2
 COMMITTEES Banks Cities Consumer Affairs and Protection MICAH Z. KELLNER Assembly Member, 65 th District December 19, 2012 Dennis Walcott Chancellor New York City Department of Education 52 Chambers Street New York, NY 10007 Dear Chancellor Walcott: I am writing in regards to a recent change by the New York City Department of Education without first obtaining the requisite approval, that eliminates preferences in admissions to Gifted and Talented (G&T) programs for siblings of current students. Parents throughout Community Education District 2 who are parents of G&T students have contacted my office protesting this change, which now gives preference to siblings only as a tiebreaker in the case of identical scores on the G&T test. Parents have expressed concerns that, while G&T siblings will no longer receive this preference, siblings will continue to receive preference at non-G&T programs throughout the City. This policy change will also require many parents to transport their children to and from different schools—frequently within different school zones—placing an obvious and tremendous strain on parents’ ability to balance parenting and working. For this reason, parents have requested that the decision to eliminate the longstanding sibling preference for G&T programs policy be reversed and that parents of current students be grandfathered in through the new policy whether or not the policy is reversed. Equally disturbing, however, was that the DOE implemented this radical shift to a policy set forth in Chancellor’s Regulation A-101 without allowing f or any public comment—as is required by New York State Education Law § 2590-g—or issuing any public notice. The Panel for Education Policy (PEP) is not scheduled to vote on this change to sibling preferences until December 20, 2012 y et the DOE included the new policy in a G&T handbook it published in October 2012. It is unacceptable for the DOE to implement a material change to admissions policy without a public hearing. It sends an arrogant message to parents that their valuable feedback is meaningless to DOE. I request that DOE immediately reinstate the G&T sibling preference until a public hearing is held, and strongly urge that DOE heed the input of the parents it is supposed to s erve before putting forward to the PEP any amendment to Ch ancellor’s Regulations. Sincerely, Micah Z. Kellner Member of Assembly ALBANY OFFICE: Room 654, Legislative Office Building, Albany, New York 12248 • 518-455-5676, FAX: 518-455-5282 DISTRICT OFFICE: 1365 First Avenue, New York, New York 10021 • 212-860-4906, FAX: 917-432-2983 EMAIL: [email protected] THE ASSEMBLY STATE OF NEW YORK ALBANY Racing and Wagering Steering

12.19.12 Letter to Chancellor Walcott_Gifted and Talented Program

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 12.19.12 Letter to Chancellor Walcott_Gifted and Talented Program

7/30/2019 12.19.12 Letter to Chancellor Walcott_Gifted and Talented Program

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/121912-letter-to-chancellor-walcottgifted-and-talented-program 1/1

 

COMMITTEES

Banks

Cities

Consumer Affairs and Protection

MICAH Z. KELLNER

Assembly Member, 65th

District

December 19, 2012

Dennis Walcott

ChancellorNew York City Department of Education

52 Chambers StreetNew York, NY 10007

Dear Chancellor Walcott:

I am writing in regards to a recent change by the New York City Department of 

Education without first obtaining the requisite approval, that eliminates preferences inadmissions to Gifted and Talented (G&T) programs for siblings of current students. Parents

throughout Community Education District 2 who are parents of G&T students have contactedmy office protesting this change, which now gives preference to siblings only as a tiebreaker in

the case of identical scores on the G&T test.

Parents have expressed concerns that, while G&T siblings will no longer receive thispreference, siblings will continue to receive preference at non-G&T programs throughout the

City. This policy change will also require many parents to transport their children to and fromdifferent schools—frequently within different school zones—placing an obvious and tremendous

strain on parents’ ability to balance parenting and working. For this reason, parents haverequested that the decision to eliminate the longstanding sibling preference for G&T programs

policy be reversed and that parents of current students be grandfathered in through the newpolicy whether or not the policy is reversed.

Equally disturbing, however, was that the DOE implemented this radical shift to a policy

set forth in Chancellor’s Regulation A-101 without allowing for any public comment—as isrequired by New York State Education Law § 2590-g—or issuing any public notice. The Panel

for Education Policy (PEP) is not scheduled to vote on this change to sibling preferences untilDecember 20, 2012 yet the DOE included the new policy in a G&T handbook it published in

October 2012.

It is unacceptable for the DOE to implement a material change to admissions policywithout a public hearing. It sends an arrogant message to parents that their valuable feedback is

meaningless to DOE. I request that DOE immediately reinstate the G&T sibling preference until

a public hearing is held, and strongly urge that DOE heed the input of the parents it is supposedto serve before putting forward to the PEP any amendment to Chancellor’s Regulations.

Sincerely,

Micah Z. KellnerMember of Assembly

ALBANY OFFICE: Room 654, Legislative Office Building, Albany, New York 12248 • 518-455-5676, FAX: 518-455-5282DISTRICT OFFICE: 1365 First Avenue, New York, New York 10021 • 212-860-4906, FAX: 917-432-2983

EMAIL: [email protected] 

THE ASSEMBLY

STATE OF NEW YORK

ALBANYRacing and Wagering

Steering