08-02-29 Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) Dr Zernik's Filing - Countrywide in Samaan v Zernik -s

8/9/2019 08-02-29 Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) Dr Zernik's Filing - Countrywide in Samaan v Zernik -s

1/9

1 II Joseph Zernikin proper2 11 2415 Saint George StLos Angeles, California 900273 II Tel: 310-435-9107Fax: 801-998-0917

Digitally signed by

J0 5ePh Joseph ZernikDN: cn=Joseph Zernik.email=Jz12345@earthlZ .k ink.net, c=U5ern I Date: 2008.02.2811:31:06 -OS'OO'

456789

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIAFOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

10 II NIVIE SAMAAN, an individual,1112 v.

Plaintiff,Case No. SC087400No Valid Assignment On File Since Sept 10,2007!

13 II JOSEPH ZERNIK, an individual, and DOES 114 II through 20, inclusive,

16 II JOSEPH ZERNIK, an individual,15

1718 v.

Defendants.

Cross-Complainant,

DEFENDANT & CROSSCOMPLAINANT ZERNIK'SNOTICE OF DOCUMENT:COUNTRYWIDE

INSAMAAN V ZERNIK

19 II COLDWELL BANKER RESIDENTIAL20 II BROKERAGE; MICHAEL LIBOW, an

individual,2122232425262728

Cross-Defendants.

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSELS OF RECORD:PLEASE TAKENOTICE OF THE DOCUMENT IN EXHIBIT A TITLED:

COUNTRYWIDE IN SAMAAN V ZERNIK. This document largely consists of data

NonCE OF DOCUMENT: COUNTRYWIDE IN SAMAAN V ZERNlK

Digitally signedby Joseph ZernikDN:cn=Joseph

Zernik,o,ou,[email protected],c=USDate:2010.05.1214:51:00 +03'00'


2/9

1 II compiled from court file in Samaan v Zernik (SC087400).2 II The document in Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the document first included as an3 II exhibit in Wri t filed Feb 13,2008.45 II Dated: Feb 29,20086789

10111213

141516171819202122232425262728

Submitted by:JOSEPH ZERNIK

. : > . ~

JOSEPH ZERNIKDefendant and Cross Complainantin pro per

-2-ZERNIK'S NOTICE OF DOCUMENT: COUNTRYWIDE IN SAMAAN V ZERNIK


3/9

V ~ I H I H X : t l


4/9

\....... \...-.-

COUNTRYWIDE IN SAMAAN V ZERNIK - COMPILATION OF DATAI. Nature of the Case:

Formally - Real Property Rights, a real estate dispute between Samaan and ZemikIn Fact - Countrywide is the dominant entity in this case..

I I . At a Glance Total pages filed by Countrywide so far (rough conservative estimate) - Total number of different party designations for Countrywide listed below -

3,00012

Number of judges whose disqualification openly involved Countrywide so far - 4 Estimated personal annual income of Sandor Samuels - Party in Interest - many millions Estimated personal annual income of Angelo Mozilo - Party in Interest - many millions Value of the real property in question, or its ownership to Countrywide, Samuels, and/or

Mozilo -None Damages to Countrywide from the publication Jan 8, 2008 of one case of filing fraudulent

documents in court - -Billions

m. Designations of Countrywide) in Court Papers, Lacking in Foundation1. Transcripts

Date Judge DesignationAug 9,2007 Connor CountrywideAug 2, 2007 Segal PlaintiffAug 1,2007 Segal PlaintiffJuly 23, 2007 Connor Defendant

- 23 -

WRIT PETITION ZERNIK V LAseEXHIBIT PAGE 267


5/9

\.---

2. Minute OrdersDate Judge Designation

Jan 15,2008 Friedman None S(Counttywide's counsel listed asfor defendant Zernik, Countrywide is notmentioned by name)

Dec 26 , 2007 Rosenberg -6Dec 17,2007 Friedman -

Dec 7, 2007 Collins -7Dec 7, 2007 Hart-Cole -8Dec 4,20079 Segal Intervenor, Defendant, "not

a paTty", "a witness"Nov 21, 2007 Segal -

Nov 14,2007 Segal TntervenorNov 9, 2007 Segal Intervenor

Nov 5, 2007 Segal TntervenorOct 26,2007 Segal TntervenorOct 23,2007 Segal IntervenorOct 17,2007 Segal TntervenorOct 16,2007 Goodman -Oct 11,2007 Segal IntervenorOct 10,2007 Segal IntervenorOct 5, 2007 Biderman -Oct 3, 2007 Goodman -Sept 20, 2007 Goodman -Sept 17, 2007 Goodman -Setp 11, 2007 Goodman -Sept 10, 2007 Connor -Setp OS, 2007 Connor -Aug 30, 2007 Connor -Aug 21, 2007 Connor -Aug 14,2007 Connor -Aug 09, 2007 Connor Defendant 10 (Countrywide's

1Countrywide here designates CFC, Inc, and/or any and all of its subsidiaries and affiliates jointly and/or severally6 "." under designation indicates that neither Countrywide nor its counsel were listed in this document.7 In this ex parte appearance, heard in Santa Monica Courthouse following a 30 minute advance notice in the Beverly Hills Courthouse, counsel forMara Escrow/Old Republic Title was listed with no designation at all. In this hearing a substantial decision to the benefit of his client was decided bythe judge ex parte, inthe absence of a legal file, and base on complex, over 100 pages of financial documents, that there was no wayshe could haveread or comprehended in that rushed procedure, started around 11 :4Sarn and ended aroulld 12: 15. [n this ex parte appearance a gag order was alsogranted against Defendant Zernik.8 [n this appearance counsel for another large corporate client-a s it later turned out for Mara Escrow/Old Republic Title - appearcd incognito. BothJudge Hart-Cole and the Counsel (R OmlOnd) refused to have him identified by narne or by parly represented.9 One table row perdocument, here multiple conflicting designations in same document.4Countrywide here designates CFC, Inc, and/or any and aU of its subsidiaries and affiliates jointly and/or severally

- 24-

WRIT PETITION ZERNIK V LASCEXHIBIT PAGE 268


6/9

counsel listed as for DefendantZemik,CounlJVWide is not mentioned by name)July 27, 2007 Connor -July 12, 2007 Connor -July 6, 2007 Connor Non-party (in court scheduleCountrywide was listed as Plaintiffon thatday.)March 28, 2007 Connor -

3. Sustain - Case HistoryThe Court's case management system. Defacto the governing system in the Court today.Accessible only from terminals on-location. User i l l and true date stamps, as well as otherpertinent data are concealed from the public at large, visible only to court staff, deemed"privileged". Obviously neither Judge Connor nor Supervising Judge Rosenberg expected thatDefendant Zemik ever be able to view such data.

Date Judge DesignationDec 28, 2007 Friedman Defendant, IntervenorDec 13,200711 Friedman Defendant, IntervenorDec 13,2007 Friedman Defendant, Non-Party,Intervenor, Cross-

ComplainantDec 13,2007 Friedman Non-PartyDec 13,2007 Friedman Defendant, IntervenorDec 13,2007 Friedman Defendant, IntervenorDec 13,2007 Friedman Defendant, Non-Party,IntervenorDec 13,2007 Friedman Defendant, IntervenorDec 13,2007 Friedman Defendant, IntervenorDec 12,200712 Friedman DefendantDec 12,2007 Friedman Non-PartyDec 12,2007 Friedman DefendantIntervenorDec 12,2007 Friedman Cross-Defendant

IntervenorDefendant

Dec 7, 2007 Hart-Cole Non-Party11 Multiple entries in Sustain on Dec 13,2007 - one table row per entry.)2 Multiple entries on Dec 12,2007

- 25 -

WRIT PETITION ZERNIK V LASeEXHIBIT PAGE 269


7/9

"--'

Aug 1,2007 Segal IntervenorJuly 27, 2007 Connor IntervenorJuly 24, 2007 Connor Objector 13July 16,2007 Connor Moving PartyJuly 11,2007 Connor Moving PartyJuly 6, 2007 Connor Moving Party14

Non- PartyJuly 24, 2007 Connor IntervenorJuly 24, 200415 Anonymous Real Parties [sic-jz] in(July 24, 2007) (Connor) Interest

4. CourtNet - Case Summary - "Parties" SectionThe court's web-based, public-access system, deemed error-prone and lacking in

authority. Effectively, the public's only access to electronic file data in West District

Date Judee DesienationDec 28, 2007 Friedman Defendant, IntervenorNov 18.2007 Segal Intervenor, but failing tomention Countrywide by

name, as done for all otherparties.Oct 25, 2007 Segal Same as aboveSept 8, 2007 Connor Same as aboveAug 29,2007 Connor Same as aboveJuly 17,2007 Connor No mention of eitherCountrywide or their

counsels at a time they havealready filed motion forprotective (gag) order

13 The designation Objector was used in context where it was never used for other parties, in lieu of designation such as plaintiffor defendant, andwithout mentioning Countrywide by name, making it practically impossible to identify the actual entity thus designated.14 The designation Moving Party or MIP was used in context where it was never used for other parties, in lieu of designation such as plaintiffordefendant15 Incomprehensibly, Sustain as operated in West District allowed backdating of entries, and such were often practiced by the Court of JudgeConnor. Such back-dating is concealed from the public, but is easily marked on the screens as seen by court personnel. Zernik's requeststo obtainfull Sustain datawere routinely denied by Supervising Judge Rosenberg. Regardless, Zemik obtained documentary evidence for the backdating ofthis note, where the real date of entry is 7124/07, shortly prior to Judge Connor's departureon summer vacation. Back-dating here guaranteedprominent appearanceof this noteon page 1 of Case History, therefore, instantly visible to anybody handling the case. The identity of the writer isalso concealed in the printout provided to the public, but visible to court staff

- 26-


8/9

'---

4. Courtnet - Case Summary - "Documents Filed" SectionThe court's web-based, public-access system, deemed error-prone and lacking in

authority. Effectively, the public's only access to electronic file data in West District.Date Judge Designation

Nov 15,2007 Segal Moving PartyJuly 24, 2007 Connor IntervenorJuly 16, 2007 Connor Moving Party16July 11,2007 Connor Moving PartyJuly 6,2007 Connor Plaintiff

16 In a context where such designation is never used for any other party.

- 27-


9/9

4) Party in InterestCA Attorney GeneralRE: Countrywide1300 "I' streetSAC, CA 958145) Parties in InterestSandor Samuels, CountrywideArt Moldawsky and Amberg120 Broadway, Suite 300Santa Monica, CA 90406) Party in InterestCalifornia Commission on JudicialPerformanceRE: Countrywide: Beyond FinancialRecklessness - Corruption of the Courts455 Golden Gate Avenue Suite 14400SF, C A 941027) Party in InterestF BI L os Angeles, RE: Countrywide11000 Wilshire blvd fob 17th floorLos Angeles, CA 90024

Name (print)

Proof of ServiceI, Mera Khoury , declare as follows:I am over eighteen (18) years of age and not a par ty to the within action. My businessaddress is 1965 Foo t h i l l Blvd, La Verne, CA 91750On Feb 29, 2008, I caused to be served the within:NOTICE OF DOCUMENT: COUNTRYWIDE IN SAMAAN V ZERNIKon each of the following, by placing a true copy thereof in a sealed envelope, addressedas follows, to be personally delivered to each addressee mail prior tofiling with the LA Superior Court :1) Los Angeles Superior CourtWest Judicial District1725 Main StreetSantaMonica, CA 904012) Party in Interest SamaanMohammad KeshavarziSheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton333 South Hope Street, 48th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90071-14483) Party in InterestLibow & Coldwell BankerRobert 1. ShulkinThe Law DepartmentColdwell Banker Residential.11611 San Vicente Blvd., Ninth FloorLos Angeles, CA 90049-6510

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that I signedthis declaration on ~ ~ S ; Los Angeles, CalifOrnia') } JMera K h o u ~ }L ~ _

-11Signature