2
Before arthroplasty yes Allergy yes Allergy no no No (prophetic) allergy test Consider “hypoallergenic” implant material “Standard” implant material History of hypersensitivity to metals or potential bone cement components Allergy (patch) test with metals and bone cement components Flowchart for the evaluation of potential allergy prior to primary arthroplasty (for details, see text) Flowchart for the evaluation of potential allergy in arthroplasty with complications (for details, see text) Arthroplasty with complications no/suspicion of allergy (after exclusion of infection) Allergy yes Allergy no suggestive of hyper- sensitivity other pathology positive yes Plan treatment accordingly Allergy diagnostics Patch test Histology Integrate history, clinical picture and diagnostic findings to verify potential allergy Detection of “conventional” elicitors LTT* *) Lymphocyte transformation test can be performed in parallel. Until now for scientific purposes, clinical significance has to be evaluated case by case Clinical Algorithm © Copyright: Peter Thomas, MD, PhD and Burkhard Summer, PhD, Clinic for Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig Maximilians-University Munich

02 Beilage Thomas - CeramTec...Histopathological endoprosthesis particle algorith m Micro abrasio n par ticles Po lymeth yl methaacr ylate (PMM A) ≈ 0.1–2 mm Po ly eth ylene (PE)

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 02 Beilage Thomas - CeramTec...Histopathological endoprosthesis particle algorith m Micro abrasio n par ticles Po lymeth yl methaacr ylate (PMM A) ≈ 0.1–2 mm Po ly eth ylene (PE)

Before arthroplasty

yes

Allergy yes Allergy no

no

No (prophetic) allergy test

Consider “hypoallergenic”implant material

“Standard” implant material

History of hypersensitivity to metalsor potential bone cement

components

Allergy (patch) test with metalsand bone cement components

Flowchart for the evaluation of potential allergy prior to primary arthroplasty (for details, see text)

Flowchart for the evaluation of potential allergy in arthroplasty with complications (for details, see text)

Arthroplasty with complications

no/suspicion of allergy(after exclusion of infection)

Allergy yes

Allergyno

suggestive ofhyper-

sensitivity

otherpathology positive

yes

Plan treatment accordinglyAllergy diagnostics

Patch test Histology

Integrate history, clinical picture and diagnostic findings to verify potential allergy

Detection of “conventional” elicitors

LTT**) Lymphocyte transformation test can be performed in parallel.Until now for scientific purposes,clinical significance has to be evaluated case by case

Clinical Algorithm

© Copyright: Peter Thomas, MD, PhD and Burkhard Summer, PhD, Clinic for Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig Maximilians-University Munich

Page 2: 02 Beilage Thomas - CeramTec...Histopathological endoprosthesis particle algorith m Micro abrasio n par ticles Po lymeth yl methaacr ylate (PMM A) ≈ 0.1–2 mm Po ly eth ylene (PE)

His

topa

thol

ogic

al e

ndop

rost

hesi

s pa

rtic

le a

lgor

ithm

Mic

ro a

bras

ion

part

icle

s

Poly

met

hyl m

etha

acry

late

(PM

MA

) ≈ 0

.1–2

mm

Poly

ethy

lene

(PE)

mac

ro p

arti

cula

te ≥

1 m

m, P

OL

++

+Ce

ram

ic m

acro

par

ticl

e –

in p

rost

hesi

s fr

actu

res ≥

1 m

m P

OL

+/–

Silic

one

part

icle

≈ 0

.5–2

2 m

m P

OL

+/–

Carb

on fi

ber ≥

3 m

m P

OL

POL

+/–

Oil

Red

O –

BBR

–PO

L +

+

Mic

ropa

rtic

ular

PE

<1

µm (o

il re

d ++

)

Met

allic

non

-fer

rous

par

ticl

esbl

acki

sh/in

tens

ely

blac

k ≈

1 µm

Tita

nium

Coba

ltN

icke

l**

Chro

miu

mM

olyb

denu

mTa

ntal

umZi

rcon

ium

Nio

bium

Bari

um s

ulfa

teZi

rcon

ium

dio

xide

Pure

met

al a

nd/o

r allo

ysan

d su

rfac

e co

atin

gs

X-ra

y co

nstr

ast m

edia

(add

itive

to P

MM

A)

Part

icle

cor

rosi

onCo

balt,

mol

ybde

num

, chr

omiu

m (B

BR-)

Solid

pre

cipa

tes:

Oxi

des,

chlo

rides

, pho

spha

tes a

nd o

ther

sYe

llow

ish

to g

reen

ish,

0.5

µg–

0.5

mm

Iron/

stee

l allo

y (B

BR+

), <

1 µg

–>0.

5 m

m

– ce

ram

ic ≈

0.2

µm

–1 µ

m b

row

nisc

h/gr

ay/li

ght

– A

lum

iniu

m o

xide

– Zi

rcon

ium

oxi

de–

Yttr

ium

oxi

de–

Nio

bium

oxi

de

Blee

ding

resi

dues

BBR

++

+H

emos

ider

in/ir

on g

ranu

lom

a <

1 µm

–>

0.5

mm

Gan

dy G

amna

bod

y ≈

0.5–

2 m

m

Crys

tal d

epos

itio

nCP

PA (c

alci

um p

yrop

hosp

hate

) PO

L +

+, ≈

0.1

µm

Ura

te <

50 µ

m–>

3 m

m, n

ativ

e: P

OL

++

Calc

areo

us d

epos

itsBa

sic

calc

ium

pho

spha

te <

1 µm

–>0.

5 m

mCa

lciu

m c

arbo

nate

(lim

e): P

OL

– ≥

1 m

mBo

ne tr

abec

ula

frag

men

ts: P

OL

– ≥

1 m

m

Non

-wea

r par

ticl

es

Mac

ro a

bras

ive

part

icle

s(p

artia

lly d

etac

hed,

che

mic

ally

or m

echa

nica

lly

Wea

r par

ticl

es B

BR –

© Copyright: Veit Krenn, MD, PhD, Center for Histology, Cytology and Molecular Diagnostics, Trier, Germany

Literature: Krenn V et al. (2014) Histopathologischer Partikelalgorithmus [Histopathological particle algorithm]. Z Rheumatol

73:639–649Krenn V et al. (2013) Update on endoprosthesis pathology: Particle algorithm for particle identification in the

SLIM. Sem Arthroplasty 24:265–275