7910Consultant’s Performance Evaluation

Page 1

Evaluation Date: Date Score Total:(add Questions 1 through 10)

Total

Percentage of Phase: 50% 100% Contract Type: Choose an item.

Consultant Name: Name

Consultant Address: Address

Project No.: Project Number Construction Cost: $ Cost

Project Name And Location:

Location

Evaluator:    (Name) (Signature) (Date)

ADPM or Department Head if Agency Administered:

(Name)   (Signature) (Date)

Reviewed By Chief Architect:

(N/A if Agency Administered) (Name)   (Signature) (Date)

All Questions Must Be Answered:

1.0 Were the Shop Drawings reviewed, researched, and processed in a timely manner?Comments: Click here to enter text. Superior ☐ 10

Satisfactory ☐ 7

Unsatisfactory ☐ 0

Sub Total: Sub

2.0 Did the Consultant provide Competent Site Observation including timely and accurate Field Reports?Comments: Click here to enter text. Superior ☐ 10

Satisfactory ☐ 7Unsatisfactory ☐ 0

Sub Total: Sub

3.0 Were the Consultant and Design Team responses to field questions dealt with in an acceptable manner that did not negatively impact the project Schedule?

Comments: Click here to enter text. Superior ☐ 10

Satisfactory ☐ 7Unsatisfactory ☐ 0

Sub Total: Sub

4.0 Did the Consultant and Design Team work with the Contractor to resolve issues?Comments: Click here to enter text. Superior ☐ 10

Satisfactory ☐ 7Unsatisfactory ☐ 0

Sub Total: Sub

All Questions Must Be Answered:

CT DAS – 7910 (Rev: 03.12.19) 7000 – Construction Phase Forms

7910Consultant’s Performance Evaluation

Page 2

5.0 Were the Change Orders, Requests For Information, and Pay Requisitions processed in a timely manner?Comments: Click here to enter text. Superior ☐ 10

Satisfactory ☐ 7Unsatisfactory ☐ 0

Sub Total: Sub

6.0 Was the Final Change Order Amount acceptable?Comments: Click here to enter text. Superior ☐ 10

Satisfactory ☐ 7Unsatisfactory ☐ 0

Sub Total: Sub

7.0 Did the Design Team work in a professional manner with the Agency and all Agency Department personnel?

Comments: Click here to enter text. Superior ☐ 10

Satisfactory ☐ 7Unsatisfactory ☐ 0

Sub Total: Sub

8.0 Did the Consultant and Design Team attend Project Meetings, and were they productive at the Meetings?Comments: Click here to enter text. Superior ☐ 10

Satisfactory ☐ 7Unsatisfactory ☐ 0

Sub Total: Sub

9.0 Did the Consultant provide the required Close Out Documents to the Contractor in a timely manner?Comments: Click here to enter text. Superior ☐ 10

Satisfactory ☐ 7Unsatisfactory ☐ 0

Sub Total: Sub

10.0 Based on the overall construction experience, should the State consider this Consultant and Design Team again for another Project of similar size, scope, and dollar value?

Comments: Click here to enter text. Superior ☐ 10

Satisfactory ☐ 7Unsatisfactory ☐ 0

Sub Total: Sub

Copies: Process Mgmt Project Support Services ADPM Chief Arch. File PG7

PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN TO CT DAS PROJECT MANAGER

Reviewed By Consultant:

Name Date(Name)   (Signature) (Date)

End

CT DAS – 7910 (Rev: 03.12.19) 7000 – Construction Phase Forms