Upload
open-science-summit
View
256
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
Open Source Sensing:
Can we have both privacy and safety?
Christine PetersonForesight Institutewww.foresight.org
"The best weapon of a dictatorship is secrecy, but the best weapon of a democracy should be the weapon of openness."
—Niels Bohr
No Secret Software for Public Voting
Data! The E-voting mess —The Open Science
community could have nipped it in the bud.
One molecule
Nanotech can do it now too
the sensors are coming
Nanotech-based sensors
“The detector generates a continuous 'spectrum' of information about any chemical agents in its presence...”
“easily programmable”
Sewer monitoring has begun
“The test doesn’t screen people directly but instead seeks out evidence of illicit drug abuse in drug residues and metabolites excreted in urine and flushed toward municipal sewage treatment plants.”
“We found a drug molecule — Everybody out for a breath check!”
Things worth detecting: weapons of mass destruction
• Explosives, chemicals, nukes — today
• Bioweapons – in early stages — nasty, but delicate and hard to control)
• Nanoweapons — later — like bioweapons, but tougher and more controllable)
Time
GDP per capita goes up
Cost of WMD comes down
$
Technological Advance
Fear + poor WMD data =
Sudan pharmaceutical plant, August 1998
Result: more surveillanceElectronic, video, biological, chemicalBeing integrated into national system
Transparency vs privacy
DC doesn’t notice our debates — they just move forward
Top-down approach to bottom-up problem
• Centralized
• Mandatory
• Monolithic
• Limited in participation
• Secretive
• Leads toward Surveillance State
Open Science-stylephysical security
• Decentralized
• Minimal
• Voluntary/privatized
• Experimental
• Collaborative
• Open
• Transparent
“Track the problem, not the people”
Who can figure out whether & how to collect
public sensing data?• Need a community that understands the
relationships between:
• Security
• Privacy
• Functionality
• Freedom
Graphic: Gina Miller
Open Sensing-based Security: What would it be like?
• Open source style development
• Citizen controlled
• Privacy oriented
• Verifiably limited
• Detects materials of concern
• Does not track individuals or nonweapons (e.g. drugs)
What might we regard as worth detecting?
• Real problems
• Anthrax (NYC, DC, FL 2001)
• Sarin (Tokyo, 1995)
• Ricin (London 2002, Las Vegas 2008)
• Later: syn bio accidents or abuse
Who gets the data?
• Communities negotiate
• Mutual data exchange, e.g. anthrax within 100 km
• Agreements on how to treat the data
• “Communities” size can vary from household to nation, depending on what is detected (e.g., TNT vs nukes)
Do we not have a “freedom to sense”?
Proposed law in New York City that will require people to get a license before they can buy
chemical, biological, or radiological
attack detectors
NO SECRET SOFTWARE FOR PUBLIC SENSING
DATA!
Open Source Sensing
orthe Open Science waythe fed way
Open sensing • OpenSourceSensing.org
• Email me: [email protected]
No Secret Software for
Public Sensing Data!