ;�5 ;�5@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 3 $14 $ $ 2 1 1 $ 1 �3� 6 -"���- $ $ � �(� �)�6"��/+"0 $�; $�; $�; $�; )?�����! 6�/+">-0 2; 2; 2; 2; � �� �"�'��?� $����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� $$3 $2$ �4� �52 $2� �51 �51 $$2%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� $$3 $2$ �4� �52 $2� �51 �51 $$2"*=�-��� �/-0 2;$ 2;$ �;$ 5;3 5;� �;$ 5;3 5;�"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 �;� �;� 1;3 2; 1;1 1;3 2; 1;1! �E, , �+� �: $ $ $ $ $ $ $ ������!��"��/% �>�0 $2�� $225 53 514 � � 541 51� �14

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ )'�$ �'�$ �'�$.�,� ���" $22 $ 4 2 �4.�,� �( +" 3 1 1.�,� �����" $ 1 $ �3��@ $2�� $225 � � $.�,� �"��*!��"� ; ; ; $ ; 1F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 �*��"���� ��/-0 ;1 ; $ ;� �;$(� �(�� � ' ��!!������ ��/-0 ;1 ; $ ;� �;$�!!�����(�� ' �

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� $;���" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� � ;�: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 14: Imperial Street & E.2nd Street ������������ ����

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �$1

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 3 5 � � 5� � 3 34 $�����*��"�� �"�! �"�! 7� 7� 9�6 : : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;25 ;25 ;25 ;�3 ;�3 ;�3 ;54 ;54 ;54 ;4� ;4� ;4�@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 $$ $1 2 $� $ $ 1 5 53 $� 6 -"���- $ � 2(� �)�6"��/+"0 $�; $�; $�; )?�����! 6�/+">-0 2; 2; 2; � �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� $�� $42 5� $�1 $41 $ � 5� $ 5%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� $�� $42 5� $�1 $41 $ � 5� $ 5"*=�-��� �/-0 �;$ 5;3 5;� �;$ 5;3 5;� 2;$ 2;$"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 1;3 2; 1;1 1;3 2; 1;1 �;� �;�! �E, , �+� �: �� �4 $ $ $ �� $ $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 �3 � � $ � �3� �$ �23 $31� $2�3

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ )'�$ �'�$ �'�$.�,� ���" �4 $� $ 2 ��.�,� �( +" $$ 5.�,� �����" 2 $� 1 $��@ �3� �23 $31� $2�3.�,� �"��*!��"� ; 2 ; $ ; ; F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 1 $ *��"���� ��/-0 �;� 4;� ; ;5(� �(�� � � ��!!������ ��/-0 �;� 4;� ; ;5�!!�����(�� � �

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� �; ��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� $�;$: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 19: E. 1st Street & E. Front Street ������������ ����

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �$2

��% � �" &'( &'� )'� )'� �&( �&�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 1�5 2$3 �����*��"�� 7� 7� �"�!9�6 : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;��@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 2 � 23$ � 6 -"���-(� �)�6"��/+"0)?�����! 6�/+">-0� �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0 5$4!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� 23$ � 2 %*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� 23$ � 2 "*=�-��� �/-0 2;$ 5;4 5;�"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 �;� 1;3 1;1! �E, , �+� �: $ $ $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 $$ 5 �53 $ 42

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ &'�� )'�$ )'��.�,� ���" � 2 � 2 ��5 ��5.�,� �( +" .�,� �����" ��5 ��5��@ $� $� $� $� .�,� �"��*!��"� ;$� ;$� ;$1 ;$1F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 *��"���� ��/-0 ; ; ; ; (� �(���!!������ ��/-0 ; ; �!!�����(��

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� ; ��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� $�;�: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 121: E. 2nd Alley & Wilson Avenue ������������ ����

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �$3

��% � �" &'( &'� �'( �'� �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 � 1 $21 $13 3�����*��"�� �"�! 7� 7� 9�6 : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;3 ;3 ;�4 ;�4 ;�5 ;�5@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 2 2 $41 $�4 �� 6 -"���- � �(� �)�6"��/+"0 $�; $�; )?�����! 6�/+">-0 2; 2; � �� �"�'��?� $����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� 1�� $41 $42%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� 1�� $41 $42"*=�-��� �/-0 5;2 5;� 2;$"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 1;3 1;1 �;�! �E, , �+� �: �� $ $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 5�� 451 $1��

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ �'�$ �'�$.�,� ���" 2 $4� $42.�,� �( +" 2 2 .�,� �����" ���@ 5�� $1�� $� .�,� �"��*!��"� ; $ ; ;$$F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 *��"���� ��/-0 $ ;4 ;� ; (� �(�� ' ��!!������ ��/-0 $ ;4 ;� ; �!!�����(�� '

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� ;���" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� � ;5: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 1: W. Front Street & Petroleum Street ������������ ����

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �$

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/%!�0 1� � $�5 ��� � � 3 � �6 �7�8�/%!�!0 $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� 9�6 �/:0 1: 2: �1: :��"�(�-"�"�� �/-0 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; (� ��"�;�7�"�� $; $; $; $; $; $; 7�!<=�! 6><�? - $; ;�� $; ;�� $; $; 7!<=�! 6><�? - ;�� $; $; $; $; $; 7�" $; ;43 $; ;43 $; $; 7"����" �" 6 ;�3 $; ;�3 $; $; $; �"6;�7�8�/!��"0 $�53 $35� $�2� $3�2 $� � $44$7"�� ���"" 6 ;�3 $; ;�3 $; $; $; �"6;�7�8�/! ��0 $�53 $35� $�2� $3�2 $� � $44$� ?���,��+�"��=��@7 ;4$ ;4$ ;4$ ;43 ;43 ;43 ;41 ;41 ;41 ;�� ;�� ;���6A;�7�8�/%!�0 2 � �1$ 1� �21 325 ������ 6,�"����/%!�0 3 $�4 (� �9��,!�7�8�/%!�0 2 2 �1$ $2� �21 325 *��+;�� 6-;�/B>��0 3 1 1 3 � 1 1 �@ %��. ��� -�/:0 : : : $: $: $: $: $: $: $: $: $:�,�����! �,-"�� �,-"�� �,-"�� �,-"�����" �" 6���- - � 5� ���"" 6���- - 2 2 4 4��"," 6�9� �=�9�/-0 2 ; 2 ; 2 ; 2 ; 2 ; 2 ; &++ �"�% �9� �=���/-0 2 ; 2 ; 2 ; 2 ; 2 ; 2 ; ��"," 6��>*��"�� ;22 ;22 ;22 ;22 ;22 ;22* ��� ���� �/-0 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; (� �9�!�*!�/%!�0 �42 5�5 ��5 5�� 424 415%>-��"������" ;$1 � ;��%>-��"���� �� ; � ; � ;$1 ; �%>���"�� ; 3 ; $ ;1 ;�$ ;�� ;53���+����� �=�6$ $2;� $1;� $5; $3;1 $3;� $�;5����� --����7�"�� $; $; ;4� ;23 ;54 $; ���� � �"�� �=�6� ;$ ; $; ;� ;4 2; � ��/-0 $2;1 $1;� $2;$ �;5 $$;3 �1;3( % ��+�� �%�� ' ' ' � ' *�!!������ ��/-0 $2;1 $ ;1 $$;3 �1;3�!!�����(�� ' ' ' *

��" �- �"�����,����@*���% �� �*��"���� � $3;� @*��( % ��+�� �%�� '@*��.�,� �"��*!��"���"�� ;24��"," 6�*�� �( ��"��/-0� � ; �,���+��-"�"�� �/-0 $ ; ��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"��� �$;�: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� 7���-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3�����*��"���(� �9��,!

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 2: W. Front Street & Central Avenue ������������ ����

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� ��

��% � �" &'� &'� )'( )'� �'( �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 $5� 144 4� �����*��"�� 7� 7� �"�!9�6 �2: $: �1:� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�� ;�� ;�$ ;�$ ;�� ;��@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 $42 2�5 $ 2 � 6 -"���- 1 $(� �)�6"��/+"0 ; $�; )?�����! 6�/+">-0 2; 2; � �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0 14 145!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� $ 342 $%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� $ 342 $"*=�-��� �/-0 2;$ 5;4 5;�"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 �;� 1;3 1;1! �E, , �+� �: 4� �2 $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 $5$� 1�� $ 44

��� �"���=�(� �B )'�$ )'�� �'�$.�,� ���" 1�5 �42 $ 2.�,� �( +" $42 $ 2.�,� �����" ��@ $5$� $� 1��.�,� �"��*!��"� ;$$ ;$� ;�5F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 $ �5*��"���� ��/-0 2;5 ; $�;1(� �(�� � *�!!������ ��/-0 �;3 $�;1�!!�����(�� *

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� 2;5��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� �4;3: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 3: E. Front Street & Veterans Memorial Bridge ������������ ����

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �1

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/%!�0 $� 1 � 21 $1� 2$3 �1��6 �7�8�/%!�!0 $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� (� �)�6"�� $� $� $� $ $$ $� $� $� $� $� $� $39�6 �/:0 �$: $: �$: ��:��"�(�-"�"�� �/-0 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; (� ��"�;�7�"�� $; $; $; $; $; $; 7�!<=�! 6><�? - $; $; $; $; $; ;�47!<=�! 6><�? - $; $; $; $; $; $; 7�" $; $; ;43 $; $; ;437"����" �" 6 ;�3 $; $; $; $; $; �"6;�7�8�/!��"0 $533 $4 � $3�$ $4�$ $� $�137"�� ���"" 6 ;�3 $; $; $; $; $; �"6;�7�8�/! ��0 $533 $4 � $3�$ $4�$ $� $�13� ?���,��+�"��=��@7 ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�3 ;�3 ;�3 ;�$ ;�$ ;�$ ;�3 ;�3 ;�3�6A;�7�8�/%!�0 � 1�3 231 $3$ 21� �3������� 6,�"����/%!�0 �3� $2 (� �9��,!�7�8�/%!�0 � 1�3 � $ $3$ 21� $$�*��+;�� 6-;�/B>��0 � � � �$ �$ �@ %��. ��� -�/:0 : : : $: $: $: $: $: $: $: $: $:�,�����! � �� � �� � �����" �" 6���- - 4 � 5� ���"" 6���- - 4 4 5��"," 6�9� �=�9�/-0 2 ; 2 ; 2 ; 2 ; 2 ; 2 ; &++ �"�% �9� �=���/-0 2 ; 2 ; 2 ; 2 ; 2 ; 2 ; ��"," 6��>*��"�� ;22 ;22 ;22 ;22 ;22 ;22* ��� ���� �/-0 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; (� �9�!�*!�/%!�0 �15 4 2 � � 42 422 ��$%>-��"������" � ;$4 ; 4 � ;�1%>-��"���� �� ; $ ;$1 ; 5%>���"�� ; 1 ;2 ;�4 ;$4 ;3� ;$3���+����� �=�6$ $2;$ $5;� $3;� $3;$ $4; $2;4����� --����7�"�� $; $; $; $;5 $; $; ���� � �"�� �=�6� ;$ $;3 $; ;2 �;1 ;2� ��/-0 $2;$ $4;2 $5;� �2;3 � ;1 $3;�( % ��+�� �%�� ' ' ' * * '�!!������ ��/-0 ; $�;3 �2;3 $4;3�!!�����(�� � ' * '

��" �- �"�����,����@*���% �� �*��"���� � $4;3 @*��( % ��+�� �%�� '@*��.�,� �"��*!��"���"�� ;25��"," 6�*�� �( ��"��/-0� � ; �,���+��-"�"�� �/-0 $ ; ��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"��� �3; : �*��( % ��+�� �%�� ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3�����*��"���(� �9��,!

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 4: E. Front Street & Wilson Avenue ������������ ����

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �2

��% � �" &'� &'� )'( )'� �'( �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 251 �43 �����*��"�� 7� 7� �"�!9�6 : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�� ;�� ;� ;� ;42 ;42@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 3$2 11� � 6 -"���-(� �)�6"��/+"0)?�����! 6�/+">-0� �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0 143!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� �3� %*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� �3� "*=�-��� �/-0 2;$ 5;4 5;�"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 �;� 1;3 1;1! �E, , �+� �: $ 3� $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 $5�� �$� $ 44

��� �"���=�(� �B )'�$ )'�� �'�$ �'��.�,� ���" �3� �3� $� $� .�,� �( +" $� $� .�,� �����" ��@ $� $� �$� �$�.�,� �"��*!��"� ;$3 ;$3 ;�2 ;�2F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 �1 �1*��"���� ��/-0 ; ; $$;5 $$;5(� �(�� ' '�!!������ ��/-0 ; $$;5�!!�����(�� '

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� 2;5��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 35;2: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � '���-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 5: W. 1st Street & Petroleum Street ������������ ����

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �3

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/%!�0 $�2 $3$ 1 5 12 5 1$4 3� 12$�6 �7�8�/%!�!0 $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� (� �)�6"�� $ $ $� $1 $1 $� $� $2 $� $ $ $�9�6 �/:0 ��: 1: �3: �:��"�(�-"�"�� �/-0 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; (� ��"�;�7�"�� $; $; $; $; $; 7�!<=�! 6><�? - $; $; $; $; $; 7!<=�! 6><�? - ;�5 $; $; $; $; 7�" $; $; ;�4 $; ;4�7"����" �" 6 ;�3 $; ;�� ;�3 $; �"6;�7�8�/!��"0 $5$� $�5� � $� $5$ $2�27"�� ���"" 6 ;�3 $; ;�� ;�3 $; �"6;�7�8�/! ��0 $5$� $�5� $4� $5$ $2�2� ?���,��+�"��=��@7 ;4 ;4 ;4 ;�� ;�� ;�� ;54 ;54 ;54 ;�2 ;�2 ;�2�6A;�7�8�/%!�0 �$4 $4� 2 � 3 � 114 33 151������ 6,�"����/%!�0 $2$ (� �9��,!�7�8�/%!�0 �$4 $�1 54 114 ��� *��+;�� 6-;�/B>��0 $1 1 1 $1 � �@ %��. ��� -�/:0 $: $: $: �: �: �: : : : $: $: $:�,�����! � �� � �� ���"���" �" 6���- - 2 � $ 5� ���"" 6���- - 2 ���"," 6�9� �=�9�/-0 �3; �3; $3; 13; 33; &++ �"�% �9� �=���/-0 �3; �3; $3; 13; 33; ��"," 6��>*��"�� ;�4 ;�4 ;$� ;1� ;5$* ��� ���� �/-0 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; (� �9�!�*!�/%!�0 23 2�$ 1$� 5�5 � $%>-��"������" ;$$ � ;�$ � ;$�%>-��"���� �� � ;$1 ; 2%>���"�� ;24 ;1� ;�� ;32 ;1$���+����� �=�6$ ��;$ �5;1 1�;2 �$;1 4;2����� --����7�"�� $; $; $; $;�1 2;������ � �"�� �=�6� 1;� �;2 $;5 �;4 ;4� ��/-0 1 ;4 �4;� 12; ��;$ 2�;5( % ��+�� �%�� * * * * ��!!������ ��/-0 ��;4 ; 12; 15;3�!!�����(�� * � * �

��" �- �"�����,����@*���% �� �*��"���� � 12;� @*��( % ��+�� �%�� *@*��.�,� �"��*!��"���"�� ;23��"," 6�*�� �( ��"��/-0� � ; �,���+��-"�"�� �/-0 $ ; ��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"��� �3; : �*��( % ��+�� �%�� ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3�����*��"���(� �9��,!

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 6: W. 1st Street & Central Avenue ������������ ����

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �5

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/%!�0 �5 1�3 33 24 41 4 4� �6 �7�8�/%!�!0 $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� (� �)�6"�� $� $ $� $� $� $� $� $1 $� $ $ $�9�6 �/:0 �1: $: : 1:��"�(�-"�"�� �/-0 3; 3; 3; 3; (� ��"�;�7�"�� ;�3 $; $; $; 7�!<=�! 6><�? - $; ;�4 $; $; 7!<=�! 6><�? - $; $; ;�� $; 7�" ;�4 ;�$ $; $; 7"����" �" 6 $; $; ;�3 $; �"6;�7�8�/!��"0 1��$ $�25 $5�� $���7"�� ���"" 6 $; $; ;5$ $; �"6;�7�8�/! ��0 1��$ $�25 $ 2� $���� ?���,��+�"��=��@7 ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;42 ;42 ;42 ;�� ;�� ;���6A;�7�8�/%!�0 �4 2�� 5 3� �� $ $ $ 2 ������ 6,�"����/%!�0 � 41 (� �9��,!�7�8�/%!�0 3$ �1 $ $ $ 2 *��+;�� 6-;�/B>��0 $2 � � $2 $1 $$ $$ $1@ %��. ��� -�/:0 �: �: �: �: �: �: $: $: $: $: $: $:�,�����! � �� � �����" �" 6���- - 2 � 5� ���"" 6���- - 2 5��"," 6�9� �=�9�/-0 3$;� $$;� $$;� $$;�&++ �"�% �9� �=���/-0 3$;� $$;� $$;� $$;���"," 6��>*��"�� ;� ;$5 ;$5 ;$5* ��� ���� �/-0 3; 3; 3; 3; . ��� �&G" �-����/-0 1; 1; 1; 1; (� �9�!�*!�/%!�0 ���$ �42 $� �4$%>-��"������" ; 2 ; 5%>-��"���� �� ;$5 � ;$ %>���"�� ;�� ;�5 ;3� ;1����+����� �=�6$ 1;� �5;� �4;2 ��;1����� --����7�"�� $; $; $; $; ���� � �"�� �=�6� ;� ;3 3;3 ;4� ��/-0 2;$ ��;� 11;4 �4;$( % ��+�� �%�� � * * *�!!������ ��/-0 2;$ ; ��;� 1 ;��!!�����(�� � � * *

��" �- �"�����,����@*���% �� �*��"���� � $2;3 @*��( % ��+�� �%�� '@*��.�,� �"��*!��"���"�� ;����"," 6�*�� �( ��"��/-0� �1;$ �,���+��-"�"�� �/-0 $ ; ��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"��� 51; : �*��( % ��+�� �%�� '���-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3�����*��"���(� �9��,!

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 7: E. 1st Street & State Street ������������ ����

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� ��

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/%!�0 $2� 1� �1 141 22 �6 �7�8�/%!�!0 $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� (� �)�6"�� $� $1 $� $� $� $� $� $1 $� $� $2 $�9�6 �/:0 $: �$: �$: �1:��"�(�-"�"�� �/-0 3; 3; 3; (� ��"�;�7�"�� ;�3 $; $; 7�!<=�! 6><�? - $; $; $; 7!<=�! 6><�? - $; ;�� $; 7�" ;�� $; $; 7"����" �" 6 ;�� ;�3 $; �"6;�7�8�/!��"0 13�3 $��1 � 1�7"�� ���"" 6 ;�� ;�3 $; �"6;�7�8�/! ��0 13�3 $��1 � 1�� ?���,��+�"��=��@7 ;�1 ;�1 ;�1 ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�5 ;�5 ;�5�6A;�7�8�/%!�0 $31 2$� �3 1�� 25 ������ 6,�"����/%!�0 1 (� �9��,!�7�8�/%!�0 3�2 1�� 25 *��+;�� 6-;�/B>��0 2 5 5 2 $� $1 $2 $�*��+;�'�? -�/B>��0 $@ %��. ��� -�/:0 $: $: $: �: �: �: �: �: �: $: $: $:�,�����! � �� � �����" �" 6���- - 2 5� ���"" 6���- - 2 5��"," 6�9� �=�9�/-0 11; 2�; 2�; &++ �"�% �9� �=���/-0 11; 2�; 2�; ��"," 6��>*��"�� ;1� ;3� ;3�* ��� ���� �/-0 3; 3; 3; (� �9�!�*!�/%!�0 $1$4 �15 $ 52%>-��"������" ; �%>-��"���� �� ;$� � ;��%>���"�� ;23 ;21 ; 2���+����� �=�6$ �$;5 $1;� $ ;3����� --����7�"�� $; ;$ ;$2���� � �"�� �=�6� $;$ $;1 ;$� ��/-0 ��;� �;5 $;3( % ��+�� �%�� * � ��!!������ ��/-0 ��;� ; ; �;3�!!�����(�� * � � �

��" �- �"�����,����@*���% �� �*��"���� � $2;$ @*��( % ��+�� �%�� '@*��.�,� �"��*!��"���"�� ;22��"," 6�*�� �( ��"��/-0� � ; �,���+��-"�"�� �/-0 $ ; ��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"��� �3; : �*��( % ��+�� �%�� ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3�����*��"���(� �9��,!

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 8: E. 1st Street & Wilson Avenue ������������ ����

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �4

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 �4 244 �53 �3� � �����*��"�� 7� 7� �"�! �"�!9�6 : : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�3 ;�3 ;�3 ;�� ;�� ;�� ;4$ ;4$ ;4$ ;�� ;�� ;��@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 �� 3$2 ��� 1$� � � 6 -"���- 3 2 2(� �)�6"��/+"0 $�; ; $�; )?�����! 6�/+">-0 2; 2; 2; � �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0 13$!D=�!"����,�<��? 6 ;43 ;43 ;43 ;43 ;43 ;43%*=����+��"����%�,� ��� 34� 3�� 3�� �14 435 3%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� 5�$ 2$� 2$$ 125 5 $ �2 3"*=�-��� �/-0 2;$ 2;$ �;$ 5;3 5;� �;$ 5;3 5;�"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 �;� �;� 1;3 2; 1;1 1;3 2; 1;1! �E, , �+� �: �4 $ $ �4 $ $ $ $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 $51 ��� 232 22� 3�$ $21 �45 $ �2

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ &'�� &'�1 �'�$ �'��.�,� ���" �� 3$2 ��� �$� $ 4.�,� �( +" �� .�,� �����" ��� ���@ $51 $� $� 22� 222.�,� �"��*!��"� ; � ;1 ;$5 ;24 ;�2F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 $ 51 �2*��"���� ��/-0 �;� ; ; � ;2 $3;�(� �(�� � * *�!!������ ��/-0 ;1 $4;4�!!�����(�� *

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� 3;3��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 3$;$: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 10: Imperial Street & E. Front Street ������������ ����

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� ��

��% � �" &'( &'� �'( �'� �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 15 $4 $ 2�� 2�� $1�����*��"�� �"�! 7� 7� 9�6 : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�$ ;�$ ;44 ;44 ;�1 ;�1@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 3$ �3 $$ 243 3 4 $2� 6 -"���-(� �)�6"��/+"0)?�����! 6�/+">-0� �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� �4 �5$ 3��%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� �4 �5$ 3��"*=�-��� �/-0 5;4 5;� 2;$"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 1;3 1;1 �;�! �E, , �+� �: 43 �� ������!��"��/% �>�0 111 �22 $ 2$

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ �'�$ �'�� �'�$ �'��.�,� ���" �5 $�1 1�1 114 $41.�,� �( +" 3$ $$ .�,� �����" �3 $2��@ 2 4 $ 2$ $� $� $� .�,� �"��*!��"� ;$� ; $ ;$� ;� ;$$F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 $� $ *��"���� ��/-0 $3;4 ;� ; ; ; (� �(�� * ��!!������ ��/-0 $3;4 ;� ; �!!�����(�� *

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� $;���" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� ��; : �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 11: E.2nd Street & E. Front Street ������������ ����

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �$

��% � �" &'( &'� �'( �'� �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 2 4� 4� 211 242 5�����*��"�� �"�! 7� 7� 9�6 �1: 1: �1:� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;5� ;5� ;�� ;�� ;4� ;4�@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 5 $$� �� 2�$ 335 �� 6 -"���-(� �)�6"��/+"0)?�����! 6�/+">-0� �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� $�� 335 351%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� $�� 335 351"*=�-��� �/-0 5;2 5;� 2;$"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 1;3 1;1 �;�! �E, , �+� �: �� �4 � ����!��"��/% �>�0 $4� 312 $ $1

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ &'�� �'�$ �'�� �'�$ �'��.�,� ���" 5 $$� �� 2�$ 335 �.�,� �( +" 5 �� .�,� �����" $$� ���@ $4� 312 $ $1 $� $� $� .�,� �"��*!��"� ; 1 ;�� ;$ ;�4 ;11 ; F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 � �$ 4 *��"���� ��/-0 �3;2 $1;� 4;� ; ; ; (� �(�� � ' ��!!������ ��/-0 $2;� $;3 ; �!!�����(�� '

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� �;$��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 21;�: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 12: E.2nd Street & Wilson Avenue ������������ ����

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �$$

��% � �" )'( )'� �'� �'� �'( �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 4� $�2 5 �� ��� 2 �����*��"�� �"�! 7� 7� 9�6 : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�1 ;�1 ;�2 ;�2 ;� ;� @�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 44 � � 52 �� �32 22� 6 -"���- 3 $�(� �)�6"��/+"0 $�; $�; )?�����! 6�/+">-0 2; 2; � �� �"�'��?� $����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� 5�� 45 $23%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� 5�� 45 $23"*=�-��� �/-0 5;2 5;� 2;$"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 1;3 1;1 �;�! �E, , �+� �: �5 �4 4�����!��"��/% �>�0 1�� �5$ $221

��� �"���=�(� �B )'�$ �'�$ �'�� �'�$.�,� ���" ��� 52 �� ���.�,� �( +" 44 �32.�,� �����" � � �� ��@ 531 $� $� $221.�,� �"��*!��"� ;23 ; 2 ; 3 ;$4F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 3� $5*��"���� ��/-0 $3; ; ; �;$(� �(�� * ��!!������ ��/-0 $3; ; �;$�!!�����(�� *

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� 4;���" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 23;4: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 13: E.2nd Street & Pine Street ������������ ����

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �$�

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 $� ��$ 4 2 �2$ 4 � $ 5 $4 2 2������*��"�� 7� 7� �"�! �"�!9�6 : : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;4� ;4� ;4� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�3 ;�3 ;�3 ;4 ;4 ;4 @�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 $� 1 2 � 2 �21 4 1 $ 4 �� 3 3�� 6 -"���- 1 3 12(� �)�6"��/+"0 $�; $�; $�; )?�����! 6�/+">-0 2; 2; 2; � �� �"�'��?� 1����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� �45 1$4 555 525 1$2 523 525 �42%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� �45 1$4 555 525 1$2 523 525 �42"*=�-��� �/-0 2;$ 2;$ �;$ 5;3 5;� �;$ 5;3 5;�"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 �;� �;� 1;3 2; 1;1 1;3 2; 1;1! �E, , �+� �: �4 $ �� $ �� �2 �� �1����!��"��/% �>�0 $�3� $�24 11 1�1 ��4 13� 1�1 �15

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ )'�$ �'�$ �'�$.�,� ���" 111 �35 $� 4 .�,� �( +" $� 2 1 ��.�,� �����" � 4 4 3���@ $�3� $�24 31 32�.�,� �"��*!��"� ; � ; ; � ;$3F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 $ � $1*��"���� ��/-0 ;5 ;� $$;� $�;4(� �(�� � � ' '�!!������ ��/-0 ;5 ;� $$;� $�;4�!!�����(�� ' '

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� �;$��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 1�;5: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 14: Imperial Street & E.2nd Street ������������ ����

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �$1

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 $� 5 3 5 $$ 2 2 $2 � $� $�1 $5�����*��"�� �"�! �"�! 7� 7� 9�6 : : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�3 ;�3 ;�3 ;�3 ;�3 ;�3 ;55 ;55 ;55 ;�� ;�� ;��@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 �3 4 � 4 $3 31 5 �$� $$ $� $�4 $5� 6 -"���- $ 2 1(� �)�6"��/+"0 $�; $�; $�; )?�����! 6�/+">-0 2; 2; 2; � �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� 3 5 22� $�� 235 23 �� $�5 ��1%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� 3 5 22� $�� 235 23 �� $�5 ��1"*=�-��� �/-0 �;$ 5;3 5;� �;$ 5;3 5;� 2;$ 2;$"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 1;3 2; 1;1 1;3 2; 1;1 �;� �;�! �E, , �+� �: �2 �4 �� �4 �� �2 $ ������!��"��/% �>�0 211 3 � 43� 3 $ 3 4�� $144 $134

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ )'�$ �'�$ �'�$.�,� ���" 2 �5 ��� � �.�,� �( +" �3 4 5 $�.�,� �����" � 31 $$ $5��@ 245 5� $144 $134.�,� �"��*!��"� ; 4 ;$$ ; ; $F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 � � $*��"���� ��/-0 $1;$ $ ;� ;� ;3(� �(�� ' ' � ��!!������ ��/-0 $1;$ $ ;� ;� ;3�!!�����(�� ' '

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� �;���" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� ��;�: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 19: E. 1st Street & E. Front Street ������������ ����

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �$2

��% � �" &'( &'� )'� )'� �&( �&�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 1�5 2$3 �����*��"�� 7� 7� �"�!9�6 : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;��@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 2 � 23$ � 6 -"���-(� �)�6"��/+"0)?�����! 6�/+">-0� �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0 5$4!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� 23$ � 2 %*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� 23$ � 2 "*=�-��� �/-0 2;$ 5;4 5;�"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 �;� 1;3 1;1! �E, , �+� �: $ $ $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 $$ 5 �53 $ 42

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ &'�� )'�$ )'��.�,� ���" � 2 � 2 ��5 ��5.�,� �( +" .�,� �����" ��5 ��5��@ $� $� $� $� .�,� �"��*!��"� ;$� ;$� ;$1 ;$1F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 *��"���� ��/-0 ; ; ; ; (� �(���!!������ ��/-0 ; ; �!!�����(��

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� ; ��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� $�;�: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 121: E. 2nd Alley & Wilson Avenue ������������ ����

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �$3

��% � �" &'( &'� �'( �'� �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 3 3 1 �24 �52 ������*��"�� �"�! 7� 7� 9�6 : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;51 ;51 ;�2 ;�2 ;� ;� @�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 4 4 1 �52 ��1 �� 6 -"���- 1 $�(� �)�6"��/+"0 $�; $�; )?�����! 6�/+">-0 2; 2; � �� �"�'��?� $����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� 343 ��� ���%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� 343 ��� ���"*=�-��� �/-0 5;2 5;� 2;$"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 1;3 1;1 �;�! �E, , �+� �: �4 �� $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 254 �23 $��$

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ �'�$ �'�$.�,� ���" $5 �5� ��5.�,� �( +" 4 1 .�,� �����" 4 ���@ 3�3 $��$ $� .�,� �"��*!��"� ; 1 ; ;$�F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 � *��"���� ��/-0 $$;2 ;$ ; (� �(�� ' ��!!������ ��/-0 $$;2 ;$ ; �!!�����(�� '

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� ;2��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� �3;2: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

������� ��������

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 1: W. Front Street & Petroleum Street ������������ 1 ���

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �$

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/%!�0 11 $$ $23 ��4 $45 ��5 �6 �7�8�/%!�!0 $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� 9�6 �/:0 1: 2: �1: :��"�(�-"�"�� �/-0 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; (� ��"�;�7�"�� $; $; $; $; $; $; 7�!<=�! 6><�? - $; ;�� $; $; $; $; 7!<=�! 6><�? - $; $; $; $; $; $; 7�" $; ;43 $; ;43 $; $; 7"����" �" 6 ;�3 $; ;�3 $; $; $; �"6;�7�8�/!��"0 $�21 $31� $�$3 $31� $4�� $4$ 7"�� ���"" 6 ;�3 $; ;�3 $; $; $; �"6;�7�8�/! ��0 $�21 $31� $�$3 $31� $4�� $4$ � ?���,��+�"��=��@7 ;�� ;�� ;�� ;4 ;4 ;4 ;4� ;4� ;4� ;4� ;4� ;4�9��8"��7�"���/%!�0 $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$:�6A;�7�8�/%!�0 25 $3 � $ 1$5 �1� 1�2 ������ 6,�"����/%!�0 4 $53 (� �9��,!�7�8�/%!�0 25 � � $ $3$ �1� 1�2 *��+;�� 6-;�/B>��0 � � � � � $*��+;�'�? -�/B>��0 $@ %��. ��� -�/:0 �: �: �: 1: 1: 1: 1: 1: 1: 3: 3: 3:�,�����! �,-"�� �,-"�� �,-"�� �,-"�����" �" 6���- - � 5� ���"" 6���- - 2 2 4 4��"," 6�9� �=�9�/-0 1$; 1$; 1$; 1$; �2; �2; &++ �"�% �9� �=���/-0 1$; 1$; 1$; 1$; �2; �2; ��"," 6��>*��"�� ;24 ;24 ;24 ;24 ;1� ;1�* ��� ���� �/-0 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; (� �9�!�*!�/%!�0 41$ �12 4$4 �11 5�$ 554%>-��"������" ;$� � ;�$%>-��"���� �� ; 1 ; � ;$� ;$ %>���"�� ; 5 ; $ ;�3 ;�$ ;12 ;35���+����� �=�6$ �;$ 4;� $ ;$ �;� $2;4 $5;1����� --����7�"�� $; $; ;44 ;35 $;43 $; ���� � �"�� �=�6� ;$ ; ;� ;5 $;� 1;2� ��/-0 �;1 �; �;3 5;$ �4;3 $�;�( % ��+�� �%�� � � � � * '�!!������ ��/-0 �;� �;3 �4;3 $�;��!!�����(�� � � * '

��" �- �"�����,����@*���% �� �*��"���� � $3;3 @*��( % ��+�� �%�� '@*��.�,� �"��*!��"���"�� ;14��"," 6�*�� �( ��"��/-0� 53; �,���+��-"�"�� �/-0 $ ; ��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"��� � ;4: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� *���-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3�����*��"���(� �9��,!

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 2: W. Front Street & Central Avenue ������������ 1 ���

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� ��

��% � �" &'� &'� )'( )'� �'( �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 53 1�5 3� �����*��"�� 7� 7� �"�!9�6 �2: $: �1:� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�� ;�� ;43 ;43 ;54 ;54@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 43 2�5 43 � 6 -"���- $ $(� �)�6"��/+"0 ; $�; )?�����! 6�/+">-0 2; 2; � �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0 14 145!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� $ 143 $%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� $ 143 $"*=�-��� �/-0 2;� 5;4 5;�"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 �;� 1;3 1;1! �E, , �+� �: �3 43 $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 $5 2 353 $ 44

��� �"���=�(� �B )'�$ )'�� �'�$.�,� ���" ��� �42 43.�,� �( +" 43 43.�,� �����" ��@ $5 2 $� 353.�,� �"��*!��"� ; 3 ;$� ;$3F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 2 $1*��"���� ��/-0 1; ; $�;3(� �(�� � '�!!������ ��/-0 $;1 $�;3�!!�����(�� '

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� �;���" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 53;�: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � *���-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 3: E. Front Street & Veterans Memorial Bridge ������������ 1 ���

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �1

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/%!�0 5 �13 1�1 $11 �4� $51�6 �7�8�/%!�!0 $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� (� �)�6"�� $� $� $� $ $$ $� $� $� $� $� $� $39�6 �/:0 �$: $: �$: ��:��"�(�-"�"�� �/-0 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; (� ��"�;�7�"�� $; $; $; $; $; $; 7�!<=�! 6><�? - $; $; ;�4 $; $; ;��7!<=�! 6><�? - $; $; $; $; $; $; 7�" $; $; ;43 $; $; ;437"����" �" 6 ;�3 $; $; $; $; $; �"6;�7�8�/!��"0 $5�� $��2 $3�� $�$ $�$� $�5�7"�� ���"" 6 ;�3 $; $; $; $; $; �"6;�7�8�/! ��0 $5�� $��2 $3�� $�$ $�$� $�5�� ?���,��+�"��=��@7 ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�1 ;�1 ;�1 ;�$ ;�$ ;�$ ;4� ;4� ;4�9��8"��7�"���/%!�0 $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$:�6A;�7�8�/%!�0 � �4 145 � 4 15 � 1������ 6,�"����/%!�0 $� $12(� �9��,!�7�8�/%!�0 � �4 $�5 � 4 15 5�*��+;�� 6-;�/B>��0 $ $ � 1 1 �@ %��. ��� -�/:0 �: �: �: 1: 1: 1: : : : : : :�,�����! � �� � �� � �����" �" 6���- - 4 � 5� ���"" 6���- - 4 4 5��"," 6�9� �=�9�/-0 11; 11; 11; ��; ��; ��; &++ �"�% �9� �=���/-0 11; 11; 11; ��; ��; ��; ��"," 6��>*��"�� ;3$ ;3$ ;3$ ;12 ;12 ;12* ��� ���� �/-0 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; (� �9�!�*!�/%!�0 4�5 � $ ��3 525 53 3��%>-��"������" � ;$5 ;$$ � ;$�%>-��"���� �� ; ;$1 ; 2%>���"�� ; $ ;1$ ;�3 ;1� ;33 ;$$���+����� �=�6$ �;� �;2 �; $5; $�;3 $2;4����� --����7�"�� $; $; $; $; 3 $; $; ���� � �"�� �=�6� ; ;� ;4 $;1 1;2 ;2� ��/-0 �;� $ ;1 �;4 $4; � ;� $3;�( % ��+�� �%�� � ' � ' * '�!!������ ��/-0 ; $ ; $4; $4;4�!!�����(�� � � ' '

��" �- �"�����,����@*���% �� �*��"���� � $2;5 @*��( % ��+�� �%�� '@*��.�,� �"��*!��"���"�� ;2$��"," 6�*�� �( ��"��/-0� 53; �,���+��-"�"�� �/-0 $ ; ��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"��� 52; : �*��( % ��+�� �%�� *���-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3�����*��"���(� �9��,!

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 4: E. Front Street & Wilson Avenue ������������ 1 ���

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �2

��% � �" &'� &'� )'( )'� �'( �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 2$3 $3� �����*��"�� 7� 7� �"�!9�6 : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�� ;�� ;�5 ;�5 ;�$ ;�$@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 5 5 �2� � 6 -"���- $(� �)�6"��/+"0 $�; )?�����! 6�/+">-0 2; � �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0 143!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� $ 1 2 $%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� $ 1 2 $"*=�-��� �/-0 2;$ 5;� �; "*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 �;� 1;3 1;1! �E, , �+� �: $ 5� $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 $5$� 53� $ �3

��� �"���=�(� �B )'�$ )'�� �'�$ �'��.�,� ���" 1 1 1 1 $�2 $�2.�,� �( +" $�2 $�2.�,� �����" ��@ $� $� 53� 53�.�,� �"��*!��"� ;$4 ;$4 ;$� ;$�F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 $� $�*��"���� ��/-0 ; ; $$;� $$;�(� �(�� ' '�!!������ ��/-0 ; $$;��!!�����(�� '

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� 1;2��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 2�;3: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 5: W. 1st Street & Petroleum Street ������������ 1 ���

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �3

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/%!�0 $3� $31 5 � �2 $ $2$ 12 �3��6 �7�8�/%!�!0 $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� (� �)�6"�� $ $ $� $1 $1 $� $� $2 $� $ $ $�9�6 �/:0 ��: 1: �3: �:��"�(�-"�"�� �/-0 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; (� ��"�;�7�"�� $; $; $; $; $; 7�!<=�! 6><�? - $; $; $; $; $; 7!<=�! 6><�? - ;�� $; $; $; $; 7�" $; ;�� $; $; ;4�7"����" �" 6 ;�3 $; ;�� ;�3 $; �"6;�7�8�/!��"0 $555 $�5$ $�43 $5$ $2� 7"�� ���"" 6 ;�3 $; ;4� ;�3 $; �"6;�7�8�/! ��0 $555 $�5$ $�3� $5$ $2� � ?���,��+�"��=��@7 ;45 ;45 ;45 ;�� ;�� ;�� ;3� ;3� ;3� ;�� ;�� ;��9��8"��7�"���/%!�0 $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$:�6A;�7�8�/%!�0 � 3 $�� 4 $2 2� � � 1 2� 1� ������ 6,�"����/%!�0 $2� (� �9��,!�7�8�/%!�0 � 3 � 3 51 � 1 ��� *��+;�� 6-;�/B>��0 3 $ $ 3 1 1@ %��. ��� -�/:0 $: $: $: �: �: �: 1: 1: 1: $: $: $:�,�����! � �� � �� ���"���" �" 6���- - 2 � $ 5� ���"" 6���- - 2 ���"," 6�9� �=�9�/-0 $3; $3; $3; � ; 2 ; &++ �"�% �9� �=���/-0 $3; $3; $3; � ; 2 ; ��"," 6��>*��"�� ;�1 ;�1 ;�1 ;1$ ;5�* ��� ���� �/-0 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; (� �9�!�*!�/%!�0 142 2 5 2 2 2�3 � 3%>-��"������" ;$� � ;$1 � ;$�%>-��"���� �� � ;$� ; 2%>���"�� ;31 ;3 ;$5 ;2$ ;1$���+����� �=�6$ �$;� �$;4 $�;� $�;4 3;������ --����7�"�� $; $; $; $;$� 1;35���� � �"�� �=�6� 3;� 2;2 ;4 �;1 ;4� ��/-0 ��;� �5;� � ;4 �1;3 �$;�( % ��+�� �%�� * * * * *�!!������ ��/-0 �5;� ; � ;4 ��;2�!!�����(�� * � * *

��" �- �"�����,����@*���% �� �*��"���� � �1;� @*��( % ��+�� �%�� *@*��.�,� �"��*!��"���"�� ;1���"," 6�*�� �( ��"��/-0� 53; �,���+��-"�"�� �/-0 $ ; ��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"��� 32;�: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3�����*��"���(� �9��,!

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 6: W. 1st Street & Central Avenue ������������ 1 ���

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �5

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/%!�0 $1 ��3 $1 24 4� $3 2� �6 �7�8�/%!�!0 $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� (� �)�6"�� $� $ $� $� $� $� $� $1 $� $ $ $�9�6 �/:0 �1: $: : 1:��"�(�-"�"�� �/-0 3; 3; 3; 3; (� ��"�;�7�"�� ;�3 $; $; $; 7�!<=�! 6><�? - $; $; $; $; 7!<=�! 6><�? - $; $; $; $; 7�" ;�� ;�$ $; $; 7"����" �" 6 $; $; ;�3 $; �"6;�7�8�/!��"0 1$ 5 $��3 $353 $5247"�� ���"" 6 $; $; ;3� $; �"6;�7�8�/! ��0 1$ 5 $��3 �55 $524� ?���,��+�"��=��@7 ;4� ;4� ;4� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;4$ ;4$ ;4$ ;�5 ;�5 ;�59��8"��7�"���/%!�0 $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$:�6A;�7�8�/%!�0 $� 13$ $� 55 $$� �� �� ������ 6,�"����/%!�0 2 $ $ (� �9��,!�7�8�/%!�0 14$ 42 �� �� *��+;�� 6-;�/B>��0 $ 3 3 $ � �@ %��. ��� -�/:0 �: �: �: �: �: �: $: $: $: 5: 5: 5:�,�����! � �� � �����" �" 6���- - 2 � 5� ���"" 6���- - 2 5��"," 6�9� �=�9�/-0 2 ;$ 4;� 4;� 4;�&++ �"�% �9� �=���/-0 2 ;$ 4;� 4;� 4;���"," 6��>*��"�� ;54 ;$3 ;$3 ;$3* ��� ���� �/-0 3; 3; 3; 3; . ��� �&G" �-����/-0 1; 1; 1; 1; (� �9�!�*!�/%!�0 �$$4 �51 $21 �22%>-��"������" � ; 3 ; 2%>-��"���� �� ;$� ; �%>���"�� ;$4 ;1� ;$3 ;1 ���+����� �=�6$ 1;2 ��;2 �$;4 ��;1����� --����7�"�� $; $; $; $; ���� � �"�� �=�6� ;� ;� ;3 ;�� ��/-0 1;5 �1;$ ��;1 �1; ( % ��+�� �%�� � * * *�!!������ ��/-0 1;5 ; �1;$ ��;4�!!�����(�� � � * *

��" �- �"�����,����@*���% �� �*��"���� � $$;� @*��( % ��+�� �%�� '@*��.�,� �"��*!��"���"�� ;� ��"," 6�*�� �( ��"��/-0� 34;4 �,���+��-"�"�� �/-0 $ ; ��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"��� 3 ;2: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3�����*��"���(� �9��,!

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 7: E. 1st Street & State Street ������������ 1 ���

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� ��

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/%!�0 $14 �5 � �42 $� �6 �7�8�/%!�!0 $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� (� �)�6"�� $� $1 $� $� $� $� $� $1 $� $� $2 $�9�6 �/:0 $: �$: �$: �1:��"�(�-"�"�� �/-0 3; 3; 3; (� ��"�;�7�"�� ;�3 $; $; 7�!<=�! 6><�? - $; $; $; 7!<=�! 6><�? - $; $; $; 7�" $; $; $; 7"����" �" 6 ;�4 ;�3 $; �"6;�7�8�/!��"0 135� $�21 $�3�7"�� ���"" 6 ;�4 ;�3 $; �"6;�7�8�/! ��0 135� $�21 $�3�� ?���,��+�"��=��@7 ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;4� ;4� ;4�9��8"��7�"���/%!�0 $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$:�6A;�7�8�/%!�0 $33 ��� 4 15� $3 ������ 6,�"����/%!�0 � (� �9��,!�7�8�/%!�0 231 15� $3 *��+;�� 6-;�/B>��0 1 � � 1 � � � �@ %��. ��� -�/:0 �: �: �: �: �: �: �: �: �: 3: 3: 3:�,�����! � �� � �����" �" 6���- - 2 5� ���"" 6���- - 2 5��"," 6�9� �=�9�/-0 ��; 11; 11; &++ �"�% �9� �=���/-0 ��; 11; 11; ��"," 6��>*��"�� ;12 ;3$ ;3$* ��� ���� �/-0 3; 3; 3; (� �9�!�*!�/%!�0 $� 5 443 ��3%>-��"������" ; $%>-��"���� �� ;$1 � ;�$%>���"�� ;14 ;2$ ; ����+����� �=�6$ $5;1 �;� �;������ --����7�"�� $; ; � ; ����� � �"�� �=�6� ;� $;� ; � ��/-0 $�;� �;$ ;5( % ��+�� �%�� ' � ��!!������ ��/-0 $�;� ; ; �; �!!�����(�� ' � � �

��" �- �"�����,����@*���% �� �*��"���� � $ ;1 @*��( % ��+�� �%�� '@*��.�,� �"��*!��"���"�� ;2 ��"," 6�*�� �( ��"��/-0� 53; �,���+��-"�"�� �/-0 $ ; ��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"��� �5;�: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3�����*��"���(� �9��,!

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 8: E. 1st Street & Wilson Avenue ������������ 1 ���

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �4

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 $� 1�2 $3 $2� � �����*��"�� 7� 7� �"�! �"�!9�6 : : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�5 ;�5 ;�5 ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;��@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 $2 21� $�1 $�� � � 6 -"���- $ $ �(� �)�6"��/+"0 $�; ; $�; )?�����! 6�/+">-0 2; 2; 2; � �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0 13$!D=�!"����,�<��? 6 ;�2 ;�2 ;�2 ;�2 ;�2 ;�2%*=����+��"����%�,� 5 4 251 25� 213 33� 515 $%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� 333 2 � 2 $ 1�1 2�� 343 $"*=�-��� �/-0 2;$ 2;$ �;$ 5;3 5;� �;$ 5;3 5;�"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 �;� �;� 1;3 2; 1;1 1;3 2; 1;1! �E, , �+� �: �� $ $ 53 $ $ $ $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 $5$� �3� 3�� 3 � 513 1�4 1�3 $ 41

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ &'�� &'�1 �'�$ �'��.�,� ���" $2 21� $�1 $$4 5�.�,� �( +" $2 .�,� �����" $�1 ���@ $5$� $� $� 3 � 3 �.�,� �"��*!��"� ; $ ;�3 ;$ ;�2 ;$�F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 $ �1 $ *��"���� ��/-0 �;� ; ; $2;2 $1;$(� �(�� � ' '�!!������ ��/-0 ;� $1;��!!�����(�� '

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� 1;1��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 22;$: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 10: Imperial Street & E. Front Street ������������ 1 ���

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� ��

��% � �" &'( &'� �'( �'� �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 $$ $� $ 2 2 1� 5�����*��"�� �"�! 7� 7� 9�6 : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;52 ;52 ;4� ;4� ;45 ;45@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 $� �$ $ 32� 2�4 4� 6 -"���-(� �)�6"��/+"0)?�����! 6�/+">-0� �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� �34 �21 243%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� �34 �21 243"*=�-��� �/-0 5;4 5;� 2;�"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 1;3 1;1 �;�! �E, , �+� �: �3 �� $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 12� �52 $ 5

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ �'�$ �'�� �'�$ �'��.�,� ���" 2 $42 153 1$4 $5�.�,� �( +" $� $ .�,� �����" �$ 4��@ 243 $ 5 $� $� $� .�,� �"��*!��"� ; 4 ; ;�$ ;$� ;$ F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 � *��"���� ��/-0 $1;$ ;$ ; ; ; (� �(�� ' ��!!������ ��/-0 $1;$ ; ; �!!�����(�� '

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� ;3��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� �1;�: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 11: E.2nd Street & E. Front Street ������������ 1 ���

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �$

��% � �" &'( &'� �'( �'� �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 2 24 24 2 $ 14� �����*��"�� �"�! 7� 7� 9�6 �1: 1: �1:� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�1 ;�1 ;4$ ;4$ ;�� ;��@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 3 3� 55 33 25$ � 6 -"���-(� �)�6"��/+"0)?�����! 6�/+">-0� �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� $$2� 25$ 25$%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� $$2� 25$ 25$"*=�-��� �/-0 5;2 5;� 2;$"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 1;3 1;1 �;�! �E, , �+� �: �4 � �2����!��"��/% �>�0 � 5 3�3 $ �3

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ &'�� �'�$ �'�� �'�$ �'��.�,� ���" 3 3� 55 33 25$ .�,� �( +" 3 55 .�,� �����" 3� ��@ � 5 3�3 $ �3 $� $� $� .�,� �"��*!��"� ; � ;$ ; 5 ;1� ;�� ; F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 � 4 3 *��"���� ��/-0 ��;� $$;� 4;3 ; ; ; (� �(�� * ' ��!!������ ��/-0 $�;5 ;� ; �!!�����(�� '

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� $;���" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 1�; : �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 12: E.2nd Street & Wilson Avenue ������������ 1 ���

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �$$

��% � �" )'( )'� �'� �'� �'( �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 �1 $ 2� �3 $ 1 1������*��"�� �"�! 7� 7� 9�6 : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;43 ;43 ;�4 ;�4 ;�5 ;�5@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 1 $1$ 5� 15 $3 2�� 6 -"���- 2 � �(� �)�6"��/+"0 $�; $�; $�; )?�����! 6�/+">-0 2; 2; 2; � �� �"�'��?� $����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� 2� �4 $ 5%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� 2� �4 $ 5"*=�-��� �/-0 5;2 5;� 2;$"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 1;3 1;1 �;�! �E, , �+� �: �2 4� � ����!��"��/% �>�0 3�� ��2 $24

��� �"���=�(� �B )'�$ �'�$ �'�� �'�$.�,� ���" $5$ 5� 15 $��.�,� �( +" 1 $3 .�,� �����" $1$ 15 ��@ 42$ $� $� $24 .�,� �"��*!��"� ;$� ; 2 ; � ;$ F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 $4 4*��"���� ��/-0 $ ;1 ; ; 5;$(� �(�� ' ��!!������ ��/-0 $ ;1 ; 5;$�!!�����(�� '

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� 5;���" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 1$;1: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 13: E.2nd Street & Pine Street ������������ 1 ���

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �$�

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 2 $� $ �� 1 1 $ 1 �2�����*��"�� 7� 7� �"�! �"�!9�6 : : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;4� ;4� ;4� ;�1 ;�1 ;�1 $; $; $; ;�5 ;�5 ;�5@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 3 $31 $ $$5 2 1 $ 1 �4� 6 -"���- $ $ � �(� �)�6"��/+"0 $�; $�; $�; $�; )?�����! 6�/+">-0 2; 2; 2; 2; � �� �"�'��?� $����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� $�5 $35 1$� ��� $3� ��$ ��$ $�5%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� $�5 $35 1$� ��� $3� ��$ ��$ $�5"*=�-��� �/-0 2;$ 2;$ �;$ 5;3 5;� �;$ 5;3 5;�"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 �;� �;� 1;3 2; 1;1 1;3 2; 1;1! �E, , �+� �: $ $ �� $ $ �� $ ������!��"��/% �>�0 $234 $2�� 5$4 5$3 4�� 533 5$5 ��2

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ )'�$ �'�$ �'�$.�,� ���" $3� $$� 2 1$.�,� �( +" 3 1 1.�,� �����" $ 2 $ �4��@ $234 $2�� 55� 442.�,� �"��*!��"� ; ; ; $ ; 2F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 $ 1*��"���� ��/-0 ;1 ; $ ;2 �;�(� �(�� � ' ��!!������ ��/-0 ;1 ; $ ;2 �;��!!�����(�� ' �

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� $;���" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� �$;�: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 14: Imperial Street & E.2nd Street ������������ 1 ���

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �$1

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 3 5 � � 5� � 3 34 $�����*��"�� �"�! �"�! 7� 7� 9�6 : : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;25 ;25 ;25 ;�3 ;�3 ;�3 ;54 ;54 ;54 ;4� ;4� ;4�@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 $� $2 3 $1 $$1 1 5 �� $� 6 -"���- $ � 2(� �)�6"��/+"0 $�; $�; $�; )?�����! 6�/+">-0 2; 2; 2; � �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� �$4 � 2 �2 �$2 � 1 $� �3 $$4%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� �$4 � 2 �2 �$2 � 1 $� �3 $$4"*=�-��� �/-0 �;$ 5;3 5;� �;$ 5;3 5;� 2;$ 2;$"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 1;3 2; 1;1 1;3 2; 1;1 �;� �;�! �E, , �+� �: �4 �4 $ $ $ �� $ $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 ��3 5�$ ��1 ��� 5�� �1� $31 $24

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ )'�$ �'�$ �'�$.�,� ���" 1$ $1 $$5 4 .�,� �( +" $� 5.�,� �����" 3 $1 1 $��@ �1� �1� $31 $24 .�,� �"��*!��"� ; 2 ; $ ; ; F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 1 $ *��"���� ��/-0 $ ;$ 4;� ; ;5(� �(�� ' � ��!!������ ��/-0 $ ;$ 4;� ; ;5�!!�����(�� ' �

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� �; ��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� � ;2: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 19: E. 1st Street & E. Front Street ������������ 1 ���

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �$2

��% � �" &'( &'� )'� )'� �&( �&�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 1�5 2$3 �����*��"�� 7� 7� �"�!9�6 : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;��@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 232 3 $ � 6 -"���-(� �)�6"��/+"0)?�����! 6�/+">-0� �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0 5$4!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� 3 $ ��� %*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� 3 $ ��� "*=�-��� �/-0 2;$ 5;4 5;�"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 �;� 1;3 1;1! �E, , �+� �: $ $ $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 $ 5 �2$ $ 42

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ &'�� )'�$ )'��.�,� ���" ��� ��� �3 �3 .�,� �( +" .�,� �����" �3 �3 ��@ $� $� $� $� .�,� �"��*!��"� ;$1 ;$1 ;$3 ;$3F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 *��"���� ��/-0 ; ; ; ; (� �(���!!������ ��/-0 ; ; �!!�����(��

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� ; ��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� $�;2: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 121: E. 2nd Alley & Wilson Avenue ������������ 1 ���

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �$3

��% � �" &'( &'� �'( �'� �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 � 1 $21 $13 3�����*��"�� �"�! 7� 7� 9�6 : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;3 ;3 ;�4 ;�4 ;�5 ;�5@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 2 2 � 2 $�� �� 6 -"���- � �(� �)�6"��/+"0 $�; $�; )?�����! 6�/+">-0 2; 2; � �� �"�'��?� $����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� 2� � 1 � 2%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� 2� � 1 � 2"*=�-��� �/-0 5;2 5;� 2;$"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 1;3 1;1 �;�! �E, , �+� �: �� $ $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 34� 42� $1�1

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ �'�$ �'�$.�,� ���" 2 � 4 � 2.�,� �( +" 2 2 .�,� �����" ���@ 34� $1�1 $� .�,� �"��*!��"� ; $ ; ;$�F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 $ *��"���� ��/-0 $$;� ;� ; (� �(�� ' ��!!������ ��/-0 $$;� ;� ; �!!�����(�� '

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� ;���" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� �$;�: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 1: W. Front Street & Petroleum Street ������������ 1 ���

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �$

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/%!�0 1� � $�5 ��� � � 3 � �6 �7�8�/%!�!0 $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� 9�6 �/:0 1: 2: �1: :��"�(�-"�"�� �/-0 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; (� ��"�;�7�"�� $; $; $; $; $; $; 7�!<=�! 6><�? - $; ;�� $; ;�� $; $; 7!<=�! 6><�? - ;�� $; $; $; $; $; 7�" $; ;43 $; ;43 $; $; 7"����" �" 6 ;�3 $; ;�3 $; $; $; �"6;�7�8�/!��"0 $�53 $35� $�2� $3�2 $� � $44$7"�� ���"" 6 ;�3 $; ;�3 $; $; $; �"6;�7�8�/! ��0 $�53 $35� $�2� $3�2 $� � $44$� ?���,��+�"��=��@7 ;4$ ;4$ ;4$ ;43 ;43 ;43 ;41 ;41 ;41 ;�� ;�� ;��9��8"��7�"���/%!�0 $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$:�6A;�7�8�/%!�0 22 $ �35 133 �� 5 5 ������ 6,�"����/%!�0 5 $�� (� �9��,!�7�8�/%!�0 22 2 �35 $34 �� 5 5 *��+;�� 6-;�/B>��0 3 1 1 3 � 1 1 �@ %��. ��� -�/:0 : : : $: $: $: $: $: $: $: $: $:�,�����! �,-"�� �,-"�� �,-"�� �,-"�����" �" 6���- - � 5� ���"" 6���- - 2 2 4 4��"," 6�9� �=�9�/-0 2 ; 2 ; 2 ; 2 ; 2 ; 2 ; &++ �"�% �9� �=���/-0 2 ; 2 ; 2 ; 2 ; 2 ; 2 ; ��"," 6��>*��"�� ;22 ;22 ;22 ;22 ;22 ;22* ��� ���� �/-0 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; (� �9�!�*!�/%!�0 �42 5�5 ��5 5�� 424 415%>-��"������" ;$2 � ;1�%>-��"���� �� ; � ; � ;$3 ;$ %>���"�� ; 5 ; $ ;11 ;�1 ;1� ;�����+����� �=�6$ $2;� $1;� $5;1 $3;3 $5;� � ;3����� --����7�"�� $; $; ;41 ;2� ;�2 $; ���� � �"�� �=�6� ;$ ; $;$ ;4 ;� 3;2� ��/-0 $2;2 $1;� $2;3 4;2 $�;� �3;�( % ��+�� �%�� ' ' ' � ' *�!!������ ��/-0 $2;1 $$; $�;� �3;��!!�����(�� ' ' ' *

��" �- �"�����,����@*���% �� �*��"���� � $�;1 @*��( % ��+�� �%�� '@*��.�,� �"��*!��"���"�� ;31��"," 6�*�� �( ��"��/-0� � ; �,���+��-"�"�� �/-0 $ ; ��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"��� �$;�: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� 7���-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3�����*��"���(� �9��,!

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 2: W. Front Street & Central Avenue ������������ 1 ���

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� ��

��% � �" &'� &'� )'( )'� �'( �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 $5� 144 4� �����*��"�� 7� 7� �"�!9�6 �2: $: �1:� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�� ;�� ;�$ ;�$ ;�� ;��@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 � 2 2�1 $$3 � 6 -"���- 1 $(� �)�6"��/+"0 ; $�; )?�����! 6�/+">-0 2; 2; � �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0 14 145!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� $ 524 $%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� $ 524 $"*=�-��� �/-0 2;$ 5;4 5;�"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 �;� 1;3 1;1! �E, , �+� �: 4� 54 $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 $5$� 135 $ 44

��� �"���=�(� �B )'�$ )'�� �'�$.�,� ���" 15$ 1$5 $$3.�,� �( +" � 2 $$3.�,� �����" ��@ $5$� $� 135.�,� �"��*!��"� ;$1 ;$� ;1�F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 $$ 12*��"���� ��/-0 2;� ; $�;�(� �(�� � *�!!������ ��/-0 �;3 $�;��!!�����(�� *

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� 3; ��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 4 ;4: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 3: E. Front Street & Veterans Memorial Bridge ������������ 1 ���

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �1

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/%!�0 $� 1 � 21 $1� 2$3 �1��6 �7�8�/%!�!0 $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� (� �)�6"�� $� $� $� $ $$ $� $� $� $� $� $� $39�6 �/:0 �$: $: �$: ��:��"�(�-"�"�� �/-0 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; (� ��"�;�7�"�� $; $; $; $; $; $; 7�!<=�! 6><�? - $; $; $; $; $; ;�47!<=�! 6><�? - $; $; $; $; $; $; 7�" $; $; ;43 $; $; ;437"����" �" 6 ;�3 $; $; $; $; $; �"6;�7�8�/!��"0 $533 $4 � $3�$ $4�$ $� $�137"�� ���"" 6 ;�3 $; $; $; $; $; �"6;�7�8�/! ��0 $533 $4 � $3�$ $4�$ $� $�13� ?���,��+�"��=��@7 ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�3 ;�3 ;�3 ;�$ ;�$ ;�$ ;�3 ;�3 ;�39��8"��7�"���/%!�0 $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$:�6A;�7�8�/%!�0 �� 15$ 3 � $5� 243 ��������� 6,�"����/%!�0 ��� $33(� �9��,!�7�8�/%!�0 �� 15$ ��1 $5� 243 $�2*��+;�� 6-;�/B>��0 � � � �$ �$ �@ %��. ��� -�/:0 : : : $: $: $: $: $: $: $: $: $:�,�����! � �� � �� � �����" �" 6���- - 4 � 5� ���"" 6���- - 4 4 5��"," 6�9� �=�9�/-0 2 ; 2 ; 2 ; 2 ; 2 ; 2 ; &++ �"�% �9� �=���/-0 2 ; 2 ; 2 ; 2 ; 2 ; 2 ; ��"," 6��>*��"�� ;22 ;22 ;22 ;22 ;22 ;22* ��� ���� �/-0 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; (� �9�!�*!�/%!�0 �15 4 2 � � 42 422 ��$%>-��"������" � ;� ; � � ;�5%>-��"���� �� ; $ ;$2 ; �%>���"�� ; 1 ;23 ;1� ;� ;3� ;$5���+����� �=�6$ $2;$ $�;2 $5;� $3;� $4;� $3; ����� --����7�"�� $; $; $; $;3� $; $; ���� � �"�� �=�6� ;$ $;4 $;� ;3 �;4 ;2� ��/-0 $2;� $�;� $�;1 �2;2 �$;3 $3;2( % ��+�� �%�� ' ' ' * * '�!!������ ��/-0 ; $4; �2;2 $�;1�!!�����(�� � ' * '

��" �- �"�����,����@*���% �� �*��"���� � $�;$ @*��( % ��+�� �%�� '@*��.�,� �"��*!��"���"�� ;3$��"," 6�*�� �( ��"��/-0� � ; �,���+��-"�"�� �/-0 $ ; ��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"��� �2; : �*��( % ��+�� �%�� 7���-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3�����*��"���(� �9��,!

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 4: E. Front Street & Wilson Avenue ������������ 1 ���

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �2

��% � �" &'� &'� )'( )'� �'( �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 251 �43 �����*��"�� 7� 7� �"�!9�6 : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�� ;�� ;� ;� ;42 ;42@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 3�$ 1�� � 6 -"���-(� �)�6"��/+"0)?�����! 6�/+">-0� �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0 143!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� �45 %*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� �45 "*=�-��� �/-0 2;$ 5;4 5;�"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 �;� 1;3 1;1! �E, , �+� �: $ 23 $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 $5�� 542 $ 44

��� �"���=�(� �B )'�$ )'�� �'�$ �'��.�,� ���" �45 �45 $44 $44.�,� �( +" $44 $44.�,� �����" ��@ $� $� 542 542.�,� �"��*!��"� ;$� ;$� ;�4 ;�4F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 �4 �4*��"���� ��/-0 ; ; $�;� $�;�(� �(�� ' '�!!������ ��/-0 ; $�;��!!�����(�� '

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� 2;���" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 5$;1: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � '���-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 5: W. 1st Street & Petroleum Street ������������ 1 ���

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �3

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/%!�0 $�2 $3$ 1 5 12 5 1$4 3� 12$�6 �7�8�/%!�!0 $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� (� �)�6"�� $ $ $� $1 $1 $� $� $2 $� $ $ $�9�6 �/:0 ��: 1: �3: �:��"�(�-"�"�� �/-0 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; (� ��"�;�7�"�� $; $; $; $; $; 7�!<=�! 6><�? - $; $; $; $; $; 7!<=�! 6><�? - ;�5 $; $; $; $; 7�" $; $; ;�4 $; ;4�7"����" �" 6 ;�3 $; ;�� ;�3 $; �"6;�7�8�/!��"0 $5$� $�5� � � $5$ $2�27"�� ���"" 6 ;�3 $; ;�$ ;�3 $; �"6;�7�8�/! ��0 $5$� $�5� $432 $5$ $2�2� ?���,��+�"��=��@7 ;4 ;4 ;4 ;�� ;�� ;�� ;54 ;54 ;54 ;�2 ;�2 ;�29��8"��7�"���/%!�0 $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$:�6A;�7�8�/%!�0 �2$ �$ 2 $ 35 $ 1�5 5$ 2 1������ 6,�"����/%!�0 $3� (� �9��,!�7�8�/%!�0 �2$ �$2 �5 1�5 1 � *��+;�� 6-;�/B>��0 $1 1 1 $1 � �@ %��. ��� -�/:0 $: $: $: �: �: �: : : : $: $: $:�,�����! � �� � �� ���"���" �" 6���- - 2 � $ 5� ���"" 6���- - 2 ���"," 6�9� �=�9�/-0 �3; �3; $3; 13; 33; &++ �"�% �9� �=���/-0 �3; �3; $3; 13; 33; ��"," 6��>*��"�� ;�4 ;�4 ;$� ;1� ;5$* ��� ���� �/-0 3; 3; 3; 3; 3; (� �9�!�*!�/%!�0 23 2�$ 1 � 5�5 � $%>-��"������" ;$� � ;�1 � ;�$%>-��"���� �� � ;$3 ; 2%>���"�� ;32 ;22 ;�3 ;5 ;12���+����� �=�6$ ��;5 �5;� 1�;5 �$;� 4;5����� --����7�"�� $; $; $; $;�$ 3; ����� � �"�� �=�6� 2;3 �;4 $;� 1;2 ;4� ��/-0 1�;$ ��;3 12;3 1 ; 22;3( % ��+�� �%�� * * * * ��!!������ ��/-0 1 ;� ; 12;3 14; �!!�����(�� * � * �

��" �- �"�����,����@*���% �� �*��"���� � 13;2 @*��( % ��+�� �%�� �@*��.�,� �"��*!��"���"�� ;3 ��"," 6�*�� �( ��"��/-0� � ; �,���+��-"�"�� �/-0 $ ; ��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"��� �3; : �*��( % ��+�� �%�� ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3�����*��"���(� �9��,!

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 6: W. 1st Street & Central Avenue ������������ 1 ���

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �5

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/%!�0 �5 1�3 33 24 41 4 4� �6 �7�8�/%!�!0 $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� (� �)�6"�� $� $ $� $� $� $� $� $1 $� $ $ $�9�6 �/:0 �1: $: : 1:��"�(�-"�"�� �/-0 3; 3; 3; 3; (� ��"�;�7�"�� ;�3 $; $; $; 7�!<=�! 6><�? - $; ;�4 $; $; 7!<=�! 6><�? - $; $; ;�� $; 7�" ;�4 ;�$ $; $; 7"����" �" 6 $; $; ;�3 $; �"6;�7�8�/!��"0 1��� $�25 $5�1 $���7"�� ���"" 6 $; $; ;34 $; �"6;�7�8�/! ��0 1��� $�25 �45 $���� ?���,��+�"��=��@7 ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;42 ;42 ;42 ;�� ;�� ;��9��8"��7�"���/%!�0 $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$:�6A;�7�8�/%!�0 1$ 2�� 55 51 $$ $$� $$3 ������ 6,�"����/%!�0 4 45 (� �9��,!�7�8�/%!�0 355 4� $$� $$3 *��+;�� 6-;�/B>��0 $2 � � $2 $1 $$ $$ $1@ %��. ��� -�/:0 �: �: �: �: �: �: $: $: $: $: $: $:�,�����! � �� � �����" �" 6���- - 2 � 5� ���"" 6���- - 2 5��"," 6�9� �=�9�/-0 3 ;1 $�;� $�;� $�;�&++ �"�% �9� �=���/-0 3 ;1 $�;� $�;� $�;���"," 6��>*��"�� ;5� ;$4 ;$4 ;$4* ��� ���� �/-0 3; 3; 3; 3; . ��� �&G" �-����/-0 1; 1; 1; 1; (� �9�!�*!�/%!�0 ��24 1 4 $�2 1 3%>-��"������" ; 3 ; �%>-��"���� �� ;$� � ;$$%>���"�� ;�3 ;�4 ;52 ;14���+����� �=�6$ 2;1 �5;$ �4; �5;5����� --����7�"�� $; $; $; $; ���� � �"�� �=�6� ;1 ;3 �;� ;4� ��/-0 2;5 �5;5 13;� ��;2( % ��+�� �%�� � * � *�!!������ ��/-0 2;5 ; �5;5 1$;5�!!�����(�� � � * *

��" �- �"�����,����@*���% �� �*��"���� � $2;4 @*��( % ��+�� �%�� '@*��.�,� �"��*!��"���"�� ;11��"," 6�*�� �( ��"��/-0� �1;� �,���+��-"�"�� �/-0 $ ; ��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"��� 53;1: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� *���-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3�����*��"���(� �9��,!

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 7: E. 1st Street & State Street ������������ 1 ���

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� ��

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/%!�0 $2� 1� �1 141 22 �6 �7�8�/%!�!0 $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� $� (� �)�6"�� $� $1 $� $� $� $� $� $1 $� $� $2 $�9�6 �/:0 $: �$: �$: �1:��"�(�-"�"�� �/-0 3; 3; 3; (� ��"�;�7�"�� ;�3 $; $; 7�!<=�! 6><�? - $; $; $; 7!<=�! 6><�? - $; ;�� $; 7�" ;�� $; $; 7"����" �" 6 ;�� ;�3 $; �"6;�7�8�/!��"0 13�5 $��1 � 1�7"�� ���"" 6 ;�� ;�3 $; �"6;�7�8�/! ��0 13�5 $��1 � 1�� ?���,��+�"��=��@7 ;�1 ;�1 ;�1 ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�5 ;�5 ;�59��8"��7�"���/%!�0 $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$: $$$:�6A;�7�8�/%!�0 $5� 253 �� 221 3$ ������ 6,�"����/%!�0 1 (� �9��,!�7�8�/%!�0 534 221 3$ *��+;�� 6-;�/B>��0 2 5 5 2 $� $1 $2 $�*��+;�'�? -�/B>��0 $@ %��. ��� -�/:0 $: $: $: �: �: �: �: �: �: $: $: $:�,�����! � �� � �����" �" 6���- - 2 5� ���"" 6���- - 2 5��"," 6�9� �=�9�/-0 11; 2�; 2�; &++ �"�% �9� �=���/-0 11; 2�; 2�; ��"," 6��>*��"�� ;1� ;3� ;3�* ��� ���� �/-0 3; 3; 3; (� �9�!�*!�/%!�0 $1$� �15 $ 52%>-��"������" ; 1%>-��"���� �� ;$4 � ;�3%>���"�� ;3 ;2� ; 3���+����� �=�6$ ��;$ $1;5 $ ;3����� --����7�"�� $; ;$ ;$2���� � �"�� �=�6� $;1 $;2 ;$� ��/-0 �1;2 �;4 $;3( % ��+�� �%�� * � ��!!������ ��/-0 �1;2 ; ; �;��!!�����(�� * � � �

��" �- �"�����,����@*���% �� �*��"���� � $2;5 @*��( % ��+�� �%�� '@*��.�,� �"��*!��"���"�� ;24��"," 6�*�� �( ��"��/-0� � ; �,���+��-"�"�� �/-0 $ ; ��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"��� $ 5;�: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� 9���-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3�����*��"���(� �9��,!

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 8: E. 1st Street & Wilson Avenue ������������ 1 ���

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �4

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 �4 244 �53 �3� � �����*��"�� 7� 7� �"�! �"�!9�6 : : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�3 ;�3 ;�3 ;�� ;�� ;�� ;4$ ;4$ ;4$ ;�� ;�� ;��@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 11 3� 1$ 13� 1 � 6 -"���- 3 2 2(� �)�6"��/+"0 $�; ; $�; )?�����! 6�/+">-0 2; 2; 2; � �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0 13$!D=�!"����,�<��? 6 ;4$ ;4$ ;4$ ;4$ ;4$ ;4$%*=����+��"����%�,� 442 523 52 3�4 4$4 �2� 3%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� �1� 221 21� 15$ 534 4� 3"*=�-��� �/-0 2;$ 2;$ �;$ 5;3 5;� �;$ 5;3 5;�"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 �;� �;� 1;3 2; 1;1 1;3 2; 1;1! �E, , �+� �: �4 $ $ $1 $ $ $ $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 $51 � 2$3 2 � 331 �� �23 $ �2

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ &'�� &'�1 �'�$ �'��.�,� ���" 11 3� 1$ �13 $� .�,� �( +" 11 .�,� �����" 1$ 1��@ $51 $� $� 2 � 2 �.�,� �"��*!��"� ; � ;12 ;$4 ;34 ;��F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 � 44 1 *��"���� ��/-0 �;1 ; ; �3;1 $�;2(� �(�� � � *�!!������ ��/-0 ;1 ��;5�!!�����(�� *

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� 5;3��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 35; : �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � '���-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 10: Imperial Street & E. Front Street ������������ 1 ���

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� ��

��% � �" &'( &'� �'( �'� �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 15 $4 $ 2�� 2�� $1�����*��"�� �"�! 7� 7� 9�6 : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�$ ;�$ ;44 ;44 ;�1 ;�1@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 35 �4 $1 31� 351 $5� 6 -"���-(� �)�6"��/+"0)?�����! 6�/+">-0� �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� 455 �4� 3��%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� 455 �4� 3��"*=�-��� �/-0 5;4 5;� 2;$"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 1;3 1;1 �;�! �E, , �+� �: 4$ �5 ������!��"��/% �>�0 ��1 �$1 ��$

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ �'�$ �'�� �'�$ �'��.�,� ���" 42 $�� 13� 1�5 � 1.�,� �( +" 35 $1 .�,� �����" �4 $5��@ 152 ��$ $� $� $� .�,� �"��*!��"� ;�1 ; $ ;�$ ;�� ;$�F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 �� $ *��"���� ��/-0 $�;4 ;� ; ; ; (� �(�� * ��!!������ ��/-0 $�;4 ;� ; �!!�����(�� *

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� $;1��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 1$;�: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 11: E.2nd Street & E. Front Street ������������ 1 ���

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �$

��% � �" &'( &'� �'( �'� �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 2 4� 4� 211 242 5�����*��"�� �"�! 7� 7� 9�6 �1: 1: �1:� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;5� ;5� ;�� ;�� ;4� ;4�@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 5 $1� $ � 3�� 5$4 4� 6 -"���-(� �)�6"��/+"0)?�����! 6�/+">-0� �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� $133 5$4 5�3%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� $133 5$4 5�3"*=�-��� �/-0 5;2 5;� 2;$"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 1;3 1;1 �;�! �E, , �+� �: �5 �1 4�����!��"��/% �>�0 $24 2�1 �5$

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ &'�� �'�$ �'�� �'�$ �'��.�,� ���" 5 $1� $ � 3�� 5$4 4.�,� �( +" 5 $ � .�,� �����" $1� 4��@ $24 2�1 �5$ $� $� $� .�,� �"��*!��"� ; 2 ;�� ;$$ ;1$ ;15 ; F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 1 �� � *��"���� ��/-0 1 ;2 $2;� �;� ; ; ; (� �(�� � ' ��!!������ ��/-0 $3;� $;5 ; �!!�����(�� *

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� �;1��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 2�;$: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 12: E.2nd Street & Wilson Avenue ������������ 1 ���

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �$$

��% � �" )'( )'� �'� �'� �'( �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 4� $�2 5 �� ��� 2 �����*��"�� �"�! 7� 7� 9�6 : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�1 ;�1 ;�2 ;�2 ;� ;� @�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 �4 �1� �$ 43 �4� 2�� 6 -"���- 3 $�(� �)�6"��/+"0 $�; $�; )?�����! 6�/+">-0 2; 2; � �� �"�'��?� $����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� 5� �1 $5$%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� 5� �1 $5$"*=�-��� �/-0 5;2 5;� 2;$"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 1;3 1;1 �;�! �E, , �+� �: � �5 4 ����!��"��/% �>�0 11$ �3� $2�3

��� �"���=�(� �B )'�$ �'�$ �'�� �'�$.�,� ���" 1�� �$ 43 11�.�,� �( +" �4 �4�.�,� �����" �1� 43 ��@ 5$$ $� $� $2�3.�,� �"��*!��"� ;32 ; 2 ; 3 ;� F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 4 $4*��"���� ��/-0 $�;5 ; ; �;�(� �(�� * ��!!������ ��/-0 $�;5 ; �;��!!�����(�� *

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� $ ; ��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 2�;�: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 13: E.2nd Street & Pine Street ������������ 1 ���

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �$�

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 $� ��$ 4 2 �2$ 4 � $ 5 $4 2 2������*��"�� 7� 7� �"�! �"�!9�6 : : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;4� ;4� ;4� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�3 ;�3 ;�3 ;4 ;4 ;4 @�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 �$ 114 $ 2 �� � 1 $ � �3 5 34� 6 -"���- 1 3 12(� �)�6"��/+"0 $�; $�; $�; )?�����! 6�/+">-0 2; 2; 2; � �� �"�'��?� 1����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� 1$1 131 �14 �$1 124 �$1 �$1 1$�%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� 1$1 131 �14 �$1 124 �$1 �$1 1$�"*=�-��� �/-0 2;$ 2;$ �;$ 5;3 5;� �;$ 5;3 5;�"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 �;� �;� 1;3 2; 1;1 1;3 2; 1;1! �E, , �+� �: �4 $ �� $ �� �� �4 ������!��"��/% �>�0 $��1 $�$� ��$ 12$ 5�� 1�$ 12$ �$$

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ )'�$ �'�$ �'�$.�,� ���" 15� �42 $1 4�.�,� �( +" �$ 2 1 �3.�,� �����" $ � � 34��@ $��1 $�$� 244 3 2.�,� �"��*!��"� ; � ; ; 1 ;$4F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 $ � $5*��"���� ��/-0 ;5 ;� $�;5 $1;�(� �(�� � � ' '�!!������ ��/-0 ;5 ;� $�;5 $1;��!!�����(�� ' '

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� �;���" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 2 ;4: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 14: Imperial Street & E.2nd Street ������������ 1 ���

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �$1

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 $� 5 3 5 $$ 2 2 $2 � $� $�1 $5�����*��"�� �"�! �"�! 7� 7� 9�6 : : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�3 ;�3 ;�3 ;�3 ;�3 ;�3 ;55 ;55 ;55 ;�� ;�� ;��@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 �4 � � � $5 3� � �13 $� $2 $�4 $4� 6 -"���- $ 2 1(� �)�6"��/+"0 $�; $�; $�; )?�����! 6�/+">-0 2; 2; 2; � �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� 35$ 2�5 �$� 3 3 3 �22 �$� �2�%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� 35$ 2�5 �$� 3 3 3 �22 �$� �2�"*=�-��� �/-0 �;$ 5;3 5;� �;$ 5;3 5;� 2;$ 2;$"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 1;3 2; 1;1 1;3 2; 1;1 �;� �;�! �E, , �+� �: �1 �4 �� �4 �� �1 $ ������!��"��/% �>�0 1�� 2� 41 25� 254 ��� $151 $11

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ )'�$ �'�$ �'�$.�,� ���" 22 42 �32 �1 .�,� �( +" �4 � � $2.�,� �����" � 3� $� $4��@ 225 534 $151 $11 .�,� �"��*!��"� ;$ ;$1 ; ; $F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 4 $$ $*��"���� ��/-0 $2; $$;1 ;� ;3(� �(�� ' ' � ��!!������ ��/-0 $2; $$;1 ;� ;3�!!�����(�� ' '

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� �;���" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 1�;�: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 19: E. 1st Street & E. Front Street ������������ 1 ���

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �$2

��% � �" &'( &'� )'� )'� �&( �&�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 1�5 2$3 �����*��"�� 7� 7� �"�!9�6 : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;��@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 232 3 $ � 6 -"���-(� �)�6"��/+"0)?�����! 6�/+">-0� �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0 5$4!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� 3 $ ��� %*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� 3 $ ��� "*=�-��� �/-0 2;$ 5;4 5;�"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 �;� 1;3 1;1! �E, , �+� �: $ $ $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 $ 5 �2$ $ 42

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ &'�� )'�$ )'��.�,� ���" ��� ��� �3 �3 .�,� �( +" .�,� �����" �3 �3 ��@ $� $� $� $� .�,� �"��*!��"� ;$1 ;$1 ;$3 ;$3F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 *��"���� ��/-0 ; ; ; ; (� �(���!!������ ��/-0 ; ; �!!�����(��

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� ; ��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� $�;2: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis ROUTE 62 121: E. 2nd Alley & Wilson Avenue ������������ 1 ���

�������������������������� �������������� !��"#�� �� �$3

��% � �" &'( &'� �'( �'� �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 3 3 1 �24 �52 ������*��"�� �"�! 7� 7� 9�6 : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;51 ;51 ;�2 ;�2 ;� ;� @�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 � � 2 ��1 1�5 �� 6 -"���- 1 $�(� �)�6"��/+"0 $�; $�; )?�����! 6�/+">-0 2; 2; � �� �"�'��?� $����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� 52� 11 11$%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� 52� 11 11$"*=�-��� �/-0 5;2 5;� 2;$"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 1;3 1;1 �;�! �E, , �+� �: �4 �� $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 21 �$3 $�1�

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ �'�$ �'�$.�,� ���" $4 ��5 1�4.�,� �( +" � 2 .�,� �����" � ���@ 31� $�1� $� .�,� �"��*!��"� ; 1 ; ;$�F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 1 *��"���� ��/-0 $$;� ;$ ; (� �(�� ' ��!!������ ��/-0 $$;� ;$ ; �!!�����(�� '

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� ;2��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� ��;$: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

�����������������������

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: E. 1st Street & Wilson AvenueRoute 62 Corridor Smart Transportation Study � �����1�� �)�-���"��&-"���6��%

#�� �������������� !��"

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 $� 1�2 $3 $2� � �����*��"�� 7� 7� �"�! �"�!9�6 : : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�5 ;�5 ;�5 ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;��@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 $� 1� $35 $5 � � 6 -"���- $ $ �(� �)�6"��/+"0 $�; ; $�; )?�����! 6�/+">-0 2; 2; 2; � �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0 13$!D=�!"����,�<��? 6 ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;��%*=����+��"����%�,� 1�� 2$4 2$� 1�1 2�4 2$� $%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� 133 14� 14$ 135 253 14$ $"*=�-��� �/-0 2;$ 2;$ �;$ 5;3 5;� �;$ 5;3 5;�"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 �;� �;� 1;3 2; 1;1 1;3 2; 1;1! �E, , �+� �: �� $ $ � $ $ $ $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 $5$� $$51 33� 3�� 553 1�1 3�� $ 41

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ &'�� &'�1 �'�$.�,� ���" $� 1� $35 $5�.�,� �( +" $� .�,� �����" $35 ���@ $5$� $� $� 31$.�,� �"��*!��"� ; $ ;�1 ; � ;1$F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 $ 1�*��"���� ��/-0 �;� ; ; $2;�(� �(�� � '�!!������ ��/-0 ;� $2;��!!�����(�� '

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� 1;2��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 32;�: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: E.2nd Street & E. Front StreetRoute 62 Corridor Smart Transportation Study � �����1�� �)�-���"��&-"���6��%

#�� �������������� !��"

��% � �" &'( &'� �'( �'� �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 2 24 24 2 $ 14� �����*��"�� �"�! 7� 7� 9�6 �1: 1: �1:� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�1 ;�1 ;4$ ;4$ ;�� ;��@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 2 3� 3� 2�3 2$3 � 6 -"���-(� �)�6"��/+"0)?�����! 6�/+">-0� �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� $ �� 2$3 2$3%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� $ �� 2$3 2$3"*=�-��� �/-0 5;2 5;� 2;$"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 1;3 1;1 �;�! �E, , �+� �: �4 �� �3����!��"��/% �>�0 �21 51$ $$14

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ &'�� �'�$ �'�� �'�$.�,� ���" 2 3� 3� 2�3 2$3.�,� �( +" 2 3� .�,� �����" 3� ��@ �21 51$ $$14 $� $� .�,� �"��*!��"� ; � ; 4 ; 3 ;�� ;�2F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 $ � 2 *��"���� ��/-0 � ;$ $$;� 4;1 ; ; (� �(�� * ' ��!!������ ��/-0 $$;� ;� ; �!!�����(�� '

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� $;$��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 15;4: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Imperial Street & E. Front StreetRoute 62 Corridor Smart Transportation Study � �����1�� �)�-���"��&-"���6��%

#�� �������������� !��"

��% � �" &'( &'� �'( �'� �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 $$ $� $ 2 2 1� 5�����*��"�� �"�! 7� 7� 9�6 : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;52 ;52 ;4� ;4� ;45 ;45@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 $� $� $ 2�1 21 �� 6 -"���-(� �)�6"��/+"0)?�����! 6�/+">-0� �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� ��� 212 21�%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� ��� 212 21�"*=�-��� �/-0 5;2 5;� 2;$"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 1;3 1;1 �;�! �E, , �+� �: �2 �� $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 ��� 5�5 $$$�

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ �'�$ �'�� �'�$.�,� ���" 15 $ 2�1 21�.�,� �( +" $� $ .�,� �����" $� ���@ 2$$ $$$� $� $� .�,� �"��*!��"� ; � ; ;�� ;�5F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 � *��"���� ��/-0 $2;5 4;� ; ; (� �(�� ' ��!!������ ��/-0 $2;5 ; ; �!!�����(�� '

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� ;5��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 1$;1: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: E. Front Street & Wilson AvenueRoute 62 Corridor Smart Transportation Study � �����1�� �)�-���"��&-"���6��%

#�� �������������� !��"

��% � �" &'� &'� )'( )'� �'( �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 2$3 $3� �����*��"�� 7� 7� �"�!9�6 : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�� ;�� ;�5 ;�5 ;�$ ;�$@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 325 ��2 � 6 -"���- $(� �)�6"��/+"0 $�; )?�����! 6�/+">-0 2; � �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0 143!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� $ 32� $%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� $ 32� $"*=�-��� �/-0 2;$ 5;2 5;�"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 �;� 1;3 1;1! �E, , �+� �: $ 33 $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 $5� 2�2 $ ��

��� �"���=�(� �B )'�$ �'�$.�,� ���" 325 ��2.�,� �( +" ��2.�,� �����" ��@ $� 2�2.�,� �"��*!��"� ;1� ;23F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 34*��"���� ��/-0 ; $4;�(� �(�� *�!!������ ��/-0 ; $4;��!!�����(�� *

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� 3;1��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 3�;5: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � '���-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: E. 1st Street & Wilson AvenueRoute 62 Corridor Smart Transportation Study � �����1�� �)�-���"��&;��6

#�� �������������� !��"

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 �4 244 �53 �3� � �����*��"�� 7� 7� �"�! �"�!9�6 : : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�3 ;�3 ;�3 ;�� ;�� ;�� ;4$ ;4$ ;4$ ;�� ;�� ;��@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 �� 3$2 ��� 1$� � � 6 -"���- 3 2 2(� �)�6"��/+"0 $�; ; $�; )?�����! 6�/+">-0 2; 2; 2; � �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0 13$!D=�!"����,�<��? 6 ;4� ;4� ;4� ;4� ;4� ;4�%*=����+��"����%�,� 3$4 34� 3�� 3�� �14 3�� 3%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� 1 4 145 14 1$1 3�3 14 3"*=�-��� �/-0 2;$ 2;$ �;$ 5;3 5;� �;$ 5;3 5;�"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 �;� �;� 1;3 2; 1;1 1;3 2; 1;1! �E, , �+� �: �4 $ $ �� $ $ $ $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 $51 $ �� 25� 22� 3�� $2� 225 $ �2

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ &'�� &'�1 �'�$.�,� ���" �� 5 � $45 1� .�,� �( +" �� .�,� �����" �1 $45 ���@ $51 $� $� 224.�,� �"��*!��"� ; � ;15 ;$$ ;�$F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 $ $1�*��"���� ��/-0 �;� ; ; 1 ;�(� �(�� � ��!!������ ��/-0 ;1 1 ;��!!�����(�� �

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� 4;4��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� �1;5: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: E.2nd Street & E. Front StreetRoute 62 Corridor Smart Transportation Study � �����1�� �)�-���"��&;��6

#�� �������������� !��"

��% � �" &'( &'� �'( �'� �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 2 4� 4� 211 242 5�����*��"�� �"�! 7� 7� 9�6 �1: 1: �1:� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;5� ;5� ;�� ;�� ;4� ;4�@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 5 $$� �� 2�$ 335 �� 6 -"���-(� �)�6"��/+"0)?�����! 6�/+">-0� �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� $��2 35 351%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� $��2 35 351"*=�-��� �/-0 5;2 5;� 2;$"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 1;3 1;1 �;�! �E, , �+� �: �� �4 � ����!��"��/% �>�0 $4$ 31� $ $1

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ &'�� �'�$ �'�� �'�$.�,� ���" 5 $$� �� 2�$ 351.�,� �( +" 5 �� .�,� �����" $$� ���@ $4$ 31� $ $1 $� $� .�,� �"��*!��"� ; 1 ;�� ;$ ;�4 ;11F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 � �$ 4 *��"���� ��/-0 �3;3 $1;� 4;� ; ; (� �(�� � ' ��!!������ ��/-0 $2;1 $;3 ; �!!�����(�� '

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� �;$��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 22;$: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Imperial Street & E. Front StreetRoute 62 Corridor Smart Transportation Study � �����1�� �)�-���"��&;��6

#�� �������������� !��"

��% � �" &'( &'� �'( �'� �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 15 $4 $ 2�� 2�� $1�����*��"�� �"�! 7� 7� 9�6 : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�$ ;�$ ;44 ;44 ;�1 ;�1@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 3$ �3 $$ 243 3 4 $2� 6 -"���-(� �)�6"��/+"0)?�����! 6�/+">-0� �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� $ �� 3$3 3��%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� $ �� 3$3 3��"*=�-��� �/-0 5;2 5;� 2;$"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 1;3 1;1 �;�! �E, , �+� �: 4$ �5 ������!��"��/% �>�0 �5$ 352 $ 23

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ �'�$ �'�� �'�$.�,� ���" �5 $$ 243 3��.�,� �( +" 3$ $$ .�,� �����" �3 $2��@ 1$4 $ 23 $� $� .�,� �"��*!��"� ;�2 ; $ ;�� ;1$F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 �1 $ *��"���� ��/-0 $�;� 4;3 ; ; (� �(�� * ��!!������ ��/-0 $�;� ;� ; �!!�����(�� *

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� $;3��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 13;5: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: E. Front Street & Wilson AvenueRoute 62 Corridor Smart Transportation Study � �����1�� �)�-���"��&;��6

#�� �������������� !��"

��% � �" &'� &'� )'( )'� �'( �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 251 �43 �����*��"�� 7� 7� �"�!9�6 : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�� ;�� ;� ;� ;42 ;42@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 3$2 11� � 6 -"���-(� �)�6"��/+"0)?�����! 6�/+">-0� �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0 2 5!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� 3$2 %*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� 3$2 "*=�-��� �/-0 2;$ 5;2 5;�"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 �;� 1;3 1;1! �E, , �+� �: $ 13 $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 $5�1 3�� $ 44

��� �"���=�(� �B )'�$ �'�$.�,� ���" 3$2 11�.�,� �( +" 11�.�,� �����" ��@ $� 3��.�,� �"��*!��"� ;1 ;53F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 $$5*��"���� ��/-0 ; �1;4(� �(�� *�!!������ ��/-0 ; �1;4�!!�����(�� *

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� �;3��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� ��;4: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

����������������������

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: E. 1st Street & Wilson AvenueRoute 62 Corridor Smart Transportation Study � 1 ����1�� �)�-���"��&-"���6��%

#�� �������������� !��"

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 $� 1�2 $3 $2� � �����*��"�� 7� 7� �"�! �"�!9�6 : : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�5 ;�5 ;�5 ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;�� ;��@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 $2 21� $�1 $�� � � 6 -"���- $ $ �(� �)�6"��/+"0 $�; ; $�; )?�����! 6�/+">-0 2; 2; 2; � �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0 13$!D=�!"����,�<��? 6 ;�2 ;�2 ;�2 ;�2 ;�2 ;�2%*=����+��"����%�,� 212 251 25� 213 33� 25� $%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� 1�� 2 � 2 $ 1�1 2�� 2 $ $"*=�-��� �/-0 2;$ 2;$ �;$ 5;3 5;� �;$ 5;3 5;�"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 �;� �;� 1;3 2; 1;1 1;3 2; 1;1! �E, , �+� �: �� $ $ 53 $ $ $ $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 $5$� $$$� 3�� 3 � 513 1�4 3 � $ 41

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ &'�� &'�1 �'�$.�,� ���" $2 21� $�1 $4 .�,� �( +" $2 .�,� �����" $�1 ���@ $5$� $� $� 3 2.�,� �"��*!��"� ; $ ;�3 ;$ ;15F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 $ 2 *��"���� ��/-0 �;� ; ; $5;$(� �(�� � *�!!������ ��/-0 ;� $5;$�!!�����(�� *

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� 1;���" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 3�;5: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � '���-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: E.2nd Street & E. Front StreetRoute 62 Corridor Smart Transportation Study � 1 ����1�� �)�-���"��&-"���6��%

#�� �������������� !��"

��% � �" &'( &'� �'( �'� �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 2 24 24 2 $ 14� �����*��"�� �"�! 7� 7� 9�6 �1: 1: �1:� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�1 ;�1 ;4$ ;4$ ;�� ;��@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 3 3� 55 33 25$ � 6 -"���-(� �)�6"��/+"0)?�����! 6�/+">-0� �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� $$2� 25$ 25$%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� $$2� 25$ 25$"*=�-��� �/-0 5;2 5;� 2;$"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 1;3 1;1 �;�! �E, , �+� �: �4 � �2����!��"��/% �>�0 � 5 3�3 $ �3

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ &'�� �'�$ �'�� �'�$.�,� ���" 3 3� 55 33 25$.�,� �( +" 3 55 .�,� �����" 3� ��@ � 5 3�3 $ �3 $� $� .�,� �"��*!��"� ; � ;$ ; 5 ;1� ;��F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 � 4 3 *��"���� ��/-0 ��;� $$;� 4;3 ; ; (� �(�� * ' ��!!������ ��/-0 $�;5 ;� ; �!!�����(�� '

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� $;���" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 1�; : �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Imperial Street & E. Front StreetRoute 62 Corridor Smart Transportation Study � 1 ����1�� �)�-���"��&-"���6��%

#�� �������������� !��"

��% � �" &'( &'� �'( �'� �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 $$ $� $ 2 2 1� 5�����*��"�� �"�! 7� 7� 9�6 : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;52 ;52 ;4� ;4� ;45 ;45@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 $� �$ $ 32� 2�4 4� 6 -"���-(� �)�6"��/+"0)?�����! 6�/+">-0� �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� $ 1$ 24$ 243%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� $ 1$ 24$ 243"*=�-��� �/-0 5;2 5;� 2;$"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 1;3 1;1 �;�! �E, , �+� �: �1 �5 $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 �5 34� $ 5�

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ �'�$ �'�� �'�$.�,� ���" 2 $ 32� 243.�,� �( +" $� $ .�,� �����" �$ 4��@ 15� $ 5� $� $� .�,� �"��*!��"� ;$$ ; ;1� ;��F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 � *��"���� ��/-0 $5; 4;2 ; ; (� �(�� * ��!!������ ��/-0 $5; ; ; �!!�����(�� *

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� ;5��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 11;5: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: E. Front Street & Wilson AvenueRoute 62 Corridor Smart Transportation Study � 1 ����1�� �)�-���"��&-"���6��%

#�� �������������� !��"

��% � �" &'� &'� )'( )'� �'( �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 2$3 $3� �����*��"�� 7� 7� �"�!9�6 : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�� ;�� ;�5 ;�5 ;�$ ;�$@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 5 5 �2� � 6 -"���- $(� �)�6"��/+"0 $�; )?�����! 6�/+">-0 2; � �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0 143!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� $ 5 � $%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� $ 5 � $"*=�-��� �/-0 2;$ 5;2 5;�"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 �;� 1;3 1;1! �E, , �+� �: $ 23 $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 $5� 235 $ ��

��� �"���=�(� �B )'�$ �'�$.�,� ���" 5 5 �2�.�,� �( +" �2�.�,� �����" ��@ $� 235.�,� �"��*!��"� ;15 ;33F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 4 *��"���� ��/-0 ; ��; (� �(�� *�!!������ ��/-0 ; ��; �!!�����(�� *

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� 5;2��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 53; : �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � *���-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: E. 1st Street & Wilson AvenueRoute 62 Corridor Smart Transportation Study � 1 ����1�� �)�-���"��&-"���6��%

#�� �������������� !��"

��% � �" &'( &'� &'� )'( )'� )'� �'( �'� �'� �'( �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 �4 244 �53 �3� � �����*��"�� 7� 7� �"�! �"�!9�6 : : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�3 ;�3 ;�3 ;�� ;�� ;�� ;4$ ;4$ ;4$ ;�� ;�� ;��@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 11 3� 1$ 13� 1 � 6 -"���- 3 2 2(� �)�6"��/+"0 $�; ; $�; )?�����! 6�/+">-0 2; 2; 2; � �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0 13$!D=�!"����,�<��? 6 ;4$ ;4$ ;4$ ;4$ ;4$ ;4$%*=����+��"����%�,� 3�2 523 52 3�4 4$4 52 3%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� 135 221 21� 15$ 534 21� 3"*=�-��� �/-0 2;$ 2;$ �;$ 5;3 5;� �;$ 5;3 5;�"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 �;� �;� 1;3 2; 1;1 1;3 2; 1;1! �E, , �+� �: �4 $ $ $1 $ $ $ $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 $51 �� 2$3 2 � 331 �� 2 5 $ �2

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ &'�� &'�1 �'�$.�,� ���" 11 3� 1$ 133.�,� �( +" 11 .�,� �����" 1$ 1��@ $51 $� $� 2 4.�,� �"��*!��"� ; � ;12 ;$4 ;4�F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 � �$4*��"���� ��/-0 �;1 ; ; 3 ;2(� �(�� � 7�!!������ ��/-0 ;1 3 ;2�!!�����(�� 7

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� $2;1��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� �3;2: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: E.2nd Street & E. Front StreetRoute 62 Corridor Smart Transportation Study � 1 ����1�� �)�-���"��&-"���6��%

#�� �������������� !��"

��% � �" &'( &'� �'( �'� �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 2 4� 4� 211 242 5�����*��"�� �"�! 7� 7� 9�6 �1: 1: �1:� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;5� ;5� ;�� ;�� ;4� ;4�@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 5 $1� $ � 3�� 5$4 4� 6 -"���-(� �)�6"��/+"0)?�����! 6�/+">-0� �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� $13� 5�$ 5�3%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� $13� 5�$ 5�3"*=�-��� �/-0 5;2 5;� 2;$"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 1;3 1;1 �;�! �E, , �+� �: �5 �1 4�����!��"��/% �>�0 $2� 2�$ �5$

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ &'�� �'�$ �'�� �'�$.�,� ���" 5 $1� $ � 3�� 5�3.�,� �( +" 5 $ � .�,� �����" $1� 4��@ $2� 2�$ �5$ $� $� .�,� �"��*!��"� ; 2 ;�� ;$$ ;1$ ;1�F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 1 �� � *��"���� ��/-0 1 ;3 $3; �;� ; ; (� �(�� � * ��!!������ ��/-0 $3;� $;5 ; �!!�����(�� *

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� �;1��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 2�;3: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Imperial Street & E. Front StreetRoute 62 Corridor Smart Transportation Study � 1 ����1�� �)�-���"��&-"���6��%

#�� �������������� !��"

��% � �" &'( &'� �'( �'� �'� �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 15 $4 $ 2�� 2�� $1�����*��"�� �"�! 7� 7� 9�6 : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�$ ;�$ ;44 ;44 ;�1 ;�1@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 35 �4 $1 31� 351 $5� 6 -"���-(� �)�6"��/+"0)?�����! 6�/+">-0� �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� $$13 3�$ 3��%*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� $$13 3�$ 3��"*=�-��� �/-0 5;2 5;� 2;$"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 1;3 1;1 �;�! �E, , �+� �: �3 �3 ������!��"��/% �>�0 ��1 3�2 ��3

��� �"���=�(� �B &'�$ �'�$ �'�� �'�$.�,� ���" 42 $1 31� 3��.�,� �( +" 35 $1 .�,� �����" �4 $5��@ ��5 ��3 $� $� .�,� �"��*!��"� ;1$ ; $ ;1� ;12F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 1$ $ *��"���� ��/-0 �1;� 4;� ; ; (� �(�� * ��!!������ ��/-0 �1;� ;� ; �!!�����(�� *

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� $;���" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 14;5: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � ����-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: E. Front Street & Wilson AvenueRoute 62 Corridor Smart Transportation Study � 1 ����1�� �)�-���"��&-"���6��%

#�� �������������� !��"

��% � �" &'� &'� )'( )'� �'( �'�(� �*��+��,�"���-.�,� �/% �>�0 251 �43 �����*��"�� 7� 7� �"�!9�6 : : :� ?�@�,��7�"�� ;�� ;�� ;� ;� ;42 ;42@�,���+�8��" �/%!�0 3�$ 1�� � 6 -"���-(� �)�6"��/+"0)?�����! 6�/+">-0� �� �"�'��?� ����"�",���+� �/% �0� 6���"�! ��� ��� � 6���-"��� �% �0�!-"� ��-����/+"0 143!D=�!"����,�<��? 6%*=����+��"����%�,� 3�$ %*$=�-"� �$����+�%�%*�=�-"� ������+�%�%*,=�,�<��? 6�%� 3�$ "*=�-��� �/-0 2;$ 5;2 5;�"*=���-"� �/-0"7�/-0 �;� 1;3 1;1! �E, , �+� �: $ �� $ ����!��"��/% �>�0 $5�1 242 $ 44

��� �"���=�(� �B )'�$ �'�$.�,� ���" 3�$ 1��.�,� �( +" 1��.�,� �����" ��@ $� 242.�,� �"��*!��"� ;12 ;�4F, , �( ��"���3"��/+"0 $�1*��"���� ��/-0 ; 11;�(� �(�� ��!!������ ��/-0 ; 11;��!!�����(�� �

��" �- �"�����,�����% �� �� �� $1;3��" �- �"����*!��"���"��C"���� 42;$: �*��( % ��+�� �%�� � &���-�-�� ���6�/���0 $3

Appendix E

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor Study Final Report October 2010

Appendix E: Synchro HCM Reports

��������������� �� ����� ������������� ��� ����������� ��� ����� �������������� ������������������������������������ � !!"#������$���

��������������� ��!"���#$���%&'"%������ ��!"�����"���� '�(��%�� �������%���������&�� �����# ��"� ��'�' �()* �� ��'+� ,����-�����.�'�,��� /! 0%�� ����1���� ����� !/(��+ �,��,����� ��2���,��� 3/( 0�11�,�����4��� ��,�����2���,��� *�� ��'�'

2��� ���%����� �����# �/5� ��'6'�' /!* �� �6'�'2��� ���%����� ��� ���# */ ��, */ ��,2��� ���%����� �� ���7���# ��/5 ��,2��� ���%����� �� ���8�������# ��/5 ��, ��/5 ��,7������1�� ��,�� ��� /�4��/�%����# 79��7������1�� ��,�� �� ���8�������# 79�:7������1�� ��,�� �� ���7���# 79�:

"*0�:�,;��1�<�����6�.�'�,���� �� ���7���# (/* ��'"*0�:�,;��1�<�����6�%�����,�� �� ���7���# ��)/( 1��������11�,��������� *)3 ��'�' �(� �� ��'�11�,������������� !/(* �� ���' !/(* �� ��� �+ ��� �����<����� !/)! !/)!+� 1� ���,��4���� �/* �/*

� �����%�����,�� �����# (3/) ��'6���' *�)/" �� �6���'� �����%�����,�� ��� ���# �3"� 1� �3"� 1�� ���������� �����# ��/) ��'6'�' �"/* �� �6'�'� ���������� ��� ���# ("/! ��, ("/! ��,� ��������� �/) ��' �/) ��'

2���� �����# ((/5* =�' ((/5* =�'�����2����������� �����# �"/! ����'2� $���%������� �����# �3!/) ;��'-�� �,� $���� �����# !/"! ;��'2� $���8�������� �����# �/)( ;��'>9�� �����# !/)53 ;��'

79� ��� /�4��/�%����#�1� �.�'�,�������$����������� ����������1� �������'�,������������/��79�8��'��?�%����� -28#/��79�8��'���1� ��������������'�,����������������������?�%����� -28#/��������$����79�8��'��?������������������4��� ��,�����/������$����2���,����8����?�4%�������� �/

��������������� ��!"���# ���"%'"%������ ��!"�����"���� '�(��%�� �������%���������&�� �����# *5)@"�) ��'�� �33@�"� �� ���%���� 3� ��'6'�� "3� �� �6'���11�,��������� *3@�! ��'�� )!"@"� �� ���� �����%�����,� !*@*5) ��'6���� (�@�35 �� �6����� ��������� 5@3!" ��'6'�� "@)5� �� �6'��

2��� ��5@(3! =�� ��5@(3! =�������2���������� "@�(! �����2� $���%������ 3�@*�� ;���-�� �,� $��� �)" ;���2� $���8������� *@"( ;���>9� �3� ;���

+ �,�����?�� ����@������$� ��!@�!�!�)?�5?�3�+84%���4>����2�49>�(/!/�"/��!(

2��� ��'��A!!!6!�!��;,���;�B�����,������+���7��&&&/��� ����������/,��

+ �C�,�?� 2?D%�,������������������D��'� D%��;���D+� �����D+ �C�,��D��������4%��D�������/���3!!!"(@�E9->9>�84�84��>�B��-98+9>@�4>F7�

������������� ���� ������������������������������� ��� ����� �������������� ������������������������������������ � !!"#������$���

���������������� �!��"���#�!$�%"%&�'�()��*�+����

,���-. �� �.�����

����/�� 01.��2����

��� ����.������

3������*�� ��(�

4 ��2��+�����

�**�(�������������

��� ����������1�5�(��� .�����(�

��5�5 & ��( ��( ��5 *� �� ���5 ��5���56��������������

73 3 ��! 2! !2 ��28 39�' �2% 7:2 !2�� !28� 2!:� � 2! !2�8 82; 39�� �2% 7:2 !2�� !2�% 2"

��� ��(5 �� 2! !2 ��28 39�' �2% 7:2 !2�� !28� 2!

����6���� ����� ����� � ;%� 2! !2;�� �2% 39�� ;2% ��72; !2%8 !2%8 7�27

��� ��(5 ;%� 2! !2;�� �2% 39�� ;2% ��72; !2%8 !2%8 7�27

����6�������� ���%3 3 �7 2! !2%� �!2� 39�' !2! !2! !2!! �2!% 2"� � ;!8 2! !2;: 2; 39�� !2! !2! !2!! !28 %2;� � ��7 2! !2!"8 �2� 39�� !2! !2! !2!! !2� ;2

��� ��(5 %:7 2! !2;: 27 39�' !2! !2! !2!! !28 %2!

����1�5�(��� ��"� 2! !2;�� %2 39�� ;2% ��72; !27! !2;% �27

3������*�� ��(�� ��� 2�-��2�.����#6�39��2��'����������� ����������*� �������5�(������������2��39 ,��5��6�.����� 0<,#2��3������*�� ��(�� �� ���,�������#6�39�'2��39�,��5���*� ��������������5�(������������6�.����� 0<,#2����� ��(5�39��������� ��$���������5��/� ���������*� �������5�(�����������2������$����39�,��5��6������������������-��� ��(�����2������$����<���(����,����6�-.�������� �2

4 �(�����6�� ����=������$� ��!=�!�!�76�86�:�4,-.���->����<�-9>�;2!2�"2��!;

<��� ��5��?!!!@!�!��)(���)�A�����(������4���3��///2��� ����������2(��

4 �B�(�6� <6C.�(������������������C��5� C.��)���C4� �����C4 �B�(��C��������-.��C�������2���:!!!";=�D90>9>�,-�,-��>�A��09,49>=�->E3�

��������������� �� ����� ����������������� ����������� ��� ����� �������������� ������������������������������������ � !!"#������$���

��������������� ��!"���#$���%&'"%������ ��!"�����"���� '�(��%�� �������%���������&�� �����# ��'( ��)�) �"�! �� ��)*� +����,�����-�)�+��� .! /%�� ����0���� ����� !.�'"* �+��+����� ��1���+��� ''.� /�00�+�����2��� ��+�����1���+��� 334 ��)�)

1��� ���%����� �����# '.�" ��)5)�) '.4 �� �5)�)1��� ���%����� ��� ���# 6.! ��+ 6.! ��+1��� ���%����� �� ���7���# �(.4 ��+1��� ���%����� �� ���8�������# �(.4 ��+ �(.4 ��+7������0�� ��+�� ��� .�2��.�%����# 79��7������0�� ��+�� �� ���8�������# 79�:7������0�� ��+�� �� ���7���# 79�:

"3/�:�+;��0�<�����5�-�)�+���� �� ���7���# 6." ��)"3/�:�+;��0�<�����5�%�����+�� �� ���7���# !�.3 0��������00�+��������� " ��)�) ��!6 �� ��)�00�+������������� !.3� �� ���) !.3� �� ��� �* ��� �����<����� !.'" !.'"*� 0� ���+��2���� ''. ''.

� �����%�����+�� �����# 344.� ��)5���) 6!�.' �� �5���)� �����%�����+�� ��� ���# �"! 0� �"! 0�� ���������� �����# '.( ��)5)�) 4.� �� �5)�)� ���������� ��� ���# 3�.� ��+ 3�.� ��+� ��������� 3.� ��) 3.� ��)

1���� �����# '3�.�" =�) '3�.�" =�)�����1����������� �����# 6.' ����)1� $���%������� �����# 34.� ;��),�� �+� $���� �����# !.(� ;��)1� $���8�������� �����# �4.'6 ;��)>9�� �����# !.3(3 ;��)

79� ��� .�2��.�%����#�0� �-�)�+�������$����������� ����������0� �������)�+������������.��79�8��)��?�%����� ,18#.��79�8��)���0� ��������������)�+����������������������?�%����� ,18#.��������$����79�8��)��?������������������2��� ��+�����.������$����1���+����8����?�2%�������� �.

��������������� ��!"���# ���"%'"%������ ��!"�����"���� '�(��%�� �������%���������&�� �����# 64(@�6( ��)�� "(�@!!" �� ���%���� �@3" ��)5)�� �@4'3 �� �5)���00�+��������� ((@�'! ��)�� 3'�@�33 �� ���� �����%�����+� 4@3!" ��)5���� ''"@!�� �� �5����� ��������� ��@( ��)5)�� �'@("� �� �5)��

1��� ��4@4!" =�� ��4@4!" =�������1���������� �'@!4! �����1� $���%������ �'@44� ;���,�� �+� $��� ! ;���1� $���8������� 4@4�" ;���>9� � ;���

* �+�����?�� ����@������$� ��!@�!�!�'?�6?�"�*82%���2>����1�29>�(.!.�".��!(

1��� ��)��A!!!5!�!��;+���;�B�����+������*���7��&&&.��� ����������.+��

* �C�+�?� 1?D%�+������������������D��)� D%��;���D*� �����D* �C�+��D��������2%��D�������.���4!!!"(@�E9,>9>�82�82��>�B��,98*9>@�2>F7�

������������� ���� ������������������������������� ��� ����� �������������� ������������������������������������ � !!"#������$���

���������������� �!��"���#�!$�%"%&�'�()��*�+����

,���-. �� �.�����

����/�� 01.��2����

��� ����.������

3������*�� ��(�

4 ��2��+�����

�**�(�������������

��� ����������1�5�(��� .�����(�

��5�5 & ��( ��( ��5 *� �� ���5 ��5���56��������������

73 3 8" 2! !297" �92: 3;�' 72� "�2! !28� !2"7 !2":� � 2! !297% �!2% 3;�' 72� "�2! !28� !2:� �28

��� ��(5 : 2! !297: �92: 3;�' 72� "�2! !28� !2"7 �2!

����6���� ����� ����� � %!7 2! !2�7" �!2% 3;�' 82" !�2% !2:7 !2:9 "2%

��� ��(5 %!7 2! !2�7" �!2% 3;�' 82" !�2% !2:7 !2:9 "2%

����6�������� ���%3 3 7! 2! !277� �!2� 3;�' !2! !2! !2!! �2!9 2"� � %7! 2! !277 29 3;�� !2! !2! !2!! !28 %29� � :: 2! !2�8� �2� 3;�� !2! !2! !2!! !2� 92

��� ��(5 :9" 2! !277 29 3;�' !2! !2! !2!! !2: 92"

����1�5�(��� ��79 2! !2�7" 82! 3;�� 82" !�2% !27" !2%� %2�

3������*�� ��(�� ��� 2�-��2�.����#6�3;��2��'����������� ����������*� �������5�(������������2��3; ,��5��6�.����� 0<,#2��3������*�� ��(�� �� ���,�������#6�3;�'2��3;�,��5���*� ��������������5�(������������6�.����� 0<,#2����� ��(5�3;��������� ��$���������5��/� ���������*� �������5�(�����������2������$����3;�,��5��6������������������-��� ��(�����2������$����<���(����,����6�-.�������� �2

4 �(�����6�� ����=������$� ��!=�!�!�76�86�"�4,-.���->����<�-;>�92!2�"2��!9

<��� ��5��?!!!@!�!��)(���)�A�����(������4���3��///2��� ����������2(��

4 �B�(�6� <6C.�(������������������C��5� C.��)���C4� �����C4 �B�(��C��������-.��C�������2���:!!!"9=�D;0>;>�,-�,-��>�A��0;,4;>=�->E3�

��������������� �� ����� ������������� ��� ����������� ��� ����� �������������� ���������������������������� ����� ��� !"������#���

������� �������!��"#� �$%���&'(#&������!��"#� ���#���� (�)� &�� �������$���������%��������" � & ��'�' �!( �� ��')� *����+�����,�'�*��� -� .$�/ ����0���� ����� �-! �) �*��*����� ��1���*��� ��-! .�00�*�����2��� ��*�����1���*��� !�� ��'�'

1��� ���$�����������" �-(3 ��'4'�' - & �� �4'�'1��� ���$��������� �/�" !-5 ��* !-5 ��*1��� ���$�������� ���6���" �- ��*1��� ���$�������� ���7�������" �- ��* �- ��*6������0�� ��*������ -�2��-�$����" 68��6������0�� ��*����� ���7�������" 68�96������0�� ��*����� ���6���" 68�9

(!.�9�*:��0�;�����4�,�'�*������� ���6���" !-5 ��'(!.�9�*:��0�;�����4�$�����*����� ���6���" � �-! 0��������00�*��������� � ��'�' &5� �� ��'�00�*������������� �-5& �� ���' �-5& �� ��� �) ��� �����;����� �- �- )� 0� ���*��2���< 5- 5-

� �����$�����*��������" 5&!- ��'4���' !&�-5 �� �4���'� �����$�����*������ �/�" �3(� 0� �3(� 0�� ����������������" �3-� ��'4'�' �-3 �� �4'�'� �������������� �/�" 5(- ��* 5(- ��*� ��������� �- ��' �- ��'

1����������" & -� =�' & -� =�'�����1�����������������" �- /���'1� #���$��<����������" ��- :/�'+�� �*� #����������" �- 5 :/�'1� #���7���<����������" � -3! :/�'>8<�������" �-5 :/�'

68����� -�2��-�$����"�0� �,�'�*�������#����������� �/��������0� �������'�*������������-��68�7��'��?�$������+17"-��68�7��'���0� ��������������'�*����������������������?�$������+17"-��������#����68�7��'��?���������/��������2��� ��*�����-������#����1���*����7����?�2$�������� �-

������� �������!��"#� �$ ���#&(#&������!��"#� ���#���� (�)� &�� �������$���������%��������" � &@�5 ��'�� &�5@5! �� ���$���� (5( ��'4'�� �@� ( �� �4'���00�*��������� (3@ 5� ��'�� !3@��3 �� ���� �����$�����*� 3@��� ��'4���� & @&( �� �4����� ��������� 3@&�3 ��'4'�� ��@5!� �� �4'��

1��� � �@�5( =�� � �@�5( =�������1���������� ��@�� /����1� #���$��<��� (�@��� :/��+�� �*� #��� �!� :/��1� #���7���<��� �@�!� :/��>8< � :/��

) �*�����?�� ����@������#� ���@����� ?�&?��)72$���2>����1�28>�5-�-�(-���5

1��� �/'��A���4�����:*���:�B�����*������)���6��%%%-��� ����������-*��

) �C�*�?� 1?D$�*����������������/�D��'� D$��:���D)� �����D) �C�*��D��������2$��D�������-���3���(5@�E8+>8>�72�72��>�B��+87)8>@�2>F6�

������������� ���� ������������������������������� ��� ����� �������������� ���������������������������� ����� ��� !"������#���

������������ ���!�"��#���$�"%�&$!%�&�'(��)�*����

+���,- �� �-���������.�� /0

-�12����

��� �1��-������

3������)�� ��'�

4 ��2��*�����

�))�'�������������

��� �1��������0�5�'��� -�����'�

��5�5 % ��' ��' ��5 )� �� ���5 ��5���56��������������

3 3 �77 2� �2!� �2 38�& �29 ::29 �2�: �27$ �299� � 2� �27 92� 38�� �29 ::29 �2�: �2�9 2�

��� ��'5 �7$ 2� �2!� �2 38�& �29 ::29 �2�: �27$ �29

����6���� ����� ����� � !�� 2� �2! � �29 38�� !2: � �2! �2�: �2�� �2�

��� ��'5 !�� 2� �2! � �29 38�� !2: � �2! �2�: �2�� �2�

����6�������� ���!3 3 �: 2� �277 ��2� 38�& �2� �2� �2�� �2�! 2$� � :!� 2� �27� 2: 38�� �2� �2� �2�� �27 !2:� � �9 2� �2��7 �2� 38�� �2� �2� �2�� �2� :2

��� ��'5 �:7 2� �27! 2 38�& �2� �2� �2�� �27 !2�

����0�5�'��� � 7 2� �2! � !2: 38�� !2: � �2! �2 �2:7 �2

3������)�� ��'������ 2�,��2�-����"6�38��2��&����������� �1��������)� �������5�'������������2��38 +��5��6�-������/;+"2��3������)�� ��'����� ���+�������"6�38�&2��38�+��5���)� ��������������5�'������������6�-������/;+"2����� ��'5�38��������� ��#���������5��.� ���������)� �������5�'�����������2������#����38�+��5��6���������1��������,��� ��'�����2������#����;���'����+����6�,-�������� �2

4 �'�����6�� ����<������#� ���<����� 6�76��4+,-���,=����;�,8=�:2�2�$2���:

;��� �15��>���?�����('���(�@�����'������4���3��...2��� ����������2'��

4 �A�'�6� ;6B-�'����������������1�B��5� B-��(���B4� �����B4 �A�'��B��������,-��B�������2���9���$:<�C8/=8=�+,�+,��=�@��/8+48=<�,=D3�

��������������� �� ����� ����������������� ����������� ��� ����� �������������� ���������������������������� ����� ��� !"������#���

������� �������!��"#� �$%���&'(#&������!��"#� ���#���� (�)� &�� �������$���������%��������" �&� ��'�' �(� �� ��')� *����+�����,�'�*��� -� .$�/ ����0���� ����� �-(1�) �*��*����� ��2���*��� �1-3 .�00�*�����4��� ��*�����2���*��� 1!� ��'�'

2��� ���$�����������" 1-� ��'5'�' !-�� �� �5'�'2��� ���$��������� �/�" &-! ��* &-! ��*2��� ���$�������� ���6���" �(- ��*2��� ���$�������� ���7�������" �(-1 ��* �(-1 ��*6������0�� ��*������ -�4��-�$����" 68��6������0�� ��*����� ���7�������" 68�96������0�� ��*����� ���6���" 68�9

3!.�9�*:��0�;�����5�,�'�*������� ���6���" ��- ��'3!.�9�*:��0�;�����5�$�����*����� ���6���" &�-& 0��������00�*��������� ��1 ��'�' � (� �� ��'�00�*������������� �-� �� ���' �-� �� ��� �) ��� �����;����� �-1 �-1 )� 0� ���*��4���< 3-1 3-1

� �����$�����*��������" �! - ��'5���' (& -& �� �5���'� �����$�����*������ �/�" �3� 0� �3� 0�� ����������������" �-( ��'5'�' -� �� �5'�'� �������������� �/�" ! -� ��* ! -� ��*� ��������� 1-1 ��' 1-1 ��'

2����������" 1��-�1 =�' 1��-�1 =�'�����2�����������������" �-& /���'2� #���$��<����������" 3�-3 :/�'+�� �*� #����������" �-1(3 :/�'2� #���7���<����������" �-3& :/�'>8<�������" �-��& :/�'

68����� -�4��-�$����"�0� �,�'�*�������#����������� �/��������0� �������'�*������������-��68�7��'��?�$������+27"-��68�7��'���0� ��������������'�*����������������������?�$������+27"-��������#����68�7��'��?���������/��������4��� ��*�����-������#����2���*����7����?�4$�������� �-

������� �������!��"#� �$ ���#&(#&������!��"#� ���#���� (�)� &�� �������$���������%��������" &(�@�� ��'�� �@�11@ � �� ���$���� @�1� ��'5'�� @1!! �� �5'���00�*��������� !1&@!1! ��'�� �!&@! �� ���� �����$�����*� � @!�3 ��'5���� (�@ �� �5����� ��������� �@&! ��'5'�� �!@ 3� �� �5'��

2��� �3@��( =�� �3@��( =�������2���������� �1@(3 /����2� #���$��<��� �1�@�3! :/��+�� �*� #��� � :/��2� #���7���<��� ��@�(� :/��>8< 3( :/��

) �*�����?�� ����@������#� ���@����� ?�(?��)74$���4>����2�48>�1-�-�3-���1

2��� �/'��A���5�����:*���:�B�����*������)���6��%%%-��� ����������-*��

) �C�*�?� 2?D$�*����������������/�D��'� D$��:���D)� �����D) �C�*��D��������4$��D�������-���&���31@�E8+>8>�74�74��>�B��+87)8>@�4>F6�

������������� ���� ������������������������������� ��� ����� �������������� ���������������������������� ����� ��� !"������#���

������������ ���!�"��#���$�"%�&$!%�&�'(��)�*����

+���,- �� �-���������.�� /0

-�12����

��� �1��-������

3������)�� ��'�

4 ��2��*�����

�))�'�������������

��� �1��������0�5�'��� -�����'�

��5�5 % ��' ��' ��5 )� �� ���5 ��5���56��������������

3 3 �� 2� �2!� �728 39�& 82: ��2! �2: �2�8 �2:� � 2� �2!8 � 2� 39�& 82: ��2! �2: �2$$ �2:

��� ��'5 � 2� �2!� �72 39�& 82: ��2! �2: �2�8 �2

����6���� ����� ����� � !!$ 2� �278� � 2: 39�& ��2 :�2: �2$8 �2�� 72

��� ��'5 !!$ 2� �278� � 2: 39�& ��2 :�2: �2$8 �2�� 72

����6�������� ���!3 3 8 2� �2 7� ��2� 39�& �2� �2� �2�� �2�8 2$� � !:$ 2� �2 �$ 28 39�� �2� �2� �2�� �27 !28� � � 2� �2�:$ �2� 39�� �2� �2� �2�� �2� 82

��� ��'5 $8 2� �2 �$ 28 39�& �2� �2� �2�� �2: 82$

����0�5�'��� �:� 2� �278� :2! 39�� ��2 :�2: �28 �2� 828

3������)�� ��'������ 2�,��2�-����"6�39��2��&����������� �1��������)� �������5�'������������2��39 +��5��6�-������/;+"2��3������)�� ��'����� ���+�������"6�39�&2��39�+��5���)� ��������������5�'������������6�-������/;+"2����� ��'5�39��������� ��#���������5��.� ���������)� �������5�'�����������2������#����39�+��5��6���������1��������,��� ��'�����2������#����;���'����+����6�,-�������� �2

4 �'�����6�� ����<������#� ���<����� 6�76��4+,-���,=����;�,9=�82�2�$2���8

;��� �15��>���?�����('���(�@�����'������4���3��...2��� ����������2'��

4 �A�'�6� ;6B-�'����������������1�B��5� B-��(���B4� �����B4 �A�'��B��������,-��B�������2���:���$8<�C9/=9=�+,�+,��=�@��/9+49=<�,=D3�

Appendix F

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor Study Final Report October 2010

Appendix F: Funding Analysis

Tran

sit a

nd B

icyc

le

Age

ncy

Gra

nt/F

undi

ng R

esou

rce

Des

crip

tion

/Elig

ibili

ty

Win

dow

of O

ppor

tuni

ty

Econ

omic

Dev

elop

men

t A

dmin

istr

atio

n (E

DA

)

Plan

ning

Pro

gram

Pu

blic

Wor

ks a

nd E

cono

mic

Dev

elop

men

t Fa

cilit

ies

Prog

ram

Co

mm

unity

Infr

astr

uctu

re A

RRA

Gra

nt

Plan

ning

initi

ativ

es d

esig

ned

to c

reat

e an

d re

tain

hig

her-

skill

, hig

her-

wag

e jo

bs, i

n ec

onom

ical

ly d

istr

esse

d re

gion

s. A

ssis

t loc

al a

nd re

gion

al o

rgan

izat

ions

with

thei

r sh

ort a

nd lo

ng te

rm p

lann

ing

effo

rts.

w

ww

.eda

.gov

/PD

F/FY

09-E

DA

P-FF

O-F

INA

L.pd

f Co

nstr

uctio

n or

reha

bilit

atio

n of

ess

entia

l pub

lic in

fras

truc

ture

and

faci

litie

s

ww

w.a

rc.g

ov/i

ndex

.do?

node

Id=3

320

$246

,000

,000

app

ropr

iate

d A

pplic

atio

n de

adlin

e - J

une

30,

2011

FHW

A

Capi

tal I

nves

tmen

ts in

Sur

face

Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Infr

astr

uctu

re (A

RRA

) (T

IGER

gra

nts)

Fe

dera

l Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Fund

ing

Repl

enis

hed

the

Hig

hway

Tru

st F

und

Tran

spor

tatio

n pr

ojec

ts to

be

prov

ided

to a

Sta

te, l

ocal

gov

ernm

ent,

tran

sit a

genc

y or

col

labo

ratio

n am

ong

such

en

titie

s w

ith lo

ng-t

erm

out

com

es o

r job

cre

atio

n, in

nova

tion

and

stem

par

tner

ship

s. S

afe

Rout

es to

Sch

ools

; Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Enha

ncem

ents

; Rec

reat

iona

l Tra

ils; S

ceni

c By

way

s; a

nd th

e U

.S. B

icyc

le R

oute

Sys

tem

w

ww

.fhw

a.do

t.go

v/ec

onom

icre

cove

ry/i

ndex

.htm

w

ww

.am

eric

antr

ails

.org

/rtp

/Obe

rsta

r-tr

ansp

orta

tion-

plan

-Jun

e-20

09.h

tml

$600

,000

,000

is a

vaila

ble

thro

ugh

Sept

embe

r 30,

201

2

Cong

estio

n M

anag

emen

t and

Air

Qua

lity

Impr

ovem

ent P

rogr

am (C

MA

Q)

Proj

ects

that

red

uce

crite

ria a

ir p

ollu

tant

s re

gula

ted

from

tran

spor

tatio

n-re

late

d so

urce

s ov

er a

per

iod

of fi

ve

year

s.

$8.6

bill

ion

dolla

rs in

fund

s to

Sta

te D

OTs

, MPO

s, a

nd

tran

sit a

genc

ies

PEN

ND

OT

Urb

an T

rans

it O

pera

ting

Ass

ista

nce

Prog

ram

Fu

nd p

rovi

ded

to c

over

cos

ts in

curr

ed in

the

daily

ope

ratio

n of

loca

l pub

lic tr

ansp

orta

tion.

Th

e an

nual

am

ount

of f

undi

ng is

det

erm

ined

by

legi

slat

ive

form

ula.

U

rban

Cap

ital A

ssis

tanc

e Pr

ogra

m

Prov

ide

gran

ts to

loca

l ope

rato

rs o

f pub

lic tr

ansp

orta

tion

syst

em.

Loca

l mat

chin

g fu

nds

are

requ

ired

.

Hom

etow

n St

reet

s; S

afe

Rout

es to

Sch

ool

Impr

ove

the

qual

ity o

f life

in o

ur c

omm

uniti

es.

Stre

etsc

ape

impr

ovem

ents

for

dow

ntow

ns a

nd c

omm

erci

al

cent

ers;

and

saf

e w

alki

ng a

nd b

ikin

g pa

ssag

es to

our

sch

ools

. w

ww

.dot

.sta

te.p

a.us

/Pen

ndot

/Bur

eaus

/CPD

M/P

rod/

Safe

rout

e.ns

f/gu

idan

ce?O

penP

age

ww

w.s

mar

t-tr

ansp

orta

tion.

com

Mat

chin

g fu

nds

– ut

ilize

s fe

dera

l fun

d; m

atch

is 2

0% o

f the

to

tal p

roje

ct c

osts

.

Penn

sylv

ania

Com

mun

ity T

rans

port

atio

n In

itiat

ive

(PCT

I) (S

mar

t Tra

nspo

rtat

ion)

Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Impr

ovem

ent P

rogr

am (T

IP) s

uppo

rts

pote

ntia

l pro

ject

s th

at e

xhib

it Sm

art T

rans

port

atio

n pr

inci

ples

.

$60

mill

ion

dolla

rs o

f fed

eral

and

sta

te tr

ansp

orta

tion

fund

s w

ill b

e m

ade

avai

labl

e. P

roje

cts

may

rec

eive

up

to $

5 m

illio

n do

llars

(no

mor

e th

an $

300,

00 d

olla

rs fo

r pla

nnin

g ac

tiviti

es) f

or p

roje

cts.

App

lican

ts m

ust r

eque

st fu

nds

thro

ugh

Penn

DO

T’s

Cent

er fo

r Pro

gram

Dev

elop

men

t and

M

anag

emen

t.

Fede

ral T

rans

it

Adm

inis

trat

ion

Bus

and

Bus

Faci

litie

s; R

ail a

nd F

ixed

G

uide

way

Mod

erni

zatio

n (5

309)

New

and

rep

lace

men

t bus

es, r

elat

ed e

quip

men

t, a

nd fa

cilit

ies.

M

oder

niza

tion

of e

xist

ing

rail

syst

ems,

new

and

re

plac

emen

t bus

es a

nd fa

cilit

ies,

new

fixe

d gu

idew

ay s

yste

ms

w

ww

.fta.

dot.

gov/

fund

ing/

gran

ts/g

rant

s_fin

anci

ng_3

557.

htm

l w

ww

.fta.

dot.

gov/

fund

ing/

gran

ts/g

rant

s_fin

anci

ng_3

558.

htm

l

Dis

cret

ion

fund

s m

ust b

e sp

ent i

n th

ree

fisca

l yea

rs.

Mat

ch: 8

0 %

Fed

eral

, 20

% lo

cal

allo

catio

n m

ust b

e sp

ent

in th

ree

year

s E

lm S

tree

t -A

dmin

- $22

5,00

0

Rein

vest

men

t- $

225,

000/

year

Dep

artm

ent o

f Com

mun

ity

and

Econ

omic

Dev

elop

men

t (D

CED

)

Gro

win

g G

reen

er II

Ca

pita

l im

prov

emen

t cos

ts a

nd th

ose

cost

s di

rect

ly r

elat

ed to

suc

h ph

ysic

al b

uild

ing

impr

ovem

ents

suc

h as

the

acqu

isiti

on a

nd p

re-d

evel

opm

ent c

osts

A

nnua

l fun

ding

ran

ge b

etw

een

$250

,000

to $

500,

000

Com

mun

ity A

ctio

n Te

am P

re-d

evel

opm

ent

Gra

nt to

Loa

n Pr

ogra

m

Earl

y st

age

capi

tal,

to fa

cilit

ate

sket

ch p

lann

ing,

cos

t est

imat

ing,

mar

ket e

valu

atio

n, m

inim

al s

ite c

ontr

ol a

ctiv

ities

an

d ge

nera

l dev

elop

men

t coo

rdin

atio

n.

$75,

000

per

proj

ect;

onl

ine

appl

icat

ion

proc

ess

/ ac

cept

ed

thro

ugho

ut th

e fis

cal y

ear

Com

mun

ity R

evita

lizat

ion

Prog

ram

(CRP

) Pr

ovid

es g

rant

fund

s to

sup

port

loca

l ini

tiativ

es th

at p

rom

ote

com

mun

ity s

tabi

lity

and

qual

ity o

f life

. Fu

ndin

g va

ries

– e

lect

roni

c si

ngle

app

licat

ion

for a

ssis

tanc

e w

ww

.new

PA.c

om; M

arch

21,

2011

sub

mis

sion

dea

dlin

e Co

mm

unity

& M

unic

ipal

Fac

ilitie

s A

ssis

tanc

e Pr

ogra

m

Impr

ove

the

stab

ility

of t

he c

omm

unity

; pro

mot

e ec

onom

ic a

nd/o

r co

mm

unity

dev

elop

men

t, im

prov

e ex

istin

g an

d/or

dev

elop

new

civ

ic, c

ultu

ral,

recr

eatio

nal,

indu

stri

al, a

nd o

ther

faci

litie

s or

act

iviti

es.

Fund

ing

vari

es –

ele

ctro

nic

sing

le a

pplic

atio

n fo

r ass

ista

nce

ww

w.n

ewPA

.com

; Mar

ch 2

1,20

11 s

ubm

issi

on d

eadl

ine

Elm

Str

eet P

rogr

am

Revi

taliz

atio

n of

resi

dent

ial a

nd m

ixed

use

nei

ghbo

rhoo

ds; a

dmin

istr

atio

n ca

ts to

sup

port

an

Elm

Str

eet P

rogr

am.

Fund

ing

– U

p to

$25

0,00

0. O

nlin

e ap

plic

atio

n pr

oces

s or

pr

inte

d co

py.

App

licat

ions

may

be

subm

itted

at a

ny ti

me.

Mai

n St

reet

Pro

gram

Ph

ysic

al im

prov

emen

ts s

uppo

rted

by

dow

ntow

n pl

an fo

r Dow

ntow

n Re

inve

stm

ent C

ompo

nent

, acq

uisi

tion

cost

s an

d ph

ysic

al b

uild

ing

impr

ovem

ents

for a

ncho

r bui

ldin

g co

mpo

nent

s.

Fund

ing

for

$115

,000

ove

r a 5

yea

r pe

riod

. D

ownt

own

rein

vest

men

t and

anc

hor

build

ing

com

pone

nts:

up

to

$250

,000

or

not t

o ex

ceed

30%

of p

roje

ct c

osts

.

Bike

s Be

long

Coa

litio

n

Bike

s Be

long

Pro

gram

El

igib

le to

age

ncie

s co

mm

itted

to p

uttin

g m

ore

peop

le o

n bi

cycl

es m

ore

ofte

n. In

clud

es b

ike

path

pav

ing,

bui

ldin

g ra

il-tr

ails

, mou

ntai

n bi

ke tr

ails

, bik

e pa

rks,

and

larg

e-sc

ale

bicy

cle

advo

cacy

initi

ativ

es.

http

://w

ww

.bik

esbe

long

.org

/nod

e/40

3 fu

ndin

g ro

unds

in 2

010:

App

licat

ions

due

May

28,

Aug

27

and

Nov

26,

201

0 up

to $

10,0

00

REI/

Bicy

cle

Frie

ndly

Com

mun

ities

Gra

nts

Cons

truc

tion

and

prom

otio

n pr

ojec

ts b

icyc

le fa

cilit

ies,

mar

ketin

g, e

duca

tion

and

awar

enes

s pr

ogra

mm

ing.

Su

ppor

ts b

icyc

le fr

iend

ly c

omm

uniti

es th

at a

re d

emon

stra

ting

succ

ess,

em

ploy

ing

crea

tive

stra

tegi

es, a

nd

show

ing

mar

ked

adva

ncem

ents

in b

ecom

ing

mor

e bi

cycl

e fr

iend

ly.

http

://w

ww

.bik

esbe

long

.org

/nod

e/22

1103

A

nnua

l Gra

nts

rang

e be

twee

n $5

,000

to $

15,0

00

Stre

etsc

ape

Enha

ncem

ents

Age

ncy

Gra

nt/F

undi

ng R

esou

rce

Des

crip

tion

/Elig

ibili

ty

Win

dow

of O

ppor

tuni

ty

Econ

omic

Dev

elop

men

t A

dmin

istr

atio

n (E

DA

)

Plan

ning

Pro

gram

Pu

blic

Wor

ks a

nd E

cono

mic

Dev

elop

men

t Fa

cilit

ies

Prog

ram

Co

mm

unity

Infr

astr

uctu

re A

RRA

Gra

nt

Plan

ning

initi

ativ

es d

esig

ned

to c

reat

e an

d re

tain

hig

her-

skill

, hig

her-

wag

e jo

bs, i

n ec

onom

ical

ly d

istr

esse

d re

gion

s. A

ssis

t loc

al a

nd re

gion

al o

rgan

izat

ions

with

thei

r sh

ort a

nd lo

ng te

rm p

lann

ing

effo

rts.

w

ww

.eda

.gov

/PD

F/FY

09-E

DA

P-FF

O-F

INA

L.pd

f Co

nstr

uctio

n or

reha

bilit

atio

n of

ess

entia

l pub

lic in

fras

truc

ture

and

faci

litie

s

ww

w.a

rc.g

ov/i

ndex

.do?

node

Id=3

320

$246

,000

,000

app

ropr

iate

d A

pplic

atio

n de

adlin

e - J

une

30,

2011

U.S

. Dep

artm

ent o

f Hou

sing

an

d U

rban

Dev

elop

men

t (H

UD

)

Com

mun

ity D

evel

opm

ent B

lock

Gra

nt (C

DBG

) –

ARR

A g

rant

fund

s H

ousi

ng a

nd in

fras

truc

ture

impr

ovem

ents

. Leb

anon

Cou

nty

adm

inis

ters

the

CDBG

pro

gram

ann

ually

. w

ww

.arc

.gov

/ind

ex.d

o?no

deId

=332

0 $1

3.61

bill

ion

in A

RRA

fund

ing.

PEN

ND

OT

Urb

an T

rans

it O

pera

ting

Ass

ista

nce

Prog

ram

Fu

nd p

rovi

ded

to c

over

cos

ts in

curr

ed in

the

daily

ope

ratio

n of

loca

l pub

lic tr

ansp

orta

tion.

Th

e an

nual

am

ount

of f

undi

ng is

det

erm

ined

by

legi

slat

ive

form

ula.

Urb

an C

apita

l Ass

ista

nce

Prog

ram

Pr

ovid

e gr

ants

to lo

cal o

pera

tors

of p

ublic

tran

spor

tatio

n sy

stem

. Lo

cal m

atch

ing

fund

s ar

e re

quir

ed.

Hom

etow

n St

reet

s; S

afe

Rout

es to

Sch

ool

Impr

ove

the

qual

ity o

f life

in o

ur c

omm

uniti

es.

Stre

etsc

ape

impr

ovem

ents

for

dow

ntow

ns a

nd c

omm

erci

al

cent

ers;

and

saf

e w

alki

ng a

nd b

ikin

g pa

ssag

es to

our

sch

ools

. w

ww

.dot

.sta

te.p

a.us

/Pen

ndot

/Bur

eaus

/CPD

M/P

rod/

Safe

rout

e.ns

f/gu

idan

ce?O

penP

age

ww

w.s

mar

t-tr

ansp

orta

tion.

com

Mat

chin

g fu

nds

– ut

ilize

s fe

dera

l fun

d; m

atch

is 2

0% o

f the

to

tal p

roje

ct c

osts

.

Penn

sylv

ania

Com

mun

ity T

rans

port

atio

n In

itiat

ive

(PCT

I) (S

mar

t Tra

nspo

rtat

ion)

Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Impr

ovem

ent P

rogr

am (T

IP) s

uppo

rts

pote

ntia

l pro

ject

s th

at e

xhib

it Sm

art T

rans

port

atio

n pr

inci

ples

.

$60

mill

ion

dolla

rs o

f fed

eral

and

sta

te tr

ansp

orta

tion

fund

s w

ill b

e m

ade

avai

labl

e. P

roje

cts

may

rec

eive

up

to $

5 m

illio

n do

llars

(no

mor

e th

an $

300,

00 d

olla

rs fo

r pla

nnin

g ac

tiviti

es) f

or p

roje

cts.

App

lican

ts m

ust r

eque

st fu

nds

thro

ugh

Penn

DO

T’s

Cent

er fo

r Pro

gram

Dev

elop

men

t and

M

anag

emen

t.

Dep

artm

ent o

f Com

mun

ity

and

Econ

omic

Dev

elop

men

t (D

CED

)

Gro

win

g G

reen

er II

Ca

pita

l im

prov

emen

t cos

ts a

nd th

ose

cost

s di

rect

ly r

elat

ed to

suc

h ph

ysic

al b

uild

ing

impr

ovem

ents

suc

h as

the

acqu

isiti

on a

nd p

re-d

evel

opm

ent c

osts

A

nnua

l fun

ding

ran

ge b

etw

een

$250

,000

to $

500,

000

Com

mun

ity A

ctio

n Te

am P

re-d

evel

opm

ent

Gra

nt to

Loa

n Pr

ogra

m

Earl

y st

age

capi

tal,

to fa

cilit

ate

sket

ch p

lann

ing,

cos

t est

imat

ing,

mar

ket e

valu

atio

n, m

inim

al s

ite c

ontr

ol a

ctiv

ities

an

d ge

nera

l dev

elop

men

t coo

rdin

atio

n.

$75,

000

per

proj

ect;

onl

ine

appl

icat

ion

proc

ess

/ ac

cept

ed

thro

ugho

ut th

e fis

cal y

ear

Mai

n St

reet

Pro

gram

Ph

ysic

al im

prov

emen

ts s

uppo

rted

by

dow

ntow

n pl

an fo

r Dow

ntow

n Re

inve

stm

ent C

ompo

nent

, acq

uisi

tion

cost

s an

d ph

ysic

al b

uild

ing

impr

ovem

ents

for a

ncho

r bui

ldin

g co

mpo

nent

s.

Fund

ing

for

$115

,000

ove

r a 5

yea

r pe

riod

. D

ownt

own

rein

vest

men

t and

anc

hor

build

ing

com

pone

nts:

up

to

$250

,000

or

not t

o ex

ceed

30%

of p

roje

ct c

osts

.

Dra

inag

e Im

prov

emen

ts

PA In

fras

truc

ture

Inve

stm

ent

Aut

hori

ty (P

ENN

VES

T)

Dri

nkin

g W

ater

, Was

tew

ater

and

Sto

rm w

ater

Lo

ans

and

Non

-Poi

nt S

ourc

e Fi

nanc

ing

A

mer

ica

Reco

very

& R

einv

estm

ent A

ct 2

009

(ARR

A) G

reen

Res

erve

Gra

nts

Gro

win

g G

reen

er G

rant

s

Prog

ram

pro

vide

s to

pro

ject

s th

roug

hout

PA

for

the

cons

truc

tion

and

mai

nten

ance

of w

aste

wat

er tr

eatm

ent

faci

litie

s, s

torm

wat

er m

anag

emen

t pro

ject

s, n

on-p

oint

sou

rce

pollu

tion

cont

rols

, and

wat

ersh

ed a

nd e

stua

ry

man

agem

ent.

w

ww

.por

tal.s

tate

.pa.

us/p

orta

l/se

rver

.pt/

com

mun

ity/a

vaila

ble_

fund

ing

The

PEN

NVE

ST B

oard

mee

ts th

ree

times

per

yea

r-M

arch

, Ju

ly a

nd N

ovem

ber.

App

licat

ions

are

due

9 w

eeks

prio

r to

Bo

ard

mee

tings

.

Com

mon

wea

lth

Fina

ncin

g A

utho

rity

(CFA

) in

conj

unct

ion

wit

h PA

DEP

&

DCE

D

H2O

PA

Gra

nts

Wat

er, w

aste

wat

er, s

torm

wat

er, f

lood

pro

tect

ion

and

dam

saf

ety

proj

ects

. ht

tp:/

/ww

w.n

ewpa

.com

/fin

d-an

d-ap

ply-

for-

fund

ing/

com

mon

wea

lth-f

inan

cing

-aut

hori

ty/i

ndex

.asp

x - $

489,

324,

680

was

aw

arde

d in

July

of 2

009.

- N

ew ro

und

set f

or A

ugus

t 201

0.

Econ

omic

Dev

elop

men

t A

dmin

istr

atio

n (E

DA

)

Publ

ic W

orks

and

Eco

nom

ic D

evel

opm

ent

Faci

litie

s Pr

ogra

m C

omm

unity

Infr

astr

uctu

re

ARR

A G

rant

Pl

anni

ng P

rogr

am

Plan

ning

initi

ativ

es d

esig

ned

to c

reat

e an

d re

tain

hig

her-

skill

, hig

her-

wag

e jo

bs, i

n ec

onom

ical

ly d

istr

esse

d re

gion

s. A

ssis

t loc

al a

nd re

gion

al o

rgan

izat

ions

with

thei

r sh

ort a

nd lo

ng te

rm p

lann

ing

effo

rts.

w

ww

.eda

.gov

/PD

F/FY

09-E

DA

P-FF

O-F

INA

L.pd

f Co

nstr

uctio

n or

reha

bilit

atio

n of

ess

entia

l pub

lic in

fras

truc

ture

and

faci

litie

s

ww

w.a

rc.g

ov/i

ndex

.do?

node

Id=3

320

$246

,000

,000

app

ropr

iate

d A

pplic

atio

n de

adlin

e - J

une

30,

2011

U.S

. Dep

artm

ent o

f Hou

sing

an

d U

rban

Dev

elop

men

t (H

UD

)

Com

mun

ity D

evel

opm

ent B

lock

Gra

nt (C

DBG

) –

ARR

A g

rant

fund

s H

ousi

ng a

nd r

evita

lizat

ion

proj

ects

. w

ww

.arc

.gov

/ind

ex.d

o?no

deId

=332

0 $1

3.61

bill

ion

in A

RRA

fund

ing.

Envi

ronm

enta

l Pro

tect

ion

Age

ncy

(EPA

)

Clea

n W

ater

Sta

te R

evol

ving

Fun

d an

d D

rink

ing

Wat

er S

tate

Rev

olvi

ng F

und

- Gre

en

Proj

ect R

eser

ve G

rant

Proj

ects

that

pro

tect

and

pro

mot

e “g

reen

”; jo

b cr

eatio

n; a

nd h

ealth

ier e

nviro

nmen

t, w

ater

qua

lity

and

was

tew

ater

infr

astr

uctu

re, g

reen

infr

astr

uctu

re, w

ater

and

ene

rgy

effic

ienc

y, a

nd e

nvir

onm

enta

lly in

nova

tive

proj

ects

. Pr

omot

e an

d en

cour

age

envi

ronm

enta

l res

pons

ibili

ties

in o

ur c

omm

uniti

es th

at a

re c

reat

ive

and

inno

vativ

e w

ith g

reen

sol

utio

ns fo

r w

ater

qua

lity

man

agem

ent.

Pro

gram

pro

vide

s a

reso

urce

for

fund

ing

vario

us

publ

ic d

rink

ing

wat

er s

yste

ms

for e

xpen

ditu

res

for p

roje

cts

whi

ch w

ill fa

cilit

ate

com

plia

nce

with

nat

iona

l and

st

ate

drin

king

wat

er r

egul

atio

ns o

r oth

erw

ise

adva

nce

the

heal

th p

rote

ctio

n ob

ject

ives

of t

he S

tate

Dri

nkin

g W

ater

Act

. w

ww

.epa

.gov

/rec

over

y/ba

sic.

htm

l

$40

mill

ion

for

stat

e A

RRA

fund

ing

U.S

. Dep

artm

ent o

f A

gric

ultu

re (U

SDA

)

Com

mun

ity F

acili

ties

Loan

s an

d G

rant

s In

fras

truc

ture

and

Rur

al D

evel

opm

ent

Esse

ntia

l com

mun

ity fa

cilit

ies

to c

onst

ruct

, enl

arge

, or i

mpr

ove

com

mun

ity fa

cilit

ies

for

heal

th c

are,

pub

lic s

afet

y,

and

com

mun

ity a

nd p

ublic

ser

vice

s.

ww

w.r

urde

v.us

da.g

ov/r

hs/c

f/br

ief_

cp_g

rant

.htm

Ass

ista

nce

may

be

avai

labl

e fo

r up

to 7

5% o

f the

pro

ject

co

st.

Fund

ing

limita

tions

are

bas

ed o

n po

pula

tion,

inco

me,

ec

onom

ic fe

asib

ility

, and

ava

ilabi

lity

of fu

nds.

Rura

l Com

mun

ity D

evel

opm

ent I

nitia

tive

Gra

nts

To d

evel

op th

e ca

paci

ty a

nd a

bilit

y of

pri

vate

, non

-pro

fit c

omm

unity

bas

ed h

ousi

ng a

nd c

omm

unity

dev

elop

men

t or

gani

zatio

ns, a

nd h

ow in

com

e ru

ral c

omm

uniti

es to

impr

ove

hous

ing,

com

mun

ity fa

cilit

ies,

com

mun

ity a

nd

econ

omic

dev

elop

men

t pro

ject

s in

rur

al a

reas

.

The

$6,2

86,5

00 in

RCD

I gra

nt fu

nds

are

avai

labl

e to

in

term

edia

ries

and

hav

e a

dolla

r fo

r do

llar m

atch

ing

fund

re

quir

emen

t, in

tend

ed to

dou

ble

the

impa

ct o

f the

gra

nts.

Q

ualif

ied

orga

niza

tions

can

be

publ

ic o

r pri

vate

(inc

ludi

ng

trib

al o

rgan

izat

ions

) tha

t hav

e be

en le

gally

org

aniz

ed fo

r at

le

ast t

hree

yea

rs a

nd h

ave

expe

rien

ce w

orki

ng w

ith e

ligib

le

reci

pien

ts. R

ecip

ient

s of

ass

ista

nce

from

the

inte

rmed

iary

ca

n be

non

-pro

fit o

rgan

izat

ions

, low

-inco

me

com

mun

ities

, or

fede

rally

reco

gniz

ed tr

ibes

.

Dow

ntow

n Re

vita

lizat

ion

Age

ncy

Gra

nt/F

undi

ng R

esou

rce

Des

crip

tion

/Elig

ibili

ty

Win

dow

of O

ppor

tuni

ty

US

Dep

artm

ent o

f A

gric

ultu

re (U

SDA

)

Com

mun

ity F

acili

ties

Loan

s an

d G

rant

s In

fras

truc

ture

and

Rur

al D

evel

opm

ent

Impr

ove

esse

ntia

l com

mun

ity fa

cilit

ies

in c

omm

uniti

es. w

ww

.rur

dev.

usda

.gov

/rhs

/cf/

brie

f_cp

_gra

nt.h

tm

The

amou

nt o

f gra

nt a

ssis

tanc

e fo

r a

proj

ect c

osts

dep

ends

up

on th

e m

edia

n ho

useh

old

inco

me

and

the

popu

latio

n in

th

e co

mm

unity

whe

re th

e pr

ojec

t is

loca

ted

and

the

avai

labi

lity

of g

rant

fund

s.

Rura

l Com

mun

ity D

evel

opm

ent I

nitia

tive

Gra

nts

To d

evel

op th

e ca

paci

ty a

nd a

bilit

y of

pri

vate

, non

-pro

fit c

omm

unity

bas

ed h

ousi

ng a

nd c

omm

unity

dev

elop

men

t or

gani

zatio

ns, a

nd h

ow in

com

e ru

ral c

omm

uniti

es to

impr

ove

hous

ing,

com

mun

ity fa

cilit

ies,

com

mun

ity a

nd

econ

omic

dev

elop

men

t pro

ject

s in

rur

al a

reas

.

The

$6,2

86,5

00 in

RCD

I gra

nt fu

nds

are

avai

labl

e to

in

term

edia

ries

and

hav

e a

dolla

r fo

r do

llar m

atch

ing

fund

re

quir

emen

t, in

tend

ed to

dou

ble

the

impa

ct o

f the

gra

nts.

Q

ualif

ied

orga

niza

tions

can

be

publ

ic o

r pri

vate

(inc

ludi

ng

trib

al o

rgan

izat

ions

) tha

t hav

e be

en le

gally

org

aniz

ed fo

r at

le

ast t

hree

yea

rs a

nd h

ave

expe

rien

ce w

orki

ng w

ith e

ligib

le

reci

pien

ts. R

ecip

ient

s of

ass

ista

nce

from

the

inte

rmed

iary

ca

n be

non

-pro

fit o

rgan

izat

ions

, low

-inco

me

com

mun

ities

, or

fede

rally

reco

gniz

ed tr

ibes

.

Econ

omic

Dev

elop

men

t A

dmin

istr

atio

n (E

DA

) Pl

anni

ng P

rogr

am

Plan

ning

initi

ativ

es d

esig

ned

to c

reat

e an

d re

tain

hig

her-

skill

, hig

her-

wag

e jo

bs, i

n ec

onom

ical

ly d

istr

esse

d re

gion

s. A

ssis

t loc

al a

nd re

gion

al o

rgan

izat

ions

with

thei

r sh

ort a

nd lo

ng te

rm p

lann

ing

effo

rts.

w

ww

.eda

.gov

/PD

F/FY

09-E

DA

P-FF

O-F

INA

L.pd

f

Pote

ntia

l ap

plic

ants

are

res

pons

ible

for

dem

onst

ratin

g to

ED

A,

by

prov

idin

g st

atis

tics

and

othe

r in

form

atio

n,

as

appr

opri

ate,

the

nat

ure

and

leve

l of e

cono

mic

dis

tres

s in

the

re

gion

. G

rant

may

not

exc

eed

50%

of

the

tota

l co

st o

f th

e pr

ojec

t. P

roje

cts

may

rec

eive

an

addi

tiona

l am

ount

tha

t sh

all

not

exce

ed 3

0%, b

ased

on

the

rela

tive

need

s of

the

reg

ion

in

whi

ch th

e pr

ojec

t will

be

loca

ted,

as

dete

rmin

ed b

y ED

A.

U.S

. Dep

artm

ent o

f Hou

sing

an

d U

rban

Dev

elop

men

t (H

UD

)

Com

mun

ity D

evel

opm

ent B

lock

Gra

nt (C

DBG

) –

ARR

A g

rant

fund

s

com

mun

ity d

evel

opm

ent a

ctiv

ities

: Acq

uisi

tion,

dem

oliti

on, r

ehab

ilita

tion,

str

eets

, wat

er a

nd s

ewer

faci

litie

s,

neig

hbor

hood

cen

ters

, rec

reat

ion

faci

litie

s, a

nd o

ther

pub

lic w

orks

; eco

nom

ic d

evel

opm

ent a

ctiv

ities

w

ww

.arc

.gov

/ind

ex.d

o?no

deId

=332

0 A

nnua

l gra

nt c

ycle

Dep

artm

ent o

f Com

mun

ity

and

Econ

omic

Dev

elop

men

t (D

CED

)

Gro

win

g G

reen

er II

Ca

pita

l im

prov

emen

t cos

ts a

nd th

ose

cost

s di

rect

ly r

elat

ed to

suc

h ph

ysic

al b

uild

ing

impr

ovem

ents

suc

h as

the

acqu

isiti

on a

nd p

re-d

evel

opm

ent c

osts

A

nnua

l fun

ding

ran

ge b

etw

een

$250

,000

to $

500,

000

Mai

n St

reet

Pro

gram

Ph

ysic

al im

prov

emen

ts s

uppo

rted

by

dow

ntow

n pl

an fo

r Dow

ntow

n Re

inve

stm

ent C

ompo

nent

, acq

uisi

tion

cost

s an

d ph

ysic

al b

uild

ing

impr

ovem

ents

for a

ncho

r bui

ldin

g co

mpo

nent

s.

Fund

ing

for

$115

,000

ove

r a 5

yea

r pe

riod

. D

ownt

own

rein

vest

men

t and

anc

hor

build

ing

com

pone

nts:

up

to

$250

,000

or

not t

o ex

ceed

30%

of p

roje

ct c

osts

.

Com

mun

ity R

evita

lizat

ion

Prog

ram

(CRP

) Pr

ovid

es g

rant

fund

s to

sup

port

loca

l ini

tiativ

es th

at p

rom

ote

com

mun

ity s

tabi

lity

and

qual

ity o

f life

. Fu

ndin

g va

ries

– e

lect

roni

c si

ngle

app

licat

ion

for a

ssis

tanc

e w

ww

.new

PA.c

om; M

arch

21,

2011

sub

mis

sion

dea

dlin

e H

ousi

ng &

Red

evel

opm

ent A

ssis

tanc

e Co

mm

unity

Ser

vice

s Bl

ock

Gra

nt

Urb

an D

evel

opm

ent P

rogr

am

Regi

onal

Eco

nom

ic D

evel

opm

ent D

istr

ict

Initi

ativ

e Pr

ogra

m (R

EDD

I)

Com

mun

ity d

evel

opm

ent,

rede

velo

pmen

t and

rev

italiz

atio

n pr

ojec

ts. w

ww

.new

pa.c

om

Fund

ing

leve

ls v

ary

ever

y ye

ar. G

rant

aw

ards

are

mad

e in

th

ree

fund

ing

roun

ds d

urin

g th

e fis

cal y

ear.

DCE

D w

ill g

rant

ap

prox

imat

ely

1/3

of th

e pr

ogra

m a

ppro

pria

tion

in e

ach

roun

d. (A

pplic

atio

ns d

ue: M

arch

, Sep

tem

ber

and

Dec

embe

r).

Gat

eway

Age

ncy

Gra

nt/F

undi

ng R

esou

rce

Des

crip

tion

/Elig

ibili

ty

Win

dow

of O

ppor

tuni

ty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Com

mun

ity

and

Econ

omic

Dev

elop

men

t (D

CED

)

Gro

win

g G

reen

er II

Ca

pita

l im

prov

emen

t cos

ts a

nd th

ose

cost

s di

rect

ly r

elat

ed to

suc

h ph

ysic

al b

uild

ing

impr

ovem

ents

suc

h as

the

acqu

isiti

on a

nd p

re-d

evel

opm

ent c

osts

A

nnua

l fun

ding

ran

ge b

etw

een

$250

,000

to $

500,

000

Urb

an D

evel

opm

ent P

rogr

am

Regi

onal

Eco

nom

ic D

evel

opm

ent D

istr

ict

Initi

ativ

e Pr

ogra

m (R

EDD

I) Co

mm

unity

dev

elop

men

t, re

deve

lopm

ent a

nd r

evita

lizat

ion

proj

ects

. ww

w.n

ewpa

.com

Fund

ing

leve

ls v

ary

ever

y ye

ar. G

rant

aw

ards

are

mad

e in

th

ree

fund

ing

roun

ds d

urin

g th

e fis

cal y

ear.

DCE

D w

ill g

rant

ap

prox

imat

ely

1/3

of th

e pr

ogra

m a

ppro

pria

tion

in e

ach

roun

d. (A

pplic

atio

ns d

ue: M

arch

, Sep

tem

ber

and

Dec

embe

r).

Com

mun

ity R

evita

lizat

ion

Prog

ram

(CRP

) Pr

ovid

es g

rant

fund

s to

sup

port

loca

l ini

tiativ

es th

at p

rom

ote

com

mun

ity s

tabi

lity

and

qual

ity o

f life

. Fu

ndin

g va

ries

– e

lect

roni

c si

ngle

app

licat

ion

for

assi

stan

ce

ww

w.n

ewPA

.com

; Mar

ch 2

1,20

11 s

ubm

issi

on d

eadl

ine

Mai

n St

reet

Pro

gram

Ph

ysic

al im

prov

emen

ts s

uppo

rted

by

dow

ntow

n pl

an fo

r Dow

ntow

n Re

inve

stm

ent C

ompo

nent

, acq

uisi

tion

cost

s an

d ph

ysic

al b

uild

ing

impr

ovem

ents

for a

ncho

r bui

ldin

g co

mpo

nent

s.

Fund

ing

for

$115

,000

ove

r a

5 ye

ar p

erio

d.

Dow

ntow

n re

inve

stm

ent

and

anch

or

build

ing

com

pone

nts:

up

to

$2

50,0

00 o

r no

t to

exce

ed 3

0% o

f pro

ject

cos

ts.

Dow

ntow

n Im

prov

emen

t D

istr

ict (

DID

) D

ownt

own

prop

erty

ow

ners

A

DID

pro

gram

is a

spe

cial

tax

asse

ssm

ent d

istr

ict c

reat

ed b

y a

mun

icip

ality

for

a sp

ecifi

c fu

nctio

n or

pur

pose

. A

D

istr

ict A

utho

rity

can

oper

ate

and

man

age

stre

etsc

ape

enha

ncem

ent p

roje

cts,

saf

ety

and

clea

ning

pro

ject

s, a

nd

othe

r do

wnt

own

impr

ovem

ent i

nitia

tives

.

Tax

asse

ssm

ent

leve

ls d

iffer

dep

endi

ng o

n th

e si

ze o

f th

e di

stri

ct a

nd le

vel o

f ass

essm

ent.

Park

ing

Lot D

evel

opm

ent P

roje

ct*

Age

ncy

Gra

nt/F

undi

ng R

esou

rce

Des

crip

tion

/Elig

ibili

ty

Win

dow

of O

ppor

tuni

ty

U.S

. Dep

artm

ent o

f A

gric

ultu

re (U

SDA

)

Com

mun

ity F

acili

ties

Loan

s an

d G

rant

s In

fras

truc

ture

and

Rur

al D

evel

opm

ent

Esse

ntia

l com

mun

ity fa

cilit

ies

to c

onst

ruct

, enl

arge

, or i

mpr

ove

com

mun

ity fa

cilit

ies

for

heal

th c

are,

pub

lic

safe

ty, a

nd c

omm

unity

and

pub

lic s

ervi

ces

ww

w.r

urde

v.us

da.g

ov/r

hs/c

f/br

ief_

cp_g

rant

.htm

Ass

ista

nce

may

be

avai

labl

e fo

r up

to 7

5% o

f the

pro

ject

co

st.

Fund

ing

limita

tions

are

bas

ed o

n po

pula

tion,

inco

me,

ec

onom

ic fe

asib

ility

, and

ava

ilabi

lity

of fu

nds.

Rura

l Com

mun

ity D

evel

opm

ent I

nitia

tive

Gra

nts

To d

evel

op th

e ca

paci

ty a

nd a

bilit

y of

pri

vate

, non

-pro

fit c

omm

unity

bas

ed h

ousi

ng a

nd c

omm

unity

dev

elop

men

t or

gani

zatio

ns, a

nd h

ow in

com

e ru

ral c

omm

uniti

es to

impr

ove

hous

ing,

com

mun

ity fa

cilit

ies,

com

mun

ity a

nd

econ

omic

dev

elop

men

t pro

ject

s in

rur

al a

reas

.

The

$6,2

86,5

00 in

RCD

I gra

nt fu

nds

are

avai

labl

e to

in

term

edia

ries

and

hav

e a

dolla

r fo

r do

llar m

atch

ing

fund

re

quir

emen

t, in

tend

ed to

dou

ble

the

impa

ct o

f the

gra

nts.

Q

ualif

ied

orga

niza

tions

can

be

publ

ic o

r pri

vate

(inc

ludi

ng

trib

al o

rgan

izat

ions

) tha

t hav

e be

en le

gally

org

aniz

ed fo

r at

le

ast t

hree

yea

rs a

nd h

ave

expe

rien

ce w

orki

ng w

ith e

ligib

le

reci

pien

ts. R

ecip

ient

s of

ass

ista

nce

from

the

inte

rmed

iary

ca

n be

non

-pro

fit o

rgan

izat

ions

, low

-inco

me

com

mun

ities

, or

fede

rally

reco

gniz

ed tr

ibes

.

Econ

omic

Dev

elop

men

t A

dmin

istr

atio

n (E

DA

)

Plan

ning

Pro

gram

Pu

blic

Wor

ks a

nd E

cono

mic

Dev

elop

men

t Fa

cilit

ies

Prog

ram

Co

mm

unity

Infr

astr

uctu

re A

RRA

Gra

nt

Plan

ning

initi

ativ

es d

esig

ned

to c

reat

e an

d re

tain

hig

her-

skill

, hig

her-

wag

e jo

bs, i

n ec

onom

ical

ly d

istr

esse

d re

gion

s. A

ssis

t loc

al a

nd re

gion

al o

rgan

izat

ions

with

thei

r sh

ort a

nd lo

ng te

rm p

lann

ing

effo

rts.

w

ww

.eda

.gov

/PD

F/FY

09-E

DA

P-FF

O-F

INA

L.pd

f Co

nstr

uctio

n or

reha

bilit

atio

n of

ess

entia

l pub

lic in

fras

truc

ture

and

faci

litie

s

ww

w.a

rc.g

ov/i

ndex

.do?

node

Id=3

320

$246

,000

,000

app

ropr

iate

d A

pplic

atio

n de

adlin

e - J

une

30,

2011

FHW

A

Capi

tal I

nves

tmen

ts in

Sur

face

Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Infr

astr

uctu

re (A

RRA

) (T

IGER

gra

nts)

Fe

dera

l Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Fund

ing

Repl

enis

hed

the

Hig

hway

Tru

st F

und

Tran

spor

tatio

n pr

ojec

ts to

be

prov

ided

to a

Sta

te, l

ocal

gov

ernm

ent,

tran

sit a

genc

y or

col

labo

ratio

n am

ong

such

en

titie

s w

ith lo

ng-t

erm

out

com

es o

r job

cre

atio

n, in

nova

tion

and

stem

par

tner

ship

s. S

afe

Rout

es to

Sch

ools

; Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Enha

ncem

ents

; Rec

reat

iona

l Tra

ils; S

ceni

c By

way

s; a

nd th

e U

.S. B

icyc

le R

oute

Sys

tem

w

ww

.fhw

a.do

t.go

v/ec

onom

icre

cove

ry/i

ndex

.htm

w

ww

.am

eric

antr

ails

.org

/rtp

/Obe

rsta

r-tr

ansp

orta

tion-

plan

-Jun

e-20

09.h

tml

$600

,000

,000

is a

vaila

ble

thro

ugh

Sept

embe

r 30,

201

2

Cong

estio

n M

anag

emen

t and

Air

Qua

lity

Impr

ovem

ent P

rogr

am (C

MA

Q)

Proj

ects

that

red

uce

crite

ria a

ir p

ollu

tant

s re

gula

ted

from

tran

spor

tatio

n-re

late

d so

urce

s ov

er a

per

iod

of fi

ve

year

s.

$8.6

bill

ion

dolla

rs in

fund

s to

Sta

te D

OTs

, MPO

s, a

nd tr

ansi

t ag

enci

es

PEN

ND

OT

Urb

an T

rans

it O

pera

ting

Ass

ista

nce

Prog

ram

Fu

nd p

rovi

ded

to c

over

cos

ts in

curr

ed in

the

daily

ope

ratio

n of

loca

l pub

lic tr

ansp

orta

tion.

Th

e an

nual

am

ount

of f

undi

ng is

det

erm

ined

by

legi

slat

ive

form

ula.

U

rban

Cap

ital A

ssis

tanc

e Pr

ogra

m

Prov

ide

gran

ts to

loca

l ope

rato

rs o

f pub

lic tr

ansp

orta

tion

syst

em.

Loca

l mat

chin

g fu

nds

are

requ

ired

.

Hom

etow

n St

reet

s; S

afe

Rout

es to

Sch

ool

Impr

ove

the

qual

ity o

f life

in o

ur c

omm

uniti

es.

Stre

etsc

ape

impr

ovem

ents

for

dow

ntow

ns a

nd c

omm

erci

al

cent

ers;

and

saf

e w

alki

ng a

nd b

ikin

g pa

ssag

es to

our

sch

ools

. w

ww

.dot

.sta

te.p

a.us

/Pen

ndot

/Bur

eaus

/CPD

M/P

rod/

Safe

rout

e.ns

f/gu

idan

ce?O

penP

age

ww

w.s

mar

t-tr

ansp

orta

tion.

com

Mat

chin

g fu

nds

– ut

ilize

s fe

dera

l fun

d; m

atch

is 2

0% o

f the

to

tal p

roje

ct c

osts

.

Penn

sylv

ania

Com

mun

ity T

rans

port

atio

n In

itiat

ive

(PCT

I) (S

mar

t Tra

nspo

rtat

ion)

Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Impr

ovem

ent P

rogr

am (T

IP) s

uppo

rts

pote

ntia

l pro

ject

s th

at e

xhib

it Sm

art T

rans

port

atio

n pr

inci

ples

.

$60

mill

ion

dolla

rs o

f fed

eral

and

sta

te tr

ansp

orta

tion

fund

s w

ill b

e m

ade

avai

labl

e. P

roje

cts

may

rec

eive

up

to $

5 m

illio

n do

llars

(no

mor

e th

an $

300,

00 d

olla

rs fo

r pla

nnin

g ac

tiviti

es) f

or p

roje

cts.

App

lican

ts m

ust r

eque

st fu

nds

thro

ugh

Penn

DO

T’s

Cent

er fo

r Pro

gram

Dev

elop

men

t and

M

anag

emen

t.

Fede

ral T

rans

it

Adm

inis

trat

ion

Bus

and

Bus

Faci

litie

s; R

ail a

nd F

ixed

Gui

dew

ay

Mod

erni

zatio

n (5

309)

New

and

rep

lace

men

t bus

es, r

elat

ed e

quip

men

t, a

nd fa

cilit

ies.

Mod

erni

zatio

n of

exi

stin

g ra

il sy

stem

s, n

ew a

nd re

plac

emen

t bus

es a

nd fa

cilit

ies,

new

fixe

d gu

idew

ay s

yste

ms

w

ww

.fta.

dot.

gov/

fund

ing/

gran

ts/g

rant

s_fin

anci

ng_3

557.

htm

l w

ww

.fta.

dot.

gov/

fund

ing/

gran

ts/g

rant

s_fin

anci

ng_3

558.

htm

l

Dis

cret

ion

fund

s m

ust b

e sp

ent i

n th

ree

fisca

l yea

rs.

Mat

ch:

80%

Fed

eral

, 20%

loca

l al

loca

tion

mus

t be

spen

t in

thre

e ye

ars

Elm

Str

eet -

Adm

in- $

225,

000

Re

inve

stm

ent-

$22

5,00

0/ye

ar

Dep

artm

ent o

f Com

mun

ity

and

Econ

omic

Dev

elop

men

t (D

CED

)

Com

mun

ity R

evita

lizat

ion

Prog

ram

(CRP

) Pr

ovid

es g

rant

fund

s to

sup

port

loca

l ini

tiativ

es th

at p

rom

ote

com

mun

ity s

tabi

lity

and

qual

ity o

f life

. Fu

ndin

g va

ries

– e

lect

roni

c si

ngle

app

licat

ion

for a

ssis

tanc

e w

ww

.new

PA.c

om; M

arch

21,

2011

sub

mis

sion

dea

dlin

e Co

mm

unity

& M

unic

ipal

Fac

ilitie

s A

ssis

tanc

e Pr

ogra

m

Impr

ove

the

stab

ility

of t

he c

omm

unity

; pro

mot

e ec

onom

ic a

nd/o

r co

mm

unity

dev

elop

men

t, im

prov

e ex

istin

g an

d/or

dev

elop

new

civ

ic, c

ultu

ral,

recr

eatio

nal,

indu

stri

al, a

nd o

ther

faci

litie

s or

act

iviti

es.

Fund

ing

vari

es –

ele

ctro

nic

sing

le a

pplic

atio

n fo

r ass

ista

nce

ww

w.n

ewPA

.com

; Mar

ch 2

1,20

11 s

ubm

issi

on d

eadl

ine

Elm

Str

eet P

rogr

am

Revi

taliz

atio

n of

resi

dent

ial a

nd m

ixed

use

nei

ghbo

rhoo

ds; a

dmin

istr

atio

n ca

ts to

sup

port

an

Elm

Str

eet P

rogr

am.

Fund

ing

– U

p to

$25

0,00

0. O

nlin

e ap

plic

atio

n pr

oces

s or

pr

inte

d co

py.

App

licat

ions

may

be

subm

itted

at a

ny ti

me.

Mai

n St

reet

Pro

gram

Ph

ysic

al im

prov

emen

ts s

uppo

rted

by

dow

ntow

n pl

an fo

r Dow

ntow

n Re

inve

stm

ent C

ompo

nent

, acq

uisi

tion

cost

s an

d ph

ysic

al b

uild

ing

impr

ovem

ents

for a

ncho

r bui

ldin

g co

mpo

nent

s.

Fund

ing

for

$115

,000

ove

r a 5

yea

r pe

riod

. D

ownt

own

rein

vest

men

t and

anc

hor

build

ing

com

pone

nts:

up

to

$250

,000

or

not t

o ex

ceed

30%

of p

roje

ct c

osts

.

Gro

win

g G

reen

er II

Ca

pita

l im

prov

emen

t cos

ts a

nd th

ose

cost

s di

rect

ly r

elat

ed to

suc

h ph

ysic

al b

uild

ing

impr

ovem

ents

suc

h as

the

acqu

isiti

on a

nd p

re-d

evel

opm

ent c

osts

A

nnua

l fun

ding

ran

ge b

etw

een

$250

,000

to $

500,

000

Com

mun

ity A

ctio

n Te

am P

re-d

evel

opm

ent

Gra

nt to

Loa

n Pr

ogra

m

Earl

y st

age

capi

tal,

to fa

cilit

ate

sket

ch p

lann

ing,

cos

t est

imat

ing,

mar

ket e

valu

atio

n, m

inim

al s

ite c

ontr

ol a

ctiv

ities

an

d ge

nera

l dev

elop

men

t coo

rdin

atio

n.

$75,

000

per

proj

ect;

onl

ine

appl

icat

ion

proc

ess

/ ac

cept

ed

thro

ugho

ut th

e fis

cal y

ear

* Fu

ndin

g m

ay b

e de

pend

ent u

pon

the

leve

l of e

cono

mic

dev

elop

men

t, in

crea

se in

jobs

, aff

iliat

ion

to tr

ansi

t fac

ilitie

s an

d op

erat

ions

, and

or p

rivat

e in

vest

men

t.

Appendix G

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor Study Final Report October 2010

Appendix G: GAP Analysis

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor Study Final Report October 2010

P a g e | i

Table of Contents Appendix G.1 GAP Analysis ........................................................................................................................... 1

Appendix G.1.1: Oil City Study Area / Gap Analysis Results ..................................................................... 1

Appendix G.1.2: Oil City (2 Mile Radius) / Gap Analysis Results ............................................................... 3

Appendix G.1.3: Oil City Surrounding Area (8 Mile Radius) / Gap Analysis Results ................................. 5

Appendix G.1.4: Oil City Study Area .......................................................................................................... 9

Appendix G.1.5: Oil City (2 Mile Radius) ................................................................................................. 11

Appendix G.1.6: Oil City Surrounding Area (8 Mile Radius) .................................................................... 13

Appendix G

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor Study Final Report October 2010

P a g e | 1

Appendix G.1 GAP Analysis For reference, opportunity gaps indicate the expenditure of local dollars outside of the community (goods and services not adequately provided for in the local community) and the surplus gaps of goods and services provided in the City or Surrounding Area that meet regional demand.

Appendix G.1.1: Oil City Study Area / Gap Analysis Results

The data indicates that the Oil City Study Area may be able to support a motor vehicle and parts dealer, gasoline station, a general merchandise store, or clothing and clothing accessory store. The data also indicates that the Oil City Study Area is meeting a regional demand for electronics and appliances, building materials and garden equipment, food and beverage products, health and personal care facilities and products, and food services and drinking places. Utilizing a gap analysis provides an initial indicator for retail and services opportunities for a selected region, therefore further market study and analysis is considered prudent.

Table G.1-1: Oil City Study Area Opportunity Gap & Opportunity Surplus Oil City Study Area Opportunity Gap & Opportunity Surplus

Opportunity Gaps: Opportunities for new or expanded stores. Local resident demand exceeds local store supply of goods or services for the following:

$463,797 for Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealers (automotive dealers) $64,519 for Furniture and Home Furnishings $696,896 for Gasoline Stations (stations with or without convenience stores) $209,647 for Clothing and Clothing Accessory products (clothing, shoe, jewelry, luggage, and leather

stores) $65,405 for Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book, Music products (sporting goods, books, periodical, and

musical instrument stores) $599,933 for General Merchandise Store products (department stores) $37,640 for Miscellaneous Store products (florists, office supplies, gifts, and used merchandise stores) $390,795 for Non-Store Retailers

Opportunity Surplus: Opportunities to meet regional demand. Local store supply of goods and services in this area exceeds local resident demand. This indicates that people from outside the area come here to purchase the following products.

$107,918 for Electronics and Appliances (appliance, electronic, computer and software, camera equipment stores)

$291,472 for Building Materials, Garden Equipment Store products $1,439,426 for Food and Beverage Store products (grocery, specialty foods, beer, wine, & liquor stores) $966,146 for Health and Personal Care Store products (health and personal care merchandise from

fixed point-of-sale locations – which may include Doctors, Physicians, Counselors, as staff) $112,602 for Food Service and Drinking Places (full service restaurants, limited service restaurants,

special food services, and drinking places)

Source: 2010 Claritas Inc., GAP Report

Appendix G

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor Study Final Report October 2010

P a g e | 2

Factors such as location as well as local and regional demand must be further analyzed through a feasibility study by the private sector to validate the potential for the following additional business establishments and number of employees. Current land use regulations with respect to retail favor small to medium sized retail operations.

Table G.1-2: Oil City Study Area Business Overview – Existing Conditions Oil City Study Area Business Overview

Total Total Business Description Establishments Employees Industries (All) 92 666 Industries (Private Sector) 73 431 Industries (Government and Non-Profit) 19 235 Retail (All Retail) 30 186 Building Materials and Garden Supply 1 6 General Merchandise Stores 1 6 Food Stores 6 33 Auto Dealers and Gas Stations 2 3 Apparel and Accessory Stores 0 0 Home Furniture, Furnishings and Equipment 3 15 Eating and Drinking Places 10 61 Miscellaneous Retail Stores 7 62 Service (All) 34 268 Hotel and Other Lodging 0 0 Personal Services 4 9 Business Services 2 3 Motion Picture and Amusement 1 6 Health Services 10 57 Legal Services 1 2 Educational Services 1 11 Social Services 5 150 Misc, Membership Orgs and Non-classified 10 30

Source: 2010 Claritas Inc.

Appendix G

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor Study Final Report October 2010

P a g e | 3

Appendix G.1.2: Oil City (2 Mile Radius) / Gap Analysis Results

The data indicates that the two mile radius within Oil City may be able to support in addition to the current businesses, motor vehicle and parts dealer, furniture and home furnishing store, electronics and appliance store, food and beverage store, health and personal care store, gasoline station, clothing and clothing accessory store, sporting goods, hobby and music store, general merchandise store, and a food service and drinking place. The data also indicates that the geographic region is meeting a regional demand for building materials and garden equipment. Utilizing a gap analysis provides an initial indicator for retail and services opportunities for a selected region; therefore further market study and analysis is considered prudent.

Table G.1-3: Oil City (2 Mile Radius) Opportunity Gap & Opportunity Surplus

Oil City (2 Mile Radius) Opportunity Gap – Opportunity Surplus Opportunity Gaps: Opportunities for new or expanded stores. Local resident demand exceeds local store supply of goods or services for the following:

$10.8 million for Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealers (automotive dealers) $3.0 million for Furniture and Home Furnishings $1.1 million for Electronics and Appliances (appliance, electronic, computer and software, camera

equipment stores) $10.1 million for Food and Beverage Store products (grocery, specialty foods, beer, wine, & liquor

stores) $2.5 million for Health and Personal Care Store products (health and personal care merchandise from

fixed point-of-sale locations – which may include Doctors, Physicians, Counselors, as staff) $4.4 million for Gasoline Stations (stations with or without convenience stores) $7.0 million for Clothing and Clothing Accessory products (clothing, shoe, jewelry, luggage, and leather

stores) $2.3 million for Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book, Music products (sporting goods, books, periodical, and

musical instrument stores) $22.8 million for General Merchandise Store products (department stores) $1.7 million for Miscellaneous Store products (florists, office supplies, gifts, and used merchandise

stores) $14.1 million for Non-Store Retailers $12.5 for Food Service and Drinking Places (full service restaurants, limited service restaurants, special

food services, and drinking places)

Opportunity Surplus: Opportunities to meet regional demand. Local store supply of goods and services in this area exceeds local resident demand. This indicates that people from outside the area come here to purchase the following products.

$2.1 million for Building Materials, Garden Equipment Store products

Source: 2010 Claritas Inc., Gap Report

Appendix G

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor Study Final Report October 2010

P a g e | 4

Factors such as location as well as local and regional demand must be further analyzed through a feasibility study by the private sector to validate the potential for the following additional business establishments and number of employees. Current land use regulations with respect to retail favor small to medium sized retail operations.

Table G.1-4: Oil City (2 Mile Radius) Business Overview – Existing Conditions Oil City (2 Mile Radius) Business Overview

Total Total Business Description Establishments Employees Industries (All) 490 6,308 Industries (Private Sector) 376 4,909 Industries (Government and Non-Profit) 114 1,399 Retail (All Retail) 94 568 Building Materials and Garden Supply 5 31 General Merchandise Stores 3 17 Food Stores 12 103 Auto Dealers and Gas Stations 7 31 Apparel and Accessory Stores 3 3 Home Furniture, Furnishings and Equipment 11 35 Eating and Drinking Places 29 243 Miscellaneous Retail Stores 24 105 Service (All) 219 2,111 Hotel and Other Lodging 2 51 Personal Services 44 134 Business Services 31 495 Motion Picture and Amusement 7 19 Health Services 29 166 Legal Services 13 59 Educational Services 14 436 Social Services 28 537 Misc, Membership Orgs and Non-classified 51 214

Source: 2010 Claritas Inc.

Appendix G

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor Study Final Report October 2010

P a g e | 5

Appendix G.1.3: Oil City Surrounding Area (8 Mile Radius) / Gap Analysis Results

The data indicates that Oil City and the Surrounding Area (8 Mile Radius) may be able to support a furniture and home furnishing store, food and beverage store, clothing and clothing accessory store, sporting goods, hobby and music store, general merchandise store, and a food service and drinking place. The data also indicates that Oil City and the Surrounding Area is meeting a regional demand for automotive and tire sales, electronics and appliance stores, building material and garden equipment stores, health and personal care stores, gasoline stations, as well general merchandise stores. Utilizing a gap analysis provides an initial indicator for retail and services opportunities for a selected region, therefore further market study and analysis is considered prudent.

Table G.1-5: Oil City Surrounding Area (8 Mile Radius) Opportunity Gap – Opportunity Surplus Oil City Surrounding Are (8 Mile Radius) Opportunity Gap – Opportunity Surplus

Opportunity Gaps: Opportunities for new or expanded stores. Local resident demand exceeds local store supply of goods or services for the following:

$4.6 million for Furniture and Home Furnishings $12.1 million for Food and Beverage Store products (grocery, specialty foods, beer, wine, & liquor

stores) $9.3 million for Clothing and Clothing Accessory products (clothing, shoe, jewelry, luggage, and leather

stores) $3.7 million for Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book, Music products (sporting goods, books, periodical, and

musical instrument stores) $0.2 million for Miscellaneous Store products (florists, office supplies, gifts, and used merchandise

stores) $26.7 million for Non-Store Retailers $26.6 for Food Service and Drinking Places (full service restaurants, limited service restaurants, special

food services, and drinking places)

Opportunity Surplus: Opportunities to meet regional demand. Local store supply of goods and services in this area exceeds local resident demand. This indicates that people from outside the area come here to purchase the following products.

$17.9 million for Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealers (automotive dealers) $3.9 million for Electronics and Appliances (appliance, electronic, computer and software, camera

equipment stores) $15.9 million for Building Materials, Garden Equipment Store products $1.8 million for Health and Personal Care Store products (health and personal care merchandise from

fixed point-of-sale locations – which may include Doctors, Physicians, Counselors, as staff) $0.3 million for Gasoline Stations (stations with or without convenience stores) $45.5 million for General Merchandise Store products (department stores)

Source: 2010 Claritas Inc., Gap Report

Appendix G

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor Study Final Report October 2010

P a g e | 6

Factors such as location as well as local and regional demand must be further analyzed through a feasibility study by the private sector to validate the potential for the following additional business establishments and number of employees. Current land use regulations with respect to retail favor small to medium sized retail operations.

Table G.1-6: Oil City Surrounding Area (8 Mile Radius) Business Overview – Existing Conditions

Oil City Surrounding Area (8 Mile Radius) Business Overview

Total Total Business Description Establishments Employees Industries (All) 1,601 21,620 Industries (Private Sector) 1,262 17,285 Industries (Government and Non-Profit) 399 4,335 Retail (All Retail) 324 3,861 Building Materials and Garden Supply 16 174 General Merchandise Stores 13 746 Food Stores 29 377 Auto Dealers and Gas Stations 54 415 Apparel and Accessory Stores 11 37 Home Furniture, Furnishings and Equipment 31 128 Eating and Drinking Places 85 1,084 Miscellaneous Retail Stores 85 900 Service (All) 687 7,622 Hotel and Other Lodging 10 138 Personal Services 158 505 Business Services 89 2,029 Motion Picture and Amusement 32 197 Health Services 142 2,297 Legal Services 32 138 Educational Services 30 809 Social Services 71 1,020 Misc, Membership Orgs and Non-classified 123 489

Source: 2010 Claritas Inc.

Ap

pen

dix

G

Rou

te 6

2 S

mart

Tra

nsp

orta

tion

Cor

ridor

Stu

dy

Fin

al R

epor

t O

ctob

er 2

010

Pa

ge

| 7

Ap

pen

dix

G

Rou

te 6

2 S

mart

Tra

nsp

orta

tion

Cor

ridor

Stu

dy

Fin

al R

epor

t O

ctob

er 2

010

Pa

ge

| 8

Appendix G

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor Study Final Report October 2010

P a g e | 9

Appendix G.1.4: Oil City Study Area

Retail Store Type

Appendix G

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor Study Final Report October 2010

P a g e | 10

Source: 2009 Claritas Inc.

Food Away From Home

Source: 2009 Claritas Inc.

Appendix G

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor Study Final Report October 2010

P a g e | 11

Appendix G.1.5: Oil City (2 Mile Radius)

Retail Store Type

Appendix G

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor Study Final Report October 2010

P a g e | 12

Source: 2009 Claritas Inc.

Food Away From Home

Source: 2009 Claritas Inc.

Appendix G

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor Study Final Report October 2010

P a g e | 13

Appendix G.1.6: Oil City Surrounding Area (8 Mile Radius)

Retail Store Type

Appendix G

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor Study Final Report October 2010

P a g e | 14

Note: All Retail Stores Total is NOT the sum of the other line items. Some line items are sub-categories of multiple

line items and could appear in more than one line item. Source: 2009 Claritas Inc.

Food Away From Home

Source: 2009 Claritas Inc.

Appendix H

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor Study Final Report October 2010

Appendix H: Access Management

Introduction to Access Management and Sample Access Management Ordinance for Oil City

Access management is a means of controlling the ways in which vehicles can access major roadways, using techniques such as limiting the number of driveways and intersections with local roadways. Although it involves a sometimes complex balance of the need for local accessibility with the need for overall mobility, properly managed access is vital to the safety and efficiency of your community’s road network. Conversely, when highway access points are not managed effectively, accidents and congestion increase and a community’s quality of life can deteriorate. The Transportation Research Board’s (TRB) Access Management Manual defines access management as: ..the systematic control of the location, spacing, design, and operation of driveways, median openings, interchanges, and street connections to a roadway. It also involves roadway design applications, such as median treatments and auxiliary lanes, and the appropriate spacing of traffic signals. The purpose of access management is to provide vehicular access to land development in a manner that preserves the safety and efficiency of the transportation system. 10 Principals of Access Management

Provide a specialized roadway system Limit direct access to major roadways Promote intersection hierarchy Locate signals to favor through movements Preserve the functional area of intersections and interchanges Limit the number of conflict points Separate conflict areas Remove turning vehicles from through-traffic lanes Use non traversable medians to manage turn movements Provide a supporting street and circulation system

Benefits of Access Management An effectively implemented access management program can improve public safety and reduce traffic congestion. Studies show that as the number of access points increases, crash rates increase. In addition to fatalities and injuries, roadway incidents are responsible for nearly 25 percent of delays. Access management ordinances only apply to new or altered development, not existing homes and businesses, so they will not immediately solve access problems that have already emerged. However, land uses change over time. For example, a house may become a business, or a current use may wish to expand. Having access management ordinances and a plan in place ensures that when changes do occur, sound access management techniques can be instituted. Model Ordinance Tiers The access management practices have been categorized into three tiers of model ordinance language based on ease of implementation; timeline to achieve desired outcomes; and the level of coordination required between the municipality, property owners, affected stakeholders, and PennDOT.

Tier 1 Tier 1 practices relate to the number and location of driveways and basic design elements that should be evaluated for every access. These practices should be implemented during the land development approval process and require coordination between the municipality, property owner, and possibly PennDOT. Additional practices such as shared driveways and internal access to outparcels attempt to consolidate access points among adjacent property owners. The practices included in this tier are generally the easiest to implement because they cost the least, take the least time to implement, and require the least amount of coordination between the property owner, municipality, and PennDOT. • Number of Driveways • Corner Clearance • Safe Sight Distance • Driveway Channelization • Joint and Cross Access • Access to Outparcels • Driveway Throat Length • Driveway Throat Width • Driveway Radius • Driveway Profile

Tier 2 Tier 2 practices involve more complex design elements for individual driveways, such as left turn lanes and deceleration lanes. Other practices, such as driveway and signalized intersection spacing, involve multiple driveways or off-site intersections. The practices in this tier can be implemented during the land development approval process, but they could require a higher level of coordination among the municipality, multiple property owners, and PennDOT. Some of the practices could require implementation through multiple land development approvals or a comprehensive project involving several properties. The practices in this tier can be more costly and require a longer period of time to implement than the practices in Tier 1 due to the participation of multiple property owners. • Auxiliary Lanes • Left Turn Lane • Acceleration Lane • Driveway Spacing • Signalized Intersection Spacing • Driveway Clearance from Interchange Ramps

Tier 3 Tier 3 includes roadway design and planning practices such as medians, two-way center left turn lanes, setbacks, frontage roads involving multiple driveways, intersections, and properties. These practices cover a much larger corridor or area and typically require the highest degree of coordination among property owners, the municipality, and PennDOT. In addition, this tier contains planning and regulatory tools such as the official map and zoning overlay districts to implement these types of practices. In most situations, these practices would require capital funding for implementation. These types of practices could require years to fully implement. These practices are more expensive, require much higher levels

of coordination between stakeholders, and much more time to implement than Tier 1 and Tier 2 practices. • Overlay Districts • Official Map • Two-way Left Turn Lanes • Frontage/Service Roads • Non-traversable Medians • Setbacks • Bonuses and Incentives • Pre-existing Access

References Access Management Model Ordinances for Pennsylvania Municipalities Handbook, PennDOT Access Management Manual, Transportation Research Board

ACCESS MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE FOR OIL CITY (adapted from Access Management Model Ordinances for Pennsylvania Municipalities Handbook, PennDOT)

Purpose The purpose of this ordinance is to provide vehicular access to land development in a manner that preserves the safety and efficiency of the transportation system. Access management encompasses the careful planning of the location, design and operation of driveways, median openings, interchanges, and street connections. If access systems are not properly designed, the primary transportation network, including arterials and highways, will be unable to accommodate the access needs of development and retain their primary transportation function. This ordinance is intended to promote safe and efficient travel within Oil City by limiting the number of conflict points, providing safe spacing standards between driveways, encouraging shared access between abutting properties, and ensuring safe access by emergency vehicles.

Applicability This ordinance shall apply to all arterials and collectors within the City, as identified herein, and to all properties which abut these roadways. List proposed streets

Conformance with Plans, Regulations, and Statutes This ordinance is generally consistent with of the comprehensive plan for Oil City. This ordinance also conforms with the requirements of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code and meets or exceeds the standards contained in Title 67, Chapter 441 of the Pennsylvania Code titled, Access To And Occupancy Of Highways By Driveways And Local Roads.”

Definitions 85th Percentile Speed – The speed, in miles per hour, which is exceeded by only 15 percent of the drivers traveling on a section of highway.

95th Percentile Queue Length - The queue exceeded at some point during 5 percent of the signal cycles.

Access – A driveway, street, or other means of passage of vehicles between the highway and abutting property, including acceleration and deceleration lanes and such drainage structures as may be necessary for proper construction and maintenance thereof. [67 PA Code Chapter 441]

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) – The total volume of traffic during a number of whole days (more than one day) and less than one year divided by the number of days in that period.

Design Speed – The maximum safe speed that can be maintained over a section of roadway when conditions are so favorable that the design features of the road govern.

Driveway – Every entrance or exit used by vehicular traffic to or from properties abutting a highway. The term includes proposed streets, lanes, alleys, courts, and ways. [67 PA Code Chapter 441]

Egress – The exit of vehicular traffic from abutting properties to a street.

Functional Area – The area beyond the physical intersection of two controlled access facilities that comprises decision and maneuver distance, and the required vehicle storage lengths.

High Volume Driveway – A driveway used or expected to be used by more than 1,500 vehicles per day. [67 PA Code Chapter 441]

Highways, Roads, or Streets – any highways, roads, or streets identified on the legally adopted municipal street or highway plan or the official map that carry vehicular traffic, together with all necessary appurtenances, including bridges, rights-of- way and traffic control improvements. The term shall not include the Interstate Highway System.

Ingress – The entrance of vehicular traffic to abutting properties from a street.

Internal Trips – Site-generated trips that occur between two or more land uses on the subject site without exiting onto the intersecting street.

Level of Service (LOS) – A qualitative measure describing the operational conditions within a section of roadway or at an intersection that includes factors such as speed, travel time, ability to maneuver, traffic interruptions, delay, and driver comfort. Level of service is described as a letter grade system (similar to a school grading system) where delay (in seconds) is equivalent to a certain letter grade from A through F.

Local Road – Every public highway other than a state highway. The term includes existing streets, lanes, alleys, courts, and ways. [67 PA Code Chapter 441]

Low Volume Driveway – A driveway used or expected to be used by more than 25 but less than 750 vehicles per day. [67 PA Code Chapter 441]

Medium Volume Driveway – A driveway used or expected to be used by more than 750 but less than 1,500 vehicles per day. [67 PA Code Chapter 441]

Minimum Use Driveway – A residential or other driveway that is used or expected to be used by not more than 25 vehicles per day. [67 PA Code Chapter 441]

Outparcel – A lot that is adjacent to the roadway that interrupts the frontage of another lot.

Pre-Existing Driveway – Permitted driveways in place at the time of the adoption of this ordinance that do not conform to the standards herein.

Right-of-Way – An area of land, measured from the centerline of the cartway that can be used by the public for travel and the location of utilities.

Right-of-Way Preservation – The acquisition of an area of land, through dedication or easement, needed to accommodate the future widening of the roadway.

Stopping Sight Distance – The distance required by a driver traveling at a given speed to stop the vehicle after an object on the roadway becomes visible to the driver.

Street – Includes street, avenue, boulevard, road, highway, freeway, parkway, lane, alley, viaduct, and any other ways used or intended to be used by vehicular traffic or pedestrians, whether private or public.

Trip – A one-directional vehicular trip to or from a site.

Trip Generation – The total number of vehicular trips going to and from a particular land use on a specific site during a specific time period.

A. Driveways

1) Number of Driveways

a) Only one access shall be permitted for a property.

b) An additional access or accesses shall be permitted if the applicant demonstrates that an additional access or additional accesses are necessary to accommodate traffic to and from the site and it can be achieved in a safe and efficient manner.

c) The municipality shall restrict access to right turn only ingress and egress or to another state maintained road or local road if safe and efficient movements cannot be accommodated.

d) For a property that abuts two or more roadways, the municipality may restrict access to only that roadway that can more safely and efficiently accommodate traffic.

e) If the municipality anticipates that a property may be subdivided and that the subdivision may result in an unacceptable number or arrangement of driveways, or both, the municipality shall require the property owner to enter into an access covenant to restrict future access.

2) Corner Clearance

a) Corner clearance shall meet the following driveway spacing standards that are desirable for arterial and major collector roads:

i) Principal arterial: 600 feet

ii) Minor arterial: 400 feet

iii) Major collector: 200 feet

b) Access shall be provided to the roadway where corner clearance requirements can be achieved.

c) If the minimum driveway spacing standards cannot be achieved due to constraints, the following shall apply in all cases:

i) There shall be a minimum 10-foot tangent distance between the end of the intersecting roadway radius and the beginning radius of a permitted driveway.

ii) The distance from the nearest edge of cartway of an intersecting roadway to the beginning radius of a permitted driveway shall be a minimum of 30 feet.

d) If no other reasonable access to the property is available, and no reasonable alternative is identified, the driveway shall be located the farthest possible distance from the intersecting roadway. In such cases, directional connections (i.e., right in/right out only, right in only or right out only) may be required.

e) The municipality shall require restrictions at the driveway if the municipal engineer determines that the location of the driveway and particular ingress or egress movements will create safety or operational problems.

3) Safe Sight Distance

a) Safe sight distance shall be available for all permitted turning movements at all driveway intersections.

b) PennDOT’s Pub. 441 and Pub. 282 for driveways or Pub. 70 for local roads shall be referenced to determine minimum driveway and roadway intersection safe sight distance requirements.

c) All driveways and intersecting roadways shall be designed and located so that the sight distance is optimized to the degree possible without jeopardizing other requirements such as intersection spacing, and at least minimum sight distance requirements are met.

4) Driveway Channelization

a) For high and medium volume driveways, channelization islands and medians shall be used to separate conflicting traffic movements into specified lanes to facilitate orderly movements for vehicles and pedestrians.

b) Where it is found to be necessary to restrict particular turning movements at a driveway, due to the potential disruption to the orderly flow of traffic or a result of sight distance constraints, the municipality may require a raised channelization island.

c) Raised channelization islands shall be designed with criteria consistent with the latest AASHTO publication entitled A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets.

5) Joint and Cross Access

a) The municipality may require a joint driveway in order to achieve the following driveway spacing standards that are desirable for arterial and major collector roads:

i) Principal arterial: 600 feet

ii) Minor arterial: 400 feet

iii) Major collector: 200 feet

b) Adjacent non-residential properties shall provide a joint or cross access driveway to allow circulation between sites wherever feasible along roadways classified as major collectors or arterials in accordance with the functional classification contained in the municipal comprehensive plan. The following shall apply to joint and cross access driveways:

i) The driveway shall have a design speed of 10 mph and have sufficient width to accommodate two-way traffic including the largest vehicle expected to frequently access the properties.

ii) A circulation plan that may include coordinated or shared parking shall be required.

iii) Features shall be included in the design to make it visually obvious that abutting properties shall be tied in to provide cross access.

c) The property owners along a joint or cross access driveway shall:

i) Record an easement with the deed allowing cross access to and from other properties served by the driveway.

ii) Record an agreement with the municipality so that future access rights along the driveway shall be granted at the discretion of the municipality and the design shall be approved by the municipal engineer.

iii) Record a joint agreement with the deed defining the maintenance responsibilities of each of the property owners located along the driveway.

6) Access to Outparcels

a) For commercial and office developments under the same ownership and consolidated for the purposes of development or phased developments comprised of more than one building site, the municipality shall require that the development be served by an internal road that is separated from the main roadway.

b) All access to outparcels shall be internalized using the internal roadway.

c) The driveways for outparcels shall be designed to allow safe and efficient ingress and egress movements from the internal road.

d) The internal circulation roads shall be designed to avoid excessive queuing across parking aisles.

e) The design of the internal road shall be in accordance with all other sections of this ordinance.

f) All necessary easements and agreements required under Section A.6.c shall be met.

g) A municipality may require an access covenant to restrict an outparcel to internal access only.

B. Driveway Design Elements

1) Driveway Throat Length

a) For minimum use driveways, the throat length shall be a minimum of 25 feet.

b) For low volume driveways, the throat length shall be a minimum of 50 feet or as determined by queuing analysis.

c) For medium volume driveways, the throat length shall be a minimum of 120 feet or as determined by a queuing analysis.

d) For high volume driveways, the throat length shall be a minimum of 150 feet or as determined by a queuing analysis.

2) Driveway Throat Width

a) For driveways without curb:

i) A minimum use driveway shall have a minimum width of 10 feet.

ii) Low and medium volume driveways shall have a minimum width of 10 feet for one-way operation and a minimum width of 20 feet for two-way operation.

iii) The design of high volume driveways shall be based on analyses to determine the number of required lanes.

b) For driveways with curb, two feet should be added to the widths contained in Section a.i and a.ii.

c) The municipality may require additional driveway width to provide turning lanes for adequate traffic flow and safety.

d) The municipality may require that the driveway design include a median to control turning movements. Where medians are required or permitted, the minimum width of the median shall be four feet to provide adequate clearance for signs.

3) Driveway Radius

a) The following criteria shall apply to driveway radii:

i) For minimum use driveways, the radii shall be a minimum of 15 feet.

ii) For low volume driveways, the radii shall be a minimum of 15 feet uncurbed and 25 feet curbed.

iii) For medium volume driveways, the radii shall be a minimum of 15 feet uncurbed and 25 feet curbed.

iv) For high volume driveways, the design should be reviewed by the municipal engineer on municipal roadways and PennDOT on state maintained roadways.

b) For all driveways, the radii shall be designed to accommodate the largest vehicle expected to frequently use the driveway.

c) Except for joint driveways, no portion of a driveway radius may be located on or along the frontage of an adjacent property.

4) Driveway Profile

a) Driveway grade requirements where curb is not present on the intersecting street:

i) Shoulder slopes vary from four percent to six percent. When shoulders are present, the existing shoulder slope shall be maintained across the full shoulder width.

ii) The change in grade between the cross slope of the connecting roadway or shoulder and the driveway shall not exceed eight percent.

iii) The driveway grade shall not exceed eight percent within 10 feet of the edge of travel lane for minimum use driveways and within 40 feet for low, medium, and high volume driveways.

iv) A 40-foot minimum vertical curve should be used for a high volume driveway.

b) Driveway grade requirements where curbs and sidewalks are present:

i) The difference between the cross slope of the roadway and the grade of the driveway apron may not exceed eight percent.

ii) The driveway grade shall not exceed eight percent within 10 feet of the edge of travel lane for minimum use driveways and within 40 feet for low, medium, and high volume driveways.

iii) If a planted area exists between the sidewalk and curb, the following shall apply:

(1) The grade of the planted area shall not exceed eight percent.

(2) If the driveway grade would exceed eight percent in the area between the curb and the sidewalk, the outer edge (street side) of the sidewalk may be depressed to enable the driveway grade to stay within eight percent. A maximum sidewalk cross slope of eight percent must be maintained.

(3) If the sidewalk cross slope exceeds two percent, the entire sidewalk may be depressed. The longitudinal grade of the sidewalk may not exceed six percent.

c) Although site conditions may not allow strict adherence to these guidelines in this ordinance, every effort should be made to design and construct the safest and most efficient access onto the municipal or state roadway.

C. TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDIES A transportation impact study is an engineering study that evaluates the effect that traffic generated by a proposed development would have on surrounding roadway operations, and determines the improvements to the existing transportation system necessary to accommodate that traffic. A transportation impact study should be completed when thresholds are met based on the size of the development and its impact on adjacent access points and intersections. An application for access to a development shall include a traffic impact study if:

The access is expected to have an average daily traffic volume of 3,000 or more,

During any one-hour time period, the development is expected to generate either 100 or more new vehicle trips entering the development or 100 or more new vehicle trips exiting the development, or

In the opinion of the City Planner, the development is expected to have a significant impact on highway safety or traffic flow even though it does not meet 1 or 2 above.

All transportation impact studies are to be prepared in accordance with the latest PennDOT requirements for Transportation Impact Studies.

Appendix I

Route 62 Smart Transportation Corridor Study Final Report October 2010

Appendix I: Traffic Signal Warrant Analyses

FOUR HOUR VOLUME WARRANT

Municipality: Analyst:County: TPD Project #:

Condition:Lanes Speed

1 351

Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right32 0 8 98 0 226 0 163 0 0 270 026 0 4 112 0 192 0 145 0 0 276 032 0 6 200 0 273 0 194 0 0 485 030 0 12 184 0 228 0 159 0 0 410 0

1 7:00-8:00 A.M.2 8:00-9:00 A.M.3 4:00-5:00 P.M.4 5:00-6:00 P.M.56

MUTCD Warrant 3 - Four Hour Volume

Major Street Volume Minor Street Volume Minor Street Warrant Meets Warrant?Results

Direction2009

Condition

North-SouthEast-West

M. MudryNPPD.A.00002

296679569

473yes

290324304

412

433421

7:00-8:00 A.M.8:00-9:00 A.M.

yesyes

189228

yes

NoNo

Southbound

Normal values apply

Hour

MUTCD Warrant 3 - Four Hour Volume

Volume Level Criteria1. Is the critical speed of major street > 40 mph?2. Is the intersection in a built-up area of isolated community of <10,000 population?

Eastbound Westbound Northbound

4:00-5:00 P.M.5:00-6:00 P.M.

Minor Street:Major Street:

Traffic Signal Warrant Summary

Petroleum StreetFront Street

Oil CityVenango

Street Name

12

3

4

0

100

200

300

400

500

300 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500

Min

or S

tree

t -H

igh

Volu

me

Appr

oach

(vph

)

Major Street - Total of Both Approaches (vph)

Municipality: Analyst:County: TPD Project #:

Condition:Lanes Speed

2 251

Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right0 0 0 5 195 208 0 119 0 0 246 1130 0 0 6 200 246 0 133 0 0 298 1320 0 0 18 265 422 0 132 0 0 409 2110 0 0 21 251 395 0 140 0 0 364 211

1 7:00-8:00 A.M.2 8:00-9:00 A.M.3 4:00-5:00 P.M.4 5:00-6:00 P.M.56

Traffic Signal Warrant SummaryMUTCD Warrant 3 - Four Hour Volume

Oil City M. MudryVenango NPPD.A.000022009

Street Name DirectionMajor Street: State Street North-SouthMinor Street: Front Street East-West

Volume Level Criteria1. Is the critical speed of major street > 40 mph? No2. Is the intersection in a built-up area of isolated community of <10,000 population? No

Normal values apply

MUTCD Warrant 3 - Four Hour Volume

Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

7:00-8:00 A.M.8:00-9:00 A.M.4:00-5:00 P.M.5:00-6:00 P.M.

ResultsCondition Major Street Volume Minor Street Volume Minor Street Warrant Meets Warrant?

478 408 347 yes563 452 300 yes752 705 218 yes715 667 232 yes

1

2

0

100

200

300

400

500

300 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500

Min

or S

tree

t -H

igh

Volu

me

Appr

oach

(vph

)

Major Street - Total of Both Approaches (vph)

Municipality: Analyst:County: TPD Project #:

Condition:Lanes Speed

2 252

Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right0 0 0 0 391 0 107 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 328 0 155 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 450 0 294 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 427 0 226 0 0 0 0 0

1 7:00-8:00 A.M.2 8:00-9:00 A.M.3 4:00-5:00 P.M.4 5:00-6:00 P.M.56

Traffic Signal Warrant SummaryMUTCD Warrant 3 - Four Hour Volume

Oil City M. MudryVenango NPPD.A.000022009

Street Name DirectionMajor Street: Front Street East-WestMinor Street: Wilson Street North-South

Volume Level Criteria1. Is the critical speed of major street > 40 mph? No2. Is the intersection in a built-up area of isolated community of <10,000 population? No

Normal values apply

MUTCD Warrant 3 - Four Hour Volume

Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

7:00-8:00 A.M.8:00-9:00 A.M.4:00-5:00 P.M.5:00-6:00 P.M.

ResultsCondition Major Street Volume Minor Street Volume Minor Street Warrant Meets Warrant?

391 107 529 no328 155 582 no450 294 490 no427 226 507 no

1

2

3

4

0

100

200

300

400

500

300 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500

Min

or S

tree

t -H

igh

Volu

me

Appr

oach

(vph

)

Major Street - Total of Both Approaches (vph)

Municipality: Analyst:County: TPD Project #:

Condition:Lanes Speed

1 251

Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right143 126 4 0 0 0 6 16 3 142 31 202120 163 4 0 0 0 4 24 1 153 28 205164 148 1 0 0 0 11 31 7 300 50 339140 165 3 0 0 0 4 27 4 280 40 291

1 7:00-8:00 A.M.2 8:00-9:00 A.M.3 4:00-5:00 P.M.4 5:00-6:00 P.M.56

Traffic Signal Warrant SummaryMUTCD Warrant 3 - Four Hour Volume

Oil City M. MudryVenango NPPD.A.000022009

Street Name DirectionMajor Street: Petroleum Street North-SouthMinor Street: First Street East-West

Volume Level Criteria1. Is the critical speed of major street > 40 mph? No2. Is the intersection in a built-up area of isolated community of <10,000 population? No

Normal values apply

MUTCD Warrant 3 - Four Hour Volume

Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

7:00-8:00 A.M.8:00-9:00 A.M.4:00-5:00 P.M.5:00-6:00 P.M.

ResultsCondition Major Street Volume Minor Street Volume Minor Street Warrant Meets Warrant?

400 273 308 no415 287 300 no738 313 170 yes646 308 200 yes

12

34

0

100

200

300

400

500

300 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500

Min

or S

tree

t -H

igh

Volu

me

Appr

oach

(vph

)

Major Street - Total of Both Approaches (vph)

Municipality: Analyst:County: TPD Project #:

Condition:Lanes Speed

1 251

Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right10 223 8 0 0 0 0 62 73 9 37 013 267 20 0 0 0 0 49 78 25 41 026 322 45 0 0 0 0 55 95 55 118 023 353 55 0 0 0 0 46 81 38 74 0

1 7:00-8:00 A.M.2 8:00-9:00 A.M.3 4:00-5:00 P.M.4 5:00-6:00 P.M.56

Traffic Signal Warrant SummaryMUTCD Warrant 3 - Four Hour Volume

Oil City M. MudryVenango NPPD.A.000022009

Street Name DirectionMajor Street: First Street East-WestMinor Street: Central Street North-South

Volume Level Criteria1. Is the critical speed of major street > 40 mph? No2. Is the intersection in a built-up area of isolated community of <10,000 population? No

Normal values apply

MUTCD Warrant 3 - Four Hour Volume

Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

7:00-8:00 A.M.8:00-9:00 A.M.4:00-5:00 P.M.5:00-6:00 P.M.

ResultsCondition Major Street Volume Minor Street Volume Minor Street Warrant Meets Warrant?

241 135 422 no300 127 373 no393 173 312 no431 127 291 no

2

3

4

0

100

200

300

400

500

300 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500

Min

or S

tree

t -H

igh

Volu

me

Appr

oach

(vph

)

Major Street - Total of Both Approaches (vph)

Municipality: Analyst:County: TPD Project #:

Condition:Lanes Speed

1 251

Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right112 171 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 245 12 0138 200 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 284 12 0140 306 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 369 45 0141 276 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 345 30 0

1 7:00-8:00 A.M.2 8:00-9:00 A.M.3 4:00-5:00 P.M.4 5:00-6:00 P.M.56

Traffic Signal Warrant SummaryMUTCD Warrant 3 - Four Hour Volume

Oil City M. MudryVenango NPPD.A.000022009

Street Name DirectionMajor Street: First Street East-WestMinor Street: State Street North-South

Volume Level Criteria1. Is the critical speed of major street > 40 mph? No2. Is the intersection in a built-up area of isolated community of <10,000 population? No

Normal values apply

MUTCD Warrant 3 - Four Hour Volume

Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

7:00-8:00 A.M.8:00-9:00 A.M.4:00-5:00 P.M.5:00-6:00 P.M.

ResultsCondition Major Street Volume Minor Street Volume Minor Street Warrant Meets Warrant?

285 257 384 no345 296 341 no467 414 273 yes442 375 285 yes

2

3

4

0

100

200

300

400

500

300 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500

Min

or S

tree

t -H

igh

Volu

me

Appr

oach

(vph

)

Major Street - Total of Both Approaches (vph)

Municipality: Analyst:County: TPD Project #:

Condition:Lanes Speed

2 252

Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right8 302 118 0 0 0 0 115 3 0 0 09 344 147 0 0 0 0 137 3 0 0 0

28 488 265 0 0 0 0 277 2 0 0 013 441 213 0 0 0 0 223 2 0 0 0

1 7:00-8:00 A.M.2 8:00-9:00 A.M.3 4:00-5:00 P.M.4 5:00-6:00 P.M.56

Traffic Signal Warrant SummaryMUTCD Warrant 3 - Four Hour Volume

Oil City M. MudryVenango NPPD.A.000022009

Street Name DirectionMajor Street: First Street East-WestMinor Street: Wilson Street North-South

Volume Level Criteria1. Is the critical speed of major street > 40 mph? No2. Is the intersection in a built-up area of isolated community of <10,000 population? No

Normal values apply

MUTCD Warrant 3 - Four Hour Volume

Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

7:00-8:00 A.M.8:00-9:00 A.M.4:00-5:00 P.M.5:00-6:00 P.M.

ResultsCondition Major Street Volume Minor Street Volume Minor Street Warrant Meets Warrant?

428 118 497 no500 140 455 no781 279 288 no667 225 349 no

12

3

4

0

100

200

300

400

500

300 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500

Min

or S

tree

t -H

igh

Volu

me

Appr

oach

(vph

)

Major Street - Total of Both Approaches (vph)

PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT

Municipality: Analyst:County: TPD Project #:

Lanes Speed1 351

Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right33 0 11 145 0 228 0 186 0 0 276 032 0 7 196 0 272 0 202 0 0 502 0

1 2009 AM2 2009 PM3456

2009 PM

No

North-SouthEast-West

M. MudryNPPD.A.00002

2003 MUTCD Warrant 3B - Peak Hour Volume

100

Major Street Volume Minor Street Volume Minor Street Warrant443373

468462704

100

noyes

yesyes

100100

yesyes

322

Southbound

Normal values apply

Condition

Results

2009 AM

Condition

2003 MUTCD Warrant 3B - Peak Hour Volume

Volume Level Criteria1. Is the critical speed of major street > 40 mph?2. Is the intersection in a built-up area of isolated community of <10,000 population?

Eastbound Westbound Northbound

No

Meets Warrant?

Minor Street:Major Street:

Traffic Signal Warrant Summary

Petroleum StreetFront Street

Oil CityVenango

Street Name Direction

1

2

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

300 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700

Min

or S

tree

t -H

igh

Volu

me

Appr

oach

(vph

)

Major Street - Total of Both Approaches (vph)

Oil city 2009 Peak Hour Volume Warrants.xls 7/19/2010 11:01 AM

Municipality: Analyst:County: TPD Project #:

Lanes Speed1 251

Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right0 0 0 65 326 0 52 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 167 388 0 82 0 0 0 0 0

1 2009 AM2 2009 PM3456

Traffic Signal Warrant Summary2003 MUTCD Warrant 3B - Peak Hour Volume

Oil City M. MudryVenango NPPD.A.00002

Street Name DirectionMajor Street: Front Street East-WestMinor Street: Central Avenue North-South

Volume Level Criteria1. Is the critical speed of major street > 40 mph? No2. Is the intersection in a built-up area of isolated community of <10,000 population? No

Normal values apply

2003 MUTCD Warrant 3B - Peak Hour Volume

Condition Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

2009 AM2009 PM

ResultsCondition Major Street Volume Minor Street Volume Minor Street Warrant Meets Warrant?

391 52 484 no555 82 394 no

100 yes100 yes100 yes100 yes

12

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

300 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700

Min

or S

tree

t -H

igh

Volu

me

Appr

oach

(vph

)

Major Street - Total of Both Approaches (vph)

Oil city 2009 Peak Hour Volume Warrants.xls 7/19/2010 11:01 AM

Municipality: Analyst:County: TPD Project #:

Lanes Speed2 251

Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right0 0 0 6 235 323 0 133 0 0 289 1630 0 0 19 309 430 0 137 0 0 415 239

1 2009 AM2 2009 PM3456

Traffic Signal Warrant Summary2003 MUTCD Warrant 3B - Peak Hour Volume

Oil City M. MudryVenango NPPD.A.00002

Street Name DirectionMajor Street: State Street North-SouthMinor Street: Front Street East-West

Volume Level Criteria1. Is the critical speed of major street > 40 mph? No2. Is the intersection in a built-up area of isolated community of <10,000 population? No

Normal values apply

2003 MUTCD Warrant 3B - Peak Hour Volume

Condition Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

2009 AM2009 PM

ResultsCondition Major Street Volume Minor Street Volume Minor Street Warrant Meets Warrant?

585 564 474 yes791 758 374 yes

100 yes100 yes100 yes100 yes

1

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

300 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700

Min

or S

tree

t -H

igh

Volu

me

Appr

oach

(vph

)

Major Street - Total of Both Approaches (vph)

Oil city 2009 Peak Hour Volume Warrants.xls 7/19/2010 11:01 AM

Municipality: Analyst:County: TPD Project #:

Lanes Speed2 252

Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right0 0 0 0 415 0 159 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 463 0 285 0 0 0 0 0

1 2009 AM2 2009 PM3456

Traffic Signal Warrant Summary2003 MUTCD Warrant 3B - Peak Hour Volume

Oil City M. MudryVenango NPPD.A.00002

Street Name DirectionMajor Street: Front Street East-WestMinor Street: Wilson Street North-South

Volume Level Criteria1. Is the critical speed of major street > 40 mph? No2. Is the intersection in a built-up area of isolated community of <10,000 population? No

Normal values apply

2003 MUTCD Warrant 3B - Peak Hour Volume

Condition Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

2009 AM2009 PM

ResultsCondition Major Street Volume Minor Street Volume Minor Street Warrant Meets Warrant?

415 159 727 no463 285 693 no

150 yes150 yes150 yes150 yes

1

2

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

300 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700

Min

or S

tree

t -H

igh

Volu

me

Appr

oach

(vph

)

Major Street - Total of Both Approaches (vph)

Oil city 2009 Peak Hour Volume Warrants.xls 7/19/2010 11:01 AM

Municipality: Analyst:County: TPD Project #:

Lanes Speed1 251

Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right159 153 6 0 0 0 7 24 1 141 34 257174 151 3 0 0 0 6 34 6 318 52 341

1 2009 AM2 2009 PM3456

Traffic Signal Warrant Summary2003 MUTCD Warrant 3B - Peak Hour Volume

Oil City M. MudryVenango NPPD.A.00002

Street Name DirectionMajor Street: Petroleum Street North-SouthMinor Street: First Street East-West

Volume Level Criteria1. Is the critical speed of major street > 40 mph? No2. Is the intersection in a built-up area of isolated community of <10,000 population? No

Normal values apply

2003 MUTCD Warrant 3B - Peak Hour Volume

Condition Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

2009 AM2009 PM

ResultsCondition Major Street Volume Minor Street Volume Minor Street Warrant Meets Warrant?

464 318 442 no757 328 299 yes

100 yes100 yes100 yes100 yes

1 2

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

300 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700

Min

or S

tree

t -H

igh

Volu

me

Appr

oach

(vph

)

Major Street - Total of Both Approaches (vph)

Oil city 2009 Peak Hour Volume Warrants.xls 7/19/2010 11:01 AM

Municipality: Analyst:County: TPD Project #:

Lanes Speed1 251

Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right13 275 13 0 0 0 0 48 87 15 49 026 395 55 0 0 0 0 48 83 80 82 0

1 2009 AM2 2009 PM3456

Traffic Signal Warrant Summary2003 MUTCD Warrant 3B - Peak Hour Volume

Oil City M. MudryVenango NPPD.A.00002

Street Name DirectionMajor Street: First Street East-WestMinor Street: Central Street North-South

Volume Level Criteria1. Is the critical speed of major street > 40 mph? No2. Is the intersection in a built-up area of isolated community of <10,000 population? No

Normal values apply

2003 MUTCD Warrant 3B - Peak Hour Volume

Condition Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

2009 AM2009 PM

ResultsCondition Major Street Volume Minor Street Volume Minor Street Warrant Meets Warrant?

301 135 538 no476 162 435 no

100 yes100 yes100 yes100 yes

12

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

300 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700

Min

or S

tree

t -H

igh

Volu

me

Appr

oach

(vph

)

Major Street - Total of Both Approaches (vph)

Oil city 2009 Peak Hour Volume Warrants.xls 7/19/2010 11:01 AM

Municipality: Analyst:County: TPD Project #:

Lanes Speed1 251

Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right138 260 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 284 12 0142 390 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 383 44 0

1 2009 AM2 2009 PM3456

Traffic Signal Warrant Summary2003 MUTCD Warrant 3B - Peak Hour Volume

Oil City M. MudryVenango NPPD.A.00002

Street Name DirectionMajor Street: First Street East-WestMinor Street: State Street North-South

Volume Level Criteria1. Is the critical speed of major street > 40 mph? No2. Is the intersection in a built-up area of isolated community of <10,000 population? No

Normal values apply

2003 MUTCD Warrant 3B - Peak Hour Volume

Condition Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

2009 AM2009 PM

ResultsCondition Major Street Volume Minor Street Volume Minor Street Warrant Meets Warrant?

405 296 476 no555 427 394 yes

100 yes100 yes100 yes100 yes

1

2

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

300 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700

Min

or S

tree

t -H

igh

Volu

me

Appr

oach

(vph

)

Major Street - Total of Both Approaches (vph)

Oil city 2009 Peak Hour Volume Warrants.xls 7/19/2010 11:01 AM

Municipality: Analyst:County: TPD Project #:

Lanes Speed2 252

Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right12 374 150 0 0 0 0 147 2 0 0 028 488 265 0 0 0 0 257 2 0 0 0

1 2009 AM2 2009 PM3456

Traffic Signal Warrant Summary2003 MUTCD Warrant 3B - Peak Hour Volume

Oil City M. MudryVenango NPPD.A.00002

Street Name DirectionMajor Street: First Street East-WestMinor Street: Wilson Street North-South

Volume Level Criteria1. Is the critical speed of major street > 40 mph? No2. Is the intersection in a built-up area of isolated community of <10,000 population? No

Normal values apply

2003 MUTCD Warrant 3B - Peak Hour Volume

Condition Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound

2009 AM2009 PM

ResultsCondition Major Street Volume Minor Street Volume Minor Street Warrant Meets Warrant?

536 149 643 no781 259 491 no

150 yes150 yes150 yes150 yes

1

2

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

300 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700

Min

or S

tree

t -H

igh

Volu

me

Appr

oach

(vph

)

Major Street - Total of Both Approaches (vph)

Oil city 2009 Peak Hour Volume Warrants.xls 7/19/2010 11:01 AM

Route 62Smart Transportation Study

imagination. innovation. involvement. impact.

October 2010