Upload
others
View
8
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SPI
1960 1990 SPI41
23
SPISPI
SPI
The historical development of the synthetic personality inventoryFocusing on the 1960s-1990s
Yu Ninomiya
Faculty of Engineering, Nippon Institute of Technology
Abstract: The purpose of this article was to summarize the development process of the
Synthetic Personality Inventory (SPI) in the point of view of a knowledge of psychology. The SPI
came into widespread use in recruitment examinations for university students and vocational
college students from the 1960s through the 1990s. There are four reasons.
Firstly, employers had to select qualified people from a large pool of applicants effectively.
Applicant numbers were increasing rapidly since university student and vocational college
student populations surged at the time. In addition, students became able to apply freely any
kind of job offer. Secondly, behavioral sciences tended to be applied to business
administration and management. Most business managers trusted the SPI, as it was founded on
applied psychology. Thirdly, some hiring staff could eliminate mentally handicapped
applicants by using the SPI results and justify it by claiming of scientific results. Finally, the SPI
could be utilized in an individual interview examination. In other words, some interviewers
could adjust the questions according to the SPI results of an applicant.
− 21 −
(Keywords: career development, job performance, psychological test)
1
1)
2)
3)
SPI Synthetic Personality Inventory1)
SPISPI
SPI
3 SPI3SPI
1 SPI
− 22 −
GATB General Aptitude Test Battery
SPI
SPI
SPI
SPI
1920
4)
5)
6)
7)
1960
GATBYG
8)
2)
SPI
4 1
23
4
9)
L. L. Thurstone7
− 23 −
SPI 4
1 1940MMPI Minnesota Multiphasic Personality
InventoryMMPI
1950 1960
10)
SPIMMPI
11)
MMPI
12) MMPI
MMPI
3) 13 524MMPI 12 120
YG
(1)(2)
(3) etc.
RPI13) RPI
SORE AC PECA 5
NE DEEW IN OA
HM 6 11
�1 4�����������1�����14)
S N
T F F T
IJ ISTJ ISFJ INFJ INTJ
P ISTP ISFP INFP INTP
EP ESTP ESFP ENFP ENTP
J ESTJ ESFJ ENFJ ENTJ
I Introversion E Extroversion S Sensing
Intuition T Thinking F Feeling
J Judging P Perception
2 1962 MBTIMyers-Briggs Type Indicator -
MBTI C. G. Jung
2
815) MBTI 3
116 MBTI
16,17)
TISPI 16
RPI TI
GATAM VI 2
RMI1974 SPI 2 1970
SPIMBTI
− 24 −
1 3SPI
SPI
18)
SPI
1
SPI
19)
SPI
1960
20)
SPI
TI IE 22
257
21)
�2 �������������������22)
�����������
AU
AH
AG
R100
RK400
A
WAIS
17
70
70
70
25
60
40
45
BS
CA
MR
PA
16
20
40
30
75
50
30
30
100
MAT
MB
MS
21
16
16
80
45
55
RPI
TI
RMI
16
17
18
17
50
30
35
30
− 25 −
MMPI
TPI
TAT)
17
17
17
2
60
60
30
20
30
60
90
30
23) 1960
19704)
5)
SPI
24)
SPI
25)
26)
27)
SPI GAT
1973
16ESTJ
ENTJ
28)
SPI
1960
29)
SPISPI
− 26 −
11980
SPI30)
10 5,000SPI
2,00022 SPI
422 4 8 8 1980
40 11
22 SPI6)
SPI
7)
1976 SPI47
79 198967 64 31) SPI
SPI
32)
SPISPI MMPI
1633)
SPI1990
34)
1993 1
SPI
SPI
SPI
B5 50
SPISPI
35)
SPI
SPI
SPI
− 27 −
SPI
SPI1990
SPI
2 11970 SPI
SPI
36) SPI
37)
22000 SPI
SPI SPI
SPI3
5
SPI
1) SPI
2)
100YG 15
WAIT What Am I Test10
9 5
38)
39)
− 28 −
40)
3) MMPI
41)
4)
5) SCT Sentence
Completion Test
A
42)
6) SPI 2
2
21
43)
7) 198445
SPI44 SPI
1)
20002)
20003)
20104)
20115)
20106)
11(1) 58-681973
7) 19903
87-1052010
8)21
37-64 19979)
1
1963(1) 16-20 196310)
MMPI-1/MINI/MINI-124
200911) MMPI
3 30 196412) MMPI
4 48 196413)
RPI
9 180-187 196714)
MBTI17 316-321 1965
15) Jung, Carl Gustav, 1921, Psychologische Typen, Zurich, Rascher.
− 29 −
198716)
MBTI 48 228-231
196617)
MBTI
8 232-237 196618)
2
1964(3) 22-25 196419) 7
196820)
11(3) 100-1191974
21)9
1966(1) 36-391966
22)1973
23)20
39 15-351997
24)1979
25)10
1966(3) 46-49 196626) 197827)
101994
28) Myers, Isabel Briggs and Peter Briggs Myers,1980, Gifts Differing, Palo Alto, Consulting
Psychologists Press.
198229)
201230) 1980.10.31 131)
HRR 200232)
200533)
SPI
198534)
198535) ’94
JICC 199336) IQ
BP 200737)
199838) 5(1) 197039) 1(5) 196640) 3(1) 196741)
65 201342)
12(3) 14-361975
43)4
1964(3) 44-47 1964
JSPS 25780508
− 30 −