25
© Fraunhofer ITWM 1 3d Microstructure Meeting, Saarbrücken, 2.- 4. Nov 2011 Jürgen Becker Andreas Wiegmann Fraunhofer ITWM, Kaiserslautern Combining Pore Morphology and Flow Simulations to Determine Two-Phase Properties of 3D Tomograms

© Fraunhofer ITWM 1 3d Microstructure Meeting, Saarbrücken, 2.- 4. Nov 2011 Jürgen Becker Andreas Wiegmann Fraunhofer ITWM, Kaiserslautern Combining Pore

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: © Fraunhofer ITWM 1 3d Microstructure Meeting, Saarbrücken, 2.- 4. Nov 2011 Jürgen Becker Andreas Wiegmann Fraunhofer ITWM, Kaiserslautern Combining Pore

© Fraunhofer ITWM1

3d Microstructure Meeting, Saarbrücken, 2.- 4. Nov 2011

Jürgen Becker

Andreas Wiegmann

Fraunhofer ITWM, Kaiserslautern

Combining Pore Morphology and Flow Simulations to Determine Two-Phase Properties of 3D Tomograms

Page 2: © Fraunhofer ITWM 1 3d Microstructure Meeting, Saarbrücken, 2.- 4. Nov 2011 Jürgen Becker Andreas Wiegmann Fraunhofer ITWM, Kaiserslautern Combining Pore

© Fraunhofer ITWM2

Case Study

Input: Tomogram of Palatine Sandstone (Pfälzer Buntsandstein)

Aim: Determine (saturation dependent) permeability

Steps: Segmentation Pore size distribution Capillary pressure curve Permeability (fully saturated) Relative permeability (partially saturated)

Page 3: © Fraunhofer ITWM 1 3d Microstructure Meeting, Saarbrücken, 2.- 4. Nov 2011 Jürgen Becker Andreas Wiegmann Fraunhofer ITWM, Kaiserslautern Combining Pore

© Fraunhofer ITWM3

Tomogram

F. Enzmann, Inst. for Geosciences, Uni Mainz

Pfälzer Buntsandstein

resolution 0.7 µm 1024³ voxels

Page 4: © Fraunhofer ITWM 1 3d Microstructure Meeting, Saarbrücken, 2.- 4. Nov 2011 Jürgen Becker Andreas Wiegmann Fraunhofer ITWM, Kaiserslautern Combining Pore

© Fraunhofer ITWM4

Segmentation

Porosity 25.7 % Downscaled to 512³ voxels

Page 5: © Fraunhofer ITWM 1 3d Microstructure Meeting, Saarbrücken, 2.- 4. Nov 2011 Jürgen Becker Andreas Wiegmann Fraunhofer ITWM, Kaiserslautern Combining Pore

© Fraunhofer ITWM5

Pore Size Distribution

Pore space : X

Opening of radius r :

Volume of pores with radius :

dark grey: light grey:

Page 6: © Fraunhofer ITWM 1 3d Microstructure Meeting, Saarbrücken, 2.- 4. Nov 2011 Jürgen Becker Andreas Wiegmann Fraunhofer ITWM, Kaiserslautern Combining Pore

© Fraunhofer ITWM6

Pore Size Distribution (Sandstone)

Page 7: © Fraunhofer ITWM 1 3d Microstructure Meeting, Saarbrücken, 2.- 4. Nov 2011 Jürgen Becker Andreas Wiegmann Fraunhofer ITWM, Kaiserslautern Combining Pore

© Fraunhofer ITWM7

Capillary Pressure / Pore Morphology Method

Young – Laplace equation

(pore radius <-> cap. pressure)

=> Pore size distribution gives saturationat given cap. pressure

But: connectivity of pores ?

Pore Morphology Method: adds connectivity checks to Young-Laplace low numerical cost

non-wetting fluid

wetting fluid

r

b

Page 8: © Fraunhofer ITWM 1 3d Microstructure Meeting, Saarbrücken, 2.- 4. Nov 2011 Jürgen Becker Andreas Wiegmann Fraunhofer ITWM, Kaiserslautern Combining Pore

© Fraunhofer ITWM8

Drainage

Hilpert / Miller 2001 Guarantees

connectivity of NWP to reservoir

Idea: move in spheres

Start: completely wet

Start: large radius (i.e. small pc)

Steps: smaller radius(higher pc)

No residual water

Non-wetting phase (air) reservoir

Wetting phase (water) reservoir

Page 9: © Fraunhofer ITWM 1 3d Microstructure Meeting, Saarbrücken, 2.- 4. Nov 2011 Jürgen Becker Andreas Wiegmann Fraunhofer ITWM, Kaiserslautern Combining Pore

© Fraunhofer ITWM9

Drainage (+)

Ahrenholz et al. 2008

Additionally: WP must be connected to reservoir

Residual water (orange)

Non-wetting phase (air) reservoir

Wetting phase (water) reservoir

Page 10: © Fraunhofer ITWM 1 3d Microstructure Meeting, Saarbrücken, 2.- 4. Nov 2011 Jürgen Becker Andreas Wiegmann Fraunhofer ITWM, Kaiserslautern Combining Pore

© Fraunhofer ITWM10

Drainage (Sandstone Sample)

Drained pores ( r = 8.4 µm)Drained pores ( r = 14 µm)

Page 11: © Fraunhofer ITWM 1 3d Microstructure Meeting, Saarbrücken, 2.- 4. Nov 2011 Jürgen Becker Andreas Wiegmann Fraunhofer ITWM, Kaiserslautern Combining Pore

© Fraunhofer ITWM11

Drainage - Sandstone Sample

Slice of the 3D result Residual water: 8.6 %

black: air red: residual water white: matrix material

Page 12: © Fraunhofer ITWM 1 3d Microstructure Meeting, Saarbrücken, 2.- 4. Nov 2011 Jürgen Becker Andreas Wiegmann Fraunhofer ITWM, Kaiserslautern Combining Pore

© Fraunhofer ITWM12

Capillary Pressure Curve (Drainage, Sandstone)

Drainage Model (incl. residual water)

contact angle 0°

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Water Saturation

Cap. P

ressu

re [Pa

]

Page 13: © Fraunhofer ITWM 1 3d Microstructure Meeting, Saarbrücken, 2.- 4. Nov 2011 Jürgen Becker Andreas Wiegmann Fraunhofer ITWM, Kaiserslautern Combining Pore

© Fraunhofer ITWM13

(Imbibition)

Hilpert / Miller 2001 No connectivity checks No residual air

Start: completely dry

Start: small radius (i.e. large pc)

Steps: larger radius(smaller pc)

Distribution by pore radius (Young-Laplace)

Page 14: © Fraunhofer ITWM 1 3d Microstructure Meeting, Saarbrücken, 2.- 4. Nov 2011 Jürgen Becker Andreas Wiegmann Fraunhofer ITWM, Kaiserslautern Combining Pore

© Fraunhofer ITWM14

Imbibition Non-wetting phase (air) reservoir

Wetting phase (water) reservoir

Ahrenholz et al. 2008

WP must be connected to reservoir

No residual air

Page 15: © Fraunhofer ITWM 1 3d Microstructure Meeting, Saarbrücken, 2.- 4. Nov 2011 Jürgen Becker Andreas Wiegmann Fraunhofer ITWM, Kaiserslautern Combining Pore

© Fraunhofer ITWM15

Imbibition (+)Non-wetting phase (air) reservoir

Wetting phase (water) reservoir

Ahrenholz et al. 2008

WP must be connected to reservoir

NWP must be connected to NWP reservoir

Residual air (orange)

Page 16: © Fraunhofer ITWM 1 3d Microstructure Meeting, Saarbrücken, 2.- 4. Nov 2011 Jürgen Becker Andreas Wiegmann Fraunhofer ITWM, Kaiserslautern Combining Pore

© Fraunhofer ITWM16

Drainage & Imbibition (Sandstone)

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Drainage

Drainage (res)

Imbibition

Imbibition (res)

Water Saturation

Cap. P

ressu

re [Pa

]

small pores are connected large pores are not connected

Page 17: © Fraunhofer ITWM 1 3d Microstructure Meeting, Saarbrücken, 2.- 4. Nov 2011 Jürgen Becker Andreas Wiegmann Fraunhofer ITWM, Kaiserslautern Combining Pore

© Fraunhofer ITWM17

Permeability

Macroscopic description (homogenized porous media model)

Darcy’s law :

u : average flow velocity : permeability tensor unknown : viscosityp : pressure

Microscopic description (pore structure model)

Stokes equation:

Boundary conditions: no-slip on surface, pressure drop can be determined from the solution!

Page 18: © Fraunhofer ITWM 1 3d Microstructure Meeting, Saarbrücken, 2.- 4. Nov 2011 Jürgen Becker Andreas Wiegmann Fraunhofer ITWM, Kaiserslautern Combining Pore

© Fraunhofer ITWM18

Permeability (Sandstone)

Result: 0.966 e-12 m²

Page 19: © Fraunhofer ITWM 1 3d Microstructure Meeting, Saarbrücken, 2.- 4. Nov 2011 Jürgen Becker Andreas Wiegmann Fraunhofer ITWM, Kaiserslautern Combining Pore

© Fraunhofer ITWM19

Relative Permeability

Idea: Combine phase distributions from pore morphology single-phase flow

Advantage: low computational costs stability

Page 20: © Fraunhofer ITWM 1 3d Microstructure Meeting, Saarbrücken, 2.- 4. Nov 2011 Jürgen Becker Andreas Wiegmann Fraunhofer ITWM, Kaiserslautern Combining Pore

© Fraunhofer ITWM20

Relative Permeability (Sandstone)

Choose saturation level, choose wetting model

Use PM to find air distribution (here: yellow)

Solve Stokes equation in remaining pore space

Page 21: © Fraunhofer ITWM 1 3d Microstructure Meeting, Saarbrücken, 2.- 4. Nov 2011 Jürgen Becker Andreas Wiegmann Fraunhofer ITWM, Kaiserslautern Combining Pore

© Fraunhofer ITWM21

Relative Permeability (Sandstone)

0

2E-13

4E-13

6E-13

8E-13

1E-12

1.2E-12

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Water Saturation

Perm

ebility [m

²]

Page 22: © Fraunhofer ITWM 1 3d Microstructure Meeting, Saarbrücken, 2.- 4. Nov 2011 Jürgen Becker Andreas Wiegmann Fraunhofer ITWM, Kaiserslautern Combining Pore

© Fraunhofer ITWM22

Summary: Case Study

Input: Tomogram of Palatine Sandstone (Pfälzer Buntsandstein)

Calculated properties: Pore size distribution Capillary pressure curve Permeability Relative permeability

Software used:www.geodict.com

Page 23: © Fraunhofer ITWM 1 3d Microstructure Meeting, Saarbrücken, 2.- 4. Nov 2011 Jürgen Becker Andreas Wiegmann Fraunhofer ITWM, Kaiserslautern Combining Pore

© Fraunhofer ITWM23

Other Options

Virtually generated 3D models instead of tomograms Fibrous nonwovens Wovens Sintered ceramics

Consider relative diffusivity instead of relative premeability

Page 24: © Fraunhofer ITWM 1 3d Microstructure Meeting, Saarbrücken, 2.- 4. Nov 2011 Jürgen Becker Andreas Wiegmann Fraunhofer ITWM, Kaiserslautern Combining Pore

© Fraunhofer ITWM24

Other Industrial Applications

Fuel cell: gas diffusion layer

Diapers and hygiene products

Filtration

Paper dewatering felts Sintered ceramics Woven metal wire meshes

Page 25: © Fraunhofer ITWM 1 3d Microstructure Meeting, Saarbrücken, 2.- 4. Nov 2011 Jürgen Becker Andreas Wiegmann Fraunhofer ITWM, Kaiserslautern Combining Pore

© Fraunhofer ITWM25

Thank You !Geometry generator, property predictor and virtual material designer

www.geodict.com