15
+ How Do Theories Prescribe Collaborative Learning? Foundations for a Design Theory on Collaborative Project-Based Learning Dabae Lee Indiana University

AECT 2010 Collaborative learning

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

This presentation was made at the annual AECT conference 2010.

Citation preview

Page 1: AECT 2010 Collaborative learning

+

How Do Theories Prescribe Collaborative Learning? Foundations for a Design Theory on Collaborative Project-Based Learning

Dabae Lee

Indiana University

Page 2: AECT 2010 Collaborative learning

+Purpose

To generate the groundwork for an instructional design theory

on collaborative project-based learning

Reviewed descriptive theories on collaborative learning

Social constructivism

Social interdependence theory

Game theory

Page 3: AECT 2010 Collaborative learning

+Cooperative vs. Collaborative Learning

Cooperative learning

Students have separate roles in

a structured task and pool their

works to a specific end

Collaborative learning

Students must plan and

accomplish something together

(whole together)

Page 4: AECT 2010 Collaborative learning

+Conceptual Framework:

Instructional Design Theory

ID Theory

Methods Situations

Conditions Outcomes

Reference: Reigeluth (1999)

Page 5: AECT 2010 Collaborative learning

+Overview

Learning

Informed by Social Constructivism

Collaboration

Informed by Social Interdependence Theory

Interaction

Informed by Game Theory

Page 6: AECT 2010 Collaborative learning

+Social Constructivism

Social Cognitive Perspective

• Piaget’s theory of social cognitive conflict

• Children can benefit from interaction among peers whose abilities are similar to their own

Social Cultural Perspective

• Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development

• “Asymmetrical” interaction between collaborators who differ in their levels of ability

Page 7: AECT 2010 Collaborative learning

+Social Constructivism

Methods Conditions Outcomes

Heterogeneity in each

group (Difference in

perspective,

intellectual

development, and

domain expertise

should exist)

Tasks that involve

perspective-taking,

planning, and problem

solving, and are ill-

structured.

Learners that are

capable of those

activities, and

demonstrate similar

level of negotiating

skills.

Academic

achievement, cognitive

development

Page 8: AECT 2010 Collaborative learning

+Social Interdependence Theory (Lewin

1935, Johnson & Johnson, 2009)

CollaborationPositive

Inter-dependence

PromotiveInteraction

Individual Accountability

Group Processing

Social Skills

Page 9: AECT 2010 Collaborative learning

+Social Interdependence Theory

Methods Conditions Outcomes

- Positive

interdependence

- Individual

accountability

-Group processing

- Promotive interaction

- Small group size

preferred

- Learners’ social skills

(Interpersonal,

communication,

teamwork skills, and

open-mindedness)

Academic

achievement,

retention,

transfer of learning,

critical thinking,

creative thinking,

positive attitudes

toward the tasks

Page 10: AECT 2010 Collaborative learning

+Game Theory (Von Neuman & Morgenstern, 1944)

“Game theory is about what happens when people interact” and it “…can be used to predict, and also to explain and prescribe” (Carmerer, 2003)

The normal form of game is a competitive game in which each of two players has their own strategies and takes actions with complete information about the actions of the other player. e.g) Chess

Watch an example

Various types of games

Competitive vs. Cooperative

Two-players vs. Multiple players

One time vs. Multiple times

Page 11: AECT 2010 Collaborative learning

+Collaboration Game

A cooperative game in which two or more players are aware of

the level of the other players’ participation

“Perception of fairness”, Rewards/Effort = Fair

Members choose whether to actively contribute to the group

work or not depending on their perception of fairness among

group members. i.e. Reduce their effort when there is a free

rider.

Full participation can be accomplished by having “cooperative

enforcer”, a member who punishes free-riders and achieve the

level of “fairness” among group members.

Page 12: AECT 2010 Collaborative learning

+Collaboration Game Example

Moving chairs together to another place

Can’t leave until all the chairs are moved

A free-rider detected

Other members would do:

To achieve fairness

Reward

Effort

Page 13: AECT 2010 Collaborative learning

+Game Theory

Methods Conditions Outcomes

Transparency of each

member’s effort and

rewards.

A group coordinator.

Learners should be

capable of making

legitimate perceptions

of contribution &

rewards

Active participation in

the group’s work

Page 14: AECT 2010 Collaborative learning

+Future Research Directions

Prove efficacy of game theory in collaborative learning

Interpret empirical results of collaborative learning using the

theoretical framework of game theory,

Relate empirical findings of game theory in different disciplines to

collaborative learning

Test the theory in collaborative learning contexts.

Page 15: AECT 2010 Collaborative learning

+Questions & Comments

Email: [email protected]