16
1 To be submitted in June 2019 2 Existing evaluation (published or in draft); Self-evaluations reports by partners and monitoring reports. 3 To be submitted in October 2019 4 The two studies are being conducted by two different organisations/teams. The evaluation team will be expected to draw upon the studies to inform the overall effectiveness evaluation.

2 Existing evaluation (published or in draft); Self-evaluations … · 2018-12-13 · 1 To be submitted in June 2019 2 Existing evaluation (published or in draft); Self-evaluations

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    6

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1 To be submitted in June 2019 2 Existing evaluation (published or in draft); Self-evaluations reports by partners and monitoring reports. 3 To be submitted in October 2019 4 The two studies are being conducted by two different organisations/teams. The evaluation team will be expected to draw upon the studies to inform the overall effectiveness evaluation.

5 Receiving grants from the foundation. 6 For further information see: www.candafoundation.org and the organisational and programmatic theories

of change .

7 As of the beginning of 2019 the working conditions and force and child labour programmes will merge to form the labour rights programme. 8 See www.fashionforgood.org 9 Including the Good Fashion Fund. 10 Including business and foundation partnerships with Save the Children (Humanitarian and DRR); Store Giving Programme (in Europe with community-based organisations and NGOs); Employee Volunteering Programme (in Brazil) and the Inspiring World Programme (global).

11 Until December 2018. 12 See the M&E Policy and M&E Minimum Requirements 13 The AAR is a structured review or de-brief (debriefing) process for analyzing what happened, why it happened, and how it can be done better by the participants and those responsible for the project or event. It was originally developed by US and British military to enable rapid learning from operations.

o

o

14 Including factors thereof that have contributed to successes and failures. 15 All grants (closed and under implementation) up to and including research. 16 This will include inter alia – assessment of structure and distribution of foundation human and financial resources, enabling functions such as operations, communications and effective philanthropy. 17 The family approach to corporate / private philanthropy within the context of Constanter - https://www.constanter.ch/ 18 It is expected that ‘lite’ updates to the Store Giving Programme Evaluation in Europe and Employee Volunteering Programme in Brazil

19 The ‘health’ of the partnership with C&A and its additionality to the foundation’s work. 20 The inception phase is expected to bring further specification to the questions below as appropriate and necessary.

:

21 Answering this question will draw on the Grantee Perception Survey conducted by the Center for Effective Philanthropy. 22 Investment committee and Board. 23 This will include the process of assessing and further refining (through additional theory-based work) impact / systems-changing pathways and drivers and testing assumptions. 24 Benchmarking with other corporate and / or private foundation in terms of operations and governance inter alia. 25 Case study unit of assessment and analyses will be country and / or programme so as to synthesize findings across initiatives. Individual case studies of initiatives should not be emphasized unless significant to the overall strategic approach of the foundation, although there may be exceptions to this such as long-term partnerships with Freedom Fund in Southern India.

26 The Effective Philanthropy team is currently developing a foundation specific set of rubrics / rating system – this work will be completed by February 2019 and the OEE will be able to draw on it.

27 See www.porticus.com 28 Field visits and observation may be delegated to Evaluation Specialists of the foundation’s Effective Philanthropy team.

o

29 Or relevant members of their teams for the tasks below.

30 Linking questions, methods, data sources and indicators. 31 The interim report is expected to be no more than 20 – 25 pages 32 This will be done based on a 24 hour turnaround time by the Effective Philanthropy team in order to minimise loss of time before submission to the Foundation management and External Review Panel.

33 That can be read in 5 – 10 minutes. 34 Excellent English language skills (written and spoken); Hindi; Portuguese; and Spanish are required within the team. Understanding of Bangla / Bengali would be an advantage.

Annex A: Data Sources

35 Companies are welcome to contact Effective Philanthropy for suggestions for local partner organisations or consultants as necessary.

Annex B: Summary of C&A Foundation Portfolio

Programme Number of grants Amount committed (2014 – to present)

Sustainable Raw Materials 41 24'195'515.83

Working Conditions 83 20'909'075.48

Forced and Child Labour 19 16'937'491.00

Circular Fashion 29 50'927'035.05

Strengthening Communities 8 41'542'621.65

Gender Justice 5 2'982'612.00

Other 11 5'163'365.34