Upload
delilah-holmes
View
222
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
20052005
2004.05.01
2
3
INTERNATIONAL ROUTES OF ILLEGAL MIGRATION
INTERNATIONAL ROUTES OF ILLEGAL MIGRATION
4
Changes in the Organisation of the Border Guard and Recent Shifts in Migration
Phenomena after EU Accession
5
TERRITORIAL ORGANISATION OF THE B.G.
Organs Quantity
National Headquarters (Central level) 1
B.G.R.D. (territorial level) 10
Local level
Border Guarding Offices 71
Border Traffic Control Offices 54
Crim. Inv. and Intelligence Services 26
Mobile Forces 15
Alien Policing Centres 8
Organs at local level in total 174
Organs EU -external EU -internal Quantity
National Headquarters (central level) 0 1 1
B.G.R.D. (Territorial level) 5 5 10
Local level
Border Policing Offices 42 21 63
Crim. Inv. and Intelligence Services 14 12 26
Mobile Forces 10 5 15
Alien Policing Centres 5 3 8
Organs at local level in total 71 41 112
2003
16.06.2004
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
HŐR
6
Visszautasítási őrizet végrehajtása igazgatósági bontásban
1530 1491
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
2003 2004
GyőrSzombathelyNagykanizsaKiskunhalasOrosházaNyírbátorBalassagyarmatBHI
Győr
Szombathely
Nagykanizsa
Balassagyarmat
Miskolc
Nyírbátor
Orosháza
Kiskunhalas
Budapest
Pécs
JELMAGYARÁZAT
Határőr Igazgatóság
Szerbia-Montenegró
Ukrajna
Ausztria
Horvátország
Románia
Szlovákia
Szlovénia
4.169 persons
5.906 persons
3.569 persons
1.060 persons
The number of applying (as a preventive measure) refusal of entry has risen: 24.572 in 2004
Main reasons for applying refusal of entry:
• prohibition of entry and stay (28%)• absence of a valid passport (15%)• falsification of official records (5%)• absence of a visa valid for Hungary (45%)• absence of a visa valid for travelling on from
HU(3%)
Statistics on application of refusal of entry in Hungary (2004)Statistics on application of refusal of entry in Hungary (2004)
6.
7
2002.01.01-2002.12.31.
belső50%
külső 50%
Internal 50 %
External 50 %
Illegal Crossing of the Border and its Attempt at our External and Internal Borders
2003.01.01. -2003.12.31.
Internal 67 %
External 33 %
8
592 fő3024 fő
2004.
External border
Internal border
84 %
16 %
Illegal Crossing of the Border and its Attempt at our External and Internal Borders (2004)
Illegal Crossing of the Border and its Attempt at our External and Internal Borders (2004)
9
Changes in the Measures against Illegal Migration
Infringements of the law are mostly detected at the border crossing points.
(green border: 23 %; border crossing points : 55%; within the country: 22 %)
10
34.CUSTOMS AND FINANCE GUARD
NATIONAL INSPECTORATEOF LABOUR AND LABOUR SAFETY
BORDER GUARDS
POLICEOFFICE OF
IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY (OIN)
ORGANIZATIONS DEALING WITH MIGRATION IN
HUNGARY
11Countrywide activity of Criminal Investigation and Intelligence Service; Alien Policing and Petty Offence.
Patrolling on the territory of 8-20 km
Cooperation of the executive units along the external borders
Coordination among the services, common patrolling along the internal borders of Austria, Slovenia,Slovakia
Operating the illegal migration net, Border Guards, Police, Custom and Finance Service Immigration and Naturalization Office, National Inspectorate of Labour and Labour Safety
12
Falsification of Official Records: 3.181 cases in 2004
• Permesso di Soggiorno,
• Slovakian IDs,• falsified Lithuanian
passport and travel documents of EU Member states
13
People Smuggling 660 persons in 2004
14
Smuggling of Tobacco Products
2003: 117 million HUF- 460.000 €
2004: 175 million HUF- 700.000 €
15
Asylum seekers in Hungary
9554
580
8974
6412
441
5971
2401
659
1742 1600
503
1097
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
2001 2002 2003 2004
Applicants
European
non-European
16
Left the reception centre without permission, attempted prohibited
crossing of the border persons Total
Georgian 40% 274
Algeri 14% 96
Turkish 7% 50
Iraqi 4% 30
Armenian 4% 28
Russian 4% 27
Afghan 4% 26
Serbian 3% 24
Moldovan 2% 16
Irani 2% 13
misc. 16% 113
Total 2471 / 697
Percentage 28%
17
Main Factors Affecting Border SafetyMain Factors Affecting Border Safety
GLOBAL FACTORS• migratory movements
• organised crime features being part of the migration phenomenon
• fight against terrorism
REGIONAL FACTORS
INTERNAL FACTORS
• difficulties arising from the abolition of internal borders
• very limited financial possibilities
• possible use of EU funds
• need for strategic partnership (Police, OIN, Customs and Finance Guard, MFA)
• reforms of public administration
• modifications of relevant acts
(Constitution, Act on BG, Aliens Act, Act on Asylum)
• citizens’ claims for further abolition of internal borders, and making external border crossing easier
• preparations of new EU MSs for Schengen accession
• process of integration of the Balkans : further EU enlargement (2007: Romania, Bulgaria) Croatia Turkey Western Balkans
• Widening international co-operation
• establishment of the External Borders Agency (May 2005)
• situation of Ukraine and Moldova affecting border security
18
XII.
XII. International Border Police Conference
Siófok, May 09-12th 2004
50 countries and
18 organizations
participated in 2004
19
T r a i n i n g
• Implementation of a common project with our Spanish partners aiming at the updating of the training system of the Turkish Border Guards
-- from January 1st 2006 onwards
• Submitting a project proposal to participate in a twinning programme aiming at facilitating the preparations for Schengen accession of the Romanian Border Police (assessment of applications is underway)
20
Hungary situated at the gates of Ukraine and the Balkans plays an important role in the border security system of the EU.
We have to possess broad range of information on the authorities participating in migration management in the new EU MSs and those of our neighbouring countries situated at the EU’s external border (organisational structure, legislation on their operation);
Up-to-date information on illegal migration channels, as well as on current changes in the migration phenomenon can be obtained;
Provides a useful forum for exchange of views helping to better understand possible ways for action;
Gives excellent opportunities to establish personal contacts supporting exchange of experiences.
21
1. Same area, same challanges in the field of the fight against illegal migration,
2. Opportunity to disseminate experiences of the establishment of organisations in conformity with EU standards,
3. Pooling expertise,
4. Creation of professional relations of experts, strengthening good neighbourhood practice.
Why is the composition of participating states of the Söderköping Process very
appropriate?
22
EU Schengen2007
2004.05.01
HATÁRŐRSÉGHATÁRŐRSÉG
23
2004.05.01
HATÁRŐRSÉGHATÁRŐRSÉG
Thank You for Your Attention