Upload
nesta
View
678
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
A presentation given by representatives of UCL's Mapping for Change project at our Digital Tools and Neighbourhood Design Workshop, an event designed to explore the impact of digital tools on community design, engagement and improvement. For more information, visit: http://www.nesta.org.uk/event/digital-tools-and-neighbourhood-planning-workshop
Citation preview
Community Mapping DIGITAL TOOLS AND NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANNING
7TH JULY, 2014
• Social enterprise based at UCL
• Promotes and supports community-based initiatives towards building more sustainable communities through the use of maps and geographic information.
• Specialises in community mapping, citizen Science, and connecting online and off line community engagement through maps, using traditional and leading edge mapping technology and geographical information systems for community goals
Mapping for Change
Why Mapping? To gather local knowledge
To create new/alternative maps
To educate and communicate with external agencies and decision-makers
To identify key issues for action planning
To assist with data gathering for research
To facilitate decision-making processes
To identify data gaps
To make comparisons between areas
To expose complex social/spatial interactions
Technology and Community Mapping
Importance of Community Participation ◦ Web GIS long been seen as highly important – used to disseminate
information to the general public ◦ Air quality
◦ Flood risk
◦ Planning applications
◦ Cycle routes
◦ Seventy-five per cent of all information in local government in Britain is geographically referenced
◦ 45 of the 122 national e-government priorities required GIS (in 2008)
Technology and Community Mapping
Importance of Community Participation ◦ Develop Web-GIS to provide communities with information about
what is happening locally
◦ Maps act as a ‘one-stop shop’
◦ Maintained by the community for the community
Technology and Community Mapping
Some Technical Requirements ◦ Clear definition of community boundary and community
identity ◦ Own branding on the site
◦ Ability to group data into themes
◦ Ability to view points, lines and polygons on the map and retrieve information about the data, photos and videos ◦ All users
Introduction to existing public
information
General perception mapping
Discussion & initial priorities
setting
Digitisation, visualisation
and discussion
Website and online map
Citizen Science and data gathering
Engagement Process
In each community, we start with a discussion about the official, public data that is available about their area
Thematic activities introducing aims and objectives, policy setting.
Presenting existing publically available information about places, spaces and people in a given community.
Introduction to existing public
information
General perception mapping
Discussion & initial priorities
setting
Digitisation, visualisation
and discussion
Website and online map
Citizen Science and data gathering
A discussion leads to the list of issues that should be mapped and the way they will be mapped
Introduction to existing public
information
General perception mapping
Discussion & initial priorities
setting
Digitisation, visualisation
and discussion
Website and online map
Citizen Science and data gathering
Perception Mapping
Focuses on questions such as:
What aspects of your neighbourhood you like or dislike?
What problems do you want to solve?
Places you go to / don’t go and why?
Safe / unsafe places
Barriers
Introduction to existing public
information
General perception mapping
Discussion & initial priorities
setting
Digitisation, visualisation
and discussion
Website and online map
Citizen Science and data gathering
In some cases, perception mapping leads to focused evidence gathering, in other cases this is done directly after the discussion.
Noise measurements
Introduction to existing public
information
General perception mapping
Discussion & initial priorities
setting
Digitisation, visualisation
and discussion
Website and online map
Citizen Science and data gathering
Introduction to existing public
information
General perception mapping
Discussion & initial priorities
setting
Digitisation, visualisation
and discussion
Website and online map
Citizen Science and data gathering
Technology and Community Mapping
Northfleet Community Profile
Noise mapping – Pepys Estate & Royal Docks
Mapping for Change
LCY noise mapping study at http://bit.ly/LCYNoise
Design simple but relevant recording materials
Scrap yard
Community Centre
Nursary
School
A local campaign group, some of whose members participated in the monitoring, went on to submit a legal challenge against Newham council's decision to approve the expansion.
The communities efforts and the noise mapping by activities gained coverage in The Evening Standard.
“The Royal Docks community map brought residents together and gave them confidence to call for changes in their community. “
Royal Docks Noise Monitoring Outcome
A public meeting attended by the local community, local authority and Environment Agency.
Noise pollution acknowledge and trained acousticians employed to carry out an investigation.
Scrap yard license revoked.
Community mobilised to address other environmental issues and push for change.
Noise Mapping – Pepys Estate
Pepys Noise Monitoring Outcome
Community Air Quality Monitoring
The most common, simplest and well-proven method for measurement. Comparable with local council data.
Design simple but relevant recording materials.
Diffusion tubes
• Local Authority installed diffusion tubes at the main junctions identified as having higher levels of NO2
• Installation of PM10 monitoring stations to get a more accurate picture of PM10 levels in the area.
• Community want data to form a baseline in view of proposed housing developments. Local population of 6500 set to double in an area of approximately ½ a sq. mile.
Pepys Air Quality Monitoring Outcome
Widely distributed press
release targeted at politicians and media
Follow-up with Wandsworth Council, TfL and Mayor’s Office
Key achievement in persuading TfL to introduce hybrid and retro-fitted buses
Putney Air Quality Monitoring Outcome
Over 20 communities across London replicating the methodology, independently. Many using the online community map to record their results.
Collective Awareness Platforms for Improving Accessibility in
European Cities & Regions
Aims:
Develop tools for collectively gathering and sharing information on the accessibility of public places through a participatory user centred design approach.
Exploit the power of online maps and mobile devices for fostering awareness of barriers for individuals with limited mobility and for removing such barriers.
Participatory Sensing
Tools for Assessing Data Quality
Tools for Collective Tagging
Tools for Supporting Awareness Raising & Collective Action
Tools for Visualisation
Services and tools for routing for people with limited mobility
http://www.myaccesible.eu
End users include people with limited mobility, policy-makers and public administrators, spatial planners and facility managers, NGOS…
Engagement through ‘walking’ tours, focus groups, mapping parties, video diaries…
Developing online tools informing about accessibility of places and routes
Supporting collective action to remove barriers
http://myaccessible.eu/myaccessible-eu-video
150 people join Bologna wheelchair ‘walk’ End user focus group
Design for Wellbeing STREET MOBILITY AND NETWORK ACCESSIBILITY
TOWARDS TOOLS FOR OVERCOMING BARRIERS TO WALKING AMONGST OLDER PEOPLE
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/street-mobility/project
Street Mobility
The Street Mobility & Network Accessibility project aims to develop tools for overcoming community severance (also known as the 'barrier effect').
Community severance occurs where transport infrastructure or the speed or volume of traffic act as a physical or psychological barrier to the movement of people.
MfC Community Engagement Strand
Aims To:
Unearth local voices in seeking explanations for the spacial patterns and processes identified in other research strands
Woodberry Down – Perception Mapping
:
Their Woodbury Down
Their friends and family networks
Their preferred places
Their preferred routes
Their access to services and resources
Places they avoid & why
Barriers – physical and perceived Results of perception mapping with residents over 50 are currently being compiled
During a number of lunch club visits, coffee mornings and community festivals we asked residents about:
Community Map
Woodberry Down residents can use the
evidence gathered on the map to help
improve accessibility in the area.
UCL researchers will use the data to
inform the development of methods to
assess community severance at the
individual, street and area-wide level to
enable research into the effects on
mobility, wellbeing and health.
Administrators Comment Location
Project Observation
Fields Observation Type
View
User group
web-based administration
Public API
Backend
Third-party applications
Get in touch
Follow us:
– http://www.mappingforchange.org.uk
– Twitter: @Mapping4Change
– Twitter: @UCL_ExCiteS