Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
THE MACRO-ECONOMICOUTLOOK FOR THE EUROAREA
Bank
ECB-RESTRICTED
Pavlos Karadeloglou
European Central Bank
Deputy HeadConvergence and Competitiveness Division
UN DESA Expert Group Meetingon the World Economy
October 21-23, 2015, New York
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
Outline
2
The three shocks supporting Euro Area activity1.
Impact of accommodative monetary policy2.
What drives the current pick-up?3.
4. The way forward
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©3
The three shocks supporting Euro Area activity1.
Impact of accommodative monetary policy2.
What drives the current pick-up?3.
4. The way forward
Outline
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
Shock 1: Low oil price: lower inflation / high real disposable income
4
Brent crude oil price developments
Source: Bloomberg. Last observation: September 2015.
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
Jan
-14
Feb
-14
Ma
r-14
Ap
r-1
4
Ma
y-1
4
Jun
-14
Jul-
14
Au
g-1
4
Sep
-14
Oct
-14
No
v-1
4
De
c-14
Jan
-15
Feb
-15
Ma
r-15
Ap
r-1
5
Ma
y-1
5
Jun
-15
Jul-
15
Au
g-1
5
Sep
-15
OIL (USD)
OIL (EUR)
Oil (USD) since Jun-14 - 57.8%Oil (EUR) since Jun-14 -48.8%
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©5
Shock 2: Improvement in price competitiveness
Decomposition of REER: nominal EER and relative CPI(Rebased August 2012=0, monthly data)
Source: ECB.Note: The last observations refer to September 2015. Relative CPI refers to the euro area CPI relative to the EER-20 groupof trading partners. An increase in EER indicates a worsening in price competitiveness.
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©6
Shock 3: Accommodative monetary policy
ECB interest rates and money market rates(percentages per annum; daily data)
Source: ECB. Last observation: October 6, 2015.
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Se
p.0
8
Ma
r.0
9
Se
p.0
9
Ma
r.1
0
Se
p.1
0
Ma
r.1
1
Se
p.1
1
Ma
r.1
2
Se
p.1
2
Ma
r.1
3
Se
p.1
3
Ma
r.1
4
Se
p.1
4
Ma
r.1
5
Se
p.1
5
Deposit rate MRO rate Marginal lending rate
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©7
The three shocks supporting Euro Area activity1.
Impact of accommodative monetary policy2.
What drives the current pick-up?3.
4. The way forward
Outline
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
ECB decisions since June 2014
8
• Cut in key ECB interest rates
• Targeted Longer-Term Refinancing Operations (TLTRO) to supportbank lending to households and non-financial corporations
• Purchase of non-financial private sector assetsstarting in October 2014:
ABS purchase program (ABSPP)
Covered bond purchase program
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©9
•ECB decisions since June 2014 II (January 2015)
• Purchase securities issued by euro area governments andagencies and European institutions in the secondary market
• Amount of purchases: €60 billion/month, intended to be carriedout until end-September 2016, or beyond, if necessary.
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
Impact of accommodative monetary policy I
10
• Market participants now expect EONIA to remain in the negative territory until September2018. This reflects expectations of higher future excess liquidity as a result of the APP purchases.
EONIA rate
(percentages per annum; daily data)
Source: ECB. Last observation: October 6, 2015.
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
Sep
.08
Mar.09
Sep
.09
Mar.10
Sep
.10
Mar.11
Sep
.11
Mar.12
Sep
.12
Mar.13
Sep
.13
Mar.14
Sep
.14
Mar.15
Sep
.15
EONIA
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
Impact of accommodative monetary policy II
II
11
• Bond yields in the euro area reached low levels.
10 –year government bond yields
Source: ECB. Last observation: October 6, 2015.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Jan.10 Jan.11 Jan.12 Jan.13 Jan.14 Jan.15
BE FR AT NL FI DE
Source: ECB. Last observation: October 6, 2015.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Jan.10 Jan.11 Jan.12 Jan.13 Jan.14 Jan.15
PT IE GR ES IT% %
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
Impact of accommodative monetary policy III
III
12
• The decline in market-based measures of inflation expectations stoppedand expectations recovered.
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
Impact of accommodative monetary policy IV
13
• There has been a continued strong performance in equity markets acrossEurope.
Equity market developments since APP announcement(index, daily data)
Source: ECB. Last observation: October 5, 2015.
1700
1750
1800
1850
1900
1950
2000
2050
2100
2150
2200
300305310315320325330335340345350355360365370375380385390395400
01-J
an-2
015
11-J
an-2
015
21-J
an-2
015
31-J
an-2
015
10-F
eb-2
015
20-F
eb-2
015
02-M
ar-2
015
12-M
ar-2
015
22-M
ar-2
015
01-A
pr-2
015
11-A
pr-2
015
21-A
pr-2
015
01-M
ay-2
015
11-M
ay-2
015
21-M
ay-2
015
31-M
ay-2
015
10-J
un-2
015
20-J
un-2
015
30-J
un-2
015
10-J
ul-2
015
20-J
ul-2
015
30-J
ul-2
015
09-A
ug-2
015
19-A
ug-2
015
29-A
ug-2
015
08-S
ep-2
015
18-S
ep-2
015
28-S
ep-2
015
Euro Stoxx (left axis)
S&P 500 (right axis)
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
Impact of accommodative monetary policy V
V
14
• Lending to euro zone households and firms rose for the first time in three yearsin March and continued its upward trend
Non-MFI excluding general government sector loans dynamics
(annual growth rate)
Source: ECB. Last observation: August, 2015.
-3.5
-3.0
-2.5
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
3/31
/201
2
6/30
/201
2
9/30
/201
2
12/3
1/20
12
3/31
/201
3
6/30
/201
3
9/30
/201
3
12/3
1/20
13
3/31
/201
4
6/30
/201
4
9/30
/201
4
12/3
1/20
14
3/31
/201
5
6/30
/201
5
Loans
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©15
The three shocks supporting Euro Area activity1.
Impact of accommodative monetary policy2.
What drives the current pick-up?3.
4. The way forward
Outline
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
In line with our expectations, the recovery is re-gaining momentum.
16
(quaerterly percentage changes, index and percentage balance)
Source: Markit, DG-ECFIN, Eurostat and ECB Staff calculations. Last observation September 2015.
Composite PMI, Economic sentiment and consumer confidence.
-0.5
-0.3
-0.1
0.1
0.3
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.5
45
47
49
51
53
55
57
59
61
63
65
2010Q1
Q2 Q3 Q4 2011Q1
Q2 Q3 Q4 2012Q1
Q2 Q3 Q4 2013Q1
Q2 Q3 Q4 2014Q1
Q2 Q3 Q4 2015Q1
Q2 Q3
Real GDP (rhs) September 2015 MPE (rhs) ESI (lhs) Composite PMI (lhs)
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
It is mainly consumption based
17
EA Private consumption(annual percentage changes)
Source: Eurostat and ECB Staff
calculations. Last observation: Q2 2015.
-3
-1
1
3
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Total private consumption Real disposable income
EA durable and non-durable consumption(annual percentage changes)
Source: Eurostat and ECB Staff calculations. Last
observation: Q2 2015.
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Durables Non-durables and services
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©18
Sources: Eurostat and ECB calculations.Note: The horizontal lines refer to the respective pre-crisis averages. Last data: 2015Q2 for income and other factors, 2015Q3for energy.
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
Euro area headline inflation and inflation excluding food and energy(annual growth rates)
Sources: Eurostat and September 2015 ECB staff macroeconomic projections.Latest observation: September 2015 (Flash estimate).
Recent HICP developments ECB-SECRET
19
Projections
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©20
The recovery is historically slow, but gaining momentum
Sources: Eurostat, AWM database and ECB calculations.Notes: Q refers to the troughs as defined by the CEPR Euro Area Business Cycle Dating Committee.
Euro area recoveries(index: trough = 100)
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©21
The three shocks supporting Euro Area activity1.
Impact of accommodative monetary policy2.
What drives the current pick-up?3.
4. The way forward
Outline
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
Where do we stand, where should we go?
22
• The pick-up in recovery is partly triggered by exogenous factors (Oilprices, weaker euro and accommodative monetary policy)…
• …rather than endogenous factors that could underpin a self-sustainedrecovery
• We still have low investment, high unemployment, low potential growthand negative external risks (slowdown in EMEs, influx of refugees)
• What happens in the long run?
• High unemployment to be reduced needs higher potential growth.
• Main objective: structural reforms to increase total factor productivity
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
In FR, wage-productivity links are weak
Source: Authors calculations based on CompNet database
Note: The graphs show the evolution of the median labour compensations per worker among the least productive firms (firms at the bottom of the labourproductivity distribution) and most productive firms (firms at the top of the labour productivity distribution)
Median labour compensation perworker (2003=1)
Median labour compensation per worker(2003=1)
•In FR, compensation per employee for both leastand most productive firms grew at the same rate
•…In DE, we observe• instead wage dispersion
23
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
Source: Authors calculations based on CompNet 20E database
Median labour compensations per employee andlabour productivity (2003=1)
Median labour compensation, minimum wagegrowth, and CPI (2003=1)
In FR, wages and productivity links are weak
•…This affects the competitiveness of theFrench economy
24
•Minimum wages and rigidity in bargainingprocess may be distortionary
• Negotiated wage increases are correlated withminimum wage increases (Avouyi-Dovi et al, 2013)
• Minimum wage indexation (based on past inflation)mechanism may be distortionary when times are notstable.
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
Micro and small firms backbone of Italy’s productive system
… generating more than 60% of total employment
Size matter for productivity
Source: COMPNET. Manufacturing sector
25
More than 95% of productivestructure of the country …
Source: Criscuolo, Gal, Menon (2014)
Share of firms of differentsize by country
Size classes*1: 1-9 employees*2: 10-19 employees*3: 20-49 employees*4: 50-249 employees*5: ≥ 250 employees
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
Most new firms are born small, but in Italy they do not grow
26
Source: Criscuolo, Gal, Menon (2014)Sector coverage: manufacturing, construction, and non financial business services.
Average size of start-up and old firms across industries and across countries
Manufacturing Services
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
When French firms reach the 50 employee threshold, they need to:
1. set up a “works council” with minimum budget of 0.3% of total payroll
2. establish a committee on health, safety and working conditions
3. appoint a union representative (i.e. not simply a local representative of the firm’s workers) ifwanted by workers
4. establish a profit sharing plan
5. incur higher liability in case of a workplace accident
6. report monthly and in detail all labor contracts to the government
7. undertake a formal “Professional assessment” for each worker older than 45.
8.Firing costs increase substantially in the case of collective dismissals of 10 or more workers(implicit tax on firm size which makes firms reluctant to hire)
• The burden of French labor legislation increases when firms employ 50 workers
27
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©28
Reserve slides
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©29
It is mainly consumption based.
Consumer confidence indicator
Source: EC. Last observation: September 2015.
-55
-50
-45
-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
Jan-
08
Jan-
09
Jan-
10
Jan-
11
Jan-
12
Jan-
13
Jan-
14
Jan-
15
EA DE FR IT ES
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
Euro’s appreciating trend is reversed
30
EURUSD real exchange rate and EUR real effectiveexchange rate(CPI-deflated; monthly data)
Source: ECB.Note: The latest observation refers to September 2015. NEER-38 and EURUSD are indices (1999Q1=100).
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©31
Deviations from the 1980-2015 average, CPI-deflatedbilateral and effective rates(monthly data)
Source: ECB, BIS.Note: Last observation refers to September 2015 for EER-12 and EER-38 and all bilateral exchange rates andAugust 2015 for USD, JPY, GBP and CHF of the effective exchange rates. For EER-38 data was only available from1993. A negative number indicates a depreciation.
Based on EER-39, euro close to its long term average value
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©32
The euro area has partially regained price competitiveness
Real effective exchange rate(Indexed to the 1995-2013 average, quarterly data)
Source: ECB.Note: Last observation June 2015. For CPI, ULCT and GDP the EER-19 and for ULCM the EER-18 is the group of tradingpartners. An increase indicates a worsening in price competitiveness.
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
Source: Garicano et al, 2013.
•The size distribution is distorted - “too many” firms just below the 50 employee-size-threshold and “too few” firms just above it
•Size related regulations may explain this distortion
The size distribution in FR has a discrete jump at around 50 employees
33
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
When French firms reach the 50 employee threshold, they need to:
1. set up a “works council” with minimum budget of 0.3% of total payroll
2. establish a committee on health, safety and working conditions
3. appoint a union representative (i.e. not simply a local representative of the firm’s workers) ifwanted by workers
4. establish a profit sharing plan
5. incur higher liability in case of a workplace accident
6. report monthly and in detail all labor contracts to the government
7. undertake a formal “Professional assessment” for each worker older than 45.
8.Firing costs increase substantially in the case of collective dismissals of 10 or more workers(implicit tax on firm size which makes firms reluctant to hire)
• The burden of French labor legislation increases when firms employ 50 workers
34
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
FR-Q3: Why did France lose price competitiveness?
Wage developments have not been in line with productivitydevelopments.
Industry level bargaining system and the minimum wageindexation mechanism can lead to a discrepancy betweenproductivity and wage developments, particularly in unstable times.
35
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
0 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 1share of exporters
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
average 2001-2012
share of exporters by deciles of tfp
Exporting firms tend to be concentrated among the most productive and largest firms
Size classes*1: 1-9 employees*2: 10-19 employees*3: 20-49 employees*4: 50-249 employees*5: ≥ 250 employees
Source: COMPNETNote: manufacturing sector Unless otherwise indicated, the sample includes all firms with at least one employee.
36
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
Why firms do not grow? Ownership structure vs. policy features
• Entrepreneurship model:
Family ownership (Michelacci-Schivardi, 2008; Pellegrino-Zingales2014; Bugamelli et al. 2014)
• Size-contingent regulations may distort the firm size distribution (Garicano etal. 2013; Guner et al. 2008):
Labour regulation:
o (EPL – threshold at 15 employees?)
o Difficult for firms to reorganise in order to exploit newtechnologies?
Fiscal regime and accounting requirements
Access to finance venture capital
37
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
Unemployment remains high but is improving
Source: Eurostat.Latest data: August 2015.
38
Euro area unemployment(% of labour force)
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
Aim:
•Address persistent weakness in bank lending and hence restore monetary policytransmission
•Provide long-term funding at attractive terms and conditions
Main Features:
•8 operations until 2016
•Initial allowance: 7% of MFI’s outstanding amount of loans to euro area non-financial private sector (households and non-financial corporations excluding loansfor house purchase) in 2 operations (18/09/14 and 11/12/14)
•Additional allowance: net lending in excess of benchmark, with a multiplier of 3
•Fixed rate: prevailing MRO at the time of the tender announcement + 10 bps
•Same set of collateral as regular operations
•Forced repayments if lending up to 30 April 2016 is below the benchmark, to payback in September 2016
•All TLTROs will mature in September 2018, i.e. in around 4 years.
June – September ECB decisions: Targeted LTROs
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
• Take-up EUR 82.6 bn within range ofstaff estimates. Market expectationsunduly high.
• 40% of initial allowance of EUR 206.7 bn
• EUR 49 bn net liquidity injection
• 225 bidders representing 738 creditinstitutions out of 382 eligible biddersrepresenting 1,372 credit institutions
• 55% of allotment to institutions that donot take recurrent recourse to ECBoperations
40
June – September ECB Decisions: results of first Targeted LTRO
3746
80
173
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
Recurrent Non-recurrent
Bid amount Number of bidders
Bid amount and number of bidders byrecurrent vs. non-recurrent bidders
(bid amount in € billion)
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©41
• ABS purchase programme (ABSPP) - broad portfolio of simple and transparentasset-backed securities with underlying assets consisting of claims against the euroarea non-financial private sector: to strengthen direct pass-through effect
• Portfolio rebalancing channel
• Underpins Forward Guidance
• Covered bond purchase programme (CBPP3): Broad portfolio of euro-denominatedcovered bonds issued by MFIs domiciled in the euro area.
will further complement the TLTROs and ABSPP
further support to lending (tight link between covered bonds and loans that backthem)
banks to respond by originating more covered bonds – hence more loans tocollateralise them
June – September ECB decisions: Private Asset Purchase Programmes
Private asset purchase programmes to empower TLTRO
credit easing impact
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
“The newly decided measures, together with the [TLTROs], will have a
sizeable impact on our balance sheet.” “The [ … ] aim is to steer,
significantly steer, the size of our balance sheet towards the dimensions
it used to have at the beginning of 2012.”
42
June – September ECB decisions: impact on balance sheet
• (Size of) balance sheet not
an aim in itself
• Instrumental in reducing
uncertainty around
effectiveness of measures:
Transmission potential
per extra euro of
liquidity created
Overall amount of
liquidity created
Rubric
www.ecb.europa.eu ©
…but divergences at a country level
43
Developments in HCIs(ULCT-based, including intra- and extra-trade; percent change between 1999Q1 and 2015Q2)
Source: ECB.Note: For single countries the REER-19 plus the Euro area is the group of trading partners, For the Euro area the REER-19is used. A negative value indicates an increase in price or cost competitiveness. Latest observation 2015Q2.