Upload
anna-byrne
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
RDA IN THE UK
Summary of Survey Results
2
Overview
CILIP/BL & CIG Survey Monkey 78 responses
Awareness of RDA Implementation Context Training needs Next Steps
3
Awareness of RDA
RDA ICP FRBR FRAD
What is it? 3 25 6 10
Heard of it 39 32 36 43
Understand it 15 5 18 11
Explain it 9 2 5 1
“I know what [RDA] is, why it's been developed and where to find more information about it“
“I have studied FRBR but it looks very complicated as a basis for cataloguing rules”
“The terminology I find confusing, e.g. manifestations and expressions - none of the glossaries seem to make clear exactly what these mean at least not enough for me to explain it clearly to others.”
4
Have you attended any RDA familiarisation or awareness events?
Yes
No
60% of those answering yes attended CILIP Executive Briefings
20 % of those answering yes viewed ALA Webinars
5
Rate the following issues in order of importance for training:
2.70 2.80 2.90 3.00 3.10 3.20 3.30 3.40 3.50 3.60
Content, encoding anddisplay
Entities, atttributes andrelationships
Content and Carrier
RDA Elements and CoreElements
Differences betweenAACR2 and RDA
MARC 21 and RDA
“Training needs to be straightforward for non-professional cataloguers”
“How much the differences matter in day to day work.”
“…what changes do we need to make to [LMS] to gain the benefits”
“As I don't understand what most of these options are it's difficult to rank them”
6
Will your institution implement RDA?
Yes
No
Too early to say
“Advantages for cataloguing e-resources, digitisation projects”“…Depends on decisions of record creators (e.g. BL, BDS) and
LMS suppliers”“ Our initial reaction is not good - it would be more work therefore
more cost, which could not be coming at a worse time”“I was under the impression that there was no choice in this. I
thought it was replacing AACR2.”“Not even thought about it.”“We may not be able to justify the cost of the Toolkit!”
7
Implementation Context
8
What is your role?
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
Academic Library 58%
Public Library 14%
Government Library 10%
National Library 8.5%
Health Medical 7%
9
Approximately what percentage of your time is spent cataloguing or creating/editing metadata?
Less than 25%
Between 25% and 50%
Between 50% and 75%
More than 75%
10
What types of resources do you catalogue? (Tick all that apply)
0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%
100.0%
Archiv
al Material
s
Article
s
Cartograp
hic M
aterial
s
Data Set
s
e-Bo
oks
E-Jou
rnals
Ephem
era
Imag
es (S
till)
Man
uscript
s
Mov
ing Im
ages
Objects
/Rea
lia
Printed Bo
oks
Printed J o
urna
ls
Recor
ded Sou
nd
Sheet M
usic
Web
Pag
es
Art-specific materials: e.g. exhibition catalogues, artists' books
Grey literature produced in-house
DVD feature films TV programmes. GMD change will have a big impact
Tactile and audio formats
11
What proportion of resources are catalogued in-house?
Don't know
100%
75%
50%
25%
0%
“…all catalogued in-house, but …mostly upgrading rather than original cataloguing”“Level of cataloguing depends on type of material”“Moving to shelf ready service for book supply”“We do edit all records we download”
12
Does your institution create authority records for names, titles or subjects?
Yes
No
We contribute name authorities to NACO
All name, subject and series headings are under authority control. We don't download authority records
Subjects only - in house scheme
13
OthersLiberty
Open Galaxy
Spydus (Civica)
Which system(s) do you use for cataloguing and metadata creation/editing?
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
Aleph
D-Spa
ce
e-Pr
ints
Fedo
ra
Horizo
n
In-hou
se
Mille
nium
OCLC C
onne
xion
Symph
ony
Talis
TLC
Unico
rnVirt
ua
Voyag
er
14
Which formats or encoding schemes do you use?
0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%
100.0%
Dublin
Core
In-hou
se/lo
cal
MODS/M
ADS
EAD/E
ACONIX
MARC 2
1
UKMARC
UNIMARC
VRA Core
15
Which cataloguing rules or metadata instructions do you currently use for resource description and access?
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
AACR2 CartographicMaterials
DCRM(B) In-house/local ISAD(G)
16
What aspect of current rules causes most difficulty?
• Applying them to artefacts and non book materials
• Easily adapting for local practice - e.g. more detailed local material descriptions
• Expressing information about media/format
• Multi-part works - one record or several?
• None• AACR2's relationship with
MARC21 and the underlying database
• Punctuation • Applicability to modern
resources such as ebooks, DVDs, Web resources etc.
• Serials peculiarities
17
Training Needs
18
What topics should training cover for each of
these categories of staff?• It is important that the reasons for the adoption
of RDA are justified to decision makers and to all stakeholders”
• “Need a very simple and basic training package for most staff, and a more detailed offering for cataloguer”
• “FRBR … is not really apparent in the records or the catalogue display without different software and treatment of legacy records”
• “cataloguers and system administrators need practical hands on "this is how you do" type training”
“
19
What is your preferred method for delivery of RDA training
Develop in-house using own resources 47%
Deliver in-house using own trainers 41%
Deliver in-house using external trainers 28%
Deliver off-site 35%
Deliver on-line 35%
training likely to be organised by wider organisation. Hopefully all in-house
It depends on current financial constraints
I currently deliver MARC21 training to library assistant cataloguers so I would be expected by senior managers to deliver RDA training
Welsh language requirement
20
Man. Cat. Sys. Ref.
Half day 90% 40% 60% 60%
1 day 22% 57% 65% 13%
2 days 0% 94% 19% 0%
More 8% 92% 17% 0%
How much time would your institution be prepared to commit to training the following
groups of staff?
21
How much would your institution be willing to pay (per capita) for RDA training
<£100
£100-£199
£200-£299
£300-£400
>£400
22
Comments
• We expect to do training in house.• I would have thought it would be more
appropriate to charge mainly for time, with an element for the number of attendees
• A lot less than £100!• Our training budget is very limited. We could not
afford external training for all 10 cataloguers. Perhaps the 2 professionals could attend external training and cascade this to library assistants.
23
Comments
• If the changes were profound, which they are not likely to be in the short term, and the benefits demonstrable, then I think it might be acceptable to pay lots on training.
• We would be obliged to issue a call for tender
• funding would be for senior cataloguers only (2-3) and this would be cascaded
24
Would you be interested in assisting CIG to offer RDA training to other institutions?
Yes
No
25
Next steps
• Post results on CIG Website– Encourage discussion
• Invite new members to joint Task & Finish Group
• Plan modules required
• Evaluate delivery options
• Prepare materials
26
Secondary colour palette
27
Default shapes
Arrows and line styles (1.5pt stroke weight)
Descriptive text box with level 1 bullets
level 2 level 3
Circle with 14pt bold text
Rounded rectangle
28
Open, consultative management
Empowered, flexible
& diverse workforce
Non-hierarchical,
agile decision making
Demand-driven strategy: Chosen markets One brand Relevant to users
Distinctive through: World class collection Value-added services
& expertise
Delivered through: User-focused staff E-platforms The right partnerships
Pride
Relevance
Innov
atio
n
Staff who feel valued
& recognised
Strongperformance management
TO HELP PEOPLE
ADVANCE KNOWLEDGE
TO ENRICH LIVES
Example slide