Upload
azalia-kemp
View
30
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
COTO Road Materials Committee (RMC) Management of Industry Documentation Road Pavement Forum 6 & 7 May 2008 Rob Lindsay. 14 th RPF Resolution #6. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
COTO Road Materials Committee COTO Road Materials Committee (RMC)(RMC)
Management of Industry Management of Industry DocumentationDocumentation
Road Pavement ForumRoad Pavement Forum6 & 7 May 20086 & 7 May 2008
Rob LindsayRob Lindsay
14 th RPF Resolution #614 th RPF Resolution #6
““That an RPF task group be That an RPF task group be established under the leadership of established under the leadership of Elzbieta Sadzik and Rob Lindsay to Elzbieta Sadzik and Rob Lindsay to discuss a new structure and a way discuss a new structure and a way
forward for the COTO Road Materials forward for the COTO Road Materials Committee.”Committee.”
COTO Technical SubcommitteesCOTO Technical Subcommittees
Historic MandateHistoric Mandate
Facilitate technology transfer amongst Facilitate technology transfer amongst road authoritiesroad authorities
Collate state of the art technology and Collate state of the art technology and practicepractice
Develop national standardsDevelop national standards Produce / revise relevant TRH and TMHProduce / revise relevant TRH and TMH
(E Sadzik)(E Sadzik)
RPF Task GroupRPF Task Group
Workshop on 18 February 2008Workshop on 18 February 2008 PresentPresent
E SadzikE Sadzik M HendersonM Henderson B VerhaegheB Verhaeghe I McDonaldI McDonald L SampsonL Sampson T DistinT Distin L KannemeyerL Kannemeyer R LindsayR Lindsay
RPF Task GroupRPF Task Group
Workshop AgendaWorkshop Agenda
Problem StatementProblem Statement RMC functionsRMC functions Membership of RMCMembership of RMC RCB Task Group proposed COTO RCB Task Group proposed COTO
structurestructure Road Engineering AcademyRoad Engineering Academy Austroads and AASHTO approachAustroads and AASHTO approach RMC – the futureRMC – the future
RPF Task GroupRPF Task Group
Discussion (Industry Documentation)Discussion (Industry Documentation)
RMC mandate implicitly withdrawnRMC mandate implicitly withdrawn No vertical integration (RCC and COTO)No vertical integration (RCC and COTO) Difficulty with national fundingDifficulty with national funding Absence of approval mechanismAbsence of approval mechanism
Aggravating factorsAggravating factors Diminishing expertise in the State Road Diminishing expertise in the State Road
AuthoritiesAuthorities MTC and RNMSMTC and RNMS
RPF Task GroupRPF Task Group
Proposal (Industry Documentation)Proposal (Industry Documentation) Support Formation of RECBSupport Formation of RECB Transfer RMC document mandate to RECBTransfer RMC document mandate to RECB
Vertical integration (RCB and/or COTO)Vertical integration (RCB and/or COTO) RECB compete for funding from DSTRECB compete for funding from DST Broad representationBroad representation
Private and public sectorsPrivate and public sectors Special Interest Groups (RMC)Special Interest Groups (RMC)
State, Metro, and Local AuthoritiesState, Metro, and Local Authorities Approval mechanism?Approval mechanism?
RPF Task GroupRPF Task Group
Proposal (Industry Documentation)Proposal (Industry Documentation)
RCC technical disciplines accommodatedRCC technical disciplines accommodated Road Prism, Pavement Layers, Minor Structures, Road Prism, Pavement Layers, Minor Structures,
Geometric Design.Geometric Design.
RCC technical disciplines not RCC technical disciplines not accommodatedaccommodated
Road Network Management, Major Structures, Survey, Road Network Management, Major Structures, Survey, Construction.Construction.