Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
10-11-23: SAPAP Review Application: Judge Ralph Zulman Ruling: Radical Honesty v. City Press
Citation preview
DECISSION : SECOND APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL DATED 8 November 2010
To: L Johnstone
Email:[email protected]
And via fax number :086 561 9566:
And copy to
[email protected] and [email protected]
1. I have carefully considered your above application for leave to appeal as also the correspondence that has passed between the Deputy Press Ombudsman (Mr Retief) as well as his decision.
2. I am satisfied that the Deputy Press Ombudsman has properly applied his mind to the matter.
3. I draw your attention to paragraph 3.1 of the Constitution of the Press Council of South Africa read with paragraph 2.6 of Annexure A thereto. The relevant portion of paragraph 2.6 reads as follows:
“ lf the Chairperson of the South African Press Council Appeals Panel [SAPAP] is of the view that the SAPAP may come to a decision different to that of the Ombudsman ...he or she grants leave to appeal.”
4. I regret to inform you that I am of the view that there is no reasonable prospect that the SAPAP may come to a decision different to that of the Deputy Press Ombudsman.
5. Accordingly leave to appeal is refused.
Judge RH Zulman
E MAIL: [email protected]
Chairman SA Press Appeals Panel
24 November 2010
