17 groupthink

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/2/2019 17 groupthink

    1/23

    Group Think

    A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in acohesive in-group,

    when the members'strivings for unanimityoverridetheir motivation torealistically appraise alternative courses of action(Janis 1972: 9)When the desire for unanimity overcomes a groups ability to makerational assessments on all available informationCan include an unquestioned belief in your moral correctnessreligious (give your life to God) or political (Nazi Germany)Reduces team effectiveness because it can remove the ability/need to

    question or validate

  • 8/2/2019 17 groupthink

    2/23

    Group behaviour

    Group Behaviour -Positive and provides for trust, belonging, reliance,Resulting in being happy at work - better more efficient serviceLike minded people with similar ideas expectationsDid not join public service to make a fortuneJoined to

    servemake a difference

    belongget self esteem (Maslow 1987)

    Develop identityFitting-in (Baigent 2001)Surface acting that develops into deep acting (Hochschild 1983)

    Culture can inclusiveRealise needs (Maslow 1987)Avoid alienation (Marx)Resisting deskilling (Braverman 1974)

    Culture can be negative

    Racism (Macpherson 1999)Sexism (Baigent 2008)Resist modernisation (Baigent 2007)

    Outsiders seen as theother (civvies)naive (what do they know about doing the job)deviant stereotyping (sanctions taken against groups)What are the stereotypes associated with being black? How might these affect a black male who wants to join the police?What are the stereotypes associated with women how will this effect women who want to join the fire and rescue service?

  • 8/2/2019 17 groupthink

    3/23

    Formal Public Service Culture

    Weberian Bureaucracy

    Written rules (orders) for everything

    A clear chain of command

    No room for entrepreneurs

    Rationality rules

    An iron cage (Weber)

  • 8/2/2019 17 groupthink

    4/23

    CHIEF FIRE OFFICERTOM CARROLL

    COMMUNITY SAFETYDIRECTORATE

    Lawrie Booth

    MANAGEMENT SERVICESDIRECTORATE

    Cheryl Rolph

    TECHNICAL SERVICESDIRECTORATE

    Peter Warner

    DISTRICT COMMUNITY SAFETYCAMBRIDGE CITY DISTRICT HUNTINGDON DISTRICTDave Warren Peter SharpeEAST CAMBS DISTRICT PETERBOROUGH DISTRICTDave Robertson Paul MalinowskiFENLAND DISTRICT SOUTH CAMBS DISTRICTPaul Fredericks Pat Kilby

    FIRE CONTROLElaine Wakerley

    PERSONAL &ORGANISATIONAL

    DEVELOPMENTGROUP

    Maurice Moore

    CORPORATE &DEMOCRATIC

    SERVICESGROUP

    Fiona Fowler

    HUMANRESOURCESTracy Bennett-

    Tighe/Marissa Reynold

    RESOURCESDIRECTORATE

    John Hummersone

    FLEET & EQUIPMENTSERVICES GROUP

    Frank Laska

    COMMUNITY RISKMANAGEMENT GROUP

    Gerry Dacey

    NEW DIMENSIONSOFFICER

    Andy Dunlop

    AUDIT OFFICERMark Bennett-Tighe

    FINANCE & CONTRACTMANGEMENTGROUP

    Matthew Warren

    INFORMATION &COMMUNICATIONS

    TECHNOLOGY GROUPMartin Scott

    PAYROLL TEAMDaphne Baker

    PROPERTY & ESTATESGROUP

    Danny Rust

    CAMBRIDGESHIRE FIRE AND RESCUE SERVICE - CFRS STRUCTURE

  • 8/2/2019 17 groupthink

    5/23

    CPD

    Requiredtraininginputs

    WatchManagementDevelopmentProgramme

    WATCHMANAGEMENT

    WATCHMANAGEMENT

    Middle

    Management

    Assessment

    Centre

    Decision about progression toStation Management basedupon information gathered

    from the Supervisory

    Management ADC and

    workplace assessment.

    Test of

    Potential

    Appointment into

    Watch Management upon

    consistent demonstration

    of competence.

    Eligible to access

    an NVQ award.

    Specialist

    Role

    Test of

    Potential

    FIREFIGHTER

    FIREFIGHTING

    CPD

    FF Competence confirmed

    through consistent

    performance. Eligible to

    access an NVQ award.

    Potential to develop beyondrole identified throughcontinuous workplace

    assessment and a snapshotof PQAs.

    Point of EntryAssessment

    FirefightingDevelopmentProgramme

    Phase III

    AttractionFirefighting

    DevelopmentPhase I

    DevelopmentFirefightingProgramme

    Phase II

    CPD

    Requiredtraininginputs

    CrewManagementDevelopmentProgramme

    CREWMANAGEMENT

    CREWMANAGEMENT

    SpecialistRole

    Appointment into

    Crew Management upon

    consistent demonstration

    of competence.

    Eligible to access

    an NVQ award.

    Decision about progression toWatch Management basedupon information gathered

    from the Supervisory

    Management ADC and

    workplace assessment .

    Supervisory

    Management

    AssessmentCentre

  • 8/2/2019 17 groupthink

    6/23

    Forming a society

    Jones (1994) suggests that Durkheim has an orthodox consensus view of social structuresmade up of norms, values and rules.

    Durkheim argues we learn about norms, values and rules through socialisation Norms values and rules serve the function of making social life possible Each generation of people pass on these norms, values and rules to the next (tradition) Functionalists believe in a society formed by social structures

    Structures that become real in their consequences (W I Thomas) The argument of functionalist is that any social process exists because they serve a

    function For example we have laws because they lay down the boundaries of what is acceptable in

    a society Durkheim uses the term social solidarity to describe how people achieve social order Social solidaritywas achieved by collective standards and rules of behaviour that make the

    social glue that holds society together Social solidarity/order flows from consensus - the existence of shared norms, values and

    rules When individuals do not feel they belong in a society share the same norms and values

    they feel alienated a situation that Durkheim saw as anomie Mayo, recognise that workers at Hawthorn suffered from anomie they did not feel as is

    they belonged during his experiment he made them feel important that they belongedand therefore they were happier and worked harder.

  • 8/2/2019 17 groupthink

    7/23

    Durkheim

    A collective way of living/being can be termeda culture

    Cultures can be macro gender, ethnicity,class

    Cultures can be micro family, work,teenagers

    Each generation has the ability to change theirculture

    People have a choice if they comply or not In Public Services there are two cultures

    Formal

    Informal

  • 8/2/2019 17 groupthink

    8/23

    These arguments almost make asif culture has a life of its own

    As a result, it is often the culture rather than individualsthat is seen as responsible for how cultural values getput into practice

    Formal police culture may appear to have strength,

    power and authority, but this is due to a combination ofgroup ownership, tradition and history, not because itactually exists.

    Police culture is a structure accepted/constructed by

    the individuals who operate within it Because the culture has to be put into

    action by individuals, there is space for

    those individuals to act differently

  • 8/2/2019 17 groupthink

    9/23

  • 8/2/2019 17 groupthink

    10/23

    There can be a number of viewsabout public service culture.

    values that one cohort of public servants passdown to the next

    a common form of behaviour amongst public

    servants a public service ethos to serve and protect

    values that officers, managers, constables,firefighters, soldiers etc. have in common

    something people sign up to because it providesfor your needs, a sense of belonging, identity,purpose

  • 8/2/2019 17 groupthink

    11/23

    Alienation not here

    Public Servants love their jobs

    Teamwork can prevent alienation from thework process

    Informal culture gives individuals some controlover what they do

    The process of deskilling

    What do the workers feel

  • 8/2/2019 17 groupthink

    12/23

    Tuckman, B. (1965) 'Developmental sequence in small groups', Psychological Bulletin63(6):

    Forming

    Identifying the task and how to accomplish it.

    Deciding what is acceptable group behaviour and how tohandle group conflict

    Deciding what information needs to be gathered to tacklethe task

    Abstract conceptual discussions or some members'impatience with these discussions

    No clear focus on task or problem as evidenced by

    irrelevant discussions Complaining about organisational problems and barriers

    to accomplishing the task instead of focusing on the task

  • 8/2/2019 17 groupthink

    13/23

    Storming

    Arguing among group members, even ifthey agree on the issues

    Choosing sides within the group, bids forpower, drawing divisional lines

    Tension, jealousy, lack of unity, and aperceived hierarchy

    Establishing unobtainable goals, increasedconcerns about too much work to be done.

  • 8/2/2019 17 groupthink

    14/23

    Norming

    Conflict avoidance in an attempt to promoteharmony

    Friendlier discussions on a more personal level,

    more discussions about the dynamics of thegroup, begin to confide in one another

    More of a sense of group cohesion and esprit,more commonality of goals

    Establishing and maintaining realistic groupparameters for behaviour and performance

    Organising how team will sanction transgressors

  • 8/2/2019 17 groupthink

    15/23

    Performing

    Constructively changing one's self--actually changing for the betterment of thegroup.

    Ability to avoid group conflict and, shouldconflict arise, being able to work through it.

    Much closer identity with the group,understanding each other's strengths andweaknesses.

  • 8/2/2019 17 groupthink

    16/23

  • 8/2/2019 17 groupthink

    17/23

    Self-appointed peer group leaders members who protect the group Maintain/police behaviour Protect the current culture holding the accepted norms, values and rules in trust for the next generation

    An illusion of invulnerability, We know best Optimistic about your power Prepared to challenge managers covertly

    Ignore modernisationCollectively

    Rationalise your arguments Discount warnings Avoid reconsidering your assumptions Justify what you think Stick with past views (traditions)

    An unquestioned belief that the group is right Belief in the group's inherent morality

    Ignoring the real, ethical or moral consequences of your actionsStereotyped views of politicians managers public

    Too weak Too stupid Dont know whats going on

    Overcome any efforts to change Without solidarity we shall loose our way of knowing the job link this to a view about serving the public Make it clear that loyalty is key to solidarity Snowball and confront anyone who challenges the groups view Teach lessons about what it means to be marginalised

    Self-censorship Dont even consider the consequences of action or lack of reflection Distort incoming arguments Minimise/discount any thoughts that you might be wrong

    Shared illusion We are all together Sink or swim

    Silence is consent we permit what we allow/ignore

  • 8/2/2019 17 groupthink

    18/23

    Norming and Action theories

    Impression management (Goffman)Labelling theory (Becker)Deviancy amplification (Cohen)

    What if you are black how might the policeservice label you

    What do the public services think ofmodernisation

    How does the label female affect you if youare applying for a job the fire service

  • 8/2/2019 17 groupthink

    19/23

    Macpherson, W. (1999) The Stephen Lawrence

    Inquiry, London: HMSO.6.44 We heed this warning, but upon all the facts we assert that the conclusion that racism played itspart in this case is fully justified. Mere incompetence cannot of itself account for the whole catalogue offailures, mistakes, misjudgements, and lack of direction and control which bedevilled the Stephen

    6.3 In this Inquiry we have not heard evidence of overt racism or discrimination, unless it can be saidthat the use of inappropriate expressions such as "coloured" or "negro" fall into that category. The useof such words, which are now well known to be offensive, displays at least insensitivity and lack of

    training. A number of officers used such terms, and some did not even during their evidence seem tounderstand that the terms were offensive and should not be used.

    11.36 The main conclusion that we reach is that the inadequacy of the steps taken was as the result ofthe failure of direction by supervisory officers. The standard of command and co-ordination during thefirst two hours after this murder was in the opinion of the Inquiry abysmal.

    The collective failure of an organisation to provide an appropriate and professional service to people

    because of their colour, culture, or ethnic origin. It can be seen or detected in processes, attitudes andbehaviour which amount to discrimination through unwitting prejudice, ignorance, thoughtlessness andracist stereotyping which disadvantage minority ethnic people.

    B i G (2002) Th F t f th fi

  • 8/2/2019 17 groupthink

    20/23

    Bain, G. (2002) The Future of the fireservice: reducing risk, saving lives, London:

    ODPM

    10. Personnel policy, procedures and practices in the Fire Service give cause for concern. Despite clearpolicies from management and the FBU in favour of diversity, in practice only lip-service is paid to it.Harassment and bullying are still too prevalent.

    The leadership must recognise that urgent action is required. An improved programme of HR management must be put inplace as a matter of priority. The work on the introduction of the new Integrated Personal Development System (IPDS) gives aframework for this improvement programme. But the programme itself will not be a substitute for real effort by management at alllevels to tackle the problems. (Bain 2002: V).

    6.28 We have been told by many including some politicians that the leadership and general input from local politicians to fireauthorities is poor. This is disappointing. If only because of the spotlight that has now been shone on the Service, it must be clear to allthat good leadership and management have been lacking in many respects.

  • 8/2/2019 17 groupthink

    21/23

    DB: So if there's a positive action day for ethnicminorities only, do you think, is that a good ora bad thing?

    Ff:I think thats racist

    .DB: You think its racist?

    LF: Yes, absolutely. Its out and outdiscrimination against the white, well,

    every other. It basically says it doesntmatter if you apply or not, theyre not

    interested in you as a person or interestedin this group or this group at this time.

    Positive Action another view

  • 8/2/2019 17 groupthink

    22/23

    FireWorksfor equality in the fire service

    Barriers of Ethnic Minority RecruitmentPerceived BarriersCultural sensitivities prohibitedsome BEM groups from

    applyingReligious restrictions preventedother ethnic groups fromapplying

    Asians saw the firefightingprofession as a low-statuscareerProblem of recruitment restedwith BEM groups

  • 8/2/2019 17 groupthink

    23/23

    I think therefore I am

    Fitting-in