Upload
kent-abner
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Economics and Limits to Growth: What’s Sustainable?
Dennis Meadowsat
The Population Institute Washington, DCOctober 6, 2009
2
The Reference Scenario
Resources
PopulationPollution
Industrial Output
Food
OriginalReport
Today
3
Main Insights from the Scenario• In 1972 we expected another 40-80 years of growth.• All our scenarios showed growth ending in the period
2010-2050. • The preponderant mode was overshoot and decline, not
gradual slowing within a limit. • Changes in technology may delay the end of growth by a
few years, but they do not avoid it, and they do not avoid the decline.
• Social changes are essential for the attractive futures.• What are today considered to be problems are actually
symptoms. The real problem is physical growth in material and energy flows pressing against the limits of a finite planet.
4
Main Points of My Speech• Growth has continued until we are now past
sustainable levels. • The global society will change more over the next 20
years than in the past 100. Design policies for what is coming, not what has been.
• The main forces for change will be climate change and resource scarcity - especially fossil fuels and water.
• The end of growth does not result from total depletion, but from rising capital costs.
• The most important scarcity is the absence of a longer-term perspective.
5
World Population
6
Industrial Production
7
Index of World Metals Use
8
“Sind die Menschen noch zu retten?” Die Zeit, 16.11.06
If current trends of overfishing and pollution continue, .. all seafood faces collapse by 2048.
By the middle of the century … no fewer than 7 billion people in 60 countries may be faced with water scarcity.
Human beings and the natural world are on a collision course. .. Fundamental changes are urgent….
- more than 1,600 scientists, including 102 Nobel laureates, from 70 countries
(Ignoring climate change) “could create risks of major Disruption to economic and social activity… on a scaleSimilar to those associated with the great wars.”Stern Review October 2006
9
One Indicator of Overshoot
10
Other Indicators of Overshoot
11
The Sequence of Objections
• 1970s: There are no limits.
• 1980s: There are limits, but they are distant in time.
• 1990s: The limits are near, but they are irrelevant, since they will be dealt with by the market.
• 2000s: The market is not adequate, but new technologies will let us evade the limits without requiring that we stop growth.
12
Capital Cost of Discovery
0 1Fraction of Resource Remaining
Cost
13
Capital Cost of Abatement
0 1Fraction of Sink Remaining
Cost
14
Energy Return on Investment
15
16
The Time of Greatest Stress• Most people assume that the major global
difficulties would occur after the end to growth. • This is not correct.• The globe’s population would experience the most
stress prior to the peak, as pressures mount high enough to neutralize the enormous political, demographic, and economic forces that now sustain growth.
• We are in the early phases of that period now.
17
CO2 Concentration
18
Four Factors Determine the Amount of CO2 Emissions
CO2 Emissions
Number Units of Energy Fraction of of x Capital x Required per x Energy from People Per Person Capital Unit Fossil Fuels
Demography Technology
Solar Energy
CulturalNorms
Efficiency
© Dennis Meadows; 2007
19
A Problem
Now Future
Bet
ter
----
--->
Next Evaluation
Actual Desired
Time Horizon
20
Easy Problems
Now Future
Bet
ter
----
--->
Next Evaluation
Action #1
Actual Desired
Action #2
21
Difficult Problems
Now Future
Bet
ter
----
--->
Next Evaluation
Action #1Action #2
ActualDesired
22
Relying on Present Net Value to Choose Assumes:
• All consequences of an action are known
• All consequences can be expressed in monetary units; they are commensurate
• We are the ones entitled to pick the interest rate
• Maximizing financial benefits is the goal of society
• Current mistakes can be corrected by paying some cost in the future
Every single one of these assumptions is false for the issue of climate change!!