Upload
phamkhanh
View
218
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
12340 Global Warming Science Geoengineering
Dan Cziczo Thursday May 10 2012
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the firstimage on page httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
1
ONLINE SUBJECT EVALUATIONS
ARE NOW OPEN
httpwebmitedusubjectevaluation bull You have until Monday May 21 at 9 AM bull Please evaluate all subjects in your list bull Write comments
Your feedback is read and valued 2
ldquoGeoengineeringrdquo History Weather modification - The changing of natural weather phenomena by technical means for example through the microscale of condensation and freezing nuclei Terraforming - transform (a planet) so as to resemble the earth especially so that it can support human life (Oxford Dictionaries normally attributed to Jack Williamson Collision Orbitrdquo (1942) although many similarities to HG Wells ldquoThe War of the Worldsrdquo (1898)) Geoengineering - the deliberate large-scale manipulation of an environmental process that affects the earthrsquos climate in an attempt to counteract the effects of global warming (Oxford Dictionaries) Generally attributed to Paul Crutzen (2006) but several earlier works
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the firstimage on page httpwwwerbzinecommag14marsterrjpg
httpwwwerbzinecommag14marsterrjpg3
Weather Modification History
Initial attempts at weather modification were of limited successhellip
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the secondimage on httpwwwdesertusacommag07janimagesinstonehtml
4
Hail Cannon (1901)
Cloud Seeding
Lest you think this was a long time agohellip
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see thefirst image on page httpwwwsacreddestinationscomfranceanzy-le-duc-church
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see thefirst image on page httpwwwabsurdintellectualcom20090622all-hail-the-hail-cannons
5
Lest you think this was a long time agohellip
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Pleasesee the image on page httpwwwhailcannoncompictureshtml
6
The lsquoModernrsquo Age of Weather Mod Mid-1940rsquos Generally considered to have grown out of the WWII contrail research The pioneers Vincent Shaefer Irving Langmuir and Bernie Vonnegut at GE Showed that particles with water-ice structure could effectively nucleate ice at temperature near 0deg C
This image (published on the Journal of Meteorology by the AmericanMeteorological Society) is copyright copy AMS and used with permission
103
102
101
100
102
103
104
105
106
Temperature (C)Fr
eezi
ng n
ucle
i per
gra
m P
bO
01m NH4 I
PbO
PbO + 01m NH4 I
PbI2
Freezing nucleus activity of the preparations as a function of temperature
-30-25-20-15-10-50
PbO + 001m NH4 I
10-1
Free
zing
nuc
lei p
er c
m3
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
7
National Academy of Science 2003 Last comprehensive report on weather modification
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpwwwnapeducatalogphprecord_id=10829
8
The lsquoModernrsquo Age of Weather Mod
Early ldquodemonstrationsrdquo with clouds were mixed increased glaciation was observed but little or no enhanced precipitations (clouds contained too little water) ldquoNeed for impartial assessmentrdquo recognized as early as 1957 ldquoDouble blindrdquo studies suggested 1957 1963 (ldquohellipit has not been demonstrated that precipitation hellip can be increased significantly by seedinghelliprdquo) 1973 (ldquoice-nuclei seeding can sometimes lead to more precipitation can sometimes lead to less precipitation and at other times hellip have no effecthelliprdquo) 2003 (ldquohellipour Committee finds little reason to differ from these findingshelliprdquo) Point Theory itself does not show if a technique works when multiple steps are involved (in this case initiation not growth and precipitation) Further the scale of the experiment (lab versus isolated cloud versus system) often leads to different results
9
ldquoBy far the preferred way to resolve the policy makersrsquo dilemma is to lower the emissions of the greenhouse gasesrdquo ldquoTherefore although by far not the best solution the usefulness of artificially enhancing earthrsquos albedo and thereby cooling climate by adding sunlight reflecting aerosol in the stratosphere (Budyko 1977 NAS 1992) might again be explored and debatedhelliprdquo ldquoFinally I repeat the very best would be if emissions of the greenhouse gases could be reduced so much that the stratospheric sulfur release experiment would not need to take place Currently this looks like a pious wishrdquo
10
Budyko M I 1977 lsquoClimatic Changes American Geophysical Societyrsquo Washington DC 244 pp Bodansky D 1996 lsquoMay we engineer the climatersquo Clim Change 33 309ndash321 Dickinson R E 1996 lsquoClimate Engineering A review of aerosol approaches to changing the global energy balancersquo Clim Change 33 279ndash290 Jamieson D 1996 lsquoEthics and intentional climate changersquo Clim Change 33 323 336 Schneider S H 1996 lsquoGeoengineering Could-or-Should-we do itrsquo Clim Change 33 291ndash302 Keith D W 2000 lsquoGeoengineering the climate History and prospectrsquo Annu Rev Energy Environ 25 245ndash284 National Academy of Sciences (NAS) 1992 Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming Mitigation Adaptation and the Science Base Panel on Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy National Academy Press Washington DC 918 pp
Early Referenceshellip
11
ldquoThe climatic changes that may be produced by the increased CO2 content could be
deleterious from the point of view of human beings The possibilities of deliberately bringing about countervailing climatic
changes therefore need to be thoroughly explored A change in the radiation balance
in the opposite direction to that which might result from the increase of
atmospheric CO2 could be produced by raising the albedo or reflectivity of the earth Such a change in albedo could be
brought about for example by spreading very small reflecting particles over large
oceanic areasrdquo
hellipBut Not The Earliest
12
Source New Scientist
Reduction of Solar Radiation Higher Albedo
Carbon Capture
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpwwwnextnaturenet201002nine-geoengineering-strategies
13
Albedo Increase Solar Mitigation
Archer 2007
(1 - α)lsolar
4
Earth
Boundary to space
lup atmosphere
ldown atmospherelup ground
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
14
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpscommonswikimediaorgwikiFileAlbedo-e_hgsvg
Simple Albedo Increase
Courtesy Jimmy Gasore Haider et al 1997
Necessary square footage gtgt available square footage
Image courtesy of nycgov
15
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Naturersquos Examples Direct Effect
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 6 on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
16
Climate Model Response
IPCC 2007 Models
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 95 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
17
Pinatubo ~15 Tg SO2 into the stratosphere
Natural Version of the Direct Effect Method
Robock 1998
Image courtesy of USGS
Image courtesy of NASA
18
Global temperatures dropped by 04-06degC after
Pinatubo Particle layer persisted for 3
years (e-folding ~1 year)
IPCC 2001 Houghton J TY Ding D J Griggs M Noguer P J van der Linden X Dai K Maskell andC A Johnson (eds) Climate Change 2001 The Scientific Basis Contribution of WorkingGroup I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange Cambridge UK Cambridge University Press Used with permission
Wm
2
El ChichonMt Pinatubo
540
520
500
480
460
440
420
400
380
360
34001978
1978
1980 1982
1982
1984 1986 1988 1990
1991
1992 1994 1996 1998
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
19
The Direct Effect Method
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
Say we want to ldquooffsetrdquo current ~075deg C warming Pinatubo was ~15 Tg SO2 injection Some variation of initial injection of ~20 Tg sulfuric acid and then an increasing yearly amount of 10+ Tg Aircraft balloon and other lsquodesignsrsquo (25km tethered hose) proposed
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the third image on page httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
20
The Indirect Effect Method
IPCC 2007
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 210 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
21
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Anthropogenic Example
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 6on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
22
NASA January 27 2003 Atlantic France Spain
from D Rosenfeld Image courtesy of Danniel Rosenfeld Used with permission
Image courtesy of NASA
23
Stephen Salterrsquos design
US Navy
Unpublished results use of particle production in Marine Boundary Layer (MBL) with cloud formation ~1 in 10 times
Image courtesy of US Navy
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpphysicsworldcomcwsarticlenews356931cloud
24
Reward Risk 1 Cool planet 1 Regional droughts 2 Reduce or reverse ice loss 2 Continued ocean acidification 3 Reduce or reverse sea level rise 3 Ozone depletion 4 Increase plant productivity 4 Diffuse radiation effect on plants 5 Nice sunsets 5 Acid deposition 6 Better precipitation control 6 Cirrus effects
7 White skies 8 Lower solar power margins 9 Environmental side effects 10 Cannot stop effects quickly (1-3 years or more) 11 Rapid warming if stopped (all effects back in 1-3 years) 12 Human error 13 Undermining mitigation efforts 14 Cost 15 Who controls Commercialization 16 Military use 17 Whose hand on the thermostat 18 Conflict with treaties 19 ldquoUnknown unknownsrdquo
Robock 2008
What would you propose as a method 1 Model all results first
2 Small scale tests For direct effect method how do you do this 3 Are there effects that canrsquot be accepted
Risk vs Reward
25
As with the example of cheaper natural gas the ldquostop gaprdquo makes a possible ldquolong term solutionrdquo much less likely
Sunlight measured at Mauna Loa The reduction in direct sunlight and increase in diffuse sunlight following the eruption of Mt Pinatuboin 1991 are readily apparent The reduction in total sunlight was much smaller
500
400
300
200
100
1990 1992 1994 1996 19980
Direct
Total
Year
Mau
na L
oa S
olar
Rad
iatio
n (W
m-1
)
100 700
600
500
400
300
200
100
80
60
40
20
0
Annual solar output
Summer on-peak capacity
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998
Year
SEG
S O
n-Pe
ak S
umm
er
Cap
acity
(
)
SEG
S G
ross
Sol
ar
Out
put
(CW
h)
Output of the solar electric generating systems (SEGS) solar thermalpower plants in California (data are from ref 9) The SEGS plants had significant reductions in on-peak capacity and total output following the eruption of Mt Pinatubo
Diffuse
A
B
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
Effect of Stratospheric Aerosols on Direct Sunlight and Implications for Concentrating Solar Power
DANIEL M MURPHYEarth system research laboratory Chemical sciences division National oceanic and atmospheric administration 325 Broadway Boulder Colorado 80305
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
26
Summer sea ice
goes away with a
doubling of CO2
Ice returns with
geoengineering
(but not
homogeneously)
It is possible to
overdo the effect
Rasch et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see Figure 2 in httpiopscienceioporg1748-932644045112fulltext
27
Model 2 (NASA GISS)
Model 1 (Hadley)
Jones et al 2010
Precipitation change from stratospheric sulfate
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 4in httpwwwatmos-chem-physnet1059992010acp-10-5999-2010pdf
28
Precipitation change from marine cloud seeding
Jones et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure4 in httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292008JD011450full
29
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
30
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
This image (published on the Journal of AtmosphericSciences by the American Meteorological Society) iscopyright copy AMS and used with permission
31
Baseline With Geoengineering
Rasch et al 2008
Ethics in research when do you decide to stop researching a topic because the result is too negative When does ldquowe should know more about it in case we try itrdquo conflict with ldquothis is not a good ideardquo
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 8 in httpclimateenvscirutgersedupdfRaschPhilTranspdf
32
ldquoConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniquesrdquo (ENMOD) prohibits the use of the environment as a weapon A result of opposition to Agent Orange and weather modification during Vietnam Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1976 and opened for signature on 18 May 1977 ENMOD entered into force when Laos the twentieth State Party deposited its instrument of ratification on 5 October 1978
Map wikipedia 33
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpenwikipediaorgwikiFileENMOD_Participationsvg
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms
ONLINE SUBJECT EVALUATIONS
ARE NOW OPEN
httpwebmitedusubjectevaluation bull You have until Monday May 21 at 9 AM bull Please evaluate all subjects in your list bull Write comments
Your feedback is read and valued 2
ldquoGeoengineeringrdquo History Weather modification - The changing of natural weather phenomena by technical means for example through the microscale of condensation and freezing nuclei Terraforming - transform (a planet) so as to resemble the earth especially so that it can support human life (Oxford Dictionaries normally attributed to Jack Williamson Collision Orbitrdquo (1942) although many similarities to HG Wells ldquoThe War of the Worldsrdquo (1898)) Geoengineering - the deliberate large-scale manipulation of an environmental process that affects the earthrsquos climate in an attempt to counteract the effects of global warming (Oxford Dictionaries) Generally attributed to Paul Crutzen (2006) but several earlier works
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the firstimage on page httpwwwerbzinecommag14marsterrjpg
httpwwwerbzinecommag14marsterrjpg3
Weather Modification History
Initial attempts at weather modification were of limited successhellip
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the secondimage on httpwwwdesertusacommag07janimagesinstonehtml
4
Hail Cannon (1901)
Cloud Seeding
Lest you think this was a long time agohellip
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see thefirst image on page httpwwwsacreddestinationscomfranceanzy-le-duc-church
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see thefirst image on page httpwwwabsurdintellectualcom20090622all-hail-the-hail-cannons
5
Lest you think this was a long time agohellip
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Pleasesee the image on page httpwwwhailcannoncompictureshtml
6
The lsquoModernrsquo Age of Weather Mod Mid-1940rsquos Generally considered to have grown out of the WWII contrail research The pioneers Vincent Shaefer Irving Langmuir and Bernie Vonnegut at GE Showed that particles with water-ice structure could effectively nucleate ice at temperature near 0deg C
This image (published on the Journal of Meteorology by the AmericanMeteorological Society) is copyright copy AMS and used with permission
103
102
101
100
102
103
104
105
106
Temperature (C)Fr
eezi
ng n
ucle
i per
gra
m P
bO
01m NH4 I
PbO
PbO + 01m NH4 I
PbI2
Freezing nucleus activity of the preparations as a function of temperature
-30-25-20-15-10-50
PbO + 001m NH4 I
10-1
Free
zing
nuc
lei p
er c
m3
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
7
National Academy of Science 2003 Last comprehensive report on weather modification
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpwwwnapeducatalogphprecord_id=10829
8
The lsquoModernrsquo Age of Weather Mod
Early ldquodemonstrationsrdquo with clouds were mixed increased glaciation was observed but little or no enhanced precipitations (clouds contained too little water) ldquoNeed for impartial assessmentrdquo recognized as early as 1957 ldquoDouble blindrdquo studies suggested 1957 1963 (ldquohellipit has not been demonstrated that precipitation hellip can be increased significantly by seedinghelliprdquo) 1973 (ldquoice-nuclei seeding can sometimes lead to more precipitation can sometimes lead to less precipitation and at other times hellip have no effecthelliprdquo) 2003 (ldquohellipour Committee finds little reason to differ from these findingshelliprdquo) Point Theory itself does not show if a technique works when multiple steps are involved (in this case initiation not growth and precipitation) Further the scale of the experiment (lab versus isolated cloud versus system) often leads to different results
9
ldquoBy far the preferred way to resolve the policy makersrsquo dilemma is to lower the emissions of the greenhouse gasesrdquo ldquoTherefore although by far not the best solution the usefulness of artificially enhancing earthrsquos albedo and thereby cooling climate by adding sunlight reflecting aerosol in the stratosphere (Budyko 1977 NAS 1992) might again be explored and debatedhelliprdquo ldquoFinally I repeat the very best would be if emissions of the greenhouse gases could be reduced so much that the stratospheric sulfur release experiment would not need to take place Currently this looks like a pious wishrdquo
10
Budyko M I 1977 lsquoClimatic Changes American Geophysical Societyrsquo Washington DC 244 pp Bodansky D 1996 lsquoMay we engineer the climatersquo Clim Change 33 309ndash321 Dickinson R E 1996 lsquoClimate Engineering A review of aerosol approaches to changing the global energy balancersquo Clim Change 33 279ndash290 Jamieson D 1996 lsquoEthics and intentional climate changersquo Clim Change 33 323 336 Schneider S H 1996 lsquoGeoengineering Could-or-Should-we do itrsquo Clim Change 33 291ndash302 Keith D W 2000 lsquoGeoengineering the climate History and prospectrsquo Annu Rev Energy Environ 25 245ndash284 National Academy of Sciences (NAS) 1992 Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming Mitigation Adaptation and the Science Base Panel on Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy National Academy Press Washington DC 918 pp
Early Referenceshellip
11
ldquoThe climatic changes that may be produced by the increased CO2 content could be
deleterious from the point of view of human beings The possibilities of deliberately bringing about countervailing climatic
changes therefore need to be thoroughly explored A change in the radiation balance
in the opposite direction to that which might result from the increase of
atmospheric CO2 could be produced by raising the albedo or reflectivity of the earth Such a change in albedo could be
brought about for example by spreading very small reflecting particles over large
oceanic areasrdquo
hellipBut Not The Earliest
12
Source New Scientist
Reduction of Solar Radiation Higher Albedo
Carbon Capture
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpwwwnextnaturenet201002nine-geoengineering-strategies
13
Albedo Increase Solar Mitigation
Archer 2007
(1 - α)lsolar
4
Earth
Boundary to space
lup atmosphere
ldown atmospherelup ground
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
14
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpscommonswikimediaorgwikiFileAlbedo-e_hgsvg
Simple Albedo Increase
Courtesy Jimmy Gasore Haider et al 1997
Necessary square footage gtgt available square footage
Image courtesy of nycgov
15
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Naturersquos Examples Direct Effect
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 6 on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
16
Climate Model Response
IPCC 2007 Models
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 95 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
17
Pinatubo ~15 Tg SO2 into the stratosphere
Natural Version of the Direct Effect Method
Robock 1998
Image courtesy of USGS
Image courtesy of NASA
18
Global temperatures dropped by 04-06degC after
Pinatubo Particle layer persisted for 3
years (e-folding ~1 year)
IPCC 2001 Houghton J TY Ding D J Griggs M Noguer P J van der Linden X Dai K Maskell andC A Johnson (eds) Climate Change 2001 The Scientific Basis Contribution of WorkingGroup I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange Cambridge UK Cambridge University Press Used with permission
Wm
2
El ChichonMt Pinatubo
540
520
500
480
460
440
420
400
380
360
34001978
1978
1980 1982
1982
1984 1986 1988 1990
1991
1992 1994 1996 1998
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
19
The Direct Effect Method
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
Say we want to ldquooffsetrdquo current ~075deg C warming Pinatubo was ~15 Tg SO2 injection Some variation of initial injection of ~20 Tg sulfuric acid and then an increasing yearly amount of 10+ Tg Aircraft balloon and other lsquodesignsrsquo (25km tethered hose) proposed
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the third image on page httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
20
The Indirect Effect Method
IPCC 2007
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 210 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
21
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Anthropogenic Example
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 6on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
22
NASA January 27 2003 Atlantic France Spain
from D Rosenfeld Image courtesy of Danniel Rosenfeld Used with permission
Image courtesy of NASA
23
Stephen Salterrsquos design
US Navy
Unpublished results use of particle production in Marine Boundary Layer (MBL) with cloud formation ~1 in 10 times
Image courtesy of US Navy
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpphysicsworldcomcwsarticlenews356931cloud
24
Reward Risk 1 Cool planet 1 Regional droughts 2 Reduce or reverse ice loss 2 Continued ocean acidification 3 Reduce or reverse sea level rise 3 Ozone depletion 4 Increase plant productivity 4 Diffuse radiation effect on plants 5 Nice sunsets 5 Acid deposition 6 Better precipitation control 6 Cirrus effects
7 White skies 8 Lower solar power margins 9 Environmental side effects 10 Cannot stop effects quickly (1-3 years or more) 11 Rapid warming if stopped (all effects back in 1-3 years) 12 Human error 13 Undermining mitigation efforts 14 Cost 15 Who controls Commercialization 16 Military use 17 Whose hand on the thermostat 18 Conflict with treaties 19 ldquoUnknown unknownsrdquo
Robock 2008
What would you propose as a method 1 Model all results first
2 Small scale tests For direct effect method how do you do this 3 Are there effects that canrsquot be accepted
Risk vs Reward
25
As with the example of cheaper natural gas the ldquostop gaprdquo makes a possible ldquolong term solutionrdquo much less likely
Sunlight measured at Mauna Loa The reduction in direct sunlight and increase in diffuse sunlight following the eruption of Mt Pinatuboin 1991 are readily apparent The reduction in total sunlight was much smaller
500
400
300
200
100
1990 1992 1994 1996 19980
Direct
Total
Year
Mau
na L
oa S
olar
Rad
iatio
n (W
m-1
)
100 700
600
500
400
300
200
100
80
60
40
20
0
Annual solar output
Summer on-peak capacity
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998
Year
SEG
S O
n-Pe
ak S
umm
er
Cap
acity
(
)
SEG
S G
ross
Sol
ar
Out
put
(CW
h)
Output of the solar electric generating systems (SEGS) solar thermalpower plants in California (data are from ref 9) The SEGS plants had significant reductions in on-peak capacity and total output following the eruption of Mt Pinatubo
Diffuse
A
B
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
Effect of Stratospheric Aerosols on Direct Sunlight and Implications for Concentrating Solar Power
DANIEL M MURPHYEarth system research laboratory Chemical sciences division National oceanic and atmospheric administration 325 Broadway Boulder Colorado 80305
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
26
Summer sea ice
goes away with a
doubling of CO2
Ice returns with
geoengineering
(but not
homogeneously)
It is possible to
overdo the effect
Rasch et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see Figure 2 in httpiopscienceioporg1748-932644045112fulltext
27
Model 2 (NASA GISS)
Model 1 (Hadley)
Jones et al 2010
Precipitation change from stratospheric sulfate
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 4in httpwwwatmos-chem-physnet1059992010acp-10-5999-2010pdf
28
Precipitation change from marine cloud seeding
Jones et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure4 in httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292008JD011450full
29
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
30
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
This image (published on the Journal of AtmosphericSciences by the American Meteorological Society) iscopyright copy AMS and used with permission
31
Baseline With Geoengineering
Rasch et al 2008
Ethics in research when do you decide to stop researching a topic because the result is too negative When does ldquowe should know more about it in case we try itrdquo conflict with ldquothis is not a good ideardquo
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 8 in httpclimateenvscirutgersedupdfRaschPhilTranspdf
32
ldquoConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniquesrdquo (ENMOD) prohibits the use of the environment as a weapon A result of opposition to Agent Orange and weather modification during Vietnam Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1976 and opened for signature on 18 May 1977 ENMOD entered into force when Laos the twentieth State Party deposited its instrument of ratification on 5 October 1978
Map wikipedia 33
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpenwikipediaorgwikiFileENMOD_Participationsvg
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms
ldquoGeoengineeringrdquo History Weather modification - The changing of natural weather phenomena by technical means for example through the microscale of condensation and freezing nuclei Terraforming - transform (a planet) so as to resemble the earth especially so that it can support human life (Oxford Dictionaries normally attributed to Jack Williamson Collision Orbitrdquo (1942) although many similarities to HG Wells ldquoThe War of the Worldsrdquo (1898)) Geoengineering - the deliberate large-scale manipulation of an environmental process that affects the earthrsquos climate in an attempt to counteract the effects of global warming (Oxford Dictionaries) Generally attributed to Paul Crutzen (2006) but several earlier works
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the firstimage on page httpwwwerbzinecommag14marsterrjpg
httpwwwerbzinecommag14marsterrjpg3
Weather Modification History
Initial attempts at weather modification were of limited successhellip
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the secondimage on httpwwwdesertusacommag07janimagesinstonehtml
4
Hail Cannon (1901)
Cloud Seeding
Lest you think this was a long time agohellip
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see thefirst image on page httpwwwsacreddestinationscomfranceanzy-le-duc-church
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see thefirst image on page httpwwwabsurdintellectualcom20090622all-hail-the-hail-cannons
5
Lest you think this was a long time agohellip
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Pleasesee the image on page httpwwwhailcannoncompictureshtml
6
The lsquoModernrsquo Age of Weather Mod Mid-1940rsquos Generally considered to have grown out of the WWII contrail research The pioneers Vincent Shaefer Irving Langmuir and Bernie Vonnegut at GE Showed that particles with water-ice structure could effectively nucleate ice at temperature near 0deg C
This image (published on the Journal of Meteorology by the AmericanMeteorological Society) is copyright copy AMS and used with permission
103
102
101
100
102
103
104
105
106
Temperature (C)Fr
eezi
ng n
ucle
i per
gra
m P
bO
01m NH4 I
PbO
PbO + 01m NH4 I
PbI2
Freezing nucleus activity of the preparations as a function of temperature
-30-25-20-15-10-50
PbO + 001m NH4 I
10-1
Free
zing
nuc
lei p
er c
m3
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
7
National Academy of Science 2003 Last comprehensive report on weather modification
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpwwwnapeducatalogphprecord_id=10829
8
The lsquoModernrsquo Age of Weather Mod
Early ldquodemonstrationsrdquo with clouds were mixed increased glaciation was observed but little or no enhanced precipitations (clouds contained too little water) ldquoNeed for impartial assessmentrdquo recognized as early as 1957 ldquoDouble blindrdquo studies suggested 1957 1963 (ldquohellipit has not been demonstrated that precipitation hellip can be increased significantly by seedinghelliprdquo) 1973 (ldquoice-nuclei seeding can sometimes lead to more precipitation can sometimes lead to less precipitation and at other times hellip have no effecthelliprdquo) 2003 (ldquohellipour Committee finds little reason to differ from these findingshelliprdquo) Point Theory itself does not show if a technique works when multiple steps are involved (in this case initiation not growth and precipitation) Further the scale of the experiment (lab versus isolated cloud versus system) often leads to different results
9
ldquoBy far the preferred way to resolve the policy makersrsquo dilemma is to lower the emissions of the greenhouse gasesrdquo ldquoTherefore although by far not the best solution the usefulness of artificially enhancing earthrsquos albedo and thereby cooling climate by adding sunlight reflecting aerosol in the stratosphere (Budyko 1977 NAS 1992) might again be explored and debatedhelliprdquo ldquoFinally I repeat the very best would be if emissions of the greenhouse gases could be reduced so much that the stratospheric sulfur release experiment would not need to take place Currently this looks like a pious wishrdquo
10
Budyko M I 1977 lsquoClimatic Changes American Geophysical Societyrsquo Washington DC 244 pp Bodansky D 1996 lsquoMay we engineer the climatersquo Clim Change 33 309ndash321 Dickinson R E 1996 lsquoClimate Engineering A review of aerosol approaches to changing the global energy balancersquo Clim Change 33 279ndash290 Jamieson D 1996 lsquoEthics and intentional climate changersquo Clim Change 33 323 336 Schneider S H 1996 lsquoGeoengineering Could-or-Should-we do itrsquo Clim Change 33 291ndash302 Keith D W 2000 lsquoGeoengineering the climate History and prospectrsquo Annu Rev Energy Environ 25 245ndash284 National Academy of Sciences (NAS) 1992 Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming Mitigation Adaptation and the Science Base Panel on Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy National Academy Press Washington DC 918 pp
Early Referenceshellip
11
ldquoThe climatic changes that may be produced by the increased CO2 content could be
deleterious from the point of view of human beings The possibilities of deliberately bringing about countervailing climatic
changes therefore need to be thoroughly explored A change in the radiation balance
in the opposite direction to that which might result from the increase of
atmospheric CO2 could be produced by raising the albedo or reflectivity of the earth Such a change in albedo could be
brought about for example by spreading very small reflecting particles over large
oceanic areasrdquo
hellipBut Not The Earliest
12
Source New Scientist
Reduction of Solar Radiation Higher Albedo
Carbon Capture
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpwwwnextnaturenet201002nine-geoengineering-strategies
13
Albedo Increase Solar Mitigation
Archer 2007
(1 - α)lsolar
4
Earth
Boundary to space
lup atmosphere
ldown atmospherelup ground
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
14
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpscommonswikimediaorgwikiFileAlbedo-e_hgsvg
Simple Albedo Increase
Courtesy Jimmy Gasore Haider et al 1997
Necessary square footage gtgt available square footage
Image courtesy of nycgov
15
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Naturersquos Examples Direct Effect
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 6 on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
16
Climate Model Response
IPCC 2007 Models
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 95 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
17
Pinatubo ~15 Tg SO2 into the stratosphere
Natural Version of the Direct Effect Method
Robock 1998
Image courtesy of USGS
Image courtesy of NASA
18
Global temperatures dropped by 04-06degC after
Pinatubo Particle layer persisted for 3
years (e-folding ~1 year)
IPCC 2001 Houghton J TY Ding D J Griggs M Noguer P J van der Linden X Dai K Maskell andC A Johnson (eds) Climate Change 2001 The Scientific Basis Contribution of WorkingGroup I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange Cambridge UK Cambridge University Press Used with permission
Wm
2
El ChichonMt Pinatubo
540
520
500
480
460
440
420
400
380
360
34001978
1978
1980 1982
1982
1984 1986 1988 1990
1991
1992 1994 1996 1998
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
19
The Direct Effect Method
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
Say we want to ldquooffsetrdquo current ~075deg C warming Pinatubo was ~15 Tg SO2 injection Some variation of initial injection of ~20 Tg sulfuric acid and then an increasing yearly amount of 10+ Tg Aircraft balloon and other lsquodesignsrsquo (25km tethered hose) proposed
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the third image on page httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
20
The Indirect Effect Method
IPCC 2007
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 210 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
21
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Anthropogenic Example
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 6on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
22
NASA January 27 2003 Atlantic France Spain
from D Rosenfeld Image courtesy of Danniel Rosenfeld Used with permission
Image courtesy of NASA
23
Stephen Salterrsquos design
US Navy
Unpublished results use of particle production in Marine Boundary Layer (MBL) with cloud formation ~1 in 10 times
Image courtesy of US Navy
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpphysicsworldcomcwsarticlenews356931cloud
24
Reward Risk 1 Cool planet 1 Regional droughts 2 Reduce or reverse ice loss 2 Continued ocean acidification 3 Reduce or reverse sea level rise 3 Ozone depletion 4 Increase plant productivity 4 Diffuse radiation effect on plants 5 Nice sunsets 5 Acid deposition 6 Better precipitation control 6 Cirrus effects
7 White skies 8 Lower solar power margins 9 Environmental side effects 10 Cannot stop effects quickly (1-3 years or more) 11 Rapid warming if stopped (all effects back in 1-3 years) 12 Human error 13 Undermining mitigation efforts 14 Cost 15 Who controls Commercialization 16 Military use 17 Whose hand on the thermostat 18 Conflict with treaties 19 ldquoUnknown unknownsrdquo
Robock 2008
What would you propose as a method 1 Model all results first
2 Small scale tests For direct effect method how do you do this 3 Are there effects that canrsquot be accepted
Risk vs Reward
25
As with the example of cheaper natural gas the ldquostop gaprdquo makes a possible ldquolong term solutionrdquo much less likely
Sunlight measured at Mauna Loa The reduction in direct sunlight and increase in diffuse sunlight following the eruption of Mt Pinatuboin 1991 are readily apparent The reduction in total sunlight was much smaller
500
400
300
200
100
1990 1992 1994 1996 19980
Direct
Total
Year
Mau
na L
oa S
olar
Rad
iatio
n (W
m-1
)
100 700
600
500
400
300
200
100
80
60
40
20
0
Annual solar output
Summer on-peak capacity
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998
Year
SEG
S O
n-Pe
ak S
umm
er
Cap
acity
(
)
SEG
S G
ross
Sol
ar
Out
put
(CW
h)
Output of the solar electric generating systems (SEGS) solar thermalpower plants in California (data are from ref 9) The SEGS plants had significant reductions in on-peak capacity and total output following the eruption of Mt Pinatubo
Diffuse
A
B
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
Effect of Stratospheric Aerosols on Direct Sunlight and Implications for Concentrating Solar Power
DANIEL M MURPHYEarth system research laboratory Chemical sciences division National oceanic and atmospheric administration 325 Broadway Boulder Colorado 80305
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
26
Summer sea ice
goes away with a
doubling of CO2
Ice returns with
geoengineering
(but not
homogeneously)
It is possible to
overdo the effect
Rasch et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see Figure 2 in httpiopscienceioporg1748-932644045112fulltext
27
Model 2 (NASA GISS)
Model 1 (Hadley)
Jones et al 2010
Precipitation change from stratospheric sulfate
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 4in httpwwwatmos-chem-physnet1059992010acp-10-5999-2010pdf
28
Precipitation change from marine cloud seeding
Jones et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure4 in httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292008JD011450full
29
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
30
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
This image (published on the Journal of AtmosphericSciences by the American Meteorological Society) iscopyright copy AMS and used with permission
31
Baseline With Geoengineering
Rasch et al 2008
Ethics in research when do you decide to stop researching a topic because the result is too negative When does ldquowe should know more about it in case we try itrdquo conflict with ldquothis is not a good ideardquo
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 8 in httpclimateenvscirutgersedupdfRaschPhilTranspdf
32
ldquoConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniquesrdquo (ENMOD) prohibits the use of the environment as a weapon A result of opposition to Agent Orange and weather modification during Vietnam Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1976 and opened for signature on 18 May 1977 ENMOD entered into force when Laos the twentieth State Party deposited its instrument of ratification on 5 October 1978
Map wikipedia 33
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpenwikipediaorgwikiFileENMOD_Participationsvg
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms
Weather Modification History
Initial attempts at weather modification were of limited successhellip
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the secondimage on httpwwwdesertusacommag07janimagesinstonehtml
4
Hail Cannon (1901)
Cloud Seeding
Lest you think this was a long time agohellip
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see thefirst image on page httpwwwsacreddestinationscomfranceanzy-le-duc-church
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see thefirst image on page httpwwwabsurdintellectualcom20090622all-hail-the-hail-cannons
5
Lest you think this was a long time agohellip
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Pleasesee the image on page httpwwwhailcannoncompictureshtml
6
The lsquoModernrsquo Age of Weather Mod Mid-1940rsquos Generally considered to have grown out of the WWII contrail research The pioneers Vincent Shaefer Irving Langmuir and Bernie Vonnegut at GE Showed that particles with water-ice structure could effectively nucleate ice at temperature near 0deg C
This image (published on the Journal of Meteorology by the AmericanMeteorological Society) is copyright copy AMS and used with permission
103
102
101
100
102
103
104
105
106
Temperature (C)Fr
eezi
ng n
ucle
i per
gra
m P
bO
01m NH4 I
PbO
PbO + 01m NH4 I
PbI2
Freezing nucleus activity of the preparations as a function of temperature
-30-25-20-15-10-50
PbO + 001m NH4 I
10-1
Free
zing
nuc
lei p
er c
m3
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
7
National Academy of Science 2003 Last comprehensive report on weather modification
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpwwwnapeducatalogphprecord_id=10829
8
The lsquoModernrsquo Age of Weather Mod
Early ldquodemonstrationsrdquo with clouds were mixed increased glaciation was observed but little or no enhanced precipitations (clouds contained too little water) ldquoNeed for impartial assessmentrdquo recognized as early as 1957 ldquoDouble blindrdquo studies suggested 1957 1963 (ldquohellipit has not been demonstrated that precipitation hellip can be increased significantly by seedinghelliprdquo) 1973 (ldquoice-nuclei seeding can sometimes lead to more precipitation can sometimes lead to less precipitation and at other times hellip have no effecthelliprdquo) 2003 (ldquohellipour Committee finds little reason to differ from these findingshelliprdquo) Point Theory itself does not show if a technique works when multiple steps are involved (in this case initiation not growth and precipitation) Further the scale of the experiment (lab versus isolated cloud versus system) often leads to different results
9
ldquoBy far the preferred way to resolve the policy makersrsquo dilemma is to lower the emissions of the greenhouse gasesrdquo ldquoTherefore although by far not the best solution the usefulness of artificially enhancing earthrsquos albedo and thereby cooling climate by adding sunlight reflecting aerosol in the stratosphere (Budyko 1977 NAS 1992) might again be explored and debatedhelliprdquo ldquoFinally I repeat the very best would be if emissions of the greenhouse gases could be reduced so much that the stratospheric sulfur release experiment would not need to take place Currently this looks like a pious wishrdquo
10
Budyko M I 1977 lsquoClimatic Changes American Geophysical Societyrsquo Washington DC 244 pp Bodansky D 1996 lsquoMay we engineer the climatersquo Clim Change 33 309ndash321 Dickinson R E 1996 lsquoClimate Engineering A review of aerosol approaches to changing the global energy balancersquo Clim Change 33 279ndash290 Jamieson D 1996 lsquoEthics and intentional climate changersquo Clim Change 33 323 336 Schneider S H 1996 lsquoGeoengineering Could-or-Should-we do itrsquo Clim Change 33 291ndash302 Keith D W 2000 lsquoGeoengineering the climate History and prospectrsquo Annu Rev Energy Environ 25 245ndash284 National Academy of Sciences (NAS) 1992 Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming Mitigation Adaptation and the Science Base Panel on Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy National Academy Press Washington DC 918 pp
Early Referenceshellip
11
ldquoThe climatic changes that may be produced by the increased CO2 content could be
deleterious from the point of view of human beings The possibilities of deliberately bringing about countervailing climatic
changes therefore need to be thoroughly explored A change in the radiation balance
in the opposite direction to that which might result from the increase of
atmospheric CO2 could be produced by raising the albedo or reflectivity of the earth Such a change in albedo could be
brought about for example by spreading very small reflecting particles over large
oceanic areasrdquo
hellipBut Not The Earliest
12
Source New Scientist
Reduction of Solar Radiation Higher Albedo
Carbon Capture
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpwwwnextnaturenet201002nine-geoengineering-strategies
13
Albedo Increase Solar Mitigation
Archer 2007
(1 - α)lsolar
4
Earth
Boundary to space
lup atmosphere
ldown atmospherelup ground
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
14
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpscommonswikimediaorgwikiFileAlbedo-e_hgsvg
Simple Albedo Increase
Courtesy Jimmy Gasore Haider et al 1997
Necessary square footage gtgt available square footage
Image courtesy of nycgov
15
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Naturersquos Examples Direct Effect
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 6 on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
16
Climate Model Response
IPCC 2007 Models
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 95 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
17
Pinatubo ~15 Tg SO2 into the stratosphere
Natural Version of the Direct Effect Method
Robock 1998
Image courtesy of USGS
Image courtesy of NASA
18
Global temperatures dropped by 04-06degC after
Pinatubo Particle layer persisted for 3
years (e-folding ~1 year)
IPCC 2001 Houghton J TY Ding D J Griggs M Noguer P J van der Linden X Dai K Maskell andC A Johnson (eds) Climate Change 2001 The Scientific Basis Contribution of WorkingGroup I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange Cambridge UK Cambridge University Press Used with permission
Wm
2
El ChichonMt Pinatubo
540
520
500
480
460
440
420
400
380
360
34001978
1978
1980 1982
1982
1984 1986 1988 1990
1991
1992 1994 1996 1998
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
19
The Direct Effect Method
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
Say we want to ldquooffsetrdquo current ~075deg C warming Pinatubo was ~15 Tg SO2 injection Some variation of initial injection of ~20 Tg sulfuric acid and then an increasing yearly amount of 10+ Tg Aircraft balloon and other lsquodesignsrsquo (25km tethered hose) proposed
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the third image on page httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
20
The Indirect Effect Method
IPCC 2007
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 210 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
21
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Anthropogenic Example
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 6on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
22
NASA January 27 2003 Atlantic France Spain
from D Rosenfeld Image courtesy of Danniel Rosenfeld Used with permission
Image courtesy of NASA
23
Stephen Salterrsquos design
US Navy
Unpublished results use of particle production in Marine Boundary Layer (MBL) with cloud formation ~1 in 10 times
Image courtesy of US Navy
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpphysicsworldcomcwsarticlenews356931cloud
24
Reward Risk 1 Cool planet 1 Regional droughts 2 Reduce or reverse ice loss 2 Continued ocean acidification 3 Reduce or reverse sea level rise 3 Ozone depletion 4 Increase plant productivity 4 Diffuse radiation effect on plants 5 Nice sunsets 5 Acid deposition 6 Better precipitation control 6 Cirrus effects
7 White skies 8 Lower solar power margins 9 Environmental side effects 10 Cannot stop effects quickly (1-3 years or more) 11 Rapid warming if stopped (all effects back in 1-3 years) 12 Human error 13 Undermining mitigation efforts 14 Cost 15 Who controls Commercialization 16 Military use 17 Whose hand on the thermostat 18 Conflict with treaties 19 ldquoUnknown unknownsrdquo
Robock 2008
What would you propose as a method 1 Model all results first
2 Small scale tests For direct effect method how do you do this 3 Are there effects that canrsquot be accepted
Risk vs Reward
25
As with the example of cheaper natural gas the ldquostop gaprdquo makes a possible ldquolong term solutionrdquo much less likely
Sunlight measured at Mauna Loa The reduction in direct sunlight and increase in diffuse sunlight following the eruption of Mt Pinatuboin 1991 are readily apparent The reduction in total sunlight was much smaller
500
400
300
200
100
1990 1992 1994 1996 19980
Direct
Total
Year
Mau
na L
oa S
olar
Rad
iatio
n (W
m-1
)
100 700
600
500
400
300
200
100
80
60
40
20
0
Annual solar output
Summer on-peak capacity
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998
Year
SEG
S O
n-Pe
ak S
umm
er
Cap
acity
(
)
SEG
S G
ross
Sol
ar
Out
put
(CW
h)
Output of the solar electric generating systems (SEGS) solar thermalpower plants in California (data are from ref 9) The SEGS plants had significant reductions in on-peak capacity and total output following the eruption of Mt Pinatubo
Diffuse
A
B
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
Effect of Stratospheric Aerosols on Direct Sunlight and Implications for Concentrating Solar Power
DANIEL M MURPHYEarth system research laboratory Chemical sciences division National oceanic and atmospheric administration 325 Broadway Boulder Colorado 80305
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
26
Summer sea ice
goes away with a
doubling of CO2
Ice returns with
geoengineering
(but not
homogeneously)
It is possible to
overdo the effect
Rasch et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see Figure 2 in httpiopscienceioporg1748-932644045112fulltext
27
Model 2 (NASA GISS)
Model 1 (Hadley)
Jones et al 2010
Precipitation change from stratospheric sulfate
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 4in httpwwwatmos-chem-physnet1059992010acp-10-5999-2010pdf
28
Precipitation change from marine cloud seeding
Jones et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure4 in httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292008JD011450full
29
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
30
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
This image (published on the Journal of AtmosphericSciences by the American Meteorological Society) iscopyright copy AMS and used with permission
31
Baseline With Geoengineering
Rasch et al 2008
Ethics in research when do you decide to stop researching a topic because the result is too negative When does ldquowe should know more about it in case we try itrdquo conflict with ldquothis is not a good ideardquo
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 8 in httpclimateenvscirutgersedupdfRaschPhilTranspdf
32
ldquoConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniquesrdquo (ENMOD) prohibits the use of the environment as a weapon A result of opposition to Agent Orange and weather modification during Vietnam Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1976 and opened for signature on 18 May 1977 ENMOD entered into force when Laos the twentieth State Party deposited its instrument of ratification on 5 October 1978
Map wikipedia 33
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpenwikipediaorgwikiFileENMOD_Participationsvg
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms
Hail Cannon (1901)
Cloud Seeding
Lest you think this was a long time agohellip
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see thefirst image on page httpwwwsacreddestinationscomfranceanzy-le-duc-church
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see thefirst image on page httpwwwabsurdintellectualcom20090622all-hail-the-hail-cannons
5
Lest you think this was a long time agohellip
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Pleasesee the image on page httpwwwhailcannoncompictureshtml
6
The lsquoModernrsquo Age of Weather Mod Mid-1940rsquos Generally considered to have grown out of the WWII contrail research The pioneers Vincent Shaefer Irving Langmuir and Bernie Vonnegut at GE Showed that particles with water-ice structure could effectively nucleate ice at temperature near 0deg C
This image (published on the Journal of Meteorology by the AmericanMeteorological Society) is copyright copy AMS and used with permission
103
102
101
100
102
103
104
105
106
Temperature (C)Fr
eezi
ng n
ucle
i per
gra
m P
bO
01m NH4 I
PbO
PbO + 01m NH4 I
PbI2
Freezing nucleus activity of the preparations as a function of temperature
-30-25-20-15-10-50
PbO + 001m NH4 I
10-1
Free
zing
nuc
lei p
er c
m3
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
7
National Academy of Science 2003 Last comprehensive report on weather modification
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpwwwnapeducatalogphprecord_id=10829
8
The lsquoModernrsquo Age of Weather Mod
Early ldquodemonstrationsrdquo with clouds were mixed increased glaciation was observed but little or no enhanced precipitations (clouds contained too little water) ldquoNeed for impartial assessmentrdquo recognized as early as 1957 ldquoDouble blindrdquo studies suggested 1957 1963 (ldquohellipit has not been demonstrated that precipitation hellip can be increased significantly by seedinghelliprdquo) 1973 (ldquoice-nuclei seeding can sometimes lead to more precipitation can sometimes lead to less precipitation and at other times hellip have no effecthelliprdquo) 2003 (ldquohellipour Committee finds little reason to differ from these findingshelliprdquo) Point Theory itself does not show if a technique works when multiple steps are involved (in this case initiation not growth and precipitation) Further the scale of the experiment (lab versus isolated cloud versus system) often leads to different results
9
ldquoBy far the preferred way to resolve the policy makersrsquo dilemma is to lower the emissions of the greenhouse gasesrdquo ldquoTherefore although by far not the best solution the usefulness of artificially enhancing earthrsquos albedo and thereby cooling climate by adding sunlight reflecting aerosol in the stratosphere (Budyko 1977 NAS 1992) might again be explored and debatedhelliprdquo ldquoFinally I repeat the very best would be if emissions of the greenhouse gases could be reduced so much that the stratospheric sulfur release experiment would not need to take place Currently this looks like a pious wishrdquo
10
Budyko M I 1977 lsquoClimatic Changes American Geophysical Societyrsquo Washington DC 244 pp Bodansky D 1996 lsquoMay we engineer the climatersquo Clim Change 33 309ndash321 Dickinson R E 1996 lsquoClimate Engineering A review of aerosol approaches to changing the global energy balancersquo Clim Change 33 279ndash290 Jamieson D 1996 lsquoEthics and intentional climate changersquo Clim Change 33 323 336 Schneider S H 1996 lsquoGeoengineering Could-or-Should-we do itrsquo Clim Change 33 291ndash302 Keith D W 2000 lsquoGeoengineering the climate History and prospectrsquo Annu Rev Energy Environ 25 245ndash284 National Academy of Sciences (NAS) 1992 Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming Mitigation Adaptation and the Science Base Panel on Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy National Academy Press Washington DC 918 pp
Early Referenceshellip
11
ldquoThe climatic changes that may be produced by the increased CO2 content could be
deleterious from the point of view of human beings The possibilities of deliberately bringing about countervailing climatic
changes therefore need to be thoroughly explored A change in the radiation balance
in the opposite direction to that which might result from the increase of
atmospheric CO2 could be produced by raising the albedo or reflectivity of the earth Such a change in albedo could be
brought about for example by spreading very small reflecting particles over large
oceanic areasrdquo
hellipBut Not The Earliest
12
Source New Scientist
Reduction of Solar Radiation Higher Albedo
Carbon Capture
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpwwwnextnaturenet201002nine-geoengineering-strategies
13
Albedo Increase Solar Mitigation
Archer 2007
(1 - α)lsolar
4
Earth
Boundary to space
lup atmosphere
ldown atmospherelup ground
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
14
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpscommonswikimediaorgwikiFileAlbedo-e_hgsvg
Simple Albedo Increase
Courtesy Jimmy Gasore Haider et al 1997
Necessary square footage gtgt available square footage
Image courtesy of nycgov
15
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Naturersquos Examples Direct Effect
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 6 on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
16
Climate Model Response
IPCC 2007 Models
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 95 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
17
Pinatubo ~15 Tg SO2 into the stratosphere
Natural Version of the Direct Effect Method
Robock 1998
Image courtesy of USGS
Image courtesy of NASA
18
Global temperatures dropped by 04-06degC after
Pinatubo Particle layer persisted for 3
years (e-folding ~1 year)
IPCC 2001 Houghton J TY Ding D J Griggs M Noguer P J van der Linden X Dai K Maskell andC A Johnson (eds) Climate Change 2001 The Scientific Basis Contribution of WorkingGroup I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange Cambridge UK Cambridge University Press Used with permission
Wm
2
El ChichonMt Pinatubo
540
520
500
480
460
440
420
400
380
360
34001978
1978
1980 1982
1982
1984 1986 1988 1990
1991
1992 1994 1996 1998
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
19
The Direct Effect Method
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
Say we want to ldquooffsetrdquo current ~075deg C warming Pinatubo was ~15 Tg SO2 injection Some variation of initial injection of ~20 Tg sulfuric acid and then an increasing yearly amount of 10+ Tg Aircraft balloon and other lsquodesignsrsquo (25km tethered hose) proposed
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the third image on page httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
20
The Indirect Effect Method
IPCC 2007
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 210 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
21
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Anthropogenic Example
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 6on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
22
NASA January 27 2003 Atlantic France Spain
from D Rosenfeld Image courtesy of Danniel Rosenfeld Used with permission
Image courtesy of NASA
23
Stephen Salterrsquos design
US Navy
Unpublished results use of particle production in Marine Boundary Layer (MBL) with cloud formation ~1 in 10 times
Image courtesy of US Navy
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpphysicsworldcomcwsarticlenews356931cloud
24
Reward Risk 1 Cool planet 1 Regional droughts 2 Reduce or reverse ice loss 2 Continued ocean acidification 3 Reduce or reverse sea level rise 3 Ozone depletion 4 Increase plant productivity 4 Diffuse radiation effect on plants 5 Nice sunsets 5 Acid deposition 6 Better precipitation control 6 Cirrus effects
7 White skies 8 Lower solar power margins 9 Environmental side effects 10 Cannot stop effects quickly (1-3 years or more) 11 Rapid warming if stopped (all effects back in 1-3 years) 12 Human error 13 Undermining mitigation efforts 14 Cost 15 Who controls Commercialization 16 Military use 17 Whose hand on the thermostat 18 Conflict with treaties 19 ldquoUnknown unknownsrdquo
Robock 2008
What would you propose as a method 1 Model all results first
2 Small scale tests For direct effect method how do you do this 3 Are there effects that canrsquot be accepted
Risk vs Reward
25
As with the example of cheaper natural gas the ldquostop gaprdquo makes a possible ldquolong term solutionrdquo much less likely
Sunlight measured at Mauna Loa The reduction in direct sunlight and increase in diffuse sunlight following the eruption of Mt Pinatuboin 1991 are readily apparent The reduction in total sunlight was much smaller
500
400
300
200
100
1990 1992 1994 1996 19980
Direct
Total
Year
Mau
na L
oa S
olar
Rad
iatio
n (W
m-1
)
100 700
600
500
400
300
200
100
80
60
40
20
0
Annual solar output
Summer on-peak capacity
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998
Year
SEG
S O
n-Pe
ak S
umm
er
Cap
acity
(
)
SEG
S G
ross
Sol
ar
Out
put
(CW
h)
Output of the solar electric generating systems (SEGS) solar thermalpower plants in California (data are from ref 9) The SEGS plants had significant reductions in on-peak capacity and total output following the eruption of Mt Pinatubo
Diffuse
A
B
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
Effect of Stratospheric Aerosols on Direct Sunlight and Implications for Concentrating Solar Power
DANIEL M MURPHYEarth system research laboratory Chemical sciences division National oceanic and atmospheric administration 325 Broadway Boulder Colorado 80305
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
26
Summer sea ice
goes away with a
doubling of CO2
Ice returns with
geoengineering
(but not
homogeneously)
It is possible to
overdo the effect
Rasch et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see Figure 2 in httpiopscienceioporg1748-932644045112fulltext
27
Model 2 (NASA GISS)
Model 1 (Hadley)
Jones et al 2010
Precipitation change from stratospheric sulfate
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 4in httpwwwatmos-chem-physnet1059992010acp-10-5999-2010pdf
28
Precipitation change from marine cloud seeding
Jones et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure4 in httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292008JD011450full
29
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
30
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
This image (published on the Journal of AtmosphericSciences by the American Meteorological Society) iscopyright copy AMS and used with permission
31
Baseline With Geoengineering
Rasch et al 2008
Ethics in research when do you decide to stop researching a topic because the result is too negative When does ldquowe should know more about it in case we try itrdquo conflict with ldquothis is not a good ideardquo
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 8 in httpclimateenvscirutgersedupdfRaschPhilTranspdf
32
ldquoConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniquesrdquo (ENMOD) prohibits the use of the environment as a weapon A result of opposition to Agent Orange and weather modification during Vietnam Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1976 and opened for signature on 18 May 1977 ENMOD entered into force when Laos the twentieth State Party deposited its instrument of ratification on 5 October 1978
Map wikipedia 33
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpenwikipediaorgwikiFileENMOD_Participationsvg
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms
Lest you think this was a long time agohellip
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Pleasesee the image on page httpwwwhailcannoncompictureshtml
6
The lsquoModernrsquo Age of Weather Mod Mid-1940rsquos Generally considered to have grown out of the WWII contrail research The pioneers Vincent Shaefer Irving Langmuir and Bernie Vonnegut at GE Showed that particles with water-ice structure could effectively nucleate ice at temperature near 0deg C
This image (published on the Journal of Meteorology by the AmericanMeteorological Society) is copyright copy AMS and used with permission
103
102
101
100
102
103
104
105
106
Temperature (C)Fr
eezi
ng n
ucle
i per
gra
m P
bO
01m NH4 I
PbO
PbO + 01m NH4 I
PbI2
Freezing nucleus activity of the preparations as a function of temperature
-30-25-20-15-10-50
PbO + 001m NH4 I
10-1
Free
zing
nuc
lei p
er c
m3
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
7
National Academy of Science 2003 Last comprehensive report on weather modification
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpwwwnapeducatalogphprecord_id=10829
8
The lsquoModernrsquo Age of Weather Mod
Early ldquodemonstrationsrdquo with clouds were mixed increased glaciation was observed but little or no enhanced precipitations (clouds contained too little water) ldquoNeed for impartial assessmentrdquo recognized as early as 1957 ldquoDouble blindrdquo studies suggested 1957 1963 (ldquohellipit has not been demonstrated that precipitation hellip can be increased significantly by seedinghelliprdquo) 1973 (ldquoice-nuclei seeding can sometimes lead to more precipitation can sometimes lead to less precipitation and at other times hellip have no effecthelliprdquo) 2003 (ldquohellipour Committee finds little reason to differ from these findingshelliprdquo) Point Theory itself does not show if a technique works when multiple steps are involved (in this case initiation not growth and precipitation) Further the scale of the experiment (lab versus isolated cloud versus system) often leads to different results
9
ldquoBy far the preferred way to resolve the policy makersrsquo dilemma is to lower the emissions of the greenhouse gasesrdquo ldquoTherefore although by far not the best solution the usefulness of artificially enhancing earthrsquos albedo and thereby cooling climate by adding sunlight reflecting aerosol in the stratosphere (Budyko 1977 NAS 1992) might again be explored and debatedhelliprdquo ldquoFinally I repeat the very best would be if emissions of the greenhouse gases could be reduced so much that the stratospheric sulfur release experiment would not need to take place Currently this looks like a pious wishrdquo
10
Budyko M I 1977 lsquoClimatic Changes American Geophysical Societyrsquo Washington DC 244 pp Bodansky D 1996 lsquoMay we engineer the climatersquo Clim Change 33 309ndash321 Dickinson R E 1996 lsquoClimate Engineering A review of aerosol approaches to changing the global energy balancersquo Clim Change 33 279ndash290 Jamieson D 1996 lsquoEthics and intentional climate changersquo Clim Change 33 323 336 Schneider S H 1996 lsquoGeoengineering Could-or-Should-we do itrsquo Clim Change 33 291ndash302 Keith D W 2000 lsquoGeoengineering the climate History and prospectrsquo Annu Rev Energy Environ 25 245ndash284 National Academy of Sciences (NAS) 1992 Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming Mitigation Adaptation and the Science Base Panel on Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy National Academy Press Washington DC 918 pp
Early Referenceshellip
11
ldquoThe climatic changes that may be produced by the increased CO2 content could be
deleterious from the point of view of human beings The possibilities of deliberately bringing about countervailing climatic
changes therefore need to be thoroughly explored A change in the radiation balance
in the opposite direction to that which might result from the increase of
atmospheric CO2 could be produced by raising the albedo or reflectivity of the earth Such a change in albedo could be
brought about for example by spreading very small reflecting particles over large
oceanic areasrdquo
hellipBut Not The Earliest
12
Source New Scientist
Reduction of Solar Radiation Higher Albedo
Carbon Capture
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpwwwnextnaturenet201002nine-geoengineering-strategies
13
Albedo Increase Solar Mitigation
Archer 2007
(1 - α)lsolar
4
Earth
Boundary to space
lup atmosphere
ldown atmospherelup ground
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
14
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpscommonswikimediaorgwikiFileAlbedo-e_hgsvg
Simple Albedo Increase
Courtesy Jimmy Gasore Haider et al 1997
Necessary square footage gtgt available square footage
Image courtesy of nycgov
15
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Naturersquos Examples Direct Effect
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 6 on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
16
Climate Model Response
IPCC 2007 Models
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 95 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
17
Pinatubo ~15 Tg SO2 into the stratosphere
Natural Version of the Direct Effect Method
Robock 1998
Image courtesy of USGS
Image courtesy of NASA
18
Global temperatures dropped by 04-06degC after
Pinatubo Particle layer persisted for 3
years (e-folding ~1 year)
IPCC 2001 Houghton J TY Ding D J Griggs M Noguer P J van der Linden X Dai K Maskell andC A Johnson (eds) Climate Change 2001 The Scientific Basis Contribution of WorkingGroup I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange Cambridge UK Cambridge University Press Used with permission
Wm
2
El ChichonMt Pinatubo
540
520
500
480
460
440
420
400
380
360
34001978
1978
1980 1982
1982
1984 1986 1988 1990
1991
1992 1994 1996 1998
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
19
The Direct Effect Method
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
Say we want to ldquooffsetrdquo current ~075deg C warming Pinatubo was ~15 Tg SO2 injection Some variation of initial injection of ~20 Tg sulfuric acid and then an increasing yearly amount of 10+ Tg Aircraft balloon and other lsquodesignsrsquo (25km tethered hose) proposed
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the third image on page httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
20
The Indirect Effect Method
IPCC 2007
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 210 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
21
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Anthropogenic Example
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 6on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
22
NASA January 27 2003 Atlantic France Spain
from D Rosenfeld Image courtesy of Danniel Rosenfeld Used with permission
Image courtesy of NASA
23
Stephen Salterrsquos design
US Navy
Unpublished results use of particle production in Marine Boundary Layer (MBL) with cloud formation ~1 in 10 times
Image courtesy of US Navy
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpphysicsworldcomcwsarticlenews356931cloud
24
Reward Risk 1 Cool planet 1 Regional droughts 2 Reduce or reverse ice loss 2 Continued ocean acidification 3 Reduce or reverse sea level rise 3 Ozone depletion 4 Increase plant productivity 4 Diffuse radiation effect on plants 5 Nice sunsets 5 Acid deposition 6 Better precipitation control 6 Cirrus effects
7 White skies 8 Lower solar power margins 9 Environmental side effects 10 Cannot stop effects quickly (1-3 years or more) 11 Rapid warming if stopped (all effects back in 1-3 years) 12 Human error 13 Undermining mitigation efforts 14 Cost 15 Who controls Commercialization 16 Military use 17 Whose hand on the thermostat 18 Conflict with treaties 19 ldquoUnknown unknownsrdquo
Robock 2008
What would you propose as a method 1 Model all results first
2 Small scale tests For direct effect method how do you do this 3 Are there effects that canrsquot be accepted
Risk vs Reward
25
As with the example of cheaper natural gas the ldquostop gaprdquo makes a possible ldquolong term solutionrdquo much less likely
Sunlight measured at Mauna Loa The reduction in direct sunlight and increase in diffuse sunlight following the eruption of Mt Pinatuboin 1991 are readily apparent The reduction in total sunlight was much smaller
500
400
300
200
100
1990 1992 1994 1996 19980
Direct
Total
Year
Mau
na L
oa S
olar
Rad
iatio
n (W
m-1
)
100 700
600
500
400
300
200
100
80
60
40
20
0
Annual solar output
Summer on-peak capacity
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998
Year
SEG
S O
n-Pe
ak S
umm
er
Cap
acity
(
)
SEG
S G
ross
Sol
ar
Out
put
(CW
h)
Output of the solar electric generating systems (SEGS) solar thermalpower plants in California (data are from ref 9) The SEGS plants had significant reductions in on-peak capacity and total output following the eruption of Mt Pinatubo
Diffuse
A
B
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
Effect of Stratospheric Aerosols on Direct Sunlight and Implications for Concentrating Solar Power
DANIEL M MURPHYEarth system research laboratory Chemical sciences division National oceanic and atmospheric administration 325 Broadway Boulder Colorado 80305
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
26
Summer sea ice
goes away with a
doubling of CO2
Ice returns with
geoengineering
(but not
homogeneously)
It is possible to
overdo the effect
Rasch et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see Figure 2 in httpiopscienceioporg1748-932644045112fulltext
27
Model 2 (NASA GISS)
Model 1 (Hadley)
Jones et al 2010
Precipitation change from stratospheric sulfate
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 4in httpwwwatmos-chem-physnet1059992010acp-10-5999-2010pdf
28
Precipitation change from marine cloud seeding
Jones et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure4 in httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292008JD011450full
29
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
30
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
This image (published on the Journal of AtmosphericSciences by the American Meteorological Society) iscopyright copy AMS and used with permission
31
Baseline With Geoengineering
Rasch et al 2008
Ethics in research when do you decide to stop researching a topic because the result is too negative When does ldquowe should know more about it in case we try itrdquo conflict with ldquothis is not a good ideardquo
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 8 in httpclimateenvscirutgersedupdfRaschPhilTranspdf
32
ldquoConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniquesrdquo (ENMOD) prohibits the use of the environment as a weapon A result of opposition to Agent Orange and weather modification during Vietnam Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1976 and opened for signature on 18 May 1977 ENMOD entered into force when Laos the twentieth State Party deposited its instrument of ratification on 5 October 1978
Map wikipedia 33
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpenwikipediaorgwikiFileENMOD_Participationsvg
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms
The lsquoModernrsquo Age of Weather Mod Mid-1940rsquos Generally considered to have grown out of the WWII contrail research The pioneers Vincent Shaefer Irving Langmuir and Bernie Vonnegut at GE Showed that particles with water-ice structure could effectively nucleate ice at temperature near 0deg C
This image (published on the Journal of Meteorology by the AmericanMeteorological Society) is copyright copy AMS and used with permission
103
102
101
100
102
103
104
105
106
Temperature (C)Fr
eezi
ng n
ucle
i per
gra
m P
bO
01m NH4 I
PbO
PbO + 01m NH4 I
PbI2
Freezing nucleus activity of the preparations as a function of temperature
-30-25-20-15-10-50
PbO + 001m NH4 I
10-1
Free
zing
nuc
lei p
er c
m3
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
7
National Academy of Science 2003 Last comprehensive report on weather modification
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpwwwnapeducatalogphprecord_id=10829
8
The lsquoModernrsquo Age of Weather Mod
Early ldquodemonstrationsrdquo with clouds were mixed increased glaciation was observed but little or no enhanced precipitations (clouds contained too little water) ldquoNeed for impartial assessmentrdquo recognized as early as 1957 ldquoDouble blindrdquo studies suggested 1957 1963 (ldquohellipit has not been demonstrated that precipitation hellip can be increased significantly by seedinghelliprdquo) 1973 (ldquoice-nuclei seeding can sometimes lead to more precipitation can sometimes lead to less precipitation and at other times hellip have no effecthelliprdquo) 2003 (ldquohellipour Committee finds little reason to differ from these findingshelliprdquo) Point Theory itself does not show if a technique works when multiple steps are involved (in this case initiation not growth and precipitation) Further the scale of the experiment (lab versus isolated cloud versus system) often leads to different results
9
ldquoBy far the preferred way to resolve the policy makersrsquo dilemma is to lower the emissions of the greenhouse gasesrdquo ldquoTherefore although by far not the best solution the usefulness of artificially enhancing earthrsquos albedo and thereby cooling climate by adding sunlight reflecting aerosol in the stratosphere (Budyko 1977 NAS 1992) might again be explored and debatedhelliprdquo ldquoFinally I repeat the very best would be if emissions of the greenhouse gases could be reduced so much that the stratospheric sulfur release experiment would not need to take place Currently this looks like a pious wishrdquo
10
Budyko M I 1977 lsquoClimatic Changes American Geophysical Societyrsquo Washington DC 244 pp Bodansky D 1996 lsquoMay we engineer the climatersquo Clim Change 33 309ndash321 Dickinson R E 1996 lsquoClimate Engineering A review of aerosol approaches to changing the global energy balancersquo Clim Change 33 279ndash290 Jamieson D 1996 lsquoEthics and intentional climate changersquo Clim Change 33 323 336 Schneider S H 1996 lsquoGeoengineering Could-or-Should-we do itrsquo Clim Change 33 291ndash302 Keith D W 2000 lsquoGeoengineering the climate History and prospectrsquo Annu Rev Energy Environ 25 245ndash284 National Academy of Sciences (NAS) 1992 Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming Mitigation Adaptation and the Science Base Panel on Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy National Academy Press Washington DC 918 pp
Early Referenceshellip
11
ldquoThe climatic changes that may be produced by the increased CO2 content could be
deleterious from the point of view of human beings The possibilities of deliberately bringing about countervailing climatic
changes therefore need to be thoroughly explored A change in the radiation balance
in the opposite direction to that which might result from the increase of
atmospheric CO2 could be produced by raising the albedo or reflectivity of the earth Such a change in albedo could be
brought about for example by spreading very small reflecting particles over large
oceanic areasrdquo
hellipBut Not The Earliest
12
Source New Scientist
Reduction of Solar Radiation Higher Albedo
Carbon Capture
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpwwwnextnaturenet201002nine-geoengineering-strategies
13
Albedo Increase Solar Mitigation
Archer 2007
(1 - α)lsolar
4
Earth
Boundary to space
lup atmosphere
ldown atmospherelup ground
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
14
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpscommonswikimediaorgwikiFileAlbedo-e_hgsvg
Simple Albedo Increase
Courtesy Jimmy Gasore Haider et al 1997
Necessary square footage gtgt available square footage
Image courtesy of nycgov
15
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Naturersquos Examples Direct Effect
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 6 on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
16
Climate Model Response
IPCC 2007 Models
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 95 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
17
Pinatubo ~15 Tg SO2 into the stratosphere
Natural Version of the Direct Effect Method
Robock 1998
Image courtesy of USGS
Image courtesy of NASA
18
Global temperatures dropped by 04-06degC after
Pinatubo Particle layer persisted for 3
years (e-folding ~1 year)
IPCC 2001 Houghton J TY Ding D J Griggs M Noguer P J van der Linden X Dai K Maskell andC A Johnson (eds) Climate Change 2001 The Scientific Basis Contribution of WorkingGroup I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange Cambridge UK Cambridge University Press Used with permission
Wm
2
El ChichonMt Pinatubo
540
520
500
480
460
440
420
400
380
360
34001978
1978
1980 1982
1982
1984 1986 1988 1990
1991
1992 1994 1996 1998
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
19
The Direct Effect Method
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
Say we want to ldquooffsetrdquo current ~075deg C warming Pinatubo was ~15 Tg SO2 injection Some variation of initial injection of ~20 Tg sulfuric acid and then an increasing yearly amount of 10+ Tg Aircraft balloon and other lsquodesignsrsquo (25km tethered hose) proposed
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the third image on page httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
20
The Indirect Effect Method
IPCC 2007
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 210 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
21
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Anthropogenic Example
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 6on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
22
NASA January 27 2003 Atlantic France Spain
from D Rosenfeld Image courtesy of Danniel Rosenfeld Used with permission
Image courtesy of NASA
23
Stephen Salterrsquos design
US Navy
Unpublished results use of particle production in Marine Boundary Layer (MBL) with cloud formation ~1 in 10 times
Image courtesy of US Navy
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpphysicsworldcomcwsarticlenews356931cloud
24
Reward Risk 1 Cool planet 1 Regional droughts 2 Reduce or reverse ice loss 2 Continued ocean acidification 3 Reduce or reverse sea level rise 3 Ozone depletion 4 Increase plant productivity 4 Diffuse radiation effect on plants 5 Nice sunsets 5 Acid deposition 6 Better precipitation control 6 Cirrus effects
7 White skies 8 Lower solar power margins 9 Environmental side effects 10 Cannot stop effects quickly (1-3 years or more) 11 Rapid warming if stopped (all effects back in 1-3 years) 12 Human error 13 Undermining mitigation efforts 14 Cost 15 Who controls Commercialization 16 Military use 17 Whose hand on the thermostat 18 Conflict with treaties 19 ldquoUnknown unknownsrdquo
Robock 2008
What would you propose as a method 1 Model all results first
2 Small scale tests For direct effect method how do you do this 3 Are there effects that canrsquot be accepted
Risk vs Reward
25
As with the example of cheaper natural gas the ldquostop gaprdquo makes a possible ldquolong term solutionrdquo much less likely
Sunlight measured at Mauna Loa The reduction in direct sunlight and increase in diffuse sunlight following the eruption of Mt Pinatuboin 1991 are readily apparent The reduction in total sunlight was much smaller
500
400
300
200
100
1990 1992 1994 1996 19980
Direct
Total
Year
Mau
na L
oa S
olar
Rad
iatio
n (W
m-1
)
100 700
600
500
400
300
200
100
80
60
40
20
0
Annual solar output
Summer on-peak capacity
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998
Year
SEG
S O
n-Pe
ak S
umm
er
Cap
acity
(
)
SEG
S G
ross
Sol
ar
Out
put
(CW
h)
Output of the solar electric generating systems (SEGS) solar thermalpower plants in California (data are from ref 9) The SEGS plants had significant reductions in on-peak capacity and total output following the eruption of Mt Pinatubo
Diffuse
A
B
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
Effect of Stratospheric Aerosols on Direct Sunlight and Implications for Concentrating Solar Power
DANIEL M MURPHYEarth system research laboratory Chemical sciences division National oceanic and atmospheric administration 325 Broadway Boulder Colorado 80305
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
26
Summer sea ice
goes away with a
doubling of CO2
Ice returns with
geoengineering
(but not
homogeneously)
It is possible to
overdo the effect
Rasch et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see Figure 2 in httpiopscienceioporg1748-932644045112fulltext
27
Model 2 (NASA GISS)
Model 1 (Hadley)
Jones et al 2010
Precipitation change from stratospheric sulfate
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 4in httpwwwatmos-chem-physnet1059992010acp-10-5999-2010pdf
28
Precipitation change from marine cloud seeding
Jones et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure4 in httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292008JD011450full
29
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
30
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
This image (published on the Journal of AtmosphericSciences by the American Meteorological Society) iscopyright copy AMS and used with permission
31
Baseline With Geoengineering
Rasch et al 2008
Ethics in research when do you decide to stop researching a topic because the result is too negative When does ldquowe should know more about it in case we try itrdquo conflict with ldquothis is not a good ideardquo
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 8 in httpclimateenvscirutgersedupdfRaschPhilTranspdf
32
ldquoConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniquesrdquo (ENMOD) prohibits the use of the environment as a weapon A result of opposition to Agent Orange and weather modification during Vietnam Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1976 and opened for signature on 18 May 1977 ENMOD entered into force when Laos the twentieth State Party deposited its instrument of ratification on 5 October 1978
Map wikipedia 33
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpenwikipediaorgwikiFileENMOD_Participationsvg
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms
National Academy of Science 2003 Last comprehensive report on weather modification
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpwwwnapeducatalogphprecord_id=10829
8
The lsquoModernrsquo Age of Weather Mod
Early ldquodemonstrationsrdquo with clouds were mixed increased glaciation was observed but little or no enhanced precipitations (clouds contained too little water) ldquoNeed for impartial assessmentrdquo recognized as early as 1957 ldquoDouble blindrdquo studies suggested 1957 1963 (ldquohellipit has not been demonstrated that precipitation hellip can be increased significantly by seedinghelliprdquo) 1973 (ldquoice-nuclei seeding can sometimes lead to more precipitation can sometimes lead to less precipitation and at other times hellip have no effecthelliprdquo) 2003 (ldquohellipour Committee finds little reason to differ from these findingshelliprdquo) Point Theory itself does not show if a technique works when multiple steps are involved (in this case initiation not growth and precipitation) Further the scale of the experiment (lab versus isolated cloud versus system) often leads to different results
9
ldquoBy far the preferred way to resolve the policy makersrsquo dilemma is to lower the emissions of the greenhouse gasesrdquo ldquoTherefore although by far not the best solution the usefulness of artificially enhancing earthrsquos albedo and thereby cooling climate by adding sunlight reflecting aerosol in the stratosphere (Budyko 1977 NAS 1992) might again be explored and debatedhelliprdquo ldquoFinally I repeat the very best would be if emissions of the greenhouse gases could be reduced so much that the stratospheric sulfur release experiment would not need to take place Currently this looks like a pious wishrdquo
10
Budyko M I 1977 lsquoClimatic Changes American Geophysical Societyrsquo Washington DC 244 pp Bodansky D 1996 lsquoMay we engineer the climatersquo Clim Change 33 309ndash321 Dickinson R E 1996 lsquoClimate Engineering A review of aerosol approaches to changing the global energy balancersquo Clim Change 33 279ndash290 Jamieson D 1996 lsquoEthics and intentional climate changersquo Clim Change 33 323 336 Schneider S H 1996 lsquoGeoengineering Could-or-Should-we do itrsquo Clim Change 33 291ndash302 Keith D W 2000 lsquoGeoengineering the climate History and prospectrsquo Annu Rev Energy Environ 25 245ndash284 National Academy of Sciences (NAS) 1992 Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming Mitigation Adaptation and the Science Base Panel on Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy National Academy Press Washington DC 918 pp
Early Referenceshellip
11
ldquoThe climatic changes that may be produced by the increased CO2 content could be
deleterious from the point of view of human beings The possibilities of deliberately bringing about countervailing climatic
changes therefore need to be thoroughly explored A change in the radiation balance
in the opposite direction to that which might result from the increase of
atmospheric CO2 could be produced by raising the albedo or reflectivity of the earth Such a change in albedo could be
brought about for example by spreading very small reflecting particles over large
oceanic areasrdquo
hellipBut Not The Earliest
12
Source New Scientist
Reduction of Solar Radiation Higher Albedo
Carbon Capture
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpwwwnextnaturenet201002nine-geoengineering-strategies
13
Albedo Increase Solar Mitigation
Archer 2007
(1 - α)lsolar
4
Earth
Boundary to space
lup atmosphere
ldown atmospherelup ground
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
14
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpscommonswikimediaorgwikiFileAlbedo-e_hgsvg
Simple Albedo Increase
Courtesy Jimmy Gasore Haider et al 1997
Necessary square footage gtgt available square footage
Image courtesy of nycgov
15
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Naturersquos Examples Direct Effect
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 6 on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
16
Climate Model Response
IPCC 2007 Models
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 95 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
17
Pinatubo ~15 Tg SO2 into the stratosphere
Natural Version of the Direct Effect Method
Robock 1998
Image courtesy of USGS
Image courtesy of NASA
18
Global temperatures dropped by 04-06degC after
Pinatubo Particle layer persisted for 3
years (e-folding ~1 year)
IPCC 2001 Houghton J TY Ding D J Griggs M Noguer P J van der Linden X Dai K Maskell andC A Johnson (eds) Climate Change 2001 The Scientific Basis Contribution of WorkingGroup I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange Cambridge UK Cambridge University Press Used with permission
Wm
2
El ChichonMt Pinatubo
540
520
500
480
460
440
420
400
380
360
34001978
1978
1980 1982
1982
1984 1986 1988 1990
1991
1992 1994 1996 1998
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
19
The Direct Effect Method
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
Say we want to ldquooffsetrdquo current ~075deg C warming Pinatubo was ~15 Tg SO2 injection Some variation of initial injection of ~20 Tg sulfuric acid and then an increasing yearly amount of 10+ Tg Aircraft balloon and other lsquodesignsrsquo (25km tethered hose) proposed
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the third image on page httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
20
The Indirect Effect Method
IPCC 2007
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 210 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
21
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Anthropogenic Example
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 6on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
22
NASA January 27 2003 Atlantic France Spain
from D Rosenfeld Image courtesy of Danniel Rosenfeld Used with permission
Image courtesy of NASA
23
Stephen Salterrsquos design
US Navy
Unpublished results use of particle production in Marine Boundary Layer (MBL) with cloud formation ~1 in 10 times
Image courtesy of US Navy
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpphysicsworldcomcwsarticlenews356931cloud
24
Reward Risk 1 Cool planet 1 Regional droughts 2 Reduce or reverse ice loss 2 Continued ocean acidification 3 Reduce or reverse sea level rise 3 Ozone depletion 4 Increase plant productivity 4 Diffuse radiation effect on plants 5 Nice sunsets 5 Acid deposition 6 Better precipitation control 6 Cirrus effects
7 White skies 8 Lower solar power margins 9 Environmental side effects 10 Cannot stop effects quickly (1-3 years or more) 11 Rapid warming if stopped (all effects back in 1-3 years) 12 Human error 13 Undermining mitigation efforts 14 Cost 15 Who controls Commercialization 16 Military use 17 Whose hand on the thermostat 18 Conflict with treaties 19 ldquoUnknown unknownsrdquo
Robock 2008
What would you propose as a method 1 Model all results first
2 Small scale tests For direct effect method how do you do this 3 Are there effects that canrsquot be accepted
Risk vs Reward
25
As with the example of cheaper natural gas the ldquostop gaprdquo makes a possible ldquolong term solutionrdquo much less likely
Sunlight measured at Mauna Loa The reduction in direct sunlight and increase in diffuse sunlight following the eruption of Mt Pinatuboin 1991 are readily apparent The reduction in total sunlight was much smaller
500
400
300
200
100
1990 1992 1994 1996 19980
Direct
Total
Year
Mau
na L
oa S
olar
Rad
iatio
n (W
m-1
)
100 700
600
500
400
300
200
100
80
60
40
20
0
Annual solar output
Summer on-peak capacity
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998
Year
SEG
S O
n-Pe
ak S
umm
er
Cap
acity
(
)
SEG
S G
ross
Sol
ar
Out
put
(CW
h)
Output of the solar electric generating systems (SEGS) solar thermalpower plants in California (data are from ref 9) The SEGS plants had significant reductions in on-peak capacity and total output following the eruption of Mt Pinatubo
Diffuse
A
B
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
Effect of Stratospheric Aerosols on Direct Sunlight and Implications for Concentrating Solar Power
DANIEL M MURPHYEarth system research laboratory Chemical sciences division National oceanic and atmospheric administration 325 Broadway Boulder Colorado 80305
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
26
Summer sea ice
goes away with a
doubling of CO2
Ice returns with
geoengineering
(but not
homogeneously)
It is possible to
overdo the effect
Rasch et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see Figure 2 in httpiopscienceioporg1748-932644045112fulltext
27
Model 2 (NASA GISS)
Model 1 (Hadley)
Jones et al 2010
Precipitation change from stratospheric sulfate
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 4in httpwwwatmos-chem-physnet1059992010acp-10-5999-2010pdf
28
Precipitation change from marine cloud seeding
Jones et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure4 in httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292008JD011450full
29
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
30
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
This image (published on the Journal of AtmosphericSciences by the American Meteorological Society) iscopyright copy AMS and used with permission
31
Baseline With Geoengineering
Rasch et al 2008
Ethics in research when do you decide to stop researching a topic because the result is too negative When does ldquowe should know more about it in case we try itrdquo conflict with ldquothis is not a good ideardquo
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 8 in httpclimateenvscirutgersedupdfRaschPhilTranspdf
32
ldquoConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniquesrdquo (ENMOD) prohibits the use of the environment as a weapon A result of opposition to Agent Orange and weather modification during Vietnam Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1976 and opened for signature on 18 May 1977 ENMOD entered into force when Laos the twentieth State Party deposited its instrument of ratification on 5 October 1978
Map wikipedia 33
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpenwikipediaorgwikiFileENMOD_Participationsvg
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms
The lsquoModernrsquo Age of Weather Mod
Early ldquodemonstrationsrdquo with clouds were mixed increased glaciation was observed but little or no enhanced precipitations (clouds contained too little water) ldquoNeed for impartial assessmentrdquo recognized as early as 1957 ldquoDouble blindrdquo studies suggested 1957 1963 (ldquohellipit has not been demonstrated that precipitation hellip can be increased significantly by seedinghelliprdquo) 1973 (ldquoice-nuclei seeding can sometimes lead to more precipitation can sometimes lead to less precipitation and at other times hellip have no effecthelliprdquo) 2003 (ldquohellipour Committee finds little reason to differ from these findingshelliprdquo) Point Theory itself does not show if a technique works when multiple steps are involved (in this case initiation not growth and precipitation) Further the scale of the experiment (lab versus isolated cloud versus system) often leads to different results
9
ldquoBy far the preferred way to resolve the policy makersrsquo dilemma is to lower the emissions of the greenhouse gasesrdquo ldquoTherefore although by far not the best solution the usefulness of artificially enhancing earthrsquos albedo and thereby cooling climate by adding sunlight reflecting aerosol in the stratosphere (Budyko 1977 NAS 1992) might again be explored and debatedhelliprdquo ldquoFinally I repeat the very best would be if emissions of the greenhouse gases could be reduced so much that the stratospheric sulfur release experiment would not need to take place Currently this looks like a pious wishrdquo
10
Budyko M I 1977 lsquoClimatic Changes American Geophysical Societyrsquo Washington DC 244 pp Bodansky D 1996 lsquoMay we engineer the climatersquo Clim Change 33 309ndash321 Dickinson R E 1996 lsquoClimate Engineering A review of aerosol approaches to changing the global energy balancersquo Clim Change 33 279ndash290 Jamieson D 1996 lsquoEthics and intentional climate changersquo Clim Change 33 323 336 Schneider S H 1996 lsquoGeoengineering Could-or-Should-we do itrsquo Clim Change 33 291ndash302 Keith D W 2000 lsquoGeoengineering the climate History and prospectrsquo Annu Rev Energy Environ 25 245ndash284 National Academy of Sciences (NAS) 1992 Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming Mitigation Adaptation and the Science Base Panel on Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy National Academy Press Washington DC 918 pp
Early Referenceshellip
11
ldquoThe climatic changes that may be produced by the increased CO2 content could be
deleterious from the point of view of human beings The possibilities of deliberately bringing about countervailing climatic
changes therefore need to be thoroughly explored A change in the radiation balance
in the opposite direction to that which might result from the increase of
atmospheric CO2 could be produced by raising the albedo or reflectivity of the earth Such a change in albedo could be
brought about for example by spreading very small reflecting particles over large
oceanic areasrdquo
hellipBut Not The Earliest
12
Source New Scientist
Reduction of Solar Radiation Higher Albedo
Carbon Capture
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpwwwnextnaturenet201002nine-geoengineering-strategies
13
Albedo Increase Solar Mitigation
Archer 2007
(1 - α)lsolar
4
Earth
Boundary to space
lup atmosphere
ldown atmospherelup ground
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
14
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpscommonswikimediaorgwikiFileAlbedo-e_hgsvg
Simple Albedo Increase
Courtesy Jimmy Gasore Haider et al 1997
Necessary square footage gtgt available square footage
Image courtesy of nycgov
15
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Naturersquos Examples Direct Effect
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 6 on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
16
Climate Model Response
IPCC 2007 Models
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 95 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
17
Pinatubo ~15 Tg SO2 into the stratosphere
Natural Version of the Direct Effect Method
Robock 1998
Image courtesy of USGS
Image courtesy of NASA
18
Global temperatures dropped by 04-06degC after
Pinatubo Particle layer persisted for 3
years (e-folding ~1 year)
IPCC 2001 Houghton J TY Ding D J Griggs M Noguer P J van der Linden X Dai K Maskell andC A Johnson (eds) Climate Change 2001 The Scientific Basis Contribution of WorkingGroup I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange Cambridge UK Cambridge University Press Used with permission
Wm
2
El ChichonMt Pinatubo
540
520
500
480
460
440
420
400
380
360
34001978
1978
1980 1982
1982
1984 1986 1988 1990
1991
1992 1994 1996 1998
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
19
The Direct Effect Method
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
Say we want to ldquooffsetrdquo current ~075deg C warming Pinatubo was ~15 Tg SO2 injection Some variation of initial injection of ~20 Tg sulfuric acid and then an increasing yearly amount of 10+ Tg Aircraft balloon and other lsquodesignsrsquo (25km tethered hose) proposed
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the third image on page httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
20
The Indirect Effect Method
IPCC 2007
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 210 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
21
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Anthropogenic Example
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 6on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
22
NASA January 27 2003 Atlantic France Spain
from D Rosenfeld Image courtesy of Danniel Rosenfeld Used with permission
Image courtesy of NASA
23
Stephen Salterrsquos design
US Navy
Unpublished results use of particle production in Marine Boundary Layer (MBL) with cloud formation ~1 in 10 times
Image courtesy of US Navy
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpphysicsworldcomcwsarticlenews356931cloud
24
Reward Risk 1 Cool planet 1 Regional droughts 2 Reduce or reverse ice loss 2 Continued ocean acidification 3 Reduce or reverse sea level rise 3 Ozone depletion 4 Increase plant productivity 4 Diffuse radiation effect on plants 5 Nice sunsets 5 Acid deposition 6 Better precipitation control 6 Cirrus effects
7 White skies 8 Lower solar power margins 9 Environmental side effects 10 Cannot stop effects quickly (1-3 years or more) 11 Rapid warming if stopped (all effects back in 1-3 years) 12 Human error 13 Undermining mitigation efforts 14 Cost 15 Who controls Commercialization 16 Military use 17 Whose hand on the thermostat 18 Conflict with treaties 19 ldquoUnknown unknownsrdquo
Robock 2008
What would you propose as a method 1 Model all results first
2 Small scale tests For direct effect method how do you do this 3 Are there effects that canrsquot be accepted
Risk vs Reward
25
As with the example of cheaper natural gas the ldquostop gaprdquo makes a possible ldquolong term solutionrdquo much less likely
Sunlight measured at Mauna Loa The reduction in direct sunlight and increase in diffuse sunlight following the eruption of Mt Pinatuboin 1991 are readily apparent The reduction in total sunlight was much smaller
500
400
300
200
100
1990 1992 1994 1996 19980
Direct
Total
Year
Mau
na L
oa S
olar
Rad
iatio
n (W
m-1
)
100 700
600
500
400
300
200
100
80
60
40
20
0
Annual solar output
Summer on-peak capacity
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998
Year
SEG
S O
n-Pe
ak S
umm
er
Cap
acity
(
)
SEG
S G
ross
Sol
ar
Out
put
(CW
h)
Output of the solar electric generating systems (SEGS) solar thermalpower plants in California (data are from ref 9) The SEGS plants had significant reductions in on-peak capacity and total output following the eruption of Mt Pinatubo
Diffuse
A
B
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
Effect of Stratospheric Aerosols on Direct Sunlight and Implications for Concentrating Solar Power
DANIEL M MURPHYEarth system research laboratory Chemical sciences division National oceanic and atmospheric administration 325 Broadway Boulder Colorado 80305
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
26
Summer sea ice
goes away with a
doubling of CO2
Ice returns with
geoengineering
(but not
homogeneously)
It is possible to
overdo the effect
Rasch et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see Figure 2 in httpiopscienceioporg1748-932644045112fulltext
27
Model 2 (NASA GISS)
Model 1 (Hadley)
Jones et al 2010
Precipitation change from stratospheric sulfate
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 4in httpwwwatmos-chem-physnet1059992010acp-10-5999-2010pdf
28
Precipitation change from marine cloud seeding
Jones et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure4 in httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292008JD011450full
29
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
30
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
This image (published on the Journal of AtmosphericSciences by the American Meteorological Society) iscopyright copy AMS and used with permission
31
Baseline With Geoengineering
Rasch et al 2008
Ethics in research when do you decide to stop researching a topic because the result is too negative When does ldquowe should know more about it in case we try itrdquo conflict with ldquothis is not a good ideardquo
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 8 in httpclimateenvscirutgersedupdfRaschPhilTranspdf
32
ldquoConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniquesrdquo (ENMOD) prohibits the use of the environment as a weapon A result of opposition to Agent Orange and weather modification during Vietnam Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1976 and opened for signature on 18 May 1977 ENMOD entered into force when Laos the twentieth State Party deposited its instrument of ratification on 5 October 1978
Map wikipedia 33
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpenwikipediaorgwikiFileENMOD_Participationsvg
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms
ldquoBy far the preferred way to resolve the policy makersrsquo dilemma is to lower the emissions of the greenhouse gasesrdquo ldquoTherefore although by far not the best solution the usefulness of artificially enhancing earthrsquos albedo and thereby cooling climate by adding sunlight reflecting aerosol in the stratosphere (Budyko 1977 NAS 1992) might again be explored and debatedhelliprdquo ldquoFinally I repeat the very best would be if emissions of the greenhouse gases could be reduced so much that the stratospheric sulfur release experiment would not need to take place Currently this looks like a pious wishrdquo
10
Budyko M I 1977 lsquoClimatic Changes American Geophysical Societyrsquo Washington DC 244 pp Bodansky D 1996 lsquoMay we engineer the climatersquo Clim Change 33 309ndash321 Dickinson R E 1996 lsquoClimate Engineering A review of aerosol approaches to changing the global energy balancersquo Clim Change 33 279ndash290 Jamieson D 1996 lsquoEthics and intentional climate changersquo Clim Change 33 323 336 Schneider S H 1996 lsquoGeoengineering Could-or-Should-we do itrsquo Clim Change 33 291ndash302 Keith D W 2000 lsquoGeoengineering the climate History and prospectrsquo Annu Rev Energy Environ 25 245ndash284 National Academy of Sciences (NAS) 1992 Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming Mitigation Adaptation and the Science Base Panel on Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy National Academy Press Washington DC 918 pp
Early Referenceshellip
11
ldquoThe climatic changes that may be produced by the increased CO2 content could be
deleterious from the point of view of human beings The possibilities of deliberately bringing about countervailing climatic
changes therefore need to be thoroughly explored A change in the radiation balance
in the opposite direction to that which might result from the increase of
atmospheric CO2 could be produced by raising the albedo or reflectivity of the earth Such a change in albedo could be
brought about for example by spreading very small reflecting particles over large
oceanic areasrdquo
hellipBut Not The Earliest
12
Source New Scientist
Reduction of Solar Radiation Higher Albedo
Carbon Capture
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpwwwnextnaturenet201002nine-geoengineering-strategies
13
Albedo Increase Solar Mitigation
Archer 2007
(1 - α)lsolar
4
Earth
Boundary to space
lup atmosphere
ldown atmospherelup ground
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
14
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpscommonswikimediaorgwikiFileAlbedo-e_hgsvg
Simple Albedo Increase
Courtesy Jimmy Gasore Haider et al 1997
Necessary square footage gtgt available square footage
Image courtesy of nycgov
15
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Naturersquos Examples Direct Effect
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 6 on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
16
Climate Model Response
IPCC 2007 Models
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 95 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
17
Pinatubo ~15 Tg SO2 into the stratosphere
Natural Version of the Direct Effect Method
Robock 1998
Image courtesy of USGS
Image courtesy of NASA
18
Global temperatures dropped by 04-06degC after
Pinatubo Particle layer persisted for 3
years (e-folding ~1 year)
IPCC 2001 Houghton J TY Ding D J Griggs M Noguer P J van der Linden X Dai K Maskell andC A Johnson (eds) Climate Change 2001 The Scientific Basis Contribution of WorkingGroup I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange Cambridge UK Cambridge University Press Used with permission
Wm
2
El ChichonMt Pinatubo
540
520
500
480
460
440
420
400
380
360
34001978
1978
1980 1982
1982
1984 1986 1988 1990
1991
1992 1994 1996 1998
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
19
The Direct Effect Method
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
Say we want to ldquooffsetrdquo current ~075deg C warming Pinatubo was ~15 Tg SO2 injection Some variation of initial injection of ~20 Tg sulfuric acid and then an increasing yearly amount of 10+ Tg Aircraft balloon and other lsquodesignsrsquo (25km tethered hose) proposed
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the third image on page httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
20
The Indirect Effect Method
IPCC 2007
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 210 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
21
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Anthropogenic Example
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 6on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
22
NASA January 27 2003 Atlantic France Spain
from D Rosenfeld Image courtesy of Danniel Rosenfeld Used with permission
Image courtesy of NASA
23
Stephen Salterrsquos design
US Navy
Unpublished results use of particle production in Marine Boundary Layer (MBL) with cloud formation ~1 in 10 times
Image courtesy of US Navy
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpphysicsworldcomcwsarticlenews356931cloud
24
Reward Risk 1 Cool planet 1 Regional droughts 2 Reduce or reverse ice loss 2 Continued ocean acidification 3 Reduce or reverse sea level rise 3 Ozone depletion 4 Increase plant productivity 4 Diffuse radiation effect on plants 5 Nice sunsets 5 Acid deposition 6 Better precipitation control 6 Cirrus effects
7 White skies 8 Lower solar power margins 9 Environmental side effects 10 Cannot stop effects quickly (1-3 years or more) 11 Rapid warming if stopped (all effects back in 1-3 years) 12 Human error 13 Undermining mitigation efforts 14 Cost 15 Who controls Commercialization 16 Military use 17 Whose hand on the thermostat 18 Conflict with treaties 19 ldquoUnknown unknownsrdquo
Robock 2008
What would you propose as a method 1 Model all results first
2 Small scale tests For direct effect method how do you do this 3 Are there effects that canrsquot be accepted
Risk vs Reward
25
As with the example of cheaper natural gas the ldquostop gaprdquo makes a possible ldquolong term solutionrdquo much less likely
Sunlight measured at Mauna Loa The reduction in direct sunlight and increase in diffuse sunlight following the eruption of Mt Pinatuboin 1991 are readily apparent The reduction in total sunlight was much smaller
500
400
300
200
100
1990 1992 1994 1996 19980
Direct
Total
Year
Mau
na L
oa S
olar
Rad
iatio
n (W
m-1
)
100 700
600
500
400
300
200
100
80
60
40
20
0
Annual solar output
Summer on-peak capacity
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998
Year
SEG
S O
n-Pe
ak S
umm
er
Cap
acity
(
)
SEG
S G
ross
Sol
ar
Out
put
(CW
h)
Output of the solar electric generating systems (SEGS) solar thermalpower plants in California (data are from ref 9) The SEGS plants had significant reductions in on-peak capacity and total output following the eruption of Mt Pinatubo
Diffuse
A
B
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
Effect of Stratospheric Aerosols on Direct Sunlight and Implications for Concentrating Solar Power
DANIEL M MURPHYEarth system research laboratory Chemical sciences division National oceanic and atmospheric administration 325 Broadway Boulder Colorado 80305
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
26
Summer sea ice
goes away with a
doubling of CO2
Ice returns with
geoengineering
(but not
homogeneously)
It is possible to
overdo the effect
Rasch et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see Figure 2 in httpiopscienceioporg1748-932644045112fulltext
27
Model 2 (NASA GISS)
Model 1 (Hadley)
Jones et al 2010
Precipitation change from stratospheric sulfate
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 4in httpwwwatmos-chem-physnet1059992010acp-10-5999-2010pdf
28
Precipitation change from marine cloud seeding
Jones et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure4 in httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292008JD011450full
29
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
30
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
This image (published on the Journal of AtmosphericSciences by the American Meteorological Society) iscopyright copy AMS and used with permission
31
Baseline With Geoengineering
Rasch et al 2008
Ethics in research when do you decide to stop researching a topic because the result is too negative When does ldquowe should know more about it in case we try itrdquo conflict with ldquothis is not a good ideardquo
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 8 in httpclimateenvscirutgersedupdfRaschPhilTranspdf
32
ldquoConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniquesrdquo (ENMOD) prohibits the use of the environment as a weapon A result of opposition to Agent Orange and weather modification during Vietnam Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1976 and opened for signature on 18 May 1977 ENMOD entered into force when Laos the twentieth State Party deposited its instrument of ratification on 5 October 1978
Map wikipedia 33
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpenwikipediaorgwikiFileENMOD_Participationsvg
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms
Budyko M I 1977 lsquoClimatic Changes American Geophysical Societyrsquo Washington DC 244 pp Bodansky D 1996 lsquoMay we engineer the climatersquo Clim Change 33 309ndash321 Dickinson R E 1996 lsquoClimate Engineering A review of aerosol approaches to changing the global energy balancersquo Clim Change 33 279ndash290 Jamieson D 1996 lsquoEthics and intentional climate changersquo Clim Change 33 323 336 Schneider S H 1996 lsquoGeoengineering Could-or-Should-we do itrsquo Clim Change 33 291ndash302 Keith D W 2000 lsquoGeoengineering the climate History and prospectrsquo Annu Rev Energy Environ 25 245ndash284 National Academy of Sciences (NAS) 1992 Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming Mitigation Adaptation and the Science Base Panel on Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy National Academy Press Washington DC 918 pp
Early Referenceshellip
11
ldquoThe climatic changes that may be produced by the increased CO2 content could be
deleterious from the point of view of human beings The possibilities of deliberately bringing about countervailing climatic
changes therefore need to be thoroughly explored A change in the radiation balance
in the opposite direction to that which might result from the increase of
atmospheric CO2 could be produced by raising the albedo or reflectivity of the earth Such a change in albedo could be
brought about for example by spreading very small reflecting particles over large
oceanic areasrdquo
hellipBut Not The Earliest
12
Source New Scientist
Reduction of Solar Radiation Higher Albedo
Carbon Capture
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpwwwnextnaturenet201002nine-geoengineering-strategies
13
Albedo Increase Solar Mitigation
Archer 2007
(1 - α)lsolar
4
Earth
Boundary to space
lup atmosphere
ldown atmospherelup ground
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
14
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpscommonswikimediaorgwikiFileAlbedo-e_hgsvg
Simple Albedo Increase
Courtesy Jimmy Gasore Haider et al 1997
Necessary square footage gtgt available square footage
Image courtesy of nycgov
15
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Naturersquos Examples Direct Effect
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 6 on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
16
Climate Model Response
IPCC 2007 Models
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 95 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
17
Pinatubo ~15 Tg SO2 into the stratosphere
Natural Version of the Direct Effect Method
Robock 1998
Image courtesy of USGS
Image courtesy of NASA
18
Global temperatures dropped by 04-06degC after
Pinatubo Particle layer persisted for 3
years (e-folding ~1 year)
IPCC 2001 Houghton J TY Ding D J Griggs M Noguer P J van der Linden X Dai K Maskell andC A Johnson (eds) Climate Change 2001 The Scientific Basis Contribution of WorkingGroup I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange Cambridge UK Cambridge University Press Used with permission
Wm
2
El ChichonMt Pinatubo
540
520
500
480
460
440
420
400
380
360
34001978
1978
1980 1982
1982
1984 1986 1988 1990
1991
1992 1994 1996 1998
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
19
The Direct Effect Method
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
Say we want to ldquooffsetrdquo current ~075deg C warming Pinatubo was ~15 Tg SO2 injection Some variation of initial injection of ~20 Tg sulfuric acid and then an increasing yearly amount of 10+ Tg Aircraft balloon and other lsquodesignsrsquo (25km tethered hose) proposed
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the third image on page httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
20
The Indirect Effect Method
IPCC 2007
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 210 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
21
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Anthropogenic Example
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 6on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
22
NASA January 27 2003 Atlantic France Spain
from D Rosenfeld Image courtesy of Danniel Rosenfeld Used with permission
Image courtesy of NASA
23
Stephen Salterrsquos design
US Navy
Unpublished results use of particle production in Marine Boundary Layer (MBL) with cloud formation ~1 in 10 times
Image courtesy of US Navy
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpphysicsworldcomcwsarticlenews356931cloud
24
Reward Risk 1 Cool planet 1 Regional droughts 2 Reduce or reverse ice loss 2 Continued ocean acidification 3 Reduce or reverse sea level rise 3 Ozone depletion 4 Increase plant productivity 4 Diffuse radiation effect on plants 5 Nice sunsets 5 Acid deposition 6 Better precipitation control 6 Cirrus effects
7 White skies 8 Lower solar power margins 9 Environmental side effects 10 Cannot stop effects quickly (1-3 years or more) 11 Rapid warming if stopped (all effects back in 1-3 years) 12 Human error 13 Undermining mitigation efforts 14 Cost 15 Who controls Commercialization 16 Military use 17 Whose hand on the thermostat 18 Conflict with treaties 19 ldquoUnknown unknownsrdquo
Robock 2008
What would you propose as a method 1 Model all results first
2 Small scale tests For direct effect method how do you do this 3 Are there effects that canrsquot be accepted
Risk vs Reward
25
As with the example of cheaper natural gas the ldquostop gaprdquo makes a possible ldquolong term solutionrdquo much less likely
Sunlight measured at Mauna Loa The reduction in direct sunlight and increase in diffuse sunlight following the eruption of Mt Pinatuboin 1991 are readily apparent The reduction in total sunlight was much smaller
500
400
300
200
100
1990 1992 1994 1996 19980
Direct
Total
Year
Mau
na L
oa S
olar
Rad
iatio
n (W
m-1
)
100 700
600
500
400
300
200
100
80
60
40
20
0
Annual solar output
Summer on-peak capacity
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998
Year
SEG
S O
n-Pe
ak S
umm
er
Cap
acity
(
)
SEG
S G
ross
Sol
ar
Out
put
(CW
h)
Output of the solar electric generating systems (SEGS) solar thermalpower plants in California (data are from ref 9) The SEGS plants had significant reductions in on-peak capacity and total output following the eruption of Mt Pinatubo
Diffuse
A
B
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
Effect of Stratospheric Aerosols on Direct Sunlight and Implications for Concentrating Solar Power
DANIEL M MURPHYEarth system research laboratory Chemical sciences division National oceanic and atmospheric administration 325 Broadway Boulder Colorado 80305
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
26
Summer sea ice
goes away with a
doubling of CO2
Ice returns with
geoengineering
(but not
homogeneously)
It is possible to
overdo the effect
Rasch et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see Figure 2 in httpiopscienceioporg1748-932644045112fulltext
27
Model 2 (NASA GISS)
Model 1 (Hadley)
Jones et al 2010
Precipitation change from stratospheric sulfate
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 4in httpwwwatmos-chem-physnet1059992010acp-10-5999-2010pdf
28
Precipitation change from marine cloud seeding
Jones et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure4 in httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292008JD011450full
29
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
30
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
This image (published on the Journal of AtmosphericSciences by the American Meteorological Society) iscopyright copy AMS and used with permission
31
Baseline With Geoengineering
Rasch et al 2008
Ethics in research when do you decide to stop researching a topic because the result is too negative When does ldquowe should know more about it in case we try itrdquo conflict with ldquothis is not a good ideardquo
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 8 in httpclimateenvscirutgersedupdfRaschPhilTranspdf
32
ldquoConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniquesrdquo (ENMOD) prohibits the use of the environment as a weapon A result of opposition to Agent Orange and weather modification during Vietnam Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1976 and opened for signature on 18 May 1977 ENMOD entered into force when Laos the twentieth State Party deposited its instrument of ratification on 5 October 1978
Map wikipedia 33
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpenwikipediaorgwikiFileENMOD_Participationsvg
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms
ldquoThe climatic changes that may be produced by the increased CO2 content could be
deleterious from the point of view of human beings The possibilities of deliberately bringing about countervailing climatic
changes therefore need to be thoroughly explored A change in the radiation balance
in the opposite direction to that which might result from the increase of
atmospheric CO2 could be produced by raising the albedo or reflectivity of the earth Such a change in albedo could be
brought about for example by spreading very small reflecting particles over large
oceanic areasrdquo
hellipBut Not The Earliest
12
Source New Scientist
Reduction of Solar Radiation Higher Albedo
Carbon Capture
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpwwwnextnaturenet201002nine-geoengineering-strategies
13
Albedo Increase Solar Mitigation
Archer 2007
(1 - α)lsolar
4
Earth
Boundary to space
lup atmosphere
ldown atmospherelup ground
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
14
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpscommonswikimediaorgwikiFileAlbedo-e_hgsvg
Simple Albedo Increase
Courtesy Jimmy Gasore Haider et al 1997
Necessary square footage gtgt available square footage
Image courtesy of nycgov
15
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Naturersquos Examples Direct Effect
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 6 on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
16
Climate Model Response
IPCC 2007 Models
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 95 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
17
Pinatubo ~15 Tg SO2 into the stratosphere
Natural Version of the Direct Effect Method
Robock 1998
Image courtesy of USGS
Image courtesy of NASA
18
Global temperatures dropped by 04-06degC after
Pinatubo Particle layer persisted for 3
years (e-folding ~1 year)
IPCC 2001 Houghton J TY Ding D J Griggs M Noguer P J van der Linden X Dai K Maskell andC A Johnson (eds) Climate Change 2001 The Scientific Basis Contribution of WorkingGroup I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange Cambridge UK Cambridge University Press Used with permission
Wm
2
El ChichonMt Pinatubo
540
520
500
480
460
440
420
400
380
360
34001978
1978
1980 1982
1982
1984 1986 1988 1990
1991
1992 1994 1996 1998
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
19
The Direct Effect Method
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
Say we want to ldquooffsetrdquo current ~075deg C warming Pinatubo was ~15 Tg SO2 injection Some variation of initial injection of ~20 Tg sulfuric acid and then an increasing yearly amount of 10+ Tg Aircraft balloon and other lsquodesignsrsquo (25km tethered hose) proposed
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the third image on page httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
20
The Indirect Effect Method
IPCC 2007
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 210 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
21
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Anthropogenic Example
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 6on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
22
NASA January 27 2003 Atlantic France Spain
from D Rosenfeld Image courtesy of Danniel Rosenfeld Used with permission
Image courtesy of NASA
23
Stephen Salterrsquos design
US Navy
Unpublished results use of particle production in Marine Boundary Layer (MBL) with cloud formation ~1 in 10 times
Image courtesy of US Navy
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpphysicsworldcomcwsarticlenews356931cloud
24
Reward Risk 1 Cool planet 1 Regional droughts 2 Reduce or reverse ice loss 2 Continued ocean acidification 3 Reduce or reverse sea level rise 3 Ozone depletion 4 Increase plant productivity 4 Diffuse radiation effect on plants 5 Nice sunsets 5 Acid deposition 6 Better precipitation control 6 Cirrus effects
7 White skies 8 Lower solar power margins 9 Environmental side effects 10 Cannot stop effects quickly (1-3 years or more) 11 Rapid warming if stopped (all effects back in 1-3 years) 12 Human error 13 Undermining mitigation efforts 14 Cost 15 Who controls Commercialization 16 Military use 17 Whose hand on the thermostat 18 Conflict with treaties 19 ldquoUnknown unknownsrdquo
Robock 2008
What would you propose as a method 1 Model all results first
2 Small scale tests For direct effect method how do you do this 3 Are there effects that canrsquot be accepted
Risk vs Reward
25
As with the example of cheaper natural gas the ldquostop gaprdquo makes a possible ldquolong term solutionrdquo much less likely
Sunlight measured at Mauna Loa The reduction in direct sunlight and increase in diffuse sunlight following the eruption of Mt Pinatuboin 1991 are readily apparent The reduction in total sunlight was much smaller
500
400
300
200
100
1990 1992 1994 1996 19980
Direct
Total
Year
Mau
na L
oa S
olar
Rad
iatio
n (W
m-1
)
100 700
600
500
400
300
200
100
80
60
40
20
0
Annual solar output
Summer on-peak capacity
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998
Year
SEG
S O
n-Pe
ak S
umm
er
Cap
acity
(
)
SEG
S G
ross
Sol
ar
Out
put
(CW
h)
Output of the solar electric generating systems (SEGS) solar thermalpower plants in California (data are from ref 9) The SEGS plants had significant reductions in on-peak capacity and total output following the eruption of Mt Pinatubo
Diffuse
A
B
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
Effect of Stratospheric Aerosols on Direct Sunlight and Implications for Concentrating Solar Power
DANIEL M MURPHYEarth system research laboratory Chemical sciences division National oceanic and atmospheric administration 325 Broadway Boulder Colorado 80305
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
26
Summer sea ice
goes away with a
doubling of CO2
Ice returns with
geoengineering
(but not
homogeneously)
It is possible to
overdo the effect
Rasch et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see Figure 2 in httpiopscienceioporg1748-932644045112fulltext
27
Model 2 (NASA GISS)
Model 1 (Hadley)
Jones et al 2010
Precipitation change from stratospheric sulfate
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 4in httpwwwatmos-chem-physnet1059992010acp-10-5999-2010pdf
28
Precipitation change from marine cloud seeding
Jones et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure4 in httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292008JD011450full
29
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
30
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
This image (published on the Journal of AtmosphericSciences by the American Meteorological Society) iscopyright copy AMS and used with permission
31
Baseline With Geoengineering
Rasch et al 2008
Ethics in research when do you decide to stop researching a topic because the result is too negative When does ldquowe should know more about it in case we try itrdquo conflict with ldquothis is not a good ideardquo
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 8 in httpclimateenvscirutgersedupdfRaschPhilTranspdf
32
ldquoConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniquesrdquo (ENMOD) prohibits the use of the environment as a weapon A result of opposition to Agent Orange and weather modification during Vietnam Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1976 and opened for signature on 18 May 1977 ENMOD entered into force when Laos the twentieth State Party deposited its instrument of ratification on 5 October 1978
Map wikipedia 33
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpenwikipediaorgwikiFileENMOD_Participationsvg
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms
Source New Scientist
Reduction of Solar Radiation Higher Albedo
Carbon Capture
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpwwwnextnaturenet201002nine-geoengineering-strategies
13
Albedo Increase Solar Mitigation
Archer 2007
(1 - α)lsolar
4
Earth
Boundary to space
lup atmosphere
ldown atmospherelup ground
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
14
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpscommonswikimediaorgwikiFileAlbedo-e_hgsvg
Simple Albedo Increase
Courtesy Jimmy Gasore Haider et al 1997
Necessary square footage gtgt available square footage
Image courtesy of nycgov
15
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Naturersquos Examples Direct Effect
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 6 on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
16
Climate Model Response
IPCC 2007 Models
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 95 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
17
Pinatubo ~15 Tg SO2 into the stratosphere
Natural Version of the Direct Effect Method
Robock 1998
Image courtesy of USGS
Image courtesy of NASA
18
Global temperatures dropped by 04-06degC after
Pinatubo Particle layer persisted for 3
years (e-folding ~1 year)
IPCC 2001 Houghton J TY Ding D J Griggs M Noguer P J van der Linden X Dai K Maskell andC A Johnson (eds) Climate Change 2001 The Scientific Basis Contribution of WorkingGroup I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange Cambridge UK Cambridge University Press Used with permission
Wm
2
El ChichonMt Pinatubo
540
520
500
480
460
440
420
400
380
360
34001978
1978
1980 1982
1982
1984 1986 1988 1990
1991
1992 1994 1996 1998
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
19
The Direct Effect Method
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
Say we want to ldquooffsetrdquo current ~075deg C warming Pinatubo was ~15 Tg SO2 injection Some variation of initial injection of ~20 Tg sulfuric acid and then an increasing yearly amount of 10+ Tg Aircraft balloon and other lsquodesignsrsquo (25km tethered hose) proposed
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the third image on page httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
20
The Indirect Effect Method
IPCC 2007
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 210 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
21
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Anthropogenic Example
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 6on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
22
NASA January 27 2003 Atlantic France Spain
from D Rosenfeld Image courtesy of Danniel Rosenfeld Used with permission
Image courtesy of NASA
23
Stephen Salterrsquos design
US Navy
Unpublished results use of particle production in Marine Boundary Layer (MBL) with cloud formation ~1 in 10 times
Image courtesy of US Navy
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpphysicsworldcomcwsarticlenews356931cloud
24
Reward Risk 1 Cool planet 1 Regional droughts 2 Reduce or reverse ice loss 2 Continued ocean acidification 3 Reduce or reverse sea level rise 3 Ozone depletion 4 Increase plant productivity 4 Diffuse radiation effect on plants 5 Nice sunsets 5 Acid deposition 6 Better precipitation control 6 Cirrus effects
7 White skies 8 Lower solar power margins 9 Environmental side effects 10 Cannot stop effects quickly (1-3 years or more) 11 Rapid warming if stopped (all effects back in 1-3 years) 12 Human error 13 Undermining mitigation efforts 14 Cost 15 Who controls Commercialization 16 Military use 17 Whose hand on the thermostat 18 Conflict with treaties 19 ldquoUnknown unknownsrdquo
Robock 2008
What would you propose as a method 1 Model all results first
2 Small scale tests For direct effect method how do you do this 3 Are there effects that canrsquot be accepted
Risk vs Reward
25
As with the example of cheaper natural gas the ldquostop gaprdquo makes a possible ldquolong term solutionrdquo much less likely
Sunlight measured at Mauna Loa The reduction in direct sunlight and increase in diffuse sunlight following the eruption of Mt Pinatuboin 1991 are readily apparent The reduction in total sunlight was much smaller
500
400
300
200
100
1990 1992 1994 1996 19980
Direct
Total
Year
Mau
na L
oa S
olar
Rad
iatio
n (W
m-1
)
100 700
600
500
400
300
200
100
80
60
40
20
0
Annual solar output
Summer on-peak capacity
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998
Year
SEG
S O
n-Pe
ak S
umm
er
Cap
acity
(
)
SEG
S G
ross
Sol
ar
Out
put
(CW
h)
Output of the solar electric generating systems (SEGS) solar thermalpower plants in California (data are from ref 9) The SEGS plants had significant reductions in on-peak capacity and total output following the eruption of Mt Pinatubo
Diffuse
A
B
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
Effect of Stratospheric Aerosols on Direct Sunlight and Implications for Concentrating Solar Power
DANIEL M MURPHYEarth system research laboratory Chemical sciences division National oceanic and atmospheric administration 325 Broadway Boulder Colorado 80305
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
26
Summer sea ice
goes away with a
doubling of CO2
Ice returns with
geoengineering
(but not
homogeneously)
It is possible to
overdo the effect
Rasch et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see Figure 2 in httpiopscienceioporg1748-932644045112fulltext
27
Model 2 (NASA GISS)
Model 1 (Hadley)
Jones et al 2010
Precipitation change from stratospheric sulfate
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 4in httpwwwatmos-chem-physnet1059992010acp-10-5999-2010pdf
28
Precipitation change from marine cloud seeding
Jones et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure4 in httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292008JD011450full
29
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
30
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
This image (published on the Journal of AtmosphericSciences by the American Meteorological Society) iscopyright copy AMS and used with permission
31
Baseline With Geoengineering
Rasch et al 2008
Ethics in research when do you decide to stop researching a topic because the result is too negative When does ldquowe should know more about it in case we try itrdquo conflict with ldquothis is not a good ideardquo
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 8 in httpclimateenvscirutgersedupdfRaschPhilTranspdf
32
ldquoConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniquesrdquo (ENMOD) prohibits the use of the environment as a weapon A result of opposition to Agent Orange and weather modification during Vietnam Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1976 and opened for signature on 18 May 1977 ENMOD entered into force when Laos the twentieth State Party deposited its instrument of ratification on 5 October 1978
Map wikipedia 33
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpenwikipediaorgwikiFileENMOD_Participationsvg
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms
Albedo Increase Solar Mitigation
Archer 2007
(1 - α)lsolar
4
Earth
Boundary to space
lup atmosphere
ldown atmospherelup ground
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
14
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpscommonswikimediaorgwikiFileAlbedo-e_hgsvg
Simple Albedo Increase
Courtesy Jimmy Gasore Haider et al 1997
Necessary square footage gtgt available square footage
Image courtesy of nycgov
15
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Naturersquos Examples Direct Effect
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 6 on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
16
Climate Model Response
IPCC 2007 Models
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 95 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
17
Pinatubo ~15 Tg SO2 into the stratosphere
Natural Version of the Direct Effect Method
Robock 1998
Image courtesy of USGS
Image courtesy of NASA
18
Global temperatures dropped by 04-06degC after
Pinatubo Particle layer persisted for 3
years (e-folding ~1 year)
IPCC 2001 Houghton J TY Ding D J Griggs M Noguer P J van der Linden X Dai K Maskell andC A Johnson (eds) Climate Change 2001 The Scientific Basis Contribution of WorkingGroup I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange Cambridge UK Cambridge University Press Used with permission
Wm
2
El ChichonMt Pinatubo
540
520
500
480
460
440
420
400
380
360
34001978
1978
1980 1982
1982
1984 1986 1988 1990
1991
1992 1994 1996 1998
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
19
The Direct Effect Method
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
Say we want to ldquooffsetrdquo current ~075deg C warming Pinatubo was ~15 Tg SO2 injection Some variation of initial injection of ~20 Tg sulfuric acid and then an increasing yearly amount of 10+ Tg Aircraft balloon and other lsquodesignsrsquo (25km tethered hose) proposed
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the third image on page httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
20
The Indirect Effect Method
IPCC 2007
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 210 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
21
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Anthropogenic Example
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 6on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
22
NASA January 27 2003 Atlantic France Spain
from D Rosenfeld Image courtesy of Danniel Rosenfeld Used with permission
Image courtesy of NASA
23
Stephen Salterrsquos design
US Navy
Unpublished results use of particle production in Marine Boundary Layer (MBL) with cloud formation ~1 in 10 times
Image courtesy of US Navy
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpphysicsworldcomcwsarticlenews356931cloud
24
Reward Risk 1 Cool planet 1 Regional droughts 2 Reduce or reverse ice loss 2 Continued ocean acidification 3 Reduce or reverse sea level rise 3 Ozone depletion 4 Increase plant productivity 4 Diffuse radiation effect on plants 5 Nice sunsets 5 Acid deposition 6 Better precipitation control 6 Cirrus effects
7 White skies 8 Lower solar power margins 9 Environmental side effects 10 Cannot stop effects quickly (1-3 years or more) 11 Rapid warming if stopped (all effects back in 1-3 years) 12 Human error 13 Undermining mitigation efforts 14 Cost 15 Who controls Commercialization 16 Military use 17 Whose hand on the thermostat 18 Conflict with treaties 19 ldquoUnknown unknownsrdquo
Robock 2008
What would you propose as a method 1 Model all results first
2 Small scale tests For direct effect method how do you do this 3 Are there effects that canrsquot be accepted
Risk vs Reward
25
As with the example of cheaper natural gas the ldquostop gaprdquo makes a possible ldquolong term solutionrdquo much less likely
Sunlight measured at Mauna Loa The reduction in direct sunlight and increase in diffuse sunlight following the eruption of Mt Pinatuboin 1991 are readily apparent The reduction in total sunlight was much smaller
500
400
300
200
100
1990 1992 1994 1996 19980
Direct
Total
Year
Mau
na L
oa S
olar
Rad
iatio
n (W
m-1
)
100 700
600
500
400
300
200
100
80
60
40
20
0
Annual solar output
Summer on-peak capacity
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998
Year
SEG
S O
n-Pe
ak S
umm
er
Cap
acity
(
)
SEG
S G
ross
Sol
ar
Out
put
(CW
h)
Output of the solar electric generating systems (SEGS) solar thermalpower plants in California (data are from ref 9) The SEGS plants had significant reductions in on-peak capacity and total output following the eruption of Mt Pinatubo
Diffuse
A
B
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
Effect of Stratospheric Aerosols on Direct Sunlight and Implications for Concentrating Solar Power
DANIEL M MURPHYEarth system research laboratory Chemical sciences division National oceanic and atmospheric administration 325 Broadway Boulder Colorado 80305
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
26
Summer sea ice
goes away with a
doubling of CO2
Ice returns with
geoengineering
(but not
homogeneously)
It is possible to
overdo the effect
Rasch et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see Figure 2 in httpiopscienceioporg1748-932644045112fulltext
27
Model 2 (NASA GISS)
Model 1 (Hadley)
Jones et al 2010
Precipitation change from stratospheric sulfate
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 4in httpwwwatmos-chem-physnet1059992010acp-10-5999-2010pdf
28
Precipitation change from marine cloud seeding
Jones et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure4 in httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292008JD011450full
29
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
30
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
This image (published on the Journal of AtmosphericSciences by the American Meteorological Society) iscopyright copy AMS and used with permission
31
Baseline With Geoengineering
Rasch et al 2008
Ethics in research when do you decide to stop researching a topic because the result is too negative When does ldquowe should know more about it in case we try itrdquo conflict with ldquothis is not a good ideardquo
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 8 in httpclimateenvscirutgersedupdfRaschPhilTranspdf
32
ldquoConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniquesrdquo (ENMOD) prohibits the use of the environment as a weapon A result of opposition to Agent Orange and weather modification during Vietnam Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1976 and opened for signature on 18 May 1977 ENMOD entered into force when Laos the twentieth State Party deposited its instrument of ratification on 5 October 1978
Map wikipedia 33
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpenwikipediaorgwikiFileENMOD_Participationsvg
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms
Simple Albedo Increase
Courtesy Jimmy Gasore Haider et al 1997
Necessary square footage gtgt available square footage
Image courtesy of nycgov
15
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Naturersquos Examples Direct Effect
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 6 on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
16
Climate Model Response
IPCC 2007 Models
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 95 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
17
Pinatubo ~15 Tg SO2 into the stratosphere
Natural Version of the Direct Effect Method
Robock 1998
Image courtesy of USGS
Image courtesy of NASA
18
Global temperatures dropped by 04-06degC after
Pinatubo Particle layer persisted for 3
years (e-folding ~1 year)
IPCC 2001 Houghton J TY Ding D J Griggs M Noguer P J van der Linden X Dai K Maskell andC A Johnson (eds) Climate Change 2001 The Scientific Basis Contribution of WorkingGroup I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange Cambridge UK Cambridge University Press Used with permission
Wm
2
El ChichonMt Pinatubo
540
520
500
480
460
440
420
400
380
360
34001978
1978
1980 1982
1982
1984 1986 1988 1990
1991
1992 1994 1996 1998
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
19
The Direct Effect Method
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
Say we want to ldquooffsetrdquo current ~075deg C warming Pinatubo was ~15 Tg SO2 injection Some variation of initial injection of ~20 Tg sulfuric acid and then an increasing yearly amount of 10+ Tg Aircraft balloon and other lsquodesignsrsquo (25km tethered hose) proposed
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the third image on page httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
20
The Indirect Effect Method
IPCC 2007
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 210 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
21
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Anthropogenic Example
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 6on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
22
NASA January 27 2003 Atlantic France Spain
from D Rosenfeld Image courtesy of Danniel Rosenfeld Used with permission
Image courtesy of NASA
23
Stephen Salterrsquos design
US Navy
Unpublished results use of particle production in Marine Boundary Layer (MBL) with cloud formation ~1 in 10 times
Image courtesy of US Navy
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpphysicsworldcomcwsarticlenews356931cloud
24
Reward Risk 1 Cool planet 1 Regional droughts 2 Reduce or reverse ice loss 2 Continued ocean acidification 3 Reduce or reverse sea level rise 3 Ozone depletion 4 Increase plant productivity 4 Diffuse radiation effect on plants 5 Nice sunsets 5 Acid deposition 6 Better precipitation control 6 Cirrus effects
7 White skies 8 Lower solar power margins 9 Environmental side effects 10 Cannot stop effects quickly (1-3 years or more) 11 Rapid warming if stopped (all effects back in 1-3 years) 12 Human error 13 Undermining mitigation efforts 14 Cost 15 Who controls Commercialization 16 Military use 17 Whose hand on the thermostat 18 Conflict with treaties 19 ldquoUnknown unknownsrdquo
Robock 2008
What would you propose as a method 1 Model all results first
2 Small scale tests For direct effect method how do you do this 3 Are there effects that canrsquot be accepted
Risk vs Reward
25
As with the example of cheaper natural gas the ldquostop gaprdquo makes a possible ldquolong term solutionrdquo much less likely
Sunlight measured at Mauna Loa The reduction in direct sunlight and increase in diffuse sunlight following the eruption of Mt Pinatuboin 1991 are readily apparent The reduction in total sunlight was much smaller
500
400
300
200
100
1990 1992 1994 1996 19980
Direct
Total
Year
Mau
na L
oa S
olar
Rad
iatio
n (W
m-1
)
100 700
600
500
400
300
200
100
80
60
40
20
0
Annual solar output
Summer on-peak capacity
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998
Year
SEG
S O
n-Pe
ak S
umm
er
Cap
acity
(
)
SEG
S G
ross
Sol
ar
Out
put
(CW
h)
Output of the solar electric generating systems (SEGS) solar thermalpower plants in California (data are from ref 9) The SEGS plants had significant reductions in on-peak capacity and total output following the eruption of Mt Pinatubo
Diffuse
A
B
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
Effect of Stratospheric Aerosols on Direct Sunlight and Implications for Concentrating Solar Power
DANIEL M MURPHYEarth system research laboratory Chemical sciences division National oceanic and atmospheric administration 325 Broadway Boulder Colorado 80305
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
26
Summer sea ice
goes away with a
doubling of CO2
Ice returns with
geoengineering
(but not
homogeneously)
It is possible to
overdo the effect
Rasch et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see Figure 2 in httpiopscienceioporg1748-932644045112fulltext
27
Model 2 (NASA GISS)
Model 1 (Hadley)
Jones et al 2010
Precipitation change from stratospheric sulfate
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 4in httpwwwatmos-chem-physnet1059992010acp-10-5999-2010pdf
28
Precipitation change from marine cloud seeding
Jones et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure4 in httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292008JD011450full
29
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
30
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
This image (published on the Journal of AtmosphericSciences by the American Meteorological Society) iscopyright copy AMS and used with permission
31
Baseline With Geoengineering
Rasch et al 2008
Ethics in research when do you decide to stop researching a topic because the result is too negative When does ldquowe should know more about it in case we try itrdquo conflict with ldquothis is not a good ideardquo
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 8 in httpclimateenvscirutgersedupdfRaschPhilTranspdf
32
ldquoConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniquesrdquo (ENMOD) prohibits the use of the environment as a weapon A result of opposition to Agent Orange and weather modification during Vietnam Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1976 and opened for signature on 18 May 1977 ENMOD entered into force when Laos the twentieth State Party deposited its instrument of ratification on 5 October 1978
Map wikipedia 33
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpenwikipediaorgwikiFileENMOD_Participationsvg
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Naturersquos Examples Direct Effect
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 6 on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
16
Climate Model Response
IPCC 2007 Models
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 95 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
17
Pinatubo ~15 Tg SO2 into the stratosphere
Natural Version of the Direct Effect Method
Robock 1998
Image courtesy of USGS
Image courtesy of NASA
18
Global temperatures dropped by 04-06degC after
Pinatubo Particle layer persisted for 3
years (e-folding ~1 year)
IPCC 2001 Houghton J TY Ding D J Griggs M Noguer P J van der Linden X Dai K Maskell andC A Johnson (eds) Climate Change 2001 The Scientific Basis Contribution of WorkingGroup I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange Cambridge UK Cambridge University Press Used with permission
Wm
2
El ChichonMt Pinatubo
540
520
500
480
460
440
420
400
380
360
34001978
1978
1980 1982
1982
1984 1986 1988 1990
1991
1992 1994 1996 1998
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
19
The Direct Effect Method
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
Say we want to ldquooffsetrdquo current ~075deg C warming Pinatubo was ~15 Tg SO2 injection Some variation of initial injection of ~20 Tg sulfuric acid and then an increasing yearly amount of 10+ Tg Aircraft balloon and other lsquodesignsrsquo (25km tethered hose) proposed
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the third image on page httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
20
The Indirect Effect Method
IPCC 2007
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 210 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
21
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Anthropogenic Example
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 6on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
22
NASA January 27 2003 Atlantic France Spain
from D Rosenfeld Image courtesy of Danniel Rosenfeld Used with permission
Image courtesy of NASA
23
Stephen Salterrsquos design
US Navy
Unpublished results use of particle production in Marine Boundary Layer (MBL) with cloud formation ~1 in 10 times
Image courtesy of US Navy
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpphysicsworldcomcwsarticlenews356931cloud
24
Reward Risk 1 Cool planet 1 Regional droughts 2 Reduce or reverse ice loss 2 Continued ocean acidification 3 Reduce or reverse sea level rise 3 Ozone depletion 4 Increase plant productivity 4 Diffuse radiation effect on plants 5 Nice sunsets 5 Acid deposition 6 Better precipitation control 6 Cirrus effects
7 White skies 8 Lower solar power margins 9 Environmental side effects 10 Cannot stop effects quickly (1-3 years or more) 11 Rapid warming if stopped (all effects back in 1-3 years) 12 Human error 13 Undermining mitigation efforts 14 Cost 15 Who controls Commercialization 16 Military use 17 Whose hand on the thermostat 18 Conflict with treaties 19 ldquoUnknown unknownsrdquo
Robock 2008
What would you propose as a method 1 Model all results first
2 Small scale tests For direct effect method how do you do this 3 Are there effects that canrsquot be accepted
Risk vs Reward
25
As with the example of cheaper natural gas the ldquostop gaprdquo makes a possible ldquolong term solutionrdquo much less likely
Sunlight measured at Mauna Loa The reduction in direct sunlight and increase in diffuse sunlight following the eruption of Mt Pinatuboin 1991 are readily apparent The reduction in total sunlight was much smaller
500
400
300
200
100
1990 1992 1994 1996 19980
Direct
Total
Year
Mau
na L
oa S
olar
Rad
iatio
n (W
m-1
)
100 700
600
500
400
300
200
100
80
60
40
20
0
Annual solar output
Summer on-peak capacity
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998
Year
SEG
S O
n-Pe
ak S
umm
er
Cap
acity
(
)
SEG
S G
ross
Sol
ar
Out
put
(CW
h)
Output of the solar electric generating systems (SEGS) solar thermalpower plants in California (data are from ref 9) The SEGS plants had significant reductions in on-peak capacity and total output following the eruption of Mt Pinatubo
Diffuse
A
B
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
Effect of Stratospheric Aerosols on Direct Sunlight and Implications for Concentrating Solar Power
DANIEL M MURPHYEarth system research laboratory Chemical sciences division National oceanic and atmospheric administration 325 Broadway Boulder Colorado 80305
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
26
Summer sea ice
goes away with a
doubling of CO2
Ice returns with
geoengineering
(but not
homogeneously)
It is possible to
overdo the effect
Rasch et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see Figure 2 in httpiopscienceioporg1748-932644045112fulltext
27
Model 2 (NASA GISS)
Model 1 (Hadley)
Jones et al 2010
Precipitation change from stratospheric sulfate
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 4in httpwwwatmos-chem-physnet1059992010acp-10-5999-2010pdf
28
Precipitation change from marine cloud seeding
Jones et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure4 in httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292008JD011450full
29
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
30
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
This image (published on the Journal of AtmosphericSciences by the American Meteorological Society) iscopyright copy AMS and used with permission
31
Baseline With Geoengineering
Rasch et al 2008
Ethics in research when do you decide to stop researching a topic because the result is too negative When does ldquowe should know more about it in case we try itrdquo conflict with ldquothis is not a good ideardquo
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 8 in httpclimateenvscirutgersedupdfRaschPhilTranspdf
32
ldquoConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniquesrdquo (ENMOD) prohibits the use of the environment as a weapon A result of opposition to Agent Orange and weather modification during Vietnam Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1976 and opened for signature on 18 May 1977 ENMOD entered into force when Laos the twentieth State Party deposited its instrument of ratification on 5 October 1978
Map wikipedia 33
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpenwikipediaorgwikiFileENMOD_Participationsvg
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms
Climate Model Response
IPCC 2007 Models
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 95 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
17
Pinatubo ~15 Tg SO2 into the stratosphere
Natural Version of the Direct Effect Method
Robock 1998
Image courtesy of USGS
Image courtesy of NASA
18
Global temperatures dropped by 04-06degC after
Pinatubo Particle layer persisted for 3
years (e-folding ~1 year)
IPCC 2001 Houghton J TY Ding D J Griggs M Noguer P J van der Linden X Dai K Maskell andC A Johnson (eds) Climate Change 2001 The Scientific Basis Contribution of WorkingGroup I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange Cambridge UK Cambridge University Press Used with permission
Wm
2
El ChichonMt Pinatubo
540
520
500
480
460
440
420
400
380
360
34001978
1978
1980 1982
1982
1984 1986 1988 1990
1991
1992 1994 1996 1998
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
19
The Direct Effect Method
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
Say we want to ldquooffsetrdquo current ~075deg C warming Pinatubo was ~15 Tg SO2 injection Some variation of initial injection of ~20 Tg sulfuric acid and then an increasing yearly amount of 10+ Tg Aircraft balloon and other lsquodesignsrsquo (25km tethered hose) proposed
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the third image on page httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
20
The Indirect Effect Method
IPCC 2007
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 210 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
21
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Anthropogenic Example
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 6on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
22
NASA January 27 2003 Atlantic France Spain
from D Rosenfeld Image courtesy of Danniel Rosenfeld Used with permission
Image courtesy of NASA
23
Stephen Salterrsquos design
US Navy
Unpublished results use of particle production in Marine Boundary Layer (MBL) with cloud formation ~1 in 10 times
Image courtesy of US Navy
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpphysicsworldcomcwsarticlenews356931cloud
24
Reward Risk 1 Cool planet 1 Regional droughts 2 Reduce or reverse ice loss 2 Continued ocean acidification 3 Reduce or reverse sea level rise 3 Ozone depletion 4 Increase plant productivity 4 Diffuse radiation effect on plants 5 Nice sunsets 5 Acid deposition 6 Better precipitation control 6 Cirrus effects
7 White skies 8 Lower solar power margins 9 Environmental side effects 10 Cannot stop effects quickly (1-3 years or more) 11 Rapid warming if stopped (all effects back in 1-3 years) 12 Human error 13 Undermining mitigation efforts 14 Cost 15 Who controls Commercialization 16 Military use 17 Whose hand on the thermostat 18 Conflict with treaties 19 ldquoUnknown unknownsrdquo
Robock 2008
What would you propose as a method 1 Model all results first
2 Small scale tests For direct effect method how do you do this 3 Are there effects that canrsquot be accepted
Risk vs Reward
25
As with the example of cheaper natural gas the ldquostop gaprdquo makes a possible ldquolong term solutionrdquo much less likely
Sunlight measured at Mauna Loa The reduction in direct sunlight and increase in diffuse sunlight following the eruption of Mt Pinatuboin 1991 are readily apparent The reduction in total sunlight was much smaller
500
400
300
200
100
1990 1992 1994 1996 19980
Direct
Total
Year
Mau
na L
oa S
olar
Rad
iatio
n (W
m-1
)
100 700
600
500
400
300
200
100
80
60
40
20
0
Annual solar output
Summer on-peak capacity
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998
Year
SEG
S O
n-Pe
ak S
umm
er
Cap
acity
(
)
SEG
S G
ross
Sol
ar
Out
put
(CW
h)
Output of the solar electric generating systems (SEGS) solar thermalpower plants in California (data are from ref 9) The SEGS plants had significant reductions in on-peak capacity and total output following the eruption of Mt Pinatubo
Diffuse
A
B
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
Effect of Stratospheric Aerosols on Direct Sunlight and Implications for Concentrating Solar Power
DANIEL M MURPHYEarth system research laboratory Chemical sciences division National oceanic and atmospheric administration 325 Broadway Boulder Colorado 80305
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
26
Summer sea ice
goes away with a
doubling of CO2
Ice returns with
geoengineering
(but not
homogeneously)
It is possible to
overdo the effect
Rasch et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see Figure 2 in httpiopscienceioporg1748-932644045112fulltext
27
Model 2 (NASA GISS)
Model 1 (Hadley)
Jones et al 2010
Precipitation change from stratospheric sulfate
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 4in httpwwwatmos-chem-physnet1059992010acp-10-5999-2010pdf
28
Precipitation change from marine cloud seeding
Jones et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure4 in httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292008JD011450full
29
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
30
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
This image (published on the Journal of AtmosphericSciences by the American Meteorological Society) iscopyright copy AMS and used with permission
31
Baseline With Geoengineering
Rasch et al 2008
Ethics in research when do you decide to stop researching a topic because the result is too negative When does ldquowe should know more about it in case we try itrdquo conflict with ldquothis is not a good ideardquo
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 8 in httpclimateenvscirutgersedupdfRaschPhilTranspdf
32
ldquoConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniquesrdquo (ENMOD) prohibits the use of the environment as a weapon A result of opposition to Agent Orange and weather modification during Vietnam Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1976 and opened for signature on 18 May 1977 ENMOD entered into force when Laos the twentieth State Party deposited its instrument of ratification on 5 October 1978
Map wikipedia 33
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpenwikipediaorgwikiFileENMOD_Participationsvg
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms
Pinatubo ~15 Tg SO2 into the stratosphere
Natural Version of the Direct Effect Method
Robock 1998
Image courtesy of USGS
Image courtesy of NASA
18
Global temperatures dropped by 04-06degC after
Pinatubo Particle layer persisted for 3
years (e-folding ~1 year)
IPCC 2001 Houghton J TY Ding D J Griggs M Noguer P J van der Linden X Dai K Maskell andC A Johnson (eds) Climate Change 2001 The Scientific Basis Contribution of WorkingGroup I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange Cambridge UK Cambridge University Press Used with permission
Wm
2
El ChichonMt Pinatubo
540
520
500
480
460
440
420
400
380
360
34001978
1978
1980 1982
1982
1984 1986 1988 1990
1991
1992 1994 1996 1998
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
19
The Direct Effect Method
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
Say we want to ldquooffsetrdquo current ~075deg C warming Pinatubo was ~15 Tg SO2 injection Some variation of initial injection of ~20 Tg sulfuric acid and then an increasing yearly amount of 10+ Tg Aircraft balloon and other lsquodesignsrsquo (25km tethered hose) proposed
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the third image on page httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
20
The Indirect Effect Method
IPCC 2007
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 210 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
21
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Anthropogenic Example
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 6on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
22
NASA January 27 2003 Atlantic France Spain
from D Rosenfeld Image courtesy of Danniel Rosenfeld Used with permission
Image courtesy of NASA
23
Stephen Salterrsquos design
US Navy
Unpublished results use of particle production in Marine Boundary Layer (MBL) with cloud formation ~1 in 10 times
Image courtesy of US Navy
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpphysicsworldcomcwsarticlenews356931cloud
24
Reward Risk 1 Cool planet 1 Regional droughts 2 Reduce or reverse ice loss 2 Continued ocean acidification 3 Reduce or reverse sea level rise 3 Ozone depletion 4 Increase plant productivity 4 Diffuse radiation effect on plants 5 Nice sunsets 5 Acid deposition 6 Better precipitation control 6 Cirrus effects
7 White skies 8 Lower solar power margins 9 Environmental side effects 10 Cannot stop effects quickly (1-3 years or more) 11 Rapid warming if stopped (all effects back in 1-3 years) 12 Human error 13 Undermining mitigation efforts 14 Cost 15 Who controls Commercialization 16 Military use 17 Whose hand on the thermostat 18 Conflict with treaties 19 ldquoUnknown unknownsrdquo
Robock 2008
What would you propose as a method 1 Model all results first
2 Small scale tests For direct effect method how do you do this 3 Are there effects that canrsquot be accepted
Risk vs Reward
25
As with the example of cheaper natural gas the ldquostop gaprdquo makes a possible ldquolong term solutionrdquo much less likely
Sunlight measured at Mauna Loa The reduction in direct sunlight and increase in diffuse sunlight following the eruption of Mt Pinatuboin 1991 are readily apparent The reduction in total sunlight was much smaller
500
400
300
200
100
1990 1992 1994 1996 19980
Direct
Total
Year
Mau
na L
oa S
olar
Rad
iatio
n (W
m-1
)
100 700
600
500
400
300
200
100
80
60
40
20
0
Annual solar output
Summer on-peak capacity
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998
Year
SEG
S O
n-Pe
ak S
umm
er
Cap
acity
(
)
SEG
S G
ross
Sol
ar
Out
put
(CW
h)
Output of the solar electric generating systems (SEGS) solar thermalpower plants in California (data are from ref 9) The SEGS plants had significant reductions in on-peak capacity and total output following the eruption of Mt Pinatubo
Diffuse
A
B
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
Effect of Stratospheric Aerosols on Direct Sunlight and Implications for Concentrating Solar Power
DANIEL M MURPHYEarth system research laboratory Chemical sciences division National oceanic and atmospheric administration 325 Broadway Boulder Colorado 80305
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
26
Summer sea ice
goes away with a
doubling of CO2
Ice returns with
geoengineering
(but not
homogeneously)
It is possible to
overdo the effect
Rasch et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see Figure 2 in httpiopscienceioporg1748-932644045112fulltext
27
Model 2 (NASA GISS)
Model 1 (Hadley)
Jones et al 2010
Precipitation change from stratospheric sulfate
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 4in httpwwwatmos-chem-physnet1059992010acp-10-5999-2010pdf
28
Precipitation change from marine cloud seeding
Jones et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure4 in httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292008JD011450full
29
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
30
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
This image (published on the Journal of AtmosphericSciences by the American Meteorological Society) iscopyright copy AMS and used with permission
31
Baseline With Geoengineering
Rasch et al 2008
Ethics in research when do you decide to stop researching a topic because the result is too negative When does ldquowe should know more about it in case we try itrdquo conflict with ldquothis is not a good ideardquo
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 8 in httpclimateenvscirutgersedupdfRaschPhilTranspdf
32
ldquoConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniquesrdquo (ENMOD) prohibits the use of the environment as a weapon A result of opposition to Agent Orange and weather modification during Vietnam Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1976 and opened for signature on 18 May 1977 ENMOD entered into force when Laos the twentieth State Party deposited its instrument of ratification on 5 October 1978
Map wikipedia 33
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpenwikipediaorgwikiFileENMOD_Participationsvg
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms
Global temperatures dropped by 04-06degC after
Pinatubo Particle layer persisted for 3
years (e-folding ~1 year)
IPCC 2001 Houghton J TY Ding D J Griggs M Noguer P J van der Linden X Dai K Maskell andC A Johnson (eds) Climate Change 2001 The Scientific Basis Contribution of WorkingGroup I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange Cambridge UK Cambridge University Press Used with permission
Wm
2
El ChichonMt Pinatubo
540
520
500
480
460
440
420
400
380
360
34001978
1978
1980 1982
1982
1984 1986 1988 1990
1991
1992 1994 1996 1998
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
19
The Direct Effect Method
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
Say we want to ldquooffsetrdquo current ~075deg C warming Pinatubo was ~15 Tg SO2 injection Some variation of initial injection of ~20 Tg sulfuric acid and then an increasing yearly amount of 10+ Tg Aircraft balloon and other lsquodesignsrsquo (25km tethered hose) proposed
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the third image on page httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
20
The Indirect Effect Method
IPCC 2007
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 210 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
21
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Anthropogenic Example
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 6on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
22
NASA January 27 2003 Atlantic France Spain
from D Rosenfeld Image courtesy of Danniel Rosenfeld Used with permission
Image courtesy of NASA
23
Stephen Salterrsquos design
US Navy
Unpublished results use of particle production in Marine Boundary Layer (MBL) with cloud formation ~1 in 10 times
Image courtesy of US Navy
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpphysicsworldcomcwsarticlenews356931cloud
24
Reward Risk 1 Cool planet 1 Regional droughts 2 Reduce or reverse ice loss 2 Continued ocean acidification 3 Reduce or reverse sea level rise 3 Ozone depletion 4 Increase plant productivity 4 Diffuse radiation effect on plants 5 Nice sunsets 5 Acid deposition 6 Better precipitation control 6 Cirrus effects
7 White skies 8 Lower solar power margins 9 Environmental side effects 10 Cannot stop effects quickly (1-3 years or more) 11 Rapid warming if stopped (all effects back in 1-3 years) 12 Human error 13 Undermining mitigation efforts 14 Cost 15 Who controls Commercialization 16 Military use 17 Whose hand on the thermostat 18 Conflict with treaties 19 ldquoUnknown unknownsrdquo
Robock 2008
What would you propose as a method 1 Model all results first
2 Small scale tests For direct effect method how do you do this 3 Are there effects that canrsquot be accepted
Risk vs Reward
25
As with the example of cheaper natural gas the ldquostop gaprdquo makes a possible ldquolong term solutionrdquo much less likely
Sunlight measured at Mauna Loa The reduction in direct sunlight and increase in diffuse sunlight following the eruption of Mt Pinatuboin 1991 are readily apparent The reduction in total sunlight was much smaller
500
400
300
200
100
1990 1992 1994 1996 19980
Direct
Total
Year
Mau
na L
oa S
olar
Rad
iatio
n (W
m-1
)
100 700
600
500
400
300
200
100
80
60
40
20
0
Annual solar output
Summer on-peak capacity
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998
Year
SEG
S O
n-Pe
ak S
umm
er
Cap
acity
(
)
SEG
S G
ross
Sol
ar
Out
put
(CW
h)
Output of the solar electric generating systems (SEGS) solar thermalpower plants in California (data are from ref 9) The SEGS plants had significant reductions in on-peak capacity and total output following the eruption of Mt Pinatubo
Diffuse
A
B
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
Effect of Stratospheric Aerosols on Direct Sunlight and Implications for Concentrating Solar Power
DANIEL M MURPHYEarth system research laboratory Chemical sciences division National oceanic and atmospheric administration 325 Broadway Boulder Colorado 80305
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
26
Summer sea ice
goes away with a
doubling of CO2
Ice returns with
geoengineering
(but not
homogeneously)
It is possible to
overdo the effect
Rasch et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see Figure 2 in httpiopscienceioporg1748-932644045112fulltext
27
Model 2 (NASA GISS)
Model 1 (Hadley)
Jones et al 2010
Precipitation change from stratospheric sulfate
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 4in httpwwwatmos-chem-physnet1059992010acp-10-5999-2010pdf
28
Precipitation change from marine cloud seeding
Jones et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure4 in httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292008JD011450full
29
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
30
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
This image (published on the Journal of AtmosphericSciences by the American Meteorological Society) iscopyright copy AMS and used with permission
31
Baseline With Geoengineering
Rasch et al 2008
Ethics in research when do you decide to stop researching a topic because the result is too negative When does ldquowe should know more about it in case we try itrdquo conflict with ldquothis is not a good ideardquo
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 8 in httpclimateenvscirutgersedupdfRaschPhilTranspdf
32
ldquoConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniquesrdquo (ENMOD) prohibits the use of the environment as a weapon A result of opposition to Agent Orange and weather modification during Vietnam Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1976 and opened for signature on 18 May 1977 ENMOD entered into force when Laos the twentieth State Party deposited its instrument of ratification on 5 October 1978
Map wikipedia 33
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpenwikipediaorgwikiFileENMOD_Participationsvg
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms
The Direct Effect Method
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
Say we want to ldquooffsetrdquo current ~075deg C warming Pinatubo was ~15 Tg SO2 injection Some variation of initial injection of ~20 Tg sulfuric acid and then an increasing yearly amount of 10+ Tg Aircraft balloon and other lsquodesignsrsquo (25km tethered hose) proposed
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the third image on page httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
20
The Indirect Effect Method
IPCC 2007
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 210 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
21
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Anthropogenic Example
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 6on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
22
NASA January 27 2003 Atlantic France Spain
from D Rosenfeld Image courtesy of Danniel Rosenfeld Used with permission
Image courtesy of NASA
23
Stephen Salterrsquos design
US Navy
Unpublished results use of particle production in Marine Boundary Layer (MBL) with cloud formation ~1 in 10 times
Image courtesy of US Navy
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpphysicsworldcomcwsarticlenews356931cloud
24
Reward Risk 1 Cool planet 1 Regional droughts 2 Reduce or reverse ice loss 2 Continued ocean acidification 3 Reduce or reverse sea level rise 3 Ozone depletion 4 Increase plant productivity 4 Diffuse radiation effect on plants 5 Nice sunsets 5 Acid deposition 6 Better precipitation control 6 Cirrus effects
7 White skies 8 Lower solar power margins 9 Environmental side effects 10 Cannot stop effects quickly (1-3 years or more) 11 Rapid warming if stopped (all effects back in 1-3 years) 12 Human error 13 Undermining mitigation efforts 14 Cost 15 Who controls Commercialization 16 Military use 17 Whose hand on the thermostat 18 Conflict with treaties 19 ldquoUnknown unknownsrdquo
Robock 2008
What would you propose as a method 1 Model all results first
2 Small scale tests For direct effect method how do you do this 3 Are there effects that canrsquot be accepted
Risk vs Reward
25
As with the example of cheaper natural gas the ldquostop gaprdquo makes a possible ldquolong term solutionrdquo much less likely
Sunlight measured at Mauna Loa The reduction in direct sunlight and increase in diffuse sunlight following the eruption of Mt Pinatuboin 1991 are readily apparent The reduction in total sunlight was much smaller
500
400
300
200
100
1990 1992 1994 1996 19980
Direct
Total
Year
Mau
na L
oa S
olar
Rad
iatio
n (W
m-1
)
100 700
600
500
400
300
200
100
80
60
40
20
0
Annual solar output
Summer on-peak capacity
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998
Year
SEG
S O
n-Pe
ak S
umm
er
Cap
acity
(
)
SEG
S G
ross
Sol
ar
Out
put
(CW
h)
Output of the solar electric generating systems (SEGS) solar thermalpower plants in California (data are from ref 9) The SEGS plants had significant reductions in on-peak capacity and total output following the eruption of Mt Pinatubo
Diffuse
A
B
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
Effect of Stratospheric Aerosols on Direct Sunlight and Implications for Concentrating Solar Power
DANIEL M MURPHYEarth system research laboratory Chemical sciences division National oceanic and atmospheric administration 325 Broadway Boulder Colorado 80305
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
26
Summer sea ice
goes away with a
doubling of CO2
Ice returns with
geoengineering
(but not
homogeneously)
It is possible to
overdo the effect
Rasch et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see Figure 2 in httpiopscienceioporg1748-932644045112fulltext
27
Model 2 (NASA GISS)
Model 1 (Hadley)
Jones et al 2010
Precipitation change from stratospheric sulfate
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 4in httpwwwatmos-chem-physnet1059992010acp-10-5999-2010pdf
28
Precipitation change from marine cloud seeding
Jones et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure4 in httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292008JD011450full
29
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
30
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
This image (published on the Journal of AtmosphericSciences by the American Meteorological Society) iscopyright copy AMS and used with permission
31
Baseline With Geoengineering
Rasch et al 2008
Ethics in research when do you decide to stop researching a topic because the result is too negative When does ldquowe should know more about it in case we try itrdquo conflict with ldquothis is not a good ideardquo
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 8 in httpclimateenvscirutgersedupdfRaschPhilTranspdf
32
ldquoConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniquesrdquo (ENMOD) prohibits the use of the environment as a weapon A result of opposition to Agent Orange and weather modification during Vietnam Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1976 and opened for signature on 18 May 1977 ENMOD entered into force when Laos the twentieth State Party deposited its instrument of ratification on 5 October 1978
Map wikipedia 33
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpenwikipediaorgwikiFileENMOD_Participationsvg
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms
The Indirect Effect Method
IPCC 2007
Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Figure 210 Cambridge University Press Used with permission
21
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Anthropogenic Example
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 6on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
22
NASA January 27 2003 Atlantic France Spain
from D Rosenfeld Image courtesy of Danniel Rosenfeld Used with permission
Image courtesy of NASA
23
Stephen Salterrsquos design
US Navy
Unpublished results use of particle production in Marine Boundary Layer (MBL) with cloud formation ~1 in 10 times
Image courtesy of US Navy
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpphysicsworldcomcwsarticlenews356931cloud
24
Reward Risk 1 Cool planet 1 Regional droughts 2 Reduce or reverse ice loss 2 Continued ocean acidification 3 Reduce or reverse sea level rise 3 Ozone depletion 4 Increase plant productivity 4 Diffuse radiation effect on plants 5 Nice sunsets 5 Acid deposition 6 Better precipitation control 6 Cirrus effects
7 White skies 8 Lower solar power margins 9 Environmental side effects 10 Cannot stop effects quickly (1-3 years or more) 11 Rapid warming if stopped (all effects back in 1-3 years) 12 Human error 13 Undermining mitigation efforts 14 Cost 15 Who controls Commercialization 16 Military use 17 Whose hand on the thermostat 18 Conflict with treaties 19 ldquoUnknown unknownsrdquo
Robock 2008
What would you propose as a method 1 Model all results first
2 Small scale tests For direct effect method how do you do this 3 Are there effects that canrsquot be accepted
Risk vs Reward
25
As with the example of cheaper natural gas the ldquostop gaprdquo makes a possible ldquolong term solutionrdquo much less likely
Sunlight measured at Mauna Loa The reduction in direct sunlight and increase in diffuse sunlight following the eruption of Mt Pinatuboin 1991 are readily apparent The reduction in total sunlight was much smaller
500
400
300
200
100
1990 1992 1994 1996 19980
Direct
Total
Year
Mau
na L
oa S
olar
Rad
iatio
n (W
m-1
)
100 700
600
500
400
300
200
100
80
60
40
20
0
Annual solar output
Summer on-peak capacity
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998
Year
SEG
S O
n-Pe
ak S
umm
er
Cap
acity
(
)
SEG
S G
ross
Sol
ar
Out
put
(CW
h)
Output of the solar electric generating systems (SEGS) solar thermalpower plants in California (data are from ref 9) The SEGS plants had significant reductions in on-peak capacity and total output following the eruption of Mt Pinatubo
Diffuse
A
B
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
Effect of Stratospheric Aerosols on Direct Sunlight and Implications for Concentrating Solar Power
DANIEL M MURPHYEarth system research laboratory Chemical sciences division National oceanic and atmospheric administration 325 Broadway Boulder Colorado 80305
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
26
Summer sea ice
goes away with a
doubling of CO2
Ice returns with
geoengineering
(but not
homogeneously)
It is possible to
overdo the effect
Rasch et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see Figure 2 in httpiopscienceioporg1748-932644045112fulltext
27
Model 2 (NASA GISS)
Model 1 (Hadley)
Jones et al 2010
Precipitation change from stratospheric sulfate
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 4in httpwwwatmos-chem-physnet1059992010acp-10-5999-2010pdf
28
Precipitation change from marine cloud seeding
Jones et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure4 in httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292008JD011450full
29
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
30
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
This image (published on the Journal of AtmosphericSciences by the American Meteorological Society) iscopyright copy AMS and used with permission
31
Baseline With Geoengineering
Rasch et al 2008
Ethics in research when do you decide to stop researching a topic because the result is too negative When does ldquowe should know more about it in case we try itrdquo conflict with ldquothis is not a good ideardquo
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 8 in httpclimateenvscirutgersedupdfRaschPhilTranspdf
32
ldquoConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniquesrdquo (ENMOD) prohibits the use of the environment as a weapon A result of opposition to Agent Orange and weather modification during Vietnam Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1976 and opened for signature on 18 May 1977 ENMOD entered into force when Laos the twentieth State Party deposited its instrument of ratification on 5 October 1978
Map wikipedia 33
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpenwikipediaorgwikiFileENMOD_Participationsvg
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms
Murphy et al JGR 2009
Anthropogenic Example
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 6on page httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292009JD012105full
22
NASA January 27 2003 Atlantic France Spain
from D Rosenfeld Image courtesy of Danniel Rosenfeld Used with permission
Image courtesy of NASA
23
Stephen Salterrsquos design
US Navy
Unpublished results use of particle production in Marine Boundary Layer (MBL) with cloud formation ~1 in 10 times
Image courtesy of US Navy
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpphysicsworldcomcwsarticlenews356931cloud
24
Reward Risk 1 Cool planet 1 Regional droughts 2 Reduce or reverse ice loss 2 Continued ocean acidification 3 Reduce or reverse sea level rise 3 Ozone depletion 4 Increase plant productivity 4 Diffuse radiation effect on plants 5 Nice sunsets 5 Acid deposition 6 Better precipitation control 6 Cirrus effects
7 White skies 8 Lower solar power margins 9 Environmental side effects 10 Cannot stop effects quickly (1-3 years or more) 11 Rapid warming if stopped (all effects back in 1-3 years) 12 Human error 13 Undermining mitigation efforts 14 Cost 15 Who controls Commercialization 16 Military use 17 Whose hand on the thermostat 18 Conflict with treaties 19 ldquoUnknown unknownsrdquo
Robock 2008
What would you propose as a method 1 Model all results first
2 Small scale tests For direct effect method how do you do this 3 Are there effects that canrsquot be accepted
Risk vs Reward
25
As with the example of cheaper natural gas the ldquostop gaprdquo makes a possible ldquolong term solutionrdquo much less likely
Sunlight measured at Mauna Loa The reduction in direct sunlight and increase in diffuse sunlight following the eruption of Mt Pinatuboin 1991 are readily apparent The reduction in total sunlight was much smaller
500
400
300
200
100
1990 1992 1994 1996 19980
Direct
Total
Year
Mau
na L
oa S
olar
Rad
iatio
n (W
m-1
)
100 700
600
500
400
300
200
100
80
60
40
20
0
Annual solar output
Summer on-peak capacity
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998
Year
SEG
S O
n-Pe
ak S
umm
er
Cap
acity
(
)
SEG
S G
ross
Sol
ar
Out
put
(CW
h)
Output of the solar electric generating systems (SEGS) solar thermalpower plants in California (data are from ref 9) The SEGS plants had significant reductions in on-peak capacity and total output following the eruption of Mt Pinatubo
Diffuse
A
B
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
Effect of Stratospheric Aerosols on Direct Sunlight and Implications for Concentrating Solar Power
DANIEL M MURPHYEarth system research laboratory Chemical sciences division National oceanic and atmospheric administration 325 Broadway Boulder Colorado 80305
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
26
Summer sea ice
goes away with a
doubling of CO2
Ice returns with
geoengineering
(but not
homogeneously)
It is possible to
overdo the effect
Rasch et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see Figure 2 in httpiopscienceioporg1748-932644045112fulltext
27
Model 2 (NASA GISS)
Model 1 (Hadley)
Jones et al 2010
Precipitation change from stratospheric sulfate
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 4in httpwwwatmos-chem-physnet1059992010acp-10-5999-2010pdf
28
Precipitation change from marine cloud seeding
Jones et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure4 in httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292008JD011450full
29
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
30
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
This image (published on the Journal of AtmosphericSciences by the American Meteorological Society) iscopyright copy AMS and used with permission
31
Baseline With Geoengineering
Rasch et al 2008
Ethics in research when do you decide to stop researching a topic because the result is too negative When does ldquowe should know more about it in case we try itrdquo conflict with ldquothis is not a good ideardquo
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 8 in httpclimateenvscirutgersedupdfRaschPhilTranspdf
32
ldquoConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniquesrdquo (ENMOD) prohibits the use of the environment as a weapon A result of opposition to Agent Orange and weather modification during Vietnam Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1976 and opened for signature on 18 May 1977 ENMOD entered into force when Laos the twentieth State Party deposited its instrument of ratification on 5 October 1978
Map wikipedia 33
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpenwikipediaorgwikiFileENMOD_Participationsvg
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms
NASA January 27 2003 Atlantic France Spain
from D Rosenfeld Image courtesy of Danniel Rosenfeld Used with permission
Image courtesy of NASA
23
Stephen Salterrsquos design
US Navy
Unpublished results use of particle production in Marine Boundary Layer (MBL) with cloud formation ~1 in 10 times
Image courtesy of US Navy
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpphysicsworldcomcwsarticlenews356931cloud
24
Reward Risk 1 Cool planet 1 Regional droughts 2 Reduce or reverse ice loss 2 Continued ocean acidification 3 Reduce or reverse sea level rise 3 Ozone depletion 4 Increase plant productivity 4 Diffuse radiation effect on plants 5 Nice sunsets 5 Acid deposition 6 Better precipitation control 6 Cirrus effects
7 White skies 8 Lower solar power margins 9 Environmental side effects 10 Cannot stop effects quickly (1-3 years or more) 11 Rapid warming if stopped (all effects back in 1-3 years) 12 Human error 13 Undermining mitigation efforts 14 Cost 15 Who controls Commercialization 16 Military use 17 Whose hand on the thermostat 18 Conflict with treaties 19 ldquoUnknown unknownsrdquo
Robock 2008
What would you propose as a method 1 Model all results first
2 Small scale tests For direct effect method how do you do this 3 Are there effects that canrsquot be accepted
Risk vs Reward
25
As with the example of cheaper natural gas the ldquostop gaprdquo makes a possible ldquolong term solutionrdquo much less likely
Sunlight measured at Mauna Loa The reduction in direct sunlight and increase in diffuse sunlight following the eruption of Mt Pinatuboin 1991 are readily apparent The reduction in total sunlight was much smaller
500
400
300
200
100
1990 1992 1994 1996 19980
Direct
Total
Year
Mau
na L
oa S
olar
Rad
iatio
n (W
m-1
)
100 700
600
500
400
300
200
100
80
60
40
20
0
Annual solar output
Summer on-peak capacity
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998
Year
SEG
S O
n-Pe
ak S
umm
er
Cap
acity
(
)
SEG
S G
ross
Sol
ar
Out
put
(CW
h)
Output of the solar electric generating systems (SEGS) solar thermalpower plants in California (data are from ref 9) The SEGS plants had significant reductions in on-peak capacity and total output following the eruption of Mt Pinatubo
Diffuse
A
B
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
Effect of Stratospheric Aerosols on Direct Sunlight and Implications for Concentrating Solar Power
DANIEL M MURPHYEarth system research laboratory Chemical sciences division National oceanic and atmospheric administration 325 Broadway Boulder Colorado 80305
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
26
Summer sea ice
goes away with a
doubling of CO2
Ice returns with
geoengineering
(but not
homogeneously)
It is possible to
overdo the effect
Rasch et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see Figure 2 in httpiopscienceioporg1748-932644045112fulltext
27
Model 2 (NASA GISS)
Model 1 (Hadley)
Jones et al 2010
Precipitation change from stratospheric sulfate
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 4in httpwwwatmos-chem-physnet1059992010acp-10-5999-2010pdf
28
Precipitation change from marine cloud seeding
Jones et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure4 in httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292008JD011450full
29
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
30
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
This image (published on the Journal of AtmosphericSciences by the American Meteorological Society) iscopyright copy AMS and used with permission
31
Baseline With Geoengineering
Rasch et al 2008
Ethics in research when do you decide to stop researching a topic because the result is too negative When does ldquowe should know more about it in case we try itrdquo conflict with ldquothis is not a good ideardquo
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 8 in httpclimateenvscirutgersedupdfRaschPhilTranspdf
32
ldquoConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniquesrdquo (ENMOD) prohibits the use of the environment as a weapon A result of opposition to Agent Orange and weather modification during Vietnam Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1976 and opened for signature on 18 May 1977 ENMOD entered into force when Laos the twentieth State Party deposited its instrument of ratification on 5 October 1978
Map wikipedia 33
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpenwikipediaorgwikiFileENMOD_Participationsvg
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms
Stephen Salterrsquos design
US Navy
Unpublished results use of particle production in Marine Boundary Layer (MBL) with cloud formation ~1 in 10 times
Image courtesy of US Navy
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see the image on page httpphysicsworldcomcwsarticlenews356931cloud
24
Reward Risk 1 Cool planet 1 Regional droughts 2 Reduce or reverse ice loss 2 Continued ocean acidification 3 Reduce or reverse sea level rise 3 Ozone depletion 4 Increase plant productivity 4 Diffuse radiation effect on plants 5 Nice sunsets 5 Acid deposition 6 Better precipitation control 6 Cirrus effects
7 White skies 8 Lower solar power margins 9 Environmental side effects 10 Cannot stop effects quickly (1-3 years or more) 11 Rapid warming if stopped (all effects back in 1-3 years) 12 Human error 13 Undermining mitigation efforts 14 Cost 15 Who controls Commercialization 16 Military use 17 Whose hand on the thermostat 18 Conflict with treaties 19 ldquoUnknown unknownsrdquo
Robock 2008
What would you propose as a method 1 Model all results first
2 Small scale tests For direct effect method how do you do this 3 Are there effects that canrsquot be accepted
Risk vs Reward
25
As with the example of cheaper natural gas the ldquostop gaprdquo makes a possible ldquolong term solutionrdquo much less likely
Sunlight measured at Mauna Loa The reduction in direct sunlight and increase in diffuse sunlight following the eruption of Mt Pinatuboin 1991 are readily apparent The reduction in total sunlight was much smaller
500
400
300
200
100
1990 1992 1994 1996 19980
Direct
Total
Year
Mau
na L
oa S
olar
Rad
iatio
n (W
m-1
)
100 700
600
500
400
300
200
100
80
60
40
20
0
Annual solar output
Summer on-peak capacity
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998
Year
SEG
S O
n-Pe
ak S
umm
er
Cap
acity
(
)
SEG
S G
ross
Sol
ar
Out
put
(CW
h)
Output of the solar electric generating systems (SEGS) solar thermalpower plants in California (data are from ref 9) The SEGS plants had significant reductions in on-peak capacity and total output following the eruption of Mt Pinatubo
Diffuse
A
B
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
Effect of Stratospheric Aerosols on Direct Sunlight and Implications for Concentrating Solar Power
DANIEL M MURPHYEarth system research laboratory Chemical sciences division National oceanic and atmospheric administration 325 Broadway Boulder Colorado 80305
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
26
Summer sea ice
goes away with a
doubling of CO2
Ice returns with
geoengineering
(but not
homogeneously)
It is possible to
overdo the effect
Rasch et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see Figure 2 in httpiopscienceioporg1748-932644045112fulltext
27
Model 2 (NASA GISS)
Model 1 (Hadley)
Jones et al 2010
Precipitation change from stratospheric sulfate
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 4in httpwwwatmos-chem-physnet1059992010acp-10-5999-2010pdf
28
Precipitation change from marine cloud seeding
Jones et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure4 in httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292008JD011450full
29
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
30
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
This image (published on the Journal of AtmosphericSciences by the American Meteorological Society) iscopyright copy AMS and used with permission
31
Baseline With Geoengineering
Rasch et al 2008
Ethics in research when do you decide to stop researching a topic because the result is too negative When does ldquowe should know more about it in case we try itrdquo conflict with ldquothis is not a good ideardquo
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 8 in httpclimateenvscirutgersedupdfRaschPhilTranspdf
32
ldquoConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniquesrdquo (ENMOD) prohibits the use of the environment as a weapon A result of opposition to Agent Orange and weather modification during Vietnam Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1976 and opened for signature on 18 May 1977 ENMOD entered into force when Laos the twentieth State Party deposited its instrument of ratification on 5 October 1978
Map wikipedia 33
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpenwikipediaorgwikiFileENMOD_Participationsvg
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms
Reward Risk 1 Cool planet 1 Regional droughts 2 Reduce or reverse ice loss 2 Continued ocean acidification 3 Reduce or reverse sea level rise 3 Ozone depletion 4 Increase plant productivity 4 Diffuse radiation effect on plants 5 Nice sunsets 5 Acid deposition 6 Better precipitation control 6 Cirrus effects
7 White skies 8 Lower solar power margins 9 Environmental side effects 10 Cannot stop effects quickly (1-3 years or more) 11 Rapid warming if stopped (all effects back in 1-3 years) 12 Human error 13 Undermining mitigation efforts 14 Cost 15 Who controls Commercialization 16 Military use 17 Whose hand on the thermostat 18 Conflict with treaties 19 ldquoUnknown unknownsrdquo
Robock 2008
What would you propose as a method 1 Model all results first
2 Small scale tests For direct effect method how do you do this 3 Are there effects that canrsquot be accepted
Risk vs Reward
25
As with the example of cheaper natural gas the ldquostop gaprdquo makes a possible ldquolong term solutionrdquo much less likely
Sunlight measured at Mauna Loa The reduction in direct sunlight and increase in diffuse sunlight following the eruption of Mt Pinatuboin 1991 are readily apparent The reduction in total sunlight was much smaller
500
400
300
200
100
1990 1992 1994 1996 19980
Direct
Total
Year
Mau
na L
oa S
olar
Rad
iatio
n (W
m-1
)
100 700
600
500
400
300
200
100
80
60
40
20
0
Annual solar output
Summer on-peak capacity
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998
Year
SEG
S O
n-Pe
ak S
umm
er
Cap
acity
(
)
SEG
S G
ross
Sol
ar
Out
put
(CW
h)
Output of the solar electric generating systems (SEGS) solar thermalpower plants in California (data are from ref 9) The SEGS plants had significant reductions in on-peak capacity and total output following the eruption of Mt Pinatubo
Diffuse
A
B
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
Effect of Stratospheric Aerosols on Direct Sunlight and Implications for Concentrating Solar Power
DANIEL M MURPHYEarth system research laboratory Chemical sciences division National oceanic and atmospheric administration 325 Broadway Boulder Colorado 80305
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
26
Summer sea ice
goes away with a
doubling of CO2
Ice returns with
geoengineering
(but not
homogeneously)
It is possible to
overdo the effect
Rasch et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see Figure 2 in httpiopscienceioporg1748-932644045112fulltext
27
Model 2 (NASA GISS)
Model 1 (Hadley)
Jones et al 2010
Precipitation change from stratospheric sulfate
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 4in httpwwwatmos-chem-physnet1059992010acp-10-5999-2010pdf
28
Precipitation change from marine cloud seeding
Jones et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure4 in httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292008JD011450full
29
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
30
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
This image (published on the Journal of AtmosphericSciences by the American Meteorological Society) iscopyright copy AMS and used with permission
31
Baseline With Geoengineering
Rasch et al 2008
Ethics in research when do you decide to stop researching a topic because the result is too negative When does ldquowe should know more about it in case we try itrdquo conflict with ldquothis is not a good ideardquo
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 8 in httpclimateenvscirutgersedupdfRaschPhilTranspdf
32
ldquoConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniquesrdquo (ENMOD) prohibits the use of the environment as a weapon A result of opposition to Agent Orange and weather modification during Vietnam Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1976 and opened for signature on 18 May 1977 ENMOD entered into force when Laos the twentieth State Party deposited its instrument of ratification on 5 October 1978
Map wikipedia 33
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpenwikipediaorgwikiFileENMOD_Participationsvg
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms
As with the example of cheaper natural gas the ldquostop gaprdquo makes a possible ldquolong term solutionrdquo much less likely
Sunlight measured at Mauna Loa The reduction in direct sunlight and increase in diffuse sunlight following the eruption of Mt Pinatuboin 1991 are readily apparent The reduction in total sunlight was much smaller
500
400
300
200
100
1990 1992 1994 1996 19980
Direct
Total
Year
Mau
na L
oa S
olar
Rad
iatio
n (W
m-1
)
100 700
600
500
400
300
200
100
80
60
40
20
0
Annual solar output
Summer on-peak capacity
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998
Year
SEG
S O
n-Pe
ak S
umm
er
Cap
acity
(
)
SEG
S G
ross
Sol
ar
Out
put
(CW
h)
Output of the solar electric generating systems (SEGS) solar thermalpower plants in California (data are from ref 9) The SEGS plants had significant reductions in on-peak capacity and total output following the eruption of Mt Pinatubo
Diffuse
A
B
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
Effect of Stratospheric Aerosols on Direct Sunlight and Implications for Concentrating Solar Power
DANIEL M MURPHYEarth system research laboratory Chemical sciences division National oceanic and atmospheric administration 325 Broadway Boulder Colorado 80305
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare
26
Summer sea ice
goes away with a
doubling of CO2
Ice returns with
geoengineering
(but not
homogeneously)
It is possible to
overdo the effect
Rasch et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see Figure 2 in httpiopscienceioporg1748-932644045112fulltext
27
Model 2 (NASA GISS)
Model 1 (Hadley)
Jones et al 2010
Precipitation change from stratospheric sulfate
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 4in httpwwwatmos-chem-physnet1059992010acp-10-5999-2010pdf
28
Precipitation change from marine cloud seeding
Jones et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure4 in httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292008JD011450full
29
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
30
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
This image (published on the Journal of AtmosphericSciences by the American Meteorological Society) iscopyright copy AMS and used with permission
31
Baseline With Geoengineering
Rasch et al 2008
Ethics in research when do you decide to stop researching a topic because the result is too negative When does ldquowe should know more about it in case we try itrdquo conflict with ldquothis is not a good ideardquo
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 8 in httpclimateenvscirutgersedupdfRaschPhilTranspdf
32
ldquoConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniquesrdquo (ENMOD) prohibits the use of the environment as a weapon A result of opposition to Agent Orange and weather modification during Vietnam Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1976 and opened for signature on 18 May 1977 ENMOD entered into force when Laos the twentieth State Party deposited its instrument of ratification on 5 October 1978
Map wikipedia 33
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpenwikipediaorgwikiFileENMOD_Participationsvg
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms
Summer sea ice
goes away with a
doubling of CO2
Ice returns with
geoengineering
(but not
homogeneously)
It is possible to
overdo the effect
Rasch et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictionsPlease see Figure 2 in httpiopscienceioporg1748-932644045112fulltext
27
Model 2 (NASA GISS)
Model 1 (Hadley)
Jones et al 2010
Precipitation change from stratospheric sulfate
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 4in httpwwwatmos-chem-physnet1059992010acp-10-5999-2010pdf
28
Precipitation change from marine cloud seeding
Jones et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure4 in httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292008JD011450full
29
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
30
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
This image (published on the Journal of AtmosphericSciences by the American Meteorological Society) iscopyright copy AMS and used with permission
31
Baseline With Geoengineering
Rasch et al 2008
Ethics in research when do you decide to stop researching a topic because the result is too negative When does ldquowe should know more about it in case we try itrdquo conflict with ldquothis is not a good ideardquo
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 8 in httpclimateenvscirutgersedupdfRaschPhilTranspdf
32
ldquoConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniquesrdquo (ENMOD) prohibits the use of the environment as a weapon A result of opposition to Agent Orange and weather modification during Vietnam Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1976 and opened for signature on 18 May 1977 ENMOD entered into force when Laos the twentieth State Party deposited its instrument of ratification on 5 October 1978
Map wikipedia 33
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpenwikipediaorgwikiFileENMOD_Participationsvg
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms
Model 2 (NASA GISS)
Model 1 (Hadley)
Jones et al 2010
Precipitation change from stratospheric sulfate
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure 4in httpwwwatmos-chem-physnet1059992010acp-10-5999-2010pdf
28
Precipitation change from marine cloud seeding
Jones et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure4 in httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292008JD011450full
29
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
30
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
This image (published on the Journal of AtmosphericSciences by the American Meteorological Society) iscopyright copy AMS and used with permission
31
Baseline With Geoengineering
Rasch et al 2008
Ethics in research when do you decide to stop researching a topic because the result is too negative When does ldquowe should know more about it in case we try itrdquo conflict with ldquothis is not a good ideardquo
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 8 in httpclimateenvscirutgersedupdfRaschPhilTranspdf
32
ldquoConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniquesrdquo (ENMOD) prohibits the use of the environment as a weapon A result of opposition to Agent Orange and weather modification during Vietnam Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1976 and opened for signature on 18 May 1977 ENMOD entered into force when Laos the twentieth State Party deposited its instrument of ratification on 5 October 1978
Map wikipedia 33
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpenwikipediaorgwikiFileENMOD_Participationsvg
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms
Precipitation change from marine cloud seeding
Jones et al 2009
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see Figure4 in httponlinelibrarywileycomdoi1010292008JD011450full
29
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
30
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
This image (published on the Journal of AtmosphericSciences by the American Meteorological Society) iscopyright copy AMS and used with permission
31
Baseline With Geoengineering
Rasch et al 2008
Ethics in research when do you decide to stop researching a topic because the result is too negative When does ldquowe should know more about it in case we try itrdquo conflict with ldquothis is not a good ideardquo
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 8 in httpclimateenvscirutgersedupdfRaschPhilTranspdf
32
ldquoConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniquesrdquo (ENMOD) prohibits the use of the environment as a weapon A result of opposition to Agent Orange and weather modification during Vietnam Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1976 and opened for signature on 18 May 1977 ENMOD entered into force when Laos the twentieth State Party deposited its instrument of ratification on 5 October 1978
Map wikipedia 33
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpenwikipediaorgwikiFileENMOD_Participationsvg
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
30
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
This image (published on the Journal of AtmosphericSciences by the American Meteorological Society) iscopyright copy AMS and used with permission
31
Baseline With Geoengineering
Rasch et al 2008
Ethics in research when do you decide to stop researching a topic because the result is too negative When does ldquowe should know more about it in case we try itrdquo conflict with ldquothis is not a good ideardquo
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 8 in httpclimateenvscirutgersedupdfRaschPhilTranspdf
32
ldquoConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniquesrdquo (ENMOD) prohibits the use of the environment as a weapon A result of opposition to Agent Orange and weather modification during Vietnam Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1976 and opened for signature on 18 May 1977 ENMOD entered into force when Laos the twentieth State Party deposited its instrument of ratification on 5 October 1978
Map wikipedia 33
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpenwikipediaorgwikiFileENMOD_Participationsvg
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms
The Ozone Effect
Image courtesy of NOAA
This image (published on the Journal of AtmosphericSciences by the American Meteorological Society) iscopyright copy AMS and used with permission
31
Baseline With Geoengineering
Rasch et al 2008
Ethics in research when do you decide to stop researching a topic because the result is too negative When does ldquowe should know more about it in case we try itrdquo conflict with ldquothis is not a good ideardquo
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 8 in httpclimateenvscirutgersedupdfRaschPhilTranspdf
32
ldquoConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniquesrdquo (ENMOD) prohibits the use of the environment as a weapon A result of opposition to Agent Orange and weather modification during Vietnam Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1976 and opened for signature on 18 May 1977 ENMOD entered into force when Laos the twentieth State Party deposited its instrument of ratification on 5 October 1978
Map wikipedia 33
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpenwikipediaorgwikiFileENMOD_Participationsvg
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms
Baseline With Geoengineering
Rasch et al 2008
Ethics in research when do you decide to stop researching a topic because the result is too negative When does ldquowe should know more about it in case we try itrdquo conflict with ldquothis is not a good ideardquo
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please seeFigure 8 in httpclimateenvscirutgersedupdfRaschPhilTranspdf
32
ldquoConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniquesrdquo (ENMOD) prohibits the use of the environment as a weapon A result of opposition to Agent Orange and weather modification during Vietnam Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1976 and opened for signature on 18 May 1977 ENMOD entered into force when Laos the twentieth State Party deposited its instrument of ratification on 5 October 1978
Map wikipedia 33
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpenwikipediaorgwikiFileENMOD_Participationsvg
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms
ldquoConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniquesrdquo (ENMOD) prohibits the use of the environment as a weapon A result of opposition to Agent Orange and weather modification during Vietnam Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1976 and opened for signature on 18 May 1977 ENMOD entered into force when Laos the twentieth State Party deposited its instrument of ratification on 5 October 1978
Map wikipedia 33
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see theimage on page httpenwikipediaorgwikiFileENMOD_Participationsvg
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms
For you to consider
1 Have we shown that the ldquocurerdquo is better than the ldquodiseaserdquo 2 Is this really the same as what wersquove already done (ldquoinadvertentrdquo
climate modification) 3 If this is a ldquolast resortrdquo are we certain it is going to work
httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomenergy24157
This image has been removed due to copyright restrictions Please see the second image onpage httpwwwtechnologyreviewcomfeaturedstory416801the-geoengineering-gambit
34
MIT OpenCourseWarehttpocwmitedu
12340 Global Warming ScienceSpring 2012 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use visit httpocwmiteduterms