24
YOUR PARTNER FOR COMPLETE POWER PLANT SOLUTIONS A PRESENTATION ON INDO-GERMAN ENERGY PROGRAMME WORKSHOP ON “Renovation & Modernization and Water Optimization in Thermal Power Stations” AT HOTEL TAJMAHAL , MANSINGH ROAD NEW DELHI 30 th June, 2009 BY DINESH B SINGH MD (ENERGO ENGINEERING PROJECTS LIMITED) DRY CONDENSER COOLING SYSTEMS FOR THERMAL POWER STATIONS

11CEA

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

11CEA

Citation preview

  • YOUR PARTNER FOR COMPLETE POWER PLANT SOLUTIONS

    A PRESENTATION ON

    INDO-GERMAN ENERGY PROGRAMMEWORKSHOP ON

    Renovation & Modernization and Water Optimization

    in Thermal Power StationsAT HOTEL TAJMAHAL , MANSINGH ROAD NEW DELHI

    30th June, 2009

    BY

    DINESH B SINGHMD (ENERGO ENGINEERING PROJECTS LIMITED)

    DRY CONDENSER COOLING SYSTEMS FOR

    THERMAL POWER STATIONS

  • ENERGO & GEA EGI MoU

    includes...

    Condenser Cooling System

    Condensate Polishing Unit

    DM Plant

    Desalination / Reverse Osmosis

    Zero Effluent Discharge System

    High Concentration Ash Slurry Disposal (HCSD) Systems

    Contracting of Balance of Power Plant Packages

    Visit us at:

    www.energoindia.com /www.egi.hu

  • Cooling System in USA

    Once Through From 1930sWet Cooling From 1950sDry From 1970sHybrid From 1980sParallel From 1990s

    India not even in 1950s

    Let us act before it is too late !

  • Mitigating Limitations

    Evaporative Wet CoolingLimitations

    Wet bulb temperature

    Dry bulb temperature

    Huge Evaporative Water loss

    Limits Plant Location Options

    Limitation for Natural Draft Tower to be in RCC

    High Emission / Effluent Generation

    Forced Power Plant Shutdown Possibilities

    To many Variables Effecting Design Point Availability

    High Auxiliary Power Consumption

    High O&M Costs

    Water Uncertainty w.r.t Social Reaction / Sabotage / Availability / Allocation / Water Intake Land Acquisition

    Direct ACC Limitations

    Layout Restrictions

    Natural Draft Cooling Tower not feasible

    Wind Effects of Flow Separation, Recirculation

    & Mal-Distribution in Forced Draft Systems

    High Fan Power Consumption

    Limitation on Range of Operating Condition

    Low Power plant efficiency

    Poor Availability w.r.t Design Point

    High Noise Emission

    Very High O&M Costs

  • Invented by the founders of EGI (now GEA EGI) 50 years ago

    Dr. Heller Lszl Dr. Forg Lszl

    Rejected heat Q = k x F x DTln, wherek: heat transfer rate (kcal/h,m2,oC) F: heat transfer surface,DTln: logarithmic mean temperature differenceCondenser TTD =

    ~0.5CCondenser TTD =

    ~3C

    Tcold

    Twarm

    Tcold

    Twarm

    Ther

    mo

    dyn

    amic

    lo

    ss o

    f

    surf

    ace

    con

    den

    ser

    With DC Jet Condenser gives 3.5- 4.5 oC ITD Advantage

    The Best use of Ambient Air as Heat Sink

    DC Jet Condenser

    Heller Indirect Dry Cooling System

  • HELLER System: The Way It Works

  • HELLER WET ASSISTED

    0% 50% 100%

    ALL DRY ALL WET

    HELLER SPRAYED

    HEAD

    PLUME ABATEMENT HYBRID

    SERIES SINGLE CIRCUIT HYBRID

    Heat Exch.Water-Water

    Boiler Feed Water

    CondenserDC

    CW Pump

    Recovery Turbine

    Cell

    CoolingWet

    Heat ExchangerWater to Air

    CoolingTower

    Dry

    Steam Turbine

    Steam Turbine

    Condenser

    Boiler Feed Water

    Recovery Turbine

    CW Pump Water to AirHeat Exchanger

    CoolingTower

    Dry

    DC

    Supplemental Spraying Dry-Deluged Coolers

    Heller with Wet Assisted Cells Relative Annual Water Consumption

    Dry/wet HELLER System Combinations

  • The cooling tower can be built either with a conventional reinforcedconcrete shell or with a steel structure covered by corrugated Al- clad.

    Cooling Tower Construction Options

    Concrete Tower

    Steel Tower

    Forced Draft Cooling Tower

    Natural Draft Cooling Towers

  • Environmental Aspects

  • Mtra PS 800 MWe - originally commissioned: 1969-1972

    Retrofitted in 1999-2000 incl. 2 FGD plants each put inside one HELLER tower of a 230 MWe unit, however treating flue gas from 440 MWe capacity.

    Greener & Cheaper : Flue gas exhaust

  • How flue gases are routed from the boiler to the stack-in-tower at the 320 MWe Can TPP

    Greener & Cheaper : Flue gas exhaust

  • Greener & Cheaper : Flue gas exhaust FGD-in-tower

    in the 800 MWe Mtra PS, Hungary

    Stack-in-tower in the 320 MWe Can PS,

    Turkey

    FGD-in-tower

    BaoJi SC PS

    2700 MWe

    Contract: 2007

    Com: 2011

    CPC = 25.5 MWth/K

  • -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

    8

    6,

    4,

    3,

    1,

    0

    -1

    -3

    -4

    -6

    -805

    10152025303540

    SO

    2 [g

    /m3]

    Source Distance W - E [km]

    So

    urc

    e d

    ista

    nce N

    - S [k

    m]

    35-40

    30-35

    25-30

    20-25

    15-20

    10-15

    5-10

    0-5

    N

    Modeling the max. 1-hour SO2concentration at a1616 km area

    Average max. 29 g / m3

    Max.max. 38 g / m3

    BaoJi Supercritical PS 2 700 MWe Owner: Guodian Corp.

    Contract date: Oct. 2007

    To be commissioned: 2011

    CPC = 25.5 MWth/K

    FGD-in-tower to reduce ground level concentration of pollutants

    OT water treatment (similar to EPRI GL)

    Greener & Cheaper : Flue gas exhaust

  • Completely closed circuit, nil effluents

  • Direct ACC (var. D) HELLER System (var. A)

    Impact of cooling systems on noise emmission

    Sound pressure levels around the 800 MWe CCPP equipped with functionally equivalent dry cooling systems: natural draft HELLER System (var. A) and mechanical draft direct ACC (var. D):

    Noise pollution

  • Higher annual efficiency compared to other dry cooling options means lower emission of atmospheric pollutants

    No plume as opposed to wet cooling systems avoids water plume related greenhouse effect

    Greenhouse Gases

  • Typical Performance of 800MW

    Super Critical Coal Based Thermal Power Plant

  • Typical Curve for 800 MW Coal Based

    Super Critical Thermal Power Plant

    Ambient Temperature Range (-27 deg. C to 38 deg. C), Design Point Ambient Temperature (dry bulb) (12.22 deg. C)Design Point Relative Humidity (30%) Site Elevation (5100 feet)

  • The indirect cooling circuit by the high thermal inertia of its water fill buffers or mitigates the negativeeffect of wind gusts, resulting in smaller performance reduction and more stabile turbine back-pressure. Incase of an ACC even a 1-2 minutes long wind gusts affects the cooling, with Heller system only wind gustslasting appr.15-minute are sensible.

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    660 720 780 840 900 960 1020

    Number of measurements

    Win

    d s

    peed

    m/s

    15-minute average wind speed

    2-minute average wind speed

    12:00 hours TIME 14:0013:00 hours

    A so called emergency spraying can be applied whenever high wind is combined with hot ambient airtemperatures, even in case of otherwise all-dry HELLER Systems. Then spraying is selectively applied on themost affected air cooler sections automatically controlled from their outlet water temperature.

    Response to wind effect and its mitigation

  • Capital investment cost (Including Cost of rawwater intake /pumping )

    Difference in annual net generation Water costs Maintenance costs Cost of cooling system related unit unavailability

    Factors Taken Into Consideration

    For Life Cycle Cost Comparison

  • 120 MWe coal fired unit of Rugeley A PS, Great Britain

    Commissioned: 1962 Decommissioned: 1996

    REFERENCES

    The 1st larger PS with HELLER

    Altitude: 1760 m

    In the background: towers of the original plant for 4 x 200 MWe built in the 1970s

    In the foreground: cooling tower to serve 620 MWe supercritical extension (mid 1990)

    Armenia: High altitude & seismicity

    Esfahan PS 1. 4 200 MWe (1980s)

    Esfahan PS 2. 4 200 MWe (1990s)

    Elevation: 1600 m

    Montazer Ghaem CCPP3 360 MWe(1998-2001)+20 units

    Shahid Rajai TPP Elevation: 1400 m 4 250 MWe(1995)

    Arak PS 4 325 MWe (1998-2002) Elevation: 2000 m

  • Russia: frosty winter

    The only dry cooled nuclear PS in the world

    Bilibino NPP 4x12 MWe (1970s)Over the Arctic Belt

    Strogino Co-gen CCPP, 2x200 MWe (2008), winter proof up to -42C(-43.6F)

    Winter cells

    Summer cells

    &

    Moscow City 2. Co-gen CCPP260 MWe, (2008),winter proof up to -42C

    Sochi Co-gen CCPP, 80 MWe (2004) with supplemental spraying; exception: mild climate at the sea shore

    Turkey: superior availabilities

    Trakia CCPP, 1200 MWe (1987-97)EPC: ABB-Enka, Owner: EAS

    1400 MWe Bursa CCPP (1999)EPC: MHI / ENKA ; Owner: EAS

    3 x 777 MWe Gebze & Adapazari CCPP

    (2002)

    Owner: Intergen/Enka

    EPC: Bechtel/Enka

    CAN PP (CFB); 320 MWe 2003/4EPC: Alstom, Owner: EAS

    Turkey

    Parallel delugable cells within the dry tower

    1400 MWe Bursa CCPP (1999)EPC: MHI / ENKA ; Owner: EAS

  • Turkey

    3 x 777 MWe GEBZE & ADAPAZARI CCPP (2002)

    Owner: Intergen/Enka

    EPC Contractor: Bechtel/Enka0

    Worlds largest dry cooled combined cycle power plant

    Syria: sizzling deserts

    Teshrin PS 2 x 210 MWe(1991/1992) Owner: PEEGT

    Al Zara T.P.P. 3 x 220 MWe, (2001)EPC: MHI Owner: PEEGT

    Nasserieh CCPP 540 MWeEPC: Siemens (2007)Owner: PEEGT

    sizzling desertZayzoun CCPP 540 MWe

    EPC: Siemens (2007) Owner: PEEGT

    Deir Ali CCPP 750 MWeEPC: Siemens (2009)

    Owner: PEEGT

    sizzling desert

    China: cool for coal

    Datong PS 2 x 200 MWe (1988)

    BaoJi SC PS

    2 x 700 MWe

    Owner: Guodian Corp.

    Contract: 2007

    Comm: 2011

    CPC = 25.5 MW th / K

    170 m

    84 m

    152 m

    2 x 600 MWe Yangcheng T.P.P. (2007)Owner: Datang Int.

    2 x 600 MWe Yangcheng T.P.P.

  • Thank You for Your Attention!

    GEA EGI with over 24000 MW indirect Dry CoolingInstallations around the world, (from -62 deg.C to+50 deg.C) Beat the myth that Dry CoolingProcesses are not viable in extreme temperatureconditions !