Upload
reynard-matthews
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
This Powerpoint presentation is for the sole use of Northern Arizona University personnel in their self-study work
John Taylor Staff Liaison
2
Greetings to Northern Arizona University
from
3
The Higher Learning Commission
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
4
Basic Facts about Accreditation
Accreditation is a voluntary process of self evaluation and peer
evaluation that has two fundamental purposes quality assurance and quality improvement
The two types of voluntary accreditation are institutional accreditation [whole institution] specialized accreditation [specific program]
5
19 States
1003plusmn Institutions
The Higher Learning Commission Region
6
The Higher Learning Commission of NCA - Founded 1895
The Organization Member Institutions - copy1003 Location of Member Institutions - in 19 States
Decision-Making Processes and Peer Reviewers Corps Board of Trustees - 15-21 Members Institutional Actions Council - 26 Members Accreditation Review Council - 170 Members Peer Reviewer Corps -copy 1200 Reviewers
Full-time Staff Executive Director - 1 Directors [Including Asst amp Assoc) - 12 Other Full-time Staff - 21plusmn
7
Diversity of Mission among the Membership of Institutions [1003]
Two-year Institutions Four-year Bachelorrsquos Institutions Four-year Liberal Arts Institutions Comprehensive Institutions Tribal Colleges Faith Based Institutions Research Universities Single Purpose Institutions Public Private NFP and For Profit
8
Mission of The Higher Learning Commission of NCA
ldquoServing the common good by assuring and advancing the quality of higher learningrdquo
9
ldquoSpecial Connectionsrdquo
Professor Joseacute Colchado (Education) Director Bruce Fox (Honors Program) President John Haeger Vice President Fred Hurst (Extended Programs
and Dean of Distance Learning)
10
Mission of Northern Arizona University
ldquoProvide an outstanding undergraduate residential education strengthened by important research graduate and professional programs and a responsive distance learning network delivering programs throughout Arizonardquo
11
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Values
Excellence in Education Student Success Educational Access Diversity Integrity Civility
12
Northern Arizona Universityrsquo ldquoGoalsrdquo
Provide Undergraduate Education Excellence in a Residential Learning Community
Strengthen graduate education economic development and research
Increase Enrollment and Retention Provide Leadership in the Development
Use and Assessment of Technologies in Administrative Systems and Educational Programs
13
Northern Arizona Universityrsquo ldquoGoalsrdquo
Foster a Culture of Diversity Community and Citizenship
Become the Nationrsquos Leading University Serving Native Americans
Ensure Financial Stability and Growth
14
Todayrsquos Agenda Focus Accreditation and Other Matters The Higher Learning Commissionrsquos
Expectations Regarding Self-Study Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Interests
Prospective Character of the Self-Study and Review Institutional Capacity Strategies for Engaging the Campus Community
15
Prospective Character of the Self-Study and Review
Institutional Self-Study and Self-Reflection
Institutionrsquos Mission Values and Goals
Evaluation of the Whole Organization
Engage Multiple Constituencies
Build on Institutional Processes
Effective Leadership and Communication
Evidence of Fulfilling the Criteria for Accreditation
Production of a Self-Study Report
Use of Self-Study Findings to Inform Decision-making and Future Institutional Development
Hallmarks of an Effective Self-Study Process
16
Fundamental Shifts
Inputs
Teaching
Focus on Past
Autonomy
Outcomes
Learning
Focus on Future
Connectedness
17
Topical Areas of the Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
18
Two Evaluation Processes for Continued Accreditation
Institutional Self-Study
Peer Review Decision-making
Processes Continued
Accreditation --Ten-year Cycle
Self-Assessment Strategy Forum Action Projects Annual Updates Systems Appraisal Continued Accreditation
--Seven-Year Cycle
19
Criterion Structure
Criterion Statement
Core Components
Examplesof Evidence
20
1 - Mission amp Integrity1 - Mission amp Integrity
The organization operates with integrity to ensure the fulfillment of its mission
through structures and processes that involve the board administration faculty
staff and students
21
1 - Mission and Integrity
[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Articulation of the Mission2 Recognition of Diversity among Learners other Constituencies and Greater Society 3 Organizational Understanding of Mission4 Mission Supported through Organizational Structures5 Organizational Protection of the Mission Examples of Evidence
22
2 - Preparing for the Future2 - Preparing for the Future
The organizationrsquos allocation of resources and its processes for evaluation and
planning demonstrate its capacity to fulfill its mission improve the quality of its
education and respond to future challenges and opportunities
23
2 - Preparing for the Future[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Realistic Preparation for a Future Shaped by Societal and Economic Trends2 Resource Support for Maintaining and Strengthening Educational Programs3 Evaluation and Assessment Processes Show Effectiveness and Continuous Improvement4 Planning Levels Align with Mission and Capacity to Fulfill the Mission Examples of Evidence
24
3 - Student Learning and3 - Student Learning andEffective TeachingEffective Teaching
The organization provides evidence of student learning and teaching
effectiveness that demonstrates it is fulfilling its educational mission
25
3 - Student Learning and Effective Teaching[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Statements of Student Learning Outcomes That Make Effective Assessment Possible2 Organization Values and Supports Effective Teaching3 Organization Creates Effective Learning Environments4 Learning Resources Support Student Learning And Effective Teaching Examples of Evidence
26
4 - Acquisition Discovery amp4 - Acquisition Discovery ampApplication of KnowledgeApplication of Knowledge
The organization promotes a life of learning for its faculty administration
staff and students by fostering and supporting inquiry creativity practice and
social responsibility in ways consistent with its mission
27
4 - Acquisition Discovery andApplication of Knowledge
[Paraphrased]
1 Organization Demonstrates It Values a Life of Learning
2 Organization Demonstrates the Integral Nature of Knowledge and Skill Acquisition and Intellectual Inquiry3 Organization Assesses the Usefulness of Curricula to
Students Living and Working in a Global Diverse and Technological Society
4 Organization Support Responsible Acquisition Discovery and Application of Knowledge
Examples of Evidence
28
5 - Engagement and Service5 - Engagement and Service
As called for by its mission the organization identifies its constituencies
and serves them in ways both value
29
5 - Engagement and Service[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Organization Learns from Constituencies and Analyzes its Capacity to Serve Them2 Organizational Capacity and Commitment to Engage with Identified Constituencies and Communities3 Organization Demonstrates Responsiveness to Constituencies that Depend on It4 Internal and External Constituencies Value the Organizationrsquos Services Examples of Evidence
30
Cross-cutting Themes
Future-oriented
Learning-focused
Connected
Distinctive
31
Position Statements
Assessment of Student Learning
Diversity
General Education
32
Aligning an Institutionrsquos Mission and Outcomes with the Commissionrsquos
Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
33
The Decennial Cycle of Review
10-Year Window
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
2
Greetings to Northern Arizona University
from
3
The Higher Learning Commission
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
4
Basic Facts about Accreditation
Accreditation is a voluntary process of self evaluation and peer
evaluation that has two fundamental purposes quality assurance and quality improvement
The two types of voluntary accreditation are institutional accreditation [whole institution] specialized accreditation [specific program]
5
19 States
1003plusmn Institutions
The Higher Learning Commission Region
6
The Higher Learning Commission of NCA - Founded 1895
The Organization Member Institutions - copy1003 Location of Member Institutions - in 19 States
Decision-Making Processes and Peer Reviewers Corps Board of Trustees - 15-21 Members Institutional Actions Council - 26 Members Accreditation Review Council - 170 Members Peer Reviewer Corps -copy 1200 Reviewers
Full-time Staff Executive Director - 1 Directors [Including Asst amp Assoc) - 12 Other Full-time Staff - 21plusmn
7
Diversity of Mission among the Membership of Institutions [1003]
Two-year Institutions Four-year Bachelorrsquos Institutions Four-year Liberal Arts Institutions Comprehensive Institutions Tribal Colleges Faith Based Institutions Research Universities Single Purpose Institutions Public Private NFP and For Profit
8
Mission of The Higher Learning Commission of NCA
ldquoServing the common good by assuring and advancing the quality of higher learningrdquo
9
ldquoSpecial Connectionsrdquo
Professor Joseacute Colchado (Education) Director Bruce Fox (Honors Program) President John Haeger Vice President Fred Hurst (Extended Programs
and Dean of Distance Learning)
10
Mission of Northern Arizona University
ldquoProvide an outstanding undergraduate residential education strengthened by important research graduate and professional programs and a responsive distance learning network delivering programs throughout Arizonardquo
11
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Values
Excellence in Education Student Success Educational Access Diversity Integrity Civility
12
Northern Arizona Universityrsquo ldquoGoalsrdquo
Provide Undergraduate Education Excellence in a Residential Learning Community
Strengthen graduate education economic development and research
Increase Enrollment and Retention Provide Leadership in the Development
Use and Assessment of Technologies in Administrative Systems and Educational Programs
13
Northern Arizona Universityrsquo ldquoGoalsrdquo
Foster a Culture of Diversity Community and Citizenship
Become the Nationrsquos Leading University Serving Native Americans
Ensure Financial Stability and Growth
14
Todayrsquos Agenda Focus Accreditation and Other Matters The Higher Learning Commissionrsquos
Expectations Regarding Self-Study Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Interests
Prospective Character of the Self-Study and Review Institutional Capacity Strategies for Engaging the Campus Community
15
Prospective Character of the Self-Study and Review
Institutional Self-Study and Self-Reflection
Institutionrsquos Mission Values and Goals
Evaluation of the Whole Organization
Engage Multiple Constituencies
Build on Institutional Processes
Effective Leadership and Communication
Evidence of Fulfilling the Criteria for Accreditation
Production of a Self-Study Report
Use of Self-Study Findings to Inform Decision-making and Future Institutional Development
Hallmarks of an Effective Self-Study Process
16
Fundamental Shifts
Inputs
Teaching
Focus on Past
Autonomy
Outcomes
Learning
Focus on Future
Connectedness
17
Topical Areas of the Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
18
Two Evaluation Processes for Continued Accreditation
Institutional Self-Study
Peer Review Decision-making
Processes Continued
Accreditation --Ten-year Cycle
Self-Assessment Strategy Forum Action Projects Annual Updates Systems Appraisal Continued Accreditation
--Seven-Year Cycle
19
Criterion Structure
Criterion Statement
Core Components
Examplesof Evidence
20
1 - Mission amp Integrity1 - Mission amp Integrity
The organization operates with integrity to ensure the fulfillment of its mission
through structures and processes that involve the board administration faculty
staff and students
21
1 - Mission and Integrity
[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Articulation of the Mission2 Recognition of Diversity among Learners other Constituencies and Greater Society 3 Organizational Understanding of Mission4 Mission Supported through Organizational Structures5 Organizational Protection of the Mission Examples of Evidence
22
2 - Preparing for the Future2 - Preparing for the Future
The organizationrsquos allocation of resources and its processes for evaluation and
planning demonstrate its capacity to fulfill its mission improve the quality of its
education and respond to future challenges and opportunities
23
2 - Preparing for the Future[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Realistic Preparation for a Future Shaped by Societal and Economic Trends2 Resource Support for Maintaining and Strengthening Educational Programs3 Evaluation and Assessment Processes Show Effectiveness and Continuous Improvement4 Planning Levels Align with Mission and Capacity to Fulfill the Mission Examples of Evidence
24
3 - Student Learning and3 - Student Learning andEffective TeachingEffective Teaching
The organization provides evidence of student learning and teaching
effectiveness that demonstrates it is fulfilling its educational mission
25
3 - Student Learning and Effective Teaching[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Statements of Student Learning Outcomes That Make Effective Assessment Possible2 Organization Values and Supports Effective Teaching3 Organization Creates Effective Learning Environments4 Learning Resources Support Student Learning And Effective Teaching Examples of Evidence
26
4 - Acquisition Discovery amp4 - Acquisition Discovery ampApplication of KnowledgeApplication of Knowledge
The organization promotes a life of learning for its faculty administration
staff and students by fostering and supporting inquiry creativity practice and
social responsibility in ways consistent with its mission
27
4 - Acquisition Discovery andApplication of Knowledge
[Paraphrased]
1 Organization Demonstrates It Values a Life of Learning
2 Organization Demonstrates the Integral Nature of Knowledge and Skill Acquisition and Intellectual Inquiry3 Organization Assesses the Usefulness of Curricula to
Students Living and Working in a Global Diverse and Technological Society
4 Organization Support Responsible Acquisition Discovery and Application of Knowledge
Examples of Evidence
28
5 - Engagement and Service5 - Engagement and Service
As called for by its mission the organization identifies its constituencies
and serves them in ways both value
29
5 - Engagement and Service[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Organization Learns from Constituencies and Analyzes its Capacity to Serve Them2 Organizational Capacity and Commitment to Engage with Identified Constituencies and Communities3 Organization Demonstrates Responsiveness to Constituencies that Depend on It4 Internal and External Constituencies Value the Organizationrsquos Services Examples of Evidence
30
Cross-cutting Themes
Future-oriented
Learning-focused
Connected
Distinctive
31
Position Statements
Assessment of Student Learning
Diversity
General Education
32
Aligning an Institutionrsquos Mission and Outcomes with the Commissionrsquos
Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
33
The Decennial Cycle of Review
10-Year Window
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
3
The Higher Learning Commission
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
4
Basic Facts about Accreditation
Accreditation is a voluntary process of self evaluation and peer
evaluation that has two fundamental purposes quality assurance and quality improvement
The two types of voluntary accreditation are institutional accreditation [whole institution] specialized accreditation [specific program]
5
19 States
1003plusmn Institutions
The Higher Learning Commission Region
6
The Higher Learning Commission of NCA - Founded 1895
The Organization Member Institutions - copy1003 Location of Member Institutions - in 19 States
Decision-Making Processes and Peer Reviewers Corps Board of Trustees - 15-21 Members Institutional Actions Council - 26 Members Accreditation Review Council - 170 Members Peer Reviewer Corps -copy 1200 Reviewers
Full-time Staff Executive Director - 1 Directors [Including Asst amp Assoc) - 12 Other Full-time Staff - 21plusmn
7
Diversity of Mission among the Membership of Institutions [1003]
Two-year Institutions Four-year Bachelorrsquos Institutions Four-year Liberal Arts Institutions Comprehensive Institutions Tribal Colleges Faith Based Institutions Research Universities Single Purpose Institutions Public Private NFP and For Profit
8
Mission of The Higher Learning Commission of NCA
ldquoServing the common good by assuring and advancing the quality of higher learningrdquo
9
ldquoSpecial Connectionsrdquo
Professor Joseacute Colchado (Education) Director Bruce Fox (Honors Program) President John Haeger Vice President Fred Hurst (Extended Programs
and Dean of Distance Learning)
10
Mission of Northern Arizona University
ldquoProvide an outstanding undergraduate residential education strengthened by important research graduate and professional programs and a responsive distance learning network delivering programs throughout Arizonardquo
11
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Values
Excellence in Education Student Success Educational Access Diversity Integrity Civility
12
Northern Arizona Universityrsquo ldquoGoalsrdquo
Provide Undergraduate Education Excellence in a Residential Learning Community
Strengthen graduate education economic development and research
Increase Enrollment and Retention Provide Leadership in the Development
Use and Assessment of Technologies in Administrative Systems and Educational Programs
13
Northern Arizona Universityrsquo ldquoGoalsrdquo
Foster a Culture of Diversity Community and Citizenship
Become the Nationrsquos Leading University Serving Native Americans
Ensure Financial Stability and Growth
14
Todayrsquos Agenda Focus Accreditation and Other Matters The Higher Learning Commissionrsquos
Expectations Regarding Self-Study Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Interests
Prospective Character of the Self-Study and Review Institutional Capacity Strategies for Engaging the Campus Community
15
Prospective Character of the Self-Study and Review
Institutional Self-Study and Self-Reflection
Institutionrsquos Mission Values and Goals
Evaluation of the Whole Organization
Engage Multiple Constituencies
Build on Institutional Processes
Effective Leadership and Communication
Evidence of Fulfilling the Criteria for Accreditation
Production of a Self-Study Report
Use of Self-Study Findings to Inform Decision-making and Future Institutional Development
Hallmarks of an Effective Self-Study Process
16
Fundamental Shifts
Inputs
Teaching
Focus on Past
Autonomy
Outcomes
Learning
Focus on Future
Connectedness
17
Topical Areas of the Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
18
Two Evaluation Processes for Continued Accreditation
Institutional Self-Study
Peer Review Decision-making
Processes Continued
Accreditation --Ten-year Cycle
Self-Assessment Strategy Forum Action Projects Annual Updates Systems Appraisal Continued Accreditation
--Seven-Year Cycle
19
Criterion Structure
Criterion Statement
Core Components
Examplesof Evidence
20
1 - Mission amp Integrity1 - Mission amp Integrity
The organization operates with integrity to ensure the fulfillment of its mission
through structures and processes that involve the board administration faculty
staff and students
21
1 - Mission and Integrity
[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Articulation of the Mission2 Recognition of Diversity among Learners other Constituencies and Greater Society 3 Organizational Understanding of Mission4 Mission Supported through Organizational Structures5 Organizational Protection of the Mission Examples of Evidence
22
2 - Preparing for the Future2 - Preparing for the Future
The organizationrsquos allocation of resources and its processes for evaluation and
planning demonstrate its capacity to fulfill its mission improve the quality of its
education and respond to future challenges and opportunities
23
2 - Preparing for the Future[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Realistic Preparation for a Future Shaped by Societal and Economic Trends2 Resource Support for Maintaining and Strengthening Educational Programs3 Evaluation and Assessment Processes Show Effectiveness and Continuous Improvement4 Planning Levels Align with Mission and Capacity to Fulfill the Mission Examples of Evidence
24
3 - Student Learning and3 - Student Learning andEffective TeachingEffective Teaching
The organization provides evidence of student learning and teaching
effectiveness that demonstrates it is fulfilling its educational mission
25
3 - Student Learning and Effective Teaching[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Statements of Student Learning Outcomes That Make Effective Assessment Possible2 Organization Values and Supports Effective Teaching3 Organization Creates Effective Learning Environments4 Learning Resources Support Student Learning And Effective Teaching Examples of Evidence
26
4 - Acquisition Discovery amp4 - Acquisition Discovery ampApplication of KnowledgeApplication of Knowledge
The organization promotes a life of learning for its faculty administration
staff and students by fostering and supporting inquiry creativity practice and
social responsibility in ways consistent with its mission
27
4 - Acquisition Discovery andApplication of Knowledge
[Paraphrased]
1 Organization Demonstrates It Values a Life of Learning
2 Organization Demonstrates the Integral Nature of Knowledge and Skill Acquisition and Intellectual Inquiry3 Organization Assesses the Usefulness of Curricula to
Students Living and Working in a Global Diverse and Technological Society
4 Organization Support Responsible Acquisition Discovery and Application of Knowledge
Examples of Evidence
28
5 - Engagement and Service5 - Engagement and Service
As called for by its mission the organization identifies its constituencies
and serves them in ways both value
29
5 - Engagement and Service[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Organization Learns from Constituencies and Analyzes its Capacity to Serve Them2 Organizational Capacity and Commitment to Engage with Identified Constituencies and Communities3 Organization Demonstrates Responsiveness to Constituencies that Depend on It4 Internal and External Constituencies Value the Organizationrsquos Services Examples of Evidence
30
Cross-cutting Themes
Future-oriented
Learning-focused
Connected
Distinctive
31
Position Statements
Assessment of Student Learning
Diversity
General Education
32
Aligning an Institutionrsquos Mission and Outcomes with the Commissionrsquos
Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
33
The Decennial Cycle of Review
10-Year Window
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
4
Basic Facts about Accreditation
Accreditation is a voluntary process of self evaluation and peer
evaluation that has two fundamental purposes quality assurance and quality improvement
The two types of voluntary accreditation are institutional accreditation [whole institution] specialized accreditation [specific program]
5
19 States
1003plusmn Institutions
The Higher Learning Commission Region
6
The Higher Learning Commission of NCA - Founded 1895
The Organization Member Institutions - copy1003 Location of Member Institutions - in 19 States
Decision-Making Processes and Peer Reviewers Corps Board of Trustees - 15-21 Members Institutional Actions Council - 26 Members Accreditation Review Council - 170 Members Peer Reviewer Corps -copy 1200 Reviewers
Full-time Staff Executive Director - 1 Directors [Including Asst amp Assoc) - 12 Other Full-time Staff - 21plusmn
7
Diversity of Mission among the Membership of Institutions [1003]
Two-year Institutions Four-year Bachelorrsquos Institutions Four-year Liberal Arts Institutions Comprehensive Institutions Tribal Colleges Faith Based Institutions Research Universities Single Purpose Institutions Public Private NFP and For Profit
8
Mission of The Higher Learning Commission of NCA
ldquoServing the common good by assuring and advancing the quality of higher learningrdquo
9
ldquoSpecial Connectionsrdquo
Professor Joseacute Colchado (Education) Director Bruce Fox (Honors Program) President John Haeger Vice President Fred Hurst (Extended Programs
and Dean of Distance Learning)
10
Mission of Northern Arizona University
ldquoProvide an outstanding undergraduate residential education strengthened by important research graduate and professional programs and a responsive distance learning network delivering programs throughout Arizonardquo
11
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Values
Excellence in Education Student Success Educational Access Diversity Integrity Civility
12
Northern Arizona Universityrsquo ldquoGoalsrdquo
Provide Undergraduate Education Excellence in a Residential Learning Community
Strengthen graduate education economic development and research
Increase Enrollment and Retention Provide Leadership in the Development
Use and Assessment of Technologies in Administrative Systems and Educational Programs
13
Northern Arizona Universityrsquo ldquoGoalsrdquo
Foster a Culture of Diversity Community and Citizenship
Become the Nationrsquos Leading University Serving Native Americans
Ensure Financial Stability and Growth
14
Todayrsquos Agenda Focus Accreditation and Other Matters The Higher Learning Commissionrsquos
Expectations Regarding Self-Study Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Interests
Prospective Character of the Self-Study and Review Institutional Capacity Strategies for Engaging the Campus Community
15
Prospective Character of the Self-Study and Review
Institutional Self-Study and Self-Reflection
Institutionrsquos Mission Values and Goals
Evaluation of the Whole Organization
Engage Multiple Constituencies
Build on Institutional Processes
Effective Leadership and Communication
Evidence of Fulfilling the Criteria for Accreditation
Production of a Self-Study Report
Use of Self-Study Findings to Inform Decision-making and Future Institutional Development
Hallmarks of an Effective Self-Study Process
16
Fundamental Shifts
Inputs
Teaching
Focus on Past
Autonomy
Outcomes
Learning
Focus on Future
Connectedness
17
Topical Areas of the Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
18
Two Evaluation Processes for Continued Accreditation
Institutional Self-Study
Peer Review Decision-making
Processes Continued
Accreditation --Ten-year Cycle
Self-Assessment Strategy Forum Action Projects Annual Updates Systems Appraisal Continued Accreditation
--Seven-Year Cycle
19
Criterion Structure
Criterion Statement
Core Components
Examplesof Evidence
20
1 - Mission amp Integrity1 - Mission amp Integrity
The organization operates with integrity to ensure the fulfillment of its mission
through structures and processes that involve the board administration faculty
staff and students
21
1 - Mission and Integrity
[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Articulation of the Mission2 Recognition of Diversity among Learners other Constituencies and Greater Society 3 Organizational Understanding of Mission4 Mission Supported through Organizational Structures5 Organizational Protection of the Mission Examples of Evidence
22
2 - Preparing for the Future2 - Preparing for the Future
The organizationrsquos allocation of resources and its processes for evaluation and
planning demonstrate its capacity to fulfill its mission improve the quality of its
education and respond to future challenges and opportunities
23
2 - Preparing for the Future[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Realistic Preparation for a Future Shaped by Societal and Economic Trends2 Resource Support for Maintaining and Strengthening Educational Programs3 Evaluation and Assessment Processes Show Effectiveness and Continuous Improvement4 Planning Levels Align with Mission and Capacity to Fulfill the Mission Examples of Evidence
24
3 - Student Learning and3 - Student Learning andEffective TeachingEffective Teaching
The organization provides evidence of student learning and teaching
effectiveness that demonstrates it is fulfilling its educational mission
25
3 - Student Learning and Effective Teaching[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Statements of Student Learning Outcomes That Make Effective Assessment Possible2 Organization Values and Supports Effective Teaching3 Organization Creates Effective Learning Environments4 Learning Resources Support Student Learning And Effective Teaching Examples of Evidence
26
4 - Acquisition Discovery amp4 - Acquisition Discovery ampApplication of KnowledgeApplication of Knowledge
The organization promotes a life of learning for its faculty administration
staff and students by fostering and supporting inquiry creativity practice and
social responsibility in ways consistent with its mission
27
4 - Acquisition Discovery andApplication of Knowledge
[Paraphrased]
1 Organization Demonstrates It Values a Life of Learning
2 Organization Demonstrates the Integral Nature of Knowledge and Skill Acquisition and Intellectual Inquiry3 Organization Assesses the Usefulness of Curricula to
Students Living and Working in a Global Diverse and Technological Society
4 Organization Support Responsible Acquisition Discovery and Application of Knowledge
Examples of Evidence
28
5 - Engagement and Service5 - Engagement and Service
As called for by its mission the organization identifies its constituencies
and serves them in ways both value
29
5 - Engagement and Service[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Organization Learns from Constituencies and Analyzes its Capacity to Serve Them2 Organizational Capacity and Commitment to Engage with Identified Constituencies and Communities3 Organization Demonstrates Responsiveness to Constituencies that Depend on It4 Internal and External Constituencies Value the Organizationrsquos Services Examples of Evidence
30
Cross-cutting Themes
Future-oriented
Learning-focused
Connected
Distinctive
31
Position Statements
Assessment of Student Learning
Diversity
General Education
32
Aligning an Institutionrsquos Mission and Outcomes with the Commissionrsquos
Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
33
The Decennial Cycle of Review
10-Year Window
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
5
19 States
1003plusmn Institutions
The Higher Learning Commission Region
6
The Higher Learning Commission of NCA - Founded 1895
The Organization Member Institutions - copy1003 Location of Member Institutions - in 19 States
Decision-Making Processes and Peer Reviewers Corps Board of Trustees - 15-21 Members Institutional Actions Council - 26 Members Accreditation Review Council - 170 Members Peer Reviewer Corps -copy 1200 Reviewers
Full-time Staff Executive Director - 1 Directors [Including Asst amp Assoc) - 12 Other Full-time Staff - 21plusmn
7
Diversity of Mission among the Membership of Institutions [1003]
Two-year Institutions Four-year Bachelorrsquos Institutions Four-year Liberal Arts Institutions Comprehensive Institutions Tribal Colleges Faith Based Institutions Research Universities Single Purpose Institutions Public Private NFP and For Profit
8
Mission of The Higher Learning Commission of NCA
ldquoServing the common good by assuring and advancing the quality of higher learningrdquo
9
ldquoSpecial Connectionsrdquo
Professor Joseacute Colchado (Education) Director Bruce Fox (Honors Program) President John Haeger Vice President Fred Hurst (Extended Programs
and Dean of Distance Learning)
10
Mission of Northern Arizona University
ldquoProvide an outstanding undergraduate residential education strengthened by important research graduate and professional programs and a responsive distance learning network delivering programs throughout Arizonardquo
11
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Values
Excellence in Education Student Success Educational Access Diversity Integrity Civility
12
Northern Arizona Universityrsquo ldquoGoalsrdquo
Provide Undergraduate Education Excellence in a Residential Learning Community
Strengthen graduate education economic development and research
Increase Enrollment and Retention Provide Leadership in the Development
Use and Assessment of Technologies in Administrative Systems and Educational Programs
13
Northern Arizona Universityrsquo ldquoGoalsrdquo
Foster a Culture of Diversity Community and Citizenship
Become the Nationrsquos Leading University Serving Native Americans
Ensure Financial Stability and Growth
14
Todayrsquos Agenda Focus Accreditation and Other Matters The Higher Learning Commissionrsquos
Expectations Regarding Self-Study Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Interests
Prospective Character of the Self-Study and Review Institutional Capacity Strategies for Engaging the Campus Community
15
Prospective Character of the Self-Study and Review
Institutional Self-Study and Self-Reflection
Institutionrsquos Mission Values and Goals
Evaluation of the Whole Organization
Engage Multiple Constituencies
Build on Institutional Processes
Effective Leadership and Communication
Evidence of Fulfilling the Criteria for Accreditation
Production of a Self-Study Report
Use of Self-Study Findings to Inform Decision-making and Future Institutional Development
Hallmarks of an Effective Self-Study Process
16
Fundamental Shifts
Inputs
Teaching
Focus on Past
Autonomy
Outcomes
Learning
Focus on Future
Connectedness
17
Topical Areas of the Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
18
Two Evaluation Processes for Continued Accreditation
Institutional Self-Study
Peer Review Decision-making
Processes Continued
Accreditation --Ten-year Cycle
Self-Assessment Strategy Forum Action Projects Annual Updates Systems Appraisal Continued Accreditation
--Seven-Year Cycle
19
Criterion Structure
Criterion Statement
Core Components
Examplesof Evidence
20
1 - Mission amp Integrity1 - Mission amp Integrity
The organization operates with integrity to ensure the fulfillment of its mission
through structures and processes that involve the board administration faculty
staff and students
21
1 - Mission and Integrity
[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Articulation of the Mission2 Recognition of Diversity among Learners other Constituencies and Greater Society 3 Organizational Understanding of Mission4 Mission Supported through Organizational Structures5 Organizational Protection of the Mission Examples of Evidence
22
2 - Preparing for the Future2 - Preparing for the Future
The organizationrsquos allocation of resources and its processes for evaluation and
planning demonstrate its capacity to fulfill its mission improve the quality of its
education and respond to future challenges and opportunities
23
2 - Preparing for the Future[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Realistic Preparation for a Future Shaped by Societal and Economic Trends2 Resource Support for Maintaining and Strengthening Educational Programs3 Evaluation and Assessment Processes Show Effectiveness and Continuous Improvement4 Planning Levels Align with Mission and Capacity to Fulfill the Mission Examples of Evidence
24
3 - Student Learning and3 - Student Learning andEffective TeachingEffective Teaching
The organization provides evidence of student learning and teaching
effectiveness that demonstrates it is fulfilling its educational mission
25
3 - Student Learning and Effective Teaching[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Statements of Student Learning Outcomes That Make Effective Assessment Possible2 Organization Values and Supports Effective Teaching3 Organization Creates Effective Learning Environments4 Learning Resources Support Student Learning And Effective Teaching Examples of Evidence
26
4 - Acquisition Discovery amp4 - Acquisition Discovery ampApplication of KnowledgeApplication of Knowledge
The organization promotes a life of learning for its faculty administration
staff and students by fostering and supporting inquiry creativity practice and
social responsibility in ways consistent with its mission
27
4 - Acquisition Discovery andApplication of Knowledge
[Paraphrased]
1 Organization Demonstrates It Values a Life of Learning
2 Organization Demonstrates the Integral Nature of Knowledge and Skill Acquisition and Intellectual Inquiry3 Organization Assesses the Usefulness of Curricula to
Students Living and Working in a Global Diverse and Technological Society
4 Organization Support Responsible Acquisition Discovery and Application of Knowledge
Examples of Evidence
28
5 - Engagement and Service5 - Engagement and Service
As called for by its mission the organization identifies its constituencies
and serves them in ways both value
29
5 - Engagement and Service[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Organization Learns from Constituencies and Analyzes its Capacity to Serve Them2 Organizational Capacity and Commitment to Engage with Identified Constituencies and Communities3 Organization Demonstrates Responsiveness to Constituencies that Depend on It4 Internal and External Constituencies Value the Organizationrsquos Services Examples of Evidence
30
Cross-cutting Themes
Future-oriented
Learning-focused
Connected
Distinctive
31
Position Statements
Assessment of Student Learning
Diversity
General Education
32
Aligning an Institutionrsquos Mission and Outcomes with the Commissionrsquos
Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
33
The Decennial Cycle of Review
10-Year Window
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
6
The Higher Learning Commission of NCA - Founded 1895
The Organization Member Institutions - copy1003 Location of Member Institutions - in 19 States
Decision-Making Processes and Peer Reviewers Corps Board of Trustees - 15-21 Members Institutional Actions Council - 26 Members Accreditation Review Council - 170 Members Peer Reviewer Corps -copy 1200 Reviewers
Full-time Staff Executive Director - 1 Directors [Including Asst amp Assoc) - 12 Other Full-time Staff - 21plusmn
7
Diversity of Mission among the Membership of Institutions [1003]
Two-year Institutions Four-year Bachelorrsquos Institutions Four-year Liberal Arts Institutions Comprehensive Institutions Tribal Colleges Faith Based Institutions Research Universities Single Purpose Institutions Public Private NFP and For Profit
8
Mission of The Higher Learning Commission of NCA
ldquoServing the common good by assuring and advancing the quality of higher learningrdquo
9
ldquoSpecial Connectionsrdquo
Professor Joseacute Colchado (Education) Director Bruce Fox (Honors Program) President John Haeger Vice President Fred Hurst (Extended Programs
and Dean of Distance Learning)
10
Mission of Northern Arizona University
ldquoProvide an outstanding undergraduate residential education strengthened by important research graduate and professional programs and a responsive distance learning network delivering programs throughout Arizonardquo
11
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Values
Excellence in Education Student Success Educational Access Diversity Integrity Civility
12
Northern Arizona Universityrsquo ldquoGoalsrdquo
Provide Undergraduate Education Excellence in a Residential Learning Community
Strengthen graduate education economic development and research
Increase Enrollment and Retention Provide Leadership in the Development
Use and Assessment of Technologies in Administrative Systems and Educational Programs
13
Northern Arizona Universityrsquo ldquoGoalsrdquo
Foster a Culture of Diversity Community and Citizenship
Become the Nationrsquos Leading University Serving Native Americans
Ensure Financial Stability and Growth
14
Todayrsquos Agenda Focus Accreditation and Other Matters The Higher Learning Commissionrsquos
Expectations Regarding Self-Study Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Interests
Prospective Character of the Self-Study and Review Institutional Capacity Strategies for Engaging the Campus Community
15
Prospective Character of the Self-Study and Review
Institutional Self-Study and Self-Reflection
Institutionrsquos Mission Values and Goals
Evaluation of the Whole Organization
Engage Multiple Constituencies
Build on Institutional Processes
Effective Leadership and Communication
Evidence of Fulfilling the Criteria for Accreditation
Production of a Self-Study Report
Use of Self-Study Findings to Inform Decision-making and Future Institutional Development
Hallmarks of an Effective Self-Study Process
16
Fundamental Shifts
Inputs
Teaching
Focus on Past
Autonomy
Outcomes
Learning
Focus on Future
Connectedness
17
Topical Areas of the Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
18
Two Evaluation Processes for Continued Accreditation
Institutional Self-Study
Peer Review Decision-making
Processes Continued
Accreditation --Ten-year Cycle
Self-Assessment Strategy Forum Action Projects Annual Updates Systems Appraisal Continued Accreditation
--Seven-Year Cycle
19
Criterion Structure
Criterion Statement
Core Components
Examplesof Evidence
20
1 - Mission amp Integrity1 - Mission amp Integrity
The organization operates with integrity to ensure the fulfillment of its mission
through structures and processes that involve the board administration faculty
staff and students
21
1 - Mission and Integrity
[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Articulation of the Mission2 Recognition of Diversity among Learners other Constituencies and Greater Society 3 Organizational Understanding of Mission4 Mission Supported through Organizational Structures5 Organizational Protection of the Mission Examples of Evidence
22
2 - Preparing for the Future2 - Preparing for the Future
The organizationrsquos allocation of resources and its processes for evaluation and
planning demonstrate its capacity to fulfill its mission improve the quality of its
education and respond to future challenges and opportunities
23
2 - Preparing for the Future[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Realistic Preparation for a Future Shaped by Societal and Economic Trends2 Resource Support for Maintaining and Strengthening Educational Programs3 Evaluation and Assessment Processes Show Effectiveness and Continuous Improvement4 Planning Levels Align with Mission and Capacity to Fulfill the Mission Examples of Evidence
24
3 - Student Learning and3 - Student Learning andEffective TeachingEffective Teaching
The organization provides evidence of student learning and teaching
effectiveness that demonstrates it is fulfilling its educational mission
25
3 - Student Learning and Effective Teaching[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Statements of Student Learning Outcomes That Make Effective Assessment Possible2 Organization Values and Supports Effective Teaching3 Organization Creates Effective Learning Environments4 Learning Resources Support Student Learning And Effective Teaching Examples of Evidence
26
4 - Acquisition Discovery amp4 - Acquisition Discovery ampApplication of KnowledgeApplication of Knowledge
The organization promotes a life of learning for its faculty administration
staff and students by fostering and supporting inquiry creativity practice and
social responsibility in ways consistent with its mission
27
4 - Acquisition Discovery andApplication of Knowledge
[Paraphrased]
1 Organization Demonstrates It Values a Life of Learning
2 Organization Demonstrates the Integral Nature of Knowledge and Skill Acquisition and Intellectual Inquiry3 Organization Assesses the Usefulness of Curricula to
Students Living and Working in a Global Diverse and Technological Society
4 Organization Support Responsible Acquisition Discovery and Application of Knowledge
Examples of Evidence
28
5 - Engagement and Service5 - Engagement and Service
As called for by its mission the organization identifies its constituencies
and serves them in ways both value
29
5 - Engagement and Service[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Organization Learns from Constituencies and Analyzes its Capacity to Serve Them2 Organizational Capacity and Commitment to Engage with Identified Constituencies and Communities3 Organization Demonstrates Responsiveness to Constituencies that Depend on It4 Internal and External Constituencies Value the Organizationrsquos Services Examples of Evidence
30
Cross-cutting Themes
Future-oriented
Learning-focused
Connected
Distinctive
31
Position Statements
Assessment of Student Learning
Diversity
General Education
32
Aligning an Institutionrsquos Mission and Outcomes with the Commissionrsquos
Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
33
The Decennial Cycle of Review
10-Year Window
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
7
Diversity of Mission among the Membership of Institutions [1003]
Two-year Institutions Four-year Bachelorrsquos Institutions Four-year Liberal Arts Institutions Comprehensive Institutions Tribal Colleges Faith Based Institutions Research Universities Single Purpose Institutions Public Private NFP and For Profit
8
Mission of The Higher Learning Commission of NCA
ldquoServing the common good by assuring and advancing the quality of higher learningrdquo
9
ldquoSpecial Connectionsrdquo
Professor Joseacute Colchado (Education) Director Bruce Fox (Honors Program) President John Haeger Vice President Fred Hurst (Extended Programs
and Dean of Distance Learning)
10
Mission of Northern Arizona University
ldquoProvide an outstanding undergraduate residential education strengthened by important research graduate and professional programs and a responsive distance learning network delivering programs throughout Arizonardquo
11
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Values
Excellence in Education Student Success Educational Access Diversity Integrity Civility
12
Northern Arizona Universityrsquo ldquoGoalsrdquo
Provide Undergraduate Education Excellence in a Residential Learning Community
Strengthen graduate education economic development and research
Increase Enrollment and Retention Provide Leadership in the Development
Use and Assessment of Technologies in Administrative Systems and Educational Programs
13
Northern Arizona Universityrsquo ldquoGoalsrdquo
Foster a Culture of Diversity Community and Citizenship
Become the Nationrsquos Leading University Serving Native Americans
Ensure Financial Stability and Growth
14
Todayrsquos Agenda Focus Accreditation and Other Matters The Higher Learning Commissionrsquos
Expectations Regarding Self-Study Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Interests
Prospective Character of the Self-Study and Review Institutional Capacity Strategies for Engaging the Campus Community
15
Prospective Character of the Self-Study and Review
Institutional Self-Study and Self-Reflection
Institutionrsquos Mission Values and Goals
Evaluation of the Whole Organization
Engage Multiple Constituencies
Build on Institutional Processes
Effective Leadership and Communication
Evidence of Fulfilling the Criteria for Accreditation
Production of a Self-Study Report
Use of Self-Study Findings to Inform Decision-making and Future Institutional Development
Hallmarks of an Effective Self-Study Process
16
Fundamental Shifts
Inputs
Teaching
Focus on Past
Autonomy
Outcomes
Learning
Focus on Future
Connectedness
17
Topical Areas of the Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
18
Two Evaluation Processes for Continued Accreditation
Institutional Self-Study
Peer Review Decision-making
Processes Continued
Accreditation --Ten-year Cycle
Self-Assessment Strategy Forum Action Projects Annual Updates Systems Appraisal Continued Accreditation
--Seven-Year Cycle
19
Criterion Structure
Criterion Statement
Core Components
Examplesof Evidence
20
1 - Mission amp Integrity1 - Mission amp Integrity
The organization operates with integrity to ensure the fulfillment of its mission
through structures and processes that involve the board administration faculty
staff and students
21
1 - Mission and Integrity
[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Articulation of the Mission2 Recognition of Diversity among Learners other Constituencies and Greater Society 3 Organizational Understanding of Mission4 Mission Supported through Organizational Structures5 Organizational Protection of the Mission Examples of Evidence
22
2 - Preparing for the Future2 - Preparing for the Future
The organizationrsquos allocation of resources and its processes for evaluation and
planning demonstrate its capacity to fulfill its mission improve the quality of its
education and respond to future challenges and opportunities
23
2 - Preparing for the Future[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Realistic Preparation for a Future Shaped by Societal and Economic Trends2 Resource Support for Maintaining and Strengthening Educational Programs3 Evaluation and Assessment Processes Show Effectiveness and Continuous Improvement4 Planning Levels Align with Mission and Capacity to Fulfill the Mission Examples of Evidence
24
3 - Student Learning and3 - Student Learning andEffective TeachingEffective Teaching
The organization provides evidence of student learning and teaching
effectiveness that demonstrates it is fulfilling its educational mission
25
3 - Student Learning and Effective Teaching[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Statements of Student Learning Outcomes That Make Effective Assessment Possible2 Organization Values and Supports Effective Teaching3 Organization Creates Effective Learning Environments4 Learning Resources Support Student Learning And Effective Teaching Examples of Evidence
26
4 - Acquisition Discovery amp4 - Acquisition Discovery ampApplication of KnowledgeApplication of Knowledge
The organization promotes a life of learning for its faculty administration
staff and students by fostering and supporting inquiry creativity practice and
social responsibility in ways consistent with its mission
27
4 - Acquisition Discovery andApplication of Knowledge
[Paraphrased]
1 Organization Demonstrates It Values a Life of Learning
2 Organization Demonstrates the Integral Nature of Knowledge and Skill Acquisition and Intellectual Inquiry3 Organization Assesses the Usefulness of Curricula to
Students Living and Working in a Global Diverse and Technological Society
4 Organization Support Responsible Acquisition Discovery and Application of Knowledge
Examples of Evidence
28
5 - Engagement and Service5 - Engagement and Service
As called for by its mission the organization identifies its constituencies
and serves them in ways both value
29
5 - Engagement and Service[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Organization Learns from Constituencies and Analyzes its Capacity to Serve Them2 Organizational Capacity and Commitment to Engage with Identified Constituencies and Communities3 Organization Demonstrates Responsiveness to Constituencies that Depend on It4 Internal and External Constituencies Value the Organizationrsquos Services Examples of Evidence
30
Cross-cutting Themes
Future-oriented
Learning-focused
Connected
Distinctive
31
Position Statements
Assessment of Student Learning
Diversity
General Education
32
Aligning an Institutionrsquos Mission and Outcomes with the Commissionrsquos
Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
33
The Decennial Cycle of Review
10-Year Window
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
8
Mission of The Higher Learning Commission of NCA
ldquoServing the common good by assuring and advancing the quality of higher learningrdquo
9
ldquoSpecial Connectionsrdquo
Professor Joseacute Colchado (Education) Director Bruce Fox (Honors Program) President John Haeger Vice President Fred Hurst (Extended Programs
and Dean of Distance Learning)
10
Mission of Northern Arizona University
ldquoProvide an outstanding undergraduate residential education strengthened by important research graduate and professional programs and a responsive distance learning network delivering programs throughout Arizonardquo
11
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Values
Excellence in Education Student Success Educational Access Diversity Integrity Civility
12
Northern Arizona Universityrsquo ldquoGoalsrdquo
Provide Undergraduate Education Excellence in a Residential Learning Community
Strengthen graduate education economic development and research
Increase Enrollment and Retention Provide Leadership in the Development
Use and Assessment of Technologies in Administrative Systems and Educational Programs
13
Northern Arizona Universityrsquo ldquoGoalsrdquo
Foster a Culture of Diversity Community and Citizenship
Become the Nationrsquos Leading University Serving Native Americans
Ensure Financial Stability and Growth
14
Todayrsquos Agenda Focus Accreditation and Other Matters The Higher Learning Commissionrsquos
Expectations Regarding Self-Study Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Interests
Prospective Character of the Self-Study and Review Institutional Capacity Strategies for Engaging the Campus Community
15
Prospective Character of the Self-Study and Review
Institutional Self-Study and Self-Reflection
Institutionrsquos Mission Values and Goals
Evaluation of the Whole Organization
Engage Multiple Constituencies
Build on Institutional Processes
Effective Leadership and Communication
Evidence of Fulfilling the Criteria for Accreditation
Production of a Self-Study Report
Use of Self-Study Findings to Inform Decision-making and Future Institutional Development
Hallmarks of an Effective Self-Study Process
16
Fundamental Shifts
Inputs
Teaching
Focus on Past
Autonomy
Outcomes
Learning
Focus on Future
Connectedness
17
Topical Areas of the Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
18
Two Evaluation Processes for Continued Accreditation
Institutional Self-Study
Peer Review Decision-making
Processes Continued
Accreditation --Ten-year Cycle
Self-Assessment Strategy Forum Action Projects Annual Updates Systems Appraisal Continued Accreditation
--Seven-Year Cycle
19
Criterion Structure
Criterion Statement
Core Components
Examplesof Evidence
20
1 - Mission amp Integrity1 - Mission amp Integrity
The organization operates with integrity to ensure the fulfillment of its mission
through structures and processes that involve the board administration faculty
staff and students
21
1 - Mission and Integrity
[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Articulation of the Mission2 Recognition of Diversity among Learners other Constituencies and Greater Society 3 Organizational Understanding of Mission4 Mission Supported through Organizational Structures5 Organizational Protection of the Mission Examples of Evidence
22
2 - Preparing for the Future2 - Preparing for the Future
The organizationrsquos allocation of resources and its processes for evaluation and
planning demonstrate its capacity to fulfill its mission improve the quality of its
education and respond to future challenges and opportunities
23
2 - Preparing for the Future[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Realistic Preparation for a Future Shaped by Societal and Economic Trends2 Resource Support for Maintaining and Strengthening Educational Programs3 Evaluation and Assessment Processes Show Effectiveness and Continuous Improvement4 Planning Levels Align with Mission and Capacity to Fulfill the Mission Examples of Evidence
24
3 - Student Learning and3 - Student Learning andEffective TeachingEffective Teaching
The organization provides evidence of student learning and teaching
effectiveness that demonstrates it is fulfilling its educational mission
25
3 - Student Learning and Effective Teaching[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Statements of Student Learning Outcomes That Make Effective Assessment Possible2 Organization Values and Supports Effective Teaching3 Organization Creates Effective Learning Environments4 Learning Resources Support Student Learning And Effective Teaching Examples of Evidence
26
4 - Acquisition Discovery amp4 - Acquisition Discovery ampApplication of KnowledgeApplication of Knowledge
The organization promotes a life of learning for its faculty administration
staff and students by fostering and supporting inquiry creativity practice and
social responsibility in ways consistent with its mission
27
4 - Acquisition Discovery andApplication of Knowledge
[Paraphrased]
1 Organization Demonstrates It Values a Life of Learning
2 Organization Demonstrates the Integral Nature of Knowledge and Skill Acquisition and Intellectual Inquiry3 Organization Assesses the Usefulness of Curricula to
Students Living and Working in a Global Diverse and Technological Society
4 Organization Support Responsible Acquisition Discovery and Application of Knowledge
Examples of Evidence
28
5 - Engagement and Service5 - Engagement and Service
As called for by its mission the organization identifies its constituencies
and serves them in ways both value
29
5 - Engagement and Service[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Organization Learns from Constituencies and Analyzes its Capacity to Serve Them2 Organizational Capacity and Commitment to Engage with Identified Constituencies and Communities3 Organization Demonstrates Responsiveness to Constituencies that Depend on It4 Internal and External Constituencies Value the Organizationrsquos Services Examples of Evidence
30
Cross-cutting Themes
Future-oriented
Learning-focused
Connected
Distinctive
31
Position Statements
Assessment of Student Learning
Diversity
General Education
32
Aligning an Institutionrsquos Mission and Outcomes with the Commissionrsquos
Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
33
The Decennial Cycle of Review
10-Year Window
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
9
ldquoSpecial Connectionsrdquo
Professor Joseacute Colchado (Education) Director Bruce Fox (Honors Program) President John Haeger Vice President Fred Hurst (Extended Programs
and Dean of Distance Learning)
10
Mission of Northern Arizona University
ldquoProvide an outstanding undergraduate residential education strengthened by important research graduate and professional programs and a responsive distance learning network delivering programs throughout Arizonardquo
11
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Values
Excellence in Education Student Success Educational Access Diversity Integrity Civility
12
Northern Arizona Universityrsquo ldquoGoalsrdquo
Provide Undergraduate Education Excellence in a Residential Learning Community
Strengthen graduate education economic development and research
Increase Enrollment and Retention Provide Leadership in the Development
Use and Assessment of Technologies in Administrative Systems and Educational Programs
13
Northern Arizona Universityrsquo ldquoGoalsrdquo
Foster a Culture of Diversity Community and Citizenship
Become the Nationrsquos Leading University Serving Native Americans
Ensure Financial Stability and Growth
14
Todayrsquos Agenda Focus Accreditation and Other Matters The Higher Learning Commissionrsquos
Expectations Regarding Self-Study Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Interests
Prospective Character of the Self-Study and Review Institutional Capacity Strategies for Engaging the Campus Community
15
Prospective Character of the Self-Study and Review
Institutional Self-Study and Self-Reflection
Institutionrsquos Mission Values and Goals
Evaluation of the Whole Organization
Engage Multiple Constituencies
Build on Institutional Processes
Effective Leadership and Communication
Evidence of Fulfilling the Criteria for Accreditation
Production of a Self-Study Report
Use of Self-Study Findings to Inform Decision-making and Future Institutional Development
Hallmarks of an Effective Self-Study Process
16
Fundamental Shifts
Inputs
Teaching
Focus on Past
Autonomy
Outcomes
Learning
Focus on Future
Connectedness
17
Topical Areas of the Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
18
Two Evaluation Processes for Continued Accreditation
Institutional Self-Study
Peer Review Decision-making
Processes Continued
Accreditation --Ten-year Cycle
Self-Assessment Strategy Forum Action Projects Annual Updates Systems Appraisal Continued Accreditation
--Seven-Year Cycle
19
Criterion Structure
Criterion Statement
Core Components
Examplesof Evidence
20
1 - Mission amp Integrity1 - Mission amp Integrity
The organization operates with integrity to ensure the fulfillment of its mission
through structures and processes that involve the board administration faculty
staff and students
21
1 - Mission and Integrity
[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Articulation of the Mission2 Recognition of Diversity among Learners other Constituencies and Greater Society 3 Organizational Understanding of Mission4 Mission Supported through Organizational Structures5 Organizational Protection of the Mission Examples of Evidence
22
2 - Preparing for the Future2 - Preparing for the Future
The organizationrsquos allocation of resources and its processes for evaluation and
planning demonstrate its capacity to fulfill its mission improve the quality of its
education and respond to future challenges and opportunities
23
2 - Preparing for the Future[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Realistic Preparation for a Future Shaped by Societal and Economic Trends2 Resource Support for Maintaining and Strengthening Educational Programs3 Evaluation and Assessment Processes Show Effectiveness and Continuous Improvement4 Planning Levels Align with Mission and Capacity to Fulfill the Mission Examples of Evidence
24
3 - Student Learning and3 - Student Learning andEffective TeachingEffective Teaching
The organization provides evidence of student learning and teaching
effectiveness that demonstrates it is fulfilling its educational mission
25
3 - Student Learning and Effective Teaching[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Statements of Student Learning Outcomes That Make Effective Assessment Possible2 Organization Values and Supports Effective Teaching3 Organization Creates Effective Learning Environments4 Learning Resources Support Student Learning And Effective Teaching Examples of Evidence
26
4 - Acquisition Discovery amp4 - Acquisition Discovery ampApplication of KnowledgeApplication of Knowledge
The organization promotes a life of learning for its faculty administration
staff and students by fostering and supporting inquiry creativity practice and
social responsibility in ways consistent with its mission
27
4 - Acquisition Discovery andApplication of Knowledge
[Paraphrased]
1 Organization Demonstrates It Values a Life of Learning
2 Organization Demonstrates the Integral Nature of Knowledge and Skill Acquisition and Intellectual Inquiry3 Organization Assesses the Usefulness of Curricula to
Students Living and Working in a Global Diverse and Technological Society
4 Organization Support Responsible Acquisition Discovery and Application of Knowledge
Examples of Evidence
28
5 - Engagement and Service5 - Engagement and Service
As called for by its mission the organization identifies its constituencies
and serves them in ways both value
29
5 - Engagement and Service[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Organization Learns from Constituencies and Analyzes its Capacity to Serve Them2 Organizational Capacity and Commitment to Engage with Identified Constituencies and Communities3 Organization Demonstrates Responsiveness to Constituencies that Depend on It4 Internal and External Constituencies Value the Organizationrsquos Services Examples of Evidence
30
Cross-cutting Themes
Future-oriented
Learning-focused
Connected
Distinctive
31
Position Statements
Assessment of Student Learning
Diversity
General Education
32
Aligning an Institutionrsquos Mission and Outcomes with the Commissionrsquos
Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
33
The Decennial Cycle of Review
10-Year Window
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
10
Mission of Northern Arizona University
ldquoProvide an outstanding undergraduate residential education strengthened by important research graduate and professional programs and a responsive distance learning network delivering programs throughout Arizonardquo
11
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Values
Excellence in Education Student Success Educational Access Diversity Integrity Civility
12
Northern Arizona Universityrsquo ldquoGoalsrdquo
Provide Undergraduate Education Excellence in a Residential Learning Community
Strengthen graduate education economic development and research
Increase Enrollment and Retention Provide Leadership in the Development
Use and Assessment of Technologies in Administrative Systems and Educational Programs
13
Northern Arizona Universityrsquo ldquoGoalsrdquo
Foster a Culture of Diversity Community and Citizenship
Become the Nationrsquos Leading University Serving Native Americans
Ensure Financial Stability and Growth
14
Todayrsquos Agenda Focus Accreditation and Other Matters The Higher Learning Commissionrsquos
Expectations Regarding Self-Study Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Interests
Prospective Character of the Self-Study and Review Institutional Capacity Strategies for Engaging the Campus Community
15
Prospective Character of the Self-Study and Review
Institutional Self-Study and Self-Reflection
Institutionrsquos Mission Values and Goals
Evaluation of the Whole Organization
Engage Multiple Constituencies
Build on Institutional Processes
Effective Leadership and Communication
Evidence of Fulfilling the Criteria for Accreditation
Production of a Self-Study Report
Use of Self-Study Findings to Inform Decision-making and Future Institutional Development
Hallmarks of an Effective Self-Study Process
16
Fundamental Shifts
Inputs
Teaching
Focus on Past
Autonomy
Outcomes
Learning
Focus on Future
Connectedness
17
Topical Areas of the Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
18
Two Evaluation Processes for Continued Accreditation
Institutional Self-Study
Peer Review Decision-making
Processes Continued
Accreditation --Ten-year Cycle
Self-Assessment Strategy Forum Action Projects Annual Updates Systems Appraisal Continued Accreditation
--Seven-Year Cycle
19
Criterion Structure
Criterion Statement
Core Components
Examplesof Evidence
20
1 - Mission amp Integrity1 - Mission amp Integrity
The organization operates with integrity to ensure the fulfillment of its mission
through structures and processes that involve the board administration faculty
staff and students
21
1 - Mission and Integrity
[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Articulation of the Mission2 Recognition of Diversity among Learners other Constituencies and Greater Society 3 Organizational Understanding of Mission4 Mission Supported through Organizational Structures5 Organizational Protection of the Mission Examples of Evidence
22
2 - Preparing for the Future2 - Preparing for the Future
The organizationrsquos allocation of resources and its processes for evaluation and
planning demonstrate its capacity to fulfill its mission improve the quality of its
education and respond to future challenges and opportunities
23
2 - Preparing for the Future[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Realistic Preparation for a Future Shaped by Societal and Economic Trends2 Resource Support for Maintaining and Strengthening Educational Programs3 Evaluation and Assessment Processes Show Effectiveness and Continuous Improvement4 Planning Levels Align with Mission and Capacity to Fulfill the Mission Examples of Evidence
24
3 - Student Learning and3 - Student Learning andEffective TeachingEffective Teaching
The organization provides evidence of student learning and teaching
effectiveness that demonstrates it is fulfilling its educational mission
25
3 - Student Learning and Effective Teaching[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Statements of Student Learning Outcomes That Make Effective Assessment Possible2 Organization Values and Supports Effective Teaching3 Organization Creates Effective Learning Environments4 Learning Resources Support Student Learning And Effective Teaching Examples of Evidence
26
4 - Acquisition Discovery amp4 - Acquisition Discovery ampApplication of KnowledgeApplication of Knowledge
The organization promotes a life of learning for its faculty administration
staff and students by fostering and supporting inquiry creativity practice and
social responsibility in ways consistent with its mission
27
4 - Acquisition Discovery andApplication of Knowledge
[Paraphrased]
1 Organization Demonstrates It Values a Life of Learning
2 Organization Demonstrates the Integral Nature of Knowledge and Skill Acquisition and Intellectual Inquiry3 Organization Assesses the Usefulness of Curricula to
Students Living and Working in a Global Diverse and Technological Society
4 Organization Support Responsible Acquisition Discovery and Application of Knowledge
Examples of Evidence
28
5 - Engagement and Service5 - Engagement and Service
As called for by its mission the organization identifies its constituencies
and serves them in ways both value
29
5 - Engagement and Service[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Organization Learns from Constituencies and Analyzes its Capacity to Serve Them2 Organizational Capacity and Commitment to Engage with Identified Constituencies and Communities3 Organization Demonstrates Responsiveness to Constituencies that Depend on It4 Internal and External Constituencies Value the Organizationrsquos Services Examples of Evidence
30
Cross-cutting Themes
Future-oriented
Learning-focused
Connected
Distinctive
31
Position Statements
Assessment of Student Learning
Diversity
General Education
32
Aligning an Institutionrsquos Mission and Outcomes with the Commissionrsquos
Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
33
The Decennial Cycle of Review
10-Year Window
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
11
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Values
Excellence in Education Student Success Educational Access Diversity Integrity Civility
12
Northern Arizona Universityrsquo ldquoGoalsrdquo
Provide Undergraduate Education Excellence in a Residential Learning Community
Strengthen graduate education economic development and research
Increase Enrollment and Retention Provide Leadership in the Development
Use and Assessment of Technologies in Administrative Systems and Educational Programs
13
Northern Arizona Universityrsquo ldquoGoalsrdquo
Foster a Culture of Diversity Community and Citizenship
Become the Nationrsquos Leading University Serving Native Americans
Ensure Financial Stability and Growth
14
Todayrsquos Agenda Focus Accreditation and Other Matters The Higher Learning Commissionrsquos
Expectations Regarding Self-Study Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Interests
Prospective Character of the Self-Study and Review Institutional Capacity Strategies for Engaging the Campus Community
15
Prospective Character of the Self-Study and Review
Institutional Self-Study and Self-Reflection
Institutionrsquos Mission Values and Goals
Evaluation of the Whole Organization
Engage Multiple Constituencies
Build on Institutional Processes
Effective Leadership and Communication
Evidence of Fulfilling the Criteria for Accreditation
Production of a Self-Study Report
Use of Self-Study Findings to Inform Decision-making and Future Institutional Development
Hallmarks of an Effective Self-Study Process
16
Fundamental Shifts
Inputs
Teaching
Focus on Past
Autonomy
Outcomes
Learning
Focus on Future
Connectedness
17
Topical Areas of the Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
18
Two Evaluation Processes for Continued Accreditation
Institutional Self-Study
Peer Review Decision-making
Processes Continued
Accreditation --Ten-year Cycle
Self-Assessment Strategy Forum Action Projects Annual Updates Systems Appraisal Continued Accreditation
--Seven-Year Cycle
19
Criterion Structure
Criterion Statement
Core Components
Examplesof Evidence
20
1 - Mission amp Integrity1 - Mission amp Integrity
The organization operates with integrity to ensure the fulfillment of its mission
through structures and processes that involve the board administration faculty
staff and students
21
1 - Mission and Integrity
[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Articulation of the Mission2 Recognition of Diversity among Learners other Constituencies and Greater Society 3 Organizational Understanding of Mission4 Mission Supported through Organizational Structures5 Organizational Protection of the Mission Examples of Evidence
22
2 - Preparing for the Future2 - Preparing for the Future
The organizationrsquos allocation of resources and its processes for evaluation and
planning demonstrate its capacity to fulfill its mission improve the quality of its
education and respond to future challenges and opportunities
23
2 - Preparing for the Future[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Realistic Preparation for a Future Shaped by Societal and Economic Trends2 Resource Support for Maintaining and Strengthening Educational Programs3 Evaluation and Assessment Processes Show Effectiveness and Continuous Improvement4 Planning Levels Align with Mission and Capacity to Fulfill the Mission Examples of Evidence
24
3 - Student Learning and3 - Student Learning andEffective TeachingEffective Teaching
The organization provides evidence of student learning and teaching
effectiveness that demonstrates it is fulfilling its educational mission
25
3 - Student Learning and Effective Teaching[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Statements of Student Learning Outcomes That Make Effective Assessment Possible2 Organization Values and Supports Effective Teaching3 Organization Creates Effective Learning Environments4 Learning Resources Support Student Learning And Effective Teaching Examples of Evidence
26
4 - Acquisition Discovery amp4 - Acquisition Discovery ampApplication of KnowledgeApplication of Knowledge
The organization promotes a life of learning for its faculty administration
staff and students by fostering and supporting inquiry creativity practice and
social responsibility in ways consistent with its mission
27
4 - Acquisition Discovery andApplication of Knowledge
[Paraphrased]
1 Organization Demonstrates It Values a Life of Learning
2 Organization Demonstrates the Integral Nature of Knowledge and Skill Acquisition and Intellectual Inquiry3 Organization Assesses the Usefulness of Curricula to
Students Living and Working in a Global Diverse and Technological Society
4 Organization Support Responsible Acquisition Discovery and Application of Knowledge
Examples of Evidence
28
5 - Engagement and Service5 - Engagement and Service
As called for by its mission the organization identifies its constituencies
and serves them in ways both value
29
5 - Engagement and Service[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Organization Learns from Constituencies and Analyzes its Capacity to Serve Them2 Organizational Capacity and Commitment to Engage with Identified Constituencies and Communities3 Organization Demonstrates Responsiveness to Constituencies that Depend on It4 Internal and External Constituencies Value the Organizationrsquos Services Examples of Evidence
30
Cross-cutting Themes
Future-oriented
Learning-focused
Connected
Distinctive
31
Position Statements
Assessment of Student Learning
Diversity
General Education
32
Aligning an Institutionrsquos Mission and Outcomes with the Commissionrsquos
Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
33
The Decennial Cycle of Review
10-Year Window
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
12
Northern Arizona Universityrsquo ldquoGoalsrdquo
Provide Undergraduate Education Excellence in a Residential Learning Community
Strengthen graduate education economic development and research
Increase Enrollment and Retention Provide Leadership in the Development
Use and Assessment of Technologies in Administrative Systems and Educational Programs
13
Northern Arizona Universityrsquo ldquoGoalsrdquo
Foster a Culture of Diversity Community and Citizenship
Become the Nationrsquos Leading University Serving Native Americans
Ensure Financial Stability and Growth
14
Todayrsquos Agenda Focus Accreditation and Other Matters The Higher Learning Commissionrsquos
Expectations Regarding Self-Study Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Interests
Prospective Character of the Self-Study and Review Institutional Capacity Strategies for Engaging the Campus Community
15
Prospective Character of the Self-Study and Review
Institutional Self-Study and Self-Reflection
Institutionrsquos Mission Values and Goals
Evaluation of the Whole Organization
Engage Multiple Constituencies
Build on Institutional Processes
Effective Leadership and Communication
Evidence of Fulfilling the Criteria for Accreditation
Production of a Self-Study Report
Use of Self-Study Findings to Inform Decision-making and Future Institutional Development
Hallmarks of an Effective Self-Study Process
16
Fundamental Shifts
Inputs
Teaching
Focus on Past
Autonomy
Outcomes
Learning
Focus on Future
Connectedness
17
Topical Areas of the Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
18
Two Evaluation Processes for Continued Accreditation
Institutional Self-Study
Peer Review Decision-making
Processes Continued
Accreditation --Ten-year Cycle
Self-Assessment Strategy Forum Action Projects Annual Updates Systems Appraisal Continued Accreditation
--Seven-Year Cycle
19
Criterion Structure
Criterion Statement
Core Components
Examplesof Evidence
20
1 - Mission amp Integrity1 - Mission amp Integrity
The organization operates with integrity to ensure the fulfillment of its mission
through structures and processes that involve the board administration faculty
staff and students
21
1 - Mission and Integrity
[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Articulation of the Mission2 Recognition of Diversity among Learners other Constituencies and Greater Society 3 Organizational Understanding of Mission4 Mission Supported through Organizational Structures5 Organizational Protection of the Mission Examples of Evidence
22
2 - Preparing for the Future2 - Preparing for the Future
The organizationrsquos allocation of resources and its processes for evaluation and
planning demonstrate its capacity to fulfill its mission improve the quality of its
education and respond to future challenges and opportunities
23
2 - Preparing for the Future[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Realistic Preparation for a Future Shaped by Societal and Economic Trends2 Resource Support for Maintaining and Strengthening Educational Programs3 Evaluation and Assessment Processes Show Effectiveness and Continuous Improvement4 Planning Levels Align with Mission and Capacity to Fulfill the Mission Examples of Evidence
24
3 - Student Learning and3 - Student Learning andEffective TeachingEffective Teaching
The organization provides evidence of student learning and teaching
effectiveness that demonstrates it is fulfilling its educational mission
25
3 - Student Learning and Effective Teaching[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Statements of Student Learning Outcomes That Make Effective Assessment Possible2 Organization Values and Supports Effective Teaching3 Organization Creates Effective Learning Environments4 Learning Resources Support Student Learning And Effective Teaching Examples of Evidence
26
4 - Acquisition Discovery amp4 - Acquisition Discovery ampApplication of KnowledgeApplication of Knowledge
The organization promotes a life of learning for its faculty administration
staff and students by fostering and supporting inquiry creativity practice and
social responsibility in ways consistent with its mission
27
4 - Acquisition Discovery andApplication of Knowledge
[Paraphrased]
1 Organization Demonstrates It Values a Life of Learning
2 Organization Demonstrates the Integral Nature of Knowledge and Skill Acquisition and Intellectual Inquiry3 Organization Assesses the Usefulness of Curricula to
Students Living and Working in a Global Diverse and Technological Society
4 Organization Support Responsible Acquisition Discovery and Application of Knowledge
Examples of Evidence
28
5 - Engagement and Service5 - Engagement and Service
As called for by its mission the organization identifies its constituencies
and serves them in ways both value
29
5 - Engagement and Service[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Organization Learns from Constituencies and Analyzes its Capacity to Serve Them2 Organizational Capacity and Commitment to Engage with Identified Constituencies and Communities3 Organization Demonstrates Responsiveness to Constituencies that Depend on It4 Internal and External Constituencies Value the Organizationrsquos Services Examples of Evidence
30
Cross-cutting Themes
Future-oriented
Learning-focused
Connected
Distinctive
31
Position Statements
Assessment of Student Learning
Diversity
General Education
32
Aligning an Institutionrsquos Mission and Outcomes with the Commissionrsquos
Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
33
The Decennial Cycle of Review
10-Year Window
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
13
Northern Arizona Universityrsquo ldquoGoalsrdquo
Foster a Culture of Diversity Community and Citizenship
Become the Nationrsquos Leading University Serving Native Americans
Ensure Financial Stability and Growth
14
Todayrsquos Agenda Focus Accreditation and Other Matters The Higher Learning Commissionrsquos
Expectations Regarding Self-Study Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Interests
Prospective Character of the Self-Study and Review Institutional Capacity Strategies for Engaging the Campus Community
15
Prospective Character of the Self-Study and Review
Institutional Self-Study and Self-Reflection
Institutionrsquos Mission Values and Goals
Evaluation of the Whole Organization
Engage Multiple Constituencies
Build on Institutional Processes
Effective Leadership and Communication
Evidence of Fulfilling the Criteria for Accreditation
Production of a Self-Study Report
Use of Self-Study Findings to Inform Decision-making and Future Institutional Development
Hallmarks of an Effective Self-Study Process
16
Fundamental Shifts
Inputs
Teaching
Focus on Past
Autonomy
Outcomes
Learning
Focus on Future
Connectedness
17
Topical Areas of the Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
18
Two Evaluation Processes for Continued Accreditation
Institutional Self-Study
Peer Review Decision-making
Processes Continued
Accreditation --Ten-year Cycle
Self-Assessment Strategy Forum Action Projects Annual Updates Systems Appraisal Continued Accreditation
--Seven-Year Cycle
19
Criterion Structure
Criterion Statement
Core Components
Examplesof Evidence
20
1 - Mission amp Integrity1 - Mission amp Integrity
The organization operates with integrity to ensure the fulfillment of its mission
through structures and processes that involve the board administration faculty
staff and students
21
1 - Mission and Integrity
[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Articulation of the Mission2 Recognition of Diversity among Learners other Constituencies and Greater Society 3 Organizational Understanding of Mission4 Mission Supported through Organizational Structures5 Organizational Protection of the Mission Examples of Evidence
22
2 - Preparing for the Future2 - Preparing for the Future
The organizationrsquos allocation of resources and its processes for evaluation and
planning demonstrate its capacity to fulfill its mission improve the quality of its
education and respond to future challenges and opportunities
23
2 - Preparing for the Future[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Realistic Preparation for a Future Shaped by Societal and Economic Trends2 Resource Support for Maintaining and Strengthening Educational Programs3 Evaluation and Assessment Processes Show Effectiveness and Continuous Improvement4 Planning Levels Align with Mission and Capacity to Fulfill the Mission Examples of Evidence
24
3 - Student Learning and3 - Student Learning andEffective TeachingEffective Teaching
The organization provides evidence of student learning and teaching
effectiveness that demonstrates it is fulfilling its educational mission
25
3 - Student Learning and Effective Teaching[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Statements of Student Learning Outcomes That Make Effective Assessment Possible2 Organization Values and Supports Effective Teaching3 Organization Creates Effective Learning Environments4 Learning Resources Support Student Learning And Effective Teaching Examples of Evidence
26
4 - Acquisition Discovery amp4 - Acquisition Discovery ampApplication of KnowledgeApplication of Knowledge
The organization promotes a life of learning for its faculty administration
staff and students by fostering and supporting inquiry creativity practice and
social responsibility in ways consistent with its mission
27
4 - Acquisition Discovery andApplication of Knowledge
[Paraphrased]
1 Organization Demonstrates It Values a Life of Learning
2 Organization Demonstrates the Integral Nature of Knowledge and Skill Acquisition and Intellectual Inquiry3 Organization Assesses the Usefulness of Curricula to
Students Living and Working in a Global Diverse and Technological Society
4 Organization Support Responsible Acquisition Discovery and Application of Knowledge
Examples of Evidence
28
5 - Engagement and Service5 - Engagement and Service
As called for by its mission the organization identifies its constituencies
and serves them in ways both value
29
5 - Engagement and Service[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Organization Learns from Constituencies and Analyzes its Capacity to Serve Them2 Organizational Capacity and Commitment to Engage with Identified Constituencies and Communities3 Organization Demonstrates Responsiveness to Constituencies that Depend on It4 Internal and External Constituencies Value the Organizationrsquos Services Examples of Evidence
30
Cross-cutting Themes
Future-oriented
Learning-focused
Connected
Distinctive
31
Position Statements
Assessment of Student Learning
Diversity
General Education
32
Aligning an Institutionrsquos Mission and Outcomes with the Commissionrsquos
Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
33
The Decennial Cycle of Review
10-Year Window
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
14
Todayrsquos Agenda Focus Accreditation and Other Matters The Higher Learning Commissionrsquos
Expectations Regarding Self-Study Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Interests
Prospective Character of the Self-Study and Review Institutional Capacity Strategies for Engaging the Campus Community
15
Prospective Character of the Self-Study and Review
Institutional Self-Study and Self-Reflection
Institutionrsquos Mission Values and Goals
Evaluation of the Whole Organization
Engage Multiple Constituencies
Build on Institutional Processes
Effective Leadership and Communication
Evidence of Fulfilling the Criteria for Accreditation
Production of a Self-Study Report
Use of Self-Study Findings to Inform Decision-making and Future Institutional Development
Hallmarks of an Effective Self-Study Process
16
Fundamental Shifts
Inputs
Teaching
Focus on Past
Autonomy
Outcomes
Learning
Focus on Future
Connectedness
17
Topical Areas of the Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
18
Two Evaluation Processes for Continued Accreditation
Institutional Self-Study
Peer Review Decision-making
Processes Continued
Accreditation --Ten-year Cycle
Self-Assessment Strategy Forum Action Projects Annual Updates Systems Appraisal Continued Accreditation
--Seven-Year Cycle
19
Criterion Structure
Criterion Statement
Core Components
Examplesof Evidence
20
1 - Mission amp Integrity1 - Mission amp Integrity
The organization operates with integrity to ensure the fulfillment of its mission
through structures and processes that involve the board administration faculty
staff and students
21
1 - Mission and Integrity
[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Articulation of the Mission2 Recognition of Diversity among Learners other Constituencies and Greater Society 3 Organizational Understanding of Mission4 Mission Supported through Organizational Structures5 Organizational Protection of the Mission Examples of Evidence
22
2 - Preparing for the Future2 - Preparing for the Future
The organizationrsquos allocation of resources and its processes for evaluation and
planning demonstrate its capacity to fulfill its mission improve the quality of its
education and respond to future challenges and opportunities
23
2 - Preparing for the Future[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Realistic Preparation for a Future Shaped by Societal and Economic Trends2 Resource Support for Maintaining and Strengthening Educational Programs3 Evaluation and Assessment Processes Show Effectiveness and Continuous Improvement4 Planning Levels Align with Mission and Capacity to Fulfill the Mission Examples of Evidence
24
3 - Student Learning and3 - Student Learning andEffective TeachingEffective Teaching
The organization provides evidence of student learning and teaching
effectiveness that demonstrates it is fulfilling its educational mission
25
3 - Student Learning and Effective Teaching[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Statements of Student Learning Outcomes That Make Effective Assessment Possible2 Organization Values and Supports Effective Teaching3 Organization Creates Effective Learning Environments4 Learning Resources Support Student Learning And Effective Teaching Examples of Evidence
26
4 - Acquisition Discovery amp4 - Acquisition Discovery ampApplication of KnowledgeApplication of Knowledge
The organization promotes a life of learning for its faculty administration
staff and students by fostering and supporting inquiry creativity practice and
social responsibility in ways consistent with its mission
27
4 - Acquisition Discovery andApplication of Knowledge
[Paraphrased]
1 Organization Demonstrates It Values a Life of Learning
2 Organization Demonstrates the Integral Nature of Knowledge and Skill Acquisition and Intellectual Inquiry3 Organization Assesses the Usefulness of Curricula to
Students Living and Working in a Global Diverse and Technological Society
4 Organization Support Responsible Acquisition Discovery and Application of Knowledge
Examples of Evidence
28
5 - Engagement and Service5 - Engagement and Service
As called for by its mission the organization identifies its constituencies
and serves them in ways both value
29
5 - Engagement and Service[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Organization Learns from Constituencies and Analyzes its Capacity to Serve Them2 Organizational Capacity and Commitment to Engage with Identified Constituencies and Communities3 Organization Demonstrates Responsiveness to Constituencies that Depend on It4 Internal and External Constituencies Value the Organizationrsquos Services Examples of Evidence
30
Cross-cutting Themes
Future-oriented
Learning-focused
Connected
Distinctive
31
Position Statements
Assessment of Student Learning
Diversity
General Education
32
Aligning an Institutionrsquos Mission and Outcomes with the Commissionrsquos
Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
33
The Decennial Cycle of Review
10-Year Window
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
15
Prospective Character of the Self-Study and Review
Institutional Self-Study and Self-Reflection
Institutionrsquos Mission Values and Goals
Evaluation of the Whole Organization
Engage Multiple Constituencies
Build on Institutional Processes
Effective Leadership and Communication
Evidence of Fulfilling the Criteria for Accreditation
Production of a Self-Study Report
Use of Self-Study Findings to Inform Decision-making and Future Institutional Development
Hallmarks of an Effective Self-Study Process
16
Fundamental Shifts
Inputs
Teaching
Focus on Past
Autonomy
Outcomes
Learning
Focus on Future
Connectedness
17
Topical Areas of the Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
18
Two Evaluation Processes for Continued Accreditation
Institutional Self-Study
Peer Review Decision-making
Processes Continued
Accreditation --Ten-year Cycle
Self-Assessment Strategy Forum Action Projects Annual Updates Systems Appraisal Continued Accreditation
--Seven-Year Cycle
19
Criterion Structure
Criterion Statement
Core Components
Examplesof Evidence
20
1 - Mission amp Integrity1 - Mission amp Integrity
The organization operates with integrity to ensure the fulfillment of its mission
through structures and processes that involve the board administration faculty
staff and students
21
1 - Mission and Integrity
[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Articulation of the Mission2 Recognition of Diversity among Learners other Constituencies and Greater Society 3 Organizational Understanding of Mission4 Mission Supported through Organizational Structures5 Organizational Protection of the Mission Examples of Evidence
22
2 - Preparing for the Future2 - Preparing for the Future
The organizationrsquos allocation of resources and its processes for evaluation and
planning demonstrate its capacity to fulfill its mission improve the quality of its
education and respond to future challenges and opportunities
23
2 - Preparing for the Future[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Realistic Preparation for a Future Shaped by Societal and Economic Trends2 Resource Support for Maintaining and Strengthening Educational Programs3 Evaluation and Assessment Processes Show Effectiveness and Continuous Improvement4 Planning Levels Align with Mission and Capacity to Fulfill the Mission Examples of Evidence
24
3 - Student Learning and3 - Student Learning andEffective TeachingEffective Teaching
The organization provides evidence of student learning and teaching
effectiveness that demonstrates it is fulfilling its educational mission
25
3 - Student Learning and Effective Teaching[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Statements of Student Learning Outcomes That Make Effective Assessment Possible2 Organization Values and Supports Effective Teaching3 Organization Creates Effective Learning Environments4 Learning Resources Support Student Learning And Effective Teaching Examples of Evidence
26
4 - Acquisition Discovery amp4 - Acquisition Discovery ampApplication of KnowledgeApplication of Knowledge
The organization promotes a life of learning for its faculty administration
staff and students by fostering and supporting inquiry creativity practice and
social responsibility in ways consistent with its mission
27
4 - Acquisition Discovery andApplication of Knowledge
[Paraphrased]
1 Organization Demonstrates It Values a Life of Learning
2 Organization Demonstrates the Integral Nature of Knowledge and Skill Acquisition and Intellectual Inquiry3 Organization Assesses the Usefulness of Curricula to
Students Living and Working in a Global Diverse and Technological Society
4 Organization Support Responsible Acquisition Discovery and Application of Knowledge
Examples of Evidence
28
5 - Engagement and Service5 - Engagement and Service
As called for by its mission the organization identifies its constituencies
and serves them in ways both value
29
5 - Engagement and Service[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Organization Learns from Constituencies and Analyzes its Capacity to Serve Them2 Organizational Capacity and Commitment to Engage with Identified Constituencies and Communities3 Organization Demonstrates Responsiveness to Constituencies that Depend on It4 Internal and External Constituencies Value the Organizationrsquos Services Examples of Evidence
30
Cross-cutting Themes
Future-oriented
Learning-focused
Connected
Distinctive
31
Position Statements
Assessment of Student Learning
Diversity
General Education
32
Aligning an Institutionrsquos Mission and Outcomes with the Commissionrsquos
Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
33
The Decennial Cycle of Review
10-Year Window
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
16
Fundamental Shifts
Inputs
Teaching
Focus on Past
Autonomy
Outcomes
Learning
Focus on Future
Connectedness
17
Topical Areas of the Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
18
Two Evaluation Processes for Continued Accreditation
Institutional Self-Study
Peer Review Decision-making
Processes Continued
Accreditation --Ten-year Cycle
Self-Assessment Strategy Forum Action Projects Annual Updates Systems Appraisal Continued Accreditation
--Seven-Year Cycle
19
Criterion Structure
Criterion Statement
Core Components
Examplesof Evidence
20
1 - Mission amp Integrity1 - Mission amp Integrity
The organization operates with integrity to ensure the fulfillment of its mission
through structures and processes that involve the board administration faculty
staff and students
21
1 - Mission and Integrity
[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Articulation of the Mission2 Recognition of Diversity among Learners other Constituencies and Greater Society 3 Organizational Understanding of Mission4 Mission Supported through Organizational Structures5 Organizational Protection of the Mission Examples of Evidence
22
2 - Preparing for the Future2 - Preparing for the Future
The organizationrsquos allocation of resources and its processes for evaluation and
planning demonstrate its capacity to fulfill its mission improve the quality of its
education and respond to future challenges and opportunities
23
2 - Preparing for the Future[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Realistic Preparation for a Future Shaped by Societal and Economic Trends2 Resource Support for Maintaining and Strengthening Educational Programs3 Evaluation and Assessment Processes Show Effectiveness and Continuous Improvement4 Planning Levels Align with Mission and Capacity to Fulfill the Mission Examples of Evidence
24
3 - Student Learning and3 - Student Learning andEffective TeachingEffective Teaching
The organization provides evidence of student learning and teaching
effectiveness that demonstrates it is fulfilling its educational mission
25
3 - Student Learning and Effective Teaching[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Statements of Student Learning Outcomes That Make Effective Assessment Possible2 Organization Values and Supports Effective Teaching3 Organization Creates Effective Learning Environments4 Learning Resources Support Student Learning And Effective Teaching Examples of Evidence
26
4 - Acquisition Discovery amp4 - Acquisition Discovery ampApplication of KnowledgeApplication of Knowledge
The organization promotes a life of learning for its faculty administration
staff and students by fostering and supporting inquiry creativity practice and
social responsibility in ways consistent with its mission
27
4 - Acquisition Discovery andApplication of Knowledge
[Paraphrased]
1 Organization Demonstrates It Values a Life of Learning
2 Organization Demonstrates the Integral Nature of Knowledge and Skill Acquisition and Intellectual Inquiry3 Organization Assesses the Usefulness of Curricula to
Students Living and Working in a Global Diverse and Technological Society
4 Organization Support Responsible Acquisition Discovery and Application of Knowledge
Examples of Evidence
28
5 - Engagement and Service5 - Engagement and Service
As called for by its mission the organization identifies its constituencies
and serves them in ways both value
29
5 - Engagement and Service[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Organization Learns from Constituencies and Analyzes its Capacity to Serve Them2 Organizational Capacity and Commitment to Engage with Identified Constituencies and Communities3 Organization Demonstrates Responsiveness to Constituencies that Depend on It4 Internal and External Constituencies Value the Organizationrsquos Services Examples of Evidence
30
Cross-cutting Themes
Future-oriented
Learning-focused
Connected
Distinctive
31
Position Statements
Assessment of Student Learning
Diversity
General Education
32
Aligning an Institutionrsquos Mission and Outcomes with the Commissionrsquos
Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
33
The Decennial Cycle of Review
10-Year Window
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
17
Topical Areas of the Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
18
Two Evaluation Processes for Continued Accreditation
Institutional Self-Study
Peer Review Decision-making
Processes Continued
Accreditation --Ten-year Cycle
Self-Assessment Strategy Forum Action Projects Annual Updates Systems Appraisal Continued Accreditation
--Seven-Year Cycle
19
Criterion Structure
Criterion Statement
Core Components
Examplesof Evidence
20
1 - Mission amp Integrity1 - Mission amp Integrity
The organization operates with integrity to ensure the fulfillment of its mission
through structures and processes that involve the board administration faculty
staff and students
21
1 - Mission and Integrity
[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Articulation of the Mission2 Recognition of Diversity among Learners other Constituencies and Greater Society 3 Organizational Understanding of Mission4 Mission Supported through Organizational Structures5 Organizational Protection of the Mission Examples of Evidence
22
2 - Preparing for the Future2 - Preparing for the Future
The organizationrsquos allocation of resources and its processes for evaluation and
planning demonstrate its capacity to fulfill its mission improve the quality of its
education and respond to future challenges and opportunities
23
2 - Preparing for the Future[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Realistic Preparation for a Future Shaped by Societal and Economic Trends2 Resource Support for Maintaining and Strengthening Educational Programs3 Evaluation and Assessment Processes Show Effectiveness and Continuous Improvement4 Planning Levels Align with Mission and Capacity to Fulfill the Mission Examples of Evidence
24
3 - Student Learning and3 - Student Learning andEffective TeachingEffective Teaching
The organization provides evidence of student learning and teaching
effectiveness that demonstrates it is fulfilling its educational mission
25
3 - Student Learning and Effective Teaching[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Statements of Student Learning Outcomes That Make Effective Assessment Possible2 Organization Values and Supports Effective Teaching3 Organization Creates Effective Learning Environments4 Learning Resources Support Student Learning And Effective Teaching Examples of Evidence
26
4 - Acquisition Discovery amp4 - Acquisition Discovery ampApplication of KnowledgeApplication of Knowledge
The organization promotes a life of learning for its faculty administration
staff and students by fostering and supporting inquiry creativity practice and
social responsibility in ways consistent with its mission
27
4 - Acquisition Discovery andApplication of Knowledge
[Paraphrased]
1 Organization Demonstrates It Values a Life of Learning
2 Organization Demonstrates the Integral Nature of Knowledge and Skill Acquisition and Intellectual Inquiry3 Organization Assesses the Usefulness of Curricula to
Students Living and Working in a Global Diverse and Technological Society
4 Organization Support Responsible Acquisition Discovery and Application of Knowledge
Examples of Evidence
28
5 - Engagement and Service5 - Engagement and Service
As called for by its mission the organization identifies its constituencies
and serves them in ways both value
29
5 - Engagement and Service[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Organization Learns from Constituencies and Analyzes its Capacity to Serve Them2 Organizational Capacity and Commitment to Engage with Identified Constituencies and Communities3 Organization Demonstrates Responsiveness to Constituencies that Depend on It4 Internal and External Constituencies Value the Organizationrsquos Services Examples of Evidence
30
Cross-cutting Themes
Future-oriented
Learning-focused
Connected
Distinctive
31
Position Statements
Assessment of Student Learning
Diversity
General Education
32
Aligning an Institutionrsquos Mission and Outcomes with the Commissionrsquos
Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
33
The Decennial Cycle of Review
10-Year Window
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
18
Two Evaluation Processes for Continued Accreditation
Institutional Self-Study
Peer Review Decision-making
Processes Continued
Accreditation --Ten-year Cycle
Self-Assessment Strategy Forum Action Projects Annual Updates Systems Appraisal Continued Accreditation
--Seven-Year Cycle
19
Criterion Structure
Criterion Statement
Core Components
Examplesof Evidence
20
1 - Mission amp Integrity1 - Mission amp Integrity
The organization operates with integrity to ensure the fulfillment of its mission
through structures and processes that involve the board administration faculty
staff and students
21
1 - Mission and Integrity
[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Articulation of the Mission2 Recognition of Diversity among Learners other Constituencies and Greater Society 3 Organizational Understanding of Mission4 Mission Supported through Organizational Structures5 Organizational Protection of the Mission Examples of Evidence
22
2 - Preparing for the Future2 - Preparing for the Future
The organizationrsquos allocation of resources and its processes for evaluation and
planning demonstrate its capacity to fulfill its mission improve the quality of its
education and respond to future challenges and opportunities
23
2 - Preparing for the Future[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Realistic Preparation for a Future Shaped by Societal and Economic Trends2 Resource Support for Maintaining and Strengthening Educational Programs3 Evaluation and Assessment Processes Show Effectiveness and Continuous Improvement4 Planning Levels Align with Mission and Capacity to Fulfill the Mission Examples of Evidence
24
3 - Student Learning and3 - Student Learning andEffective TeachingEffective Teaching
The organization provides evidence of student learning and teaching
effectiveness that demonstrates it is fulfilling its educational mission
25
3 - Student Learning and Effective Teaching[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Statements of Student Learning Outcomes That Make Effective Assessment Possible2 Organization Values and Supports Effective Teaching3 Organization Creates Effective Learning Environments4 Learning Resources Support Student Learning And Effective Teaching Examples of Evidence
26
4 - Acquisition Discovery amp4 - Acquisition Discovery ampApplication of KnowledgeApplication of Knowledge
The organization promotes a life of learning for its faculty administration
staff and students by fostering and supporting inquiry creativity practice and
social responsibility in ways consistent with its mission
27
4 - Acquisition Discovery andApplication of Knowledge
[Paraphrased]
1 Organization Demonstrates It Values a Life of Learning
2 Organization Demonstrates the Integral Nature of Knowledge and Skill Acquisition and Intellectual Inquiry3 Organization Assesses the Usefulness of Curricula to
Students Living and Working in a Global Diverse and Technological Society
4 Organization Support Responsible Acquisition Discovery and Application of Knowledge
Examples of Evidence
28
5 - Engagement and Service5 - Engagement and Service
As called for by its mission the organization identifies its constituencies
and serves them in ways both value
29
5 - Engagement and Service[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Organization Learns from Constituencies and Analyzes its Capacity to Serve Them2 Organizational Capacity and Commitment to Engage with Identified Constituencies and Communities3 Organization Demonstrates Responsiveness to Constituencies that Depend on It4 Internal and External Constituencies Value the Organizationrsquos Services Examples of Evidence
30
Cross-cutting Themes
Future-oriented
Learning-focused
Connected
Distinctive
31
Position Statements
Assessment of Student Learning
Diversity
General Education
32
Aligning an Institutionrsquos Mission and Outcomes with the Commissionrsquos
Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
33
The Decennial Cycle of Review
10-Year Window
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
19
Criterion Structure
Criterion Statement
Core Components
Examplesof Evidence
20
1 - Mission amp Integrity1 - Mission amp Integrity
The organization operates with integrity to ensure the fulfillment of its mission
through structures and processes that involve the board administration faculty
staff and students
21
1 - Mission and Integrity
[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Articulation of the Mission2 Recognition of Diversity among Learners other Constituencies and Greater Society 3 Organizational Understanding of Mission4 Mission Supported through Organizational Structures5 Organizational Protection of the Mission Examples of Evidence
22
2 - Preparing for the Future2 - Preparing for the Future
The organizationrsquos allocation of resources and its processes for evaluation and
planning demonstrate its capacity to fulfill its mission improve the quality of its
education and respond to future challenges and opportunities
23
2 - Preparing for the Future[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Realistic Preparation for a Future Shaped by Societal and Economic Trends2 Resource Support for Maintaining and Strengthening Educational Programs3 Evaluation and Assessment Processes Show Effectiveness and Continuous Improvement4 Planning Levels Align with Mission and Capacity to Fulfill the Mission Examples of Evidence
24
3 - Student Learning and3 - Student Learning andEffective TeachingEffective Teaching
The organization provides evidence of student learning and teaching
effectiveness that demonstrates it is fulfilling its educational mission
25
3 - Student Learning and Effective Teaching[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Statements of Student Learning Outcomes That Make Effective Assessment Possible2 Organization Values and Supports Effective Teaching3 Organization Creates Effective Learning Environments4 Learning Resources Support Student Learning And Effective Teaching Examples of Evidence
26
4 - Acquisition Discovery amp4 - Acquisition Discovery ampApplication of KnowledgeApplication of Knowledge
The organization promotes a life of learning for its faculty administration
staff and students by fostering and supporting inquiry creativity practice and
social responsibility in ways consistent with its mission
27
4 - Acquisition Discovery andApplication of Knowledge
[Paraphrased]
1 Organization Demonstrates It Values a Life of Learning
2 Organization Demonstrates the Integral Nature of Knowledge and Skill Acquisition and Intellectual Inquiry3 Organization Assesses the Usefulness of Curricula to
Students Living and Working in a Global Diverse and Technological Society
4 Organization Support Responsible Acquisition Discovery and Application of Knowledge
Examples of Evidence
28
5 - Engagement and Service5 - Engagement and Service
As called for by its mission the organization identifies its constituencies
and serves them in ways both value
29
5 - Engagement and Service[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Organization Learns from Constituencies and Analyzes its Capacity to Serve Them2 Organizational Capacity and Commitment to Engage with Identified Constituencies and Communities3 Organization Demonstrates Responsiveness to Constituencies that Depend on It4 Internal and External Constituencies Value the Organizationrsquos Services Examples of Evidence
30
Cross-cutting Themes
Future-oriented
Learning-focused
Connected
Distinctive
31
Position Statements
Assessment of Student Learning
Diversity
General Education
32
Aligning an Institutionrsquos Mission and Outcomes with the Commissionrsquos
Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
33
The Decennial Cycle of Review
10-Year Window
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
20
1 - Mission amp Integrity1 - Mission amp Integrity
The organization operates with integrity to ensure the fulfillment of its mission
through structures and processes that involve the board administration faculty
staff and students
21
1 - Mission and Integrity
[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Articulation of the Mission2 Recognition of Diversity among Learners other Constituencies and Greater Society 3 Organizational Understanding of Mission4 Mission Supported through Organizational Structures5 Organizational Protection of the Mission Examples of Evidence
22
2 - Preparing for the Future2 - Preparing for the Future
The organizationrsquos allocation of resources and its processes for evaluation and
planning demonstrate its capacity to fulfill its mission improve the quality of its
education and respond to future challenges and opportunities
23
2 - Preparing for the Future[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Realistic Preparation for a Future Shaped by Societal and Economic Trends2 Resource Support for Maintaining and Strengthening Educational Programs3 Evaluation and Assessment Processes Show Effectiveness and Continuous Improvement4 Planning Levels Align with Mission and Capacity to Fulfill the Mission Examples of Evidence
24
3 - Student Learning and3 - Student Learning andEffective TeachingEffective Teaching
The organization provides evidence of student learning and teaching
effectiveness that demonstrates it is fulfilling its educational mission
25
3 - Student Learning and Effective Teaching[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Statements of Student Learning Outcomes That Make Effective Assessment Possible2 Organization Values and Supports Effective Teaching3 Organization Creates Effective Learning Environments4 Learning Resources Support Student Learning And Effective Teaching Examples of Evidence
26
4 - Acquisition Discovery amp4 - Acquisition Discovery ampApplication of KnowledgeApplication of Knowledge
The organization promotes a life of learning for its faculty administration
staff and students by fostering and supporting inquiry creativity practice and
social responsibility in ways consistent with its mission
27
4 - Acquisition Discovery andApplication of Knowledge
[Paraphrased]
1 Organization Demonstrates It Values a Life of Learning
2 Organization Demonstrates the Integral Nature of Knowledge and Skill Acquisition and Intellectual Inquiry3 Organization Assesses the Usefulness of Curricula to
Students Living and Working in a Global Diverse and Technological Society
4 Organization Support Responsible Acquisition Discovery and Application of Knowledge
Examples of Evidence
28
5 - Engagement and Service5 - Engagement and Service
As called for by its mission the organization identifies its constituencies
and serves them in ways both value
29
5 - Engagement and Service[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Organization Learns from Constituencies and Analyzes its Capacity to Serve Them2 Organizational Capacity and Commitment to Engage with Identified Constituencies and Communities3 Organization Demonstrates Responsiveness to Constituencies that Depend on It4 Internal and External Constituencies Value the Organizationrsquos Services Examples of Evidence
30
Cross-cutting Themes
Future-oriented
Learning-focused
Connected
Distinctive
31
Position Statements
Assessment of Student Learning
Diversity
General Education
32
Aligning an Institutionrsquos Mission and Outcomes with the Commissionrsquos
Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
33
The Decennial Cycle of Review
10-Year Window
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
21
1 - Mission and Integrity
[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Articulation of the Mission2 Recognition of Diversity among Learners other Constituencies and Greater Society 3 Organizational Understanding of Mission4 Mission Supported through Organizational Structures5 Organizational Protection of the Mission Examples of Evidence
22
2 - Preparing for the Future2 - Preparing for the Future
The organizationrsquos allocation of resources and its processes for evaluation and
planning demonstrate its capacity to fulfill its mission improve the quality of its
education and respond to future challenges and opportunities
23
2 - Preparing for the Future[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Realistic Preparation for a Future Shaped by Societal and Economic Trends2 Resource Support for Maintaining and Strengthening Educational Programs3 Evaluation and Assessment Processes Show Effectiveness and Continuous Improvement4 Planning Levels Align with Mission and Capacity to Fulfill the Mission Examples of Evidence
24
3 - Student Learning and3 - Student Learning andEffective TeachingEffective Teaching
The organization provides evidence of student learning and teaching
effectiveness that demonstrates it is fulfilling its educational mission
25
3 - Student Learning and Effective Teaching[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Statements of Student Learning Outcomes That Make Effective Assessment Possible2 Organization Values and Supports Effective Teaching3 Organization Creates Effective Learning Environments4 Learning Resources Support Student Learning And Effective Teaching Examples of Evidence
26
4 - Acquisition Discovery amp4 - Acquisition Discovery ampApplication of KnowledgeApplication of Knowledge
The organization promotes a life of learning for its faculty administration
staff and students by fostering and supporting inquiry creativity practice and
social responsibility in ways consistent with its mission
27
4 - Acquisition Discovery andApplication of Knowledge
[Paraphrased]
1 Organization Demonstrates It Values a Life of Learning
2 Organization Demonstrates the Integral Nature of Knowledge and Skill Acquisition and Intellectual Inquiry3 Organization Assesses the Usefulness of Curricula to
Students Living and Working in a Global Diverse and Technological Society
4 Organization Support Responsible Acquisition Discovery and Application of Knowledge
Examples of Evidence
28
5 - Engagement and Service5 - Engagement and Service
As called for by its mission the organization identifies its constituencies
and serves them in ways both value
29
5 - Engagement and Service[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Organization Learns from Constituencies and Analyzes its Capacity to Serve Them2 Organizational Capacity and Commitment to Engage with Identified Constituencies and Communities3 Organization Demonstrates Responsiveness to Constituencies that Depend on It4 Internal and External Constituencies Value the Organizationrsquos Services Examples of Evidence
30
Cross-cutting Themes
Future-oriented
Learning-focused
Connected
Distinctive
31
Position Statements
Assessment of Student Learning
Diversity
General Education
32
Aligning an Institutionrsquos Mission and Outcomes with the Commissionrsquos
Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
33
The Decennial Cycle of Review
10-Year Window
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
22
2 - Preparing for the Future2 - Preparing for the Future
The organizationrsquos allocation of resources and its processes for evaluation and
planning demonstrate its capacity to fulfill its mission improve the quality of its
education and respond to future challenges and opportunities
23
2 - Preparing for the Future[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Realistic Preparation for a Future Shaped by Societal and Economic Trends2 Resource Support for Maintaining and Strengthening Educational Programs3 Evaluation and Assessment Processes Show Effectiveness and Continuous Improvement4 Planning Levels Align with Mission and Capacity to Fulfill the Mission Examples of Evidence
24
3 - Student Learning and3 - Student Learning andEffective TeachingEffective Teaching
The organization provides evidence of student learning and teaching
effectiveness that demonstrates it is fulfilling its educational mission
25
3 - Student Learning and Effective Teaching[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Statements of Student Learning Outcomes That Make Effective Assessment Possible2 Organization Values and Supports Effective Teaching3 Organization Creates Effective Learning Environments4 Learning Resources Support Student Learning And Effective Teaching Examples of Evidence
26
4 - Acquisition Discovery amp4 - Acquisition Discovery ampApplication of KnowledgeApplication of Knowledge
The organization promotes a life of learning for its faculty administration
staff and students by fostering and supporting inquiry creativity practice and
social responsibility in ways consistent with its mission
27
4 - Acquisition Discovery andApplication of Knowledge
[Paraphrased]
1 Organization Demonstrates It Values a Life of Learning
2 Organization Demonstrates the Integral Nature of Knowledge and Skill Acquisition and Intellectual Inquiry3 Organization Assesses the Usefulness of Curricula to
Students Living and Working in a Global Diverse and Technological Society
4 Organization Support Responsible Acquisition Discovery and Application of Knowledge
Examples of Evidence
28
5 - Engagement and Service5 - Engagement and Service
As called for by its mission the organization identifies its constituencies
and serves them in ways both value
29
5 - Engagement and Service[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Organization Learns from Constituencies and Analyzes its Capacity to Serve Them2 Organizational Capacity and Commitment to Engage with Identified Constituencies and Communities3 Organization Demonstrates Responsiveness to Constituencies that Depend on It4 Internal and External Constituencies Value the Organizationrsquos Services Examples of Evidence
30
Cross-cutting Themes
Future-oriented
Learning-focused
Connected
Distinctive
31
Position Statements
Assessment of Student Learning
Diversity
General Education
32
Aligning an Institutionrsquos Mission and Outcomes with the Commissionrsquos
Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
33
The Decennial Cycle of Review
10-Year Window
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
23
2 - Preparing for the Future[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Realistic Preparation for a Future Shaped by Societal and Economic Trends2 Resource Support for Maintaining and Strengthening Educational Programs3 Evaluation and Assessment Processes Show Effectiveness and Continuous Improvement4 Planning Levels Align with Mission and Capacity to Fulfill the Mission Examples of Evidence
24
3 - Student Learning and3 - Student Learning andEffective TeachingEffective Teaching
The organization provides evidence of student learning and teaching
effectiveness that demonstrates it is fulfilling its educational mission
25
3 - Student Learning and Effective Teaching[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Statements of Student Learning Outcomes That Make Effective Assessment Possible2 Organization Values and Supports Effective Teaching3 Organization Creates Effective Learning Environments4 Learning Resources Support Student Learning And Effective Teaching Examples of Evidence
26
4 - Acquisition Discovery amp4 - Acquisition Discovery ampApplication of KnowledgeApplication of Knowledge
The organization promotes a life of learning for its faculty administration
staff and students by fostering and supporting inquiry creativity practice and
social responsibility in ways consistent with its mission
27
4 - Acquisition Discovery andApplication of Knowledge
[Paraphrased]
1 Organization Demonstrates It Values a Life of Learning
2 Organization Demonstrates the Integral Nature of Knowledge and Skill Acquisition and Intellectual Inquiry3 Organization Assesses the Usefulness of Curricula to
Students Living and Working in a Global Diverse and Technological Society
4 Organization Support Responsible Acquisition Discovery and Application of Knowledge
Examples of Evidence
28
5 - Engagement and Service5 - Engagement and Service
As called for by its mission the organization identifies its constituencies
and serves them in ways both value
29
5 - Engagement and Service[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Organization Learns from Constituencies and Analyzes its Capacity to Serve Them2 Organizational Capacity and Commitment to Engage with Identified Constituencies and Communities3 Organization Demonstrates Responsiveness to Constituencies that Depend on It4 Internal and External Constituencies Value the Organizationrsquos Services Examples of Evidence
30
Cross-cutting Themes
Future-oriented
Learning-focused
Connected
Distinctive
31
Position Statements
Assessment of Student Learning
Diversity
General Education
32
Aligning an Institutionrsquos Mission and Outcomes with the Commissionrsquos
Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
33
The Decennial Cycle of Review
10-Year Window
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
24
3 - Student Learning and3 - Student Learning andEffective TeachingEffective Teaching
The organization provides evidence of student learning and teaching
effectiveness that demonstrates it is fulfilling its educational mission
25
3 - Student Learning and Effective Teaching[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Statements of Student Learning Outcomes That Make Effective Assessment Possible2 Organization Values and Supports Effective Teaching3 Organization Creates Effective Learning Environments4 Learning Resources Support Student Learning And Effective Teaching Examples of Evidence
26
4 - Acquisition Discovery amp4 - Acquisition Discovery ampApplication of KnowledgeApplication of Knowledge
The organization promotes a life of learning for its faculty administration
staff and students by fostering and supporting inquiry creativity practice and
social responsibility in ways consistent with its mission
27
4 - Acquisition Discovery andApplication of Knowledge
[Paraphrased]
1 Organization Demonstrates It Values a Life of Learning
2 Organization Demonstrates the Integral Nature of Knowledge and Skill Acquisition and Intellectual Inquiry3 Organization Assesses the Usefulness of Curricula to
Students Living and Working in a Global Diverse and Technological Society
4 Organization Support Responsible Acquisition Discovery and Application of Knowledge
Examples of Evidence
28
5 - Engagement and Service5 - Engagement and Service
As called for by its mission the organization identifies its constituencies
and serves them in ways both value
29
5 - Engagement and Service[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Organization Learns from Constituencies and Analyzes its Capacity to Serve Them2 Organizational Capacity and Commitment to Engage with Identified Constituencies and Communities3 Organization Demonstrates Responsiveness to Constituencies that Depend on It4 Internal and External Constituencies Value the Organizationrsquos Services Examples of Evidence
30
Cross-cutting Themes
Future-oriented
Learning-focused
Connected
Distinctive
31
Position Statements
Assessment of Student Learning
Diversity
General Education
32
Aligning an Institutionrsquos Mission and Outcomes with the Commissionrsquos
Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
33
The Decennial Cycle of Review
10-Year Window
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
25
3 - Student Learning and Effective Teaching[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Clear Statements of Student Learning Outcomes That Make Effective Assessment Possible2 Organization Values and Supports Effective Teaching3 Organization Creates Effective Learning Environments4 Learning Resources Support Student Learning And Effective Teaching Examples of Evidence
26
4 - Acquisition Discovery amp4 - Acquisition Discovery ampApplication of KnowledgeApplication of Knowledge
The organization promotes a life of learning for its faculty administration
staff and students by fostering and supporting inquiry creativity practice and
social responsibility in ways consistent with its mission
27
4 - Acquisition Discovery andApplication of Knowledge
[Paraphrased]
1 Organization Demonstrates It Values a Life of Learning
2 Organization Demonstrates the Integral Nature of Knowledge and Skill Acquisition and Intellectual Inquiry3 Organization Assesses the Usefulness of Curricula to
Students Living and Working in a Global Diverse and Technological Society
4 Organization Support Responsible Acquisition Discovery and Application of Knowledge
Examples of Evidence
28
5 - Engagement and Service5 - Engagement and Service
As called for by its mission the organization identifies its constituencies
and serves them in ways both value
29
5 - Engagement and Service[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Organization Learns from Constituencies and Analyzes its Capacity to Serve Them2 Organizational Capacity and Commitment to Engage with Identified Constituencies and Communities3 Organization Demonstrates Responsiveness to Constituencies that Depend on It4 Internal and External Constituencies Value the Organizationrsquos Services Examples of Evidence
30
Cross-cutting Themes
Future-oriented
Learning-focused
Connected
Distinctive
31
Position Statements
Assessment of Student Learning
Diversity
General Education
32
Aligning an Institutionrsquos Mission and Outcomes with the Commissionrsquos
Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
33
The Decennial Cycle of Review
10-Year Window
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
26
4 - Acquisition Discovery amp4 - Acquisition Discovery ampApplication of KnowledgeApplication of Knowledge
The organization promotes a life of learning for its faculty administration
staff and students by fostering and supporting inquiry creativity practice and
social responsibility in ways consistent with its mission
27
4 - Acquisition Discovery andApplication of Knowledge
[Paraphrased]
1 Organization Demonstrates It Values a Life of Learning
2 Organization Demonstrates the Integral Nature of Knowledge and Skill Acquisition and Intellectual Inquiry3 Organization Assesses the Usefulness of Curricula to
Students Living and Working in a Global Diverse and Technological Society
4 Organization Support Responsible Acquisition Discovery and Application of Knowledge
Examples of Evidence
28
5 - Engagement and Service5 - Engagement and Service
As called for by its mission the organization identifies its constituencies
and serves them in ways both value
29
5 - Engagement and Service[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Organization Learns from Constituencies and Analyzes its Capacity to Serve Them2 Organizational Capacity and Commitment to Engage with Identified Constituencies and Communities3 Organization Demonstrates Responsiveness to Constituencies that Depend on It4 Internal and External Constituencies Value the Organizationrsquos Services Examples of Evidence
30
Cross-cutting Themes
Future-oriented
Learning-focused
Connected
Distinctive
31
Position Statements
Assessment of Student Learning
Diversity
General Education
32
Aligning an Institutionrsquos Mission and Outcomes with the Commissionrsquos
Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
33
The Decennial Cycle of Review
10-Year Window
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
27
4 - Acquisition Discovery andApplication of Knowledge
[Paraphrased]
1 Organization Demonstrates It Values a Life of Learning
2 Organization Demonstrates the Integral Nature of Knowledge and Skill Acquisition and Intellectual Inquiry3 Organization Assesses the Usefulness of Curricula to
Students Living and Working in a Global Diverse and Technological Society
4 Organization Support Responsible Acquisition Discovery and Application of Knowledge
Examples of Evidence
28
5 - Engagement and Service5 - Engagement and Service
As called for by its mission the organization identifies its constituencies
and serves them in ways both value
29
5 - Engagement and Service[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Organization Learns from Constituencies and Analyzes its Capacity to Serve Them2 Organizational Capacity and Commitment to Engage with Identified Constituencies and Communities3 Organization Demonstrates Responsiveness to Constituencies that Depend on It4 Internal and External Constituencies Value the Organizationrsquos Services Examples of Evidence
30
Cross-cutting Themes
Future-oriented
Learning-focused
Connected
Distinctive
31
Position Statements
Assessment of Student Learning
Diversity
General Education
32
Aligning an Institutionrsquos Mission and Outcomes with the Commissionrsquos
Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
33
The Decennial Cycle of Review
10-Year Window
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
28
5 - Engagement and Service5 - Engagement and Service
As called for by its mission the organization identifies its constituencies
and serves them in ways both value
29
5 - Engagement and Service[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Organization Learns from Constituencies and Analyzes its Capacity to Serve Them2 Organizational Capacity and Commitment to Engage with Identified Constituencies and Communities3 Organization Demonstrates Responsiveness to Constituencies that Depend on It4 Internal and External Constituencies Value the Organizationrsquos Services Examples of Evidence
30
Cross-cutting Themes
Future-oriented
Learning-focused
Connected
Distinctive
31
Position Statements
Assessment of Student Learning
Diversity
General Education
32
Aligning an Institutionrsquos Mission and Outcomes with the Commissionrsquos
Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
33
The Decennial Cycle of Review
10-Year Window
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
29
5 - Engagement and Service[Core Components - Paraphrased]
1 Organization Learns from Constituencies and Analyzes its Capacity to Serve Them2 Organizational Capacity and Commitment to Engage with Identified Constituencies and Communities3 Organization Demonstrates Responsiveness to Constituencies that Depend on It4 Internal and External Constituencies Value the Organizationrsquos Services Examples of Evidence
30
Cross-cutting Themes
Future-oriented
Learning-focused
Connected
Distinctive
31
Position Statements
Assessment of Student Learning
Diversity
General Education
32
Aligning an Institutionrsquos Mission and Outcomes with the Commissionrsquos
Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
33
The Decennial Cycle of Review
10-Year Window
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
30
Cross-cutting Themes
Future-oriented
Learning-focused
Connected
Distinctive
31
Position Statements
Assessment of Student Learning
Diversity
General Education
32
Aligning an Institutionrsquos Mission and Outcomes with the Commissionrsquos
Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
33
The Decennial Cycle of Review
10-Year Window
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
31
Position Statements
Assessment of Student Learning
Diversity
General Education
32
Aligning an Institutionrsquos Mission and Outcomes with the Commissionrsquos
Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
33
The Decennial Cycle of Review
10-Year Window
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
32
Aligning an Institutionrsquos Mission and Outcomes with the Commissionrsquos
Criteria for Accreditation
Mission and Integrity Preparing for the Future Student Learning and Effective Learning Acquisition Discovery and Application of
Knowledge Engagement and Service
ldquoHandbook of Accreditationrdquo - Chapter 3 wwwncahlcorg
33
The Decennial Cycle of Review
10-Year Window
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
33
The Decennial Cycle of Review
10-Year Window
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
34
Institutional Capacity Mission Values and
Goals Institutional
Autonomy Teaching Research
and Service (Engagement)
Educational Programs and Services
Resources Human Physical Financial and Technological
Constituencies Students Communities and Collaborators
Sites and Outreach Outcomes
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
35
Content of the Self-Study
Addressing the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation and their Related Core Components
Address ConcernsChallenges Identified by Previous Visiting Team or other Formal Reviews
Address Federal Compliance Issues Provide ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo Provide Supporting Materials [Paper and Electronic]
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
36
Team Identified Challenges Northern Arizona University
Assessment of Student Learning at the Undergraduate Level and in Off-Campus Programs
Coherency in General Education Strategic Planning [Measurable Goals Action Plans
Performance Measures Faculty Support Linkage of Planning and Budgeting]
Qualifications of Adjunct Faculty Culture of Diversity on the Flagstaff Campus
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
37
Federal Compliance Program
Credits Program Length and Tuition Compliance with the Higher Education
Reauthorization Act [Loan Default Rate]
Compliance Visits to Off-campus Locations Reference to the Commission in Advertising
and Recruitment Materials Institutional Records of Studentsrsquo Complaints
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
38
Institutional Snapshot
Student Demography Headcounts Student Recruitment and Admissions Financial Assistance for Students Student Retention and Program Productivity Faculty Demography Availability of Instructional Resources and
Information Technology Financial Data
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
39
Think Holistically about Your Organization
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
40
Student Learning Central to Determining
Institutional Effectiveness
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
41
Focusing on Learning
Knowledge Base Subject Content Curricular
Sequence Academic Rigor
Learning Theories
Pedagogies Learning Styles Learning
Activities
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
42
More than Inputs and Processes Outcomes
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
43
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Indicators
Direct Indicators Pre-Testing and Post-
Testing Capstone Courses Oral Examinations Internships Portfolio
Assessments
Direct Indicators Theses and
Dissertations Standardized Tests Licensure Exams Juried Reviews and
Performances
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
44
Assess Studentsrsquo Learning Outcomes Using Multiple Quantitative and
Qualitative Measures
Indirect Indicators Job Placement
Data Surveys of Alumni
and Students Surveys of
Employers
Indirect Indicators Program
Completion Rates Retention and
Transfer Studies Graduate follow-
up Studies
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
45
1 How are (y)our stated student learning outcomes appropriate to (y)our mission programs and degrees
2 What evidence do youwe have that students achieve (y)our stated learning outcomes
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
46
3 In what ways do youwe analyze and use evidence of student learning
4 How do youwe ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning
5 How do youwe evaluate and improve the effectiveness of (y)our efforts to assess and improve student learning
Assessment Conversations ldquoFive Prompt Questionsrdquo
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
47
The Commissionrsquos Requirement of a Member Institution
Host an Evaluation Team Inform Constituencies and the General Public Produce and Submit a Self-Study Report
including an Introductory ldquoInstitutional Snapshotrdquo
Conduct an Institution-wide Self-Study in the Context of the Commissionrsquos Criteria for Accreditation
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
48
Northern Arizona Universityrsquos Dynamic Existence
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
49
Engagement Strategies
Embed Engagement in Regular Mechanisms Used in Reaching Campus Off-Campus and Cyberspace Communities
Link to Existing Governing Structures Conduct Benchmarking Conversations Accreditation Web site Focused Groups Surveys Electronic Bulletin Board ldquoThird Party Commentrdquo
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
50
Comprehensive Evaluation Process[Two-Part Process]
InstitutionrsquosSelf-Study
CommissionrsquosPeer Review
Decision-Making
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
51
Peer Review Activities
Group Evaluation Review and Discussion
Formation of Team Recommendation
Share the Recommendation Write the Team Report
Individual Study of Institutionrsquos Materials and Website
Determination of Individual Perspective
Sharing of Perceptions
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
52
Visit Logistics
Three-day Visit and Peer Review
Sunday - Team Arrives Monday-Wednesday - Peer Review
Monday Entrance Conference with CEO and Others Monday-Wednesday - Interviews and Reviews of
Documents Evening Team Reflections Discussions and
Decision-making Wednesday - Announcement of Teamrsquos Planned
Recommendations and Exit Conference with CEO
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
53
The Team Report Format--Part I - Assurance Section--
1 Context and Nature of the Visit
2 Commitment to Peer Review
3 Compliance with Federal Requirements
4 Fulfillment of the Five Criteria
Evaluative Statements Evidence Criterion is Met Evidence that Criterion
Needs Institutional Attention
Evidence that Criterion Requires Institutional Attention and Follow-up by the Commission
Team Recommendation
5 Affiliation Status
6 Additional Comments and Explanations
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
54
The Team Report--Part II - Advancement Section--
1 Overall Observations about the Institution
2 Consultations of the Team3 Recognition of Significant
Accomplishments Significant Progress and Exemplary and Innovative Practice
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
55
The Accreditation Review Process
9 Board Validation8 Accreditation Decision by the Institutional
Actions Council or Review Committee7 Readers Panel or Review Committee6 Institutionrsquos Acceptance of Final Team Report5 Evaluation Teamrsquos Final Team Report4 Institutionrsquos Feedback to Team Chair3 Evaluation Teamrsquos Report [Draft]2 Evaluation Team Visit [Peer Review]1 Institutional Self-Study amp Snapshot
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602
56
Northern Arizona University
Working toward a Brighter Future[After the Team Has Gone]
57
Contacting The Higher Learning Commission
wwwncahlcorg
jtaylorhlcommissionorg
312-263-0456 Ext 104
30 North LaSalle Street Suite 2400 Chicago IL 60602