View
213
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Health and Development
Health and development
• An observation: health and wealth are correlated both across countries and across people within societies. Why?
• Question #1: What is the impact of income on health and nutrition?
• Question #2: What is the impact of health/nutrition on economic outcomes?
• Question #3: Which policies / institutions improve the delivery of public health services in poor countries?
2
The health-wealth relationship
• Disentangling the relationships between health and wealth and uncovering causal relationships in either direction is very tricky– Fundamental endogeneity problem– Measurement issues– Health: inputs (nutrition, expenditure) or output (health
status)– Proper measurement of inputs: adjustment for quality,
wastage– Wealth: short or long run? Measurement error in income– Functional form: non-linearities are key to the story, but it
may not be possible to observe them
• Table 1 (Strauss and Thomas): Wide variety in the estimates of the elasticities of calorie demand with respect to household resources (0.01 to 0.82)
3
Income and expenditure elasticities of calorie demand
4
Deaton and Subramanian (1996)
• Nonparametric approach to examining the impact of wealth on health
• Data set: 5,630 households in 563 villages• Recall data on 149 food items, meals taken out and given
away, etc.– From those 149 food items, they calculate caloric intake
using a conversion table. Also correct for meals taken out and meals given to people.
• Interesting aspect of this work: non-parametric estimatesy = g(x) + e
• How can we estimate g(x)?– Kernel regression– Fan (1992) locally weighted regression
5
Results
• Positive relationship between income and nutrition, precisely estimated even non-parametrically
• The elasticity declines with outlay, but not dramatically. Sample of poor people.
• Price per calories paid increase with outlay. Richer households pay more per calorie– Rich: 1.50 rupees per 1000 calories– Average: 1.14 rupees per 1000 calories– Poor: 0.88 rupees
• Price elasticity of calories seems constant
6
Calories vs. expenditure (nonparametrics)
7
Price per calorie vs. expenditure (nonparam.)
8
Parametric analysis
9
Main takeaways in Deaton and Subramanian
• Nutrition does increase with per capita PCE– Elasticity of calories declines with PCE, from 0.65 to 0.4– But they do substitute towards more expensive calories
• Income elasticity of food expenditure about 0.75, roughly evenly split between increased calories and increased price per calorie
• Implausible that malnutrition is the cause of poverty, rather than vice versa: adequate nutrition can be purchased for 4% of daily wage
• Nice exploration of data, but endogeneity problem is not solved here
10
Health and development
• An observation: health and wealth are correlated both across countries and across people within societies. Why?
• Question #1: What is the impact of income on health and nutrition?
• Question #2: What is the impact of health/nutrition on economic outcomes?
• Question #3: Which policies / institutions improve the delivery of public health services in poor countries?
11
12
Sharon MacciniUniversity of Michigan
Dean YangUniversity of Michigan
Under the Weather:Health, Schooling, and Socioeconomic
Consequences of Early-Life Rainfall
13
Motivation
• Life in rural areas of developing countries is prone to many kinds of risk
• In addition to short-run effects, consequences of certain shocks may be felt many years or even decades later– Important for targeting of public resources that help
cushion impact of shocks
• Health shocks at the earliest stages of life, by affecting long-run health human capital, may have effects that extend into adulthood
14
Pigs
15
This paper …
• Examines the long-run impact of exogenous environmental shocks in early life– Rainfall shocks in locality and year of birth, for
Indonesian adults– Health as well as socioeconomic outcomes
• Compares long-run impact of shocks experienced at different points in early life– Tests for the existence of “critical periods” in child
development
• Provides suggestive evidence on the pathways through which early-life rainfall affects adult outcomes
16
Summary of results
• For women, 20% higher birthyear rainfall leads to:
– Better health: 0.57 centimeters greater height, 3.8 percentage points less likely to report poor/very poor health
– More education: 0.22 more completed grades of schooling
– Improved socioeconomic status: 0.12 standard deviation higher asset index in household
• No corresponding effects for men, possibly due to gender bias in household resource allocation in hard times
• Rainfall in the first year of life has greatest effect on adult outcomes
• Evidence consistent with the following chain of causation: Early-life rainfall infant health schooling adult SES
17
Critical-period programming
• Exposure to certain stimuli during a sensitive time span may have irreversible effects on living organisms
• “Fetal origins hypothesis”: The fetal stage and infancy are critical periods in human physical development– Early-life shocks can have long-lasting effects on health
(Barker 1998)
• Faced with poor nutrition/health conditions, limited resources prioritized for brain, compromising physical growth and development of other organ systems– Individuals are “programmed” for smaller body size, worse
health later in life
• Evidence:– Animal studies (see figures)– Epidemiological research in human populations
• But causality often questionable
18
Critical periods in rat nutrition
Source: Figures 2.2 and 2.3, Barker (1998)
19
Critical periods in rat nutrition
Source: Figures 2.2 and 2.3, Barker (1998)
20
Identifying the impact of early-life shocks
• Relate later life outcomes to early-life health conditions– e.g., cross-sectional differences in birthplace infant
mortality, individual self-reported health status Open to omitted variable concerns
• Examine impact of shocks to health conditions at birth– e.g., within-twin birthweight differences, epidemics Difficult to generalize results from unusual events Data often a serious limitation
• We examine impact of an important source of environmental variation in developing countries: rainfall– Using high-quality survey data in IFLS
21
Contemporaneous impact of rainfall
• Higher rainfall raises agricultural productivity in Indonesia– Secondary sources verify that droughts are
associated with food insecurity historically– Levine and Yang (2006): positive rainfall shocks
associated with increases in rice output across Indonesian districts in 1990s
• Higher agricultural output should lead to higher household income– Better ability to purchase nutrition, health inputs
and otherwise nurturing environments for infants
22
Regression equation
• For outcome Yijst for individual i born in district j in season s of year t:
Yijst = Rjt + js + st + jsTREND + ijst
• Rainfall shock Rjt is at district-year level
• Birthdistrict-season fixed effects (js) account for time-invariant differences across people born in the same district in the same season
• Birthyear-season (cohort) fixed effects (st) account for Indonesia-wide shocks
• District-season-specific linear time trends absorb long-running linear trends in outcomes that vary across districts– Mainly helps absorb residual variation
Measurement error
• Rainfall is measured at the closest weather station to the birth district in the birth year– But is only imperfectly correlated with actual rainfall
in the individual’s birth locality
• Leads to attenuated coefficient estimates
• Solution: instrument early-life rainfall with similar variables whose errors are likely to be orthogonal– Instruments: early-life rainfall in 2nd- through 5th-
closest weather stations to birth district in birth year
23
24
Data
• Indonesia Family Life Survey (IFLS)– Adults observed in wave 3 (2000): ~4,600 women, ~4,300
men born outside of major cities between 1953-1974– Anthropometrics, other health outcomes, socioeconomic
outcomes
• Global Historical Climatology Network (GHCN) Precipitation and Temperature Data (Version 3)– National Climatic Data Center, NOAA– Contains monthly rainfall records at 200+ rainfall stations
in Indonesia– Each IFLS birth district matched with closest rainfall
station
– Rainfall variable: log rainfall - log mean district rainfall
(from 1953-1999)
25
Early-life rainfall and adult health
26
Early-life rainfall and other outcomes
27
Nonparametric estimates
28
Nonparametric estimates
29
Effect of rainfall before and after birthyear
30
Potential selection concerns
• Potential negative bias – High rainfall differential survival of weakest infants
• Potential positive bias:– High-SES parents may time births to occur during good
rainfall years • Unlikely that parents can forecast rainfall so far in
advance• Also: controlling for past rainfall doesn’t change results
• Tests for selection:– Is early-life rainfall associated with size of cohorts
observed in our data?– Is early-life rainfall associated with parental education?
31
Rainfall and inclusion in sample
32
Rainfall and parental characteristics
33
Pathways to adult SES
34
In closing
• For women, higher early-life rainfall leads to better health, higher educational attainment, and improved socioeconomic status– No corresponding effects for men– Likely pathway to adult SES is via schooling
• Link to consumption smoothing literature– Does not mean that consumption smoothing mechanisms
were not operative– But does suggest that they were only partially effective, and
this partial failure had long-run effects
• Implications for policy– Identifies a group—female infants—whose later-life fortunes
are strongly tied to early-life conditions– Justification for interventions that shield infants from the
health consequences of temporary environmental and economic shocks
• E.g., weather insurance, social insurance schemes, public health investments, food security policies
Health and development
• An observation: health and wealth are correlated both across countries and across people within societies. Why?
• Question #1: What is the impact of income on health and nutrition?
• Question #2: What is the impact of health/nutrition on economic outcomes?
• Question #3: Which policies / institutions improve the delivery of public health services in poor countries?
35
Health inputs and health
• Question: why might there be scope for public intervention in the health sector? In other words, why don’t households provide the necessary health investments themselves privately?
• Within-household agency problems or imperfect parental altruism towards children
• Positive treatment externalities
• Poor (or incorrect) knowledge of new health technologies among individuals
• Credit constraints prevent good health investments
36
Kremer and Miguel (2004)
• Worm infections (e.g., hookworm, whipworm, roundworm, schistosomiasis) are among the world’s most common infections
• Paper studies school-based deworming treatment– In sample of rural Kenyan school children, over 90%
were infected at baseline. Between one third and one half had “serious” infections
• Worms pass larvae out through human fecal matter, infecting others– Treatment generates a positive externality by
reducing this transmission to others
37
Study set-up
• 75 primary schools, over 30,000 children (aged 6-18)
• Deworming treatment (drugs, health education) phased in randomly across three treatment groups– Groups are similar along observables– Listed school alphabetically (by zone), and counted off 1-
2-3, 1-2-3, etc. – Thus the placement of schools into groups was not done
by a random number generator, but is completely arbitrary and orthogonal to omitted variables
• Group 1: treatment 1998 and 1999• Group 2: no treatment 1998, treatment 1999• Group 3: no treatment in 1998 or 1999
38
Table 1
39
Table V: Simple T vs. C comparison(no account for externalities)
40
Estimating externalities
• One of the goals of the paper is to compare the naive treatment effect estimator, “Treatment minus comparison”, E( Yij | T1i =1) – E( Yij | T1i =0), to estimators that take into account “contamination” of the experiment from externalities
• This contamination may produce gains in the comparison group
• Externalities would lead to doubly under-estimating treatment effects– Miss impacts in the comparison group– Understate impacts in the treatment group
• A real concern in existing studies that randomize within schools and often found no significant impact
41
Regression equation
42
Table VII: Externality estimates
43
Table IX
44
Table X: No effect on test scores
45