Upload
julia-evans
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
>>
1
Eurostat meeting 5-7 June 2013
Draft´
Mogens Grosen (Statistics Denmark)
>>
2
Background #1 : ”The role of the NSI’s and metadata needs to change … ”
200 years ago: “statistics as state secrects”
Today: “handling complexity”
• A lighthouse in the turbulent sea of information
• Focus on metadata to support knowledge processes
• Metadata must give user exact knowledge on products – ”Information at your fingertips” 2
>>
3
Background #2 ”… towards focus on user needs”
>>
4
Background #3: “Challenges on metadata … ”
• Metadata are not reused and often only linked to final data
• No link to GSBPM processes• Parallel systems with tight links to DBMS-systems • Presentation of metadata on Internet is
fragmented and incomplete• Concepts database incomplete with no hierarchy
(Super-, sub- and synonym-concepts) • Classifications and code-lists in many places• No clear awareness of populations and units
>>
5
Background #4: ”Metadata must be connected and
reusable ”
Hvad betyder
Quality declaration
Variable/datasetConcept
Variable database
Klassifikationsdatabase
Classifications
Methods/ ”Survey”StatBank Methods papers
Class database
Concepts database
5
>>
6
Methodology #1 Business Process Management
1. “BPM is a process management methodology where business processes are managed, designed and continuously improved in order to increase the business effectiveness and value creation”
2. Requirement reflects objectives in strategy
>>
7
Methodology #2: From silos to focus on processes and user-needs
>>
8
Methodology #3: Business proces-model as starting point (GSBPM)
>>
9
Methodology #4: Extended business process model
>>
10
Methodology #5: Extended Business Procesmodel aiming at compatible value-chains
STATISTIC DENMARK
EUROSTAT, UN, OECD etc.
STATISTICS SWEDEN
etc.
>>
11
Methodology #6 Stepwise development
>>
12
EU GRANT PROJECT TOLD
SHORTLY
>>
13
TITLE"Horizontal and vertical
integration: Implementation of technical and statistical
standards in the European Statistical System"
>>
14
DELIVERABLESQuality declarations migrated to new metadata system for all statistics
Meetings and reports from external users
Dissemination of dst.dk developed in collaboration with users
Software (Colectica) installed - internal interface and external interface (dissemination at dst.dk)
Manuals and coursesThe transition from current to new quality declarations
Continuous updates - follow Dst's process model
Communication:Newsletters, reference group and thematic meeting each quarter
Intranet Page
>>
15
SUCCES-CRITERIAManagement at all levels have been regularly
informed and have made the necessary decisionsThere are taken care of communication of the
project - “Everybody want changes, but no one wants to be changed"
External and internal customer needs is "translated" into internal processes and communication at dst.dk
Relevant standards are implemented into a single integrated metadata system
>>
16
TIME SCHEDULE
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Pilotphase part 1
Pilotphase part 2
Evalua-tion &
plan 2014
2013J F M A M J J A S O N D
Adjust-ment
Implementation on all surves
Evalua-tion
2014
>>
17
STATUS MAY 2013Project organization and communication establishedSeries of meetings with external users startedBasic software (Colectica) installedRequirements for extensions of Colectica in the pilot
phase part 1 prepared.Extensions of Colectica ready (pilot-phase 1)Draft guidelines discussedBest-practice discussions with the UN, EU, Australia,
France (meeting 5-6 June in Eurostat)Meeting Metadata WG 1-2 July (SIMS on the agenda)
>>
18
ESQRS
>>
19
Qualitydeclarations – old and newNuværende Nye EU krav = kommende Kommende kvalitets-kvalitetsdeklarationer indtastningsniveau (Colectica) deklarationer på dst.dk
Indhold Indhold IndholdPkt. 1 Pkt. 1 Pkt. 1Pkt. 2 Pkt. 2 Pkt. 2Pkt. 3 Pkt. 3 Pkt. 3… … Pkt. 4… … Pkt. 5… … Pkt. 6Pkt. N Pkt. 21 Pkt. 7
Nye krav - dvs. ikke indeholdt i Indberetning tilnuværende kvalitetsdeklaration Eurostat
>>
20
STANDARDS
>>
21
Standards #1 GSBPM combined with QAF, DDI, SDMX and ESQRS
DDI DDISDMX
Quality Assurance Framework (QAF, ESQRS, ESMS etc.)
>>
22
Standards #2 Benefits on using DDI
• Integration and reuse of concepts, variables, classifications on micro- and macro-level including dissemination, quality-declaration etc.
• Integration with Statistics Denmark's process model
• Versioning and multi-langugage• Implementation of thesaurus • Synergy due to national and international
cooperation and experience (Australia, New Zealand, France etc.)
25. oktober 201122
>>
23
DDI-structure (DDI-profile) combined with ESMS/ESQRS – using Colectica
A. Population: - Universe-scheme Universe
B. Common pool:- DDI-instance (In Colectica: a project for each maintopic)
- Ressource-package- Conceptscheme Concept- Categoryscheme Category- Codescheme Code- Variablesheme Variable
C: Studies- Group (in Colectica: a serie for each survey )
- Study unit incl. Quality Declarations(quality statement) with ref to concepts, universe etc.
- Universe-reference- Ressource-package
- Variable-scheme Variable-reference
>>
24
Metadatabase og softwareWeb-application and integration
with Eurostat app.
Web-services and data-access funktioner
Metadatabase (Colectica repository)
Colectica SDK (Software Developmen Kit)
Colectica Designer – internal interface
>>
25
DEMO
>>
26
Issues for discussion
1. Towards a common terminology using DDI, ESQRS/ESMS and GSIM (concept, unit, population etc) on micro and macro-level
2. Common DDI-structures / DDI-profiles3. How to ensure vertical and horisontal
integration and the role of standards– “Each organisation is unique with historically based practices of
management, social aspects and professional skills. As a consequence of this, organisations with their own built-in complexity can only respond to certain impulses from the outside world … Cooperation and implementation of standards must ensure fulfilment of common goals and at the same time allow organisations to make decisions that fit their historically-based practices and “local” environment.”
>>
27
The End!