1
Sacredspace Creative Potential It is the natural instinct of a child to work from within outwards; “First I think, and then I draw my think.” But we teach the child to stop thinking, and only to observe! Ananda K Coomaraswamy A fter 29 days, 42 pool matches and some unexpected results, cricket’s World Cup has finally entered its business end. A month ago few would have expected that Dhoni’s Team India would be standing at this stage with New Zealand, as one of the tournament’s only two unbeaten teams. India’s bowlers who could do nothing right for two months in Australia before the World Cup have emerged as their surprise trump cards, bowling out the opposition in every single game. Combined with the resurgence of Shikhar Dhawan, the big- match temperament of Virat Kohli and the rediscovery of Mahendra Singh Dhoni’s touch as the game’s best finisher alongside, of course, his ice-cool captaincy, India enter the quarter-finals as one of the fa- vourites and with the momentum of an unprecedented winning streak. India will be wary of taking Bangladesh’s giant-killing tigers lightly, given the new-found effervescence and self- belief in Mashrafe Murtaza’s team. But few would deny that current odds are on a possible semi-final matchup with Australia in Sydney on March 26. Judging by how teams have played so far Australia remains the most com- plete all-round unit; New Zealand a major favourite, with its fearsome swing bowlers; and Sri Lanka’s old guard, led by the marvellous Kumara Sangakkara, have given notice that they can chase anything. South Africa, despite playing some blinders, have so far justified their tag of chokers; West Indies, held together by a young captain, have just about managed to hang on; and Pakistan, powered by their pace battery, have regained some of their verve. Bangladesh, for the first time, look like they are more than just a one-match wonder. Their spirited challenge to New Zealand showed that Sunil Gavaskar may have been right that England would have been easier quarter-final opponents for India. With more 350 plus scores in group stages than any other World Cup so far, batsmen-friendly tracks and field restrictions have fundamentally skewed the balance between batsmen and bowlers. Only the most exceptional bowlers have prospered. But it will be a different ball game as teams look to lift their intensity in the knock- out matches. Dhoni will be hoping to capitalise on Team India’s perfect start. But he’s also aware that the only thing more difficult than winning a World Cup is defending it. Cup For India? Team’s resurgence and batsmen-favouring rules stand out as World Cup enters knockout rounds When it comes to women, Indian male politicians, particularly the subaltern netajis from the north, don’t believe in vote banks. They may cultivate the Yadav votebank, Muslim votebank, mahadalit votebank but the women votebank? Nope, gender justice is bad politics in the Hindi heartland. Sharad Yadav’s party believes in Bihari asmita but he clearly doesn’t believe in women’s asmita. His ideological ancestor Ram Manohar Lohia strove all his life for gender equality but Sharad prefers bahus and betis, dubbing all other women as “parkati mahila” and thus signalling that he’s a proud hater of modern women. But why is Sharadji now fantasising about “dark” South Indian women and their bodies? Is the Ganga not curvaceous enough in Bihar or are Bihari ladies simply not eating enough sattu? Or does the Yadav stalwart fancy doing a flute-playing Kanhaiya act in his 67 th year surrounded by dancing South Indian gopis? No wonder all gathered male MPs in Parliament laughed along. A woman is raped in India every 20 minutes but Sharad has a 36-24-36 vision. But why blame him alone? None other than the president’s son, Abhijit Mukher- jee, believes “dented” and “painted” women have no right to protest against rape. And hadn’t Mulayam Singh Yadav once thundered that rape victims would be given jobs because after all rapists will always be rapists? The Yadav parivar has its own methods of enfranchising women: give election tickets to their wives and daughters and ensure they keep their mouths shut in Parliament. Except for a single statistics-laden diatribe on crimes against women, Dimple Yadav, MP from Kannauj and daughter-in-law of Mulayam, wife of Akhilesh, has kept mostly quiet. The milky complexioned Dimple may not meet the approval of Sharad Yadav though, whose favourite song is gori (chamri) pe itna gumaan na kar. And what would the pale-skinned Jayalalithaa say to his characterising all South Indian women as “dark”? During the rape law debate in Parliament, turning a deaf ear to Nirbhaya protestors, Sharad had asked which man had not chased and followed a woman? Shunning caste and region, clearly Sharad would opt to chase bharatanatyam dancers beyond the Vindhyas (only if they had achche bodies of course) rather than follow the nearest Gangetic bombshell. But why worry? After all, when the Bihari makes a clean breast of turning his gaze southwards we know the cause of national integration is in safe hands and the body politic holds firm. Sharad’s body blow Sagarika.Ghose@timesgroup.com Netajis and their 36-24-36 vision of national unity A failure to come to terms with history weighs on all the important bilater- al relationships in Asia. As the 70th anniversary of the end of World War II approaches, some Asian nations are resurrecting the ghosts of history. China, for example, is planning a grand military parade in Beijing on Sep- tember 3 to commemorate what it calls “Victory over Japan Day”. The Commu- nist Party mouthpiece People’s Daily said the parade will display China’s mili- tary prowess and “make Japan tremble”. An increasingly muscular China, however, is rattling not only Japan but al- so its other neighbours. How diplomatic relationships are held hostage to history is best exemplified by the strained ties between America’s closest regional allies – South Korea and Japan. These two countries face a stark choice today: Find ways to stem the recrudescence of bitter disputes over history or stay frozen in a political rela- tionship that plays into China’s hands. No country loves to play the history card more than China, as illustrated by its recent declaration of two new national days to remember Japanese aggression. But what if the victims of China’s aggres- sion since the communist “revolution”, such as India and Vietnam, dedicated days to commemorate Chinese attacks on them? Although history is never an objective chronicle, it greatly shapes national nar- ratives. In Asia, the “history problem” has spurred a resurgence of competing and mutually reinforcing nationalisms. Indeed, several Asian states use history selectively to promote national agendas geared towards whitewashing their past aggressions or reinforcing their victim- hood narrative. Squabbles over history and remembrance remain the principal obstacle to political reconciliation in Asia, reinforcing negative stereotypes of rival nations and helping to rationalise claims to territories long held by other nations. Honouring one country’s heroes and history can be done without seeking to alienate, provoke or rub salt in the wounds of another nation. In an econom- ically booming but politically divisive Asia, however, relations between nations remain trapped in a mutually reinforcing loop: Poor political relations help magni- fy and accentuate the history problem, thus chaining diplomatic ties to history. Breaking out of this vicious circle demands forward thinking. At present, though, attempts to rewrite or sugarcoat history, including by revising textbooks or erecting memorials to newfound heroes, are inciting greater regional rancour and recrimination. South Korean-Japanese and Chi- nese-Japanese disputes over territories, war memorials, textbooks and natural resources are tied to an entangled histo- ry. The Sino-Indian relationship is also a prisoner of the past, especially China’s elimination of the historical buffer – Ti- bet – and its subsequent attack on India. Even the Chinese-Korean relation- ship carries the baggage of history, as un- derscored by China’s revisionist claim to the ancient kingdom of Koguryo. The recent commitment of US President Barack Obama and Prime Minister Narendra Modi to work with likeminded states to build power equi- librium in Asia can make little headway if history continues to hinder relations even between democracies. Take Japan and South Korea: As export-oriented powerhouses with traditionally close cultural ties, the two share many values. But resurgent history issues between them have dimmed hopes of a concert of democracies to rein in China’s assertiveness. The century-old case of Korean activist Ahn Jung-geun illustrates history’s divi- sive hold. Considered a terrorist in Japan, where he was hanged, but a hero in South Korea, Ahn assassinated four-time Japa- nese Prime Minister and the first Resident- General of Korea Hirobumi Ito in 1909 at the Harbin railway station in China. The case resurfaced after China opened a memorial hall in Harbin in January 2014 commemorating Ahn, prompting Japan to denounce China for glorifying a terrorist. That memorial – built at South Korean President Park Geun-hye’s request – has been likened by some to building a statute in Dallas to John F Kennedy’s killer, Lee Harvey Oswald. South Korea, a hyper-nationalistic state, has eliminated the last vestiges of Ja- panese colonial rule. But not all Asian states seek to obliterate their colonial past. India continues to transact much of its key government business from British-era edifices, and some of its major criminal and civil laws date from the colonial period. Taiwan – a former Japanese colony – also has a tolerant view of its period of subjugation. Many nations, however, blend histor- ical fact with myth. For example, China, as the fairy-tale Middle Kingdom, claims to be the mother of all civilisations, weaving legend with history to foster a chauvinistic Han culture centred on regaining lost glory, or what President Xi Jinping calls the “Chinese dream”. The Communist Party projects great- power status as China’s historical entitle- ment. Meanwhile, harmful historical lega- cies are creating serious impediments to rational policy choices. Park, for example, seeks closer ties with China when South Korea’s natural regional partner is Japan. Asian states cannot change their past but they can strive to shape a more coop- erative future. As a Russian proverb puts it pithily, “Forget the past and lose an eye; dwell on the past and lose both eyes.” The writer is a geostrategist History Holds Asia Hostage Squabbles over remembrance remain the principal obstacle to reconciliation Brahma Chellaney Take Japan and South Korea: As export-oriented powerhouses, they share many values. But resurgent history issues between them have dimmed hopes of a concert of democracies to rein in China’s assertiveness W inding up his Indian Ocean tour, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced a slew of pacts to boost ties between India and Sri Lanka. Modi’s bilateral visit to the island nation – the first by an Indian PM in 28 years – comes within a month of Lankan President Maithripala Sirisena’s visit to New Delhi. The back to back trips exemplify a new synergy between the two sides after Sirisena swept to power in January elections, defeating long- time strongman Mahinda Rajapaksa. This has now yielded four agreements on customs, visa, youth development and building a Tagore memorial in Sri Lanka. But more than the promise of developing Trincomalee as a petro- leum hub and extending a new $318 million line of credit for Lankan railways, it’s Modi’s pitch that’s interesting. Emphasising issues of di- versity and his own government’s attempts at promoting cooperative federalism, Modi urged the Lankan leadership to operationalise the 13th Amendment to the Sri Lankan Constitution and devolve powers to provinces. Simultane- ously, he assured the Lankan business commu- nity that New Delhi was ready to address trade imbalances and that India’s vast market was available for mutual economic benefits. All of this suggests a shift in India’s neighbourhood strategy. For far too long Indian foreign policy has been defined by defensiveness, con- scious more of dangers than of opportunities abroad. Refreshingly, the Modi government appears to favour a more robust approach that includes projecting India as a force for stability and development. It’s precisely for this reason that Modi’s trip to Sri Lanka – and Mauritius and Seychelles earlier – is more than just an exercise to counter Chi- na’s growing influence in the region. A conscious Indian Ocean policy finally appears to be New Delhi’s priority. Instead of shying away from geopolitical realities, India should leverage its economic and soft power in the Indian Ocean Rim to further its strategic objectives. Strategic Shift Modi’s Indian Ocean tour marks a refreshingly robust approach to foreign policy THE TIMES OF INDIA, AHMEDABAD MONDAY, MARCH 16, 2015 14 THE TIMES OF IDEAS Mahatma Gandhi’s statue, created by sculptor Philip Jackson, has been unveiled outside the British Parliament. The bronze sculpture has faced popular support and controversy, propelled by donations to the Gandhi Statue Memorial Trust reaching over one million pounds. Speaking with Rohit E David, Jackson discussed the relevance of Mahatma Gandhi in history and today, sculpture versus images or words – and what he’d say to those oppos- ing Gandhi’s statue in Britain and British statues in India: Compared to sculpting a mythical figure, what does an icon’s statue convey? An iconic sculpture is one that encompasses the spirit and essence of the subject – and becomes identified with the country it is sited in. Don’t such statues run the risk of becoming banal, eventu- ally part of the background? No, sculptures do not become banal. They are a nation’s history, in the street for all to see. For those that pass them every day, they may become part of the background – but for those that journey to visit them, they become a focus of admira- tion, devotion or memory. What does a statue convey over say, words or pictures? A sculpture is a three-dimensional portrait that can be viewed close to and at a distance. It can be touched and seen in all light conditions and weathers – no words or painting can do this. A sculpture truly stands in the architectural environ- ment that the viewer inhabits. Statues also face criticism. Certain groups in Britain campaigned against this statue, citing Gandhiji’s personal life your thoughts on this? Public sculptures gen- erally always portray people that have done great things or effected great changes. There will always be people who oppose what they have done or what they stand for – and will try to discredit them in whatever way they can. In India, certain groups cam- paigned to re- move statues from colonial times – your words to them? You can- not change history by removing evidence of the past. What statue in the world moves you most? The Artillery Monument at Hyde Park Corner, London, sculpted by Charles Sargeant Jagger. Of all your works, which is really special to you? The Korean War Memorial, which is a bronze statue of a British soldier, made by me. It’s just round the corner from the Houses of Parliament but the Gandhi sculpture is my first opposite the British Parliament. Can you tell us about the process of sculpting Mahatma Gandhi’s image? Well, i wanted to get into the sculpture his compassion, his thought- fulness, courage and determination. It took me months of intensive work and i worked on it alone. The statue itself shows Gandhi as he appeared in 1931, when he visited London and then Prime Minister Ramsay MacDonald. So, it depicts Gandhi in England. What does Mahatma Gandhi represent to you and many in the UK? I think Gandhi proved great things can be achieved without violence – a powerful lesson for today’s world. Placing Gandhi in Parliament Square is also a great compliment, a gesture of friendship and affection towards India. It shows the esteem Mahatma Gandhi is held in by the people of Britain. ‘Gandhi won great things without violence – i wanted to depict his determined courage’ Q & A M uch has been written about blessing, but something we don’t think much about is blessing oneself. Earlier, it was thought that only older people, teachers or gurus could give blessings. It has now become more widely accepted that anyone can give or offer a blessing, spoken out or unspoken. While many now are comfortable with blessing others, sharing the idea of blessing oneself always brings on that ‘Whaaaat?’ look whenever i mention it. The act of blessing – whether for others or oneself – interrupts the habitual way we see, feel and think about things, the shift allowing us to experience things differently than we normally would. One example that i find inspiring is about a woman who told me that she had to undergo surgery of her leg at a very young age. Many years later she began to have nightmares about not knowing what had been done to the limb that had been removed during surgery. When i spoke of blessing oneself, she wondered if she could bless that part of her which was no longer there, and began to do so. As she did this not only was she able to first get in touch with her buried deep anger about not being told much about it by either parents or doctors, but she was able to work through her emotions. The nightmares stopped. And now she blesses her prosthesis each time she uses it. Blessing oneself helps when you might be weighed down by negative self-talk. So many people deplete their energy by constantly evaluat- ing, comparing and condemn- ing themselves or by being angry for things they have done or have not done, or feeling like they are not ‘good enough’. Whenever you bless something, it what you know, because of what you don’t know. Bless what is and what has to change in you or for you. Bless yourself for those you have helped or inspired; some you may be aware of, some you may not. It hardly matters if they bless you or not. Bless your own good intentions. Bless yourself for what you have been open to learn; bless yourself for what you have taught. Bless what you see as your failures, not just your successes. You might find you have learnt more from the former than the latter. Bless your needs and also your greeds! You are human after all. Bless your humanness, your intelligence and those moments you have used it as well as those times you have not. Bless your fears, at least you have acknowledged them, and can now work on them. Bless your willing- ness to bless yourself, even if at first you thought it was a bit strange! Follow Marguerite Theophil at speakingtree.in brings you into a state of love and gratitude. This changes your frame of mind, perception and energy from a negative state to a more positive one. You can begin to shift a pattern of criticism and negative evaluation by blessing both the positive and nega- tive aspects and being grateful for who you are on a daily basis. You can bless your past, even if it has large chapters of pain or sorrow; it made you who you are to- day. Then when you clearly and compassionately see how you are today, that in turn will help shape you into who you want to be. Today, bless yourself for just ‘being you’. Bless your own part in your relationships, whether you consider them good or bad. This is how you are in the relationship because of circumstances, because of responses from the other, because of Feel Free To Shower Blessings On Yourself Marguerite Theophil the speaking tree dilbert theysaidit This kind of political espionage and snooping into political opponent’s life may be Gujarat model but not Indian model – Abhishek Singhvi Everyone says now that we have won Delhi we will win other states as well. Are we a Napoleon on the victory march? Why don’t Britishers set up a statue in London of those who genuinely fought against them, like Bhagat Singh, Azad, Rajguru, Bismil, etc.? – Arvind Kejriwal – Markandey Katju Winning isn’t everything – but wanting to win is VINCE LOMBARDI, US football player A thought for today

16_03_2015_014_57ed2abc6bacefcc5fcd02cea94ff4c2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

t

Citation preview

  • SacredspaceCreative Potential

    It is the natural instinct of a child to work from within outwards; First

    I think, and then I draw mythink. But we teach the child

    to stop thinking, and only to observe!

    Ananda K Coomaraswamy

    After 29 days, 42 pool matches and some unexpected results,crickets World Cup has finally entered its business end. Amonth ago few would have expected that Dhonis Team Indiawould be standing at this stage with New Zealand, as one of the tournaments only two unbeaten teams. Indias bowlers who coulddo nothing right for two months in Australia before the World Cup have emerged as their surprise trump cards, bowling out the opposition in every single game.

    Combined with the resurgence of Shikhar Dhawan, the big-match temperament of Virat Kohli and the rediscovery of MahendraSingh Dhonis touch as the games best finisher alongside, of course,his ice-cool captaincy, India enter the quarter-finals as one of the fa-

    vourites and with the momentum of anunprecedented winning streak. Indiawill be wary of taking Bangladeshs giant-killing tigers lightly, given thenew-found effervescence and self-belief in Mashrafe Murtazas team.But few would deny that current oddsare on a possible semi-final matchupwith Australia in Sydney on March 26.

    Judging by how teams have playedso far Australia remains the most com-plete all-round unit; New Zealand a

    major favourite, with its fearsome swing bowlers; and Sri Lankasold guard, led by the marvellous Kumara Sangakkara, have givennotice that they can chase anything. South Africa, despite playingsome blinders, have so far justified their tag of chokers; West Indies,held together by a young captain, have just about managed to hangon; and Pakistan, powered by their pace battery, have regained someof their verve. Bangladesh, for the first time, look like they are morethan just a one-match wonder. Their spirited challenge to New Zealand showed that Sunil Gavaskar may have been right that England would have been easier quarter-final opponents for India.

    With more 350 plus scores in group stages than any other WorldCup so far, batsmen-friendly tracks and field restrictions have fundamentally skewed the balance between batsmen and bowlers.Only the most exceptional bowlers have prospered. But it will be adifferent ball game as teams look to lift their intensity in the knock-out matches. Dhoni will be hoping to capitalise on Team Indias perfect start. But hes also aware that the only thing more difficultthan winning a World Cup is defending it.

    Cup For India?Teams resurgence and batsmen-favouring rulesstand out as World Cup enters knockout rounds

    When it comes to women, Indian male politicians, particularlythe subaltern netajis from the north, dont believe in votebanks. They may cultivate the Yadav votebank, Muslim votebank, mahadalit votebank but the women votebank?Nope, gender justice is bad politics in the Hindi heartland.

    Sharad Yadavs party believes in Bihari asmita but heclearly doesnt believe in womens asmita. His ideological ancestor Ram Manohar Lohia strove all his life for gender equality but Sharad prefers bahusand betis, dubbing all other women as parkati mahila and thus signallingthat hes a proud hater of modern women.

    But why is Sharadji now fantasising about dark South Indian women andtheir bodies? Is the Ganga not curvaceous enough in Bihar or are Bihari ladiessimply not eating enough sattu? Or does the Yadav stalwart fancy doing a flute-playing Kanhaiya act in his 67th year surrounded by dancing South Indian gopis? No wonder all gathered male MPs in Parliament laughed along.

    A woman is raped in India every 20 minutes but Sharad has a 36-24-36 vision.But why blame him alone? None other than the presidents son, Abhijit Mukher-jee, believes dented and painted women have no right to protest against rape.

    And hadnt Mulayam Singh Yadav once thundered that rape victimswould be given jobs because after all rapists will always be rapists?

    The Yadav parivar has its own methods of enfranchising women:give election tickets to their wives and daughters and ensure they keep

    their mouths shut in Parliament. Except for a single statistics-laden diatribe oncrimes against women, Dimple Yadav, MP from Kannauj and daughter-in-law ofMulayam, wife of Akhilesh, has kept mostly quiet. The milky complexionedDimple may not meet the approval of Sharad Yadav though, whose favouritesong is gori (chamri) pe itna gumaan na kar. And what would the pale-skinnedJayalalithaa say to his characterising all South Indian women as dark?

    During the rape law debate in Parliament, turning a deaf ear to Nirbhayaprotestors, Sharad had asked which man had not chased and followed a woman?Shunning caste and region, clearly Sharad would opt to chase bharatanatyamdancers beyond the Vindhyas (only if they had achche bodies of course) ratherthan follow the nearest Gangetic bombshell. But why worry? After all, when theBihari makes a clean breast of turning his gaze southwards we know the causeof national integration is in safe hands and the body politic holds firm.

    Sharads body blow

    [email protected]

    Netajis and their 36-24-36 vision of national unity

    Afailure to come to termswith history weighs onall the important bilater-al relationships in Asia.As the 70th anniversaryof the end of World War II

    approaches, some Asian nations are resurrecting the ghosts of history.

    China, for example, is planning agrand military parade in Beijing on Sep-tember 3 to commemorate what it callsVictory over Japan Day. The Commu-nist Party mouthpiece Peoples Dailysaid the parade will display Chinas mili-tary prowess and make Japan tremble.

    An increasingly muscular China,however, is rattling not only Japan but al-so its other neighbours. How diplomaticrelationships are held hostage to historyis best exemplified by the strained tiesbetween Americas closest regional allies South Korea and Japan.

    These two countries face a starkchoice today: Find ways to stem the recrudescence of bitter disputes overhistory or stay frozen in a political rela-tionship that plays into Chinas hands.

    No country loves to play the historycard more than China, as illustrated by itsrecent declaration of two new nationaldays to remember Japanese aggression.But what if the victims of Chinas aggres-sion since the communist revolution,such as India and Vietnam, dedicated daysto commemorate Chinese attacks on them?

    Although history is never an objectivechronicle, it greatly shapes national nar-ratives. In Asia, the history problemhas spurred a resurgence of competingand mutually reinforcing nationalisms.

    Indeed, several Asian states use historyselectively to promote national agendasgeared towards whitewashing their pastaggressions or reinforcing their victim-hood narrative. Squabbles over historyand remembrance remain the principalobstacle to political reconciliation in Asia,reinforcing negative stereotypes of rivalnations and helping to rationalise claimsto territories long held by other nations.

    Honouring one countrys heroes andhistory can be done without seeking to

    alienate, provoke or rub salt in thewounds of another nation. In an econom-ically booming but politically divisiveAsia, however, relations between nationsremain trapped in a mutually reinforcingloop: Poor political relations help magni-fy and accentuate the history problem,thus chaining diplomatic ties to history.

    Breaking out of this vicious circle demands forward thinking. At present,though, attempts to rewrite or sugarcoathistory, including by revising textbooksor erecting memorials to newfound heroes, are inciting greater regionalrancour and recrimination.

    South Korean-Japanese and Chi-nese-Japanese disputes over territories,war memorials, textbooks and naturalresources are tied to an entangled histo-ry. The Sino-Indian relationship is also aprisoner of the past, especially Chinaselimination of the historical buffer Ti-bet and its subsequent attack on India.

    Even the Chinese-Korean relation-ship carries the baggage of history, as un-

    derscored by Chinas revisionist claim tothe ancient kingdom of Koguryo.

    The recent commitment of US President Barack Obama and PrimeMinister Narendra Modi to work with likeminded states to build power equi-librium in Asia can make little headwayif history continues to hinder relationseven between democracies.

    Take Japan and South Korea: As export-oriented powerhouses with

    traditionally close cultural ties, the twoshare many values. But resurgent historyissues between them have dimmed hopesof a concert of democracies to rein in Chinas assertiveness.

    The century-old case of Korean activistAhn Jung-geun illustrates historys divi-sive hold. Considered a terrorist in Japan,where he was hanged, but a hero in SouthKorea, Ahn assassinated four-time Japa-nese Prime Minister and the first Resident-General of Korea Hirobumi Ito in 1909 at the Harbin railway station in China.

    The case resurfaced after Chinaopened a memorial hall in Harbin in January 2014 commemorating Ahn,prompting Japan to denounce China forglorifying a terrorist. That memorial built at South Korean President ParkGeun-hyes request has been likened bysome to building a statute in Dallas to JohnF Kennedys killer, Lee Harvey Oswald.

    South Korea, a hyper-nationalisticstate, has eliminated the last vestiges of Ja-panese colonial rule. But not all Asianstates seek to obliterate their colonial past.

    India continues to transact much ofits key government business from British-era edifices, and some of its major criminal and civil laws date fromthe colonial period. Taiwan a formerJapanese colony also has a tolerantview of its period of subjugation.

    Many nations, however, blend histor-ical fact with myth. For example, China,as the fairy-tale Middle Kingdom, claimsto be the mother of all civilisations,weaving legend with history to foster achauvinistic Han culture centred on regaining lost glory, or what President Xi Jinping calls the Chinese dream.

    The Communist Party projects great-power status as Chinas historical entitle-ment. Meanwhile, harmful historical lega-cies are creating serious impediments torational policy choices. Park, for example,seeks closer ties with China when SouthKoreas natural regional partner is Japan.

    Asian states cannot change their pastbut they can strive to shape a more coop-erative future. As a Russian proverb putsit pithily, Forget the past and lose an eye;dwell on the past and lose both eyes.

    The writer is a geostrategist

    History Holds Asia HostageSquabbles over remembrance remain the principal obstacle to reconciliation

    Brahma Chellaney

    Take Japan and South Korea:As export-orientedpowerhouses, they sharemany values. But resurgenthistory issues between themhave dimmed hopes of aconcert of democracies torein in Chinas assertiveness

    Winding up his Indian Ocean tour, Prime Minister NarendraModi announced a slew of pacts to boost ties between India and Sri Lanka. Modis bilateral visit to the island nation the first by an Indian PM in 28 years comes within a monthof Lankan President Maithripala Sirisenas visit to New Delhi. Theback to back trips exemplify a new synergy between the two sides after Sirisena swept to power in January elections, defeating long-time strongman Mahinda Rajapaksa. This has now yielded fouragreements on customs, visa, youth development and building a Tagore memorial in Sri Lanka.

    But more than the promise of developing Trincomalee as a petro-leum hub and extending a new $318 million lineof credit for Lankan railways, its Modis pitchthats interesting. Emphasising issues of di-versity and his own governments attempts atpromoting cooperative federalism, Modi urgedthe Lankan leadership to operationalise the13th Amendment to the Sri Lankan Constitutionand devolve powers to provinces. Simultane-ously, he assured the Lankan business commu-

    nity that New Delhi was ready to address trade imbalances and thatIndias vast market was available for mutual economic benefits.

    All of this suggests a shift in Indias neighbourhood strategy. For fartoo long Indian foreign policy has been defined by defensiveness, con-scious more of dangers than of opportunities abroad. Refreshingly, theModi government appears to favour a more robust approach that includes projecting India as a force for stability and development. Itsprecisely for this reason that Modis trip to Sri Lanka and Mauritiusand Seychelles earlier is more than just an exercise to counter Chi-nas growing influence in the region. A conscious Indian Ocean policyfinally appears to be New Delhis priority. Instead of shying away fromgeopolitical realities, India should leverage its economic and soft power in the Indian Ocean Rim to further its strategic objectives.

    Strategic ShiftModis Indian Ocean tour marks a refreshingly

    robust approach to foreign policy

    THE TIMES OF INDIA, AHMEDABADMONDAY, MARCH 16, 201514 THE TIMES OF IDEAS

    Mahatma Gandhis statue, created bysculptor Philip Jackson, has been unveiled outside the British Parliament.The bronze sculpture has faced popularsupport and controversy, propelled by donations to the Gandhi Statue Memorial Trust reaching over one million pounds. Speaking with RohitE David, Jackson discussed the relevance of Mahatma Gandhi inhistory and today, sculpture versus images or words andwhat hed say to those oppos-ing Gandhis statue in Britainand British statues in India:

    Compared to sculpting amythical figure, what doesan icons statue convey?

    An iconic sculpture is onethat encompasses the spiritand essence of the subject and becomes identified with thecountry it is sited in. Dont such statues run therisk of becoming banal, eventu-ally part of the background?

    No, sculptures do not become banal. They are a nations history, inthe street for all to see.

    For those that pass them everyday, they may become part of the background but for those that journey to visit them, they become a focus of admira-tion, devotion or memory. What does a statue convey

    over say, words or pictures?A sculpture is a three-dimensional

    portrait that can be viewed close to and at a distance. It can be touched and seen in all light conditions

    and weathers no words orpainting can do this.

    A sculpture truly standsin the architectural environ-ment that the viewer inhabits.

    Statues also face criticism.Certain groups in Britaincampaigned against thisstatue, citing Gandhijispersonal life yourthoughts on this?

    Public sculptures gen-erally always portray people that have done greatthings or effected greatchanges. There will alwaysbe people who oppose whatthey have done or whatthey stand for and will

    try to discredit them inwhatever way they can.

    In India, certaingroups cam-

    paigned to re-move statues

    from colonialtimes yourwords tothem?

    You can-not changehistory by

    removing evidence of the past. What statue in the world movesyou most?

    The Artillery Monument at HydePark Corner, London, sculpted byCharles Sargeant Jagger. Of all your works, which is really special to you?

    The Korean War Memorial,which is a bronze statue of a British soldier, made by me. Its just round thecorner from the Houses of Parliamentbut the Gandhi sculpture is my first opposite the British Parliament. Can you tell us about the process ofsculpting Mahatma Gandhis image?

    Well, i wanted to get into the sculpture his compassion, his thought-fulness, courage and determination. Ittook me months of intensive work and iworked on it alone.

    The statue itself shows Gandhi ashe appeared in 1931, when he visitedLondon and then Prime Minister Ramsay MacDonald. So, it depictsGandhi in England. What does Mahatma Gandhi represent to you and many in the UK?

    I think Gandhi proved great thingscan be achieved without violence apowerful lesson for todays world.

    Placing Gandhi in ParliamentSquare is also a great compliment, agesture of friendship and affection towards India.

    It shows the esteem Mahatma Gandhi is held in by the people of Britain.

    Gandhi won great things without violence i wanted to depict his determined courage

    Q&A

    Much has been written aboutblessing, but something wedont think much about isblessing oneself. Earlier, it was thoughtthat only older people, teachers or gurus could give blessings. It has nowbecome more widely accepted that anyone can give or offer a blessing, spoken out or unspoken. While manynow are comfortable with blessing others, sharing the idea of blessingoneself always brings on thatWhaaaat? look whenever i mention it.

    The act of blessing whether forothers or oneself interrupts the habitual way we see, feel and thinkabout things, the shift allowing us toexperience things differently than wenormally would. One example that ifind inspiring is about a woman whotold me that she had to undergo surgery of her leg at a very young age.Many years later she began to havenightmares about not knowing what

    had been done to the limb that hadbeen removed during surgery. When i spoke of blessing oneself, she wondered if she could bless that partof her which was no longer there, andbegan to do so. As she did this not onlywas she able to first get in touch withher buried deep anger about not beingtold much about it by eitherparents or doctors, but shewas able to work through heremotions. The nightmaresstopped. And now she blessesher prosthesis each time sheuses it.

    Blessing oneself helpswhen you might be weigheddown by negative self-talk.So many people deplete theirenergy by constantly evaluat-ing, comparing and condemn-ing themselves or by being angry for things they have done orhave not done, or feeling like they arenot good enough.

    Whenever you bless something, it

    what you know, because of what youdont know. Bless what is and what hasto change in you or for you.

    Bless yourself for those you havehelped or inspired; some you may beaware of, some you may not. It hardlymatters if they bless you or not. Blessyour own good intentions.

    Bless yourself for what you havebeen open to learn; bless yourself forwhat you have taught. Bless what yousee as your failures, not just your successes. You might find you havelearnt more from the former than thelatter. Bless your needs and also yourgreeds! You are human after all.

    Bless your humanness, your intelligence and those moments youhave used it as well as those times youhave not. Bless your fears, at least you have acknowledged them, and cannow work on them. Bless your willing-ness to bless yourself, even if at firstyou thought it was a bit strange!

    Follow Marguerite Theophil atspeakingtree.in

    brings you into a state of love and gratitude. This changes your frame ofmind, perception and energy from anegative state to a more positive one.You can begin to shift a pattern ofcriticism and negative evaluation by blessing both the positive and nega-tive aspects and being grateful for who

    you are on a daily basis.You can bless your

    past, even if it has large chapters of pain or sorrow;it made you who you are to-day. Then when you clearlyand compassionately seehow you are today, that inturn will help shape you into who you want to be.

    Today, bless yourself forjust being you.

    Bless your own part inyour relationships, whether

    you consider them good or bad. This is how you are in the relationship because of circumstances, because ofresponses from the other, because of

    Feel Free To Shower Blessings On YourselfMarguerite Theophil

    thespeaking

    tree

    dilbert

    theysaidit

    This kind of political espionage and snooping

    into political opponents lifemay be Gujarat model but not Indian model

    Abhishek Singhvi

    Everyone says now thatwe have won Delhi we

    will win other states aswell. Are we aNapoleon on thevictory march?

    Why dont Britishers setup a statue in London of

    those who genuinelyfought against them, likeBhagat Singh, Azad, Rajguru, Bismil, etc.?

    Arvind Kejriwal

    Markandey Katju

    Winning isnt everything but wanting to win is

    VINCE LOMBARDI, US football player

    A thought for today