Upload
mwambungup
View
103
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
The author is a lecturer at the Ndola College of Biomedical Sciences in Zambia
Citation preview
08/04/23 2
Cause
• An understanding of the cause of disease is important in the health field not only for prevention but also in diagnosis and the application of correct treatment.
• A cause of a disease is an event,condition,characteristic or a combination of these factors which plays an important role in producing the disease.
08/04/23 3
Causality
• We are interested in finding the causes of diseases because we want to be able to intervene to prevent disease from occurring.
• The ideas about why, where and how are influenced by concepts of diseases and the wider frame of reference in which we operate.
08/04/23 4
Causality
• Logically a cause must precede a disease.
• A cause is termed sufficient when it inevitably produces or initiates a disease
• termed necessary if a disease can not develop in its absence.
• A sufficient cause is not usually a single factor, but often comprises several components.
08/04/23 5
Types of Causes
• Necessary cause–a factor found in all cases
• Sufficient cause–a combination of factors that makes disease inevitable
Causes that act together are classified as necessary and sufficient.
08/04/23 6
• Example: Cigarette smoking is one component of the sufficient cause of lung cancer.
• Smoking is not sufficient in itself to produce the disease.
• Some people smoke for 50 yrs without developing lung cancer; other factors mostly unknown are required.
• However, the cessation of smoking reduces the number of cases of lung cancer in a population even if the other component are not altered.
08/04/23 7
• Each sufficient cause has a necessary cause as a component eg.In a study of an outbreak of food borne infection, it may be found that chicken salad and creamy dessert were both sufficient causes of salmonella diarrhoea.
• The occurrence of salmonella is the necessary cause of this disease.
• Similarly, there are different components in the causation of tuberculosis, but the tubercle bacillus is a necessary cause.
08/04/23 8
• A single component cause is rarely a sufficient cause by itself.
• For example, even exposure to a highly infectious agent such as measles virus does not invariably result in measles disease-the host must be susceptible; other host factors may also play a role.
08/04/23 9
• An agent which rarely causes disease in healthy persons may be pathogenic when other conditions are right.
• Pneumocystits carinii is one such organism, harmlessly colonizing some healthy persons but causing potentially lethal pneumonia in persons whose immune systems have been weakened by HIV.
• Presence of Pneumocystitis carinii organisms is therefore a necessary but not sufficient cause of pneumocystis pneumonia.
08/04/23 10
Factors in causation
• Three types of factor play a part in causation of disease. All may be necessary but they are rarely sufficient to cause a particular disease or state.
• Predisposing factor :sex,age,previous illness • Enabling factors: Low income, poor nutrition,
bad housing, inadequate medical care.• Precipitating factors: Exposure to a specific
agent or noxious agent.
08/04/23 11
Establishing the cause of diseases
• Causal inference:
This is the term used for the process of determining whether observed associations are likely to be causal.
08/04/23 12
Interaction
• The effect of two or more causes acting together is often greater than would be expected on the basis of summing the individual effects:
Lung cancer=Smoking + Asbestos exposure.
08/04/23 13
Sanitary movement
• Cause: a combination of unfavourable living conditions thought to lead to the general burden of disease.
• Where: factors operating at community level were the causes of disease.
• How: Documented mortality rates in different communities and found many associations between mortality rates and these population based variables.
• They took these associations to be proof of causation.
08/04/23 14
Germ theory
• Cause: A single specific agent that inevitably produced specific disease outcome-physical entity, that could be isolated in lab
• Where: Efforts at disease prevention were concentrated at the individual level.
• How:- the agent must be found in every case
-the agent must not be found in other disease.
-should be able to reproduce disease in experimental animals.
08/04/23 15
• Pasteur's work on microorganisms led to the formulation of the following rules by Koch for determining whether a specific living organism causes a particular disease.
08/04/23 16
Koch’s Postulates
08/04/23 17
Multi-causality
• Cause: any factor that plays an essential role in producing an occurrence of diseases i.e. a number of factors act together.
• Where: there are no upper or lower limits to the level at which we could search for causes.
• How: find association between exposure and outcome.
• Decide whether the association is valid considering alternative explanations.
08/04/23 18
Multi-causality
• We do not make judgement about causality on the basis of one association
• We need to take into account other evidence from a number of different sources and the coherence of the association with existing theory and knowledge.
08/04/23 19
Hills Criteria of Causation
• Outlines the minimal conditions needed to establish a causal relationship between two items.
• These criteria were originally presented by Austin Bradford Hill (1897-1991).
• A British medical statistician• As a way of determining the causal link
between a specific factor (e.g. cigarette smoking) and a disease (such as emphysema or lung cancer).
08/04/23 20
• Hill's Criteria form the basis of modern epidemiological research, which attempts to establish scientifically valid causal connections between potential disease agents and the many diseases that afflict humankind.
08/04/23 21
Sir Austin Bradford Hill(1897-1991)
-Temporality
-Strength
-Consistency
-Dose-response relationship– Specificity– Biological plausibility– Coherence– Reversibility (Experimental)– Analogy
08/04/23 22
1.Temporality or Time Sequence
• For judgement of causality to be reasonable, the exposure of interest should precede the outcome by a period of time consistent with biologic mechanism
08/04/23 23
Bradford Hill Criteria
• Temporality Exposure must precede outcome
Exposure Outcome Time
08/04/23 24
2.Strength
• The strength of an association is measured by risk ratio, or odds ratio.
• The stronger the association the more likely it is to be causal.
08/04/23 25
3.Consistency
• Cause-effect relationship can be supported if the outcome is consistency.
• The outcome has been supported by a number of studies conducted by different investigators at various times using various epidemiological study designs (cross-section, case-control or cohort studies) among different populations and cultural setting.
• Have similar results been shown in other studies?
08/04/23 26
4.Biological gradient
• Risk of an outcome increases with an increase in the dose of exposure (dose- response relationship). e.g. the more cigarettes smoked per day, the higher the risk of developing lung cancer.
08/04/23 27
5.Specificity
• This is established when a single putative cause produces a specific effect.
• This is considered by some to be the weakest of all the criteria.
• The diseases attributed to cigarette smoking, for example, do not meet this criteria.
• When specificity of an association is found, it provides additional support for a causal relationship.
• However, absence of specificity in no way negates a causal relationship.
08/04/23 28
6.Biological Plausibility
• Postulated biologic mechanism by which the exposure might reasonably alter the risk of developing the disease.
• For example the belief that the daily consumption of small to moderate amounts of alcohol reduces the risk of developing CHD.
• This is enhanced by the fact that there is a plausible biologic mechanism that alcohol raises high-density lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol.
• Increased levels of which decrease risk of CHD.
08/04/23 29
7.Coherence
• A causal relationship is more likely if it does not conflict with current knowledge about natural history and biology of disease.
08/04/23 30
8.Experimental(Reversibility)
• Causality is supported if removal of the exposure leads to a reduction in the risk of the outcome.
• Provides very strong evidence in favour of causal relationship.
08/04/23 31
9.Analogy
• If we already know that a particular exposure causes a specific outcome, then we are more likely to accept that a similar exposure is the cause for a similar outcome.
• when one class of causal agents is known to have produced an effect, it can easily be accepted that another agent of that class produces a similar effect.
08/04/23 32
• Human papilloma virus causes Cervical cancer.
• Other DNA tumour viruses can induce cancers in humans, and species-specific papillomaviruses can induce cancers in animals.