Upload
dortha-higgins
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Using concept map approaches to communicate and present knowledge
University of Oulu, FinlandEDTECH A41857 (1 credit) – Challenges,
Problems, & Future of EdTech
Wednesday March 30, 2005
Dr. Roy ClarianaPenn State University
email: [email protected]: www.personal.psu.edu/rbc4
"First we build the tools, then they build us!" -- Marshall McLuhan
2
goals
Your take aways:• Some experiences with collaborative concept
mapping, mindmapping
• Some understanding of how/why it works
• Some examples that you could implement on Monday morning in your classroom or in you research
Your Digital Portfolio for future reference and for sharing
3
1 credit option
Digital portfolio – Formulate as a group a digital portfolio of mindmapping, which you may utilize in the future in your studies or work. • For teachers, provide specific examples for
using mind mapping in your classroom
• For researchers, provide specific examples for using mind mapping in your research
4
2 credit option?
Digital Portfolio plus a White paper – a 5-10 page (double-spaced)
persuasive review of some aspect of mind mapping, i.e., scripting MM in CSCL, MM as an artifact, etc. [Based on your intuition, describe how a MM can work, this is your first iteration of a “solution”. The White papers is a “soft sell” for your “solution” that describes the problem (90% of the document) and then states clearly how your solution solves the problem (10%). Avoid straw man arguments.]
5
If you are interested…
Manuscript for presentation – I hope that we can publish this experience, i.e., based on several projects we will do, together we formulate questions, collect and analyze data, write… (this will likely go beyond the workshop time frame and is also more open-ended)
For example:How does interaction develop/evolve in online collaborative mind mapping?What scripts can support online collaborative mind mapping?
6
Agenda for today
Welcome and introductions all around Q&A Brief overview of concept maps Intro to Cmap tools software Brainstorm activity (group roles) Set up Project 1 (see handout) Set up Project 2 (see handout) Does anyone have any student essays that we
can use in Project 3 on Monday?Click here for projects handout
7
some terminology Concept map – diagrams indicating interrelationships
among concepts and representing conceptual frameworks within a specific domain of knowledge (vanBoxtel)
Concept map – a visual set of nodes and arcs (a network representation) that embodies the relationships among the set of concepts. Also called knowledge maps, mindmaps, semantic maps (Turns, et al.).
Nodes – terms/complexes/concepts (usually nouns, things, examples, ideas, categories, people, locations…)
Links (arcs) – lines connecting nodes, usually labeled with a relationship term (usually verbs)
Propositions – node-link-node combinations, also called “soup” (ketti) by IHMC
Turns, Atman, & Adams, 2000
Vygotsky
contrast
Some foundation stuff
8
Mindmaps vs. concept maps
Bahr (2004) using concept maps to teach English to German students
9
Mindmap of “group” knowledge (Anni, Anna, Paula, Esa, ja Herkko), source is
the second floor hallway
muistahuumori !
konkretisoi !
opettajanoma tarina
elävöittää
kytkeoppilaanarkeen !
liikuta oppilas ylös penkistä
kikkoja
istumajärjestys !
huiputa !
perustele !
haasta,kysele !
yllätä !
oppettajanvaikutus- mahdollisuudet
pelkkäkalvoshow
samatyötapa
liian pitkään
vältä ! työtavat
vaihto kyllin usein
demot,konkreettisetesimerkit
tekeminen vs. pelkkäkuunteleminen
nopeat
oppilaiden erot
lisätehtäviä
hitaat
tukiopetus. apu
huomaaerot
luokkakohtaiseterot
ikäluokkavaikuttaa
näennäinenkeskittyminen ?
hiljainenluokka
vilkas luokka
erityisenpaljonkikkoja
eipalautettaopettajalle
10
Mindmaps vs. concept maps
My question is, do concept maps or do mindmaps fit better with the Finnish language?
11
Tools to support mapping
Yellow stickies!! Pencil and paper may be best for your classroom
Software – PowerPoint is pretty good Inspiration is good but expensive CMAP tool is free, but your tech person
will have to agree to support it At least 22 other tools are available,
some free some not
12
Other concept map automatic scoring approaches
CMap tools (IHMC) that we will use today C-TOOLS – Luckie (PI), University of Michigan NSF
grant available: http://ctools.msu.edu/ctools/index.html TPL-KATS – University of Central Florida (e.g., Hoeft,
Jentsch, Harper, Evans, Bowers, & Salas, 1990). TPL-KATS: concept map: a computerized knowledge assessment tool. Computers in Human Behavior, 19 (6), 653-657.
SEMNET – http://www.semanticresearch.com/about/ CMAT – Arneson & Lagowski, University of Texas,
http://chemed.cm.utexas.edu Plus 22 other non-scoring map tools, Inspiration,
Kidspiration
13
Some previous uses of mapping
Usually involve individuals working alone, and involve text in some way
Some collaborative strategies have been used
Lets look at a few…
14
Using a student mindmap to “capture” a text (note taking)
Textbook
Text text text text text text text text text text text
text
texttext
Mindmap notes
student
text
memo
Examples?
15
Using a student mindmap to “capture” research on a topic
textText text
text text tex Text text text text
textttext
texttext
Mindmap notes
student
text
memo
textText text
text text tex Text text text text
textt
www
video
Examples?
video
16
Then using the mindmap to write an essay
essay
Text text text text text text text text text text text
text
texttext
Mindmap notes
student
text
memo
Examples?
17
Using a researcher drawn mindmap to “capture” an interview transcript
Interview 1
Text text text text text text text text text text text
text
texttext
The capability and experience of the person coding the text is critical…
Interview 1
coder
text
memo
attributetheory noteissue
18
Using a group drawn mindmap to “capture” an interview
text
texttext
text
The capability and experience of the person coding the text is critical…
Interview 1
interviewer
Qs
19
Example of dyad collaboration (not online)
text
texttext
text
text
texttext
text
Yergin
Mindmap artefact Verbal discussion (taped)
Analyze the discussion
Blah blah blah blah Blah blah
Hannah
Blah blah blah blah Blah blah
Observations:On taskAbstract talk3-propositions/minQuestionAnswerCriticizeConflictElaborationCo-construction
van Boxtel, van der Linden, Roelofs, & Erkens (2002)
Problem: Sometimes unscientific notions are ingrained
Inferred:Active use of prior knowledgeAcknowledged problemsLook for meaningful relationsNegotiation
Shared objects play an important role in negotiation and co-construction
The incredible value of talk!
Note the attentional effects of the artifact
20
Chiu et al. example of an online collaboration
p.22, Chiu, Huang, & Chang (2000)
text
texttext
text
text
texttext
text
Hannah(lead)
Jari
Yergin
H: WE should …J: Did you see…Y: Yeah, but …Etc.Etc.
Mindmap artefact
Online chat
Analyzed the chat textAnd the mindmap
creates
Mindmap session lasted 80 minutes. 3 x 12 online groups, communicate by chat, 745 messages were exchanged (avg. of 62 per group).
Only the lead could alter the mindmap
The ‘other 2 members used chat to “advise”
Researchers
21
Project 1 and 2 We will experiment with two online collaboration
approaches Project 1 is a synchronous concept map
collaboration using Cmap tools software Project 2 is an asynchronous concept map
collaboration using PowerPoint software and email But next, we will try brainstorming with Cmap tools to
become familiar with the tools and process before setting up Project 1
Click here for projects handout
22
First Mind map CSCL roles… Starter: You work as a discussion moderator. Your assignment is to engage your
group members to the discussion by asking questions and commenting. And if the wrapper makes small summaries during discussion you can utilize his or her work to raise new questions. Active participation in the discussions is essential.
Wrapper: Your assignment is to sum up the discussion. If you think it is easier you can summarize frequently and weave ideas together. For example, if five participants of your group are having a discussion about collaborative and co-operative learning you can summarize their main points during the discussion. An alternative way is to sum up the discussions in the end of article-videoclip task (and the last course assignment). Please overview your group's discussions and make a brief summary of the main topics. Active participation in the discussions is essential.
Group member: Your assignment is to participate actively into discussions by asking questions making comments and stating arguments. You are expected to be a critical inquirer.
Evaluator (an optional role): You are required to evaluate your group's work during the course. Please focus on the group interaction and group dynamics, for example how the starters, wrappers and group members performed during the discussions and last course assignment. The tutors inform you when to perform evaluations. Notice that you are also a deputy starter and a deputy wrapper if the originally named persons are not available. If you are called to work as a starter or wrapper please see the instructions given above. The role of evaluators are used only if you have not had a role of starter or wrapper during this course.
Mindmap activity…
23
Cluster analysis
Brainstorming(corpus list)
Sorting(move like terms closer)
Merging & Pruning(combine like terms,
delete or move unlike terms,synthesize terms)
enter
Naming Clusters(name the categories/themes)
Sorting Clusters(move like clusters closer)
Naming broad themes(name the cluster of clusters)
and if necessary
E-document (to save/print)
Build consensus!
24
Brainstorm, then make the map
Open IHMC Cmap tools Fill in personal information on first use (I’ll tell
you what to type in here) Click Other Places Open brainstorm file Click collaborate icon
if necessary Type in your first name Collaborate
25
Now go back andadd Small Group RolesGroup Task RolesInitiator-contributor. Proposes new ideas or approaches to group problem solving; may
suggest a different approach to procedure or organizing the problem-solving taskInformation seeker. Asks for clarification of suggestions; also asks for facts or other
information that may help the group deal with the issues at handOpinion seeker. Asks for clarification of the values and opinions expressed by other
group membersInformation giver. Provides facts, examples, statistics, and other evidence that pertains
to the problem the group is attempting to solveOpinion giver. Offers beliefs or opinions about the ideas under discussionElaborator. Provides examples based on his or her experience or the experience of
others that help to show how an idea or suggestion would work if the group accepted a particular course of action
Coordinator. Tries to clarify and note relationships among the ideas and suggestions that have been provided by others
Etc..
Mindmap activity…
26
Project 1 – Cmap tools synchronous collaboration
(see the Project handout)
Set day and time to join online …….
27
Project 1
IHMC Public Cmaps conv v2 on Jan 22 2004
28
Oulu EDTECH Public
Project 1
29
Project 2 – Overview of “Pass the soup”
Email to
Email to
Email to
Email to
PowerPoint file
(see the Project handout)
30
Project 2 – “Pass the soup” PowerPoint file
Slide 1 – mindmap is developed bit-by-bit here by the group by adding only 3 to 5 elements and then emailing it to the next person on the list
Slide 2 – numbered list of names of group members with email address, other instructions
Slide 3, 4, etc. – comments about changes that you want to make, suggestions, etc.
1. Bob – [email protected]. Mary – [email protected]. Tiina – [email protected]. Etc.
Instructions: Add 3 or 4components, pass to thenext person…
B: I decided to add blah and blah because I am interested in artifacts
M: I deleted Bob’s blah because it is stupid, and then added blah
T: I linked blah and blahetc…
31
How to use ALA-Reader
Monday, April 4, 2005
32
Agenda for today Debrief “pass the soup” activity, and come up
with a better Finnish name for it Q&A Brief overview of my concept map
assessment research ALA-Reader demo (English language
essays) Set up Project 3 for Finnish (see handout) How can we find Finnish essays for use in
Project 3?
33
Final map for Project 2: Team 1Why don’t we read from computer screens concept map?
Poor screen resolution (96 dpi)
paper more portable
paper has weight,texture, and feel
easy to underline andwrite notes on paper
familiarity
with paper,easier to multi-task
several paper pagessimultanosly viewed and
comparedworking options/possiblities
and requirements
appearance
easier to makegood-looking
slides and copiesabout drafts with
computer
paper has better contrast
comp screen is smaller than paper
computer to store, paper to read
computers require
computers require constant updatesmanual dexterity
of child and adultfeelings/perceptions
computer to communicate, paper
to study
computers skills
Computer screens
Group: Tanja, Henna & Roy
Click her toSee progression
Of this map
34
Final map for Project 2: Team 2
Why don’t we read text fromcomputers?
screensize
Paper /Hard copy
e-book
resolution
luminosity
able to write notes
possibility to store
underline
own commentsreliable
archive
paper easy toread for eyes
doesn’t need any hardware
never seen one
easy to use etext feelsephemeral
book feelscomfortable
can make papercopies my own
connections
technical problems
differentversions
reliable but heavy to travel with
electronic documents
light to carry/ travel
personalpreference
amount of text
1 page or less
screen
2-10pages
print topaper
copyright
e-text easy to copy/paste
eyes gets mixed up
ergonomy
multimedia
decision toprint
headache
shoulder problems
Group: Maria, Paivi & Roy
Click her toSee progression
of this map
35
Debriefing
What happened? What worked? What did not work? What would you do differently next time?
If you like, write this up as a team for your final paper.
36
My research interests
Mind map assessment – automatic scoring software tool called ALA-Mapper http://www.personal.psu.edu/rbc4/ala.htm
Essay assessment – automatic scoring software tool called ALA-Reader http://www.personal.psu.edu/rbc4/score.htm
for Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) see: http://www.personal.psu.edu/rbc4/frame.htm
prototypes
37
Novak
Novak says “Concept maps were first developed in our research program in 1972 as a way to represent changes in children’s understanding of science concepts over the 12-year span of schooling. We were using modified Piagetian clinical interviews to assess changes in their knowledge over time, but we found the interview transcripts were too difficult to analyze for changes in specific aspects of the children’s knowledge. Instead we prepared concept maps from the interviews.”
From: http://wwwcsi.unian.it/educa/mappeconc/jdn_an2.html
38
First uses… to represent knowledge in a visual format
lungs
oxygenateblood
removeCO2
pulmonaryartery
pulmonaryvein
leftatrium
rightventricle
lungs
oxygenateblood
removeCO2
pulmonaryartery
pulmonaryvein
leftatrium
rightventricle
The primary parts of the system are the heart, blood cells, and vessels. The human heart, a pump, is made of cardiac muscle Cardiac muscles have a unique feature of forming connections between two adjacent cardiac cells. This allows the muscle cells to contract powerfully and quickly involuntarilyThe brain is unable to increase or decrease the heart's beating The heart is comprised of four chambers; two upper chambers called atriums, and two lower chambers called ventriclesThe blood flows through the right side to the lungs where it picks up oxygen. The blood then returns to the right. Next, it flows into the left where it I xxxx
tissue within the body by approximately 9 pints of blood through 100,000 miles of vesselsThe primary parts of the system are the heart, blood cells, and vessels. The human heart, a pump, is made of cardiac muscle Cardiac muscles have a unique feature of forming connections between two adjacent cardiac cells. This allows the muscle cells to contract powerfully and quickly involuntarilyThe brain is unable to increase or decrease the heart's beating The heart is comprised of four chambers; two upper chambers called atriums, and two lower chambers called ventriclesThe blood flows through the right side to the lungs where it picks up oxygen. The blood then returns to the right. Next, it flows into the left where it I xxxx
The human circulatory system is a transportation system. Nutrients and oxygen are carried to living tissue within the body by approximately 9 pints of blood through 100,000 miles of vesselsThe primary parts of the system are the heart, blood cells, and vessels. The human heart, a pump, is made of cardiac muscle Cardiac muscles have a unique feature of forming connections between two adjacent cardiac cells. This allows the muscle cells to contract powerfully and quickly involuntarilyThe brain is unable to increase or decrease the heart's beating The heart is comprised of four chambers; two upper chambers called atriums, and two lower chambers called ventriclesThe blood flows through the right side to the lungs where it picks up oxygen. The blood then returns to the right. Next, it flows into the left where it I xxxx
Novak interview dataWas science content knowledge
Mind Map
39
Finnish research withconcept maps… Mainly for knowledge representation for instructional use but also for
representing the structure of a curriculum and for group communication Pasi Eronen, Jussi Nuutinenn and Erkki Sutinen, (http://
www.cs.joensuu.fi/pages/avt/concept.htm), Joensuu (computer science) Mauri Ählberg, Helsinki (education) and Erkki Rautama (computer science) University of Art and Design, Helsinki (
http://www2.uiah.fi/~araike/papers/articles/CinemaSense_Collaborative_Cinemastudies_DeafWay2002.htm) (see also: Future Learning Environment 3)
Text graphs (Helsinki): http://www.cs.hut.fi/Research/TextGraph/ Kari Lehtonen, Helsinki Polytechnic, concept maps as a portfolio component
(http://cs.stadia.fi/~lehtonen/DPF/dpf-berlin-02-muotoiltu.doc) Also School astronomy and Vocational Training and Education 4th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies
Joensuu, Finland, August 30 - September 1, 2004
40
Concept map for assessment: score validity???
Concept maps contains propositions
These propositions scores are generally considered to be valid and reliable measures of science content knowledge organization (Ruiz-Primo, Schultz, Li, Shavelson, CREST in California. . .).
essaysinterviews
tests
lungsoxygenate
blood
CO2artery
pulmonary
atriumventricle
veinlungs
oxygenate
blood
CO2artery
pulmonary
atriumventricle
vein
lungs
oxygenateblood
removeCO2
pulmonaryvein
leftatrium
lungs
oxygenateblood
removeCO2
pulmonaryvein
leftatrium
observations
41
e.g.,…
Rye and Rubba (2002) reported that traditional concept map scores were related to California Achievement total test scores (r = 0.73). (Note that Crocker and Algina say that validation coefficients rarely exceed r=0.50.)
Concept maps (cognitive maps, concept maps) may be an appropriate approach for assessing structural knowledge (Jonassen, Beissner, & Yacci, 1993).
For example, concept maps have been used to visualize the change from novice to expert.
42
Scoring Concept Maps
Traditionally, concept maps are scored by teachers or trained raters using scoring rubrics (e.g., Lomask’s rubric)
Although this marking approach is time consuming and fairly subjective, map scores usually correlate well with more traditional measures of science content knowledge (multiple choice, fill-in-the blank, and essays)
Complex scoring rubrics decrease the concept map score reliability (so keep scoring simple)
43
Scoring Concept Maps
C3 describes our automatic system for scoringconcept maps:
collect –>convert –> compare
1. Collect raw map data2. Convert raw data into a mathematical network
representation3. Compare the mathematical network
representation of two maps (e.g., student to teacher, student to expert, student to student)
44
1. Collect raw data
What raw data can a computer “extract” from a concept map?
Term counts – in open-ended maps, count required terms included
Propositions – a link connecting two terms and a link label
Associations – geometric distance between pairs of terms. Small values indicate stronger relationship.
45
Link and distance data
Distance Array
Link Array
lungs
oxygenated deoxygenated
pulmonary artery
pulmonary vein
left atrium
right ventricle
a b c d e f ga left atrium - b lungs 0 - c oxygenate 0 1 - d pulmonary artery 0 1 0 - e pulmonary vein 1 1 0 0 - f deoxgenate 0 1 0 0 0 - g right ventricle 0 0 0 1 0 0 -
a b c d e f ga left atrium - b lungs 120 - c oxygenate 150 36 - d pulmonary artery 108 84 120 - e pulmonary vein 73 102 114 138 - f deoxgenate 156 42 54 84 144 - g right ventricle 66 102 138 42 114 120 -
moves through
to the
passes into
to the
Most approaches use only link label information, usually called “propositions”.
(n2-n)/2 pair-wise comparisons
46
Link and distance
Link data (propositions) – are the common way to compare/assess concept maps
Distance data – not common, based on James Deese’s (1965) ideas on the structure of association in language and thought, card-sorting task approaches (Vygotsky in Luria, 1979, Miller, 1969), Kintsch and Landauer’s ideas on representing text structure, and neural network methods (Elman, e.g., 1995)
47
Using our Finnish Mind Map example
Borrowed from Anni, Anna, Paula, Esa, ja Herkko
Found in the hallway on the second floor
See next slide
48
muistahuumori !
konkretisoi !
opettajanoma tarina
elävöittää
kytkeoppilaanarkeen !
liikuta oppilas ylös penkistä
kikkoja
istumajärjestys !
huiputa !
perustele !
haasta,kysele !
yllätä !
oppettajanvaikutus- mahdollisuudet
pelkkäkalvoshow
samatyötapa
liian pitkään
vältä ! työtavat
vaihto kyllin usein
demot,konkreettisetesimerkit
tekeminen vs. pelkkäkuunteleminen
nopeat
oppilaiden erot
lisätehtäviä
hitaat
tukiopetus. apu
huomaaerot
luokkakohtaiseterot
ikäluokkavaikuttaa
näennäinenkeskittyminen ?
hiljainenluokka
vilkas luokka
erityisenpaljonkikkoja
eipalautettaopettajalle
49
Collect Mind Map raw data
hilja
inen
luok
ka
huom
aa e
rot
kikk
oja
luok
kako
htai
set e
rot
oppe
ttaja
n va
ikut
us-m
ahdo
llisu
udet
oppi
laid
en e
rot
työt
avat
vilk
as lu
okka
vältä
Link arrayhiljainen luokka -- huomaa erot 0 -- kikkoja 0 0 -- luokkakohtaiset erot 1 1 0 -- oppettajan vaikutus-mahdollisuudet 0 1 1 0 -- oppilaiden erot 0 1 0 0 0 -- työtavat 0 0 0 0 1 0 -- vilkas luokka 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 -- vältä 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 --
Distance arrayhiljainen luokka -- huomaa erot 127 -- kikkoja 245 199 -- luokkakohtaiset erot 79 52 225 -- oppettajan vaikutus-mahdollisuudet 214 122 100 164 -- oppilaiden erot 161 91 290 93 205 -- työtavat 234 111 175 164 76 166 -- vilkas luokka 73 117 288 68 232 105 227 -- vältä 302 207 114 252 88 282 122 320 --
9 main terms selected here (ALA-Mapper max=30)
50
Selecting terms
Selecting important terms (and their synonyms) is a critical step (for example, singular value decomposition in LSA derives terms). We use an expert(s) to determine terms.
Goldsmith, Johnson, and Acton (1991)
51
predictive validity of PFNets directly relates to the number of terms used
0,00
0,10
0,20
0,30
0,40
0,50
0,60
0,70
0,80
0 10 20 30
pred
ictiv
e va
lidity
Number of terms
Goldsmith, Johnson, and Acton (1991)
So, perhaps the predictive validity of Concept Maps (and essays) directly relates to the number of terms used
52
2. Convert raw data into scores
Currently, we use a data reduction and comparison approach called Pathfinder network representation (PFNet, Schanveldt, 1990). Our future research will consider additional approaches, such as MDS and data-mining. http://interlinkinc.net/Pathfinder.html
PFNets describe the least weighted path to connect the terms
Scores are established by comparing the participant’s PFNet to a referent (expert) PFNet, and calculating the number of common links (the intersection)
Visual example
53
Finnish example: PFNet for distance data
kikkoja
oppettajan vaikutusmahdollisuudet
työtavat
oppilaiden erot
huomaa erot
luokkakohtaiset erot
hiljainen luokka
vilkas luokka
vältä
PFNet for distance data
54
Compare student to expert referent
kikkoja
oppettajan vaikutusmahdollisuudet
työtavat
oppilaiden erot
huomaa erot
luokkakohtaiset erot
hiljainen luokka
vilkas luokka
vältä
Expert Referent PFNet
kikkoja
oppettajan vaikutusmahdollisuudet
työtavat
oppilaiden erot
huomaa erot
luokkakohtaiset erot
hiljainen luokka
vilkas luokka
vältä
Student PFNet
O
O6 of 8 common links
55
Poindexter and Clariana
Participants – 23 undergraduate students in intro EdPsyc course (Penn State Erie)
Food rewards for participation Setup – complete a demographic survey
and how to make a concept map lesson Text based lesson interventions –
instructional text on the “heart” with either proposition specific or relational lesson approach
Poindexter, M. T., & Clariana, R. B. (in press). The influence of relational and proposition-specific processing on structural knowledge and traditional learning outcomes. International Journal of Instructional Media, 33 (2), in press. link to doc file
#1st
56
Treatments Relational condition, participants were required to
“unscramble” sentences (following Einstein, McDaniel, Bowers, & Stevens, 1984) in one paragraph in each of the five sections or about 20% of the total text content
Proposition-specific condition (following Hamilton, 1985), participants answered three or four adjunct constructed response questions (taken nearly verbatim from the text) provided at the end of each of the five sections, for a total of 17 questions covering about 20% of the total text content (no feedback was provided).
57
Posttests
Concept map (use 26 terms provided)• Link-based common scores
• Distance-based common scores
Multiple-choice tests (Dwyer, 1976)• Identification (20)
• Terminology (20)
• Comprehension (20)
58
Means and sd
Treatments Posttests ID TERM COMP Map-prop Map-assoc control 15.1 12.3 7.3 14.1 9.0
(4.4) (4.6) (5.4) (4.6) (3.6)
proposition- 16.3 14.6 13.8 16.5 11.5 specific
(5.6) (5.7) (3.7) (8.3) (3.4)
relational 17.0 12.7 12.4 13.9 10.7 (2.6) (3.5) (3.0) (9.4) (4.6)
Map-link Map-dist
59
Analysis
MANOVA (relational, proposition-specific, and control) and five dependent variables including ID, TERM, COMP, Map-prop, and Map-assoc.
COMP was significance, F = 5.25, MSe = 17.836, p = 0.015, none of the other dependent variables were significance.
Follow-up Scheffé tests revealed that the proposition-specific group’s COMP mean was significantly greater than the control group’s COMP mean (see previous Table).
60
Correlations
ID TERM COMP Prop ID -- TERM 0.71 -- COMP 0.50 0.74 -- Map-prop 0.56 0.77 0.53 -- Map-assoc 0.45 0.69 0.71 0.73 All sig. at p<.05
Compare to Taricani & Clariana
next
Map-link
Map-linkMap-distance
61
Taricani and Clariana – Replication of Poindexter and Clariana
Taricani, E. M. & Clariana, R. B. (in press). A technique for automatically scoring open-ended concept maps. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53 (4), in press.
TermComp
Link data 0.78 0.54
Distance data 0.48 0.61
62
Compare these two . . .
Poindexter & Clariana TermComp
Link data 0.77 0.53
Distance data 0.69 0.71
Taricani & Clariana TermComp
Link data 0.78 0.54
Distance data 0.48 0.61
63
Clariana, Koul, & Salehi
Participants – A group of 24 practicing teachers enrolled in CI 400
Lesson intervention – while researching online, completed concept maps in pairs (newsprint & yellow stickies) to describe the structure and function of the heart and then individually wrote essays on this topic from their maps.
Clariana, R. B., Koul, R., & Salehi, R. (in press). The criterion related validity of a computer-based approach for scoring concept maps. International Journal of Instructional Media, 33 (3), in press.
# 2nd
64
Posttests
Essays Multiple-raters using holistic rubric Computer-derived LSA Essay scores
(http://www.personal.psu.edu/rbc4/frame.htm)
Concept Maps Multiple-raters using Lomask’s rubric ALA-Mapper PFNet link and distance
agreement with an expert
65
Correlation matrix
Map Essay LSA LinkMap 1 Essay 0.49 1 LSA 0.31 0.73 1 Link data 0.36 0.76 0.83 1 Distance data 0.60 0.77 0.71 0.82 1
p < .05 shown in boldface type.
Human Computer
Many investigators have noted the close relationship between maps and essays.
66
Overview: Tools to score Essays
ETS – PEG (Project Essay Grade), e-rater, Criterion and other products… http://www.ets.org/research/erater.html
Walter Kintsch (and Landau) at CU-Boulder – Latent semantic analysis, many uses, i.e., score online training for the Army - http://lsa.colorado.edu/
Vantage Learning essay scoring products - http://www.vantagelearning.com/
ALA-Reader: http://www.personal.psu.edu/rbc4/score.htm
67
ALA-Reader
… an electrical signal starts the heartbeat, by causing the atrium to contract. The blood then flows through the pulmonary valve into the pulmonary artery and then into the lungs. Once inside the lungs, the blood gives up the carbon dioxide (cleansed) and receives oxygen. This oxygenated blood …
atrium
contract
lungs
cleansed oxygenated
P artery
P valve
Text PFNet
Link array
68
Clariana & Koul
Participants – Again, a group of 24 practicing teachers enrolled in CI 400
Lesson – while researching the topic “the structure and function of the heart” online, students completed concept maps using Inspiration software and later wrote an essay on this topic from their maps.
Clariana, R.B., & Koul, R. (2004). A computer-based approach for translating text into concept map-like representations. In A.J.Canas, J.D.Novak, and F.M.Gonzales, Eds., Concept maps: theory, methodology, technology, vol. 2, in the Proceedings of the First International Conference on Concept Mapping, Pamplona, Spain, Sep 14-17, pp.131-134. http://cmc.ihmc.us/papers/cmc2004-045.pdf
# 3rd
69
Posttests
Essays Multiple-raters using holistic rubric Computer-derived LSA Essay scores
(http://www.personal.psu.edu/rbc4/frame.htm)
Concept Maps Multiple-raters using Lomask’s rubric ALA-Mapper PFNet link and distance agreement
with an expert ALA-Reader PFNet link scores (from 1 to 5)
(so far, only looked at essay scores)
70
ALA-Rater PFNet scores
The scores for each text and rater-pair are shown ordered from best to worst.
ALA-Reader scores were moderately related to the combined text score, Pearson r = 0.69, and ranked 5th overall.
71
Comments and Questions
??
72
Demo ALA-Reader
Download ALA-Reader.exe Create terms file (can include 2 synonyms) Create 2 expert baseline reference texts called
expert1.txt and expert2.txt (i.e., Instructor, best student)
Use it (type in the students essay file name) Files created
• Summary file called report.txt
• Multiple *.prx files (PRX folder)
Available at: www.personal.psu.edu/rbc4
73
Other methods for eliciting and representing knowledge structure
Monday, April 11, 2005
74
agenda
Today is a hands-on demonstration day Brief overview of the ideas SPSS for representing Pathfinder KU-Mapper
My intent, you will know enough to begin to use these approaches
75
Eliciting structural knowledge
Every method for eliciting knowledge should be viewed as “sampling”
Caution, never forget the likely effects of contiguity (time, space, etc.) dominating over semantics (meaning)
essaysinterviews
tests
lungsoxygenate
blood
CO2artery
pulmonary
atriumventricle
veinlungs
oxygenate
blood
CO2artery
pulmonary
atriumventricle
vein
lungs
oxygenateblood
removeCO2
pulmonaryvein
leftatrium
lungs
oxygenateblood
removeCO2
pulmonaryvein
leftatrium
observations
76
Dave’s ideas
Knowledgerepresentation
Knowledgecomparison
Knowledgeelicitation
Jonassen, Beissner, & Yacci (1993), page 22
77
Dave’s ideas
graphbuilding
similarityratings
semanticproximity
wordassociations
cardsort
orderedrecall
freerecall
additivetrees
hierarchicalclustering
orderedtrees minimum
spanningtrees
linkweighted
Pathfindernets
NetworksDimensional
principalcomponents
MDS – multidimensional scaling
clusteranalysis
expert/novice
qualitativegraph
comparisons
quantitativegraph
comparisons
relatednesscoefficients
scalingsolutions
C of PFNets
Trees
Knowledgerepresentation
Knowledgecomparison
Knowledgeelicitation
Jonassen, Beissner, & Yacci (1993), page 22
78
Eliciting structural knowledge
Vygotsky (in Luria, 1979); Miller (1969) card-sorting approaches
Deese’s (1965) ideas on the structure of association in language and thought
Kintsch and Landauer’s ideas on representing text structure, and latent semantic analysis
Recent neural network representations (e.g., Elman, 1995)
79
Analyzing Deese free association data with MDS
Hands-on with MDS in SPSS• A good description of MDS:
http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/stmulsca.html
• (Aside: a good description of Factor analysis: http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/stfacan.html )
Hands-on with Pathfinder KNOT
80
Deese, free recall data (p.56)
mot
h
inse
ct
win
g
bird
fly yello
w
flow
er
bug
coco
on
colo
r
blue
bees
sum
mer
suns
hine
gard
en
sky
natu
re
sprin
g
butt
erfly
moth 100 12 12 12 11 1 0 4 11 0 0 2 2 5 1 1 1 1 15insect 12 100 9 9 17 1 1 33 10 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 12wing 12 9 100 44 19 0 0 3 2 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 3 0 13bird 12 9 44 100 21 1 0 3 2 1 1 10 0 1 0 1 5 0 12fly 11 17 19 21 100 1 1 8 6 1 2 6 0 3 0 2 4 0 11yellow 1 1 0 1 1 100 7 0 0 17 23 2 2 7 5 2 4 3 5flower 0 1 0 0 1 7 100 2 0 3 7 2 1 6 18 2 6 2 6bug 4 33 3 3 8 0 2 100 7 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0 4cocoon 11 10 2 2 6 0 0 7 100 0 0 4 1 1 1 0 2 0 22color 0 1 0 1 1 17 3 0 0 100 32 0 0 2 0 8 0 0 0blue 0 1 0 1 2 23 7 0 0 32 100 1 2 4 4 46 3 2 2bees 2 3 10 10 6 2 2 5 4 0 1 100 1 2 3 0 4 2 7summer 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 100 5 2 0 1 10 0sunshine 5 0 0 1 3 7 6 0 1 2 4 2 5 100 2 3 2 15 4garden 1 0 0 0 0 5 18 0 1 0 4 3 2 2 100 0 4 4 2sky 1 0 0 1 2 2 2 0 0 8 46 0 0 3 0 100 0 1 0nature 1 1 3 5 4 4 6 2 2 0 3 4 1 2 4 0 100 2 3spring 1 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 2 2 10 15 4 1 2 100 2butterfly 15 12 13 12 11 5 6 4 22 0 2 7 0 4 2 0 3 2 100
Deese, J. (1965). The structure of associations in language and thought. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins Press, page 56
Full array (n * n): 19 x 19 = 361Half array ((n2 – n)/2): ((19 x 19) –19 )/2 = 171
100 participants are shown a list of related words, one at a time, and asked to free recall a related term
81
Deese, free recall data (p.56)m
oth
inse
ct
win
g
bird
fly yello
w
flow
er
bug
coco
on
colo
r
blue
bees
sum
mer
suns
hine
gard
en
sky
natu
re
sprin
g
butt
erfly
moth 100 12 12 12 11 1 0 4 11 0 0 2 2 5 1 1 1 1 15insect 12 100 9 9 17 1 1 33 10 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 12wing 12 9 100 44 19 0 0 3 2 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 3 0 13bird 12 9 44 100 21 1 0 3 2 1 1 10 0 1 0 1 5 0 12fly 11 17 19 21 100 1 1 8 6 1 2 6 0 3 0 2 4 0 11yellow 1 1 0 1 1 100 7 0 0 17 23 2 2 7 5 2 4 3 5flower 0 1 0 0 1 7 100 2 0 3 7 2 1 6 18 2 6 2 6bug 4 33 3 3 8 0 2 100 7 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0 4cocoon 11 10 2 2 6 0 0 7 100 0 0 4 1 1 1 0 2 0 22color 0 1 0 1 1 17 3 0 0 100 32 0 0 2 0 8 0 0 0blue 0 1 0 1 2 23 7 0 0 32 100 1 2 4 4 46 3 2 2bees 2 3 10 10 6 2 2 5 4 0 1 100 1 2 3 0 4 2 7summer 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 100 5 2 0 1 10 0sunshine 5 0 0 1 3 7 6 0 1 2 4 2 5 100 2 3 2 15 4garden 1 0 0 0 0 5 18 0 1 0 4 3 2 2 100 0 4 4 2sky 1 0 0 1 2 2 2 0 0 8 46 0 0 3 0 100 0 1 0nature 1 1 3 5 4 4 6 2 2 0 3 4 1 2 4 0 100 2 3spring 1 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 2 2 10 15 4 1 2 100 2butterfly 15 12 13 12 11 5 6 4 22 0 2 7 0 4 2 0 3 2 100
Deese, J. (1965). The structure of associations in language and thought. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins Press, page 56
Full array (n * n): 19 x 19 = 361Half array ((n2 – n)/2): ((19 x 19) –19 )/2 = 171
82
Using MDS in SPSS
Start SPSS and open the deese.sav file Under Analyze, select Scale, then select
Multidimensional Scaling (ALSCAL)… Move Variable from left to right Create distances from data Model Options Next page
83
Select all of these
84
-2 -1 0 1
Dimension 1
-1,5
-1,0
-0,5
0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
Dim
ensi
on
2
moth
insect
wing
birdflyyellow
flower
bug
cocoon
colorblue
bees
summer
sunshinegarden
sky
nature
spring
butterfl
Euclidean distance model
Derived Stimulus Configuration
Multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) of Deese data
85
Both are “correct”.
Side issue, the MDS obtains alternate (e.g., enantiomorphic) visual representations
Oulu
PoriTampere
Helsinki
Jyväsklyä
Oulu
PoriTampere
Helsinki
Jyväsklyä
Is this map correct?
geographic data, for example, may be oriented in different ways
86
How good is the representation?
many dimensions (as many as 19) reduced to 2 dimensions
Check the “stress” value to estimate how strained the results are
-2 -1 0 1
Dimension 1
-1,5
-1,0
-0,5
0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
Dim
ensi
on
2
moth
insect
wing
birdflyyellow
flower
bug
cocoon
colorblue
bees
summer
sunshinegarden
sky
nature
spring
butterfl
Euclidean distance model
Derived Stimulus Configuration
An algorithmic, power, approach rather than based on a model so no assumptions about data structure are required…
87
Side trip Wordnet: http://wordnet.princeton.edu/
http://wordnet.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/webwn
What is the Visual Thesaurus? – The Visual Thesaurus offers stunning visual displays of the English language. Looking up a word creates an interactive visual map with your word in the center of the display, connected to related words and meanings.
Type “bird” in at: http://www.visualthesaurus.com/trialover.jsp
88
Pathfinder Network (PFNet) analysis Pathfinder is a mathematical approach for representing
and comparing networks, see: http://interlinkinc.net/index.html
Pathfinder data reduction is based on the least weighted path between nodes (terms), so for example, Deese’s 171 data points become 18 data points. Only the salient or important data is retained.
Pathfinder PFNet uses, for example:• Library reference analysis
• Measuring Team Knowledge (Nancy J. Cooke) next slide
• Use google to see many more
89
Pathfinder for cognitive task analysis
Shope, DeJoode, Cooke, and Pedersen (2004)
90
PFNet of same data
Now let’s try Pathfinder analysis of the
same Deese data set… Find the pfnet folder Double-click to run PCKNOT.bat (notice
the bat extension, see next slide below) We will do it together
91
Select the right PCKNOT file
92
PFNet of Deese datasummer
springsunshine
yellowcolor
blue
sky
flower
garden
nature
butterfly
cocoon moth
wing
beesbird
fly
bug
insect
93
MDS and PFNet of Deese data
summer
springsunshine
yellowcolor
blue
sky
flower
garden
nature
butterfly
cocoon moth
wing
beesbird
fly
bug
insect
summer
springsunshine
yellowcolor
blue
sky
flower
garden
nature
butterfly
cocoon moth
wing
beesbird
fly
bug
insect
-2 -1 0 1
Dimension 1
-1,5
-1,0
-0,5
0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
Dim
ensi
on
2
moth
insect
wing
birdflyyellow
flower
bug
cocoon
colorblue
bees
summer
sunshinegarden
sky
nature
spring
butterfl
Euclidean distance model
Derived Stimulus Configuration
Pathfinder KNOT PFNet SPSS MDS
94
MDS and PFNet data reduction
MDS uses all of the data points to reduce the dimensions in the representation, and so may be improperly driven by noise in the data or by unimportant data points
Pathfinder uses only the most important data
95
Transition to your real life example
Finally, you will collect *real* data (using my KU-Mapper software) and
analyze it with Pathfinder KNOT
96
KU-Mapper
Your data, determine 15 important terms in your research area (Finnish and English), create a “terms.txt” file with the 15 terms
Run KU-Mapper (do all 3 tasks: pair-wise, list-wise, and card sort)
Use KNOT to analyze and compare all three prx files
Download KU-Mapper from: http://www.personal.psu.edu/rbc4/KUmapper.htm
97
Debrief your data activity
What happened? What worked? What did not work? What would you do differently next time?
If you like as your final paper, describe how you might use this approach.
98
Final thoughts…
I enjoyed working with you If you want a credit,
• Email to let me know this
• Then be sure to send me you paper via email as soon as possible
99
Stop here
100
Possible research question on optimal scripts: Under- vs. over-scripting CSCL
Amount of scripting
Am
ount
of
colla
bora
tion
linear S-curve
with crash?
J-curve
Amount of scripting Amount of scripting
Some possibilities
101
generative learning strategies
Generative learning (Jonassen, 1988) recall - repetition, rehearsal, review, mnemonics integration - learner paraphrases, generates
questions, generates examples organization - learner analyzes key ideas by creating
headings, underlining keywords, outlining, categorizing (i.e., invent table categories, populate a table with existing ideas)
elaboration - generate mental images, create physical diagrams, sentence elaboration (i.e., invent stuff to fill cells in a table)+ +
+
102
I just "think" systemically and "n-dimensionally" on paper, with imagery…
My essential skill is simply--If you can explain it to me, I can draw a picture of it. It doesn't matter if it's something totally new to me, if you can make a coherent explanation, and let me understand it. I can "visualize it" and make a picture that shows you what you said.
This is why I work in aerospace. I'm able to sit down with SME's (Subject Matter Experts-in any discipline), let them do a "data-dump" and put a sketch in their hand at the end of the conversation that "say's it all". This skill is vital to helping disparate technical types talk to each other (communication across cultural barrier of the "dialect" of the various technical disciplines). It also provides a way for ideas to get from that rough-semi coherent stage and into a practical and "do-able" condition.
For example, One day I found myself working a Kelly Temp job for a bunch of Boeing System
Analysts doing a JAD (joint application development) project to design a computing architecture for a new tooling system for the 777. The first drawing came by accident, started a huge argument, and eventually (2 weeks later) resolved in a group wide "a-hah"... that put everyone on the same wavelength-allowing the new system to be built a lot more "right" than usual, quicker than usual.
From: http://visual.wiki.taoriver.net/moin.cgi/MichaelErickson