Upload
norfolking
View
231
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
1/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy1 June 2007
Prepared for:
Wollongong City Council
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
2/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
DISTRIBUTION
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
1 June 2007
Copies Recipient Copies Recipient3 Ms Lisa Miller
Project ManagerWollongong Council41 Burrelli Street
Wollongong 2500
This document was prepared for the sole use of Wollongong City Council and the regulatory agencies that are directly involved in
this project, the only intended beneficiaries of our work. No other party should rely on the information contained herein without theprior written consent of HLA-Envirosciences Pty Limited and Wollongong City Council.
By
HLA-Envirosciences Pty Limited
ABN: 34 060 204 702Level 5, 828 Pacific Highway Gordon NSW 2072
PO Box 726 Pymble NSW 2073
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
3/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
CONTENTS
GLOSSARY OF TERMS..............................................................................................................IV1 BACKGROUND............................................................................................................. 1
1.1 Introduction..................................................................................................... 11.2 Commission of Inquiry.................................................................................... 11.3 Illawarra Escarpment Strategic Management Plan........................................ 2
1.3.1 Land Classification.......................................................................... 31.3.2 Areas of Special Interest................................................................. 4
1.4 Land Use Review Strategy............................................................................. 41.5 Parallel Studies............................................................................................... 61.6 Existing Planning Framework......................................................................... 61.7 How to Use this Document ............................................................................. 6
2 OVERALL APPROACH................................................................................................ 72.1 Sustainable Environment................................................................................ 72.2 Spatial Analysis .............................................................................................. 7
3 APPROACH TO LAND USE REVIEW.......................................................................... 93.1 Overview......................................................................................................... 93.2 Land Use Review ......................................................................................... 11
3.2.1 Approach....................................................................................... 113.3 Precincts....................................................................................................... 13
3.3.1 Precinct Definition ......................................................................... 133.3.2 Precincts........................................................................................ 143.3.3 Precinct 1: Marshall Mount............................................................ 173.3.4 Precinct 2: West Dapto Bowl......................................................... 193.3.5 Precinct 3: The Heights................................................................. 233.3.6 Precinct 4: Mt Kembla................................................................... 263.3.7 Precinct 5: Mt Keira....................................................................... 283.3.8 Precinct 6: Balgownie Valley......................................................... 313.3.9 Precinct 7: Coastal Ridges............................................................ 323.3.10 Precinct 8: Cliff Coast.................................................................... 35
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
4/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
4.4.1 Principles....................................................................................... 434.4.2 Issues............................................................................................ 44
4.5 Landscape .................................................................................................... 444.5.1 Principles....................................................................................... 444.5.2 Issues............................................................................................ 44
4.6 Rural Landscape .......................................................................................... 444.6.1 Principles....................................................................................... 444.6.2 Issues............................................................................................ 45
4.7 Water Resource............................................................................................ 454.7.1 Principles....................................................................................... 454.7.2 Issues............................................................................................ 45
5 STATUTORY CONTEXT............................................................................................. 465.1 Review of Wollongong DRAFT WLEP 2007 ................................................ 465.2 Land Use Zones ........................................................................................... 46
5.2.1 Wollongong DRAFT WLEP 2007.................................................. 465.2.2 West Dapto LEP 2006................................................................... 475.2.3 Commentary.................................................................................. 48
5.3 Landscape Support for Core/ Escarpment Interface.................................... 495.3.1 Biophysical Support for Core - Areas of Special Interest.............. 50
6 REVIEW OF DRAFT WOLLONGONG DRAFT WLEP 2007 PLANNINGINSTRUMENT.............................................................................................................. 526.1 LEP Text....................................................................................................... 526.2 Part 1 - Preliminary....................................................................................... 526.3 Part 2 Permitted or Prohibited Development............................................. 52
6.3.1 Land Use Zones............................................................................ 526.3.2 Zone Objectives ............................................................................ 536.3.3 Additional Permitted/ Prohibited Uses .......................................... 546.3.4
Subdivision Consent Requirements........................................... 54
6.4 Part 3 Exempt and Complying Development ............................................... 55
6.4.1 Exempt Development.................................................................... 556.4.2 Complying Development ............................................................... 55
6.5 Part 4 Principal Development Standards ..................................................... 566 5 1 L t Si 56
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
5/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
8 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL FRAMEWORK ............................................................. 668.1 Introduction................................................................................................... 668.2 Escarpment Modification Threats................................................................. 668.3 Characterisation of Land .............................................................................. 68
8.3.1 Environmental Envelope............................................................... 698.4 Proposed Amendments to DCP No 49......................................................... 70
9 CONCLUSION............................................................................................................. 71
TABLESTable 1: Attribute Values............................................................................................................. 41Table 2: Comparison of Zoning...................................................................................................47FIGURESFigure 1: Study Area
Figure 2: Methodology
Figure 3: Precincts
Figure 4: Areas of Special Interest
Figure 5: Landscape for Core Escarpment Interface Site Analysis - Index (Appendix A)
APPENDICESAppendix A : Review of Land Use Zones Draft WLEP 2007
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
6/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
APZ Asset Protection Zone
COI Commission of Inquiry
DECC Department of Environment and ClimateChange
DOE Development Opportunity Envelope
DoP Department of Planning
ECC Endangered Ecological Community
FTP Fair Trading Policy
GIS Geographical Information System
IESMP Illawarra Escarpment Strategic ManagementPlan
IEWP Illawarra Escarpment Working PartyIREP Illawarra Regional Environmental Plan
LEP Local Environmental Plan
DRAFT WLEP 2007 Draft Wollongong DRAFT WLEP 2007
LGA Local Government Area
PCT Project Coordination Team
RRP Rural Residential Policy
VAC Visual Absorption Capacity
WCC Wollongong City Council
WDLEP Draft Wollongong LEP 2006 West Dapto
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
7/104
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
8/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
1.3 Illawarra Escarpment Strategic Management Plan
The Illawarra Escarpment Strategic Management Plan (IESMP) was prepared in 2005 to
address the long term planning and sustainable management of the escarpment.
Prepared by WCC with input from the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (now
Department of Environment and Climate Change (DECC)), Department of Infrastructure
Planning and Natural Resources (now Department of Planning (DoP)), the Illawarra Escarpment
Community Reference Group, local Aboriginal representatives, CSIRO, University of
Wollongong and a number of heritage consultants, the primary objective of the plan was to:
identify important environmentally significant areas of the escarpment andfoothills;
assess the existing land use zones within the escarpment and identifychanges to the zoning regime to align conservation requirements and land
use zones;
provide a framework for consistency in applying WCC land use planning
policies to current and future public and private land use;
identify voluntary land management options for all land tenures consistentwith the conservation values;
outline potential implementation strategies to facilitate partnerships betweenpublic and private land holdings with respect to voluntary management
options; and
discuss possible conservation incentives to encourage conservationoutcomes.
The IESMP defined a study area boundary which is a composite of a number of features as
follows.
In the north the boundary is the line used by the Illawarra Escarpment Working
Party (IEWP). The western boundary adopted the escarpment watershed line
determined by DEC, with a 150 m buffer. The southern study area boundary is the
Local Government Area (LGA) boundary. To the east, the boundary is a
combination of the IEWP line and the 50 m RL (contiguous land at 50 m elevation
or higher above sea level but excluding land that is zoned residential (2 zoning),
commercial (3 zoning) or industrial (4a and 4b zoning). Whichever line is the
furthest east was adopted.
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
9/104
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
10/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
lands are shown in Figure 4.1 of the IESMP and referred to in this report as the Areas of Special
Interest (see Section 1.3.2 and 5.4).
The Escarpment Interface areas given their proximity to existing urban areas also require
careful attention. The IESMP considered that these areas provided an important buffer to the
integrity of lands of higher ecological value and therefore needed to be planned to ensure that
the buffer status is maintained and enhanced, while at the same time provide for, where
appropriate, residential development.
1.3.2 Areas of Special Interest
The Biophysical Support for Core areas identified in Figure 4.1 of the IESMP are located in the
southern extent of the Wollongong LGA. Of the seven sites identified for further consideration,
four are located in the sensitive Marshall Mount area off North Marshall Mount Road, two are
former mine sites at Avondale and Huntley and land at Dombarton sits at high elevation to the
north east of Wongawilli.
The IESMP considered that limited development may be possible on these lands having regardto the environmental sensitivity of the receiving environment and provided there were
mechanisms in place to drive rehabilitation and restoration of the land and its surrounds. The
Areas of Special Interest are addressed separately in the Section 5.4 of this report.
1.4 Land Use Review Strategy
The COI and IESMP identified the need to carry out a Land Use Review Strategy
(Masterplanning for developable land) to replace the RRP and FTP. It envisaged that the LandUse Review Strategy would provide clear development and conservation parameters for the
proposed environmental conservation and management zones which would apply to the
Escarpment area following a comprehensive review of LEP 1990.
HLA was commissioned by WCC in May 2006 to undertake the Land Use Review Strategy.
Essentially the Strategy provides a framework to guide any future development or
redevelopment within the Escarpment Area (Study Area) as defined by the IESMP and shown in
Figure 1. It identifies potential development areas where environmentally appropriateresidential development may occur, as well as areas where the existing planning controls will
need to be strengthened, to allow the protection or enhancement of conservation values. The
Strategy has addressed national, regional and local planning guidance and provided input to the
review of detailed land use policies currently being undertaken by WCC as discussed in 1.6
below.
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
11/104
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
12/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
Asset Protection Zones (APZ) are contained within already cleared areasand that no native vegetation be removed for development of an APZ;
no overt increase in the density of development so as to retain ruralatmosphere (for instance dwellings need to be hidden or clustered);
development needs to contribute to the improved management of adjoininghigh conservation value lands through for example, ecological restoration
where possible;
environmental controls, such as effluent management, can be incorporatedand contained within the site;
there are sufficient water resources for domestic and fire fighting purposes;
provision of vegetated buffers to adjoining high conservation value land;
identification of appropriate sites, to be managed under an agreedenvironmental management plan; and
identification of appropriate sites to be managed under a voluntaryconservation agreement. (IESMP).
1.5 Parallel Studies
The extensive volume of data commissioned by WCC, DoP and DECC since the COI informed
the Strategy. WCC also commissioned dsb Landscape Architects and Mayne Wilson and
Associates Heritage Consultants in mid 2006 to prepare a visual analysis and heritageassessment to inform the strategy. The reports Visual Quality Analysis of Escarpment Scenic
Values(dsb Landscape Architects 2006) and Illawarra Escarpment Heritage Assessment(
Mayne Wilson and Associates 2007) have been referenced throughout preparation of the
Strategy. In addition HLA and its subconsultants prepared a number of reports to supplement
the information available addressing built form, stormwater, water, traffic and geotechnical
matters, riparian corridors and bushfire.
1.6 Existing Planning FrameworkIn tandem with the preparation of the Land Use Review Strategy, WCC has been undertaking a
comprehensive review of LEP 1990, Wollongong DRAFT WLEP 2007(DRAFT WDRAFT WLEP
2007), and finalising studies to enable the West Dapto LEP 2006 (WDLEP 2006) to be placed
on public exhibition. Draft WLEP 2007applies to the majority of land within the Study Area, and
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
13/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
2 OVERALL APPROACH
2.1 Sustainable Environment
The principles of sustainability as defined by the Town and Country Planning Association UK in
its report Planning for a Sustainable Environment, have underpinned the approach taken by
HLA in developing this Land Use Review Strategy. The report states that:
Sustainable development is development that enhances the natural and built
environmental in ways that are compatible with:
The requirement to conserve the stock of natural assets, wherever possible,
offsetting any avoidable reduction by a compensating increase so that the
total itself is left undiminished.
The need to avoid damaging the vegetative capacity of the worlds
ecosystems.
The lack of attention to the principles of sustainability has resulted in development in a number
of areas on the Escarpment which detracts from, and in some instances diminishes, the value of
this important environment. While the COI sought to address the appropriateness of
development in certain areas, and the IESMP identified areas under threat from development
(Core and Biophysical Support for Core areas), there is still a perception in the wider community
that there is potential for residential or other development in most areas on the Escarpment,
regardless of zoning. The Land Use Review Strategy has sought to redress this, by identifying
areas with potential development opportunity and recommending appropriate zoning across the
Escarpment area with reference to dwelling entitlements.
In relation to the built environment, HLA considers that the development and use of the built
environment should respect and be in harmony with the natural environment, and the
relationship between the two should be designed to be one of balance and mutual
enhancement.
2.2 Spatial AnalysisTo fully understand what is happening in the area identified for further study, HLA adopted a
spatial approach to land use planning. Using the wealth of background information
encapsulated in Councils Geographical Information System (GIS), a holistic review of all land in
the study area was carried out. The study team, comprising environmental planners, engineers,
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
14/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
to environmental information derived from studies commissioned as a result of the COI and
contained in the GIS, enabled the study team to provide a spatial understanding of what landwould likely be severely constrained or unconstrained, by reference to various environmental
criteria.
These criteria included:
vegetation;
fauna habitat;
areas of conservation significance or endangered ecological communities(ECC);
landslip risk high, medium, low;
contours;
slope analysis;
riparian corridors;
heritage (Indigenous and Non - Indigenous);
bushfire; and
flood data.
The data used to inform the constraints analysis was derived from a number of sources
including Councils GIS:
vegetation mapping; fauna habitat surrogates;
area of conservation significance or ECC;
land use zoning (existing and proposed);
landslip risk;
contours;
slope analysis;
riparian corridors;
heritage (Indigenous and Non - Indigenous);
bushfire (APZ definition);
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
15/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
3 APPROACH TO LAND USE REVIEW
3.1 Overview
Extensive fieldwork, workshops with Statutory Authorities (DoP and DECC), internal workshops
within WCC, close examination of the WCC GIS and various sub consultant studies addressing
built form, water management, riparian corridor, visual, heritage and bushfire matters, all
informed the development of the Strategy. Review of LEP 1990, the Draft WDLEP 2006 and
Draft WLEP 2007 illustrated the intricate nature of land use planning in the Escarpment Area.
Key threatening processes and the complex ecological and visual structure of the area, all
influenced recommendations for amendments to the current planning framework as discussed
later (see Sections 6 and 7).
The Methodology and approach to development of the Strategy is discussed in the
accompanying explanatory document and illustrated in Figure 2.
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
16/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
Figure 2 Approach
VISUAL ANALYSIS
VISUAL
ASSESSMENT
Recommended Amendments to
Draft WLEP 2007 and Draft
WDLEP 2006
Workshop 1
Issues Identification
Familiarisation with Area
Site Visits Fly Over
Workshop 2
Precinct Definition
PRECINCT
DEFINITION
Review of Zonings in Study Area
Landscape Support for Core/Escarpment
Interface areas
Workshop 3
Visual Quality Analysis
Land Use Review
Review of Development
Standards
Identification of Potential
Development Areas
INPUT FROM
IESMP
INTERFACE AREAS
MINE SITES
RURAL POCKETS
Definition of EnvironmentalEnvelope
Carrying Capacity of Land
(Constraints Analysis)
Layering of Environmental Values
Prepare Issues BasedControls for Land above
50m on Escarpment
Site Specific Controls
Areas of Special Interest
Vegetation
Key Element
Councillor Briefing
Recommended
Amendments
Draft WLEP 2006
Draft WLEP 2007
Internal
Mapping
Workshops
WCC
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
17/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
3.2 Land Use Review
3.2.1 Approach
The approach taken throughout the Land Use Review was to address issues at a strategic level
focusing on the conservation of biodiversity while allowing for site sensitive development that
responds to individual parts of the Escarpment. It is acknowledged that large areas of the
Escarpment by virtue of proximity to lands zoned National Park will be afforded a higher level of
conservation.
The visual, ecological, geophysical and heritage characteristics of the land have been well
documented. HLA has taken this information and determined the degree of planning flexibility
needed to enable a range of development types which respond to these attributes. The Team
has also addressed the longer term development window, acknowledging there will be changed
environmental and other expectations as to the form and extent of development that will be
permissible over time. This is particularly relevant in the southern parts of the Study Area within
the WD LEP 2006 boundary, earmarked for development as part of Stage 4 of the West Dapto
Release area.
As discussed earlier, preparation of a Land Use Review Strategy was one of the key
recommendations of the IESMP. As a consequence it is fundamental that the Land Use Review
Strategy draws on the findings and key outcomes of the IESMP, provides a clear path forward
and addresses key issues arising from the IESMP and indeed the COI. This approach was
endorsed by DoP at an early workshop in the Strategy preparation process.
The IESMP determined there may be some development potential on land classified asLandscape Support for Core, Escarpment Interface and to a limited extent Biophysical Support
for Core. In order to understand the issues likely to determine whether development may occur
in these areas, HLA investigated the potential to develop lands zoned (1) Non Urban, 4(c)
Extractive Industry, 7(b) Environmental Protection Conservation, 7(c) Environmental Protection
Residential, 7 (c1) Environmental Protection Rural Residential and 7(d) Environmental
Protection Port Hacking River, from south to north. Later HLA widened the investigation to
consider all lands zoned 1 Non Urban, 7(b) and 7(c) regardless of landscape classification
within the Escarpment.
Land which was considered to be visually prominent, encumbered by various environmental
constraints or which did not provide a logical fit with adjoining zoning, were selected for more
rigorous review. It is noted that while attention was directed to specific sites, review was carried
out in a strategic manner covering a broad area to form an understanding of the environmental
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
18/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
Instability
- suspected landslip areas; and
- recorded areas of landslip (geotechnical series maps).
Bushfire hazard
- APZ Priority Areas.
Riparian corridors
- riparian corridors for category 1-3 Creeks and appropriate buffers.
Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Heritage.
Buildings and services
- existing infrastructure.
Ridgelines
- significant from an Indigenous Heritage and visual perspective.
Visual Amenity
- visual quality analysis.
Slope.
The key principles which informed development of the strategy are discussed in Section4.
Where relevant, reference was made to the Locality and Site Specific Submissions section of
the COI report to provide an understanding of the Commissions view on development inspecific areas.
The Review indicated that there are a number of sites which could facilitate a different form of
development (following a potential rezoning) given the environmental characteristics of the land.
These sites would require more rigorous environmental analysis should a proposal be submitted
to develop the land in the future.
The capability and limitations of the Escarpment were examined to determine to what extent itcould sustain new development and how future activities must be managed (i.e. permitted,
modified) drawing on the extensive environmental, visual and engineering and built form
experience of the study team, to achieve the intended outcomes.
The analysis provided the necessary input to the development of an appropriate set of
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
19/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
development area does not extend beyond the top third of the screening
foreground forest canopy, there will be negligible adverse impact on the
visual character.
Large clearings in the Escarpment forest are least capable of acceptingdevelopmentwithout creating a significant change in visual character, as the
view of the gap in the forest canopy across the large clearing varies
depending on the length of the clearing up the slope. As the length of the
clearing up the slope increases the view of the Escarpment clearing
exponentially changes.
3.3 Precincts
3.3.1 Precinct Definition
Early in the Land Use Review process, HLA and its visual analysis consultant dsb Landscape
Architects, carried out extensive site surveys of the land above the 50m contour and all key
visual vantage points and flew the length of the Escarpment area.
Specifically the team looked at:
The development pattern and how it fits within the landscape.
Riparian corridors and other significant topographic elements.
Areas where environmentally appropriate development could occur withoutcomprising suitability principals and land capability controls in the IESMP.
Priority areas form the maintenance, enhancements and/or restoration of thelandscape character.
HLA and dsb Landscape Architects held internal workshops to more fully understand what were
the key factors affecting development within the Study Area. Although there may be significant
non-visual constraints determining the nature of development in key areas, criticism of
development at the interface and within Core Escarpment areas is often levelled by the
community, where development is visually prominent or out of character with its surrounds.
HLA and dsb were tasked with determining which factors led to this often emotive response.
It became clear that vegetation was the key variable and that in many instances it was not the
vegetation in the Core area which was significant but that in the foreground. This clearly
validates Councils approach of no clearing of native vegetation but draws attention to
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
20/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
From south to north ten precincts were determined based on characteristics that separate each
precinct from adjacent precincts and having regard to local conditions as a component of the
whole Escarpment.
The Precincts illustrated in Figure 3 include,
Marshall Mount
West Dapto Bowl
The Heights
Mt Kembla
Mt Keira
Balgownie Valley
Coastal Ridges
Cliff Coast
Stanwell, and Maddens Plains.
3.3.2 Precincts
Each of the ten precincts within the Study area has its own distinct characteristics and has clear
environmental variables which demarcate the precinct. The descriptions of the precincts below
are an abridged version of those in the Visual Quality Analysis of Escarpment Scenic Values
(dsb 2006) in Appendix B of the Explanatory Document.
Each precinct is discussed in terms of its:
Visual Absorption Capacity (VAC) which is an estimation of the capacity of aparticular area to absorb development without creating a significant change
in visual character or a reduction in the scenic quality of an area. The
capacity to visually absorb development is primarily dependant on landform,
vegetation and existing development; and Development Opportunity Envelope (DOE) which identifies the limits of
development form that may enable the satisfaction of the objective - net gain
in the scenic and aesthetic valuesobjective.
As discussed earlier in Section 3 2 1 small clearings in the escarpment forest are most capable
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
21/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
Key viewpoints which offer views of development within the precinct (eitherof a local or regional nature).
Inclusion of Precinct Character Statements within the DCP will provide a guide to potential
developers when addressing visual quality issues as part of the overall environmental
assessment to accompany any DA, for development in the Study Area (see Section8.4).
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
22/104
31052007www
.hla
-env
iro
.com
.au
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
23/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
A brief description of each precinct is provided below.
3.3.3 Precinct 1: Marshall Mount
The Marshall Mount precinct includes the western return of the Escarpment towards the WCC
LGA Boundary near Macquarie Pass. The landscape includes steep sided valleys below the
Escarpment with a rural/rural residential patchwork mosaic of cleared valley floors and remnant
vegetation on side slopes and ridgelines. The precinct valleys are Marshall Mount/Calderwood,
North Marshall Mount and Avondale. Elevated ridges, running eastwards from the Escarpment,dominate the landform. The precinct edge is the end of the ridges. The Cedars rural residential
development is located on the end of the Avondale ridgeline overlooking the adjacent precinct
to the north- the West Dapto Bowl.
The elevated clearings on the 220m contour are highly visible from a distance. The steep slope
angle and visible grass surface limits identification of DOE within these cleared areas. North
Marshall Mount valley is a contained landscape with a high VAC and DOE potential. Ridgelines
adjacent to Huntley Colliery provide landform screening and a high VAC and DOE potential.
Bong Bong pass mine stockpile site provides the opportunity for siting development at the rear
of landform benches and installation of foreground screening forest on bench fronts. This is a
highly visible site capable of modification for a high VAC and DOE potential.
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
24/104
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
25/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
Aerial view south across Bong Bong Pass and Avondale ridgeline to Albion Park.
View west from F6 Freeway at Penrose to Cedars on end of Avondale ridgeline.
Remnant vegetation of valley foreground and ridgetops extends illusion of escarpment vegetationto valley floor.
Grass clearing on 220m contour evident in escarpment.
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
26/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
character is one of existing vegetation interrupted with cleared vegetation/development
mosaics. The interruptions in the Escarpment include, the revegetated mine dump adjacent to
the end of Bong Bong Road, isolated individual rural residential development on ridgetops and
prominent locations, Wongawilli Mine, and Dombarton area rural residential areas adjacent to
Smiths Lane/ Sheaffes Road, Paynes Road and Redalls Road.
Bong Bong Pass to WongawilliClearings extending up to the escarpment are highly visible
from a distance. The steep slope angle and visible grass surface limits identification of DOE.
WongawilliClearings within the escarpment associated with colliery development are indistinct
in the landscape with a high VAC and DOE potential.
Wongawilli through Dombarton to Redalls RoadClearings within the escarpment associated
with rural residential development have long slope lengths on less steep slopes and are highly
visible from a distance. The slope angle and visible grass surface limits identification of DOE.
Clearings within the escarpment associated with rural residential development with foreground
screening forest are less highly visible from a distance. Potential exists following revegetation
works for a high VAC and DOE potential.
Redalls Road to Farmborough HeightsClearings within the landscape associated with urban
infrastructure development are well screened by siting behind landform or landscape screening.
Clearings above the urban infrastructure development have long slope lengths on less steep
slopes and are highly visible from a distance. The slope angle and visible grass surface limits
identification of DOE.
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
27/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
Bong Bong Pass to Wongawilli.
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
28/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
Dombarton to Precinct edge with The Heights.
Mt Kembla to Horsley across Dombarton and Mullet Creek valley.
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
29/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
View west to escarpment from Bong Bong Road.
View of rural residential development north of Wongawilli .
View across Kembla Grange from F6 Freeway to Mt Kembla and Farmborough Heights r idgeline.
View across valley and Horsley to Dapto and Lake Illawarra.
3 3 5 Precinct 3: The Heights
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
30/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
Aerial view over precinct.
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
31/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
Cordeaux Heights Ridgeline.
View north from Farmborough Heights to Mt Nebo and Mt Keira.
View northwest from Farmborough Heights to Mt Kembla.
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
32/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
Detail of Cobblers Hill viewed from F6 Freeway at Five Islands Road.
View west from Five Islands Road Cringila.
View west from Five Islands Road to Mt Nebo and escarpment beyond. The Heights precinct is tothe south of Mt Nebo.
3.3.6 Precinct 4: Mt Kembla
This precinct includes the elevated, closed and contained landform of the suburbs of Mt Kembla
and Kembla Heights. The escarpment is behind and Cordeaux Heights is to the east. The
elevated vegetated landforms of Mt Kembla and Mt Keira dominate to the north and south.
Mt Kembla precinct is a contained landscape with a high VAC and DOE potential.
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
33/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
Aerial view of escarpment with Mt Kembla to left and Mt Nebo to right and escarpment beyond.
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
34/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
Composite view of precinct looking east from above the escarpment. Mt Nebo and Kemira Collieryto left.
Composite view of Mt Kembla village from above the escarpment.
3.3.7 Precinct 5: Mt Keira
Mt Keira covers the elevated footslopes of Mt Keira extending from the OBriens Road ridgeline,
Figtree, in the south, through the Mt Keira Road ridgeline, West Wollongong, to the
Keiraville/University of Wollongong ridgeline in the north. The landform is of a concave
landscape elevated above the surrounding Wollongong urban areas to the north and south, and
Wollongong City to the east The precinct is urban in character with elevated vegetated
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
35/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
36/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
Aerial view of northern portion of precinct. Wollongong University and Mt Keira below Mt Keira.
Aerial view of precinct from above the escarpment. View between Mt Keira and Mt Nebo withFigtree beyond.
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
37/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
View west from Five Islands Road to Mt Nebo and escarpment beyond. The Mt Keira precinct is tothe north of Mt Nebo.
3.3.8 Precinct 6: Balgownie Valley
This Balgownie Valley precinct is a contained concave distinct valley extending further backfrom the coastal plain to the Escarpment between the prominent landforms of Mt Keira and
Brokers Nose. The precinct edges are the Keiraville/University of Wollongong ridgeline to the
south and the vegetated ridgeline and Towradgi Creek below Brokers Nose in the north. The
precinct is urban in character with elevated vegetated landforms and Escarpment behind. A
remnant vegetation/urban development mosaic dominates the landscape character on the
urban edge. The urban edge contains a mix of development types including very large
block/large house rural residential, older standard urban development, and recent urban
development of large block/very large house. This mix of development type contributes to avariable quality landscape and visual quality escarpment/development edge.
Clearings within the escarpment associated with the Corrimal colliery development are indistinct
in the landscape with a high VAC and DOE potential.
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
38/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
Aerial view of Balgownie Valley Precinct with Mt Keira to the south.
Aerial view of Balgownie Valley from above the escarpment.
View to escarpment from within Balgownie.
3.3.9 Precinct 7: Coastal Ridges
The Coastal Ridges precinct extends from Brokers Nose in the south to the vegetated ridgeline
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
39/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
highly visible from a distance. Potential exists following revegetation works for a high VAC and
DOE potential.
Clearings within the escarpment associated with rural residential development on escarpment
benches on Bulli Pass when viewed from below are indistinct in the landscape with a high VAC
and DOE potential.
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
40/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
Aerial view Russell Vale to Bulli.
Aerial view Bulli to Thirroul.
Aerial view from above the escarpment, Thirroul to Bull i.
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
41/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
Aerial view from above the escarpment, Russell Vale to Corrimal.
Aerial view from above the escarpment, Corrimal to Tarrawanna.
3.3.10 Precinct 8: Cliff Coast
This precinct extends from the vegetated elevated ridgeline adjacent to Mountain Road Thirroul,
in the south, to the end of the Escarpment at the School of Arts at Clifton in the north. The
landscape form consists of Escarpment / vegetated Escarpment footslopes / urban development
edge above beaches and cliffs. The precinct is tightly located between the Escarpment and the
ocean, with a landscape treed canopy extending down to a tight urban form located below the
railway line and above the beaches and cliffs. A linear strip of dwellings extends along a natural
bench within the foothills landform from Austinmer to Wombarra along Buttenshaw Drive and
Morrison Avenue. Extensive vegetation provides few opportunities to view this developmentfrom Lawrence Hargrave Drive and beaches. There are however a number of natural benches
further up into the Escarpment above Buttenshaw/Morrison Avenue in the Coledale/ Wombarra
area which owing to breaks in vegetation in gullies and on ridges, afford extensive views of the
coast and if inappropriately developed may be viewed from some distance.
Ill E t L d U R i St t
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
42/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
Aerial view of Austinmer to Wombarra.
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
43/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
44/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
vegetation on prominent headlands adjacent to Stanwell Park, contrasting with eucalypt forest
behind the beaches.
Development within the Stanwell precinct should be complimentary with the existing landscape /
urban character.
Aerial view Seacliff Bridge to Stanwell Park.
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
45/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
View south from Bald Hill over Stanwell Park and Coalcliff.
View north from Seacliff Bridge to Coalcli ff and Bald Hill.
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
46/104
a a a sca p e t a d Use e e St ategy
Aerial view of Maddens Plains looking south over escarpment to ocean.
3.3.13 Attribute Values
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
47/104
p gy
dsb (2007) evaluated the landform, vegetation and the built environment to determine the value
which could be allocated to each attribute by precinct. Table 1 illustrates the attribute values
and clearly shows that the majority of precincts have medium to high landform scarcity,indicating a unique landform and are rated as being aesthetically important. The Mount Keira
precinct is considered to provide the best fit between built form elements and the environment.
It is noted that the Heights precinct faired poorly against all variables.
Table 1: Attribute Values
Precinct Landform Scarcity1 VegetationSignificance2
Built EnvironmentFeatures3
Marshall Mount H H M-H
West Dapto Bowl M-H H L - M
The Heights L L L
Mt Kembla M-H H M-H
Mt Keira H H H
Balgownie H H M-LCoastal Ridges M H M
Cliff Coast H H M-H
Stanwell H H M-H
Maddens Plains H H M-L
Note1 H-Unique landform
M- repetitive landform
L common landform2
H- aesthetically important3
H modification blends with landscape character
M-H modification sympathetic with landscape character
L- urban infrastructure detracts from built landscape
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
48/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
49/104
4.3 Biodiversity
4.3.1 Principle
No clearing of native vegetation in Core and Biophysical Support for Coreareas as set out in the IESMP.
Protect, maintain and enhance flora and fauna species and habitats ofimportance.
Maintenance and enhancement of the biodiversity resources.
Conservation of the natural character and biodiversity of the widerenvironment to complement the high level of protection afforded to area
within National Parks and Reserves.
Proximity to EEC and limitation of potential for direct impact on EEC.
Restoration and expansion of depleted and vulnerable biodiversityresources, particularly where habitats are currently fragmented refer to
Bioregional Assessment Study (National Parks and Wildlife Service 2002).
Consideration of the web of wildlife habitat such as riparian corridors, greenwedges.
Ensuring the conservation of protected species in the location ofdevelopment.
Preserving the strategic landscape and wildlife links between the rural areasand urban spaces (ie Marshall Mount/Calderwood Valley).
4.3.2 Issues
Issues addressed included: the potential to create new habitats/identification of areas for habitat
restoration, maintenance of the diversity of habitats, Threatened Species, EEC, buffer areas to
areas of high conservation significance (Core areas), interface areas, no clearing of native
vegetation in Core and Biophysical Support for Core areas (as set out in the IESMP), creation of
green wedges/corridors, implementation mechanisms to further the conservation and
enhancement of native vegetation on Biophysical Support for Core land in the Areas of Special
Interest.
4.4 Built Environment
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
50/104
Identification of an environmental envelope on Biophysical Support for Coreland in Areas of Special Interest.
Location of development with full consideration of its visual context within aprecinct.
4.4.2 Issues
Issues addressed included the need to develop clear policies and guidance that establish the
key principles and criteria for new development. Study Team review of DCP No. 49: Residential
Developmentwith a focus on encouraging good and innovative design and layout which
embraces local character and distinctiveness and the significant local and wider ecological
environment within which a development will sit (See Section 8). Review of landowner
entitlements, existing use rights and Amendments to LEP 1990 (whether entitlements were
taken up). Visual context of Escarpment lands (Visual Quality Analysis of Escarpment Values
dsb 2007). Appropriate built form principles - Built Form Principles Architectus 2007(see
Appendix C of the Explanatory Document). Review of geotechnical history of the Escarpment
Area and documented slip sites. Staging of future development (West Dapto as it affects
interface areas and the lower slope of the Study Area). Density of development from east to
west. Bushfire and location of APZ. Accessibility and transport.
4.5 Landscape
4.5.1 Principles
Conservation of the natural beauty of the landscape acknowledging itsinherent contribution to the quality of life of residents of the area.
Consideration of interface area with National Parks/Reserves or otherenvironmentally significant land.
Protection of existing open space and green wedges/corridors as asignificant contribution to the visual landscape.
Achieve net gain in the scenic and aesthetic values of the Escarpment .
Promotion of a pattern of landuse sympathetic to the valuable Escarpmentlandscape.
4.5.2 Issues
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
51/104
Built development should not adversely affect the appearance and characterof the landscape and be designed and sited to incorporate landscaping to
minimise visual impact.
4.6.2 Issues
Issues addressed include: the need to maintain agricultural land immediately adjacent to
suburban areas, changing agricultural practices, diversification to new crops such as vines,
market gardens/orchards which use polytunnels and netting to protect crops but with significant
visual impact.
4.7 Water Resource
4.7.1 Principles
Limited development within the riparian corridor and its buffers.
Protection of the quality of water resources.
Limitations on development which has the potential to increase the risk offlooding elsewhere to an unacceptable level.
Establishment of buffers to protect the natural and cultural assets of ripariancorridors.
4.7.2 Issues
Issues considered included: the need to protect and enhance the quality and quantity of water
resources, establishment of buffers to protect the natural and cultural assets of the riparian zone
(width of riparian zone and buffer as defined by DIPNR 2004), consideration of the use of
sustainable drainage schemes (see recommended amendments to DCP No. 49 in Section 8
and Appendix D Illawarra Escarpment Water, Traffic and Geotechnical issues(Cardno 2007) of
the Explanatory Document, effluent management, impact of site runoff on downstream receiving
environment and implications for flooding.
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
52/104
5 STATUTORY CONTEXT
The statutory context which governs all development within the Escarpment area is discussedbriefly below. Appendix E of the Explanatory Document provides background information on
local and regional planning policies considered during preparation of the Strategy including the
Illawarra Regional strategy 2006 31.
5.1 Review of Wollongong DRAFT WLEP 2007
The protection of the Illawarra Escarpment values requires the implementation of appropriate
land use zones including objectives and permissible uses within an LEP. In addition, special
provisions may need to be introduced into the LEP, to ensure there is a regulatory basis for
decisions to be made.
A comprehensive review of proposed zones for areas above 50 m contained in the Draft
Wollongong and West Dapto LEPs was undertaken to assess whether the recommended zones
fit well with the objectives of the IESMP for those areas and whether development rights,
perceived or not, will be impacted by the new zone provisions. The review was based on plans
currently available in the public arena and which have been submitted to DoP for review.
The approach was to consider whether the proposed zones provide an adequate fit given the
overall intent of enabling a conservation outcome for the Escarpment, while allowing some
limited development opportunities. As a consequence, a number of recommendations were
made which would require amendment of the proposed zoning maps following due
consideration by Council.
The analysis highlighted a number of matters to be considered in relation to the proposed
zonings not least of which is further consideration of the sensitive environments to which a
number of zones apply, and the significant constraints posed to development. These
constraints would merit in some instances stricter zoning provisions to achieve an adequate
conservation outcome for the most sensitive Escarpment lands. In other areas which do not
have significant environmental attributes, a greater development outcome may be achieved.
Although the IESMP identified the Landscape Support for Core and Escarpment Interface Areas
as offering some potential following consideration for development, HLA did not limit the review
of Draft WLEP 2007to these areas. Rather the approach taken was to secure the most
appropriate development in the most appropriate locations while taking account of the principles
outlined in Section 4.
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
53/104
SP2 Infrastructure
Table 2 below provides a summary of the proposed new zone and where possible itscorresponding existing zone under LEP 1990. It is noted that there is no direct correlation in
most instances between the zones as on close examination of the zoning provisions, there are
often significant differences between permissibility of landuses under LEP 1990 and both the
WLEP 2007 and Draft West Dapto LEP 2006 (see Appendix E of the Explanatory Document).
Table 2: Comparison of Zoning
Wollongong LEP 1990 Draft DRAFT WDRAFT WLEP 2007
1 Non Urban RU2 Rural Landscape
4(c) Extractive Industrial Zone RU1 Primary Production
7(a) Special Environmental Protection E2 Environmental Conservation
7(b) Environmental ProtectionConservation
E2 Environmental Conservation
E3 Environmental Management
7(c) Environmental ProtectionResidential
E4 Environmental Living
7(c1) Environmental Protection RuralResidential
E4 Environmental Living
7(d) Environmental Protection PortHacking River
E2 Environmental Conservation
8(a) National Park E1 National Parks and Nature Reserves
Note: The same zones apply to both WLEP 2007 and Draft WD LEP 2006 with the exception of the E1 zone
The statutory provisions contained in the Draft WLEP 2007are further considered in Section 6
of this report.
5.2.2 West Dapto LEP 2006
The western extent of the proposed West Dapto Release area is delineated on the Land ZoningMap attached to the Draft LEP. A significant proportion of land currently defined as Landscape
Support for Core and Escarpment Interface within the Study Area boundary has been included
within the proposed release area. A variety of zonings has been applied to the lands as follows:
E2 Environmental Conservation
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
54/104
developed for consideration by Council. These matter will be discussed when the WDLEP maps
are further considered at the final stage of the West Dapto planning process.
5.2.3 Commentary
All land which was previously zoned 1 Non Urban, 4(c), 7(b), 7(c), 7(c1) and 7(d) under LEP
1990 was considered. At all times reference was made to the vegetation mapping in the IESMP
to identify areas where significant vegetation communities and habitats are located. This
enabled HLA to identify interface areas with National Parks/Reserves, EEC, green
wedges/green corridors and riparian corridors, all critical to maintaining the complex biodiversity
of the areas.
Early discussion at internal workshops highlighted the need to provide a zone which recognised
the high conservation significance of in particular, Core vegetation, and provided a further level
of protection for escarpment vegetation not contained in National Parks and Reserves. The E2
Environmental Conservation zone was selected as the best fit, and to further highlight the
importance of this zone in conserving the biodiversity of the Escarpment Area, dwellings were
removed as a land use permissible with consent.
This presented a number of issues not least of which was dwelling entitlement and as a
consequence a split zoning approach was adopted which sought to place areas of Core
vegetation particularly at higher altitudes within the E2 Environmental Conservation zone, while
enabling limited development on E3 Environmental Management zoned land. The
accompanying A0 maps show that land zoned 7(b) Environmental Protection has been included
in both the E2 Environmental Conservation and E3 Environmental Management zones. This
inclusion does not alter the original intent of the 7(b) zone but ensures a high level of protection
is afforded to areas of the highest quality in terms of landscape, diversity of wildlife, specialbeauty and to land of cultural and heritage significance.
Particular attention was paid to benched areas within the Escarpment associated with
decommissioned mine sites and mines still in operation and bench areas in the Cliff Coast
precinct from Coledale to Wombarra. The COI recommended that residential development
should not extend up into the Escarpment in the Cliff Coast precinct and dwellings should not be
located beyond the western boundary of existing development in the area. The visual quality
analysis carried out by dsb supports this contention and the 140m contour was determined asan appropriate zone boundary, given the visual significance and other constraints, including
bushfire, to development in the area.
The western boundary of properties on Rixon Pass Road and Bulli Pass were also selected to
id l b d b E E i l C i d E E i l
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
55/104
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
56/104
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
57/104
cdr
31052007www
.hla
-env
iro
.com
.au
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
58/104
6 REVIEW OF DRAFT WOLLONGONG DRAFT WLEP
2007 PLANNING INSTRUMENT6.1 LEP Text
The written document accompanying the LEP maps provides the statutory framework within
which development is considered. This text was reviewed together with all Schedules to the
text and recommendations workshopped with WCC staff. In addition mechanisms to enable
development in Areas of Special Interest were developed and recommended for inclusion in the
Draft WLEP 2007(see Section 7).
6.2 Part 1 - Preliminary
For ease of reference Draft WLEP 2007has been subdivided into five Parts, six Schedules and
a dictionary. Part 1 refers to the aims of the Plan, various instruments which have been
repealed in the preparation of the Plan and the State and regional environmental policies which
may/ may not apply.
6.3 Part 2 Permitted or Prohibited Development
6.3.1 Land Use Zones
Part 2 of the Draft WLEP 2007 refers to Permitted or Prohibited Development. It addresses
matters such as zone objectives, permitted and prohibited uses, subdivision requirements and
works permissible without consent.
Table E2 in Appendix E of the Explanatory Document provides a summary of the landuses
permissible with/without consent which were previously in LEP 1990 but have now been
included or excluded as the case may be, in the current review of planning instruments. The
range of permissible uses within the nominated land use zones is in the main consistent across
all draft LEPs in the LGA, and as a consequence Draft WLEP 2007 is referenced for
comparison with LEP 1990.
As the WLEP 2007 has not been subject to the formal public consultation process, the
information provided is indicative only and will be subject to review at a later date.
HLA recommends that the Land Use Table be amended as follows:
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
D l t t d l t f d l t ith t t
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
59/104
- Delete exempt development from development without consent.
- Insert in permitted with consent ecotourism.
Zone E4 Environmental Living
- Insert bed and breakfast accommodation and ecotourism as
permissible with development consent.
6.3.2 Zone Objectives
Each of the zones within the WLEP 2007 contains a set of objectives specific to the desired
outcomes for the zone. At the time of the preparation of this report, the objectives were stillbeing considered internally by Council staff. However it is clear that the objectives for the key
zones within the Escarpment Area namely E2, E3, E4 and RU2 do not reflect the desired
outcomes of the IESMP. While the E3 Environmental Management Zone contains an objective
relating to the location of development only on lands cleared of vegetation, this is not reflected
in the other nominated zones. Nor is the overall conservation objective which underpins the
IESMP given adequate recognition.
To ensure there is a clear link between the IESMP and the statutory framework controllingdevelopment in the Escarpment Area, the objectives outlined in Section 4 of the IESMP must be
embodied in the new objectives being considered as part of WLEP 2007. This will ensure that
the findings of the considerable volume of work which has preceded the drafting of the LEP, will
be recognised as providing a sound basis on which to develop the statutory framework
necessary to ensure implementation of the IESMP in the Escarpment Area.
In summary initial review of WLEP 2007 indicates:
Objectives relating to clearing of vegetation in E3 should be in E2.
An objective in E4 relates to providing for low impact residentialdevelopment in areas with limited ecological, scientific or aesthetic values.
However the second objective is to ensure that residential development
does not have an adverse effect on those values. The use of the words
adverse impact on limited values, seems contradictory. (Note: These are
template requirements for the Draft LEP derived by DoP).
There needs to be a clear definition of ecological values. For instance in E2and E3 what is the difference between high ecologicaland special
ecologicalvalues and in E4 limited ecologicalvalues. . (Note: These are
template requirements to the Draft LEP derived by DoP).
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
The above matters were workshopped internally with WCC planning staff and the following
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
60/104
The above matters were workshopped internally with WCC planning staff and the following
amendments recommended for inclusion in Draft WLEP 2007.
Amendments to Zone Objectives insert the following:
Zone RU2 Rural Landscape
- To retain, manage or restore native vegetation.
Zone E2 Environmental Conservation
- To retain and enhance the visual and scenic qualities of the Illawarra
Escarpment.
- To prevent clearing of native vegetation.
Zone E3 Environmental Management
- To retain and enhance the visual and scenic qualities of the Illawarra
Escarpment.
- To ensure that the form and siting of structures, the colours and
materials of the structures and its landscaping, are appropriate for and
harmonise with the bushland character of the locality.
- To ensure development is designed sited and managed to avoid or
mitigate any adverse environmental impact on any significant
vegetation community and the ecological buffer required to protect
that significant vegetation community.
Zone E4 Environmental Living
- To ensure that the form and siting of structures, the colours andmaterials of the structure and its landscaping are appropriate for and
harmonise with the bushland character of the locality.
- To ensure development is designed, sited and managed to avoid or
mitigate any adverse environmental impact on any significant
vegetation community and the ecological buffer required to protect
that significant vegetation community.
6.3.3 Additional Permitted/ Prohibited Uses
Clause 14 of the Draft WLEP 2007refers to development listed in Schedule 1 to the Draft WLEP
2007 which may be carried out with consent or if the schedule provides without consent, on
nominated parcels of land It is noted that this clause overrides the Land Use Table or other
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
It is recommended that the provision of this clause be expanded to include specific provisions
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
61/104
It is recommended that the provision of this clause be expanded to include specific provisions
which relate to the subdivision of land within the E3 Environmental Management zone. For
example the provision may state:
(3) Council may when considering the subdivision of land within the E3
Environmental Management zone, require the amalgamation of a contiguous
lot/s or certificates of title held by the owner/s of the land which is the subject
of the application.
6.4 Part 3 Exempt and Complying Development
6.4.1 Exempt Development
Part 3 of the WLEP 2007 relates to exempt and complying development. For the purposes of
the Draft LEP, Clause 16 identifies exempt development as development which may be carried
out without the need for development consent, provided it has a minimal environmental impact
and is not carried out in critical habitat or in wilderness area. Clause 18 of the WLEP 2007
states that exempt or complying development must not be carried out on any environmentally
sensitive areas for exempt or complying development. Of relevance are the following:
f) land identified in this or any other environmental planning instrument as being
of high Aboriginal cultural significance or high biodiversity significance; or
g) land reserved as a state conservation area under theNational Parks and
Wildlife Act 1974; or
h) land reserved or dedicated under the Crown Lands Act 1989 for the
preservation of flora, fauna, geological formation on for other environmentalprotection purposes; or
i) land identified as being critical habitat under theThreatened Species
Conservation Act 1995 or Part 7A of theFisheries Management Act 1994.
It is noted that exempt development is permitted without consent in the E3 Environmental
Management zone. As discussed above, Clause 18(i) states that exempt development must not
be carried out on any environmentally sensitive areas including land identified as critical habitat
under the TSC Act 1995. Inclusion of exempt development as a use permissible without consentin this zone places the onus on the potential developer to ensure compliance with clause 18(i).
It is recommended that the provisions of clause 18(i) be strengthened and the potential
developer be directed to a map or document such as the Bioregional Assessment (NSW 2002)
which highlights vulnerable ecosystems, species and their habitats. This is critical given the high
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
be further expanded to include a number of the built form development standards
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
62/104
be further expanded to include a number of the built form development standards
recommended in the proposed amendment to DCP No. 49 (see Section 8).
6.5 Part 4 Principal Development Standards
6.5.1 Lot Size
The minimum lot size for a dwelling is clearly set out in the Table attached to clause 20A(1). It
provides that land in environmentally sensitive and rural areas in the Study area maintain the
existing 40 ha minimum size. Land which was previously 7(c) did not have a minimum lot size
under LEP 1990. The WLEP 2007 provides that this land, in the main, has an E4 Environmental
Living zone which enables a minimum lot size of 1000m2
for land generally north of Cordeaux
Heights (with the exception of Figtree), compared with 2 ha to the south. This is considered
reasonable given the predominantly rural nature of land to the south and the expansive views,
particularly from the West Dapto Bowl, afforded of proposed E4 areas.
6.6 Part 5 Miscellaneous Provisions
It is recommended that special provisions are included in the new zoning document which would
give statutory effect to some of the initiatives designed to provide the mechanisms which deliver
the vision in the IESMP. Adoption of these discretionary provisions in Part 5 Miscellaneous
Provisions will provide greater strength to their implementation than having these matters dealt
with through a DCP or Policy.
Special provisions may relate to land which has a particular hazard, environmental and design
constraints such as flood, significant vegetation, riparian corridors, bushfire risk, geotechnical,water catchments and the like, and which are consistent with relevant State and Regional
policies.
6.6.1 Relevant Provisions
Part 5 of WLEP 2007details miscellaneous provisions which must be addressed where relevant
for any development in the LGA. The Miscellaneous Provisions clauses of relevance to the
Study Area include:
24. Exceptions to Development Standards.
24(6) consent must not be granted under this clause for subdivision of land
in Zone RU1, RU2, RU3, RU4, R5, E2, E3 and E4 if:
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
Recommendation: None
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
63/104
Recommendation: None
31 Development within Proximity of a Rail Corridor The objective of this
clause is to ensure that development for the purpose of residentialaccommodation or other noise sensitive buildings within 60 m of an
operating rail corridor are not adversely affected by rail noise or vibration.
Consent will not be granted for a development unless all practical mitigation
measures for rail noise or vibration recommended by the Rail Corporation of
NSW are incorporated into the development proposal.
Recommendation: None
32. Development within the Coastal Zone The objectives of this clause are toprovide for the protection of the coastal environment and to implement
the principles of the NSW Coastal Policy.
Recommendation:None
34. Preservation of Trees or Vegetation This clause seeks to preserve the
amenity of the area through the preservation of trees and other vegetation. It
applies to species or kinds of trees or other vegetation that are prescribed by
a DCP.Recommendation: What is at issue here is how will this provision be
applied as Council does not have a DCP outlining trees to be protected?
This Clause needs to be tightened to underpin the objective of no clearing of
native vegetation in Escarpment Areas. If clearing is required for some
reason: eg removal of noxious vegetation/declared weeds etc, there is a
need to specify whether consent is required in these instances.
35. Heritage Conservation The objectives of this clause are to conserve theenvironmental heritage of the City of Wollongong. It clearly sets out
requirements (or not) for consent to be obtained, when a heritage impact
assessment or heritage conservation management plan must be submitted,
notification requirements and conservation incentives.
Recommendation: None
36. Bush Fire Hazard Reduction Under Clause 36 bushfire hazard reduction
work authorised by the Rural Fires Act 1997may be carried out on any land
without consent. It also notes that the Rural Fires Act 1997makes provision
relating to the carrying out of development on bush fire prone land.
Recommendation: None
37 Development for Group Homes This clause enables the establishment of
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
lists development which requires consent and matters to be considered,
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
64/104
p q ,
together with development which does not require consent.
Recommendation: None
40 Temporary Use of Land This clause enables development on land within
any zone for a temporary purpose for a maximum period of 12 days.
Recommendation: None
41 Services- This clause states that consent will not be granted unless
adequate water supply and facilities for the removal or disposal of sewage
and facilities for drainage are available to that land, or adequate local and
regional infrastructure is available to service the development and future
residents. It is noted that subclause (2) states that the clause does not apply
where adequate arrangements satisfactory to the consent authority have
been made for the supply of the service and facilities and infrastructure
above.
Recommendation: None
42 Development on Flood Prone Lands This clause applies to land shown as
flood prone land on the Draft WLEP 2007 Flood Prone Land map.
Recommendation: None
44 Excavation and Filling of Land Development consent is required for
earthworks or to excavate or fill land, except if the proposed works are
considered by the consent authority to be of a minor nature.
Recommendation: Define of a minor nature.
46 Riparian Corridor This clause applies to riparian land identified in theRiparian Corridor Management Study (DIPNR 2004). It lists a number of
matters to be considered by the consent authority, prior to granting consent
to development on riparian land.
Recommendation: The Land Use Review Strategy recommends that there
should be no development for residential purposes within a riparian corridor
or its buffer zone. Clause 46 should be amended to include this provision
for all land within the Escarpment Area and reference made to the Riparian
Corridor DCP currently being prepared by Council which addresses matters
such as buffer widths and development/activities permissible in riparian
corridors. The provisions above must be supported by an accurate GIS
generated map of the waterways in the Escarpment area and illustrate the
recommended buffers
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
6.7.1 Land Management Agreement (LMA)
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
65/104
6 a d a age e t g ee e t ( )
Land Management Agreement Areas of Special Interest
This clause would require Council to grant consent to certain nominated types of development
only if there was a LMA in place for the subject land. This could be done by way of a deferred
commencement consent. It would be supported by a Schedule to the amending LEP containing
a pro-forma LMA and would identify the purpose, objective and general principles of the LMA .
This clause would be particularly relevant for development in the Areas of Special Interest.
For other lands within the Escarpment Area the following could apply:
Land Management Agreement - Development of Other Land within the Escarpment Lands
1 In deciding whether to grant consent to any application to carry out
development of land within the escarpment lands, the Council shall take into
account the provisions of any Land Management Agreement.
2 Where no Land Management Agreement is in place for land which is the
subject of any application to carry out development of land within the
escarpment lands, the Council must consider whether it is desirable, having
regard to the identified outcomes for the escarpment lands as nominated in
the Illawarra Escarpment Strategic Management Plan, for there to be a Land
Management Agreement for the land which is the subject of the application
for development.
3 If the Council is of the opinion that it is desirable for there to be a Land
Management Agreement in respect of the land that is the subject of any
application to carry out development, it may impose a condition on any
consent it grants which requires that a Land Management Agreement beestablished and executed before development of the land may occur.
6.7.2 Restrictions on Granting Certain Consents
This clause would identify a number of specific matters requiring consideration by Council when
determining an application for development within the Illawarra Escarpment as defined in the
IESMP. These matters might include access, provision of water and sewer services, water cycle
management, water quality, land stability, visual effects and bushfire hazard, as well asadditional matters such as the advertising of the proposal, the delivery of conservation
outcomes, the need for clearing, concurrence from (or referral to) regulatory authorities,
justification of the proposal, built form appearance, siting, scale, and bulk of buildings.
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
d) the development will have a neutral or beneficial effect on bushland
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
66/104
and the environment; and
e) the development will not be adversely affected by bushfire, landslip orother natural hazards; and
f) the allotment on which the development is proposed has adequate
services (water, sewer, access and the like) available to meet the
need generated for these services by the proposed development; and
g) the development is ecologically sustainable; and
h) the development is not visually intrusive; and
i) the development and the environment of the allotment on which it is
located will be so managed as not to have any long term detrimental
impact on biodiversity; and
j) it has taken into consideration any submissions made by the DoP and
the DCC concerning the application.
Dwelling-houses in Zone No. E3 Environmental Management
14A The Council may consent to the erection of a dwelling-house on an allotment
of land within the Zone No. E3 Environmental Management provided that:
(a) there is no dwelling-house on the allotment; and
(b) the allotment existed on commencement of this Plan or was
created by this Plan; and
(c) the rights for a dwelling-house on the allotment have not been
transferred to another allotment; and
(d) the erection of the proposed dwelling-house and associated
activities on the allotment will not detract from the environment
by way of visual intrusion, vegetation clearance or drainage
pollution; and
(e) the erection of the proposed dwelling house, ancillary structures
and access does not involve clearing of native vegetation; and
(f) the allotment on which the dwelling-house is proposed is
adequately serviced with water and sewer facilities for the
purposes of a dwelling-house; and
(g) the proposed dwelling-house will not be located on bushfire
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
67/104
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
Definition to include reference to no clearing of native vegetation to provide access.
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
68/104
Land Management Agreement;
means a formally executed deed of agreement between the Council and a
land owner or owners for the cooperative conservation and management of
the biodiversity values of the escarpment lands.
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
7 IMPLEMENTATION MECHANISMS
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
69/104
7.1 IntroductionThe IESMP recommended a number of methods to conserve and manage the Illawarra
Escarpment as part of its implementation strategy. These included traditional land use planning
mechanisms (i.e. land use zoning) and a range of mechanisms for converting land into public
ownership and encouraging conservation of privately owned land.
Whilst not all of the mechanisms identified in the IESMP would fall under the umbrella of
strategic planning, the interrelationship and integration of these measures is important toachieving a successful outcome in terms of preservation of the Escarpment values.
What must also be considered is the mechanism by which the objective of net gain in the
scenic and aesthetic values can be achieved especially on areas within the Biophysical and
Landscape Support for Core areas which could be in multiple ownership. This may be through
site amalgamation and various incentives or creation of a Community title over the land.
Draft WLEP 2007 and the revised DCP No. 49 must include a well resolved implementationstrategy to be applied to land especially in the more environmentally sensitive areas of the
Escarpment. Various implementation mechanisms which have been considered as part of this
study including:
Incentives;
Existing Use;
Tradeable Development Rights;
Transferable Development Rights;
Entitlement Transfer Scheme;
Green Offsets;
Rate Rebates; and
Land Management Agreements.
These strategies are discussed in detail in AppendixG of the Explanatory Document and the
recommended implementation strategy is set out below.
7 2 Recommended Implementation Strategy
Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy
to the LEP, the level of protection required for the Escarpment, while allowing limited
development will be achievable
7/31/2019 2007_06_01 - Illawarra Escarpment Land Use Review Strategy Pt 1
70/104
development, will be achievable.
In the Areas of Special Interest and in a limited number of areas with Landscape Support for
Core and Escarpment Interface classification, landowners could get together and make a single
application to Council to develop land within a predetermined environment envelopewhich
takes account of the environmental constraints to developing the land. The environmental
envelopewould sit on land previously cleared and outside of riparian zones (see Section 8.3.1).
Prior to consent being issued, a LMA would need to be prepared for adjoining Core land which
would remain in private ownership but with clear management outcomes. The LMA would cover
matters such as weed management, feral animal control, riparian corridor management and so
on. The introduction of a LMA then affords protection to remnant vegetation, vulnerable
ecosystems, core habitat, wildlife corridors and riparian zones.
This process would involve a number of clear steps as follows:
1 Property owners discuss potential to amalgamate holdings into one single lot
under a single title Community Title or the like.
2 In the Areas of Special Interest it would be possible following a series of
studies to determine an environmental envelopefor the land. The
advantage of this process is that it enables landowners whose land offers
some development potential, to negotiate with adjoining landowners for
access across properties, inclusion of additional cleared land and so on.
3 The remainder of the land is set aside and managed for conservation. It is
then the subject of a mutually agreed LMA which is the subj