15
1 Lubricant Safety Update: Current Research and Advocacy Efforts Global Regulatory Issues IRMA Global Teleconference January 24, 2011 Marc-André LeBlanc IRMA Secretary, Lube Wrangler

1 Lubricant Safety Update: Current Research and Advocacy Efforts Global Regulatory Issues IRMA Global Teleconference January 24, 2011 Marc-André LeBlanc

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1

Lubricant Safety Update: Current Research and Advocacy EffortsGlobal Regulatory Issues

IRMA Global TeleconferenceJanuary 24, 2011Marc-André LeBlancIRMA Secretary, Lube Wrangler

Regulation

Don’t regulators have to review

safety data before lubes are on the

market?

2

Regulation

Regulators in various countries classify lubes differently, depending on claims made by manufacturers

Application of different sets safety criteria for exact same product in different countries

• U.S. classifies lubes as medical devices

• Canada classifies them as cosmetics

3IRMA Lube Safety Working Group

Regulation

Safety criteria for medical devices usually stricter than cosmetics criteria

IRMA – current criteria insufficient based on info from lube studies to date

U.S. simply requires data from studies that test whether lubes irritate rabbit vaginas

Insufficient re: safety in human rectums 4IRMA Lube Safety Working Group

Regulation

In some contexts, some lubes are on the market w/out any regulatory approval

Some regulatory agencies have little to no power or resources to:

• force manufacturers to seek regulatory

approval

• take action regarding products that may

not be safe

5IRMA Lube Safety Working Group

Regulation

Even in jurisdictions where :• Regulatory agencies have very clear and

stringent safety criteria• Power and resources to enforce rigorously

• May still be no requirement to demonstrate safety for rectal use

• Manufacturers rarely indicate product intended for that use

6IRMA Lube Safety Working Group

Regulation – lack of clarity moment #1•No clarity around

safety tests to recommend, even if regulations demanded them

•Regulators likely to be hesitant to enforce tests that would yield limited safety info

Here’s the rub

7IRMA Lube Safety Working Group

Lack of clarity moment #2

Even if/when we know which lubes are better than others…

How does that translate into HIV/STI risk?

8IRMA Lube Safety Working Group

What is IRMA doing?

• Urge researchers to test lubes for rectal safety and to share findings

• Facilitate dialogue leading researchers/advocates in Lube Safety Working Group (wanna join?)

• Compile articles, studies maintain background document

9

What is IRMA doing?

• Make IRMA’s list of most widely-used lubes available to anyone interested in testing lubes

• Monitor how regulatory agencies in various countries address lube safety

• Engage with lube manufacturers• Keep IRMA membership updated

10

Conclusions

• Water-based lubes don’t look great BASED ON THE TESTS CONDUCTED TO DATE

• We don’t know how this translates into real-world use, real-world risk

• Is there a commitment to find out?• Can we ever imagine advocating for

AI without lubricant?

11

THE BOTTOM LINE:MORE RESEARCH IS URGENTLY NEEDED TO EXPLORE IF THERE IS A LINK BETWEEN LUBE USE AND ACQUIRING HIV AND /OR RECTAL STIS

13IRMA Lube Safety Working Group

Questions?14

Thank you

• Marc-André LeBlanc• [email protected]

15