1
Measuring Gaseous Losses From Composting Hog Manure Separated Solids -Preliminary Data- Jolene Rutter and Mario Tenuta Soil Science Department, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg MB, R3T 2N2. In Manitoba manure management regulations have changed to a phosphorus-based application rate. This has producers interested in implementing manure separation techniques as a means to remove the phosphorus (P) stored in the separated solids (SS). However, a method that utilizes the low N:P separated solids is still required. Composting the SS is a method that concentrates the P into a smaller volume while stabilizing the nitrogen (N) losses, thus reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Larney et al., 2006). Additionally, applied compost can capitalize on nutrient supply and other value added benefits such as disease control in potatoes (Molina, 2010). Objectives: (a) Develop a method for mixing the SS with a carbon source and setup a compost windrow, (b) determine the gaseous losses during the composting of SS. Soil Ecology Laboratory at The University of Manitoba Biota Management Environment As the project progresses objectives include: a) Determine if altering the C:N has an effect on N flux b) Identify patterns of N losses throughout the composting process c) Determine what effects composting SS has on P and other physical properties Larney, F.J., Sullivan D.M., Buckley K.E., Eghball, B. 2006. The role of composting in recycling manure nutrients. Canadian Journal of Soil Science. 86(4):597-611 Molina, O.I. 2010. Effect of green manures and organic amendments on Verticillium wilt of potato in Manitoba. M.Sc. University of Manitoba For additional information or updates on current progress please contact Jolene Rutter at [email protected] Introduction Fig 4. LI-8100 and FTIR system Fig 5. LICOR long-term automated flux chamber Fig 1.Alfa Laval centrifuge Fig 2. Loading materials into fee d processor Fig 3. Brown Bear © turning windrow Fig 7. Compost windrow and GHG monitoring system A LI-8100 automated chamber system with a multiplexer (LICOR BioSciences) and Fourier Transform Infrared Radiation (FTIR) multi-gas analyzer (Gasmet DX4015) (Fig 4) is used in series to analyze the volumetric gas concentration of direct GHG’s: a) Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 ) b) Methane (CH 4 ) c) Nitrous oxide (N 2 O) and indirect GHG’s: d) Nitrogen Dioxide (NO 2 ) e) Ammonia (NH 3 ) LICOR long-term automated flux chambers are used to collect gas samples from the compost (Fig 5). A pump moves air continuously in a loop from the headspace of the chamber through to the LI-8100 and FTIR analyzers and back out to the chamber headspace. The analysis from the FTIR during the observation is used to calculate the flux rate. The ideal gas law converts the volumetric concentration to the mass. It is then divided by the chamber area. From this, the flux rate is determined by the linear regression slope of μg m -2 versus time. The GHG monitoring system includes 8 long-term automated flux chambers, set-up on top of the windrow (Fig 7). DOY vs N2O DOY vs N2O DOY (Oct 2-4, 2011) 274.0 274.5 275.0 275.5 276.0 276.5 277.0 NH 3 Flux (ug N / m 2 / s) -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Figure 8. Sample of flux rates from in-process composting. Feedstock mixed on Sept 19, 2011 Methods: Compost Development An Alfa Laval centrifuge separates the solids from the liquid hog manure (Fig 1). Feedstock material, SS and wheat straw are combined and mixed in a feed processor (Fig 2) to the ideal composting conditions of C:N of 25:1 and water is added to top the moisture content up to 65% (Larney et al., 2006). A Brown Bear © compost turner (Fig 3) turns the windrow in order to maintain the optimal conditions for enhancing the biological decomposition process. The conditions monitored include: Temperature: > 30ºC Moisture Content: 45-65% Oxygen Content: > 13% Methods: GHG Measurement CO 2 Flux (ug C / m 2 / s) 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 N 2 O Flux (ug N / m 2 / s) -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 Results: GHG Flux Rates Future Research References Fig 6. Observation sequence. Photo courtesy LICOR BIOSCIENCE NO 2 Flux (ug N / m 2 / s) -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 CH 4 Flux (ug C / m 2 / s) -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 (b) (a) (c) (d) (e) Once the chamber is deployed the observation begins. Emissions from the compost build up in the headspace. The observation length is 3 minutes. Followed by a 7.5 minute post-purge and 8.5 minute pre-purge of the next chamber (Fig 6). During the composting process CO 2 is the highest and most frequent flux emitter (Fig 8a).

s) Measuring Gaseous Losses From Composting Hog ...DOY (Oct 2-4, 2011) 274.0 274.5 275.0 275.5 276.0 276.5 277.0 NH 3 / m 2 / s)-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Figure 8. Sample of flux rates

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Measuring Gaseous Losses From Composting Hog Manure Separated Solids -Preliminary Data- Jolene Rutter and Mario Tenuta

    Soil Science Department, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg MB, R3T 2N2.

    In Manitoba manure management regulations have

    changed to a phosphorus-based application rate. This has

    producers interested in implementing manure separation

    techniques as a means to remove the phosphorus (P) stored

    in the separated solids (SS). However, a method that utilizes

    the low N:P separated solids is still required.

    Composting the SS is a method that concentrates the P into

    a smaller volume while stabilizing the nitrogen (N) losses,

    thus reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Larney et al.,

    2006). Additionally, applied compost can capitalize on

    nutrient supply and other value added benefits such as

    disease control in potatoes (Molina, 2010).

    Objectives: (a) Develop a method for mixing the SS with a

    carbon source and setup a compost windrow, (b) determine

    the gaseous losses during the composting of SS.

    Soil Ecology Laboratory at The University of Manitoba

    Biota

    Management

    Environment

    As the project progresses objectives include:

    a) Determine if altering the C:N has an effect on N flux

    b) Identify patterns of N losses throughout the composting

    process

    c) Determine what effects composting SS has on P and

    other physical properties

    Larney, F.J., Sullivan D.M., Buckley K.E., Eghball, B. 2006. The role of composting in recycling

    manure nutrients. Canadian Journal of Soil Science. 86(4):597-611

    Molina, O.I. 2010. Effect of green manures and organic amendments on Verticillium wilt of potato in

    Manitoba. M.Sc. University of Manitoba

    For additional information or updates on current progress please contact Jolene Rutter at [email protected]

    Introduction

    Fig 4. LI-8100 and FTIR system

    Fig 5. LICOR long-term automated flux chamber

    Fig 1.Alfa Laval centrifuge

    Fig 2. Loading materials into fee d processor

    Fig 3. Brown Bear © turning windrow

    Fig 7. Compost windrow and GHG monitoring system

    A LI-8100 automated chamber system with

    a multiplexer (LICOR BioSciences) and

    Fourier Transform Infrared Radiation (FTIR)

    multi-gas analyzer (Gasmet DX4015) (Fig 4)

    is used in series to analyze the volumetric gas

    concentration of direct GHG’s:

    a) Carbon Dioxide (CO2)

    b) Methane (CH4)

    c) Nitrous oxide (N2O)

    and indirect GHG’s:

    d) Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2 )

    e) Ammonia (NH3)

    LICOR long-term automated flux

    chambers are used to collect gas

    samples from the compost (Fig 5). A

    pump moves air continuously in a

    loop from the headspace of the

    chamber through to the LI-8100 and

    FTIR analyzers and back out to the

    chamber headspace.

    The analysis from the FTIR during

    the observation is used to calculate the

    flux rate. The ideal gas law converts

    the volumetric concentration to the

    mass. It is then divided by the

    chamber area. From this, the flux rate

    is determined by the linear regression

    slope of μg m-2 versus time.

    The GHG monitoring system includes

    8 long-term automated flux chambers,

    set-up on top of the windrow (Fig 7).

    DOY vs N2O DOY vs N2O

    DOY (Oct 2-4, 2011)

    274.0 274.5 275.0 275.5 276.0 276.5 277.0

    NH3 F

    lux (u

    g N / m

    2 / s)

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    Figure 8. Sample of flux rates from in-process composting. Feedstock mixed on Sept 19, 2011

    Methods: Compost Development An Alfa Laval centrifuge

    separates the solids from the

    liquid hog manure (Fig 1).

    Feedstock material, SS

    and wheat straw are

    combined and mixed in a

    feed processor (Fig 2) to the

    ideal composting conditions

    of C:N of 25:1 and water is

    added to top the moisture

    content up to 65% (Larney et

    al., 2006).

    A Brown Bear © compost

    turner (Fig 3) turns the

    windrow in order to maintain

    the optimal conditions for

    enhancing the biological

    decomposition process.

    The conditions monitored

    include:

    Temperature: > 30ºC

    Moisture Content: 45-65%

    Oxygen Content: > 13%

    Methods: GHG Measurement

    CO2

    Flux

    (ug

    C / m

    2 / s

    )

    0

    2000

    4000

    6000

    8000

    N 2O

    Flu

    x (u

    g N

    / m2 /

    s)

    -0.5

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    Results: GHG Flux Rates

    Future Research

    References

    Fig 6. Observation sequence. Photo courtesy LICOR BIOSCIENCE

    NO2

    Flux

    (ug

    N / m

    2 / s

    )

    -0.6

    -0.4

    -0.2

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    CH4 F

    lux

    (ug

    C / m

    2 / s

    )

    -4

    -3

    -2

    -1

    0

    1

    2

    3

    (b)

    (a)

    (c)

    (d)

    (e)

    Once the chamber is deployed

    the observation begins. Emissions

    from the compost build up in the

    headspace. The observation

    length is 3 minutes. Followed by

    a 7.5 minute post-purge and 8.5

    minute pre-purge of the next

    chamber (Fig 6).

    During the composting process CO2 is the highest and

    most frequent flux emitter (Fig 8a).