2001 SUMMER EXPL PROG SYINE TP & SANTOY LK AREA€¦ · Pt and Pd. Nine samples were collected from various outcrops of the mafic intrusive at several locations. This ... 7 2.2-3

CAMECO GOLD INC.2001 SUMMER EXPLORATION PROGRAM

EMPRESS PROJECTSYINE TOWNSHIP AND SANTOY LAKE AREA

NORTHWESTERN ONTARIONTS42D/15

2.22520

November, 2001Mike Koziol, P. Eng. District Geologist

RECEIVED/:Jfy"i

Nof23200J

42D15NW2006 2.2252 SANTOY LAKE 010

SUMMARY

The Empress project is located approximately 100 kilometres west of Hemlo, and 15 kilometres northeast of Terrace Bay, in Syine township and Santoy Lake area, northwestern Ontario. A four man-day prospecting program, carried out on May 15 and 16, 2001, located the airborne electromagnetic anomaly detected under the "Operation Treasure Hunt" program. The sources of the anomaly is a narrow (l- 3m) sulphide-rich argillite sandwiched between massive mafic flows. No visible hydrothermal alteration was recognized in association with the argillite or the surrounding mafic flows. A sample of the sulphide mineralization returned values at the detection limits for Au, Pt and Pd.

Nine samples were collected from various outcrops of the mafic intrusive at several locations. This rock, at all sample locations appears unaltered, relatively uniform in texture and lacking significant heterogeneity such as coarse pegmatoidal phases; a desirable texture in Lac des Iles type PGE deposits. Assay results returned values for Au, Pt, and Pd at or below detection levels.

Based on the disappointing results obtained from this program and the lack of encouragement reported by McCracken (2000), no further work is recommended for the north end of the Empress property.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUMMARY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii.

1.0 INTRODUCTION1.1 Description and Purpose of the 2001 Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ll .2 Location and Access . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l1.3 Physiography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ll .4 Property and Tenure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31.5 Previous Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

2.0 GEOLOGY2. l Regional Geology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32.2 Property Geology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

2.2-1 Mafic Metavolcanic Rocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52.2-2 Argillite . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72.2-3 Mafic to Intermediate Intrusive Rocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

3.0 GEOCHEMISTRY3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83.2 Analytical Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83.3 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

4.0 CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

6.0 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

CERTIFICATION OF QUALIFICATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

LIST OF TABLESTable l: Claims upon which work was carried out in 2001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

LIST OF FIGURESFigure l: Location Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2Figure 2: Claim Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4Figure 3: Geological Setting of the Empress Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

LIST OF MAPSMap 1: 2001 Sample Locations and Previously Cut Grids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Back Pocket

LIST OF APPENDICESAPPENDIX I: 2001 Sample Locations and Descriptions and Assay Certificates

42D15NW2006 2.2252 SANTOY LAKE 0 10C

CAMECO GOLD INC.2001 SUMMER EXPLORATION PROGRAM

EMPRESS PROJECTSYINE TOWNSHIP AND SANTOY LAKE AREA

NORTHWESTERN ONTARIONTS42D/15

LO INTRODUCTION

1.1 Description and Purpose of the 2001 Program

The 2001 field program consisted of a two day visit to the property on May 15 and 16 by Mike Koziol (District Geologist) and Dominic Babin (Geologist). The purpose of the visit was to (1) prospect the north end of the property for the source of an electromagnetic anomaly detected during the Operation Treasure Hunt helicopter survey, the data for which was released in 2000, and (2) prospect and sample the mafic and intermediate intrusive in the centre of the property and analyse the samples for Pt, Pd, and Au.

1.2 Location and Access

The Empress project is located approximately 100 km west of Hemlo and 15 km east of Terrace Bay, north of Jackfish Lake, near the north shore of Lake Superior (please see Figure 1). The property lies mostly in Syine Township, but extends within the Terrace Bay Municipal District to the southwest, and into the Santoy Lake area to the north. It is covered by NTS sheets 42D/15, and is centered about UTM coordinates 502000E and 5412500N (Zone 16U, NAD 27).

The south part of the property is transected by Trans-Canada Hwy 17, and is easily accessed via old logging and mining roads, which are now mostly reduced to ATV trails. Cameco Gold Inc (CGI) cut additional ATV trails during the CGI 1999 and 2000 exploration programs, and now some, although still rough and difficult, access is available to the northern part of the property.

1.3 Physiography

Topographic relief on Empress is fairly accentuated, with elevations ranging from 240 m to over 470 m above mean sea level. Steep hills and ridges are commonly flanked by rock cliffs and deep ravines, often occupied by beaver ponds and swamps. The ridge line between McCraig and Cliff lakes dictates the drainage pattern on the property. The southern portion of the property drains in a south/southwesterly direction, while the northern portion of the property drains northwest until it reaches the Aguasabon river basin and flows south. Airphotos, topographic maps, and LandSAT images indicate that most lakes and streams are preferentially emplaced along a regional system of cross-faults and joints which are oriented north-south and northwesterly. The elongated aspect of Christie Lake and its associated string of smaller water bodies is a good example of this ( Map 1).

Vegetation is moderate, dominated by spruce, white birch, balsam fir, and little trembling aspen. Undergrowth is moderate to fairly thick, and consists of mountain maple and young conifers. Low- lying areas in the southwest portion of the property, from the foot of Empress Hill and east towards

Cameco Gold Inc. Empress Project 2001 Summer Exploration Program

ONTARIO QUEBEC

EMPRESSLake

Nipigon\ N.oranda .Val-d'Or~.Timmins,'' v

T ' " x Chapleau /' ~ K^kland Lafc*i

f ]Sultan v) Industrial

Thunder Bay

Sudbury

Lake.Michigan

CamecoO 100 200 300 400 500km

Christie Lake were clear-cut by logging operations, and are now occupied by sparse white birch, young balsam fir, and moose maple. The northeast claim/grid area was subjected to a forest fire in the past. Most of the standing trees are burnt and dead. There is abundant windfall and the undergrowth is typically raspberry canes and ferns.

There is abundant outcrop, especially at the northern end of the property, but exposure is commonly masked by the undergrowth and by a cover of moss and detrital material.

1.4 Property and Tenure

The property consists of 16 contiguous unpatented mining claims and one additional non-contiguous claim (1207882 - 4 units), for a total of 86 units covering 1376 ha (Figure 2). The claims lie within the Terrace Bay and Geraldton M.N.R. administrative districts and the Thunder Bay Mining Division. The property is shown on claim maps G634 (Syine Twp) and G612 (Santoy Lake area).

Cameco Corporation is working towards earning a I 0007o interest on 16 of the mining claims from prospectors George R. Daniels, Jon D. Ferguson, and Audrey Ferguson. An additional claim comprising 16 units (claim 1217345) is contiguous to the optioned block of claims, and is owned by Cameco Corp. Table l lists the claims upon which work was carried out in 2001.

Table l: Claims upon which work was carried out in 2001

Claim # Area (ha) Township

1207879 64 Syine1207880 192 Syine1208187 64 Syine1217345 256 Santoy Lake

1.5 Previous Work

A detailed description of previous work on the project and surrounding area was provided by McCracken (2000) and Samson (1999).

2.0 GEOLOGY

2.1 Regional Geology

The Archean rocks of the Schreiber-Hemlo greenstone belt of the Wawa Subprovince extend along the north shore of Lake Superior, from Schreiber in the west to White River in the east (Jackson et al, 1998). The belt is separated in two arms by the Trans-Superior Tectonic Zone, a north-trending structural feature along which the Killala Lake and the Coldwell Alkaline Complexes were emplaced (Middle Proterozoic -1.0-1.2 Ga, Sage and Watkinson 1995). The Empress property lies within the Schreiber portion of the greenstone belt. It is comprised of tholeiitic and calc-alkalic mafic to felsic flows, interlayered with coarse to fine fragmental volcanic and minor sedimentary rocks. In the


-—y————

ft) 1208190

CLAIM MAPCamecoO 500 1000m

i i i i i i i i i

Geo. Ret.: NAD 27 - UTM Zone 16

Jackfish Bay area, these rocks are folded into a series of close isoclinal folds with subhorizontal to gently plunging east to east-southeasterly oriented fold axes (Walker 1967, Carter 1988). Large and small sill-like intrusions of gabbro, peridotite and minor quartz-feldspar porphyries have intruded the supracrustal sequences. The supracrustal and associated intrusive rocks are bounded to the northeast by the Black-Pic batholith, to the north by rocks of the Quetico Metasedimentary Subprovince, to the west by the Grossman batholith and to the south by the Terrace Bay pluton.

Metamorphic grade is generally upper greenschist but increases to upper amphibolite proximal to the granitoid plutons.

Late north to northeast-trending Proterozoic diabase dikes of the Marathon swarm were emplaced around 2.17 Ga and intrude all the rock types in the area (Osmani 1991).

2.2 Property Geology

The Empress property was never completely mapped in detail, and the best regional reference remains the map produced by J.W.R. Walker in 1967 (l inch ^ 1/2 mile), Flis map indicates that the property is predominantly underlain by mafic and intermediate volcanic rocks and their derived schists (Figure 3). These supracrustal rocks are intruded by intermediate to felsic hypabyssal intrusions and gabbroic sill-like bodies. Within the south portion of the property, these rocks are intruded by the late Archean composite Terrace Bay pluton (granodiorite, granite, monzonite to syenite). The Empress Mine and the Empress property are located within contact alteration zones associated, in part or in whole, with hydrous emanations from the Terrace Bay pluton. Just north of the property is the Cairagom/Owl Dome (granite/granodiorite gneiss). Like the Empress mine to the south, the Ursa Major is located within the contact metamorphic aureole for the Cairngom/Owl dome.

The south part of the property was the focus of the 1999 exploration program by CGI (Samson, 1999). This area was previously mapped by David R. Bell Geological Services (for Micham Exploration Inc.) in 1983 and 1984, and the current east-grid of the property was also mapped by SDA Geological Services LTD. (for Landis Mining Corp.) in 1997. CGI revisited portions of the east-grid, concentrating its efforts on the Empress Structure and also mapped all of the west-grid.

Mapping during the 2000 summer exploration program was concentrated primarily on the northern half of the property (McCracken, 2000). Previously, this area has been unmapped except for a small portion around the Ursa Major occurrence by David R. Bell Geological Services on behalf of Micham Exploration Inc. in 1984. CGI mapped the north grid at a scale of 1:2500, while the regional traverses were mapped at l :5000. Descriptions of the major rock units observed on the property in 1999 and 2000 are provided by McCracken (2000) and Samson (1999) and only those units sampled in 2001 are described here. To maintain continuity, the rock descriptions used are the same as those used in previous mapping of the property by McCracken (2000) and Samson (1999).

2.2-1 Mafic Metavolcanic Rocks

Mafic volcanic rocks are the predominate volcanic rock type underlying the northern portion of the property (Figure 3). The rocks are fine-grained, weathered greenish-grey and are generally weakly chloritic and carbonatized. The unit consists of massive, nondescript flows with no observed


Legend

1 l Mafic Volcanics

2 l Intermediate Volcanics

3 l Iron Formations

Oi t i

500i i i i

1000l l l l

1500 2000 2500m i i i t i t i i i i i i

5 l Mafic/Intermediate Intrusive Rocks

6 l Granitic Rocks

101 Diabase

Scale 1:30000

Cameco

Empress ProjectGEOLOGICAL SETTING OF THE

EMPRESS PROPERTY(after Walker-1967)

Compiled: Todd McCracken Dwg. No.: EME00021Drafted: Clayten Ourbln Date: 00/08/23 Figure 3Scale: 1:30,000 Geo. Ref.: N AD 27 - UTM Zone 1NTSRef.: 42 0/14.15 Source:

primary textures to well preserved pillow flows. The north grid is underlain largely by the massive flows with only subordinate amounts of pillows observed. The flows display a weak gneissocity created from the presence of diffuse felsic bands. The area in the vicinity of the Ursa Major as well as the region north of McCraig Lake is underlain by relatively undeformed mafic pillow flows. The pillow flows indicate tops up to the south based on amygdales which is supported by Walkers mapping (Walker, 1967). The pillow shapes are destroyed in areas of shearing, such as in the creek flowing from Lizzard Lake to Duncan Lake.

2.2-2 Argillite

The argillite observed during the 2001 program is dark grey to black. It occurs as one to three metres wide units between two massive mafic flows. The argillite is very fine grained and it contains from 3 ô to locally 1007o pyrite as blebs and semi-continuous stringers and bands. These bands are parallel and sub-parallel to the foliation that strikes at 100 to 105 degrees, and dips 70 degrees south. The contacts with the mafic flows are sharp and there is no visible evidence of hydrothermal alteration in the argillite or the mafic flows near the contacts or further away. This argillite unit is interpreted as an interflow sediment that has not been subjected to alteration or fluid movement subsequent to deposition.

2.2-3 Mafic to Intermediate Intrusive Rocks

Mafic to intermediate intrusive rocks consist of gabbro, diorite, blue-quartz diorite and possible granodiorite as identified by McCracken (2000) during his reconnaissance mapping through the central un-gridded portion of the property. The intrusive rocks display little textural and compositional heterogeneity, therefore, the distinction between these subunits was very difficult, as contacts were not observed and changes in composition and textures appear to be gradational.

Gabbro intrusion weathered to a grey to greenish grey, are typically very massive, medium to coarse grained, and weakly foliated. Hornblende, and Na-feldspar were the dominate phenocrysts observed in the hand samples. Petrographic work from 1999 identified quartz and titanite as well (Samson, 1999). The best exposures of the gabbro were around the shores of Cross Lake and on the ATV trail between McCraig Lake and Pack Lake. No significant sulphides were observed within the gabbro unit.

Diorite to blue-quartz diorite units extend from the top end of the south grid north ward to McCraig Lake. The rocks are weathered grey to white-grey, and display a distinct pinkish-orange colour on the surface of joints. They vary from massive and non-foliated to weakly foliated. Diorite is the more commonly observed subunit, the blue-quartz diorite is commonly found at the west end of the south grid and north of Christie Lake. The blue quartz "eyes" are opaline and Walker feels this unit is the transition between diorite and granophyre (Walker, 1967).


3.0 GEOCHEMISTRY

3.1 Introduction

A total often samples were collected during the two day field visit. Descriptions for these and assay certificates are included in Appendix I. Sample locations are plotted on Map l.

3.2 Analytical Procedure

The samples were delivered to Bondar-Clegg of Timmins, Ontario for preparation which included crushing to -10 mesh, splitting to 250 g sample, and pulverized the split to -150 mesh. The sample pulps were then shipped to the Bondar-Clegg analytical facility in Val d'Or, Quebec. Gold, platinum and palladium assays were completed using Fire Assay-DCP methods. In addition the samples were analysed for 38 elements using ICP.

3.3 Results

All grab samples collected in 2001 returned less than encouraging results, not exceeding the detection limits for Au, Pt and Pd (see Map 1). No significant anomalies were detected for any of the base metals.

4.0 CONCLUSIONS

The four man-day prospecting program located the airborne electromagnetic anomaly detected under the "Operation Treasure Hunt" program. The sources of the anomaly is a narrow (l- 3m) sulphide- rich argillite sandwiched between massive mafic flows. No visible hydrothermal alteration was recognized in association with the argillite or the surrounding mafic flows. A sample of the sulphide mineralization returned values at the detection limits for Au, Pt and Pd.

Nine samples were collected from various outcrops of the mafic intrusive at several locations. The rocks, at all sample locations appear unaltered, relatively uniform in texture and lacking significant heterogeneity such as coarse pegmatoidal phases; a desirable texture in Lac des Iles type PGE deposits. Assay results returned values for Au, Pt, and Pd at or below detection levels.

5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the disappointing results obtained from this program and the lack of encouragement reported by McCracken (2000), no further work is recommended for the north end of the Empress property.


6.0 REFERENCES

Carter, M.W.1988: Geology of Schreiber-Terrace Bay area, District of Thunder Bay; Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 5692, 287p., 14 photos, 19 figures, 27 tables, l appendix, and 5 maps in back pocket.

Jackson, S.L., Beakhouse, G.P., and Davis, D.W.1998: Regional Geology Setting of the Hemlo Gold Deposit; intrim progress report; Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 5977.

McCracken, T..2000: Cameco Gold Inc., 2000 Summer Exploration Program, Empress Project, Syine Township and Santoy Lake Area, Northwestern Ontario, NTS 42D/15. Unpublished Company Report.

Osmani, LA.1991: Proterozoic mafic dike swarms in the Superior Province of Ontario; in Geology of Ontario, Ontario Geological Survey, Special Volume 4, Part l, p.661-681.

Sage, R.P. and Watkinson, D.H.1995: Alkalic rocks of the midcontinent rift; in Proceedings Volume 41, part 2a, 41 st Annual Meeting, Institute of Lake Superior Geology, 75p.

Samson, J.1999: Cameco Gold Inc. 1999 Exploration Program Empress Project, Syine Township and Santoy Lake Area, Northwestern Ontario, NTS-42D/15. Unpublished Company Report.

Walker, I.R.1967: Geology of the Jackfish-Middleton Area, District of Thunder Bay; Ontario Department of Mines, Geological Report Number 50,41p. Accompanied by Maps Numbers 2107, 2112, both at a scale of l inch to 1/2 mile.


10

CERTIFICATES OF QUALIFICATIONS

I, Marian (Mike) Koziol, residing at 137 Cranbrook Crescent, Ontario, P3E 2N4, do here by certify that:

I am currently employed by Cameco Gold Inc. of 1349 Kelly Lake Road, Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 5P5;

I attended McGill University at Montreal, Quebec and earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Geological Sciences in 1978;

I have been continuously employed in my profession since graduation.

I am a member in good standing with the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Saskatchewan and the Association of Professional Engineers of Ontario.

I have been directly involved in field work and a supervisory role with this project since inception in 1998.

Signed in Sudbury, Ontario, this 16th day of November, 2001

M. Kozol District Geologist Eastern Canada District


APPENDIX I

2001 Sample Locations and Descriptions and Assay Certificates


Empress Project - 2001 Sample Locations and Descriptions

NAD27 Zone 16U

Easting

501597

502013

502127

502063

502157

502132

502047

502217

502191

502202

Northing

5415360

5415150

5414133

5412473

5412676

5412655

5412597

5413578

5413097

5412830

Sample #

01-01

01-002

01-003

01-004

01-005

01-006

01-007

01-100

01-101

01-102

Rock Type

argillite

massive basalt

diorite

diorite

blue quartz-eye diorite

gabbro

diorite




Auppb

3

1

si

^

*:l

2

^

1

si

1

Ptppb

^

^

^

^

^

7

^

^

^

^

Pdppb

^

<l

<l

^

<l

4

<l

<l

*:l

<l


CHIIVIITEC: BONDAR CLEGG

Rapport Lab Geochimie Geochemical Lab Report

4-

+

+

U

+

Chimitec - Bondar Clegg, 1 322-B Harricana, Val-d'Or, Qufbec, J9P 3X6, Tel: (819) 825-0178, Fax: (819) 825-0256

CHIIVIITEC BOIMDAR CLEGG

Rapport Lab Geochimie Geochemical Lab Report

REPORT: T01-57117.0 ( COMPLETE )

CLIENT: CAHECO GOLD INC.

PROJECT: EMPRESS

REFERENCE:

SUBMITTED BY: M. KOZIOL DATE RECEIVED: 23-MAY-01 DATE PRINTED: 5-JUI-01

\ DATE NUMBER OF j APPROVED ELEMENT ANALYSES

]- 010531 1 Au Gold - Fire Assay 11 : 010531 2 Pt Platinum 11: 010531 3 Pd^ 010531 4 Agi 010531 5 Cui 010531 6 Pb

i 010531 7 Zn: 010531 8 Moi 010531 9 Nii 010531 10 Coi 010531 11 Cd: 010531 12 Bi

: 010531 13 Asi 010531 14 Sb: 010531 15 Fei 010531 16 Mn i 010531 17 Tel 010531 18 Ba

: 010531 19 Cr; 010531 20 Vi 010531 21 Sni 010531 22 Ui 010531 23 Laj 010531 24 Al

; 010531 25 Mgi 010531 26 Cai 010531 27 Nai 010531 28 K: 010531 29 Sri 010531 30 Y

i 010531 31 Gai 010531 32 Lii 010531 33 Nbi 010531 34 Sei 010531 35 Tai 010531 36 Ti

PalladiumAg -Cu -Pb -

Zn -Mo -Ni -Co -Cd -Bi -

As -Sb -Fe -Mn - Te -Ba -

Cr -V -Sn -U -La -Al -

Mg -Ca -Na -K -Sr -Y -

Ga -Li -Nb -Se -Ta -Ti -

I C01IC01IC01

I C01IC01I C01IC01IC01IC01

IC01IC01IC01IC01 IC01IC01

IC01IC01IC01

IC01IC01I C01

I C01IC01IC01

IC01IC01

IC01

IC01IC01IC01IC01IC01IC01

11111111

111111111111

11111111 1111

111111111111

111111111111111111111111

LOWER DETECTION

1 PPB 5 PPB1

0.212

1111

0.25

55

0.011

101

11

20201

0.01

0.010.010.010.01

11

211510

0.010

PPBPPMPPMPPM

PPMPPMPPMPPMPPMPPM

PPMPPMPCTPPM PPMPPM

PPMPPMPPMPPMPPMPCT

PCTPCTPCTPCTPPMPPM

PPMPPMPPMPPMPPMPCT

EXTRACTION

FIRE ASSAY FIRE ASSAYFIRE ASSAYHCLHCLHCL

HCLHCLHCLHCLHCLHCL

HCLHCLHCLHCL HCLHCL

HCLHCLHCLHCLHCLHCL

HCLHCLHCLHCLHCLHCL

HCLHCLHCLHCLHCLHCL

:HN03:HN03:HN03

:HN03:HN03:HN03:HN03:HN03:HN03

:HN03:HN03:HN03:HN03 :HN03:HN03




(3:1)(3:1)(3:1)

(3:1)(3:1)(3:1)(3:1)(3:1)(3:1)

(3:1)(3:1)(3:1)(3:1) (3:1)(3:1)

(3:1)(3:1)(3:1)(3:1)(3:1)(3:1)

(3:1)(3:1)(3:1)(3:1)(3:1)(3:1)

(3:1)(3:1)(3:1)(3:1)(3:1)(3:1)

DATE NUMBER OF LOWER METHOD APPROVED ELEMENT ANALYSES DETECTION EXTRACTION METHOD

FIRE ASSAY-DCP l 010531 37 Zr Zr - IC01 11 1 PPM HCL:HN03 (3:1) INDUC. COUP. PLASM FIRE ASSAY-DCP i 010531 38 S S - IC01 11 0.01 PCT HCL:HN03 (3:1) INDUC. COUP. PLASMFIRE ASSAY-DCP ;INDUC.INDUC.INDUC.

INDUC.INDUC.INDUC.INDUC.INDUC.INDUC.

INDUC.INDUC.INDUC.INDUC. INDUC.INDUC.




COUP.COUP.COUP.

COUP.COUP.COUP.COUP.COUP.COUP.

COUP.COUP.COUP.COUP. COUP.COUP.




PLASMAPLASMA SAMPLE TYPES NUMBER SIZE FRACTIONS NUMBER SAMPLE PREPARATIONS NUMBER

; ROCK 11 -150 11 CRUSH, SPLIT 11PLASMA PULVERIZATION 11PLASMAPLASMA ;PLASMA REPORT COPIES TO: MIKE KOZIOL INVOICE TO: MIKE KOZIOLPLASMA

: This report must not be reproduced except in full. The data presented in thisPLASMA report is specific to those sanples identified under "Sample Nuifcer" and isPLASMA applicable only to the samples as received expressed on a dry basis unless iPLASMA otherwise indicatedPLASMA *********IHtlHri^*************A**************lt*t****i)***tl)*tt*)i*******************

PLASMAPLASMA l

PLASMAPLASMAPLASMAPLASMAPLASMAPLASMA ;

PLASMAPLASMAPLASMAPLASMAPLASMAPLASMA i

PLASMAPLASMAPLASMAPLASMAPLASMA ;PLASMA :

Chimitec - Bondar Clegg, 1322-B Harricana, Val-d'Or, Quebec, J9P 3X6, Tel: (819) 825-0178, Fax: (819) 825-0256

4CHIIVUTEC BOIMDAR CLEGG

Rapport Lab Geochimie Geochemical.. Lab Report

CLIENT: CAMECO GOLD INC. REPORT: T01-57117.0 ( COMPLETE ) DATE RECEIVED: 23-MAY-01 DATE PRINTED: 5-JUI-01

PROJECT: EMPRESS PAGE 1 OF 1

SAMPLE ELEMENT Au ;PtV: Pd Agj Cu Pb Zn MoNUMBER UNITS PPB PPB PPB PPM PPM PPM: PPM PPM

EMPEMPEMPEMPEMP

EMPEMPEMPEMPEMP

01-00101-00201-00301-00401-005

01-00601-00701-10001-10101-102

31

•O•el•O

2•d

1•ci

1

;*5V;x5x5"5•5

7*5

••iis^5

x5

< 1 0.4 55<1 *;Z/ 5

•O x. 2 2*1 *-2 21"1 *-2 19

4 x. 2 222tl x.2 6*1 *-2 57*1 *,2 36*1 0,2 80

5 ice : :;x2 72*2 52*2 45

2 64

x2 89x2 44*2 57

•x?.. 27

x2 103

•S?v2.;

i22

V312

Ai;

NiPPM

51878

17

3020174138

CoPPM:;

18••22,;'14

1113

2916172738

cd siPPM PPX

xx<<

0

0x

0x

0

.2

.2

.2

.2

.3

.3

.2

.4

.2•2

;:x|^-5*5•^

S'.•tS;xs:;;*5.:.:^;

As Sb Fe Mn Te 88:; Cr V Sn M La PPM PPM PCT PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PCT

Mg : ; : ; ; : Ca;,. Na s^KS Sr '̂ Ga At.i, Nb ;: Sp/ Ta ;;.:.;:Ti : .V Zr - S: PCT PCT PCT PCT PPM PPM PPM Pi*l PPM PPM PPM PCT PPM PCT

x5 7.24 502x10 22 176 27x20 *20 3 0.8? 0.67 0.09 0.03 0,07 4 3x5 5.78 899xlO 7 61 149x20 ^0 5 1.91 1.39 2,64 0.12 0,04 42 11x5 4.76 707x10 11 57 140x20 ^0 7 1.82 1.33 2.73 0.17 0,04 43 14^3.98 335x10 84 100 8 ^0 ^0 25 2.62 1.01 1.11 0.14 0.57 20 25••5 4.95 699 "10 44 101 31x20 ^0 17 3.12 2.03 1.07 0.08 0.36 12 19

x5 7.57 403^10 19 42 371 X20 ^0 10 2.27 0.69 1,58 0.30 0,16 38 18X5 4.92 349x10 194 89 36 ^0 -c20 17 2.37:1.16 0.94 0.07 i;p9 21 19x5 4.39 418X10 126 95 43x20 ^20 20 2.11 1.29 1.03 0.09 0,63 14 19x5 6.40 485 xlO 6 60 176x20 ^0 x5 7.75 783 x10 52 46 158x20 ^0

3 2.67 2.19 1V76 0.09 0.03 46 3 3.tt 2.66 2,50 0.07 OM 23

4656

666

e2

6

129

2121

: : :7A18

H1018

1011•e!

2

281

11411

X5 xlO .092 14 1.559 x10 .185 16 0.02

12x10 .195 10 0.01"S x10 .166 30 0.15^X10 .220 23 0.14

6x10 ,360 21 0.196x10 ,222 190.038x10 .145^ 16 0.189|;: : x10 .42? 3 0.09

10 xlO ,28i 5 0.07

DONA -1 64 60 4 156 2 19 10 0.3 x5 ^ -cS 2.73 174 <10 3 248 5x20 ^0 <1 0;29 0.29 2.92X.01 5.61 10 xl x10 <1 1.35

Chimitec - Bondar Clegg, 1322-B Harricana, Val-d'Or, Quebec, J9P 3X6, Tel: (819) 825-0178, Fax: (819) 825-0256

ONTARIO MINISTRY OF NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT AND MINES

Work Report Summary

Transaction No: W0140.31184 Status: APPROVED

Recording Date: 2001-NOV-23 Work Done from: 2001 -MAY-1 5

Approval Date: 2001-DEC-17 to: 2001-MAY-16

Client(s):

1 14820 CAMECO CORPORATION/CORPORATION CAMECO

124014 DANIELS, GEORGE RAY

131386 FERGUSON, AUDREY

131447 FERGUSON, JON DUDLEY

Survey Type(s):

ASSAY

Work Report Details: Perform Applied

Claim* Perform Approve Applied Approve

TB 1207879 S199 S199 SO SO

TB 1207880 S796 S796 SO SO

TB 1208187 S796 S796 SO SO

TB 1217345 S199 S199 S92 S92

S1,990 S1,990 S92 S92

Assign Reserve Assign Approve Reserve Approve Due Date

SO 0 S 199 S 199 2004- JAN-27

SO 0 S796 S796 2004-JAN-27

SO 0 S796 S796 2004-FEB-13

SO 0 S107 S107 2002-FEB-19

SO SO S1,898 S1,898

Status of claim is based on information currently on record.

42D15NW2006 2.2252 SANTOY LAKE 900

2001-Dec-21 02:59 Armstrong-d Page 1 of 1

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Date:2001-DEC-17

Ministers du Developpement du Nord et des Mines Ontario

GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT OFFICE 933 RAMSEY LAKE ROAD, 6th FLOOR SUDBURY, ONTARIO P3E6B5

GEORGE RAY DANIELS45 EAST GROVE CRESCENTBOX 526TERRACE BAY, ONTARIOPOT 2WO CANADA

Tel: (888) 415-9845 Fax:(877)670-1555

Dear Sir or Madam

Submission Number: 2 .22520 Transaction Number(s): W0140 31184

Subject: Approval of Assessment Work

We have approved your Assessment Work Submission with the above noted Transaction Number(s). The attached Work Report Summary indicates the results of the approval.

At the discretion of the Ministry, the assessment work performed on the mining lands noted in this work report may be subject to inspection and/or investigation at any time.

If you have any question regarding this correspondence, please contact LUCILLE JEROME by email at [email protected] or by phone at (705) 670-5858.

Yours Sincerely,

Ron GashinskiSupervisor, Geoscience Assessment Office

Gc: Resident Geologist

Cameco Corporation/Corporation Cameco (Claim Holder)George Ray Daniels (Assessment Office)Jon Dudley Ferguson (Claim Holder)

Assessment File Library

George Ray Daniels (Claim Holder)Audrey Ferguson (Claim Holder)Marian (Mike) Koziol (Agent)

Visit our website at http://www.gov.on.ca/MNDM/LANDS/mlsmnpge.htm Page: 1 Correspondence 10:16667

MINISTRY DfHOUTHf HU ntVtl OPUFNT

PHOVINCUil MHIHn Rf C OS DI R SO* FlCf

MINING LAND TENURE

MAP

o o rsi

j

o

oft

GIS DOH 4M OKC I/WDE flÔfiX

5 ^^./f -^FDate /Time of Issue Nov 1 2001

TOWNSHIP r AREA

SANTOY LAKE AREA

13:27h Eastern

PLAN

G-0612

ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICTS f DIVISIONSMining Division Thunder BayLand Titles/Registry Division THUNDER BAY

Ministry of Natural Resources District NIPIGON,.' --. - i Alx

Ss^-i.-j l \

LAND T ENURE WITHDRAWALS

LAND TENURE WITHDRAWAL DESCRIPTIONS

Hint SEC 33 W4.L-C22iri9tU'U MKT 1? Vf W .5

n*f( bMn (HHlqlM 41 *CDM nnlan RBHTV*. ED

hminrivy *s rt raw ft Hiy

IMPORTANT NOTICESAr*M u

i *aiW|

General Information and LimitationsCiiineMinMjîa .tem*.-, Aia not paar

web) NlaMe RKcnlur o

n bc*l-iils rites nr Riglit™ Cillhar rE^rk? at prnlk^Mfm enhyln

•BSMJfEt: 1*1* nfalnmonQiitvln irurt) l^rri TBHIrH Sautaf PtdvlhÂI MI1I1U âcnll

1207880Davidson

120787,8

5413000N

1208187

1208188

459/728

: 21,0334208719

Empress Project

2001SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND PREVIOUSLY CUT GRIDS

Sample Location (prefixed by BMP)Au.Pt Pd

CamecoAirborne EM AnomalySiemens

2—5 SiemensDwg.No.: E MEOIOOI

O 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000m Drafted: c icyton DurbGeo. Ref.: N AD 27 - UTM Zone 16

NTSRftf.: 42 c/-4,1

Documents

2001 SUMMER EXPL PROG SYINE TP & SANTOY LK AREA€¦ · Pt and Pd. Nine samples were collected from various outcrops of the mafic intrusive at several locations. This ... 7 2.2-3