17-Kesc-prm _ 13 Minutes

8/2/2019 17-Kesc-prm _ 13 Minutes

1/5

1

CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW KESC SUB-STATION AND RELOCATION OF FOUR

GENERATORS AT THE CITY CAMPUS

MINUTES OF MEETING

PROGRESS REVIEW MEETING NO: 13

Progress Review meeting was held to discuss the Progress of Works & other Contractual

matter at the NESPAKs Site Office, IBA City Campus on January 19 , 2012 at 10:00 a.m.

with the following participants.

Participants:-

IBA (Client)

1. Mr. Shakil Anwer Project Engineer

2. Mr. Jawad khan Electrical Engineer

3. Mr. Nazir Ali Naeem Supervisor (Civil)

NESPAK (Project Manager)

1. Mr. Syed Mehdi Hassan Resident Engineer (RE)

2. Mr. Ch. M.Arif Inspector (Civil)

3. Mr. Muhmmad Irfan Inspector (Electrical)

M/s SIEMENS (Contractor)

1.2.

Mr. Muhammad YasirMr. Jahangir Khan

Project ManagerSite Engineer

2. Mr. Syed Furqan Executive Engineer

3. Mr. Akber Ismail P.M (KF Corp.)

Following points were discussed:

DESCRIPTIONACTION BY

1. Work Schedule:

- RE-NESPAK asked the PM-Siemens regarding

the submission of weekly work Program.


2/5

2

- PM-Siemens Confirmed that the weekly work

program for last & current weeks are submitted

to NESPAK site office for monitoring the

progress.

- RE-NESPAK showed his dissatisfaction over thecurrent weekly work program indicating only 30%

progress of Columns up to roof beam and also

other activities of next week. He advised to PM-

Siemens to enhance the man power & material &

complete the mentioned activities in max. one

week time. Otherwise work will be delayed.

- PM-Siemens agreed on it & committed to

achieve the target.

Contractor-Siemens

2. Material / Manufacturer:

- RE-NESPAK asked the PM-Siemens about the

Siemens reply on NESPAK comments on the

submittal of HV Switchgear for further necessary

action & also to avoid any further delay in

manufacturing.

- Executive Engineer-Siemens stated that he

replied on HV Switchgear, yesterday January

18, 2012 through e-mail.

- RE-NESPAK advised to SIEMENS to submits all

necessary documents through hard copies

instead of e-mail.

- Executive Engineer-Siemens agree on it.Contractor-Siemens


3/5

3

3. Generator Yard:

Approval of route for Rerouting of Cables:

- PM-Siemens requested to Project Engineer-IBA

regarding the formal approval for rerouting work.

- Project Engineer-IBA re conformed that verbal

approval has already been given by the Director

Projects (HEC)-IBA in last meeting & which is

recorded in minutes of meeting & should be

consider as Clients approval.

- RE-NESPAK reminded the PM-Siemens to

submit the composite rate analysis of all

additional items complete in all respect and again

instructed to start the work immediately to avoid

any further delay.

- Executive Engineer-Siemens Conformed that he

will submit rate analysis of all additional works

after this meeting & immediate will start the work

on rerouting of cables.

Contractor-Siemens

4. KESC Sub Station:

Slow Progress of Civil Works:

- PM-Siemens informed that concreting of Plinth

Beams have completed on January 18, 2012 as

committed in last meeting.

- RE-Nespak & Project Engineer-IBA suggested

the PM-Siemens that further efforts are required

to recoup the time lost.

- PM-Siemens accepted the Shortcomings and

committed to accelerate the progress of work asContractor-Siemens


4/5

4

maximum as possible.

5. Clients Additional requirements:

- Project Engineer-IBA again discuss the following

requirements:

1. Provide access doors for transformer & LT room

to access the LT System as & when required.

2. A Sleeve for the supply of medium voltage feeder

to AMAN Tower from the new Substation is

required.

3. An ACB of 400 A is required in the LT Room of

the new substation for supplying load to the new

Data centre at City campus.

4. LT Panels may be placed some 2 feet away from

trench on angle iron frame. During the transition

period load cables may be connected one by one

& these panels may be shifted.

Following point wise decision were also taken:

1. EA issued the Construction drawing as per client

requirement through e-mail.

However both Electrical Engineer and Project

Engineer-IBA reviewed the drawing and directed

to use the MS louvered door instead of MS

Corrugated Sheet.

2. Sleeves will be provided in the plinth beam of size

2 x 6.

3. EA-Electrical Engineer confirmed in his email that

the use of 400A ACB in LT panel is not advisable.

4. Siemens has submitted the shop drawing related


5/5

5

to the said requirement for review and approval

from Consultant-EA.

6. Absence of Consultant M/s EA in Progress Review

Meetings:

- PM-Siemens complained that due to the

continuous absence of EAs representative, most

of design issues & Drawings quarries remains

unattended.

- RE-Nespak also emphasized upon the presence

of EAs representative & suggested to Project

Engineer-IBA to make sure the presence of

Consultants representatives so that necessary

decision pertaining to design can be taken timely

to avoid unnecessary delay in the completion of

Project.

The meeting was adjourned with thanks to all participants.

SYED MEHDI HASSANResident Engineer

NESPAK

Muhammad YasirProject Manager

Siemens

Documents

17-Kesc-prm _ 13 Minutes