28
1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

1

Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the

OSEP Reporting Categories

Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

Page 2: 1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 2

Functioning

Page 3: 1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 3

Entry

Page 4: 1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 4

Entry Exit

Page 5: 1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 5

Entry Exit

Page 6: 1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 6

Key Point

• The OSEP categories describe types of progress children can make between entry and exit

• Two COS ratings (entry and exit) are needed to calculate what OSEP category describes a child progress

Page 7: 1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

7

How changes in ratings on the COS correspond to reporting categories a - e

e. % of children who maintain functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers

• Rated 6 or 7 at entry; AND

• Rated 6 or 7 at exit

Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Page 8: 1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 8

Entry Exit

Page 9: 1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 9

Entry Exit

Page 10: 1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 10

Entry Exit

Page 11: 1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

11

How changes in ratings on the COS correspond to reporting categories a - e

d. % of children who improve functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers

• Rated 5 or lower at entry; AND

• Rated 6 or 7 at exit

Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Page 12: 1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 12

Entry Exit

Page 13: 1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

13

How changes in ratings on the COS correspond to reporting categories a - e

c. % of children who improved functioning to a level nearer to same aged peers, but did not reach it

• Rated higher at exit than entry; AND

• Rated 5 or below at exit

Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Page 14: 1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 14

Entry Exit

Page 15: 1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 15

Entry Exit

Page 16: 1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

How changes in ratings on the COS correspond to reporting categories a - e

b. % of children who improved functioning, but not sufficient to move nearer to same aged peers

• Rated 5 or lower at entry; AND

• Rated the same or lower at exit; AND

• “Yes” on the progress question (b)

16Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Page 17: 1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

How changes in ratings on the COS correspond to reporting categories a - e

b. % of children who improved functioning, but not sufficient to move nearer to same aged peers

OR•Rated 6 or 7 at entry; AND•Rated 5 or lower at exit; AND•“Yes” on the progress question

17Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Page 18: 1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 18

Entry Exit

Page 19: 1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 19

Entry Exit

Page 20: 1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 20

Entry Exit

Page 21: 1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 21

Entry Exit

Page 22: 1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

How changes in ratings on the COS correspond to reporting categories a - e

a. % of children who did not improve functioning

• Rated lower at exit than entry; OR

• Rated 1 at both entry and exit; AND

• Scored “No” on the progress question (b)

22Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Page 23: 1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 23

Entry Exit

Page 24: 1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 24

Entry Exit

Page 25: 1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

25

Federal Reporting Categories: Activity

COS Ratings to Progress Categories

Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Page 26: 1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

ECO Calculator

Page 27: 1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

27

ECO Calculator (Tutor)

http://www.fpg.unc.edu/~eco/outcomes.cfm

Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Page 28: 1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

The Early Childhood Outcomes Center 28

For more information….

www.the-eco-center.org