13
® © 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. © 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Updates on WaterML 2.0 development Updates on WaterML 2.0 development and the standards harmonization and the standards harmonization discussion paper discussion paper 71st OGC Technical Committee Mountain View, CA. USA Peter Taylor (CSIRO), David Valentine (CUAHSI) December 8, 2009 Sponsored and hosted by

® © 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Updates on WaterML 2.0 development and the standards harmonization discussion paper Updates on WaterML 2.0 development

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ® © 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Updates on WaterML 2.0 development and the standards harmonization discussion paper Updates on WaterML 2.0 development

®

© 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc.© 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc.

Updates on WaterML 2.0 development Updates on WaterML 2.0 development and the standards harmonization and the standards harmonization

discussion paper discussion paper 

71st OGC Technical Committee

Mountain View, CA. USA

Peter Taylor (CSIRO), David Valentine (CUAHSI)

December 8, 2009

Sponsored and hosted by

Page 2: ® © 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Updates on WaterML 2.0 development and the standards harmonization discussion paper Updates on WaterML 2.0 development

OGC®

© 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. 2

OverviewOverview

•Paper Updates–Time component–Hydrologic observations requirements

•Paper Summary•WaterML 2

–First cut of schema generated–In use by GW interoperability 

Page 3: ® © 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Updates on WaterML 2.0 development and the standards harmonization discussion paper Updates on WaterML 2.0 development

OGC®

Proposed methodologyProposed methodology

• The proposed methodology is the address the development of various aspects of a harmonised model in phases that relate to particular types of observations styles. The initial phase will address in-situ style observational data sets in the following areas:– Time series structures (results);– General metadata for the procedure used in measurement;– Minimal metadata data for spatial features (descriptions of stations)

and guidance on linking to external descriptions;– Techniques for linking to definitions of observed phenomenon

© 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. 3

Page 4: ® © 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Updates on WaterML 2.0 development and the standards harmonization discussion paper Updates on WaterML 2.0 development

OGC®

WMO Technical Regulations WMO Technical Regulations

• Define concepts and standard types of observations typically made within the hydrology domain as well as relevant observations from other domains such as climatology and meteorology.

• The regulations break hydrometric stations into the following categories:– (a) Hydrometric stations;– (b) Groundwater stations;– (c) Climatological stations and precipitation stations for hydrological

purposes;– (d) Hydrological stations for specific purposes.

© 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. 4

Page 5: ® © 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Updates on WaterML 2.0 development and the standards harmonization discussion paper Updates on WaterML 2.0 development

OGC®

Hydrometric stationsHydrometric stations

• River, lake or reservoir stage;• Stream flow;• Sediment transport and/or deposition;• Temperature and other physical properties of the water of a

river, lake or reservoir;• Characteristics and extent of ice cover on rivers, lakes and

reservoirs;• Chemical and biological properties of the water of a river,

lake or reservoir.

© 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. 5

Page 6: ® © 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Updates on WaterML 2.0 development and the standards harmonization discussion paper Updates on WaterML 2.0 development

OGC®

Climatological stationsClimatological stations

• Precipitation:• Air temperature (including extreme temperatures);• Air humidity• Wind:• Amount and type of cloud;• Snow cover:• Evaporation (measured with evaporation pan);• Solar radiation;• Sunshine;• Soil temperature;• Atmospheric pressure;• Soil moisture.

© 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. 6

Page 7: ® © 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Updates on WaterML 2.0 development and the standards harmonization discussion paper Updates on WaterML 2.0 development

OGC®

Groundwater stationsGroundwater stations

• Water level;• Temperature and other physical properties of the water;• Chemical properties;• Rate and volume of abstraction or recharge.

© 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. 7

Page 8: ® © 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Updates on WaterML 2.0 development and the standards harmonization discussion paper Updates on WaterML 2.0 development

OGC®

Adopting a common modelAdopting a common model

• Generating a schema from the core model that suits a deployment platform

• Defining or importing other specific schema requirements

• Linking a schema to vocabulary definitions• Generating documentation• Customising a validation framework• Adapting tools

© 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. 8

Page 9: ® © 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Updates on WaterML 2.0 development and the standards harmonization discussion paper Updates on WaterML 2.0 development

OGC®

TradeoffsTradeoffs

• Soft-typing vs. hard-typing

• Data Exchange vs Archival– Standalone vs. Reference to information

© 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. 9

DataRecord

+element (param, value)

TimeSeries

+ date

+ value

+ property

RiverLevel Measurement

+ date

+ level

Soft-typed Hard-typed

Page 10: ® © 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Updates on WaterML 2.0 development and the standards harmonization discussion paper Updates on WaterML 2.0 development

OGC®

Example river flow observation in UMLExample river flow observation in UML

© 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. 10

class

«FeatureType»SouthEskBasin :HY_Basin

«FeatureType»MacquarieRiv er :HY_Riv er

«FeatureType»Riv erObse rv ation :

Observ ation

«FeatureType»DopplerFlowMe ter :Process

«Type»Riv erFlow :PropertyType

resultData:TimeSeries

«FeatureType»MacquarieAtTrefusis :

HY_GaugingStation

+featureOfInterest

+result

+carrierOfCharacteristics

+observedProperty

+procedure

+sampledFeature

+riverBasin

A doppler flow meter was used to make a flow measurement of the Macquarie river at the Macquarie at Trefusis station. The result of this observation was a time series. The Macquarie River is in the South Esk Basin

Page 11: ® © 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Updates on WaterML 2.0 development and the standards harmonization discussion paper Updates on WaterML 2.0 development

OGC®

Testing the SchemaTesting the Schema

• Test the generated schema will be tested in the – Groundwater Interoperability

Experiment – South Esk test bed within Tasmania.

• These two projects will provide feedback on the schema design that will be considered by the WaterML2.0 development group..

© 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. 11

Page 12: ® © 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Updates on WaterML 2.0 development and the standards harmonization discussion paper Updates on WaterML 2.0 development

OGC®

WaterML 2WaterML 2

© 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. 12

Page 13: ® © 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Updates on WaterML 2.0 development and the standards harmonization discussion paper Updates on WaterML 2.0 development

OGC®

WaterML 2WaterML 2

• In use for the GW Interoperability– Re-using SWE Common types, presently.

• Need to develop a common model, so additional interoperability experiments will be needed.

• To be developed further based on:– Further discussions within WaterML2 development group (including

extra international groups)– Future interoperability experiments

© 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. 13