2
learn.jtsa.ed To receive Tora visit jtsa.edu/sub אחר דבר| Mournin The Library Yūsuf va Zul a Author: Jāmī, Scribe: Eliyah Mashad, Iran: ms. 1534 Joseph and Z tradition of Is the Egyptian parashat Vay Sufism, the e between God This manusc forcibly conv among Jews but of their a the story, and parashah. In t du ah from JTS by email, bscribe A Different P ng for Joseph of the Jewish Th aykhā (Joseph and , (1414-1492) hu ben Nisan ben E : 1852–1853 Zulaykha was written slam (Sufism). It is courtier, Potipha yeshev, she attemp eventual love betw d and his mystical d ript was produced verted to Islam in shows that their af attraction to Sufi sp d this page describ this account, howev TORAH FROM J Perspective h eological Semina d Zulaykha) Eliyahu Gorgī n by Jāmī, a Persia based on the bibl r (she is known a pted to seduce Jos ween Joseph and devotees. d after the Jewish 1839. However, th ffection for this Suf pirituality. The tex bes the death of Jo ver, it is Zulaykha w JTS ary an poet and adhere lical story of Josep s Zulaykha in Mu eph but was spurn Zulaykha was a m h community of M he ongoing popul fi tale was not a pr xt is a Judeo-Persia oseph, as is also fo who mourns him. ent of the mystical ph and the wife of uslim tradition). In ned. In contrast, in model of the love Mashad had been arity of this story roduct of coercion an transcription of ound in this week’s Para Given nearing blessin immin Abrah though Jacobs inherit banish of Isaa In like older t brothe so palp the dis bowl a fact is the thr vis-à-v By the sons, a family, irration of Jaco love (J (Josep shat Vayehi Bles Rabbi Direct Canto all that’s come b g their end bring ng. The passing o ent. Experience am accedes to G h Ishmael will als s” (he, too, will ance of God’s b hed in an unforge ac’s destiny as heir manner, Jacob t twin. That his rig er wrestled in Reb pable and radiate stinction between and the Abraham that the imperati reat of fratricide, vis their sons and e time we get to and their daughte , the blessing o nal love. The riva ob and his sons a Jacob’s, by Leah ph, by Potiphar’s learn.jt 5776 ssings From i Joel Alter tor of Admissions orial School and C before in Genesis s dread. This ste of a patriarch mea tells us that thes God’s elevation o so be great even father twelve n blessing. Worse s ttable episode of r to the blessing c twice takes for hi ghtful inheritance becca’s womb rea es outward, dama n the household i mic blessing that h ive of Jacob’s de Jacob flees into Esau tries to rega o Jacob’s adult fa er, blessing as suc f rank and statu lries, deceit, and re one miserably and Rachel) or s wife) or denyin tsa.edu Love s, The Rabbinical College of Jewish s, the Torah’s no ms not from fear ans that a scene o se transitions are of Isaac over his by the measure nations), God ex still, Ishmael and f rupture and vuln cannot be denied mself blessings o was already esta ads as small comfo aging his whole f inheritance that J he claims as a wo stiny sunders the a long exile. Isaa ain love he hadn’t amily—his wives, ch is not even on us gets establish violence that ma failed attempt af destroying a belo ng a beloved to ויחי תשע" וSchool and H. L h Music, JTS otice that Israel’s r of death, but a of generational bl e neither easy no firstborn, Ishma of “keeping up xplicitly rejects I d his mother, Ha nerability. The im , even at great pa ostensibly reserve ablished when he ort because Esau family. While I’m Jacob ladles into lf in sheep’s cloth bonds of family. c and Rebecca ta t known he’d lost. their maidservan n the table. Rathe hed as an expre ark every turn of t fter another at co oved that cannot another (Joseph פרשת. Miller days are dread of lessing is or clean. ael. Even with the shmael’s agar, are mperative ain. d for his e and his u’s pain is blurring his own hing, the Against ake sides nts, their er, in this ession of the story mpelling t be had h, by his

רחא רבד A Different Perspective g for Joseph · manner, Jacob t win. That his rig r wrestled in Reb able and radiate tinction between nd the Abraham that the imperati eat of

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: רחא רבד A Different Perspective g for Joseph · manner, Jacob t win. That his rig r wrestled in Reb able and radiate tinction between nd the Abraham that the imperati eat of

learn.jtsa.edTo receive Toravisit jtsa.edu/sub

| דבר אחרMourninThe Library

Yūsuf va ZulaAuthor: Jami ,Scribe: EliyahMashad, Iran:ms. 1534

Joseph and Ztradition of Isthe Egyptianparashat VaySufism, the ebetween God

This manuscforcibly convamong Jews but of their athe story, andparashah. In t

du ah from JTS by email, bscribe

A Different Png for Joseph

of the Jewish Th

aykhā (Joseph and, (1414-1492)

hu ben Nisan ben E: 1852–1853

Zulaykha was writtenslam (Sufism). It is courtier, Potipha

yeshev, she attempeventual love betwd and his mystical d

ript was producedverted to Islam in shows that their af

attraction to Sufi spd this page describthis account, howev

TORAH FROM J

Perspective h eological Semina

d Zulaykha)

Eliyahu Gorgī

n by Ja mi, a Persiabased on the bibl

r (she is known apted to seduce Josween Joseph and devotees.

d after the Jewish1839. However, th

ffection for this Sufpirituality. The tex

bes the death of Jover, it is Zulaykha w

JTS

ary

an poet and adherelical story of Joseps Zulaykha in Mueph but was spurnZulaykha was a m

h community of Mhe ongoing populfi tale was not a pr

xt is a Judeo-Persiaoseph, as is also fowho mourns him.

ent of the mystical ph and the wife of uslim tradition). In ned. In contrast, in model of the love

Mashad had been arity of this story

roduct of coercion an transcription of ound in this week’s

Para

Given nearingblessinimminAbrahthoughJacobsinheritbanishof Isaa In like older tbrotheso palpthe disbowl afact is the thrvis-à-v By thesons, afamily,irrationof Jacolove (J(Josep

shat Vayehi

BlesRabbiDirectCanto

all that’s come bg their end bring

ng. The passing oent. Experience am accedes to Gh Ishmael will alss” (he, too, will ance of God’s b

hed in an unforgeac’s destiny as heir

manner, Jacob ttwin. That his riger wrestled in Rebpable and radiatestinction betweenand the Abrahamthat the imperati

reat of fratricide, vis their sons and

e time we get toand their daughte, the blessing onal love. The rivaob and his sons aJacob’s, by Leahph, by Potiphar’s

learn.jt

5776

ssings From i Joel Alter tor of Admissionsorial School and C

before in Genesiss dread. This ste

of a patriarch meatells us that thes

God’s elevation oso be great even

father twelve nblessing. Worse sttable episode ofr to the blessing c

twice takes for hightful inheritance becca’s womb reaes outward, daman the household i

mic blessing that hive of Jacob’s deJacob flees into Esau tries to rega

o Jacob’s adult faer, blessing as sucf rank and statulries, deceit, and re one miserably and Rachel) or

s wife) or denyin

tsa.edu

Love

s, The RabbinicalCollege of Jewish

s, the Torah’s noms not from fearans that a scene ose transitions areof Isaac over hisby the measure

nations), God exstill, Ishmael andf rupture and vulncannot be denied

mself blessings owas already esta

ads as small comfoaging his whole finheritance that J

he claims as a wostiny sunders thea long exile. Isaa

ain love he hadn’t

amily—his wives, ch is not even onus gets establishviolence that mafailed attempt afdestroying a belo

ng a beloved to

ו"תשע ויחי

School and H. Lh Music, JTS

otice that Israel’s r of death, but a of generational ble neither easy no firstborn, Ishma of “keeping up xplicitly rejects Id his mother, Hanerability. The im, even at great pa

ostensibly reserveablished when heort because Esaufamily. While I’m Jacob ladles intolf in sheep’s cloth bonds of family.c and Rebecca ta

t known he’d lost.

their maidservann the table. Rathehed as an expreark every turn of tfter another at cooved that cannotanother (Joseph

פרשת

. Miller

days are dread of lessing is or clean. ael. Even

with the shmael’s

agar, are mperative ain.

d for his e and his u’s pain is

blurring his own hing, the Against

ake sides

nts, their er, in this ession of the story mpelling t be had h, by his

Page 2: רחא רבד A Different Perspective g for Joseph · manner, Jacob t win. That his rig r wrestled in Reb able and radiate tinction between nd the Abraham that the imperati eat of

TORAH FROM JTS learn.jtsa.edu

brothers). How many times in a single story can Joseph die a death of sorts on the road to realizing his destiny? How many times can Jacob be bereft of a child over the error of loving one overmuch? It’s no wonder, then, that the reader feels dread in our parashah when Jacob is nearing death and word is somehow dispatched to Joseph alone, who presents himself at his father’s bed with his two sons, Manasseh and Ephraim. Indeed, the scene goes forward in as inauspicious way as we have come to expect: The favored son again gains his father’s special attention as he always has. Joseph learns that Jacob will exercise his prerogative and elevate Joseph’s sons through adoption to the same status (vis-à-vis inheritance) as Joseph and his brothers (Gen. 48:5–6). Joseph’s “take” relative to his brothers is now doubled. What follows is confusing, as it seems that Jacob—having just adopted the boys—seems not to know who they are. “Who are these boys?” he asks in verse 8, to which Joseph responds: “They’re my sons, whom God gave me in this place [Egypt].” With the seeming confusion cleared up, Jacob says, “Bring them to me that I may bless them.” Scholars explain that the bumpy sequence in our passage results from the Torah editing together two different tellings of the same story. The commentator Keli Yakar, though, understands Jacob’s hesitation differently. He reads Jacob’s words to be elliptical—an unfinished sentence that when expressed in full reads thus: “Joseph, who are you bringing forward for a blessing? These boys are unworthy.” Jacob’s entire life has been about destiny and the struggle to protect it. He is also a prophet. His comment derives from his knowledge that Ephraim’s descendants will include the evil kings of Israel Jeroboam and Ahab. “How,” Jacob is wondering, “could I possibly invoke God’s blessing on these boys, knowing as I do who will come from them?” Joseph replies, “They are my children. Whatever else may be true about them and their descendants they are my children and from my perspective they merit blessing.” Joseph brings as proof the fact that God blesses Isaac when God knows that Isaac’s son Esau will bear descendants who include idol worshipers. In the Keli Yakar’s interpretation, Joseph counters his father’s resistance to blessing his sons by referencing the moment when God saves Ishmael, the rejected son. Ishmael lies dying of thirst in the wilderness (because God himself endorsed his banishment)! In that moment, Ishmael is an innocent. God does not leave him to die but, seeing him שם-הוא באשר , as he is and where he is, reveals to

Hagar a well of water at hand from which she might save her son’s life and her own (Gen. 21:17–19). In our scene at Jacob’s deathbed, Joseph tells his father that he must bless the boys. “They are my children and from my perspective they merit blessing. When it comes to blessing, who one is and where he is now is the only thing that matters. For all creatures are blessed by God. So of course you should bless them.” The penultimate scene in Parashat Vayehi, and with it the Book of Genesis, is a heartbreaking moment of reconciliation. Jacob has died and Joseph’s brothers fear that Joseph will finally feel free to retaliate against them for their long ago cruelties toward him. In their panic, they resort to a lie (well, I’m not certain they’re lying, but it sure feels like it). They say that before Jacob died he conveyed to them that Joseph must forgive them their wrongs. Joseph weeps. He recognizes that the destiny that has driven his life and driven his family from the very first was from God and was for the good. It has placed him in exactly the position of superiority of which he dreamt as an adolescent. But the damage wrought in realizing that destiny lingers still. Seeking yet again to heal its wound, Joseph reassures his family that the grand, generational trajectory of that destiny—which secured the establishment of the clan that will become the Children of Israel, God’s covenanted people—does not wipe away the filial bonds upon which it is built. In Genesis 50:20 he recognizes that he was destined to sustain a vast nation. But in the next verse he speaks to the individual people, his brothers, standing before him: “Fear not. I will sustain you and your children.” The Torah adds that “He comforted them and spoke to their hearts.” The magnanimity and fundamental kindness that close the book of Genesis resolve with peace and love the colliding trajectories of national destiny and family integrity we have tracked since Abram first quarreled with Lot. What has been a continual tear in the fabric of Abraham’s family is finally mended. Judaism calls on us to live in response to the great imperatives of the Jewish People, mindful of our covenantal responsibilities that in varying ways transcend time, space, autonomy, nationality, and more. Our answer to that call sometimes yields a “no” to other imperatives, and sometimes at great pain. Yet that very “no” must sometimes be checked by Joseph’s rejoinder to his father, Jacob: “They are my children. From my perspective, they merit blessing. They are blessed by God. So you bless them, too.”

The publication and distribution of the JTS Parashah Commentary are made possible by a generous grant from Rita Dee (z”l) and Harold Hassenfeld (z”l).