10
ཎⴭ ⥲ᰝ63, 㛤Ⓨ⤒⦋ ᖺ௦ᖺ௦ᑐ㇟ ᐑ♸ ᪥ᮏᕤᴗᏛᕤᏛ㒊 せ⣙㸸ᮏㄽ┠ࡢ᪂つᏛ༞⪅᥇⏝ヨ㦂࠸࠾ᖜᗈ⥲ᰝSPI ࡢࡑ㛤Ⓨ⤒ࡢ⦋⌮ㄽⓗ᰿ᣐࡓࡗ࡞ᚰ⌮Ꮫ▱ࡢ㆑↷ⓗ⌮ࡇࡢࡑࠋ1960ᖺ௦1990ᖺ௦SPI ᬑཬ ࡓࡋ4⏤⌮ࡢࡘ1 㸪ᴗ➼࠸ࡀ⏤⮬ࠕᛂເࡇࡓ⫼ᬒ ࡢࡃᛂເ⪅୰㐺ࡓࡋேᮦຠ⋡Ⰻ㑅ᢤࡅ࡞ࡋ࡞ࡤࡇࡓࡗ➨ࠋ2 ⾜⛉Ꮫ▱ࡢᴗ⤒Ⴀ⏝ࡇࡓࡗ࠶ࡀ➨ࠋ3㸪᥇⏝ᢸᙜ⪅SPI ⤖ࡢࡇ࠺ᚰ⌮ⓗၥ㢟࠶ࡀࡉ࡞ே㑅ศ㝿㸪⛉Ꮫ ⤖ࡢ࠺࠸ṇᙜࡇࡓࡗ࠶ᚋ㸪㠃᥋ヨ㦂SPI ⤖ࡢά⏝ࡇࡓࡁࡘࠋ㸪㠃᥋⪅ᛂເ⪅SPI ⤖ࡢ㉁ၥෆᐜㄪ ࠋࡓࡗ࠶㸸㛤Ⓨ㸪⫋㐙⾜⬟ຊ㸪ᚰ⌮ᰝ㸧 The historical development of the synthetic personality inventory ɆɆ Focusing on the 1960s-1990s ɆɆ Yu Ninomiya Faculty of Engineering, Nippon Institute of Technology Abstract: The purpose of this article was to summarize the development process of the Synthetic Personality Inventory (SPI) in the point of view of a knowledge of psychology. The SPI came into widespread use in recruitment examinations for university students and vocational college students from the 1960s through the 1990s. There are four reasons. Firstly, employers had to select qualified people from a large pool of applicants effectively. Applicant numbers were increasing rapidly since university student and vocational college student populations surged at the time. In addition, students became able to apply freely any kind of job offer. Secondly, behavioral sciences tended to be applied to business administration and management. Most business managers trusted the SPI, as it was founded on applied psychology. Thirdly, some hiring staff could eliminate mentally handicapped applicants by using the SPI results and justify it by claiming of scientific results. Finally, the SPI could be utilized in an individual interview examination. In other words, some interviewers could adjust the questions according to the SPI results of an applicant. − 21 −

)r è 63, b6ä$Î) ) - Tokushima U...3) $× ¥ ¥>&E>

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    8

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: )r è 63, b6ä$Î) ) - Tokushima U...3) $× ¥ ¥>&E>

SPI

1960 1990 SPI41

23

SPISPI

SPI

The historical development of the synthetic personality inventoryFocusing on the 1960s-1990s

Yu Ninomiya

Faculty of Engineering, Nippon Institute of Technology

Abstract: The purpose of this article was to summarize the development process of the

Synthetic Personality Inventory (SPI) in the point of view of a knowledge of psychology. The SPI

came into widespread use in recruitment examinations for university students and vocational

college students from the 1960s through the 1990s. There are four reasons.

Firstly, employers had to select qualified people from a large pool of applicants effectively.

Applicant numbers were increasing rapidly since university student and vocational college

student populations surged at the time. In addition, students became able to apply freely any

kind of job offer. Secondly, behavioral sciences tended to be applied to business

administration and management. Most business managers trusted the SPI, as it was founded on

applied psychology. Thirdly, some hiring staff could eliminate mentally handicapped

applicants by using the SPI results and justify it by claiming of scientific results. Finally, the SPI

could be utilized in an individual interview examination. In other words, some interviewers

could adjust the questions according to the SPI results of an applicant.

− 21 −

Page 2: )r è 63, b6ä$Î) ) - Tokushima U...3) $× ¥ ¥>&E>

(Keywords: career development, job performance, psychological test)

1

1)

2)

3)

SPI Synthetic Personality Inventory1)

SPISPI

SPI

3 SPI3SPI

1 SPI

− 22 −

Page 3: )r è 63, b6ä$Î) ) - Tokushima U...3) $× ¥ ¥>&E>

GATB General Aptitude Test Battery

SPI

SPI

SPI

SPI

1920

4)

5)

6)

7)

1960

GATBYG

8)

2)

SPI

4 1

23

4

9)

L. L. Thurstone7

− 23 −

Page 4: )r è 63, b6ä$Î) ) - Tokushima U...3) $× ¥ ¥>&E>

SPI 4

1 1940MMPI Minnesota Multiphasic Personality

InventoryMMPI

1950 1960

10)

SPIMMPI

11)

MMPI

12) MMPI

MMPI

3) 13 524MMPI 12 120

YG

(1)(2)

(3) etc.

RPI13) RPI

SORE AC PECA 5

NE DEEW IN OA

HM 6 11

�1 4�����������1�����14)

S N

T F F T

IJ ISTJ ISFJ INFJ INTJ

P ISTP ISFP INFP INTP

EP ESTP ESFP ENFP ENTP

J ESTJ ESFJ ENFJ ENTJ

I Introversion E Extroversion S Sensing

Intuition T Thinking F Feeling

J Judging P Perception

2 1962 MBTIMyers-Briggs Type Indicator -

MBTI C. G. Jung

2

815) MBTI 3

116 MBTI

16,17)

TISPI 16

RPI TI

GATAM VI 2

RMI1974 SPI 2 1970

SPIMBTI

− 24 −

Page 5: )r è 63, b6ä$Î) ) - Tokushima U...3) $× ¥ ¥>&E>

1 3SPI

SPI

18)

SPI

1

SPI

19)

SPI

1960

20)

SPI

TI IE 22

257

21)

�2 �������������������22)

�����������

AU

AH

AG

R100

RK400

A

WAIS

17

70

70

70

25

60

40

45

BS

CA

MR

PA

16

20

40

30

75

50

30

30

100

MAT

MB

MS

21

16

16

80

45

55

RPI

TI

RMI

16

17

18

17

50

30

35

30

− 25 −

Page 6: )r è 63, b6ä$Î) ) - Tokushima U...3) $× ¥ ¥>&E>

MMPI

TPI

TAT)

17

17

17

2

60

60

30

20

30

60

90

30

23) 1960

19704)

5)

SPI

24)

SPI

25)

26)

27)

SPI GAT

1973

16ESTJ

ENTJ

28)

SPI

1960

29)

SPISPI

− 26 −

Page 7: )r è 63, b6ä$Î) ) - Tokushima U...3) $× ¥ ¥>&E>

11980

SPI30)

10 5,000SPI

2,00022 SPI

422 4 8 8 1980

40 11

22 SPI6)

SPI

7)

1976 SPI47

79 198967 64 31) SPI

SPI

32)

SPISPI MMPI

1633)

SPI1990

34)

1993 1

SPI

SPI

SPI

B5 50

SPISPI

35)

SPI

SPI

SPI

− 27 −

Page 8: )r è 63, b6ä$Î) ) - Tokushima U...3) $× ¥ ¥>&E>

SPI

SPI1990

SPI

2 11970 SPI

SPI

36) SPI

37)

22000 SPI

SPI SPI

SPI3

5

SPI

1) SPI

2)

100YG 15

WAIT What Am I Test10

9 5

38)

39)

− 28 −

Page 9: )r è 63, b6ä$Î) ) - Tokushima U...3) $× ¥ ¥>&E>

40)

3) MMPI

41)

4)

5) SCT Sentence

Completion Test

A

42)

6) SPI 2

2

21

43)

7) 198445

SPI44 SPI

1)

20002)

20003)

20104)

20115)

20106)

11(1) 58-681973

7) 19903

87-1052010

8)21

37-64 19979)

1

1963(1) 16-20 196310)

MMPI-1/MINI/MINI-124

200911) MMPI

3 30 196412) MMPI

4 48 196413)

RPI

9 180-187 196714)

MBTI17 316-321 1965

15) Jung, Carl Gustav, 1921, Psychologische Typen, Zurich, Rascher.

− 29 −

Page 10: )r è 63, b6ä$Î) ) - Tokushima U...3) $× ¥ ¥>&E>

198716)

MBTI 48 228-231

196617)

MBTI

8 232-237 196618)

2

1964(3) 22-25 196419) 7

196820)

11(3) 100-1191974

21)9

1966(1) 36-391966

22)1973

23)20

39 15-351997

24)1979

25)10

1966(3) 46-49 196626) 197827)

101994

28) Myers, Isabel Briggs and Peter Briggs Myers,1980, Gifts Differing, Palo Alto, Consulting

Psychologists Press.

198229)

201230) 1980.10.31 131)

HRR 200232)

200533)

SPI

198534)

198535) ’94

JICC 199336) IQ

BP 200737)

199838) 5(1) 197039) 1(5) 196640) 3(1) 196741)

65 201342)

12(3) 14-361975

43)4

1964(3) 44-47 1964

JSPS 25780508

− 30 −