Upload
rjn-group-inc
View
26
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
This is the first portion of the Flow Monitoring & GIS session. It focuses on Flow Monitoring Data Analysis. Presenter - Thomas Romza, E.I.
Citation preview
Flow Monitoring Data Analysis
Prepared By Thomas Romza E.I.
Overview • Data Management
– Calibration – Editing
• Flow Analysis – Dry-weather – Wet-weather – Conclusions
• Model Inputs
Data Management
• Goal: Accurate Flow Data
• Bad Raw + Bad Cals = Bad Data • Bad Raw + Good Cals = OK Data • Good Raw + Good Cals = GREAT Data
Raw Data Calibrations
Final Processed
Data
Installation, Calibration, Operation, and Maintenance
• Calibration Is Important to Ensure Meter Reads Accurately – Flow is calculated from the meter
readings of depth (converted into flow area) and velocity
– If meter isn’t accurate in either parameter the flow can be falsely high or low
• Flow Meters Are “AV” (Area-Velocity) Meters – Q = Flow = A x V
D
A V
Q
Data Management
D
Data Management
• Raw Data - Depth – Inaccuracies in the meter – Drifting readings
Flow
Velocity
Ultra
Pressure
Data Management
• Depth Importance – 10” pipe @ 2 fps
Q = 0.14 mgd Q = 0.18 mgd
.5” depth difference
≈ 25% FLOW DIFFERENCE
D = 2.5 in A = 15.4 in2
D = 3 in A = 19.8 in2
Data Management
• Raw Data - Velocity – Peak Velocity vs. Average Velocity
2.0
1.6
1.4
1.2
1.0
Peak = 2.0 Average = 1.7 Factor = 0.85
Peak = 1.2 Average = 1.1 Factor = 0.86
1.8
Data Management
• Velocity Importance – 10” pipe @ 3 in depth
V = 1.5 fps V = 1.8 fps
Q = 0.13 mgd
A = 19.8 in2 .3 fps velocity difference
≈ 20% FLOW DIFFERENCE
Q = 0.16 mgd
A = 19.8 in2
Data Management
~At least 4-5 throughout the duration of the metering period!
Multi-point Profile
Depth Velocity Profile
Data Management
Depth Correction (+0.5”)
Field Offset (-0.5”)
Raw
Final
Data Management
Raw
Data Management
Peak Flow (unadjusted)
Peak Flow (adjusted)
1.5 MGD – 30% Reduction of Project Scale
Installation, Calibration, Operation, and Maintenance
• WHY??? – Raw Meter Data
Inaccurate Flow Inaccurate DW Baseline Inaccurate WW Results Inaccurate Model Inputs Inaccurate RECOMMENDATIONS
Inaccurate Flow – Detrimental to post rehab monitoring
Data Management
Flow Analysis • Trying to Find Correlation Between Rain and Flow • Dry-Weather Flow Analysis (DWF)
– Important to have a span of days without rain so that the water table settles
– Baseline Flow
for the rest of analysis
– Diurnal Curves
Flow Analysis – Diurnal Curve
Diurnal Low Flow “Trough” Flow ~ 0.8 mgd
Average Dry Weather Flow ~ 1.4 mgd
Diurnal Peak Flow ~ 1.8 mgd
Flow Analysis - DWF • Diurnal Variations Can Yield Conclusions about the System
– Low diurnal peaking factor (1.8 Peak to 1.4 Ave ~ 1.3 PF) – High trough to ADWF percentage (.8 trough to 1.4 Ave ~ 57%)
Manhole Joints
Pipe Seals Mainline
Joints
Break-in Taps
Lateral Joints
Manhole Cracks
Mainline Cracks
Lateral Cracks
Discrete ADWF
Estimated Population
Average Flow (Typical 70 gal)
(mgd) (census (gal/capita/day)WHL-01 0.299 3900 77 Residential
WHL-02 + 02A 0.170 2587 66 ResidentialWHL-03 0.173 1120 155 50% BusinessesWHL-04 0.438 3332 131 50% BusinessWHL-05 0.255 2472 103 Middle SchoolWHL-06 0.190 1013 188 25% BusinessWHL-07 0.245 2380 103 40% BusinessWHL-08 0.073 256 287 75% BusinessWHL-09 0.244 3414 72 ResidentialWHL-10 0.316 4852 65 Residential
WHL-10A 3.183 N/A N/A N/AWHL-11 0.697 3814 183 High School
WHL-11A** 0.003 0 N/A Overflow MeterWHL-12 0.467 239 1956 100% BusinessWHL-13 0.065 2671 24 Multi Family UnitsWHL-14 0.134 2978 45 ResidentialWHL-15 0.239 1249 191 67% BusinessWHL-16 0.184 118 1560 100% Airport/BusinessWHL-17 0.190 1090 175 75% Business
Basin Basin Characteristics
Flow Analysis - DWF
• Population Equivalent – Census Data – Generally about 70
gal/capita/day – High flow/capita
means: • Non-residential area • OR high ground water
infiltration
Flow Analysis - DWF
• Unique Situations – Flow Diversions – Lift Stations – Snow Melt – Swimming Pools Draining – Sporting Events – Holidays – Black Friday @ Woodfield
Installation, Calibration, Operation, and Maintenance
• WHY??? – Raw Meter Data – Accurate Flow
Inaccurate DW Baseline Inaccurate WW Results Inaccurate Model Inputs Inaccurate RECOMMENDATIONS
Inaccurate Baseline – Dampen or exaggerate peaking factors from wet-weather flow
DWF Analysis
Flow Analysis - Rain
• Rain Data Analysis
Flow Analysis - Rain • Rain Data Weighting
– Inverse Squared Distance method
– Apportion rain to basins according to distance from rain gauge to basin centroid
43% RG-01 57% RG-02
12% RG-01 88% RG-02
82% RG-01 18% RG-02
88% RG-01 12% RG-02
Flow Analysis - WWF
• Wet-Weather Analysis – Rain Derived Infiltration and Inflow (RDII)
Flow Analysis - WWF
• Wet-Weather Analysis – Excess Flow vs. Rain
• Predict for larger rain events
– Peaking Factors • Excess Flow vs.
DWF • Predict for larger
rain events
Observed PF of ~ 3.0
Flow Analysis - WWF • Downstream Control and Capacity Issues
– Hydrographs • Increase in depth and decrease in velocity • Constant/decreasing flow
Downstream Control
Max Flow of ~2.75 MGD
Flow Analysis - WWF • Downstream Control and Capacity Issues
– Scattergraphs • Mannings Curve • Iso-Q lines`
Manning’s Curve
ISO-Q Lines
Installation, Calibration, Operation, and Maintenance
• WHY??? – Raw Meter Data – Accurate Flow – Accurate DW Baseline
Inaccurate WW Results Inaccurate Model Inputs Inaccurate RECOMMENDATIONS
Inaccurate WW Results – Incorrect priority basins and quantification. Focus on the wrong areas.
WWF Analysis
Flow Analysis – Model Inputs/RTK Analysis • RTK Method Is an Empirical Way to Duplicate Collected
Flow Data with Inputs and Constants • Model Input
What Is RTK? • Not an Acronym • Unit Hydrograph (UH) method to represent the
relationship between rain and flow • Atomizes rainfall-derived infiltration and inflow (RDII)
response into UH described by R, T, and K • Reconstitutes UH into model by applying a rainfall
distribution to UH
What Is RTK? • R = Percent Rainfall
Capture
• T = Time to Peak
• K = Receding Limb Multiplier
R-Component
T-Component K-Component
(K × T)
RTK Unit Hydrographs
• 3 Components of RDII: – Fast (1) – Medium (2) – Slow (3)
RTK Analysis
RTK Analysis Applied to a Rainfall Distribution
RTK Analysis Application
Over-prediction due to DS control
Installation, Calibration, Operation, and Maintenance
• WHY??? – Raw Meter Data – Accurate Flow – Accurate DW Baseline – Accurate WW Results
Inaccurate Model Inputs Inaccurate RECOMMENDATIONS
Inaccurate RTK Storage Calculation Wet-weather extremes in the model
Model Inputs and RTK Analysis
• Data Handling – Accurate flow data from depth
and Velocity
• DWF Analysis – Baseline Flow – ADWF factors – Trough % and
Diurnal Peak
• WWF Analysis – Correlations between rain and
excess flow – Peaking Factors – Infiltration vs. Inflow – Downstream Control and
capacity issues
• RTK Parameters
Flow Analysis Summary
Flow Analysis Results
• Recommendations – DWF - Is there need for base flow reduction?
• High Infiltration? – Diurnal PF and Trough % – High flow per capita
– WWF – Is there need for capacity improvements, storage, or I/I reduction? • Basin Peaking Factors • Capacity of sewers
– Downstream Control
• Model Inputs – DWF
• ADWF and Diurnal Variation – WWF
• Basin Size and RTK Parameters
Installation, Calibration, Operation, and Maintenance
• WHY??? – Raw Meter Data – Accurate Flow – Accurate Baseline – Accurate Results – Accurate Model Inputs
ACCURATE Recommendations
FLOW DATA MANAGEMENT & ANALYSIS
Questions?