Upload
eric-britton-world-streets
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
1/67
UNDP Government of Malaysia
Project
Support for the development ofaccessible public transport in
Penang
Kit Mitchell
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
2/67
Peninsula Malaysia
Penang
Island
Rest of Pulau
Pinang
Thailand
Singapore
Viet Nam
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
3/67
Penang Island
George TownWorld HeritageSite
Airport
Industrial areas
Tourist beacharea
Mountain
10 miles
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
4/67
Penang Island
Area 285 sq. km.Total population 500,000+
Old George Town 220,000Greater urban area 400,000
Mainland part of StateArea 753 sq. km.
Population 800,000
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
5/67
Old George Town is mainly low-rise
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
6/67
Old George Town is mainly low-rise
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
7/67
George Town is a World Heritage Site
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
8/67
George Town is a World Heritage Site
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
9/67
George Town is a World Heritage Site
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
10/67
There was an excellent network of
colonnaded pedestrian thoroughfares
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
11/67
Pedestrian colonnades
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
12/67
The 12-month project aims to
support the development of a fully
accessible public transport system
for Penang State, as a pilot for the
rest of Malaysia.
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
13/67
The project focuses on access
audits of public transport facilities,capacity building and awareness
raising activities.
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
14/67
In 2000, I felt that the main
access problems were poor or nopedestrian footways, and elderly
buses
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
15/67
George Town street, 2000
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
16/67
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
17/67
Some things are still the same in 2009
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
18/67
But a new bus operator is very
professional, using modern
vehicles, has well-trained staff,
and has a purpose built bus
terminal in Georgetown.
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
19/67
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
20/67
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
21/67
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
22/67
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
23/67
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
24/67
A number of accessible sections ofpedestrian footway have been built,
and one street converted to spacesharing
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
25/67
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
26/67
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
27/67
Existing accessible footways and crossings
Bus and ferryterminal
Existing accessible
Road crossings
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
28/67
The improvements are having an
effect
By December 2009, you could see
wheelchairs and baby strollers incentral George Town
Bus passengers have increasedfrom 1,100,000 to 1,800,000 per
four week period
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
29/67
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
30/67
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
31/67
But:- Accessible footways are not well
connected or continuous;
- Main bus and ferry terminals do notconnect to accessible footways;
- Construction is often not to correctstandards;
- Maintenance is sometimes poor;
- Enforcement of traffic and parkingregulations is almost wholly lacking.
Lack of contin it of accessible foot a at
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
32/67
Lack of continuity of accessible footway atentrance to Government building
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
33/67
Kerb ramp less than 70 cm wide
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
34/67
Poor maintenance
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
35/67
Kerb ramp blocked by incense burner
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
36/67
Pedestrian colonnades blocked
R bl k d b MPPP fl t
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
37/67
Ramp blocked by MPPP flowerpot
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
38/67
Footway and ramp blocked by parked vehicles
M t l f ll i bli d d t i
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
39/67
Motorcycle following a blind pedestrian
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
40/67
From December 2009, cruise ships
have been able to dock alongside
in George Town
There is no safe pedestrian link
from the pier to the Heritage Site
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
41/67
E it f i f i hi
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
42/67
Exit from pier for cruise ships
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
43/67
Improvements the UNDP study will
recommend include:
- Connectivity of footways;
- Connect bus and ferry terminal tofootway network;
- Pedestrian link to pier for cruise ships;
- Start work on demonstration bus
corridor.
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
44/67
World Heritage Site: priorities
for improvements to footways
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
45/67
Improvements to footways and road crossings
Existing accessible
1st priority
Road crossings
Bus and ferryterminal
Pier
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
46/67
The first priority improvements
(shown red) are estimated to cost
814,000 MR (about $230,000 US)
Work on improvements started in
December 2009
Installing kerb ramps (k b h i ht 12 i h )
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
47/67
Installing kerb ramps (kerb height 12 inches)
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
48/67
I now feel that providing accessible
infrastructure and vehicles is relatively
easy, but institutional problems are very
difficult
- When ramp kerbs are fitted,motorcycles ride along the footway;
- Police do not enforce traffic and parking
regulations;
- Buses do not stop close to the kerb.
Motorcycle behaviour
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
49/67
Motorcycle behaviour
Parking at bus stops
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
50/67
Parking at bus stops
Failing to stop close to the kerb
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
51/67
Failing to stop close to the kerb
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
52/67
Failing to stop close to the kerb
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
53/67
Failing to stop close to the kerb
Failing to stop close to the kerb
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
54/67
Failing to stop close to the kerb
Failing to stop close to the kerb
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
55/67
Failing to stop close to the kerb
Failing to stop close to the kerb
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
56/67
Failing to stop close to the kerb
The reasons bus drivers stop away
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
57/67
- Stops are often blocked by parkedvehicles;
- Stops have railings that preventpassengers boarding and alighting;
- Geometry of stops in lay-bys makes it
impossible for drivers to get close;
- Bus stop shelter roofs overhang kerb.
The reasons bus drivers stop awayfrom the kerb are:
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
58/67
I have suggested the use of bus
stop boarders (bus stop bulbs)
without railings to make it easy for
drivers to stop close to the kerb,
and to prevent vehicles driving
through the line of passengers
Accessible bus stops
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
59/67
Accessible bus stopsConsider using kerb extensions at bus stops
(bus boarders)
Bus boarder in Belfast
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
60/67
Bus boarder in Belfast
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
61/67
Because traffic does not stop at
pedestrian crossings, I have
suggested the use of median
pedestrian refuges at crossings
For lower priority pedestrian crossings
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
62/67
For lower priority pedestrian crossings,median pedestrian refuges offer benefits
Pedestrian refuge on 40mph (64kph) suburban road, Britain
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
63/67
Perhaps most important, I am
urging a long-term programme of
institutional change, involving
education and enforcement, to
support the excellent engineering
already in place
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
64/67
This includes changes within the
local authority, to encourage regular
inspection and maintenance of
footways, control of retail intrusiononto footways, and control of
unapproved construction onfootways and blocking colonnades.
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
65/67
Only time will tell whether theimprovements in accessibility can
be protected from road userbehaviour, lack of enforcement and
lack of inspection and maintenance.
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
66/67
This project has made me realise that,
as experts on accessibility, we are not
paying enough attention to the social
differences between countries, and theneed to design transport to be suitable
for local situations.
7/27/2019 2010 Mitchell Report
67/67
I hope this raises an issue for
discussion.