2001_Matriz_y_Descripcion_de_Riesgos_de_HSE.ppt

7/29/2019 2001_Matriz_y_Descripcion_de_Riesgos_de_HSE.ppt

1/15

Prepared By: Aragn, Pilar Created: Dic 11 01; Print: 19-Sep-13

Pag: 1

BP COLOMBIA HSE RISK MATRIX 2001 - 2002

PROB

ABILITY%

100

0

0 100

Comfort

Unsure

Uncomfortable

Comfortable

DANGER

CAUTION SAFETY

CONTROL

MANAGEABILITY %

Workforce /Contractor

Engagement2001

Spills2001

EnvLiabilities

1%2001

WorkControls

2001

RTS2001

EmergencyResponse

New projects2001

Occup.Illness2001

Workcontrols

EmergencyResponse

New projects

RTS

Spills

OccupationalIllness

Env.Liabilities

1%

HSECompetencies


Engagement

CRANES

gHSErEMS

To check Risk descriptions make a click in the bubble

2002 RiskDescription

NOISE&

FLARE
http://gbc.bpweb.bp.com/hse/policy/hseright/index.htmhttp://ambogs605.bog.am.bp.com/livelink/livelink.exe/fetch/2000/10650/108649/177260/116850/customview.html?func=ll&objId=116850&objAction=browse&sort=namehttp://ambogs605.bog.am.bp.com/livelink/livelink.exe?func=ll&objId=4171949&objAction=browse&sort=namehttp://ambogs605.bog.am.bp.com/livelink/livelink.exe?func=ll&objId=4171949&objAction=browse&sort=namehttp://ambogs605.bog.am.bp.com/livelink/livelink.exe?func=ll&objId=4171949&objAction=browse&sort=namehttp://ambogs605.bog.am.bp.com/livelink/livelink.exe/fetch/2000/10650/108649/177260/116850/customview.html?func=ll&objId=116850&objAction=browse&sort=namehttp://gbc.bpweb.bp.com/hse/policy/hseright/index.htm


2/15


Pag: 2

BP COLOMBIA HSE RISK MATRIX - 2002

PROBA

BILITY%

100

0

0 100

DANGER

CAUTION SAFETY

CONTROL

MANAGEABILITY %

Workcontrols

EmergencyResponse

New projects

RTS

Spills

OccupationalIllness

Env.Liabilities

1%

HSECompetencies


Engagement

CRANES


Comfort

Unsure

Uncomfortable

Comfortable

gHSErEMS2002 RiskDescription

NOISE&

FLARE


3/15


Pag: 3

Workcontrols

EmergencyResponse

New projects

RTS

Spills

OccupationalIllness

Env.Liabilities

1%


Engagement

CRANES

SDLA HSE RISK MATRIX - 2002

PROBA

BILITY%

100

0

0 100

DANGER

CAUTION SAFETY

CONTROL

MANAGEABILITY %

Workcontrols

EmergencyResponse

New projects

Spills

OccupationalIllness

Env.Liabilities

1%

HSECompetencies


Engagement

CRANES


Engagement

RTS


Comfort

Unsure

Uncomfortable

Comfortable

gHSErEMS2002 RiskDescription

NOISE&

FLARE


4/15


Pag: 4

2002 HSE KEY MILESTONES

AREA 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q

Full implementation ofBuenas Posturas Program

100% Employees coverageergonomic program

Circadian RythmModulation Program

Sport Injuries reduction by50%

Skin Cancer PreventionProgram

100% contractorOccupational Illnesses

Reporting

8 Golden rules gap review Green Hats implementationwhole BU

Complete ASA roll outManagement review for

2002 EMSobjectives/targets

agreement

Spills certification for AreaAuthorities

Environmental ComplianceAudit (1% Obligations)

ISO 14001 Renovation

Noise Control strategy Total BU CO2 Emissions:570K tones

0 Uncontained oil spills

HSE Learning system

implemented(Competencies)

Hse Management program

for small contracts

Contractors Performance

Evaluation Process(Attachment H)

Inputs and Outputs Matrix:

Move to the upper rightquadrant on the inputs axis.

100% OHSAS 18001 Contractor's gHSErassurance process tool in

place. (Focus Programmes)Traction 100%

implemented

HSE

HEALTH

ENVIRONMENTA

SAFETY

PERFORMANCE CONTRACT HSE (DETAILED)

Bold and blue information: BU Milestones

Blue Information: SDLA Milestones


5/15

EMERGENCY RESPONSE FOR NEW PROYECTS

1.DIAGNOSIS/CURRENT CONDITION(Principal characteristics, or how health is affected, and/or management of this factor or risk.)At present BPX Colombia has a General Emergency Response Plan that guarantees proper response fromany of the operations work sites. The system includes permanent support personnel and equipment inthe CPFs as well as at work sites, according to the level of risk at the site and the number of employeesat each location. The system works in a network, in order to guarantee adequate support and interaction.However new areas planned to be access next year are remote areas that will be managed bycontractors (experienced?). Security issues limited the ability to respond in a prompt way.

- Magnitude of the Problem and Areas at RiskEmergencies are always a risk in any work environment. In our operations they are of considerableimportance due to the type of operations, and to the fact that they occur at great distances from centres

of resources, to the lack of infrastructure and resources in the region of Casanare, and to physicalsecurity risks as well.New projects pose a special risk due to the remoteness of the areas and type of workforce and contracts.- Population at RiskEventually, any person, operation or installation is susceptible of having an emergency situation. For thisreason the Plan provides support for any employee, subcontractor, visitor, or member of the communityas well as for any installation and equipment inside our premises.

2.STANDARDS AND POLICIES

1.1 EXISTING

BPXC Emergency Response Plan Local Emergency Plans (at each site) Definition of requirements for support personnel and equipment according to level of risk (as

part of the attachment H for contractors).

Training programs and conformation of Fire, Environmental and Fist Aid brigades Equipment and communication resources. (500K US invested on medical, fire and environmental

equipment to meet recommended support after B4 incident. 500K additional to be spend in 2002to complete 100%)

2.5 NEEDED

Training and conformation of response teams for new projects Equipment and resources for new projects in addition to the B4 recommendation Drills and integration with existing response plans Complete B4 recommendation (specialised training of fire brigades overseas and equipment)

3. PERFORMANCE MEASURESa. Result Performance MeasuresNumber of successful responses The number of successful responses to emergency situations/the totalnumber of emergency situations.

b. Process Performance Measures- Number of training hours and emergency response brigades conformed- The number of activities

carried out / the number of activities programmed.- Percentage of times the Plan is successfully implemented the percentage of companies that meet

the standards, and the % of successful implementation in each one.- % Lessons learned and action closed during drills or real medical/environmental and fire

emergencies.You may use various indicators in accordance with the activity or program; for example the number ofactivities carried out versus those programmed.

4. PLAN 2002

100% Contingency Plan Equipment 2Q 2002Brigade Refresh 2Q 2002Piedemonte Drills 1Q 3QSDLA Drills 2Q 4Q

General Drill Field and Bogota 4Q 2002100% Well control study 1QWell Control Training 1Q
http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/Documents%20and%20Settings/cardenmv/Desktop/archivos/archivo/Migracion/a%20Manejo%20Ambiental/Local%20Settings/Documents%20and%20Settings/gneccocc/Local%20Settings/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.IE5/490V8P07/BP_COLOMBIA_HSE_RISK_MATRIX.ppt


6/15

OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESSES

1. DIAGNOSIS/CURRENT CONDITION

(Principal characteristics, or how health is affected, and/or management of this factor or risk.)

High incidence of Noise Induce Hearing Loss, Manual Handling and postures related illnessesand occupational contact dermatitis are reported through a standardised reporting system bycontractors. Medical surveillance programs are designed to prevent and early detect new casesof occupational illnesses and ensure a reliable reporting system is in place. However changingOSHA regulations new contractors and emerging occupations risks pose a challenge to ensure100% coverage and standardisation of prevention and early detection programs

- Magnitude of the Problem and Areas at RiskBP Colombias performance contract will take into account frequency of new cases ofoccupational illnesses. 60% of all BP contractors are engaged on a standardised reportingsystem and control programs are in place. However new projects bring new contractors mostof them local contractors with limited knowledge of occupational health

-Population at RiskAll employees BP and contractors working for the operation are at risk of developing anoccupational illness depending on the critical and un controlled risk to which they are exposed.Most common risks on BPs operation are: Noise, Manual Handling, Inadequate Postures,Repetitive Trauma and Skin contact with chemicals

2. STANDARDS AND POLICIES

2.1 EXISTING

1. Health risk Assessment (risks vs. job tasks).2. Hearing Conservation Preventive Program3. Buenas Posturas Preventive Program4. Skin Cancer Preventive Program5. COSHH - CHEMS6. Absolute and relative health restrictions for work in the Field.7. Occupational Illness Reporting system

2.2 NEEDED

1. Standardise Medical surveillance Program and OSHA threshold values to ensure allnew cases reported meet desire criteria for all critical risks on 100% contractors.

2. Standardised criteria for medical examinations performed and physical fitness criteria

on BP and Contractor employees.3. HSE Performance Program for Small Contractors4. Ensure technical integrity and international standards are meet to control health risks

in all projects, on design phases.

3. PERFORMANCE MEASURES

3.1 Result Performance MeasuresPercentage of coverage Number of employees covered on medical surveillanceprograms(risk based)/number of employees exposed

2.3 Process Performance Measures% completion of activities The number of activities(preventive, training)programmed/number of activities planned.The percentage of companies that meet standards, and for each company, the frequency with

which those standards are met.You may use various indicators in accordance with the activity or program, for example: thenumber of activities carried out versus those programmed.

Graphs

S ill


7/15

Spills

1. DIAGNOSIS/ CURRENT STATUS(Main characteristics and possible effects on persons, the environment or operations of the riskor factor. Record the gaps identified during audits and reviews.)In the year 2001, 80 contained spills major than 10 Gal were reported for all BU (versus 70 in2000), which greatly exceeded the internal limit set of 28 (for SDLA). One (1) uncontainedproduction water spill achieved a water body with minimum impact. Zero oil spills recordableto London. Since July 2001 the new penalty law includes contamination as a fault that affect thpeoples liberty.- Potentiality: High recurrence means that the potentiality of affecting ecosystems is medium.One uncontained spills alert about increasing potentiality.

- Area of Risk: The regions water bodies that belong to the Cusiana River basin (All Cusiana,Cupiagua and Piedemonte rivers). The operational areas that can be affected due to ignition ofhydrocarbons or other combustible products.- Exposed:. The population downstream (mainly Aguazul) and the operators.

2. STANDARDS/ RULES/ PROCEDURES

2.1. Existing1. Procedures for transferring chemical products.2. Spill control training.3. Safety practice for transfer, store or transport fluids.2.2 Required

1. Review of the existing standards, rules, procedures in order to include lessons learned.

Enhance on new projects.

3. MITIGATING/CONTROL MEASURES3.1 ExistingDikes and contention infrastructure.Contingency Plan for spill control.Preventive maintenance program for valves, hoses and accessoriesRTS

3.2 RequiredIncrease the degree of risk assessment and the level of supervision of fluid transfer andtransport jobs.Make drivers/operators aware.Impact the personal behavior

4. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

4.1 On ResultsNumber of spills in the year 2002 vs. Internal goal.Number of training sessions given/Number of training sessions planned4.2 On ManagementActivities Performed/Activities Planned

5. PLAN 2002- Brief summary of key actions for managing the risk for the period. . Review procedures. Introduce lessons learnt.. Continue Spill prevention campaign.. Assure authority areas certification. Quarterly meetings with contractors in order to assess performance.. Incentives for exemplary Contractors.. Perform Training Program


8/15

Environmental Liabilities (1%)

1. DIAGNOSIS/ CURRENT STATUS(Main characteristics and possible effects on persons, the environment or operations of the riskor factor. Record the gaps identified during audits and reviews.). Pending compliance of obligations regarding forced investment (1%).. The legislation regarding these obligations is not clear.. Estimated cost of US $ 809K for best scenario, and US $ 70 Million at worst scenario. The community and the local authorities in Aguazul and Tauramena municipalities are veryinterested in these investments be met as soon as possible.. There are no overdue obligations.

Potentiality:- Low risk of lawsuit or investigation by State control agencies.- Medium risk of negative effects on company reputation due to complaints from NGOs.- High risk of legislation clarification with worst scenario as highly possible.

Areas at Risk: The companys reputation. Economical impact onUS $ 70 Million, at worst scenario


2.1. Existing. Law 99, 1993, paragraph from article No. 43.. BP Instructions for compliance with the 1% obligation, based on consultation with an ExternalExpert.

2.2 Required. Confirmation by Ministry of Environment about interpretation of the forced investment of1% provision.. Authorisation from Ministry of Environment for 1% forced investment proposed actionsimplementation.

3. MITIGATING/CONTROL MEASURES3.1 Existing. Compliance Plans and Actions for 1% forced investment submission, according toEnvironmental Licenses requirements.3.2 Required. Strategy Implementation for compliance of the 1% forced investment suggested by theExternal Expert (comply without waiting for approval from the Ministry prior written noticefrom BP).Elaboration of 1% investments report.Guarantee budget availability for complete Compliance Plan for next four years (2002-2005).

4. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS4.1 On ResultsReduction of 70% economical risk, based on worst scenario, for 3Q, 2002.4.2 On Management

Guarantee financial process for 1% remaining obligations for 4Q, 2002.

5. PLAN 2001/ 2002- Brief summary of key actions for managing the risk during theeriod.

. Elaboration of 1% investments report with records clearly identified.

. Present report to Partners and define investment plan .

. Guarantee budget availability for complete Compliance Plan for next four years (2002-2005).

. Monitoring ruling with Environmental Authorities or National Congress, and work with ACP.


9/15

NOISE

1 DIAGNOSIS / CURRENT STATUS

In the year 2001, BXC has two lawsuits (LTT and BA facilities) for neighbours due to noiseproblems. In other five sites BPXC received claims related to noise also. Tutelas can bedecided in very short time (10 days) to close or suspend activities.

Potentiality: In many sites BXC has neighbours living in the surroundings of the operationsarea and the legal standards are very restricted. In the other hand, there are lawyersdedicated to noise lawsuits.Area of Risks: reputation decrease: the operational areas that can be affecting the

communitiesExposed: The population near to operations area and field personnel.

2 STANDARDS/ RULES PROCEDURES

2.1 Existing

National standards related to noise

Noise assessment for some locations

2.2 Required

Noise assessment and management process

Lessons learned review

Environmental management systems ISO 14001 Noise Programme

3 MITIGATIN /CONTROL MEASURES

3.1 Existing

Isolation structures in some facilities

Monitoring

Communities claims attendances process

3.2 Required

Conduct Noise assessment in order to establish priorities and management plans

Establishing regular process to noise control in WEO and Drilling and new production

facilities

4 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

4.1 On results

Regular process in place for 2Q, 2002

4.2 On Management

Activities performed / Activities planned

5 PLAN 2001 / 2002

1. Define TOR for noise assessment2. Conduct noise assessment3. Define noise control process4. Review of the procedure or absence there of


10/15

Cranes SDLA/Piedemonte

1. DIAGNOSIS/ CURRENT STATUS(Main characteristics and effects on people, the environment, or risk or factor operations;list gaps identified by audits and reviews) 61% coverage progress in bps crane, contractor and suppliers management

programme. No medium or high potential accidents occurred in load lifting operations. Improvement evidenced in competence level of operators, riggers and signal men. High degree of management commitment among contractors and suppliers. Certified cranes 97 Certified crane operators 272 Crane operator training hours 4.026 Courses to crane operators 19 Certified riggers / signal men 111 Courses to riggers / signal men 10 riggers / signal men training hours 888 Trained Supervisors and Area Authorities 413 Training hours to Supervisors and Area Authorities 1,742 Courses to Supervisors and Area Authorities 17


2.1. ExistingGuide Manual on Safe Crane OperationPocket Guide for Crane OperatorsAcceptance Process (Certification) for cranes, equipment and load hoisting operationsCertification process for operators, riggers and signal men

Work site proceduresReference in Attachments H

2.2 RequiredProcess to certifycrane operation supervisors

3. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS3.1 Results Maintain 100% of certifications on equipment and personnel involved in crane and hoistingoperationsRaise crane programme implementation level to 80%3.2Management -

Develop assurance model, BPs Plan related to competence, crane integrity andhoisting elements, application of field standards and procedures, contracting craneservice with third parties.

Perform audits to establish progress in implementing BPs Crane Programme amongcrane service contractors and suppliers.

4. PLAN 2002

Follow-up on recommendations, as per review of actionsestablished in the 2001 Audit Review.

2Q/02

Permanent verification of field management systemapplication.

Permanent/02

Demand and follow up on Certification of competencies formanoeuvre supervisors among crane service contractor andsupervisors.

2Q/02

NON CONFORMITY communication process to Cup FieldManager Crane Champion.

Permanent/02


11/15

ROAD TRANSPORTATION SAFETY (RTS)Piedemonte

1 DIAGNOSIS / CURRENT STATUSBP RTS programme has produced the following results to date:

From 60 recordable road accidents in 2001, 83% were classified as low potential and 17% asmedium potential

1050 certified drivers from January to date 2300 technical and mechanical vehicle certifications From approximately 500 vehicles used in the operation services, 90% meet RTS standards Approximately 300 vehicles are using Drive Right

Potentiality: The accidentally rate of operation-related vehicles has reduced substantially, especially inthe SDLA area. As regards the new development areas, our concern is linked to vehicles from minorcontractors, the communities, new projects and Bogot, which is a sensitive area.Risk Areas

Cultural factors, which make our RTS procedures difficult, much more significant in remote areaswith respect to SDLA Poor control and surveillance by authorities New communities, especially those having influence on new projects in the areas of Niscota,

Florea, Pauto, etc. Environmental risks and new rural roads Bogot is a risk factor where we must reinforce the RTS policy

Exposed partiesAll the personnel of bp, Contractors, Sub-contractors, communities influencing operation areas in Casanareand Bogot

2 STANDARDS / RULES / PROCEDURES2.1 Existingbp Policy, Field Instructions, RTS Guide, Dissemination Campaigns, Vehicle Certification, Drivers Training,Motorcycle Safe Driving Course, Incident Reporting and Investigation, Interaction with authorities andcommunities, Installation of trip meters (Drive Rights)2.2 Required

1. To improve community awareness

2. To extend scope of the RTS programme to the new projects and communities of influence

3. To promote and provide advice on traffic controls by regional authorities4. To include this new scope in the 2002 budget

3 MITIGATION/CONTROL MEASURES3.1 Existing

RTS audits for transport contractors Access control and review of components of bp-controlled area access programme Road Monitoring, together with road authorities Trip monitoring programme using Drive Right devices Community awareness and education programme (advertising, schools, community boards) Driver training and certification programme Vehicles are inspected by third parties on a periodic basis

3.2 RequiredTo promote awareness regarding benefits brought about by traffic control on regional and village roadsTo reinforce compliance with bp Road Safety requirements for ContractorsRoad Construction and Maintenance Programme belonging to the operation, as per standards

4 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS4.1 Result-related:

10% reduction in 2002 vs. 2001 incidents 100% certification to drivers and vehicles used in the operation 100% interaction with Community Action Boards, School Directors in the communities influenced

by development of new projects to enhance the degree of awareness regarding Road Safety4.2 Management-related:

To ensure that 100% of contracting companies develop the RTS Programme in their areas ofinfluence

To ensure that the RTS Programme is 100% complied with by bp drive rs

5 2002 PLAN- Brief summary of key actions to manage risk during the periodTo reinforce the dissemination campaign through the radio among newcommunities.

Permanent 02

To disseminate use of Drive Right to control speed of equipment working forthe operation.

Permanent 02

To ensure compliance with actions derived from audits to contractors. 1Q/2002

Graphs


12/15

Contractor Involvement / Commitment-SDLA/Piedemonte

1. DIAGNOSIS / CURRENT STATUS(Main characteristics and effects on people, the environment, or risk or factor operations; list

gaps identified by audits and reviews) Lack of contract administrators competence with regard to HSE programmes Contractor HSE evaluation programme is not known and application there of is

inconsistent Lack of competence among contractor HSE advisors Poor level of HSE competence at the line

2. STANDARDS / RULES / PROCEDURES

2.1. ExistingHSE Requirements in Contracts - Attachments HContract start-up meetingsPeriodic contractor HSE evaluationSole CCS - RUC Contractor RegistryContract Management Trainingbp training and programmes and campaigns extended to contractors

2.2 Required1. Implementation of contractor Competence Evaluation Programme2. Contractor Management must prove and comply with their HSE commitment3. HSE training and certification programme for all contract administrators4. Verification of HSE competences among contractor HSE advisors

3. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

3.1 Result-related: 100% of contract administrators evaluate their contractors from an HSE standpoint 100% certification in HSE administration for contract administrators 100% verification of HSE competences for contractor advisors To ensure that HSE advisors develop 100% of their programmes, in line with bp

standards

3.2 Management-related: To develop HSE training modules for contract administrators To optimise Attachment H To continue with the HSE competence programme for local contractors

5. 2002 PLAN

To continue with the HSE competence programme for local contractors 3Q02To transfer the Green Hard Hat programme and controlled orientation to

contractors.

3Q02

To continue with and improve the contractor periodic HSE performanceevaluation process.

2Q02


13/15

HSE Competencies

1. DIAGNOSIS / CURRENT STATUS(Main characteristics and effects on people, the environment, or risk or factor operations; listgaps identified by audits and reviews)

No corporate policy is available to develop and measure competencies There is no definition of position roles and responsibilities to develop the scheme at an

organisational level There are different competency approaches within bp Competence definition at contractor level is affected by their economic level The level of competencies required in the oil industry activity is affected by the lack of

consistency of existing national programmes

2. STANDARDS/ RULES / PROCEDURES

2.1. Existing

Models developed by Human Resources Models developed by HSE Models developed by the line

2.2 RequiredTo define a corporate HSE competency model

3. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS3.1 Result-related:

100% involvement of top and middle management in development and approval ofHSE competency model for bp personnel

100% application of HSE competency model for all bp personnel 100% certified executing authorities and contracts administrators

3.2 Management-related: To develop HSE competency model for all bp personnel

4. 2002 PLAN

To implement HSE competence programme and develop it for HSE and the line- 3Q/2002

W k C t l SDLA/Pi d t


14/15

Work Control SDLA/Piedemonte

1. DIAGNOSIS / CURRENT STATUS(Main characteristics and effects on people, the environment, or risk or factor operations; list

gaps identified by audits and reviews)Current status of the PTW system indicates that it is working in a more consistent mannerwithin processes developed at the processing plants. The system should be further reinforced ithe areas of WEO and Drilling.Elements for field organisation work control are the PTW system, risk evaluations, JSAs, workprocedures, and audits for compliance with such controls.Incident and accident investigations of events that have taken place indicate that there are

substantial improvement opportunities in these processes or controls.

2. STANDARDS / RULES / PROCEDURES

2.1. ExistingWork Permit PracticeIsolation PracticeField Standing InstructionsLocal regulationsRisk and audit evaluationsInduction and Green Hard HatsManagement of ChangeSimops8 Golden Rules

2.2 Required1. To standardise risk evaluation practices2. To standardise the compliance verification audit scheme3. To comply with the training and certification programme for authorities4. To ensure compliance with Green Hard Hat programme5. To comply with bp standards

3. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS3.1 Result-related:

100% certification of area authorities 100% dissemination of PTW practice 100% routine and low risk permits approved by the respective Managers 100% compliance with non-conformities identified in daily reviews, audits, etc.

3.2 Management-related:To achieve 100% Management commitment for compliance with performance indicators

6. 2002 PLAN

To implement the PTW system in all new projects. Permanent/02To strengthen the PTW system in Drilling and WEO works. 2Q/02To ensure that contractors develop the PTW system in their areas of influence. Permanent

To increase the number of audits by the line as well as their quality. Permanent


15/15

ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITIES (1%) (APPLIES TO SDLA & PIEDEMONTE)

1. DIAGNOSIS/ CURRENT STATUS(Main characteristics and possible effects on persons, the environment or operations of the risk

or factor. Record the gaps identified during audits and reviews.)- Pending compliance of obligations regarding forced investment (1%).- The legislation regarding these obligations is not clear.- Estimated cost of US $ 809K for best scenario, and US $ 70 Million at worst scenario- The community and the local authorities in Aguazul and Tauramena municipalities are

very interested in these investments be met as soon as possible.

- There are no overdue obligations.

Potentiality:- Low risk of lawsuit or investigation by State control agencies.- Medium risk of negative effects on company reputation due to complaints from NGOs.- High risk of legislation clarification with worst scenario as highly possible.

Areas at Risk:- The companys reputation- Economical impact onUS $ 70 Million, at worst scenario


2.1. Existing Law 99, 1993, paragraph from article No. 43. BP Instructions for compliance with the 1% obligation, based on consultation with an

External Expert.

2.2 Required Confirmation by Ministry of Environment about interpretation of the forced investmen

of 1% provision. Authorisation from Ministry of Environment for 1% forced investment proposed action

implementation.

3. MITIGATING/CONTROL MEASURES

3.1 Existing- Compliance Plans and Actions for 1% forced investment submission, acco rding to

Environmental Licenses requirements.3.2 Required

- Strategy Implementation for compliance of the 1% forced investment suggested bythe External Expert (comply without waiting for approval from the Ministry priorwritten notice from BP).

- Elaboration of 1% investments report.- Guarantee budget availability for complete Compliance Plan for next four years (2002-

2005).

4. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS4.1 On Result

- Reduction of 70% economical risk, based on worst scenario, for 3Q, 2002.