28
2007/08/07 ARIA 1 Hidden Overconfidence and Advantageous Selection Rachel J. Huang Assistant Professor, Finance Department Ming Chuan University, Taipei, Taiwan Yu-Jane Liu Professor, Department of Finance National Cheng Chi University, Taipei, Taiwan Larry Y. Tzeng Professor, Department of Finance National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

2007/08/07ARIA1 Hidden Overconfidence and Advantageous Selection Rachel J. Huang Assistant Professor, Finance Department Ming Chuan University, Taipei,

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 2007/08/07ARIA1 Hidden Overconfidence and Advantageous Selection Rachel J. Huang Assistant Professor, Finance Department Ming Chuan University, Taipei,

2007/08/07 ARIA 1

Hidden Overconfidence and Advantageous Selection

Rachel J. HuangAssistant Professor, Finance Department

Ming Chuan University, Taipei, TaiwanYu-Jane Liu

Professor, Department of FinanceNational Cheng Chi University, Taipei, Taiwan

Larry Y. TzengProfessor, Department of Finance

National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

Page 2: 2007/08/07ARIA1 Hidden Overconfidence and Advantageous Selection Rachel J. Huang Assistant Professor, Finance Department Ming Chuan University, Taipei,

2007/08/07 ARIA 2

Agenda

1. Introduction2. Model3. Market Equilibrium4. Conclusion

Page 3: 2007/08/07ARIA1 Hidden Overconfidence and Advantageous Selection Rachel J. Huang Assistant Professor, Finance Department Ming Chuan University, Taipei,

2007/08/07 ARIA 3

1. Introduction

Page 4: 2007/08/07ARIA1 Hidden Overconfidence and Advantageous Selection Rachel J. Huang Assistant Professor, Finance Department Ming Chuan University, Taipei,

2007/08/07 ARIA 4

Motivation (1/3)

Relation between RISK TYPE and INSURANCE COVERAGE ADVERSE selection:

Theoretical prediction: positive Empirical evidence is mixed:

positive: health insurance, annuities negative: life insurance, long-term care insurance, rev

erse mortgages, medigap insurance

Page 5: 2007/08/07ARIA1 Hidden Overconfidence and Advantageous Selection Rachel J. Huang Assistant Professor, Finance Department Ming Chuan University, Taipei,

2007/08/07 ARIA 5

Motivation (2/3)

ADVANTAGEOUS selection (de Meza and Webb, 2001) explained by heterogeneous (hidden)

degree of risk aversion more risk-averse implies more insurance more risk-averse might imply more self-

protection, i.e. lower risk type

Page 6: 2007/08/07ARIA1 Hidden Overconfidence and Advantageous Selection Rachel J. Huang Assistant Professor, Finance Department Ming Chuan University, Taipei,

2007/08/07 ARIA 6

Motivation (3/3)

Empirical evidence on the sign of the negative relationship between degree of risk aversion and risk type is mixed negative: long-term care insurance positive: automobile and Medigap insura

nce There should exist other factors which

induce advantageous selection.

Page 7: 2007/08/07ARIA1 Hidden Overconfidence and Advantageous Selection Rachel J. Huang Assistant Professor, Finance Department Ming Chuan University, Taipei,

2007/08/07 ARIA 7

The Purpose

An alternative reason for advantageous selection: hidden heterogeneity in degrees of

overconfidence

Page 8: 2007/08/07ARIA1 Hidden Overconfidence and Advantageous Selection Rachel J. Huang Assistant Professor, Finance Department Ming Chuan University, Taipei,

2007/08/07 ARIA 8

Overconfidence Why?

Svenson (1981): Half the drivers in Taxes judged themselves to be among the safest 20%, and 88% believed themselves to be safer than the median driver.

What? Optimistic on risk probability

Langer (1975), Weinstein (1980) and Larwood and Whittaker (1977) show that CEOs tend to underestimate the failure of investment projects.

“Bad things cannot happen to me.” Optimistic on information quality

Daniel, Hirshleifer and Subrahmanyam (1998), Gervais and Odean (2001), and Gervais, Heaton, and Odean (2005)

Page 9: 2007/08/07ARIA1 Hidden Overconfidence and Advantageous Selection Rachel J. Huang Assistant Professor, Finance Department Ming Chuan University, Taipei,

2007/08/07 ARIA 9

Intuition

overconfidence might imply less insurance might also imply less self-protection,

i.e. high risk type

=> negative correlation between risk type and insurance coverage

Page 10: 2007/08/07ARIA1 Hidden Overconfidence and Advantageous Selection Rachel J. Huang Assistant Professor, Finance Department Ming Chuan University, Taipei,

2007/08/07 ARIA 10

Most Related Literature (1/2) Model setting: de Meza and Webb

(2001, Rand) Hidden information cause different types of

individuals. De Meza and Webb: degree of risk aversion Our: degree of overconfidence

The ex ante objective loss probabilities of different type of individuals are the same.

Different type of individuals would make different decisions on the investment for self-protection to reduce the loss probability.

One dimension approach

Page 11: 2007/08/07ARIA1 Hidden Overconfidence and Advantageous Selection Rachel J. Huang Assistant Professor, Finance Department Ming Chuan University, Taipei,

2007/08/07 ARIA 11

Most Related Literature (2/2) Heterogeneous risk perception

One dimension: Koufopoulos (2002, working) Oligopoly market Main findings: two types of separating equilibrium

advantageous selection One risk type in equilibrium but the less optimistic indivi

duals will purchase more coverage than the more optimistic individuals

Two dimension: Jeleva and Villeneuve (2004, ET)

Monopoly

Page 12: 2007/08/07ARIA1 Hidden Overconfidence and Advantageous Selection Rachel J. Huang Assistant Professor, Finance Department Ming Chuan University, Taipei,

2007/08/07 ARIA 12

Main findings

Separating, and partial pooling equilibria can exist.

Separating equilibria can predict adverse selection or advantageous selection.

Page 13: 2007/08/07ARIA1 Hidden Overconfidence and Advantageous Selection Rachel J. Huang Assistant Professor, Finance Department Ming Chuan University, Taipei,

2007/08/07 ARIA 13

2. Model

Page 14: 2007/08/07ARIA1 Hidden Overconfidence and Advantageous Selection Rachel J. Huang Assistant Professor, Finance Department Ming Chuan University, Taipei,

2007/08/07 ARIA 14

Assumptions and Notations (1/2)

Competitive insurance market Two types of customers: those who is overconfident (ty

pe o) and those who don't (type r) with proportion θ They have the same objective probability of loss:

π(F)=π or π(f)<π depending on investment in self-protection F∈{0,f}

Subjective belief of loss probability r type: π or π(f) o type: g(π ) or g(π(f) )

g’>0, g(π(F) ) < g(π ) g(π )< π(f)

Hidden information about types of customers and hidden action

Page 15: 2007/08/07ARIA1 Hidden Overconfidence and Advantageous Selection Rachel J. Huang Assistant Professor, Finance Department Ming Chuan University, Taipei,

2007/08/07 ARIA 15

Assumptions and Notations (2/2) The expected utility of the type i insured is

where W: initial wealth L: loss size p: premium rate Q: coverage

iiiiiiiiiii FQpWUFQpQLWUFEU )()](1[)()]([

Page 16: 2007/08/07ARIA1 Hidden Overconfidence and Advantageous Selection Rachel J. Huang Assistant Professor, Finance Department Ming Chuan University, Taipei,

2007/08/07 ARIA 16

Investment in Self-protection

r type will invest in self-protection iff

o type will invest in self-protection iff

Assume Δo <0

0)]()(][)([ fQpWUQpQLWUf rrrrrr

[ ( ( )) ( )][ ( ) ( )] 0o o o o o og f g U W L Q p Q U W p Q f

Page 17: 2007/08/07ARIA1 Hidden Overconfidence and Advantageous Selection Rachel J. Huang Assistant Professor, Finance Department Ming Chuan University, Taipei,

2007/08/07 ARIA 17

Game structure Stage 1

Insurers make binding offers of insurance contracts specifying coverage Q and premium rate p.

Stage 2 Individuals choose either a contract from the set of

contracts offered or no contract. If the same contract is offered by two insurers, individuals toss a fair coin.

Stage 3 Individuals choose whether or not to invest in self-

protection.

Page 18: 2007/08/07ARIA1 Hidden Overconfidence and Advantageous Selection Rachel J. Huang Assistant Professor, Finance Department Ming Chuan University, Taipei,

2007/08/07 ARIA 18

3. Market Equilibrium

Page 19: 2007/08/07ARIA1 Hidden Overconfidence and Advantageous Selection Rachel J. Huang Assistant Professor, Finance Department Ming Chuan University, Taipei,

2007/08/07 ARIA 19

Proposition 1: No pooling

Page 20: 2007/08/07ARIA1 Hidden Overconfidence and Advantageous Selection Rachel J. Huang Assistant Professor, Finance Department Ming Chuan University, Taipei,

2007/08/07 ARIA 20

Proposition 2 : first best separating equilibrium (advantageous selection)

Page 21: 2007/08/07ARIA1 Hidden Overconfidence and Advantageous Selection Rachel J. Huang Assistant Professor, Finance Department Ming Chuan University, Taipei,

2007/08/07 ARIA 21

Proposition 3 : second best separating equilibrium (advantageous selection)

Page 22: 2007/08/07ARIA1 Hidden Overconfidence and Advantageous Selection Rachel J. Huang Assistant Professor, Finance Department Ming Chuan University, Taipei,

2007/08/07 ARIA 22

Proposition 4 : partial pooling equilibrium (advantageous selection)

Page 23: 2007/08/07ARIA1 Hidden Overconfidence and Advantageous Selection Rachel J. Huang Assistant Professor, Finance Department Ming Chuan University, Taipei,

2007/08/07 ARIA 23

Proposition 5 : separating equilibrium with linear premium

Page 24: 2007/08/07ARIA1 Hidden Overconfidence and Advantageous Selection Rachel J. Huang Assistant Professor, Finance Department Ming Chuan University, Taipei,

2007/08/07 ARIA 24

Proposition 6 : no equilibrium

Page 25: 2007/08/07ARIA1 Hidden Overconfidence and Advantageous Selection Rachel J. Huang Assistant Professor, Finance Department Ming Chuan University, Taipei,

2007/08/07 ARIA 25

Adverse selection: if )()( gf

Page 26: 2007/08/07ARIA1 Hidden Overconfidence and Advantageous Selection Rachel J. Huang Assistant Professor, Finance Department Ming Chuan University, Taipei,

2007/08/07 ARIA 26

4. Conclusion

Page 27: 2007/08/07ARIA1 Hidden Overconfidence and Advantageous Selection Rachel J. Huang Assistant Professor, Finance Department Ming Chuan University, Taipei,

2007/08/07 ARIA 27

Contribution and findings Our paper provides a theoretical model of hidden

overconfidence to explain advantageous selection in the insurance market.

We demonstrate that: Separating (partial pooling) contracts in a form of

advantageous selection is equilibrium when the deviation in belief of the loss probability between the rational type of insured and the overconfident type of insured is relatively large.

neither the rational type of insured nor the overconfident type of insured expend any effort to reduce the loss probability, and both purchase insurance at the same premium rate, when the deviation in belief of the loss probability between the rational type of insured and the overconfident type of insured is relatively small.

Separating contracts in a form of adverse selection is equilibrium when the degree of overconfidence of the overconfident type insured is less severe.

Page 28: 2007/08/07ARIA1 Hidden Overconfidence and Advantageous Selection Rachel J. Huang Assistant Professor, Finance Department Ming Chuan University, Taipei,

2007/08/07 ARIA 28

Thank you for your attention!