Upload
gervais-ramsey
View
219
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Simulation of Compressible Flow around the Bullet Trains
Project Members:Tatiya Sameeyai B5212828 Cheerawan Thetchanda B5228591
Project Advisor:Assist.Prof.Dr.Keerati Suluksna
School of Aeronautical Engineering, Institute of Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology
P R O J E C T
EngineeringEP-255X-X-XX
2
Background
P R O J E C T
Engineering
Fig.1The original model of bullet train head is usually encountered with shock effect during it run through the tunnel because of
rapidly change in density of air between outside-to-inside zone of tunnel.
Fig.2New model of bullet train head is designed like the king fisher bird to resolve the effect of shock.
3
Objective
P R O J E C T
Engineering
To Simulate the aerodynamics behavior around the two model of bullet trains, original and kingfisher models, under the condition of compressible flow.
4
Scopes
P R O J E C T
Engineering
Two models of bullet train heads, original and king fisher model, are determined in the project activities.
Three flow speed of 250, 270, 300 km/hr have been investigated in the simulation. The simulation will be investigated under the condition of turbulence compressible flow by means of CFD method with ANSYS Fluent 12.0 Tunnel bore size of 6.4 m will be considered here.
5
Expectation
The behaviors of air flow around the two models of bullet train head, the original and king fisher models, under the conditions of viscous and incompressible flow based on turbulence model prediction.
Comparison results of wall shear stress of two those models due to the skin friction.
P R O J E C T
Engineering
6
P R O J E C T
Engineering
ActivitiesCAD Files Creation
Fig.3 Bullet train geometries created from computer program for the original model (top) and new model (bottom)
7
Original Model:
Simulation results under the condition of (upper) incompressible flow and (lower) compressible flow
New Model (King fisher model):
Simulation results under the condition of (upper) incompressible flow and (lower) compressible flow
P R O J E C T
Engineering
ActivitiesSimulation Results: Wall Shear Stress
Fig.4 Comparison of predicted wall shear stress for the two considered models: (left) Original model and (right) New model (King fisher model)
8
P R O J E C T
Engineering Project Plan
Activities
1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 7Week 8Week 9Week 10 11
1 Survey the project information
2 Practice on software and validation
3 Create CAD models
4 Simulate the air flow
5 Conclusion and Report writing