140129_Aki_NIER_ONTARIO_Distr

“School Evaluation System” in Japan

@Ontario Ministry of EducationContact info: Akihiko HASHIMOTO [email protected]

Akihiko Hashimoto, Senior Researcher

National Institute for Educational Policy Research of Japan (Department for Educational Policy and Evaluation Research)

Wednesday, Jan 29, 3:00 PM or later

1. AKI

1. Aki

1. AKI

National Institute for Educational Policy Research of Japan

Founded : 1949Last major restructuring : 2001Full time staffs (apprx.) : 150 (incl. 100 Rs&Sp)Location : In the MEXT building (2008-)Ministry of Edu, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology

More Info : Google “NIER” “Japan”Contact info: Akihiko HASHIMOTO [email protected]

1. AKI

National Institute for Educational Policy Research of Japan

“Department for Educational Policy and Evaluation Research”

WATANABE Keiko, Director (Ed. Governance)HASHIMOTO Akihiko (History of Evaluation)HONDA Masato (Ed. Administration)YASHIKI Kazuyoshi (School Architecture)UEDA Midori (Ed. Administration)SENOH Wataru (Ed. Finance)MIYAZAKI Satoru (Ed. Finance)

History of Evaluation(Pre-modern)1. AKI

“Koji Ruien”

1. AKI

Aki’s short biographyBeehive Kindergarten (Queens, N.Y.) PreK & KPS 120 (Queens, N.Y.) Grade 1-2Shijonawate Gakuen Elem. (Osaka) G 3-6Shijonawate Gakuen Junior HS (Osaka) G 7-9Shijonawate HS (Osaka) 10-12Hiroshima University (Education) UG 1-4Hiroshima University Grad Sch. (Ed.) DC 1-5

Hiroshima University (Res. As.) NIER (1987-)

2. School evaluation in JP

2. “School Evaluation System” in Japan

Source: National Institute of Population and Social Security Research

15U16.5K32Y↓WHO60


School System

School Education Law (1947)

Single track system（ K- ６ - ３ - ３

+Colleges ）9 yrs. compulsory ed.（ sch. age based promo ）

Gratis compulsory ed.


Policy Evaluation・ June 2001, 　 Government

Policy Evaluations Act. was enacted.

・ In the MEXT, (Ministry for Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology)

- ‘Performance Evaluation’- ‘Project Evaluation’ - ‘Program Evaluation’ should be done as policy evaluation.

Ca20

Cent.Ag.


“R.I. for Ed.” Evaluation・ National : National Institute

for Educational Policy Research.

・ Prefectural : among those 47 Prefectures, 20 Special Cities, 1742 City/Town/Villages

Almost 300

Institutes


BoEd Evaluation・ June 2007, 　 Law Concerning

Organization and Functions of Local Educational Administration. was amended.

・ Board of Education ; 47 Prefectures, 20 Special Cities, 1742 City/Town/Villages

Almost 1800

Board of Ed.


School Evaluation・ June 2007, 　 School

Education Law . was amended. ・ Schools; Public+Private (aprx. in

2008FY) Elem. (1-6) 22,200 + 200 Low-Sec. (7-9) 10,200+700 Hi-Sch.(10-12) 4,000+1,300 Spec-Ed. (K-12) 1,000

Almost

40,000 Schools.


To Sum Up 20 300 1,800+ 40,000 42,120 public educational organizations

became to be evaluated


Purpose of School Evaluation

　①　 school improvement 　 through ＰＤＣＡ cycle

　　　②　 assuring accountability 　

partnership with parents, guardians and community residents ↓

Quality Assuranceof Education

The Three Storage Model of School Evaluation System

(1) Self-evaluation - Under the leadership of the principal, done by all school staffs.- School Objectives, School Plans and other plans are to be referred.

(2) Evaluations of persons concerned with schools- Consists of guardians, PTA members, School Council members, community

members, people concerned with articulated schools, etc. - Evaluation done based on the results of self-evaluation

(3) Third party evaluation- Consists of experts not directly connected to the subject school, etc. - Objective, specialized evaluation

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　

Extracted from: School Evaluation Guidelines , July

22nd, 2010.

Versions of 2006 Mar., 2008 Jan., 2010 Jul.

Implementation of the School Evaluation System (1)

Distribution of the School Evaluation Guidelines　


Commissioned researches on school evaluation　1. Techniques of third party evaluation /

Training of evaluators （ 2006 ）2. Techniques of third party evaluation / Utilization towards school improvement support (2007)3. Information system for evaluation (2007)4. Techniques of third party evaluation (2009)5. Training of evaluators for evaluations of persons concerned with schools (2009)6. Evaluation in Kindergartens (2009)7. Techniques of school evaluation (2010)

Trial researches for third party evaluation 　

1. MEXT supervised type (2006-’09 ）

……310 schools2. NIER supervised type (’07 ) …… 25 schools3. Prefecture supervised type

(’07-’09) ( designated cities included) ……233 schools


From School News of Kurihara-kita Elem. Sch. of Hiroshima Pref. （ Kengo ISHIDA, 2009 ）

parents’manner:11%=’NG’

teachers’instruction:7%=’NG’

kids’ marchingin spirit/order:5%=’NG’

teachers’action quick:5%=’NG’

kids’ talked much about the ivent:8 %=’NG’

Methods for School Evaluation ①

Reporting result of a Questionnaire SurveyTo Parents　

A portion of theSelf-evaluationChecklist →

Also available for the ‘Evaluations of persons concerned with schools ‘ and‘ Third party evaluation’

　平成 20 年度「学校の第三者評価試行事業」

学校評価事前記入シート

【共通領域：学校運営の状況】

評価希望

観　点

概況 ( 当てはまる項目に○を記入）

とても当てはまる

どちらかというと当て

はまる

どちらかというと当てはまらない

全く当てはまらない

▼ 　 ▼ 　 ▼ 　 ▼ 　

＜項目：学校の組織運営の状況＞　　　　　　　　　　　　

　校長など管理職は、教育目標等の達成に向けて、適切にリーダーシップを発揮しているか

1 - 2 - 3 - 4 　

　校長など管理職は、他の教職員から信頼を得ているか 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 　　校務分掌や主任制が適切に機能するなど、学校の運営・責任体制が整備されているか 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 　　職員会議等が適切に運営されているか 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 　　勤務時間管理や職専免研修の承認状況等、服務監督が適切に行われているか 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 　

　県費、市費など学校が管理する資金の経理（資金の管理、会計報告、監査等）が適切に行われているか

1 - 2 - 3 - 4 　

　各種文書や個人情報等の学校が保有する情報が適切に管理され、教職員に情報の取扱方針が周知されているか

1 - 2 - 3 - 4 　

＜項目：学校と設置者の連携の状況＞　　　　　　　　　　　　

　設置者が明確な教育方針等を示し、それに基づいて学校運営や教育活動を行うよう指導しているか

1 - 2 - 3 - 4 　

　設置者の示す明確な教育方針等に基づいて教育目標が設定されているか 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 　

　設置者の示す明確な教育方針等に基づいて学校運営や教育活動が行われているか 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 　

　学校の裁量により執行できる予算の措置など、学校の裁量を高め、学校が自ら改善策を講じやすくする工夫がなされているか

1 - 2 - 3 - 4 　

　学校と設置者が、児童生徒の状況（学力等の状況や問題行動等）や安全管理等（不審者情報等）に関する情報を適切に共有しているか

1 - 2 - 3 - 4 　

　学校が課題と考える事項について設置者と共通理解が図られているか 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 　

　学校と設置者が連携し、学校の情報化が適切になされているか 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 　

　学校と設置者が連携し、教材・教具・図書の整備が適切になされているか 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 　＜項目：目標設定と自己評価の状況＞　　　　　　　　　　　　

　学校は、児童生徒や学校の実態、保護者や地域の意見・要望等を踏まえて教育目標を設定しているか

1 - 2 - 3 - 4 　

　学校の状況を踏まえ重点化された中期または短期の目標が定められているか 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 　

Methods for School Evaluation ②

Checklist sheets of school activities 　

Methods for School

Evaluation ③ 　

　

School visitVisitation by NIER　

Teaching evaluation sheet, used in Nagano Prefecture Board of Education →

Methods for School

Evaluation ④ 　

Teaching evaluation 　

Character of Modern Japanese

School Evaluation ( 学校評価 )～ Compared to traditional

‘reflection’meetings (‘ 反省会’ ) ～A : Requires objective data and

reasonsB : Pressures to yield 'Actions'

or improvementsC : May involve broad sort of

people and open to the public

Column: Other Evaluation:

“National Assessment of Academic Ability”

National Assessment of Academic Ability 　①

[Objectives of the assessment]

• To verify the results of education and education measures,

　　 identify associated problems, and implement necessary improvements.

• To establish a sustainable cycle of Check-Act in education.

• To improve the teaching and children’s situation for learning.

National Assessment of Academic Ability 　②

[Graders assessed in 2007]

- Sampled or volunteering children

-- 6th graders (25.3 % of all school numbers were sampled)

-- 9th graders (41.5 % of all school numbers were sampled)

70-80%

National Assessment of Academic Ability 　③

[Contents of assessment]- School subjects (‘knowledge’

& ‘use’)-- Japanese A,

arithmetic/mathematics A-- Japanese B,

arithmetic/mathematics B

- Questionnaire survey concerning lifestyle habits and learning environment

-- Student survey-- School survey

Documents

140129_Aki_NIER_ONTARIO_Distr