42
1 0 1 2 3 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 Score N o.ofScores Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1. 32.3 / 35 = 92.4 % 2. 26.9 / 30 = 89.5 % 3. 27.1 / 35 = 77.5 % Grade Curve •A 90 – 100 • A- 88 – 89 B+ 84 – 87 •B 78 – 83 • B- 75 – 77 • C+ 70 – 74 •C 65 - 69

1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

  • View
    219

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

1

0

1

2

3

50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100Score

No

. of

Sco

res

Midterm statistics – On campus students only

ECEN 5817Midterm Exam, Spring 2008On-campus studentsAverage = 86.3 %

Averages by problem:1. 32.3 / 35 = 92.4 %2. 26.9 / 30 = 89.5 %3. 27.1 / 35 = 77.5 %

Grade Curve• A 90 – 100• A- 88 – 89• B+ 84 – 87• B 78 – 83

• B- 75 – 77 • C+ 70 – 74• C 65 - 69

Page 2: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

2

AC modeling of quasi-resonant convertersExtension of State-Space Averaging to model non-PWM switches

Use averaged switch modeling technique: apply averaged PWM model, with d replaced by µ

Buck example with full-wave ZCS quasi-resonant cell:

+–

L

C R

+

v(t)

vg(t)

i(t)

+

v2(t)

i1(t) i2(t)

+

v1(t)

Lr

Cr

Full-wave ZCS quasi-resonant switch cell

+

v1r(t)

i2r(t)

D1

D2

Q1

Frequencymodulator

Gatedriver

vc(t)

µ = F

Page 3: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

3

Relevant material

• Background on state-space averaging: Textbook Section 7.3

• Background on circuit averaging and averaged switch modeling: Textbook Section 7.4

• Averaging the terminal waveforms of a resonant switch network: Textbook Section 20.2.2

• Handwritten notes on website, under “Materials on quasi-resonant converters”• Extension of state-space averaging to model dynamic

s of resonant switch converters

• A worked example: extended state-space averaging • Averaged switch modeling • Example: extended state-space averaging of a quasi-

resonant SEPIC

Page 4: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

4

7.3. State Space Averaging

• A formal method for deriving the small-signal ac equations of a switching converter

• Equivalent to the modeling method of the previous sections

• Uses the state-space matrix description of linear circuits

• Often cited in the literature

• A general approach: if the state equations of the converter can be written for each subinterval, then the small-signal averaged model can always be derived

• Computer programs exist which utilize the state-space averaging method

Page 5: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

5

7.3.1. The state equations of a network

• A canonical form for writing the differential equations of a system

• If the system is linear, then the derivatives of the state variables are expressed as linear combinations of the system independent inputs and state variables themselves

• The physical state variables of a system are usually associated with the storage of energy

• For a typical converter circuit, the physical state variables are the inductor currents and capacitor voltages

• Other typical physical state variables: position and velocity of a motor shaft

• At a given point in time, the values of the state variables depend on the previous history of the system, rather than the present values of the system inputs

• To solve the differential equations of a system, the initial values of the state variables must be specified

Page 6: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

6

State equations of a linear system, in matrix form

A canonical matrix form:

State vector x(t) contains inductor currents, capacitor voltages, etc.:

Input vector u(t) contains independent sources such as vg(t)

Output vector y(t) contains other dependent quantities to be computed, such as ig(t)

Matrix K contains values of capacitance, inductance, and mutual inductance, so that K dx/dt is a vector containing capacitor currents and inductor winding voltages. These quantities are expressed as linear combinations of the independent inputs and state variables. The matrices A, B, C, and E contain the constants of proportionality.

Page 7: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

7

Example

State vector

Matrix KInput vector Choose output vector as

To write the state equations of this circuit, we must express the inductor voltages and capacitor currents as linear combinations of the elements of the x(t) and u( t) vectors.

Page 8: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

8

Circuit equations

Find iC1 via node equation:

Find iC2 via node equation:

Find vL via loop equation:

Page 9: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

9

Equations in matrix form

The same equations:

Express in matrix form:

Page 10: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

10

Output (dependent signal) equations

Express elements of the vector y as linear combinations of elements of x and u:

Page 11: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

11

Express in matrix form

The same equations:

Express in matrix form:

Page 12: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

12

7.3.2. The basic state-space averaged model

Given: a PWM converter, operating in continuous conduction mode, with two subintervals during each switching period.

During subinterval 1, when the switches are in position 1, the converter reduces to a linear circuit that can be described by the following state equations:

During subinterval 2, when the switches are in position 2, the converter reduces to another linear circuit, that can be described by the following state equations:

Page 13: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

13

Page 14: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

14

Page 15: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

15

Equilibrium (dc) state-space averaged model

Provided that the natural frequencies of the converter, as well as the frequencies of variations of the converter inputs, are much slower than the switching frequency, then the state-space averaged model that describes the converter in equilibrium is

where the averaged matrices are

and the equilibrium dc components are

Page 16: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

16

Solution of equilibrium averaged model

Equilibrium state-space averaged model:

Solution for X and Y:

Page 17: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

17

Small-signal ac state-space averaged model

where

So if we can write the converter state equations during subintervals 1 and 2, then we can always find the averaged dc and small-signal ac models

Page 18: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

18

Relevant background

State-Space Averaging: see textbook section 7.3Averaged Circuit Modeling and Circuit Averaging: see textbook

section 7.4

Page 19: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

19

Page 20: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

20

Page 21: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

21

Averaged Switch Modeling

• Separate switch elements from remainder of converter

• Remainder of converter consists of linear circuit

• The converter applies signals xT to the switch network

• The switch network generates output signals xs

• We have solved for how xs

depends on xT

Page 22: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

22

Block diagram of converter

Switch network as a two-port circuit:

Page 23: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

23

The linear time-invariant network

Page 24: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

24

The circuit averaging step

To model the low-frequency components of the converter waveforms, average the switch output waveforms (in xs(t)) over one switching period.

Page 25: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

25

Relating the result to previously-derived PWM converter models: a buck is a buck, regardless of the switch

We can do this if we can express the average xs(t) in the form

Page 26: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

26

PWM switch: finding Xs1 and Xs2

Page 27: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

27

Finding µ: ZCS example

where, from previous slide,

Page 28: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

28

Derivation of the averaged system equationsof the resonant switch converter

Equations of the linear network(previous Eq. 1):

Substitute the averaged switch network equation:

Result:

Next: try to manipulate into sameform as PWM state-space averaged result

Page 29: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

29

Conventional state-space equations: PWM converter with switches in position 1

In the derivation of state-space averaging for subinterval 1:the converter equations can be written as a set of lineardifferential equations in the following standard form (Eq. 7.90):

But our Eq. 1 predicts that the circuit equations for this interval are:

These equations must be equal:

Solve for the relevant terms:

Page 30: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

30

Conventional state-space equations: PWM converter with switches in position 2

Same arguments yield the following result:

and

Page 31: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

31

Manipulation to standard state-space form

Eliminate Xs1 and Xs2 from previous equations.Result is:

Collect terms, and use the identity µ + µ’ = 1:

—same as PWM result, but with d µ

Page 32: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

32

Perturbation and Linearization

The switch conversion ratio µ is generally a fairlycomplex function. Must use multivariable Taylor series,evaluating slopes at the operating point:

Page 33: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

33

Small signal model

Substitute and eliminate nonlinear terms, to obtain:

Same form of equations as PWM small signal model. Hence same model applies, including the canonical model of Section 7.5.

The dependence of µ on converter signals constitutes built-in feedback.

Page 34: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

34

Salient features of small-signal transfer functions, for basic converters

Page 35: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

35

Parameters for various resonant switch networks

Page 36: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

36

Example 1: full-wave ZCSSmall-signal ac model

+

+

+–

L

RC

1 : F

Cr

Lr

Gm(s)

+

µ = F

Averaged switch equations: Linearize:

Resulting ac model:

Page 37: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

37

Low-frequency model

Tank dynamics occur only at frequency near or greater than switching frequency —discard tank elements

+

+–

L

RC

1 : F+

Gm(s)

—same as PWM buck, with d replaced by F

Page 38: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

38

Example 2: Half-wave ZCS quasi-resonant buck

+–

L

C R

+

v(t)

vg(t)

i(t)

+

v2(t)

i1(t) i2(t)

+

v1(t)

Lr

Cr

Half-wave ZCS quasi-resonant switch cell

+

v1r(t)

i2r(t)D1

D2

Q1

Frequencymodulator

Gatedriver

vc(t)

Now, µ depends on js:

Page 39: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

39

Small-signal modeling

with

Perturbation and linearization of µ(v1r, i2r, fs):

Linearized terminal equations of switch network:

Page 40: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

40

Equivalent circuit model

+

+–

L

RC

1 : µ0

Cr

+

Lr

+

Gm(s)

KiKv

Kc

Page 41: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

41

Low frequency model: set tank elements to zero

+–

L

RC

1 : µ0

+

Gm(s)

KiKv

Kc

Page 42: 1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: 1.32.3 / 35

42

Predicted small-signal transfer functionsHalf-wave ZCS buck

Full-wave: poles and zeroes are same as PWM

Half-wave: effective feedback reduces Q-factor and dc gains