62
AEG Annual Meeting-Boston Mitigation Design of Geohazards Caused by Fire at Hydroelectric Facilities W.H. Godwin, CEG William Lettis & Associates Don Quigley, GE MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. C. Liu, PE, SFPUC Engineering & Design Bureau November 1, 2006

2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

AEG Annual Meeting-Boston

Mitigation Design of Geohazards Causedby Fire at Hydroelectric Facilities

• W.H. Godwin, CEG William Lettis & Associates• Don Quigley, GE MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc.• C. Liu, PE, SFPUC Engineering & Design Bureau

November 1, 2006

Page 2: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Introduction

• Purpose• Case Study

– Early Fire– Damage Assessment– Aerial and Field Mapping– Mitigation Design– Construction

• Acknowledgements and Questions

Page 3: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Case Study

Kirkwood Powerhouse & Penstock Facilities

Tuolumne County, California

Page 4: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Early Fire

Early Fire OverviewAugust 9-14 2004

1600 acres

Page 5: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Early Fire

Page 6: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Early Fire

• Life & Property– CCSF Life & Property– Public Life & Property

• Soil & Water Quality• Special Areas

-Wild and Scenic River-Heritage Oaks

Page 7: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Early Fire

Cottages andFacilities

Page 8: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Early Fire• Conceptual Treatments for:

-Powerhouse-Residences-Roads-Penstock-Transmission Lines

• Detailed engineering assessment of drainageand structure protection by SFPUC

Page 9: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Early Fire

Page 10: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Damage Assessment

• Erosion potential• Rock fall Hazard• Penstock integrity• Drainage

improvements

Page 11: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Damage Assessment

Page 12: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Damage Assessment

Rock fall hazard

Page 13: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Damage Assessment

October Storm2004

Page 14: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Aerial and Field Mapping

View East

Page 15: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Aerial and Field Mapping

View West

Page 16: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Aerial and Field Mapping

Sawmill MtnGranodiorite(Ksm)

Page 17: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Aerial and Field Mapping

Granite Crk Tonalite (Jgc)

Page 18: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Aerial and Field Mapping

Valve house

Page 19: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Aerial and Field Mapping

Page 20: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Aerial and Field Mapping

Page 21: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Aerial and Field Mapping

Page 22: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Aerial and Field Mapping

Page 23: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Aerial and Field Mapping

Page 24: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Mitigation Design

• Rock Fall Simulation• HEC Modeling• Localized rock bolting, scaling and mesh• Culvert design• Revegetation

Page 25: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Mitigation Design

Input Parameters• Rock Shape• Rock size• Slope roughness• Slope length/angle

Output• Velocity• Bounce Height• Kinetic Energy

Colorado Rock Fall Simulation CRSPProgram

Page 26: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Mitigation DesignGeologic Hazard• Source Area• Source rocks• Slope• Critical Structures• Relative hazard

Page 27: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Mitigation Design

CRSP Inputs

Page 28: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Mitigation Design

Page 29: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Mitigation DesignSurface profile and Analysis Pts.

Bounce height vs. Slope length

Page 30: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Mitigation Design

• Design outputs for 11 fences• Energy ranges from 241kJ to 1575kJ• Bounce height (90%) range 3 ft to 24ft• Did not factor in trees as barriers• Fence Heights of 2 to 4 meters

Page 31: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Mitigation DesignHydrologic Analysis• 25 year return interval, 24-hour hydrologic

analysis for both pre- and post-fire conditions• 100 year return interval, 24-hour duration

hydrologic analysis for both pre- and post-fireconditions

• Calculation of parameters used in the HEC-1model followed the NRCS methodology.

Page 32: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Mitigation Design

Drainage Recommendations• New culvert design based on 25-yr return

period flows• Erosion Control applications• Rip rap and road crossings

Page 33: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Mitigation Design

Page 34: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation
Page 35: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation
Page 36: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation
Page 37: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Construction

December-May 2005• Rock fencing (3131LF)• Draped mesh, spot bolting• New access road and culverts• Hardened Crossings• Penstock drains and safety lines• New potable water tanks

Page 38: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation
Page 39: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation
Page 40: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation
Page 41: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation
Page 42: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation
Page 43: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation
Page 44: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation
Page 45: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation
Page 46: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation
Page 47: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation
Page 48: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation
Page 49: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation
Page 50: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation
Page 51: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation
Page 52: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation
Page 53: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation
Page 54: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation
Page 55: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation
Page 56: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation
Page 57: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation
Page 58: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation
Page 59: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation
Page 60: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation
Page 61: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation
Page 62: 2006 AEG Godwin presentation

Acknowledgments and Questions