Upload
bennett-griffin
View
218
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2007/08/07 ARIA 1
Hidden Overconfidence and Advantageous Selection
Rachel J. HuangAssistant Professor, Finance Department
Ming Chuan University, Taipei, TaiwanYu-Jane Liu
Professor, Department of FinanceNational Cheng Chi University, Taipei, Taiwan
Larry Y. TzengProfessor, Department of Finance
National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
2007/08/07 ARIA 2
Agenda
1. Introduction2. Model3. Market Equilibrium4. Conclusion
2007/08/07 ARIA 3
1. Introduction
2007/08/07 ARIA 4
Motivation (1/3)
Relation between RISK TYPE and INSURANCE COVERAGE ADVERSE selection:
Theoretical prediction: positive Empirical evidence is mixed:
positive: health insurance, annuities negative: life insurance, long-term care insurance, rev
erse mortgages, medigap insurance
2007/08/07 ARIA 5
Motivation (2/3)
ADVANTAGEOUS selection (de Meza and Webb, 2001) explained by heterogeneous (hidden)
degree of risk aversion more risk-averse implies more insurance more risk-averse might imply more self-
protection, i.e. lower risk type
2007/08/07 ARIA 6
Motivation (3/3)
Empirical evidence on the sign of the negative relationship between degree of risk aversion and risk type is mixed negative: long-term care insurance positive: automobile and Medigap insura
nce There should exist other factors which
induce advantageous selection.
2007/08/07 ARIA 7
The Purpose
An alternative reason for advantageous selection: hidden heterogeneity in degrees of
overconfidence
2007/08/07 ARIA 8
Overconfidence Why?
Svenson (1981): Half the drivers in Taxes judged themselves to be among the safest 20%, and 88% believed themselves to be safer than the median driver.
What? Optimistic on risk probability
Langer (1975), Weinstein (1980) and Larwood and Whittaker (1977) show that CEOs tend to underestimate the failure of investment projects.
“Bad things cannot happen to me.” Optimistic on information quality
Daniel, Hirshleifer and Subrahmanyam (1998), Gervais and Odean (2001), and Gervais, Heaton, and Odean (2005)
2007/08/07 ARIA 9
Intuition
overconfidence might imply less insurance might also imply less self-protection,
i.e. high risk type
=> negative correlation between risk type and insurance coverage
2007/08/07 ARIA 10
Most Related Literature (1/2) Model setting: de Meza and Webb
(2001, Rand) Hidden information cause different types of
individuals. De Meza and Webb: degree of risk aversion Our: degree of overconfidence
The ex ante objective loss probabilities of different type of individuals are the same.
Different type of individuals would make different decisions on the investment for self-protection to reduce the loss probability.
One dimension approach
2007/08/07 ARIA 11
Most Related Literature (2/2) Heterogeneous risk perception
One dimension: Koufopoulos (2002, working) Oligopoly market Main findings: two types of separating equilibrium
advantageous selection One risk type in equilibrium but the less optimistic indivi
duals will purchase more coverage than the more optimistic individuals
Two dimension: Jeleva and Villeneuve (2004, ET)
Monopoly
2007/08/07 ARIA 12
Main findings
Separating, and partial pooling equilibria can exist.
Separating equilibria can predict adverse selection or advantageous selection.
2007/08/07 ARIA 13
2. Model
2007/08/07 ARIA 14
Assumptions and Notations (1/2)
Competitive insurance market Two types of customers: those who is overconfident (ty
pe o) and those who don't (type r) with proportion θ They have the same objective probability of loss:
π(F)=π or π(f)<π depending on investment in self-protection F∈{0,f}
Subjective belief of loss probability r type: π or π(f) o type: g(π ) or g(π(f) )
g’>0, g(π(F) ) < g(π ) g(π )< π(f)
Hidden information about types of customers and hidden action
2007/08/07 ARIA 15
Assumptions and Notations (2/2) The expected utility of the type i insured is
where W: initial wealth L: loss size p: premium rate Q: coverage
iiiiiiiiiii FQpWUFQpQLWUFEU )()](1[)()]([
2007/08/07 ARIA 16
Investment in Self-protection
r type will invest in self-protection iff
o type will invest in self-protection iff
Assume Δo <0
0)]()(][)([ fQpWUQpQLWUf rrrrrr
[ ( ( )) ( )][ ( ) ( )] 0o o o o o og f g U W L Q p Q U W p Q f
2007/08/07 ARIA 17
Game structure Stage 1
Insurers make binding offers of insurance contracts specifying coverage Q and premium rate p.
Stage 2 Individuals choose either a contract from the set of
contracts offered or no contract. If the same contract is offered by two insurers, individuals toss a fair coin.
Stage 3 Individuals choose whether or not to invest in self-
protection.
2007/08/07 ARIA 18
3. Market Equilibrium
2007/08/07 ARIA 19
Proposition 1: No pooling
2007/08/07 ARIA 20
Proposition 2 : first best separating equilibrium (advantageous selection)
2007/08/07 ARIA 21
Proposition 3 : second best separating equilibrium (advantageous selection)
2007/08/07 ARIA 22
Proposition 4 : partial pooling equilibrium (advantageous selection)
2007/08/07 ARIA 23
Proposition 5 : separating equilibrium with linear premium
2007/08/07 ARIA 24
Proposition 6 : no equilibrium
2007/08/07 ARIA 25
Adverse selection: if )()( gf
2007/08/07 ARIA 26
4. Conclusion
2007/08/07 ARIA 27
Contribution and findings Our paper provides a theoretical model of hidden
overconfidence to explain advantageous selection in the insurance market.
We demonstrate that: Separating (partial pooling) contracts in a form of
advantageous selection is equilibrium when the deviation in belief of the loss probability between the rational type of insured and the overconfident type of insured is relatively large.
neither the rational type of insured nor the overconfident type of insured expend any effort to reduce the loss probability, and both purchase insurance at the same premium rate, when the deviation in belief of the loss probability between the rational type of insured and the overconfident type of insured is relatively small.
Separating contracts in a form of adverse selection is equilibrium when the degree of overconfidence of the overconfident type insured is less severe.
2007/08/07 ARIA 28
Thank you for your attention!