Upload
egbert-york
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 1
Office of theLegislative Auditor General
Performance Audits and Evaluation
Who We Are
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 2
The Office of the Legislative Auditor General (OLAG) is constitutionally created by Article VI Section 33 of the Utah Constitution. The Legislative Auditor General has broad authority to conduct audits of any funds, functions, and accounts in any branch, department, agency or political subdivision of this state.
The Legislative Auditor General is appointed by the Legislature for six year terms.
The Auditor General reports directly to the bipartisan Audit Subcommittee of the Legislative Management Committee.
What We Do
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 3
It is the mission of the Office of the Legislative Auditor General to serve the citizens of Utah and the Legislature by providing objective information, in-depth analyses, and useful recommendations that help Legislators and other decision makers.
The Office of the Legislative Auditor General accomplishes its mission by:
Improving Programs Reducing Costs Promoting Accountability
Completing The Puzzle
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 4
Resolving Issues Identified By Legislators
What Some People Say We Do
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 5
“The Washington State initiative sent ripples through the nation's public-sector auditing community, and for a very simple reason: Performance auditing is an evolving and somewhat controversial practice.” October 2009
“They continue to insist that the exercise focuses more on catching governments in the act than on proactively working to improve key government operations.” October 2009
What Some People Say We Do
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 6
What Some People Say We Do
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 7
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 8
used
wit
h p
erm
issi
on
How We Cope
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 9
F in a n c ia l C o m plia n ce
T ra d it io n a l
E ff ic ie n cy(O p e ra tio n a l)
E ffe ctiven e ss(P ro g ra m )
P e rfo rm a n ce
T yp es o f G o ve rn m e nta l A u d its
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 10
Audit Complexity
DegreeOf
Difficulty
Time & DollarsExpended
Financial
Compliance
Efficiency(Operational)
Effectiveness(Program)
What Is Performance Auditing
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 11
Performance audit refers to an examination of a program, function, operation or the management systems and procedures of a governmental or non-profit entity to assess whether the entity is achieving economy, efficiency and effectiveness in the employment of available resources. The examination is objective and systematic, generally using structured and professionally adopted methodologies.
Examples of Performance Audits
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 12
Completing of the Puzzle Via Legislative Audit Requests
* Identify reasons why a heightened number of jail escapes and other inappropriate activities where happening in county jails.
* Identify instances of fraud, waste, and abuse in Utah’s Medicaid program.
* Review efficiency and effectiveness in Utah’s Medicaid managed care.
* Examine the use of O&M funding for institutions of higher education.
* Are criminal background check procedures in public education effective.
* Are discrimination complaints being processed effectively and equitably.
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 13
OLAG Methodology
inputs activities outputs
Statute – Mission -- Objectives
• people• facilities• equipment• supplies• financial ability
ACTUAL—
• service(s)• product(s)
EFFICIENCY
THE MANNER IN WHICH AN AUDITEE USES ITS RESOURCES TO GENERATE SERVICES OR PRODUCTS
Efficiency Audits Compare How Well Inputs Are Used to Achieve
OutputsAre they performing economically and timely?
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 14
District Planned Elementary Utilization
Actual Elementary Utilization
Planned Secondary Utilization
Actual Secondary Utilization
Alpine 62 % 49 % 127 % 87 %
Davis 55 50 102 60
Jordan 70 50 130 74
Murray 53 48 67 54
Park City 43 33 97 53
Salt Lake 76 61 120 81
Washington 65 58 94 83
Average 62 % 53 % 100 % 65 %
Smaller Buses Should Be Considered
In 12 select school districts
194 Class D school buses could have been replaced with Class C buses
For a potential savings of about $5 million
Class C Bus: Capacity = 72 Average Cost = $ 62,700
Class D Bus: Capacity = 84 Average Cost = $ 88,100
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 15
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 16
OLAG Methodology
inputs activities outputs
Statute – Mission -- Objectives
ACTUAL—
• service(s)• product(s)
EFFECTIVENESS
THE EXTENT TO WHICH AN AUDITEE ACCOMPLISHES ITS OBJECTIVES, AND ULTIMATELY, ITS GOALS
INTENDED—
• service(s)• product(s)
Effectiveness Audit Compares Intended Output to Actual Output
Are they performing well?
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 17
Effectiveness Audit Compares Intended Output to Actual Output
Are they performing well?
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 18
Audit Found: Management did not listen to the jail reviews
Action Taken: New management took action instituted standards and
consequences for not meeting standards
Jail Contracting: Conducted annual reviews of county jails. They were performed for the most part efficient – but they were not effective?
Audit Phases
• Survey Phase - Assess for risk
• Fieldwork Phase – Audit tests
• Report – Fieldwork areas developed into chapters
• Presentation – Audit is made public
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 19
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 20
Operating Methodology: “Attributes of a Finding”
1. Condition – What is happening?
2. Criteria – What should be happening?
3. Effect – What is the impact of the condition?
4. Cause – What created the condition?
5. Recommendation – What should be done? (corrective or preventative action)
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 21
Operating Methodology: Condition
• What is really happening?
• What is working well?
• What is defective or deficient?
• Is the problem isolated or widespread?
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 22
Operating Methodology: Tests For Condition
• Significant Resources
• Impact Upon the Public
• Management Controls
• Performance Measures
• Understanding of Mission and Goals
• Compliance with Statute and Rules
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 23
Medicaid Fraud, Waste, Abuse: Condition
• 25 Year Old Analytical Tool (since last update)
• Unclear Recovery Methodology
• Employee Productivity
• Employee A = 47,384
• Employee B = 476,265
• Inadequate Performance Measures
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 24
Operating Methodology: Criteria
Examples:
• Laws, policies or rules
• Accepted industry standards
• Goals and objectives
• Practices in other states or private sector
• Expert opinion or auditor opinion
• Generally accepted practices
Question
Which one can you
use?
S t r o
n g
e s t —
W e
a
k e
s t
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 25
Medicaid Fraud, Waste, Abuse: Criteria
•Other state Medicaid programs (for general guidance on all areas)
•Federal laws and rules (for analytical tools)
•Accepted business practices (for employee productivity)
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 26
Operating Methodology: Effect
• What is the impact or consequence?
• What is the extent of difference between criteria and condition?
• Is the difference significant in terms of cost, performance, etc.?
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 27
Medicaid Fraud, Waste, Abuse: Effect
•Only 5% of Medicaid dollars were being reviewed for F,W,A
•National Statistics = $20.2 million
WeakestCriteria
WeakestEffect
Strongest
Criteria
Operating Methodology: Criteria & Effect Relationship
Laws or Mission Statements
Industry or Professional Standards
Historical Data or Goals & Objectives
Expert Opinion
Prudent Business Practices
Auditor Opinion
No Significant Impact
Implied Savings
Small Dollar Impact
Improved Services
Large Dollar Impact
Loss of Life or Public Danger
Strongest
Effect
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 28
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 29
Operating Methodology: Finding the Underlying
Cause• Ask why?
• Need documentation
• Lends strength to the recommendation
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 30
Medicaid Fraud, Waste, Abuse: Cause
•Management
•Budget Constraints
•Lack of Adequate Training
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 31
Operating Methodology: Recommendations
• What Should Be Done to Correct the Problem or Issue:
• A direct relationship between the cause and the recommendation.
• Work with organization to get agreement.
• Change is the overall goal.
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 32
Operating Methodology: Recommendations
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 33
Principles For A Successful Audit Function
• Resist Intimidation
– Understanding the source
– Anticipating the act
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 34
Principles For A Successful Audit Function
• Exit for Understanding
– How: Reveal findings often
– Benefit: Strengthens audit findings
• Obtain Participation
– Recommendations can be joint effort
– Implementation is the key to success
17 May 2011Utah Legislative Auditor
General Slide 35
Contact Information
Kade R. Minchey
Office of the Legislative Auditor General
Utah State Capitol Complex
315 House Building
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114
(801) 538-1033 Office
Website: www.le.utah.gov/audit/olag.htm