3
109 Univ of Pangasinan Faculty Union v. Univ of Pangasinan (127 SCRA 691) G.R. No. L-63122 February 20, 1984 Digest by: Lanz Olives Plaintiff: University of Pangasinan Faculty Union Respondent: University of Pangasinan Petition: Petition for certiorari Ponente: Gutierrez, J. FACTS: University of Pangasinan did not entitle its faculty to ECOLA during the semestral break and when it increased its tuition fee, it refused its faculty the salary increase 60% of the incremental proceeds of increased tuition fees. ISSUE/S: WON faculty members of a university are entitled to ECOLA during semestral breaks. RULING/ RATIO: Yes. Per various PDs on ECOLA, ECOLA pay includes LOA without pay.The contention that “the fact of receiving a salary should not be the basis of receiving ECOLA” is without merit as per IRR of Wage Order No. 1: “Allowance for Unworked days: a) All covered employees whether paid on a monthly or daily basis shall be entitled to their daily living allowance when they are paid their basic wage.” The intention of the law is to grant ECOLA upon the payment of basic wages. Hence the principle, “No pay, no ECOLA”. Also applied by analogy is the principle enunciated in the ORI-LCP: “Sec. 4. Principles in Determining Hours Worked… d) The time during which an employee is inactive by reason of interruptions in his work beyond his control shall be considered time either if the imminence of the resumption of work requires the employee’s presence at the place of work or if the interval is too brief to be utilized effectively and gainfully in the employee’s own interest.” DISPOSITIVE: Faculty Union Won.

109 Univ of Pangasinan

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

aDSDASDAsdfsdfsdfssdfsdfsaddsfsdfsdsfsdaffdafddsafsdfsdfdsfsdfsdfdsfdsfsdfddsfsdfsdfsddsfsdfsdfsdfsdf

Citation preview

Page 1: 109 Univ of Pangasinan

109 Univ of Pangasinan Faculty Union v. Univ of Pangasinan (127 SCRA 691)G.R. No. L-63122February 20, 1984

Digest by: Lanz Olives

Plaintiff: University of Pangasinan Faculty UnionRespondent: University of Pangasinan

Petition: Petition for certiorariPonente: Gutierrez, J.

FACTS:University of Pangasinan did not entitle its faculty to ECOLA during the semestral break and when it increased its tuition fee, it refused its faculty the salary increase 60% of the incremental proceeds of increased tuition fees.

ISSUE/S:WON faculty members of a university are entitled to ECOLA during semestral breaks.

RULING/ RATIO:Yes.Per various PDs on ECOLA, ECOLA pay includes LOA without pay.The contention that “the fact of receiving a salary should not be the basis of receiving ECOLA” is without merit as per IRR of Wage Order No. 1: “Allowance for Unworked days: a) All covered employees whether paid on a monthly or daily basis shall be entitled to their daily living allowance when they are paid their basic wage.”

The intention of the law is to grant ECOLA upon the payment of basic wages. Hence the principle, “No pay, no ECOLA”.

Also applied by analogy is the principle enunciated in the ORI-LCP: “Sec. 4. Principles in Determining Hours Worked… d) The time during which an employee is inactive by reason of interruptions in his work beyond his control shall be considered time either if the imminence of the resumption of work requires the employee’s presence at the place of work or if the interval is too brief to be utilized effectively and gainfully in the employee’s own interest.”

DISPOSITIVE: Faculty Union Won.

DOCTRINE: The legal principles of "No work, no pay; No pay, no ECOLA" must necessarily give way to the purpose of the law to augment the income of employees to enable them to cope with the harsh living conditions brought about by inflation; and to protect employees and their wages against the ravages brought by these conditions. Significantly, it is the commitment of the State to protect labor and to provide means by which the difficulties faced by the working force may best be alleviated.

DIGEST RULES:1. Please don’t copy and paste internet digest2. Maximum of two (2) pages only3. FORMAT: should look like photocopied SCRA

a. Font: Times New Roman b. Size: 11c. Margin: Narrow/ 0.5 in all sidesd. Orientation: Landscapee. Columns: twof. Page size: US Letter/ Short/ 8.5x11

4. All files should be in .doc or .docx

Page 2: 109 Univ of Pangasinan

5. FILE NAME SHOULD BE CASE NO. TITLE Ex. 001 De La Salle University v. Miguel CaponongFor the compilation will be made easy

6. If there are complains about poor writing/ digesting skillsa. 1st complain – re-write digestb. 2nd complain – compile the digest for 2 consecutive

weeksc. 3rd complain – will not be allowed to join the digest

group and should not receive any digest copy 7. Make the facts short and precise8. The issue should be listed is only applicable to the topic

indicated in the syllabus9. Everything should be in bullet or numbered form EXCEPT if

there is only one issue10. Submit digest on time for efficient collation of cases11. DIGEST WILL NOT BE POSTED IN OUR GROUPS BUT

SHOULD BE EMAILED TO THE “WEEK COMPILER”12. The assigned student who will compile cases should upload

it on the same day in .doc or .docx and .pdf file13. Below is the digest sample