09-09-18 Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) and Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) - Declaration of Joseph Zernik in Re Visit to US District Court Los Angeles s

8/14/2019 09-09-18 Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) and Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) - Declaration of Joseph Zernik i

1/10

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DECLARATION OF JOSEPH ZERNIK

IN RE: SEPT 18, 2009 VISIT TO US DIST CRT LA-1-

Joseph ZernikPO Box 526La Verne, California 91750Tel: 323 515 4583Fax: 801-998-0917

Email: [email protected]

This page was deliberately left blank.

Digitally signed by

Joseph H Zernik

DN: cn=Joseph H

Zernik, o, ou,

email=jz12345@earthl

ink.net, c=US

Location: La Verne,

California

Date: 2010.01.03

23:56:31 -08'00'


2/10

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28



DECLARATION OF JOSEPH H ZERNIK

IN RE: September 18, 2009 visit to the United States District Court Los Angeles.

I, JOSEPH H ZERNIK, hereby declare as follows:

This declaration was written as a memorandum of my September 18, 2009 visit to the US District

Court, Los Angeles. I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth herein, which I know to be

true and correct, except as to those matters therein stated as based upon information and belief, and

as to to those matters, I believe them to be true and correct as well. If called as a witness, I could

and would competently testify with respect thereto.

1. My visit to the US District Court, Los Angeles, Office of the Clerk, Records Deparatment was

part of my ongoing efforts for at least two and a half years, to exercise in various courts my right

pursuant to the First Amendment to the United States Constitution andNixon v Warner

Communications, Inc (1978) to access court records to inspect and to copy.

2. During that visit I presented the Deputy Clerk of duty, who stated his name was Eddy Ramirez,

with a written request to access court records to inspect and to copy - in my case Zernik v

Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) and in the case of Richard Fine Fine v Sheriff(2:09-cv-01914).

3. Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of the letter request that I presented to Mr Eddy Ramirez.

4. Mr Ramirez impressed my copy of the letter with the stamp Received".

5. I also presented Mr Ramirez with the request to access court papers by completing the paper

forms that were provided by the Office of the Clerk for that purpose.


3/10

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28



6. Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of the completed paper forms that I submitted to Mr Eddy

Ramirez as part of my request to access court records to inspect and to copy.

7. My requests pertained to two cases of the United States Court, Central District of California, Lo

Angeles:

a) Joseph Zernik v Jacqueline Connoret al (2:08-cv-01550) - where I sued some 10 judges

of the LA Superior Court, Attorney David Pasternak, Countrywide's Chief Legal Officer

Sandor Samuels and CEO Angelo Mozilo for what was claimed to amount to

racketeering. I believed that the US Court subjected me to a sham court action in the case

and that none of the orders and also the judgment were honest, valid, and effectual court

papers. Instead they were void, not voidable.

b) Richard Fine v Sheriff Department of Los Angeles County (2:09-cv-01914) - the habeas

corpus petition of Richard Fine. I believed that the US Court subjected Richard Fine to a

sham court action in the case, and that none of the orders and also the judgment were

honest, valid, and effectual court papers. Instead they were void, not voidable.

8. In both cases I had also previously filed complaints regarding alleged adulteration of records file

in court on paper by pro se filers.

9. During the September 18, 2009 visit, I was denied access to all records, which I requested access

to. Access to paper records was denied on September 18, 2009, under the claim that the paper

records had already been shredded. However, when I requested access to the court records,

documenting the claimed shredding, such access was denied.

10. Access to no records whatsoever was gained during the visit of September 18, 2009.

11. Attached to this declaration are:

Exhibit 1: September 18, 2009 Request by Joseph Zernik to access court records, stamped

Received and inscribed with the name of Eddy Ramirez by the Deputy Clerk of duty.

Exhibit 2: September 18, 2009 Request by Joseph Zernik to access court records, using


4/10

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28



forms provided by the Office of the Clerk.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California and the United States that

the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 3rd

day in January, 2010, in Los Angeles county,

California.

Joseph H Zernik

By_________________

JOSEPH H ZERNIK

PO Box 526, La Verne, California 91750

Tel: (323) 515-4583

Fax:(801) 998-0917


5/10

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28


IN RE: DEC 29, 2009 VISIT TO US DIST CRT LA

EXHIBIT 1


6/10

luBprguppol0L s6pBss

loN

, 066, :P

'aiqs=:7 ''l

l q{

t*tiiI

VHA5 I

TCT ,s C, GH$A

leu0

'8Lc

L: !x0 tq

:"

Hq

AssNu ,uluoe .HsnfH(pp

I*u6

6!ed:e

'e{spAuouo

$^Jauin SSVNVoNAOouopBL

9ey7le/6 'e'goH{

6


7/10 4\t

f,II*

.

xI BR{iOS te

flS $d,sr

rJ 'qtW

Documents

09-09-18 Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) and Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) - Declaration of Joseph Zernik in Re Visit to US District Court Los Angeles s