26
1 2014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference #IHCC14 Employment Law Update WHERE WE’VE BEEN… AND WHERE WE’RE GOING: A look back at 2013 and a look forward to 2014 January 22, 2014 Los Angeles, California Sponsored by Jackson Lewis P.C. Moderator: Kristi Ashman Panelists: Elisabeth Lilly, Mindy S. Novick, and Adam Y. Siegel #IHCC1 2

1 2014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference #IHCC14 Employment Law Update WHERE WE’VE BEEN… AND WHERE WE’RE GOING: A look back at 2013 and a look forward

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 2014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference #IHCC14 Employment Law Update WHERE WE’VE BEEN… AND WHERE WE’RE GOING: A look back at 2013 and a look forward

12014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference #IHCC14

Employment Law Update

WHERE WE’VE BEEN… AND WHERE WE’RE GOING:A look back at 2013 and a look forward to 2014

January 22, 2014Los Angeles, California

Sponsored by Jackson Lewis P.C.

Moderator: Kristi AshmanPanelists:

Elisabeth Lilly, Mindy S. Novick, and Adam Y. Siegel

#IHCC12

Page 2: 1 2014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference #IHCC14 Employment Law Update WHERE WE’VE BEEN… AND WHERE WE’RE GOING: A look back at 2013 and a look forward

090701_2 2

#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference

Kristi Ashman– BakerCorp/Assistant General Counsel– [email protected]

Elisabeth B. Lilly– Northrop Grumman/Senior Counsel– [email protected]

Mindy S. Novick– Jackson Lewis P.C./Shareholder– [email protected]

Adam Y. Siegel– Jackson Lewis P.C./Shareholder– [email protected]

Panelists

Page 3: 1 2014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference #IHCC14 Employment Law Update WHERE WE’VE BEEN… AND WHERE WE’RE GOING: A look back at 2013 and a look forward

090701_3 3

#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference

The Year In Review

California Cases

Federal Cases

What To Expect In The Year Ahead

California Pending Cases

California Statutes For 2014

Federal Outlook

Agenda

Page 4: 1 2014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference #IHCC14 Employment Law Update WHERE WE’VE BEEN… AND WHERE WE’RE GOING: A look back at 2013 and a look forward

090701_4 4

#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference

The Year In Review:

California Cases

Agenda

Page 5: 1 2014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference #IHCC14 Employment Law Update WHERE WE’VE BEEN… AND WHERE WE’RE GOING: A look back at 2013 and a look forward

090701_5 5

#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference

Does the “mixed motive” defense apply to employment discrimination claims under FEHA?– Yes: To establish liability employee must show unlawful

discrimination was a substantial factor motivating the adverse employment decision, instead of simply a motivating factor.

– If employer proves it would have made the same adverse employment decision absent such discrimination: Employee prevails but Employee recovers nothing But employee’s attorneys fees will be paid by employer

Harris v. City of Santa Monica 56 Cal.4th 203

Page 6: 1 2014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference #IHCC14 Employment Law Update WHERE WE’VE BEEN… AND WHERE WE’RE GOING: A look back at 2013 and a look forward

090701_6 6

#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference

CA Supreme Court held: (1) it is against public policy and unconscionable to require

employee to waive right to a Berman hearing and

(2) rule is not preempted by FAA.

US Supreme Court granted cert., vacated and remanded to CA Supreme Court for further consideration in light of AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion.

Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. Morena (Sonic 1)51 Cal.4th 659 (9/2013)

Page 7: 1 2014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference #IHCC14 Employment Law Update WHERE WE’VE BEEN… AND WHERE WE’RE GOING: A look back at 2013 and a look forward

090701_7 7

#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference

After remand to CA Supreme Court FAA preempts state-law rule categorically requiring Berman hearing

before arbitration

Unconscionability – procedural or substantive - remains a viable contract defense; not preempted by FAA

Rule that does not discriminate against arbitration on its face “must not disfavor arbitration as applied by imposing procedural requirements that interfere[] with fundamental attributes of arbitration….”

Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. Morena (Sonic 2)2013 Cal. LEXIS 10220 (10/17/2013)

Page 8: 1 2014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference #IHCC14 Employment Law Update WHERE WE’VE BEEN… AND WHERE WE’RE GOING: A look back at 2013 and a look forward

090701_8 8

#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference

Joint representation of company and employee witness for deposition by in-house counsel

Possibility of conflicting testimony exists but is not explained to employee – no joint rep letter

Examination at deposition by plaintiff does not expose a conflict

Company attorney at deposition asks questions that calls the credibility of witness into question

Yanez v. Plummer 213 Cal.App.4th 1331 (11/5/2013)

Page 9: 1 2014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference #IHCC14 Employment Law Update WHERE WE’VE BEEN… AND WHERE WE’RE GOING: A look back at 2013 and a look forward

090701_9 9

#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference

Issue: Does Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board decision that plaintiffs are not employees collaterally estop the Labor Commissioner from assessing penalties for inaccurate wage statements?

Yes.

Happy Nails & Spa v. Su, as Labor Commissioner 217 Cal. App. 4th 1459 (7/19/13)

Page 10: 1 2014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference #IHCC14 Employment Law Update WHERE WE’VE BEEN… AND WHERE WE’RE GOING: A look back at 2013 and a look forward

090701_10 10

#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference

Trial court certified “off-the clock” class

Rehearing based on Dukes v. Wal-Mart - trial court decertified class

Plaintiffs appealed to CA Supreme Court– court granted review and returned case to appellate

court with directions to issue OSC why class should be certified

Holding on remand: writ of mandate to trial court to vacate decertification and re-instate class certification

Williams v. Sup. Ct. (Allstate Ins. Co.)___ Cal.App.4th ___, B244043 (12/6/2013)

Page 11: 1 2014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference #IHCC14 Employment Law Update WHERE WE’VE BEEN… AND WHERE WE’RE GOING: A look back at 2013 and a look forward

090701_11 11

#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference

Plaintiff filed complaint against Defendant (staffing agency) alleging failure to provide meal and rest breaks, failure to pay overtime

Plaintiff alleged a common practice was the failure to adopt and implement policies in compliance with Labor Code– Trial court denied class certification relying on Brinker

– Reversed and remanded for consideration of class certification

Defendant filed motion for re-hearing; fully briefed

Benton v. Telecom Network Specialists, Inc. B242441, ___ CA4th ___ (10/16/2013)

Page 12: 1 2014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference #IHCC14 Employment Law Update WHERE WE’VE BEEN… AND WHERE WE’RE GOING: A look back at 2013 and a look forward

090701_12 12

#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference

Appeal from summary judgment granted in favor of defendant; reversed and remanded for trial

Employee (bartender) became intoxicated at annual holiday party

Employee drove home but then left to drive another employee home

Accident resulted in death of 3rd party

If proximate cause of injury occurred within scope of employment, ER may be held liable

Purton v. Marriott International 218 Cal.App.4th 499 (7/31/2013)

Page 13: 1 2014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference #IHCC14 Employment Law Update WHERE WE’VE BEEN… AND WHERE WE’RE GOING: A look back at 2013 and a look forward

090701_13 13

#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference

The Year In Review:

Federal Cases

Agenda

Page 14: 1 2014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference #IHCC14 Employment Law Update WHERE WE’VE BEEN… AND WHERE WE’RE GOING: A look back at 2013 and a look forward

090701_14 14

#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference

Issue: Is state law preempted by FAA?– No.

Issue: Is arbitration agreement unconscionable under state law?– Yes. Motion to compel arbitration denied.– Procedurally unconscionable – take it or leave, terms not

provided until 3 weeks after employee agreed to be bound– Substantively unconscionable – arbitrator selection process

unfair, precluded institutional arbitration administrators, arbitrator fee-apportionment provision prohibitive

Chavarria v. Ralphs Grocery Co.__ F3d ___ (9th Cir. 10/28/2013)

Page 15: 1 2014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference #IHCC14 Employment Law Update WHERE WE’VE BEEN… AND WHERE WE’RE GOING: A look back at 2013 and a look forward

090701_15 15

#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference

Duran v. US Bank Ass’n– Wage & hour class action

Iskanian v. CLS Transportation– Arbitration agreements in class actions

Ayala v. Antelope Valley Newspapers, Inc.– Independent contractors in class actions

Peabody v. Time Warner Cable (9th Cir.)– Allocation of commission payments

Salas v. Sierra Chemical Co.; Richey v. AutoNation– Defenses available when after-acquired evidence found

What To Expect In The Year Ahead

Page 16: 1 2014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference #IHCC14 Employment Law Update WHERE WE’VE BEEN… AND WHERE WE’RE GOING: A look back at 2013 and a look forward

090701_16 16

#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference

Once PDLL expires – does ER have additional obligations?– Employee had high risk pregnancy, required long bed rest. – Employer provided 19 weeks of leave, including vacation days

and time off under the PDLL and CFRA. – Employee fired after expiration of PDLL and CFRA.

 Yes. Employer must engage in interactive process and determinate whether further leave is a reasonable accommodation

 So, 4 month PDLL is the beginning, not end, of accommodation process for pregnant employees.

Sanchez v. Swissport, Inc. 213 Cal.App.4th 1331 (2013))

Page 17: 1 2014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference #IHCC14 Employment Law Update WHERE WE’VE BEEN… AND WHERE WE’RE GOING: A look back at 2013 and a look forward

090701_17 17

#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference

Certified questions to CA Supreme Court– (1) Does “nature of the work” refer to specific EE’s

tasks or job title’s tasks?– (2) To determine if the nature of work “reasonably

permits” the use of a seat, may ER use business judgment?

– (3) If employee denied seat, does employee have to prove what would constitute “suitable seats”?

Kilby v. CVS Pharmacy, 9th Cir. No. 12-56130, No. S215614Henderson v. JP Morgan, 9th Cir. No. 13-56095, No. S215614 (12/31/13)

Page 18: 1 2014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference #IHCC14 Employment Law Update WHERE WE’VE BEEN… AND WHERE WE’RE GOING: A look back at 2013 and a look forward

090701_18 18

#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference

Federal Outlook

Agenda for 2014

Page 19: 1 2014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference #IHCC14 Employment Law Update WHERE WE’VE BEEN… AND WHERE WE’RE GOING: A look back at 2013 and a look forward

090701_19 19

#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference

OFCCP finalizing regulations that will require federal government contractors to move toward a 7% disabled workforce and to hire more veterans.

CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECKS:– Employers told to consider:

Nature or gravity of offense or conduct Time elapsed since offense, conviction, release Nature of job sought

– OFCCP’s Directive 306, “Complying with Nondiscrimination Provisions: Criminal Record Restrictions and Discrimination Based on Race and National Origin,” issued on January 29, 2013

Federal Outlook

Page 20: 1 2014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference #IHCC14 Employment Law Update WHERE WE’VE BEEN… AND WHERE WE’RE GOING: A look back at 2013 and a look forward

090701_20 20

#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference

California Statutes For 2014

Agenda for 2014

Page 21: 1 2014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference #IHCC14 Employment Law Update WHERE WE’VE BEEN… AND WHERE WE’RE GOING: A look back at 2013 and a look forward

090701_21 21

#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference

Support animals are a reasonable accommodation – and it’s not just dogs!

Definitions now include examples – broad examples – of disabilities and reasonable accommodations

Expands definition of “health care providers to include (M&F therapists, acupuncturists, podiatrists, dentists, clinical psychologists, chiropractors, midwives and PAs)

California Disability Regulations

Page 22: 1 2014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference #IHCC14 Employment Law Update WHERE WE’VE BEEN… AND WHERE WE’RE GOING: A look back at 2013 and a look forward

090701_22 22

#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference

An employee who complains internally about alleged violation of law or threat to public safety is protected

Before, employee had to make a complaint to an outside agency

What can you expect?A LOT MORE WHISTLEBLOWING SUITS

“Whistleblower” Law, SB 496; eff. 1/1/14

Page 23: 1 2014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference #IHCC14 Employment Law Update WHERE WE’VE BEEN… AND WHERE WE’RE GOING: A look back at 2013 and a look forward

090701_23 23

#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference

SB 435 Missed “cool down” and “recovery” periods added to missed meal and rest breaks for which denial results in penalty of one hours pay

California Statutes For 2014

Page 24: 1 2014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference #IHCC14 Employment Law Update WHERE WE’VE BEEN… AND WHERE WE’RE GOING: A look back at 2013 and a look forward

090701_24 24

#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference

Draft arbitration agreements with clarity and certainty

Review current policies to ensure compliance with new or amended statutes

Ensure managerial/supervisory employees are trained on what to do regarding policies, procedures, statutes

Significant Take-Aways

Page 25: 1 2014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference #IHCC14 Employment Law Update WHERE WE’VE BEEN… AND WHERE WE’RE GOING: A look back at 2013 and a look forward

090701_25 25

#IHCC142014 ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference

Questions?