10 Fundamentos de sintaxis tipológica Bibliografía web WEB Fundamentos... · Inflectional morphology. En T. Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 169240. Cambridge:

1

Referencias bibliográficas

Aissen, J. L. (1987). Tzotzil clause structure. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company. Andrews, A. (2001). Non-canonical A/S marking in Icelandic. En A. Y. Aikhenvald, R.

M. W. Dixon y M. Onishi (eds.), Non-canonical marking of subjects and objects, 85-112. Ámsterdam; Filadelfia: John Benjamins.

Auwera, J. van der (1997). Cosubordination, vol. 63, Working papers in functional grammar. Ámsterdam: Universidad de Ámsterdam.

Baker, M. C. (1988). Incorporation. A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago; Londres: The University of Chicago Press.

— (1996). The polysynthesis parameter. Nueva York; Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bentivoglio, P. y E. C. Weber (1986). A functional approach to subject word order in

spoken Spanish. En O. Jaeggli y C. Silva Corvalán (eds.), Studies in Romance linguistics, 23-40. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

Bentley, D. (2006). Split intransitivity in Italian. Berlín; Nueva York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Bickel, B. (2010). Capturing particulars and universals in clause linkage: a multivariate analysis. En I. Bril (ed.), Clause linking and clause hierarchy: syntax and pragmatics, 51-104. Ámsterdam: John Benjamins.

Bickel, B. y J. Nichols (2007). Inflectional morphology. En T. Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 169-240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

— (2013a). Exponence of selected inflectional formatives. En M. Dryer y M. Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Disponible en: http://wals.info/chapter/21 (12-05-2015).

— (2013b). Fusion of selected inflectional formatives. En M. Dryer y M. Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Disponible en: http://wals.info/chapter/21 (12-05-2015).

Bisang, W. (1998). Adverbiality: the view from the Far East. En J. van der Auwera y D. P. Ó Baoill (eds.), Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe, 641-812. Berlín; Nueva York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Fundamentos de sintaxis tipológica

2

Blake, B. J. (2001). Case. Cambridge, Nueva York: Cambridge University Press. Bogard, S. (1999). Construcciones antipasivas en español. Nueva Revista de Filología

Hispánica, XLVII: 2, 305-327. Bresnan, J. y L. Moshi (1990). Object asymmetries in comparative Bantu syntax.

Linguistic Inquiry, 21: 2, 147-85. Bybee, J. y T. D. Terrell (1990). Análisis semántico del modo en español. En I. Bosque

(ed.), Indicativo y subjuntivo, 145-163. Madrid: Taurus. Brucart, J. M.ª (1987). Sobre la representación sintáctica de las estructuras coordinadas.

Revista Española de Lingüística, 17: 1, 105-130. Campbell, A. (2000). Valency-changing derivations in K’iche’. En R. M. W. Dixon y A.

Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Changing valency: case studies in transitivity, 236-280. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chamoreau, C. (2008). Voz antipasiva en lenguas nominativo-acusativas. El caso del purépecha. Encuentro de Lingüística en el Noroeste, IX, 105-124. Hermosillo: Unison.

Cinque, G. (2011). On double-headed relative clauses. Disponible en: http://lear.unive.it/bitstream/10278/2276/1/Double-headed.RCs.pdf (19-10-2013).

Cole, P. y M. J. Son (2004). The argument structure of verbs with the suffix -kan in Indonesian. Oceanic Linguistics, 43: 2, 339-64.

Company, C. (2001). Multiple dative-marking grammaticalization. Spanish as a special kind of primary object language. Studies in Language, 25: 1, 1-47.

Comrie, B. (1976). The syntax of causative constructions. Cross-languages similarities and divergences. En M. Shibatani (ed.), Syntax and semantics: the grammar of causative constructions, vol. 6, 261-311. Nueva York: Academic Press.

— (1981a). Aspect and voice. En P. Tedeschi y A. Zaenen (eds.), Syntax and semantics. Vol. 14: tense and aspect, 65-78. Nueva York: Seminar Press.

— (1981b). Language universals and linguistic typology, 2.ª ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

— (1982). Grammatical relations in Huichol. En P. J. Hopper y S. A. Thompson (eds.), Syntax and semantics. Studies in transitivity, 95-115. Nueva York; Londres: Academic Press.

— (1983). Switch reference in Huichol: a typological study. En J. Haiman y P. Munro (eds.), Switch reference and universal grammar, 17-38. Ámsterdam: John Benjamins.

— (1998). Rethinking the typology of relative clauses. Language Design, 1, 59-85. — (2008). Subordination, coordination: form, semantics, pragmatics. En E. J. Vajda

(ed.), Subordination and coordination strategies in north asian languages, 1-16. Ámsterdam: John Benjamins.

— (2013). Alignment of case marking of full noun phrases. En M. Dryer y M. Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Disponible en: http://wals.info/chapter/98 (26-10-2015).

Comrie, B. y T. Kuteva (2013). Relativization strategies. En M. Dryer y M. Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute


3

for Evolutionary Anthropology. Disponible en: http://wals.info/chapter/s8 (08-11-2014).

Conti, C. (2005). Pluralidad comitativa. Verba, 32, 275-306. — (2008). Receptores y beneficiarios. Estudio tipológico de la ditransitividad. Múnich:

Lincom Europa. — (2014). Hacia una caracterización gramatical de las relaciones interclausales en

español. Verba, 41, 25-49. Conti, L. (2007). Las completivas en griego antiguo. Sintaxis griega. Manual on-line

Liceus, 1-31. Conti, L. y S. Luraghi (2014). The Ancient Greek partitive genitive in typological

perspective. En S. Luraghi y T. Huumo (eds.), Partitive cases and related categories, 443-476. Berlín; Nueva York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Cooreman, A. (1994). A functional typology of antipassives. En B. Fox y P. J. Hopper (eds.), Voice: form and function, 49-88. Filadelfia: John Benjamins.

Corbett, G. G. (1983). Resolutions rules: agreement in person, number, and gender. En G. Gazdar et al. (eds.), Order, concord, and constituency, 175-206. Dordrecht: Foris.

— (2000). Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Crespo, E., L. Conti y H. Maquieira (2003). Sintaxis del griego clásico. Madrid: Gredos. Cristofaro, S. (2003). Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Delbecque, N. (1987). Problèmes et methods de l’étude de la variation syntaxique: la

position des sujets en espagnol. Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Lovaina. Den Dikken, M. (2009). Comparative correlatives and successive cyclicity. En A. Lipták

(ed.), Correlatives cross-linguistically, 263-306. Ámsterdam; Filadelfia: John Benjamins.

Diessel, H. (2001). The ordering distribution of main and subordinate clauses: a typological study. Language, 77, 433-455.

— (2005). Competing motivations for the ordering of main and adverbial clauses. Linguistics, 43: 3, 449-470.

Dik, S. (1968). Coordination. Its implications for the theory of general linguistics, ed. 1987. Ámsterdam: North-Holland.

Dixon, R. M. W. (1977). A grammar of Yidiny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. — (1994). Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. — (1995). Complement clauses and complementation strategies. En F. R. Palmer (ed.),

Grammar and meaning: essays in honour of Sir John Lyons, 175-220. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

— (1997). The rise and fall of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. — (2008). Comparative constructions. A cross-linguistic typology. Studies in Language,

32: 4, 787-817. Donahue, M. (2003). Morphological templates, headedness, and applicatives in Barupu.

Oceanic Linguistics, 42: 1, 112-43. Dryer, M. S. (1983). Indirect objects in Kinyarwanda revisited. En D. M. Perlmutter

(ed.), Studies in Relational Grammar 1, 129-40. Chicago, Londres: The University of Chicago Press.


4

— (1986). Primary objects, secondary objects, and antidative. Language, 62 (4), 808-45.

— (1989). Large linguistic areas and language sampling. Studies in Language, 13 (2), 257-292.

— (1991). SVO languages and the OV:VO typology. Journal of Linguistics, 27, 443-482.

— (1992). The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language, 68, 81-138. — (1998). Why statistical universals are better than absolute universals. Chicago

Linguistic Society, 33: The Panels, 123-145. — (2002). Case distinctions, rich verb agreement, and word order type. Theoretical

Linguistics, 28, 151-157. — (2006). Descriptive theories, explanatory theories, and basic linguistic theory. En F.

Ameka, A. Dench y N. Evans (eds.), Catching language: issues in grammar writing, 207-234. Berlín: Mouton de Gruyter.

— (2007a). Clause types. En T. Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. 1: Clause structure, 224-275. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

— (2007b). Word Order. En T. Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. 1: Clause structure, 61-131. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

— (2009). The branching direction theory revisited. En S. Scalise, E. Magni y A. Bisetto (eds.), Universals of language today, 185-207. Berlín: Springer

— (2013a). Order of subject, object, and verb. En M. Dryer y M. Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Digital Library. Disponible en: http://wals.info/chapter/81 (15-05-2015).

— (2013b). Order of object and verb. En M. Dryer y M. Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Digital Library. Disponible en: http://wals.info/chapter/83 (15-05-2015).

— (2013c). Relationship between the order of object and verb and the order of relative clause and noun. En M. Dryer y M. Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Digital Library. Disponible en: http://wals.info/chapter/96 (15-05-2015).

— (2013d). Relationship between the order of object and verb and the order of adjective and noun. En M. Dryer y M. Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Digital Library. Disponible en: http://wals.info/chapter/97 (15-05-2015).

— (2013e). Order of demonstrative and noun. En M. Dryer y M. Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Digital Library. Disponible en: http://wals.info/chapter/88 (15-05-2015).

— (2013f). Order of numeral and noun. En M. Dryer y M. Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Digital Library. Disponible en: http://wals.info/chapter/89 (15-05-2015).

— (2013g). Order of degree word and adjective. En M. Dryer y M. Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Digital Library. Disponible en: http://wals.info/chapter/91 (15-05-2015).


5

— (2013h). Order of adverbial subordinator and clause. En M. Dryer y M. Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Digital Library. Disponible en: http://wals.info/chapter/94 (15-05-2015).

— (2013i). Position of polar question particles. En M. Dryer y M. Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Digital Library. Disponible en: http://wals.info/chapter/92 (15-05-2015).

— (2013j). Position of interrogative phrases in content questions. En M. Dryer y M. Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Digital Library. Disponible en: http://wals.info/chapter/93 (15-05-2015).

— (2013k). Position of case affixes. En M. Dryer y M. Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Digital Library. Disponible en: http://wals.info/chapter/51 (13-05-2015).

— (2013m). Order of relative clause and noun. En M. Dryer y M. Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Digital Library. Disponible en: http://wals.info/chapter/90 (16-05-2015).

Dryer, M. con O. D. Gensler (2013). Order of object, oblique, and verb. En M. Dryer y M. Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Digital Library. Disponible en: http://wals.info/chapter/51 (15-05-2015).

Du Bois, J. W. (1987). The discourse basis of ergativity. Language, 63: 4, 805-855. Dunn, M. J. (1999). A grammar of Chukchi. Tesis doctoral, Australian National University. Dyła, S. (1988). Quasi-comitative coordination in Polish. Linguistics, 26: 3, 383-414. Evans, N. (2007). Insubordination and its uses. En I. Nikolaeva (ed.), Finiteness: theoretical

and empirical foundations, 366-431. Oxford: OUP. Fernández Lagunilla, M. (1999). Las construcciones de gerundio. En I. Bosque y V.

Demonte (coords.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, vol. 2, 3443-3503. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.

Field, F. (2004). Second language acquisition in Creole genesis. The role of processabil-ity. En G. Escure y A. Schevegler (eds.), Creoles, contact, and language change: linguistics and social implications, 127-60. Filadelfia: John Benjamins.

Foley, W. A. y R. D. Van Valin (1984). Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Frajzyngier, Z. (1989). A grammar of Pero. Berlín: Dietrich Reimer Verlag. Franchini, E. (1986). Las condiciones gramaticales de la coordinación copulativa en

español. Berna: Francke Verlag. Frank, P. (1990). Ika syntax. Dallas: The Summer Institute of Linguistics y University of

Texas at Arlington. García Berrio, A. (1969-1970). Bosquejo para una descripción de la frase compuesta en

español. Anales de la Universidad de Murcia, XXVIII, 3-4, 209-231. Gerdts, D. B. (1988). Object and absolutive in Halkomelem Salish. Nueva York;

Londres: Garland Publishing, Inc. Gerdts, D. B. y K. Kiyosawa (2005). Halkomelem psych applicatives. Studies in

Language, 29: 2, 329-62. Gil, D. (1991). Aristotle goes to Arizona, and finds a language without and. En D.

Zaefferer (ed.), Semantic universals and universal semantics, 96-130. Dordrecht: Fo-ris Publications.


6

— (2008). How complex are isolating languages? En M. Miestamo, K. Sinnemäki y F. Karlsson (eds.), Language complexity. Typology, contact, change, 109-132. Ámster-dam; Filadelfia: John Benjamins.

— (2009). How much grammar does it take to sail a boat? En G. Sampson, D. Gil y P. Trudgill (eds.), Language complexity as an evolving variable, 19-33. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Givón, T. (1993). Voice and de-transitivization. En T. Givón, English grammar: a func-tion-based introduction, vol. II, 45-105. Ámsterdam; Filadelfia: John Benjamins.

— (2001). Syntax: an introduction, vol. I. Ámsterdam; Filadelfia: John Benjamins. — (2002). Note on the grammar of Turkish nominalizations. En J. L. Bybee y M. Noo-

nan (eds.), Sentences in grammar and discourse, 125-144. Ámsterdam; Nueva York: John Benjamins.

Guerrero, L. (2012). La marcación de plural en verbos y sustantivos en lenguas yutoazte-cas. En C. Conti, L. Guerrero y S. Santos (eds.), Aproximaciones a la documentación lingüística del huichol, 119-148. Jáen : Publicaciones de la Universidad de Jaén.

Guerrero, L. y R. D. Van Valin (2004). Yaqui and the analysis of primary object lan-guages. International Journal of American Linguistics, 70: 3, 290-319.

González Calvo, M. (1983). Algunas precisiones sobre el ‘imperativo’ en la oración compuesta. Anuario de Estudios Filológicos, 6, 117-130.

González de la Calle, P. U. (1950). Lo compramos con él. Boletín del Instituto Caro y Cuervo VI, 282-292.

Greenberg, J. H. (1963). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. En J. H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of human language, 73-113. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Grimes, B. (2000). Ethnologue. Languages of the world, vols. I-II. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.

Haiman, J. y S. A. Thompson (1984). Subordination in universal grammar. En C. Brugmann y M. Macauley (eds.), Proceedings of the tenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 510-523. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Harris, A. C. (1981). Georgian syntax: a study in relational grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Haspelmath, M. (1990). The grammaticization of passive morphology. Studies in Language, 14: 1, 25-72.

— (1995). The converb as a cross-linguistically valid category, en M. Haspelmath y E. König (eds.), Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective, 1-55. Berlín; Nueva York: Mouton de Gruyter.

— (1999). External possession in a European areal perspective. En D. L. Payne y I. Barshi (eds.), External possession, 109-135. Ámsterdam; Filadelfia: John Benja-mins.

— (2004). Coordinating constructions: an overview. En M. Haspelmath (ed.), Coordinating constructions, 3-40. Ámsterdam; Filadelfia: John Benjamins.

— (2010). Framework-free grammatical theory. En B. Heine y H. Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammatical analysis, 341-365. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


7

— (2013). On the cross-linguistic distribution of same-subject and different-subject ‘want’ complements: economic vs. iconic motivation, SKY Journal of Linguistics, 26, 41-69.

— (2014). Comparative syntax. En A. Carnie, Y. Sato y D. Siddiqi (eds.), The Routledge handbook of syntax, 490-508. Londres: Routledge.

Hawkins, J. A. (1983). Word order universals. San Diego: Academic Press. — (1992). Innateness and function in language universals. En J. A. Hawkins y M. Gell-

Mann (eds.), The evolution of human languages, 87-120. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Heath, J. (1999). A grammar of Koira Chiini. Berlín; Nueva York: Mouton de Gruyter. Hengeveld, K. (1995). The internal structure of adverbial clauses. En B. Devriendt et al.

(eds.), Complex structures: a functionalist perspective, 119-148. Berlín; Nueva York: Mouton de Gruyter.

— (1998). Adverbial clauses in the languages of Europe. En J. van der Auwera (en colaboración con D. P. Ó. Basill) (ed.), Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe, 335-420. Berlín; Nueva York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Hengeveld, K. y J. L. Mackenzie (2008). Functional Discourse Grammar. A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hernanz, L. (1999). El infinitivo. En I. Bosque y V. Demonte (coords.), Gramática des-criptiva de la lengua española, vol. 2, 2197-2356. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.

Herslund, M. (1986). The double object construction in Danish. En L. Hellan y K. Koch Christensen (eds.), Topics in Scandinavian syntax, 125-47. Dordrecht; Boston; Lancaster; Tokyo: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

— (1997). Passive and antipassive in a functional description of French reflexive verbs. Hermes, Journal of Linguistics, 19, 75-92.

Hetzron, R. (1973). Conjoining and comitativization in Hungarian. A study of rule order-ing. Foundations of Language, 10, 493-507.

Horie, K. (2001). Complement clauses. En M. Haspelmath, E. Köenig, W. Oesterreicher y W. Raible (eds.), Handbook of language typology and language universals, 979-993. Berlín: Walter de Gruyter.

Jiménez Juliá, T. (1995). La coordinación en español. Problemas teóricos y descriptivos, Anejo 39 de Verba. Santiago de Compostela: Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.

Jones, W. y P. Jones (1991). Barasano syntax. Dallas: The Summer Institute of Linguistics y University of Texas at Arlington.

Juvonen, P. (2008). Complexity and simplicity in minimal lexica: the lexicon of Chinook jargon, 321-340. En M. Miestamo, K. Sinnemäki y F. Karlsson (eds.), Language complexity: typology, contact, change. Ámsterdam: John Benjamins.

Keenan, E. L. (1985). Passive in the world’s languages. En T. Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 1, 243-81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Keenan, E. L. y B. Comrie (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistics, 8, 63-99.


8

Keenan, E. L. y M. Dryer (2007). Passive in the world’s languages. En T. Shopen (ed.), Clause structure. Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 1, 325-361. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kemmer, S. (1993). The middle voice. Ámsterdam: John Benjamins. Kenesei, I., R. M. Vago y A. Fenyvesi (1997). Hungarian. Londres; Nueva York:

Routledge. Kimenyi, A. (1980). A Relational grammar of Kinyarwanda. Berkeley: University of

California Press. König, E. y M. Haspelmath (1997). Les constructions à possesseur externe dans les

langues de l’Europe. En J. Feuillet (ed.), Actance et valence dans les langues de l’Europe, 525-606. Berlín: Mouton de Gruyter.

Kulikov, L. I. (1993). The ‘second causative’. A typological sketch. En B. Comrie y M. Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and transitivity, 121-154. Ámsterdam; Filadelfia: John Benjamins.

Kyota, K. B. y P. Swiggers (1988). Concomitance-mediated plurals and grammatical person hierarchy in Yaka. Folia Linguistica, Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europeae, 2/3: 4, 387-395.

Langacker, R. W. (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. II. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form. Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

— (2000). When subjects behave like objects: An analysis of the merging of S and O in sentence-focus constructions across languages. Studies in Language, 24: 3, 611-682.

LaPolla, W. A. (2010). Clause linkage and nexus in Papuan languages. En I. Bril (ed.), Clause linking and clause hierarchy: syntax and pragmatics, 27-50. Ámsterdam: John Benjamins.

Lehmann, W. P. (1973). A structural principle of language and its implications. Language, 49, 47-66.

— (1978). The great underlying ground-plans. En W. P. Lehmann (ed.), Syntactic typology: studies in the phenomenology of language, 3-49. Austin: University of Texas Press.

— (1986). On the typology of relative clauses. Linguistics, 24, 663-680. Versión revisada disponible en: http://www.christianlehmann.eu (07-10-2013).

— (1988). Towards a typology of clause linkage. En J. Haiman y S. A. Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse, 181-226. Ámsterdam; Filadelfia: John Benjamins.

Lipták, A. (2009). The landscape of correlations: an emprirical and analytical survey. En A. Lipták (ed.), Correlatives cross-linguistically, 1-48. Ámsterdam; Filadelfia: John Benjamins.

Macaulay, M. (1996). A grammar of Chalcatongo Mixtec. Berkeley; Los Ángeles; Londres: University of California Press.

Madugu, I. S. G. (1982). The Yoruba nì-object construction in pragmatic perspective. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics, 4, 43-58.


9

Matthiessen, C. y S. A. Thompson (1988). The structure of discourse and subordination. En J. Haiman y S. A. Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse, 275-330. Ámsterdam; Filadelfia: John Benjamins.

Marcos Marín, F. (1980). Curso de gramática española. Madrid: Cincel. Maurer, P. (1998). El papiamento de Curazao. En M. Perl y A. Schwegler (eds.),

América negra: panorámica actual de los estudios lingüísticos sobre las variedades hispánicas, portuguesas y criollas, 139-217. Frankfurt am Main, Vervuert; Madrid: Iberoamericana.

Mauri, C. (2008). Coordination relations in the languages of Europe and beyond. Berlín; Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.

McNally, L. (1993). Comitative coordination: a case study in group formation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 11, 347-379.

Mejías, E. (1999). Unaccusative and antipassive constructions. En J. Franco, A. Landa y J. Martín (eds.), Grammatical analyses in Basque and Romance linguistics. Papers in honor of Mario Saltarelli, 165-177. Ámsterdam: John Benjamins.

Meyer-Hermann, R. (1990). Sobre algunas condiciones pragmaticas del sujeto en español. Estudios de Lingüística de la Universidad de Alicante, 6, 73-88.

Mithun, M. (1991). Active/agentive case marking and its motivations. Language, 67: 3, 510-546.

— (2000). Polysynthesis in the Arctic. En M. A. Mahieu y N. Tersis (eds.), Variations on polysynthesis: the Eskaleut languages, 3-18. Ámsterdam; Filadelfia: John Benja-mins.

Mora, A. (2006). La transitividad en construcciones oracionales constituidas por un verbo matriz y un objeto oracional subordinado introducido por que. Tesis doctoral, El Colegio de México.

Morales de Walters, A. (1982). La posición de sujeto en el español de Puerto Rico a la luz de la clase semántica verbal, la oposición tema-rema y el tópico oracional. Lingüística Española Actual, IV, 23-38.

Moravcsik, E. A. (1978). On the distribution of ergative and accusative patterns. Lingua,

45, 233-279. Moreno Cabrera, J. C. (1987). Fundamentos de sintaxis general. Madrid: Síntesis. — (1997). Introducción a la lingüística: enfoque tipológico y universalista. Madrid:

Síntesis. — (1998). Agente y paciente por activa y por pasiva. En J. de Dios Luque Durán y A.

Pamies Bertrán (eds.), Estudios de tipología lingüística, 79-106. Granada: Granada Lingvistica.

— (2000). Curso universitario de lingüística general, vols. 1-2, 2.ª ed. corregida y au-mentada. Madrid: Síntesis.

— (2003). El universo de las lenguas. Clasificación, denominación, situación, ti-pología, historia y bibliografía de las lenguas. Madrid: Castalia.

Moreno de Alba, J. G. (1979). Coordinación y subordinación en gramática española. Anuario de Letras, XVII, 5-58.


10

Morphy, F. (1983). Djapu, a Yolngu dialect. En R. M. W. Dixon y B. J. Blake (eds.), Handbook of Australian languages, vol. 3, 1-187. Canberra: The Australian National University Press.

Mühlhäusler, P. (1997). Pidgin and Creole linguistics, ed. revisada y aumentada. Lon-dres: University of Westminster Press.

Nedjalkov, I. (1997). Evenki. Londres; Nueva York: Routledge. — (1998). Converbs. En J. van der Auwera (en colaboración con D. P. Ó. Basill) (ed.),

Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe, 421-455. Berlín; Nueva York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Newman, P. (2000). The Hausa language. An encyclopedic reference grammar. New Haven; Londres: Yale University Press.

Newmeyer, F. J. (1990). Speaker-hearer asymmetry as a factor in language evolution: a functional explanation for formal principles of grammar. En K. Hall, J. P. Koenig, M. Meacham, S. Reinman, L. A. Sutton (eds.), Proceedings of the sixteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 241-247. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.

Nichols, J. (1986). Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language, 62: 1, 56-119.

— (1992). Linguistic diversity in space and time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Nichols, J. y B. Bickel (2013a). Locus of marking in the clause. En M. Dryer y M.

Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Disponible en: http://wals.info/chapter/23 (12-05-2015).

— (2013b). Locus of marking: whole-language typology. En M. Dryer y M. Haspel-math (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck In-stitute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Disponible en: http://wals.info/chapter/23 (12-05-2015).

Nieuwenhuijsen, D. (2006). Cambios en la colocación de los pronombres átonos. En C. Company Company (dir.), Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española. Primera parte: La frase verbal, vol. 2, 1337-1404. Ciudad de México: Universidad Nacional Autó-noma de México/Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Noonan, M. (2007). Complementation. En T. Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syn-tactic description, Vol. II: Complex constructions, 2.ª ed., 52-150. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.

O’Herin, B. (2001). Abaza applicatives. Language, 77: 3, 477-93. Overall, S. (2009). Aguaruna. En R. M. W. Dixon y A. Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), The seman-

tics of clause linking, 167-192. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pandharipande, R. y Y. Kachru (1977). Relational grammar, ergativity and Hindi-Urdu.

Lingua, 41, 217–238. Palmer, F. R. (1986). Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Payne, J. R. (1985). Complex phrases and complex sentences. En T. Shopen (ed.), Lan-

guage typology and syntactic description. Vol. II: Complex constructions, 3-40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Payne, T. (2000). Toward a substantive typology of applicative constructions. Manuscri-to, Universidad de Oregón.


11

Perlmutter, D. M. y P. M. Postal (1983). Toward a universal characterization of passivi-zation. En D. M. Perlmutter (ed.), Studies in relational grammar, vol. 1, 3-29. Chi-cago: Chicago University Press.

Peterson, D. A. (1999). Discourse-functional, historical, and typological aspects of ap-plicative constructions. Tesis doctoral, University of California, Berkeley.

Polinsky, M. (2013a). Antipassive constructions. En M. Dryer y M. Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Disponible en: http://wals.info/chapter/102 (14-05-2015).

— (2013b). Applicative constructions. En M. Dryer y M. Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Disponible en: http://wals.info/chapter/102 (14-05-2015).

Pottier, B. (1988). ¿Es el español una lengua SVO? Nueva Revista de Filología Hispáni-ca, XXXVI, 3-7.

Purwo, B. K. (1997). The direct object in bi-transitive clauses in Indonesian. En T. Givón (ed.), Grammatical relations. A functionalist perspective, 233-52. Ámster-dam; Filadelfia: John Benjamins.

Ramos, T. V. (1971). Tagalog for beginners. Honolulú: University of Hawaii Press. Ridruejo, E. (1999). Modo y modalidad. El modo en las subordinadas sustantivas. En I.

Bosque y V. Demonte (coords.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, vol. 2, 3209-3252. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.

Rigau, G. (1990). The semantic nature of some Romance prepositions. En J. Mascaró y N. Nespor (eds.), Grammar in progress, 363-373. Dordrecht: Foris.

Rijkhoff, J. y D. Bakker (1998). Language sampling. Linguistic Typology, 2-3, 263-314. Rojo, G. (1978). Cláusulas y oraciones, Anejo 14 de Verba. Santiago de Compostela:

Universidad de Santiago de Compostela. Ross, J. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax. Tesis doctoral, MIT. Ross, M. (1978). A Waskia grammar sketch and vocabulary. Canberra: The Australian

National University. Ruhlen, M. (1987). A guide to the world’s languages. Volumen 1: Classification. Stan-

ford: Stanford University Press. Salazar, V. (2000). El afijo aplicativo -i- del suahelí y sus repercusiones teóricas para la

gramática funcional. Estudios de Lingüística de la Universidad de Alicante, 14, 217-43.

Schmidt, R. L. (2007). Urdu: an essential grammar. Londres: Routledge. Sebba, M. (1987). The syntax of serial verbs. An investigation into serialisation in Sra-

nan and other languages. Ámsterdam: John Benjamins. Shibatani, M. (1985). Passives and related constructions: A prototype analysis. Langua-

ge, 61: 4, 821-49. Siewierska, A. (1984). The passive: a comparative linguistic analysis. New Hampshire:

Croom Helm. — (2013a). Verbal person marking. En M. Dryer y M. Haspelmath (eds.), The World

Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Disponible en: http://wals.info/chapter/102 (12-05-2015).


12

— (2013b). Passive constructions. En M. Dryer y M. Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Disponible en: http://wals.info/chapter/107 (12-05-2015).

Siewierska, A. y D. Bakker (1996). The distribution of subject and object agreement and word order type. Studies in Language, 20, 115-161.

Silverstein, M. (1976). Hierarchy of features and ergativity. En M. R. W. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages, 112-171. Canberra: Australian In-stitute of Aboriginal Studies y Nueva Jersey: Humanities Press.

Song, J. J. (1996). Causatives and causation: a universal-typological perspective. Lon-dres; Nueva York: Addison Wesley Longman.

Southern Ute Tribe (1980). Ute reference grammar. Ignacio, Colorado: The Southern Ute Press.

Stassen, L. (1985). Comparison and universal grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. — (2000). AND-languages and WITH-languages. Linguistic Typology, 4: 1, 1-54. Stolz, T., S. Kettler, C. Stroh y A. Urdze (2008). Split possession. An areal-linguistic

study of the alienability correlation and related phenomena in the languages of Eu-rope. Ámsterdam; Filadelfia: John Benjamins.

Strońsky, K. (2009). Variation of ergativity patterns in Indo-Aryan. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 45: 3, 237-253.

Taylor, C. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. En T. Shopen (ed.). Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 57-138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Thompson, S., R. E. Longacre y S. J. J. Hwang (2007). Adverbial clauses. En T. Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. II: Complex Constructions, 2.ª ed., 237-299. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Toivonen, I. (1995). A study of Finnish infinitives. Tesis doctoral, Brandeis University. Tokunaga, S. (2001). Clases aspectuales de verbos y restricciones aspectuales de la for-

mación pasiva en japonés. Tesis doctoral, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Tucker, A. N. (1967). The Eastern Sudanic languages, vol. 1. Londres: International Af-

rican Institute. Valenzuela, P. M. (2010). Ergativity in Shipibo-Konibo, a Panoan language of the Uca-

yali. En S. Gildea y F. Queixalós (eds.), Ergativity in Amazonia, 65-96. Ámsterdam: John Benjamins.

Van Gijn, R., K. Haude y P. Muysken (2011). Subordination in South America: an over-view. En R. Van Gijn, K. Haude y P. Muysken (eds.), Subordination in native South American languages, 1-24. Ámsterdam; Filadelfia: John Benjamins.

Van Valin, R. D. (1980). On the distribution of passive and antipassive constructions in universal grammar. Lingua, 50: 4, 303-332.

— (1984). A typology of syntactic relations in clause linkage. Proceedings of the tenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 542-558. Disponible en: http://elanguage.net/journals/index.php/bls/article/view/2380/2342 (29-01-2012).

— (2005). Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

— (2007). The role and reference grammar analysis of three-place predicates. Disponi-ble en: http://wings.buffalo.edu/linguistics/rrg (13-05-2015).


13

Van Valin, R. D. y LaPolla R. J. (1997). Syntax. Structure, meaning and function. Cam-bridge: Cambridge University Press.

Vennemann, T. (1974). Theoretical word order studies: results and problems. Papiere zur Linguistik, 7, 5-25.

Verstraete, J. C., S. D’Hertefelt y A. Van linden (2012). A typology of complement in-subordination in Dutch. Studies in Language, 36: 1, 123-153.

Watters, D. E. (2009). Kham. En R. W. Dixon y Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), The semantics of clause linking, 96-117. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wierzbicka, A. (1980). The case for surface case. Ann Arbor: Karoma Publishers. Yamamoto, M. (1999). Animacy and reference: a cognitive approach to corpus linguis-

tics. Ámsterdam; Filadelfia: John Benjamins. Zúñiga, F. (2006). Deixis and alignement. Inverse systems in indigenous languages of

the Americas. Ámsterdam; Filadelfia: John Benjamins.

Documents

10 Fundamentos de sintaxis tipológica Bibliografía web WEB Fundamentos... · Inflectional morphology. En T. Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 169240. Cambridge: