Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Before arthroplasty
yes
Allergy yes Allergy no
no
No (prophetic) allergy test
Consider “hypoallergenic”implant material
“Standard” implant material
History of hypersensitivity to metalsor potential bone cement
components
Allergy (patch) test with metalsand bone cement components
Flowchart for the evaluation of potential allergy prior to primary arthroplasty (for details, see text)
Flowchart for the evaluation of potential allergy in arthroplasty with complications (for details, see text)
Arthroplasty with complications
no/suspicion of allergy(after exclusion of infection)
Allergy yes
Allergyno
suggestive ofhyper-
sensitivity
otherpathology positive
yes
Plan treatment accordinglyAllergy diagnostics
Patch test Histology
Integrate history, clinical picture and diagnostic findings to verify potential allergy
Detection of “conventional” elicitors
LTT**) Lymphocyte transformation test can be performed in parallel.Until now for scientific purposes,clinical significance has to be evaluated case by case
Clinical Algorithm
© Copyright: Peter Thomas, MD, PhD and Burkhard Summer, PhD, Clinic for Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig Maximilians-University Munich
His
topa
thol
ogic
al e
ndop
rost
hesi
s pa
rtic
le a
lgor
ithm
Mic
ro a
bras
ion
part
icle
s
Poly
met
hyl m
etha
acry
late
(PM
MA
) ≈ 0
.1–2
mm
Poly
ethy
lene
(PE)
mac
ro p
arti
cula
te ≥
1 m
m, P
OL
++
+Ce
ram
ic m
acro
par
ticl
e –
in p
rost
hesi
s fr
actu
res ≥
1 m
m P
OL
+/–
Silic
one
part
icle
≈ 0
.5–2
2 m
m P
OL
+/–
Carb
on fi
ber ≥
3 m
m P
OL
–
POL
+/–
Oil
Red
O –
BBR
–PO
L +
+
Mic
ropa
rtic
ular
PE
<1
µm (o
il re
d ++
)
Met
allic
non
-fer
rous
par
ticl
esbl
acki
sh/in
tens
ely
blac
k ≈
1 µm
Tita
nium
Coba
ltN
icke
l**
Chro
miu
mM
olyb
denu
mTa
ntal
umZi
rcon
ium
Nio
bium
Bari
um s
ulfa
teZi
rcon
ium
dio
xide
Pure
met
al a
nd/o
r allo
ysan
d su
rfac
e co
atin
gs
X-ra
y co
nstr
ast m
edia
(add
itive
to P
MM
A)
Part
icle
cor
rosi
onCo
balt,
mol
ybde
num
, chr
omiu
m (B
BR-)
Solid
pre
cipa
tes:
Oxi
des,
chlo
rides
, pho
spha
tes a
nd o
ther
sYe
llow
ish
to g
reen
ish,
0.5
µg–
0.5
mm
Iron/
stee
l allo
y (B
BR+
), <
1 µg
–>0.
5 m
m
– ce
ram
ic ≈
0.2
µm
–1 µ
m b
row
nisc
h/gr
ay/li
ght
– A
lum
iniu
m o
xide
– Zi
rcon
ium
oxi
de–
Yttr
ium
oxi
de–
Nio
bium
oxi
de
Blee
ding
resi
dues
BBR
++
+H
emos
ider
in/ir
on g
ranu
lom
a <
1 µm
–>
0.5
mm
Gan
dy G
amna
bod
y ≈
0.5–
2 m
m
Crys
tal d
epos
itio
nCP
PA (c
alci
um p
yrop
hosp
hate
) PO
L +
+, ≈
0.1
µm
Ura
te <
50 µ
m–>
3 m
m, n
ativ
e: P
OL
++
Calc
areo
us d
epos
itsBa
sic
calc
ium
pho
spha
te <
1 µm
–>0.
5 m
mCa
lciu
m c
arbo
nate
(lim
e): P
OL
– ≥
1 m
mBo
ne tr
abec
ula
frag
men
ts: P
OL
– ≥
1 m
m
Non
-wea
r par
ticl
es
Mac
ro a
bras
ive
part
icle
s(p
artia
lly d
etac
hed,
che
mic
ally
or m
echa
nica
lly
Wea
r par
ticl
es B
BR –
© Copyright: Veit Krenn, MD, PhD, Center for Histology, Cytology and Molecular Diagnostics, Trier, Germany
Literature: Krenn V et al. (2014) Histopathologischer Partikelalgorithmus [Histopathological particle algorithm]. Z Rheumatol
73:639–649Krenn V et al. (2013) Update on endoprosthesis pathology: Particle algorithm for particle identification in the
SLIM. Sem Arthroplasty 24:265–275