17
17 th HAPL Meeting Washington, DC October 30, 2007 Naval Research Laboratory Plasma Physics Division Washington, DC Work supported by DOE/NNSA/DP Optical System and staging of the Electra KrF laser facility NRL M. Wolford M. Myers J. Sethian J. Giuliani Commonwealth Tech F. Hegeler RSI P. Burns SAIC R. Jaynes

17 th HAPL Meeting Washington, DC October 30, 2007 Naval Research Laboratory

  • Upload
    cael

  • View
    25

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

NRL M. Wolford M. Myers J. Sethian J. Giuliani Commonwealth Tech F. Hegeler RSI P. Burns SAIC R. Jaynes. Optical System and staging of the Electra KrF laser facility. 17 th HAPL Meeting Washington, DC October 30, 2007 Naval Research Laboratory Plasma Physics Division - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: 17 th  HAPL Meeting Washington, DC October 30, 2007 Naval Research Laboratory

17th HAPL MeetingWashington, DCOctober 30, 2007

Naval Research LaboratoryPlasma Physics Division

Washington, DC

Work supported by DOE/NNSA/DP

Optical System and staging of the Electra KrF laser facility

NRL M. Wolford

M. MyersJ. SethianJ. Giuliani

Commonwealth Tech

F. Hegeler

RSIP. Burns

SAIC R. Jaynes

Page 2: 17 th  HAPL Meeting Washington, DC October 30, 2007 Naval Research Laboratory

LPX 305 i

Input 0.5 J10 cm x 10 cm

Cylindrical lens Pair

Telescope

1 cm x 3 cm

3 cm x 3 cm

OutputInput

BG 28

LA Vision

Improved Near Field Measurements since last HAPL Meeting

Page 3: 17 th  HAPL Meeting Washington, DC October 30, 2007 Naval Research Laboratory

80% Ar, 0.3% F2

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

8 12 16 20Pressure (psi)

Las

er O

utp

ut

(J)

Orestes 0.5 J Input

Measured Input ~0.5 J

Orestes 0.7 J Input

Measured Input 0.6 J

Single Beam Electra Pre-Amplifier Yield

Page 4: 17 th  HAPL Meeting Washington, DC October 30, 2007 Naval Research Laboratory

Voltage

OutputInput

64.8 ns

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

Time (ns)

Vo

ltag

e (k

eV)

Po

wer

(10

0 M

W)

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Inte

nsi

ty (

arb

.)

Diode VoltageDiode PowerOutputInput

Single Beam Timing Between Laser Input, Laser Output and Electron Beam (10 J)

Page 5: 17 th  HAPL Meeting Washington, DC October 30, 2007 Naval Research Laboratory

-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

Time (ns)

Inte

ns

ity (

arb

.)

1 (-36.3 ns) 3.8 J

2 (1.3 ns) 10.0 J

3 (21.5 ns) 15.7 J

4 (40.7 ns) 20.0 J

5 (64.8 ns) 10.0 J

6 (88.0 ns) 2.9 J

Power (10 GW)

1

2

3

4

5

6

-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

1 2 3 4 56

Input

Output

Single Beam Output Time Dependent Intensity

Page 6: 17 th  HAPL Meeting Washington, DC October 30, 2007 Naval Research Laboratory

0

5

10

15

20

25

-50 0 50 100 150Input Time (ns)

En

erg

y (J

)

80% Ar, 0.3% F2@ 16 psi80%Ar, 0.3% F2@ 18 psiOrestes 16 psi

Orestes 18 psi

-30 -10 10 30 50 70 90Time (ns)

Cause of Discrepancy

Single Beam Pre-Amplifier Yield Function of Input Timing

Page 7: 17 th  HAPL Meeting Washington, DC October 30, 2007 Naval Research Laboratory

LPX

PLCC

Cylindrical Optics6 m Nike Lens

BeamsplitterCalorimeter

Photodiode Combo

770 mJ Laser Input Laser Beam separation ~26 ns

00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9

1

-5.0E-08 0.0E+00 5.0E-08 1.0E-07 1.5E-07Time (s)

Vo

lts

Beam 1 ~ 373 mJBeam 2 ~ 397 mJ

PD 2PD1

Two Beam Angularly Multiplex Preamplifier

Page 8: 17 th  HAPL Meeting Washington, DC October 30, 2007 Naval Research Laboratory

Calorimeter Data

-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

0 25 50 75 100

Time (ns)

Inte

ns

ity

25 J Laser Output

300 mJ Laser Input Laser Beam separation ~26 ns

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0 20 40 60 80 100Time (ns)

Vo

lts

Beam 1 Beam 2

8.1 cm 7.6 cm

9.0 cm 9.7 cm

25 J Output of Two Beam Angularly Multiplex Preamplifier

Dimensions

Page 9: 17 th  HAPL Meeting Washington, DC October 30, 2007 Naval Research Laboratory

LPX

Pre-AMPMain AMP

Electra Laser System

Calorimeter

Photodiode (PDM)

Photodiode (PDTarget)

42 m

Page 10: 17 th  HAPL Meeting Washington, DC October 30, 2007 Naval Research Laboratory

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

600 650 700 750 800 850

Time (ns)

Inte

nsi

ty (

arb

.)

PDM (452 J)

Pdtarget (452 J)

PDM1 2

3 4

5 6

Pdtarget

0

100

200

300

400

500

-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Time (s)E

ner

gy

(J)

Big Calorimeter33 x 33 cm2 Calorimeter

Nike Calorimeters18 x 18 cm2 Calorimeters

Sum

Full Laser System 452 J Single Shot Yield

Page 11: 17 th  HAPL Meeting Washington, DC October 30, 2007 Naval Research Laboratory

Full Laser System Laser Yield Depends on Timing Between LPX, Pre Amplifier and Main Amplifier

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0 50 100 150 200 250Time (ns)

Inte

nsi

ty (

arb

.)

452 J (PDM)237 J (PDM)

The Difference if one or both beams are amplified in Pre-amplifier

Timing Discrepancy Between Amplifiers

Page 12: 17 th  HAPL Meeting Washington, DC October 30, 2007 Naval Research Laboratory

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

-50 0 50 100 150 200Time (ns)

Inte

ns

ity

(a

rb.)

Shot 1 (PDM)Shot 2 (PDM)Shot 3 (PDM)Shot 4 (PDM)Shot 5 (PDM)

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

Time (ns)

Inte

nsi

ty (

arb

.)

Shot 1 (406 J)

Shot 2 (365 J)

Shot 3 (412 J)

Shot 4 (268 J)

Shot 5 (134 J)

PDM1 2

3 4

5 6

PDTarget

Full Laser System Yield 1.585 kJ in One Second 5 Hz Burst

Single Pass Double Pass

Page 13: 17 th  HAPL Meeting Washington, DC October 30, 2007 Naval Research Laboratory

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

-50 0 50 100 150 200Time (ns)

Inte

ns

ity

(a

rb.)

Shot 1 (PDM)Shot 2 (PDM)Shot 3 (PDM)Shot 4 (PDM)Shot 5 (PDM)

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

Time (ns)

Inte

nsi

ty (

arb

.)

Shot 1 (406 J)

Shot 2 (365 J)

Shot 3 (412 J)

Shot 4 (268 J)

Shot 5 (134 J)

Single Pass Double Pass

Why laser Yield is Decreasing with Shot #?

Observation: Larger Percentage Laser Intensity Decrease was observed after one pass than double pass

Probable Cause: A declining input laser intensity into the main amplifier

Page 14: 17 th  HAPL Meeting Washington, DC October 30, 2007 Naval Research Laboratory

Single Shot 5 shot Rep-Rate Burst

Cross Hairs for Scale

Near Field (7m) Beam ProfileSuggests increase in Phase Aberration is the cause for the drop in laser energy for

the Electra Laser System

Page 15: 17 th  HAPL Meeting Washington, DC October 30, 2007 Naval Research Laboratory

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

-20 0 20 40 60 80 100

time (ns)

ampl

itude

(ar

b. u

nits

)

1st shot

5th shot

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

0 50 100 150 200 250

time (ns)

ph

oto

dio

de

amp

litu

de

(V) shot 1

shot 100

shot 200

shot 300

shot 400

shot 500

500 shots @ 5 Hz

5 shots @ 5 Hz

Pre-amp without gas recirculator

Main-amp with gas

recirculator

Pre-amplifier Needs Recirculator For Rep-Rate Operation

Page 16: 17 th  HAPL Meeting Washington, DC October 30, 2007 Naval Research Laboratory

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12Time (seconds)

To

tal L

aser

Yie

ld (

J)Electra Laser System 2.5 kJ 2 second burst @ 5 Hz

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0 50 100 150 200 250

Time (ns)

Inte

ns

ity

(a

rb.)

PDM_1PDM_2PDM_3PDM_4PDM_5PDM_6PDM_7PDM_8PDM_9PDM_10

All Components 5 Hz operational for longer bursts

Again, Low Yield for later shots due to Pre-AmpPhase Aberrations, will be corrected with Recirculator

Calorimeter Response

Page 17: 17 th  HAPL Meeting Washington, DC October 30, 2007 Naval Research Laboratory

1)Pre-Amp Recirculator (Design Complete) (For Beam Quality, Consistent Rep-Rate Output)

2)Improved Coupling from Pre-Amp to Main Amp

3)Improved timing control, Reduced Jitter (improvement already made)

4)Increase and Improve Diagnostics for KrF Code Comparison

5)Strip Cathode for Pre-Amp (Increased Energy Deposition in laser gas by ~25%)

On Going Improvements in Laser System Since Measurements were made