Upload
norah-holland
View
215
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
© FOLEY & LARDNER 2003
“Attorney-Client-Privilege” in Japan AIPLA 2004 Mid-Winter Institute Japan committee pre-meeting
January 28, 2004
© FOLEY & LARDNER 2003
Topics
I. How attorney-client communications are protected in Japanese civil procedure
I-A Attorney’s toolsI-B Client’s toolsI-C Foreign Attorney’s tools I-D Summary
II. Difference of “ACP” between the US and Japan
© FOLEY & LARDNER 2003
1. How AC communications are protected in Japanese civil procedure
No published court decision in Japan
Rarely discussed among scholars
Mostly discussed in US litigation
© FOLEY & LARDNER 2003
1-A Attorney’s tools to shield AC communications
Testimony (Article 197 I(2)*)– Attorney can refuse to testify regarding
facts that:(i) were obtained in the course of professional duties and (ii) should be kept secret (“Facts”).
Document Production (Article 220 (4)(c))– Attorney can refuse to produce
documents that contain Facts.
*The Code of Civil Procedure in Japan
© FOLEY & LARDNER 2003
1- A Attorney’s tools to shield AC communications (2)
Who is “Attorney” under Articles 197 and 220?–Bengoshi (attorney-at-law)–Benrishi (patent attorney)–Gaikokuho-Jimu-Bengoshi–Foreign Attorneys?
© FOLEY & LARDNER 2003
1- B Client’s tools to shield AC communications - Testimony
Testimony (Article197 I(3))Clients can refuse to testify regarding matters relating to secrecy of technology or profession (“Matters”).
What are “Matters”?Disclosure of which would cause detrimental effects to professional activities or activities based on technology [-balancing interests]
(Supreme Court decision, March 10, 2000)
© FOLEY & LARDNER 2003
1-B Client’s tools to shield AC communications - Document Production
Clients can refuse to produce documents:
(1) if documents contain “Matters” covered by 197 I(3) (Article 220 (4)(c)), or
(2) if documents were created for sole purpose of Clients’ use (Article 220 (4)(d))
© FOLEY & LARDNER 2003
1-B Client’s tools to shield AC communications - Document Production (2)
What are the documents created for sole purpose of Clients’ use?(1) for sole purpose of internal use(2) not expected to be disclosed to third
parties, and(3) disclosure would seriously harm Clients
who possess documents, such as impeding decision making process.
(Supreme Court decision, November 12, 1999)
© FOLEY & LARDNER 2003
1-C Foreign Attorneys’ tools to shield AC communications -Testimony
Testimony (Article197 I(3))
Foreign Attorneys can refuse to testify regarding matters relating to secrecy of technology or profession if disclosure would cause detrimental effects to Clients’ activities.
© FOLEY & LARDNER 2003
1-C Foreign Attorneys’ tools to shield AC communications – Document Production
Document Production (Article 220 (4)(c))
Foreign Attorneys can refuse to produce documents that contain “Matters” covered by 197 I(3).
© FOLEY & LARDNER 2003
1-D How AC communications are protected in Japan – summary (1)
Attorney, Client and Foreign Attorney can shield AC communications but the scope of communications to be shielded could be different.
© FOLEY & LARDNER 2003
1-D How AC communications are protected in Japan – summary (2)
Attorney
Client
Foreign
Attorney
• Facts obtained in the course of professional duties
• Matters disclosure of which would cause detrimental effects to professional activities or activities based on technology
• Documents created for sole purpose of internal use
• Matters disclosure of which would cause detrimental effects to professional activities or activities based on technology of CLIENTS.
© FOLEY & LARDNER 2003
2 Difference of “ACP” between US and Japan
U.S. promote full and frank
communications, observance of law and efficient administration of justice
Client & Attorney
communications
Japan protect Client’s
trust in Attorney’s statutory secrecy obligation
Attorney
facts
Purpose
Whose files protected
What is protected