Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
THE
PETERITE.Vol . . IV.
NOVEMBER, 1882 .
No. 32.
THE PROFESSOR:
A TALE OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY.
" Quisnam te, juvenum confidentissime, nostras,
Jussit adire domos ?
CHAPTER VII.
AT this point of the story, the Professor's M .S. becomes somewhat
confused, and at last dwindles into a mere series of notes, not yet
expanded into a continuous tale, whilst his examination of the brain is
evidently only begun . For the benefit of those who may wish to know
the issue of the fortunes of James Smythe, we give the substance so far as
is possible, and what we conceive to be the general drift of his observations.
IIe first very justly observes, that all power, political or otherwise,
bears some relation to property or possessions of some kind, and their
disposal . What property was there then in this dreary submarine region,
whose possession could awaken such a conflict of passions? We will not
follow him through all the heights of his sociological speculations, but con-
tent ourselves with giving what we conceive to be the results . In this
bleak unproductive expanse of caoutchoric-like bituminous valley, where
physical constitution rendered clothes unnecessary, the possession which
could awaken feelings of contention must have consisted either of animals,
such as might have diminished labour, or of food, the universal need of
living creatures, whether it be at the disposal of the whole body politic
or of individuals.
Of the existence of beasts there is no trace in the record, and the
evident conclusion of the Professor is that the sustenance of life was the
subject of their quarrel . As our readers are already aware, that
sustenance was drawn solely from the aqueously-pervaded atmosphere
of this " Cave of the Winds ."
98
TIIE PROFESSOR : A TALE OE TIIE TWENTIETH CENTURY.
Here, then, was most perfect equality : it would seem that among
such a universal proletariat no contentions were possible . Let us, how-
ever, consider the circumstances at that time of their history (for a
history they undoubtedly had) . These will well appear from a repetition of
what we must regard as a somewhat fanciful reconstruction of that history
on the part of the Professor, which we shall give very shortly in substance.
In their simple state, troubles could not arise ; but fortified by their
natural life against the inroads of disease and infirmity the race
multiplied unchecked, until, with the sagacity which in all cases appears
to rise equal to impending danger, they perceived that the supply must
inevitably be unequal to their requirements, when, anticipating the
science of the twentieth century, they with the utmost justice devoted
those who had drunk the cup of life most deeply and were no more of
use to the preservation of the rest.
Of the manner of their death we are about to speak . The Professor
mentions, but to ridicule the too obvious explanation, that—to express
ourselves in the antiquated and (now) classical phraseology of the nine-
teenth century—finding the place growing stuffy, they elbowed each
other until the weakest went to the wall . This, he says, is refuted by
the fact that the extreme young were permitted to survive.
In the absence of evidence as to the conditions of birth and growth,.
and the philoprogenitiveness of the race, we are compelled to acquiesce
in his assertions . For the death, if such it can be called, of the victims
a natural means was to hand in the volcano, whose open mouth was the
receptacle of those whorl the valley rejected . At the time, then, when
the sailor was conveyed to these regions, though such a perfect equality
prevailed that anything of the nature of ascendancy or leadership was
dangerous, especially in the direction of intelligence, which had, by some
incalculable means, arisen and begun to have an appreciable value
among that people, yet in the face of this a foolish feeling of clannish-
ness prevailed, whereby each family was the rather ready to sacrifice
others for the general good. Hence this fierce tide of contest round the
volcano, no inapt meeting-place for their purpose, where turbulence was
king over equality . To this class of superior intelligence belonged the
first entertainer of Smythe, who assisted while others wondered ; yet he
stood in dread of popular jealousy. When, therefore, in the heat of
dispute it was urged that this visitant from another world consumed
more than they all, more than these outworn men upon each side who
THE PI.OFESSOII : A TALE OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY .
99
were ripe for destruction, the stranger who had been in such honour
before stood at once in great danger—and rightly too, though they little
knew it, since he who had been fed on more substantial food found iii a
small quantity of air but a small satisfaction.
THE TWO GENTLEMEN OF VERONA ."
IKE "The Comedy of Errors, " our play of this year belongs toI the first period of Shakespeare's dramatic activity—the lyrical
and fantastic period, as it is generally called . Even if we did not know
from the mention of it in lleres' " Palladis brain('" that it was brought
out before 1598, we could hardly have made the mistake of assigning it
to so late a date, still less to a later. It bears about itself very legible
signs of its own immaturity. It is always unsafe to accuse a great
genius like Shakespeare of making a blunder ; he is so infinitely greater
than we are, that common modesty requires us to think his judgment
better than ours, and to believe that " it is not Homer nods, but we that
dream ." It is not without hesitation, therefore, that I confess I cannot
think that Shakespeare in his later years would have wound up a play
as he has wound up " The Two Gentlemen ." The last scene appears to
me not merely immature work, but positively hasty work, and there-
fore—like all hasty stamped work, by whomsoever done—to a certain
extent bard. Valentine is of a quick, generous temper, but his surrender
of Silvia to his faithless friend shows a temper that is not so much
over-hasty and over-generous as absolutely impossible . i know that
Valentine's conduct here has been defended by some critics, who see in
it a heroic self-sacrifice, which is quite in keeping with his character.
They may be right, but I can only say that the " self' ' -sacrifice which
would sacrifice a sweetheart to the man she detested, in utter regard-
lessness of her feelings, must be self-sacrifice of a very extraordinary
kind . And not merely this incident, but the whole scene seems unreal ;
a sort of climax of improbability being reached when the Duke and
Thurio are brought in by the outlaws to make up the party and get the
play over quickly.
Next to the immaturity of the play, perhaps, the thing that strikes us
most forcibly is the parallelism of the characters, the setting off of one
against another .
Valentine is opposed to Proteus, Silvia to Julia,
100
THE TWO GENTLEMEN OF VERONA.
Launce to Speed. Proteus, Silvia, and Speed have a good deal in
common ; so have Valentine, Julia, and Launce ; Speed and Launce
being a sort of parody, each of the other's master . Let us look at the
characters more closely.
Proteus is emphatically the man of the world . From a worldly point
of view, he has spent his youth to good purpose ; he has lost very little
time ; he has gained a very considerable acquaintance with les belleslettres ; he has taught himself how to write dainty sonnets, and how to
talk fluently and bear himself with ease and grace in society. And, like
all intelligently selfish people, he is well rewarded for his trouble ;
everybody speaks highly of him, and whenever he goes into society he
far outshines the straightforward Valentines and stupid Thurios . Ile
treats his friend in a dastardly manner : and yet Shakespeare can
hardly have meant us to think of him as a man of really had nature.
There must have been something good in him over and above his showy
accomplishments, or Julia and Valentine would never have loved him so
truly. He is fickle as his name implies, but even while he is sinning he
reproaches himself, and his better 'nature cannot but re-assert itself
in the end.
Valentine is no courtier or scholar, but a man of action, fond of
" active deeds . " Protons falls in love for want of something to do, but
Valentine lets love come to him instead of going to seek it . He shows a
want of acuteness more than once ; when Silvia woos him be do's not
understand her jest, though it is " invisible as a nose on a man's face, or
a weathercock on a steeple ; " he falls readily into the rather clumsy
snare set for him by the Duke ; he never suspects the villany of Proteus.
The truthfulness of his own heart prevents him from imagining deceit of
any sort in others.
Each of these two characters needs a compliment ; each could with
advantage learn something of the other. And so we not only see why
each needs the other for a friend—we also see why each needs for its
beloved, not a like but an unlike character. Silvia is like Proteus, .Julia
like Valentine ; or, rather, Silvia, has the best characteristics of Protens,
Julia of Valentine . Silvia has the more showy and attractive qualities
of wit and brightness ; Julia has a tenderer and deeper nature . Julia
is " sweetness, " Silvia is " light.
We see the same opposition again in the clowns . The sharp and
witty Speed is very properly assigned to Valentine, the stupid Launce to
TILE TWO GENTLEMEN OF VER.ONA .
101
Proteus . And all through the play the close observer will observe the
way in which they mimic the actions of their betters . Speed is Proteus
in low life, and he will be swinged for intrusion into his friend's love
affairs ; and Launce's parting from his (log is a parody of the parting of
Protests and Julia . In this connection of the humour of the play with
the graver scenes, Shakespeare shows a distinct advance on "The
Comedy of Errors ." The humour, too, is in itself better ; and it has
been said that " one touch of the by-play of Launce and his immortal
dog " is worth half the dancing doggrel or broad-witted prose of either
Dromeos.
It is interesting to notice in the play sketches which Shakespeare
afterwards improved upon. Thus Lucetta's criticisms of Julia's suitors
are the prototypes of that scene in the " The Merchant of Venice"
where Portia criticises her suitors as Nerissa names them. Again,
Launce with his funny Malapropian misconception of words is the
pioneer of Lancelot in " The J[erchant ." Lastly, Julia is the first of a
group—" that charming group,' Professor Dowden has well-called it,—
" of children of Shakespeare's imagination, which includes Viola,, Portia,
Rosalind, and Imogen,—women who assume under some constraint of
fortuue the disguise of male attire, and who, while submitting to their
transformation, forfeit none of the grace, the modesty, the sensitive
delicacy, or the pretty wilfulness of their sex ."
I have left myself no space to speak of particular passages . But as I
abused the final scene at the beginning of my article, I will quote from
that four lines of especial beauty . They are the cry of a wounded soul--
the bitter cry against " mine own familiar friend in whom I trusted "
" Who should be trusted when one's own right hand
Is perjured to the bosom ? Proteus,
I am sorry I must never trust thee more,
But count the world a stranger for thy sake ."
In the pathos of such lines as these the poet shows that he already
feels life to be no plaything, that the mystery of it is already being
brought home to his heart . Still, as yet, he attempts no ambitious
flight ; he is content to sing us a quiet harmonious song, with the
gladness of youth ringing through it all . And we may be content, too,
to hear him, knowing that he will have greater things to tell us
by-and-bye.
J . 1 f . P
1U2
OXFORD LETTER.
THE river has signalized the return of the under-graduate population
of the " City of spires," by rising to the g r eatest height on record
at least the greatest in the memory of the oldest inhabitants . The
floods have done a considerable amount of damage, having swept away a
great portion of the foot-bridge near to Kennington Island, and the dani
under Magdalen Bridge . The so-called improvements to the last-
mentioned bridge are being rapidly completed ; and the contractors
working day and night (literally) at it, presumably they are afraid of
exceeding the contract time . The 1videning of the bridge will certainly
not make it more ornamental ; and it is equally certain that it will not
make it more useful ; for the only time when it is crowded at all is on
market days . and that is the result of the trains . the introduction of which
was a scheme equally useless with the widening of the , bridge . The
additions to Magdalen and Keble Colleges are also in a fair way to be
completed . The President of the Boat Club is A. R . PATErtSON (Trinity),
re-elected ; and the Secretary chosen in place of Buck is HIGI :LNS, this
year's 'Varsity stroke . The prospect of next year's eight seems fairly
bright ; in any case there will be only three vacancies, Mourne, De
Haviland, and Fort being all left, in addition to Paterson and Higgins ;
if West comes up—as it is rumoured lie may—and Kindersley can row
again, Cambridge may bid good-bye to their chance of success.
The 'Varsity Challenge Fours are to be rowed in the second week of
November ; there is an unusually large number of entries, eight, if I
mistake not, in all. Of these IIertford, B .N .C ., Exeter, and Keble are
the pick, and IIertford is toy choice of the four.
The President of the Athletic Club is WELLS (Magdalen) re-elected;
and the Freshmen's sports are on the 13th and 14th of this month ; the
only "likely " man, so far as rumours go, comes from Magdalen College
School . The Rugby team, of which VASSAL is again Captain, have
played one match, viz ., against Sandhurst, which we won by a goal and
a try against two tries . We play the R .E.M.C. on November 4th.
The team is exactly, or very nearly so, the same as last year.
The Philo-Thespian Club is making strenuous efforts to become as
representative of the 'Varsity as the Cambridge A .D .C. We may safely
trust their efforts may be crowned with the success they merit ; for, so far
as can be learnt, dramatic representations are not contrary to the
OXFORD LETTER .
103
principles of the present Vice-Chancellor (Professor Jowett, of Ralliol),as in the case of Dr . Evans, who was Vice-Chancellor last year.
Dr . Pusey's place has been taken by S. R . Driver, of New College, who(to quote the "Morning Post." ), is a Hebrew Scholar of great reputationin Germany, and a devout Christian.
Oxford is favoured with good music even more than usual this term.With a first-class concert on Saturday, the 28th, and on Tuesday, the 31st,(when Antoinette Stirling and Mary Davies sang) ; Charles Ha1le'sconcert soon to follow, and the " Elijah " by the Choral Society, withothers of less account, we shall do fairly well.
We hope to see some Peterites up this term, and we believe we haveto welcome a very old Peterite in F . H. Dominichetti, of Oriel .
BEBI.
CA1\IBRIDGE LETTER.
<
ET us talk about the weather, " said the Major-General ' sL daughters when they were at a loss, and following their sug-
gestion I will begin my letter by remarking that so far only one dayhave we had this Term without any rain . Is this the fault of the comet,or are we to have no more dry weather? This moist state of thingsnaturally throws a damp on out-door pursuits, and hardly tends to givethe aquatic aspirant a pleasant idea of Cambridge tubbing ; still in spiteof rain and wind the river is daily crowded with erratic tubs, whoseunskilful occupants harass the souls of their respective coaches with theirimpotent efforts to escape out of the way of the many College Eights,which are now beginning their preparation for the Races next Term.Mallinson, who stroked his college boat so well at the May Races, is firstCaptain of Christ's boat club, and performs his duties with his charac-teristic energy. The President of the C .A .B .C . has two eights out daily,and 1 am glad to see that Eyre is rowing bow in one of them, and hopethat the settlement of the Fours, which at present keeps many goodmen out of the trials, will not be the signal for his ejection . Turningfrom Boating, I hear some tidings of the Football team, and dismalprognostics as to our match with Oxford ; of course I mean the Rugbyteam, which as yet gives no promise of being as good as last year's, in
104
CAMBRIDGE LETTER..
spite of the presence in our ranks of Don Wanchope, Fuller, andChapman . The following O .P .'s are playing for their respective colleges ;Douglas of Christ's, W . H. and F . T. Griffith of Clare, G. H. Eyre of
Corpus, and J . H. Collinson, of Queen's . At the time of writing thefirst day of the Freshmen's Sports is just over, and I am sorry not to seeany of our newly-arrived Peterites figuring on the programme ; howeverEyre somewhat made up for this by winning the Open Mile Handicapfrom the fifty-yard mark, which he accomplished in 4m . 45s. Lastweek the Misses Robertson charmed us with their harmony, and thisweek we are to be woke up from the sleep of superstition by an exposerof Spiritualism . The A.D .C . announce a performance of The Critic to
take place this Term ; I shall be curious to see it, and mark thedifferences to when I last witnessed it in the School Hall six years ago.
At last Selwyn College, or rather Hostel, is un fait accompli, and inspite of the ominous forebodings of the detractors of his merits, hassecured as many undergraduates as it has room for : whether it will overattain to the popularity of Keble, Oxford, is a question which I will notdiscuss, but will confine myself to wishing it all success in its righteous
war against college exorbitance . Before I close I will as usual give a
list of the O .P .'s in residence ; they are—J . H. Mallinson, E . A. Douglas,
R. C. Wilton and Crawshaw at Christ's ; W. H. and F . T . Griffith atClare ; K . Marshall at King's ; G. H. Eyre and A . Peters at Corpus ;
J. H. Collinson at Queen' s ; A. Chadwick at S . John's ; T. Kitchin at
Trinity ; A. Gibson at Pembroke ; J . Marshall at Cavendish .K. K. K.
SCHOOL LETTER.
SINCE the appearance of the last Peterite, the course of events have
made it extremely difficult to collect the meagrest scraps of newsfor the grasping Editors . No more is heard of the anxious questions"What is to be the play? " " Who will be in the team?" All suchdebateable points have been settled, and settled satisfactorily . Thechosen play is " Two Gentlemen of Verona," the leading parts being taken
by L. E . Stevenson, as Valentine, and C . H. Steavenson as Proteus . Thelatter, who has not appeared on our stage before, promises very well.
F . R. Brandt is acting in the character of the Duke ; II . W. Rhodes, of
SCHOOL LETTER .
105
Julia ; C. P . Green, of Silvia ; most of the minor characters are taken by
new actors . I had almost forgotton to mention that Speed will be per-
sonated by T. English, who, to judge from last year, should well sustain
the life and fun of his part . The performance on the whole ought to be
a success, as Mr . Yeld has not so much crude material in high places to
work on, and almost all of the important characters are filled by those who
have had the benefit of his instruction in previous years . In addition to
this, the scenes between Sir John Falstaff and Shallow in the second
part of Henry the Fourth, are to be performed . The main parts will be
taken by L. E . Stevenson and T. English . On the whole it promises
to be a remarkably lively end to a somewhat tedious and lifeless
play.
The weather here is decidedly objectionable . After an immense
quantity of rain, which has seriously interfered with all sports, the river
has risen to a considerable height . "Comparisons are odious," yet for
all the unpropitious visitations of rain, the football team have been able
to play enough to show that they are not so inferior to those of former
years as was expected ; in fact, they are of fairly representative quality.
Out of four matches only one has been lost, and another drawn . The
last one against St . John's Training College, would in all probability have
been won but for some questionable decisions of our opponents' umpire,
and the extreme readiness of their whole team to interefere with others
for adhering to rules which they themselves repeatedly violated . The
other match, r . Durham School, will no doubt be fully discussed in your
"Special Correspondent's" account . Impartial spectators, however,
declare that it was lost mainly on account of the unfortunate choice of
goals, and the two strange mistakes made by one of the School backs,
which to all appearances ought never to have been made . Otherwise
the two teams were remarkably well matched.
The latest thing here is the agitation about the boundaries of Clifton,
to remove the artificial divisions and include the whole in the City.
What if the plan is carried and the revels of the Fifth have to be given
up in so appropriate a place as the neighbourhood of the school where
the notorious Guy received his education i' Yet, apart from the
suppression of the nocturnal rites, that would inevitably follow iii this
Liberal age of Reform, from other points of view the change is " a
consummation devoutly to be wished ."
106
FOOTBALL.BY the time of the writing of this article the school season has fairly
begun, and with more success than could have been expected . At the
opening the prospect was gloomy enough, nine of the fifteen having left,
including two three-quarters, one half-back, and several leading
forwards. However, as most of the remaining members have consider-
ably improved, and several very useful substitutes have been discovered,
the team may on the whole be considered to be of fairly average quality.
Of the old veterans, L . E. Stevenson, W. Kaye, and C . Williamson have
all improved greatly, the first especially in running, and the two latter
in kicking . Williamson has, we are sorry to say, been forced to leave
the team since the commencement of this term for some time, though his
return for the concluding matches may perhaps be hoped for . Isis
absence will be greatly felt, as he was developing into an excellent three-
quarter back, and was worthily filling the place vacant by the loss of
W. E. Brockbank. H. Crossley has become a reliable back, and H. G.
Joy has considerably improved as forward . Of the new members P. E.
Lord will make a very useful three-quarter, and J. Crossley is
undoubtedly the best forward in the school ; both are decided additions.
The two half-backs also play remarkably well together, passing very
unselfishly, and working well . The style of play is perhaps better than
it has been for some time, as the backs are taking more to kicking, and
the forwards to dribbling and passing. The regular team is : W. J. P.
Kaye, Ti . Crossley (backs) ; L. E. Stevenson, C . J . Williamson, P . E.
Lord (three-quarter-backs) ; H. W. Rhodes, M. 1) . Taylor (half-backs) ;
E. W. Clayforth, H . G. Joy, J. Crossley, F . E. Robinson, F . R. Brandt,
C . II . Steavenson, C . Lane, C. Johnson (forwards) . In the internal
matches the School IIouse bids fair to maintain its supremacy, as it
contains nine of the team, including one of the backs, both three-
quarters and half-backs . The Sixth Form, though playing without two
of its members who are also in the Fifteen, defeated the School after an
extremely hard game by one goal to a try and disputed try . Up to half
time the game was very even, only one touch-down being scored on each
side . Soon after half-time Taylor ran in, but the kick failed, as the ball
was touched by one of Sixth before passing over the bar . After-
wards Kaye got in for the Sixth, and Stevenson kicked a goal . The
game continued very even until Johnson, apparently getting the ball off-
side, dribbled it in and touched it down after it was dead. The Sixth
F OOTI,'A IA . .
107
naturally disputed the try, but nothing resulted from the kick . Stevenson,
Joy, and Lord were most conspicuous for the Sixth, while Taylor, Mar-
shall, and If . Crossley behind the scrimmage, and J . Crossley forward
did excellent work for the School We have to record just before going
to press the School's first defeat ; a defeat however without disgrace.
Excuses are at all times objectionable ; but when any reasonable ground
for accounting for non-success is at hand, it may surely be urged without
objection . The two winning points scored by Durham were off two
foolish mistakes made by one of our backs . Surely any player might be
expected to know one of the prime and invariable rules, not to kick the
ball directly in front of his own goal, p inch more not to aggravate it by
panting from behind the goal line against, a strong wind . Such play
cannot be explained ; it is to be hoped that it will be a lesson in future
to him not to risk a game in order to save a mere minor or indecisive
point .
v. OLD BOYS.
The School Fifteen played their first match on September 30 in an
incessant downpour of rain . Kaye kicked off uphill, and play began in
the Old Boys' "25 ." After about ten minutes play Taylor made a short
run and scored a try near the touch line, from which nothing resulted.
Clayforth dropped out, but the ball still remained in the enemies' half,
and Stevenson gained a try, which was punted out, but again with no
result . Newman now relieved his side by some good runs, but the
School forwards playing up well, Clayforthi secured it try under the posts,
from which the captain kicked a goal . After half-time the School had
it all their own way, Stevenson, Clayforth, Joy, and J . Crossley all
scoring tries . From these were scored three goals (all kicked by
Stevenson), and one punt out . In addition to those who obtained tries
Williamson was conspicuous with short runs and long punts. Old Boys t
back, II . C . B . Clayforth ; three-quarter-backs : P. L. Newman, F.
Ware ; half-backs : B. G. M. Baskett, P . A. Todd ; forwards : J . F.
Griffith, A . Peters, F.'1'. Griffith, C. Johnson, T. II . English, C. Johnson,
W. S. Gofton, G . Ralph .
r . YORK.
Played on the School Ground on October 10th ; the home team
scored an easy win by two goals, eight tries and ten minor points to nil.
The forwards on both sides were very evenly matched, and the game
108
FOOTBALL.
among them was fast and exciting, but behind the scrimmage the
balance was decidedly in our favour, as may be seen from the fact that
Stevenson gained seven and Williamson three tries, thus dividing the main
honours between them. Among the forwards J . Crossley was especially
brilliant, and was well supported by H. G. Joy and C . Lane . The backs
(lid their duty well, Kaye being very useful with long kicks . The York
forwards were well led by Twyford, who put in some extremely useful
work, and all played a pluckily losing game . York : back, S. Burkill;
three-quarter backs, R . Wood, G. Newenham; half-backs, G. G. Thomp-
son, J . Gay ; forwards, C . Twyford, R . Thompson, P . A . Todd, W. H.
Cobb, J. Wolstenholme, F . Weatherill, F . L . Gay, and two others.
r . ST. JOHN'S TRAINING COLLEGE.
This match was played on the School Ground on October 14th . The
School kicked off, and the ball was returned by Kitson, the first
scrimmage being formed about the centre of the ground . After some
good forward play on both sides, the ball was passed to Stevenson, who
gained some ground, and then passed to Williamson, the latter making a
long punt and forcing the College backs to save . The drop out was well
followed up, but the ball was carried back to their twenty-five . From some
loose play, Smith, one of the College three-quarters, secured the ball and.
made a fast run, finishing with a good punt to the great delight of the
assembled Collegiates . The St. John's forwards were off-side and failed to
allow the School back the legitimate five yards, but picking the ball up,
one of them got behind the goal line, alleging the try to be fair . This
of course was disputed by the School, and, the umpires disagreeing, the
try was taken under protest, but nothing resulted . After the drop out
the ball remained in the centre of the ground until half-time, Stevenson
and Williamson for the School and Smith and Briggs for the College
doing useful work . After changing ends, Briggs kicked off for the
College, Williamson returning the ball by a short run and kick ; Kitson
ran the ball back, but again Williamson got hold and sent it into their
quarters by a long punt . A long delay was here caused by the ball being
kicked out of the ground. The school were rather hard pressed for
some time, and at last Smith had the ball passed to him, and by a very
smart run grounded it inside our line close to touch . Kitson was deputed
to kick, who tried, by kicking the ball a short distance and then picking
it up, to drop a goal, but he was charged down and the ball rushed
FOOTBALL .
109
up the field. Stevenson made a short run, but was collared by Smith,
whose play throughout the game was very fine . A long kick now sent
the ball over the College line, and their back instead of touching it down ,
tiled to kick, and missed the ball, Rhodes scoring a try for the School,
from which no goal resulted, and Lord running in obtained a second try
which the College disputed. The match thus ended in a draw, the
College scoring one try, one disputed try, and two minor points ; the
School one try, one disputed try, and two minor points. Of the School
forwards, all played well, the pick being Crossley, Lane, and Johnson ; of
the College forwards, O'Neal, Cowling, Appleton and Turner were the
best. The School had their ordinary XV. The College team was as under:
Back, H. P. Ward ; three-quarter backs, Smith, Pitson, Briggs ; half-
backs, Nugent, Tyne ; forwards, Appleton, Jackson, Turner, Stradling,
Cowling, O'Neal, Welsh, Kidd, and Parsons.
v . DURIIAM SCHOOL.
Played on the School Ground on Saturday, November 4th. The home
team won the toss and elected to play with the wind . Brutton kicked
off for Durham, but the ball was carried back by the wind, and the
visitors' forwards succeeded in reaching it before the School three-
quarters could secure it . Brutton and Jollie were immediately prominent
with good runs, and the ball was gradually worked into the home " 25 ."
Here Miller at half-back passed to Brutton, who made a quick run, but,
being well held by Brandt, passed to Wethey, who was pushed into
touch almost at the corner . From the line out Brutton again got the
ball, but was collared by Crossley within five yards of the home goal
line. The York forwards now played up hard, and carried the ball to
the centre of the ground, where the ball continued for some time. Kaye
had the ball passed to him, and made a good punt into touch . On the
ball being thrown out Wethey made a smart run, carrying the leather
into neutral ground, where it was scrimmaged for some time, Clayforth
and Crossley putting in good work for York, Rogerson and King for
Durham. Stevenson and Kaye made good runs about this point, the
latter almost getting in . Rhodes made a short run and kick, but the ball
was called back, having been dead in one of the ridges, which were fairly
full of water and mud. Taylor now got the ball and made some ground,
but was pulled down by Brutton . Soon after this Rhodes got the ball
and passed to Stevenson, who succeeded in placing it behind the Durham
goal line. The kick, which was against the wind, failed . Half time was
110
FOOTBALL
called soon after, with the ball in Durham territory, the score standing,
York 1 try, 1 minor point, Durham nil . The School now kicked off,
with the wind, which seemed to be increasing every minute, against them,
and the ball remained in the centre at the start . The Durham forwards,
being superior in the loose as York in the pack, now ran the ball down
the field, and Brutton punted over the line, where an unfortunate mistake
on the part of one of the home backs gave the visitors a free catch right
in front of goal ; from this a goal was kicked . After the ball was re-
started it was kept in their half till the Durham captain, by another huge
hunt, sent it to our " twenty-five ." Here, from a throw out, Brutton got
the hall and crossed the York line, but the ball not being thrown out
straight this point was disallowed. Soon after a second free catch was
made by Durham, but the kick was well stopped by the York forwards.
However, before time was called, Brutton succeeded in scoring a try, from
which he kicked a beautiful goal . Durham thus won a very even match
by 2 goals to 1 try . For Durham, Brutton, Jollie, and Wethey were best
behind, Rogerson and King forward . For York, Stevenson, J . Crossley,
and Brandt sheaved up well . Durham : back, J . P . Matthews ; three-
quarter-backs, E . B. Brutton, F. O. Jollie, J. F. Wethey ; half-backs :
T. Hall, '1' . 'Miller ; forwards : Rogerson, Kerriek-Walker, Ferguson,
Bennett, Gace, King, Lohden, Shaw . Parker.
NOTES AND ITEMS.J . II . Daniel, of Queen's, has been rowing in the trial eights at Oxford,
at No. 7.
AV . F . B. and J . F . Calvert have been chosen to play in the Yorkshire
County trial match at three-quarter back and forward respectively.
E. English has been re-eleeted to be House Physician at the London
Hospital for the second time.
G . AV. Bulman is the reserve back for Durham County football team.
CORRESPONDENCE.
To THE EDITORS OF "Tim. PETE RITE ."
DEAR Sias,—I was very glad to hear that the various distances in the
Athletic Sports had been carefully measured, and that the general
management was so good ; but still I hope I shall not be set down as a
carping spirit if I suggest two more improvements .—Firstly, and
CORRESPONDENCE .
III
if I am wrong no doubt the Athletic Committee will inform me, I
always thought our school weight was fourteen pounds ; therefore I
should like to ask whether it was weighed before the sports, so that we
may be certain that the statement in the Peterite was quite accurate,
that two members of the school could put over thirty-two feet with a
sixteen pounds weight.
Secondly, I would ask, who takes the times, and with what ? Time-
keeping is such a ticklish business, and needing so experienced a hand,
that unless someone can be procured who thoroughly understands it,
it would, in my opinion, be better not to publish any times for the
hundred yards where one-fifth second makes a good deal of difference.
1 am led to this remark by seeing that on grass the distance was run in
ten-and-three-quarter seconds (see Peterite Report), ,and surely that is
too good to be true. Before I close 1 would suggest that the Old Boys'
race should be carefully handicapped, taking into consideration the
performances of each competitor, which could hardly, I think, have been
done by anyone who gave P. L . Newman fifteen yards start of Chadwick
in quarter mile .
I am, yours truly,
G. II . EYRE.
To TILE EDITORS OF a THE PETERITE . "
DEAR Sirs,—Allow me once more to trespass upon your magazine,
in answer to a letter that appeared in the last number. Your corres-
pondent disappointed me : he promised to point out some " startling
inaccuracies, " but I have looked in vain for these sensational exposures.
He denounced my nova de plume and charged me with irrelevance, but
gave neither reasons for the one nor instances of the other, though he
flaunted the proud title of " Fair-play ."
The first part of my letter he leaves to the " proper persons,"—a
modest and prudent policy. But he is mistaken in saying that I blamed
the junior crew for being unfit . I did not . I alluded to one person
in that crew, to whom 1 herewith apologise if it was not for want cf
training that the failed. It was a pity that he should have been asked
to do what practice might have shewn to be an impossiblity . I pr(surne
that was owing to want of hands . But how came there to be that
112
CORRESPONDENCE.
want? Still I believe, had not the stroke unfortunately broken down, the
school-house would have been able to defeat its more juvenile antagonists.
Your correspondent then breaks off into a complacent disapproval of
the existing regime, and we come to the following—" It is a very
patriotic and proper policy to contract a considerable debt on the
boat-house, and yet to empty the subscriptions into the contractor's
pockets ." It is alliterative certainty ; but what does it mean ?
Again, I do not see why what he is pleased to call—among other
epithets—a " monotonous comparison," should be a red rag to him.
"Comparisons are odorous," I daresay ; but only when unfavourable,
and that is our own fault. " Monotonous," that comparison could
hardly be, for I find after examining the " Peterite," it has not been
made before . " Ungenerous " it might have been, had it been written
after our reverses at cricket . But there is nothing heinous in the
mention of a rival with a view to stimulate a healthy spirit of emulation.
I am well aware that the school I alluded to cannot compete with
ours in educational success . Indded-t Is it because the cleverest boys
come to St . Peter's? I think not . It is because dull and clever alike
are forced on by excellent teaching. Why not the same in Athletics?
I don't mean to be ungenerous or pugnacious, but it is so in many schools.
Next comes the moan over " decline and depression,"—offensive
from its very staleness . " Fairplay " asks the school in a maudlin
patronising way, " , What's the use of your trying ? You're no good
now. The school is going down ." This I emphatically deny . " Let
us hope for his conscience' sake "Fairplay" didn't see the athletic
sports of last year. Any rational observer would have noticed a
general excellence, far in advance of previous years, and I believe that
still " there are as good fish in the sea as ever came out of it ." The
school will doubtless thank him for this gratuitous insult—this
"ungenerous hit ." I will merely ask them, increased as they are in
numbers, to give a practical refutation to such "flagrant misstatements
and libellous accusations ." And, perhaps, the misrepresentations of
" Fairplay, " which, like most misrepresentations, " cannot be sub-
stantiated," will act as a wholesome tonic combined with the " unpleasant
and unpalatable truths " of
ESPRIT DE CORPS.
[This correspondence must now cease .—Eu.]